Market Square Health Care Center, LLC
3 Market Square, South Paris, ME 04281 · For profit - Individual · 76 certified beds · (207) 743-7086 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.7% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.7% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.3% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.1% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.1% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 74.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.8% | 20.8% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.00 | 1.45 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 2.01 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.1%CMS range 49.3–73.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 5.4–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.7–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 68.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #41, #51) on 2 of 4 days of survey (5/11/26, 5/12/26). Finding: 1.Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] , revealed Resident #41 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) 14 of 15 indicating he/she is cognitively intact. On 5/11/26 at 9:23 a.m., a surveyor observed, from the hallway, CNA #8 assisting Resident #41 get up and dressed for breakfast. Resident #41 was sitting on the edge of his/her bed in only a brief. Privacy was not provided as the bedroom door was open and no privacy curtain was drawn. The surveyor observed residents and staff passing the resident's room at this time. On 5/11/26 at 9:23 a.m., in an observation and interview, the Administrator confirmed the above finding. 2. Resident #51 has diagnoses to include, but not limited to, dementia. A review of Resident #51's most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units ([NAME] East, [NAME] and Tuttle) and the laundry room for 1 of 1 facility tour.Findings:On 5/14/26 from 8:45 a.m. to 9:25 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Environmental Tour with the Environmental Services Director and the Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor in which the following findings were observed and discussed:[NAME] East Unit:- Spa room - The floor and base of the whirlpool had dirty/stained caulking and rust along the outside edge.- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The floor was dirty and stained with brown substance. The base board heater had chipped/missing paint creating an uncleanable surface.- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The room floor was all scuffed up and dirty. [NAME] Unit:- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was an unlabeled urinal on a sink that was shared by multiple residents.-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide written transfer/discharge and bed hold notices to include cost of care, which included appeals rights to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #1, #9, #38 & #77). Findings: 1. Resident #1's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and again on 4/17/26 and was subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #1, who was responsible for himself/herself, was provided with written bed hold notices upon transfer. On 5/12/26 at 1:05 p.m., in an interview with 4 surveyors present, Director of Nursing Services confirmed that the resident did not receive written bed hold notices for the two transfers to the hospital. 2. Resident #77's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on 4/2/26. The clinical record lacked evidence that the resident and/or resident representative were provided with a written a transfer/discharge notice and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to reflect the current needs of the resident for 5 of 18 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents #17, #38, #25, #61, #85). Findings: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses to include Quadriplegia. On 5/11/26 at 10:37 a.m. a surveyor observed Resident #38 sitting in a high-back wheelchair in his/her room. At this time, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered the room and refilled Resident #38's water bottle that was part of a hands-free adaptive drinking system with a flexible arm and mouthpiece, located on the back of his/her wheelchair. During an interview, Resident #38 stated that the device allows him/her to drink independently. A review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed physician orders dated 2/9/26 and 5/5/26 for Occupational Therapy that state, Therapeutic Exercise; Therapeutic Activities; Self Care/Home Management Training; Neuro Re-education; Wheelchair Management; Group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure lifesaving medical equipment was restocked and readily available for use in an emergency for 2 of 2 emergency (crash) carts observed ([NAME] East and Tuttle Units).Findings: Review of Emergency Equipment Checklist Policy dated 3/19 states Emergency equipment and supplies will be checked every night on third shift by a licensed, or his/her designee, to assure all emergency equipment and supplies are present, sufficient, and in proper functioning order:Equipment/supplies to be checked include oxygen and oxygen equipment; cardiac board, suction machine and suction equipment; ambu bag- PPE [personal protective equipment]Procedure: Check Oxygen Emergency Tank: verify contents of tank; crank open tank with wrench; assure oxygen flow with regulator; crank oxygen tank shut with wrench; validate presence of ambu-bag and masks; locate cardiac board; validate function of suction machine and presence of tubing and yankauer/catheter; validate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards by failing to ensure that a patient lift had working safety clips and failing to ensure that chemicals were properly secured for 2 of 2 observations for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/11/26 and 5/12/26). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's motorized wheelchair safety screen was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #61). Findings: 1. On 5/11/26 at 9:18 a.m., a surveyor observed a patient lift in the hallway by resident room [ROOM NUMBER] which had a broken safety clip on the sling arm that would not safely secure a sling strap when used to lift a resident. On 5/11/26 at 9:23 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator observed and confirmed the broken safety clip on the patient lift. 2. On 5/12/26 at 4:17 p.m., two surveyors observed a 32 fluid ounce bottle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to ensure that respiratory equipment was clean to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to oxygen tubing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #11).Findings:On 5/12/26 observations at 6:50 a.m., 7:02 a.m., and 7:10 a.m. of Resident #11 was observed lying in bed, nasal canula tubing is attached to his/her nose but the connector is lying on the floor in front of the oxygen concentrator, and visible from the door.On 5/12/26 at 7:33 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 was observed standing in the doorway resident's room, nasal canula tubing attached to his/her nose but oxygen tubing is noted to be lying on the floor not attached to the oxygen concentrator, and visible from the door.On 5/12/26 at 7:34 a.m., CNA#7 was standing in residents' doorway and saying Good Morning [Resident #11] nasal canula tubing attached to his/her nose but oxygen tubing is noted to be lying on the floor not attached to the oxygen concentrator, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for 2 of 3 units reviewed for medication storage (Tuttle and Andrew's Went Unit's). Findings:1. Review of Tuttle's Med Cart Controlled Substance Log on 5/11/26 revealed the following:- No outgoing signature on 5/25/25 at 0630, 5/28/25 at 0700, 6/12/25 at 2100, 8/13/25 at 0700, 9/10/25 at 0700, 9/19/25 at 1535, 10/6/25 at 2300, 11/28/25 0700, and on 12/10/25 at 0700.- No incoming signature on 9/19/25 at 1900 and on 11/27/25 at 2035.2. Review of Andrew's [NAME] Med Cart Controlled Substance Log on 5/11/26 revealed the following:- No outgoing signature on 3/2/26 at 1900, 3/4/26 at 1500, 2/19/26 at 1500, 3/25/26 at 1500, 3/25/26 at 2300, 3/26/26 at 1900, 4/18/26 at 1900, 4/21/26 at1500, and on 4/30/26 at 1930.- No incoming signature on 1/23/26 at 2300, 3/3/26 at an unknown time, 3/4/26 at 0700, 2/19/26 at 0700, 3/25/26 at 1500, and on 4/10/26 at 0715.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately ensure medications and biologics were stored at appropriate temperatures in 3 of 3 refrigerators observed for 3 of 3 months of medication refrigerator logs reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure treatments were stored properly for 2 of 4 days of survey. (5/11/26 and 5/12/26) Findings: 1. On 5/11/26 at 11:05 a.m., during an observation of Resident #17's room, a medicine cup containing an unknown white powder was located on Resident #17's over-the-bed table. During an interview at this time, Resident #17 stated the powder is for his/her rash. On 5/12/26 at 12:56 p.m., the surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 observed a medicine cup containing an unknown white powder located on Resident #17's over-the-bed table. During an interview at this time, LPN #2 stated that she asks the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) which residents need Nystatin powder, and then she gives it to the CNAs to provide the treatments to the residents. The surveyor and LPN #2 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a food mixer, food storage bins, the ceiling, the hood system, a door, and floors; failed to ensure foods were sealed, labeled and/or dated on kitchen carts and in a walk-in freezer for 2 of 2 kitchen/kitchenette tours for 1of 4 days of survey (5/11/26); and failed to ensure Daily High-Temp Ware Wash temperatures, the Freezer and Refrigerator Temperatures, and Sink/Bucket Sanitizer and 3-Bay parts per million(PPM) were monitored/documented for 1 of 4 days of survey. (5/12/26) Additionally, the facility failed to serve food in in sanitary manor for 1 of 4 days of survey. (5/11/26)Findings: Food Storage policy and procedure dated 2023 noted: Procedure: 8. All containers or storage bags must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. 12. Leftover food should be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely and clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. 13.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the Plan of Correction for identified deficiencies from the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process for Federal Recertification, dated 5/14/26, were effective. The Federal citations F584 and F812 were cited again for the same concerns during the follow-up survey completed on 7/7/26.At the annual recertification survey completed on 5/14/26, deficiencies F584 and F812 were cited. During the follow up survey on 7/7/26, it was determined that F584 and F812 would be recited for the same concerns: 1. F584: Safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment: Observation of laundry room on 7/7/26 revealed the surface of the cement floor was worn off and untreated creating an uncleanable surface. There were 15 (fifteen) cracked/broken and/or missing floor tiles. The cove base was missing from the bottom of the wall to the left of the dryers. Review of facility plan of correction, signed 6/11/26, with completion date of 6/26/26 states: The cement floor has been repainted; the cracked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), sanitizing glucometers, linen handling, hand hygiene during resident care, and applying transmission based precaution for 3 of 4 days of survey (5/11/26, 5/12/26, 5/13/26). Additionally, the facility failed to conduct an annual review of its Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). Findings: 1.Observation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) room [ROOM NUMBER] on 5/13/25 at 9:50 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)#7 was observed opening the door with her ungloved, left hand, and holding a full trash bag in her ungloved right hand. CNA#7 was not wearing a gown. At this time a surveyor asked CNA#7 if she had been wearing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and facility policy the facility implements, and maintain an effective training program for all staff. Appropriately trained staff can improve resident safety, create a more person-centered environment, and reduce the number of adverse events or other resident complications. This has the potential to affect all three units.Findings:Review of facility policy Orientation Program dated 5/12/08 states It is the policy of North Country Associated is to provide all new staff members with a comprehensive orientation resulting in an in-depth knowledge of our established policies and procedures. The Administrator will ensure that each new staff member receives and follows the facility's Orientation Program: Objectives: to familiarize the new staff member with the entire facility; To introduce the new staff to the specific policies and procedures of the facility; to assure that the new staff member is able to perform all necessary functions relating to his/her respective job description. WITHOUT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call bell was within reach for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #5, #51) for 2 of 4 days of survey (5/11/26, 5/12/26).Findings:1. On 5/11/26 at 9:28 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #5 asleep in his/her bed with his/her call bell hanging between the top of his/her mattress and headboard, extending to the floor and not within Resident #5's reach.A review of Resident #5's care plan states, .High risk for falls r/t [related to] balance issues, history of falls . Call bell in reach at all times .On 5/12/26 at 9:09 a.m., during a repeat observation, Resident #5 was lying in bed with his/her call light hanging behind his/her bed, extending down to the floor, out of Resident #5's reach.2. On 5/11/26 at 8:50 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #51 sitting on the side of his/her bed, with call light cord tucked between the mattress and the wall. The surveyor could not locate the call bell itself.A review of Resident #51's care plan states, . Fall History: At risk for falls . Call light within reach, instruct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of protected health information for 1 of 70 residents during 1 of 4 days of survey. (Resident #38)Findings:On 5/12/26 from 2:41 p.m. to 2:43 p.m., 2 surveyors observed an open computer screen showing Resident #38's personal medical information on an unattended treatment cart on the Tuttle Unit. It was visible and easily accessible to residents, visitors, and unauthorized personnel. Upon surveyor intervention, the Tuttle Unit Manager walked over to the treatment cart and closed the computer screen at 2:43 p.m On 5/13/26 at 8:20 a.m., the above information was confirmed with the Facility Administrator.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 facility-reported incidents (Resident #27).Finding:Facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 10/18 states, under section E. Investigation, .Procedure: The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately. A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. The information gathered is given to administration. Investigation of injuries of Unknown Origin or Suspicious injuries: The facility may initially evaluate an occurrence to determine whether it meets the definition of an 'alleged violation'. upon discovery of an injury, the facility must immediately take steps to evaluate whether the injury meets the definition of an injury of unknown source.On 2/21/26 at 1:10 p.m., the State of Maine's Division of Licensing and Certification (DLC) received a facility-reported incident that indicated that staff was providing care to Resident #27 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Version 3.0 Assessments were accurately coded in the area of therapy services for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #38).Finding:Review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed a physician order with a start date of 2/9/26 for OT (Occupational Therapy) for a duration of 12 weeks.Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Version 3.0 assessment, dated 2/24/26, Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, under O0390 Therapy Services indicated None of the above.On 5/14/26 at 12:32 p.m. a surveyor discussed the finding with the MDS Coordinator. At this time, the MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident #38's clinical record and confirmed that Resident #38 was receiving OT services at the time of the 2/24/26 quarterly assessment and confirmed that the assessment was not accurately coded.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed in the area of quality of care and accurate for opioid therapy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. (#77) Findings:Review of Resident #77's medical record stated he/she was admitted in April 2026 with a diagnosis of displaced trimalleolar fracture of right lower leg, fracture of unspecified metatarsal bone(s) left foot and encounter for other orthopedic aftercare. On 4/1/26, the nurse to nurse report between the facility and the hospital noted under admitting diagnosis to include Displaced trimalleolar fracture of right lower leg, Fracture of unspecified metatarsal bone(s) left foot and Encounter for other orthopedic aftercare.On 4/1/26, Resident #77 signed an Informed Acknowledgement and Agreement for Opioid Therapy form on 4/1/26 declining the use of Opioid Therapy.On review of the Resident #77's base line care plan, the care plan lacked evidence of the problem, goals and interventions for the resident's diagnosis of fractures/breaks. Additionally, Resident #77 had been care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was accurate and complete for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for therapy services (Resident #85) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident #17).Findings: 1. Resident #85 was admitted 5/26 for skilled care services. Review of Resident #85 active orders revealed order with start date of 5/5/26 for PT- Treatment Clarification orders: Therapeutic Exercise: Therapeutic Activities: Gait training: Neuro re-education; wheelchair management. Frequency 60 Duration 12 weeks order with start date of 5/5/26 for PT: Evaluate and Treat were both unsigned. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 11:09 a.m., the Occupational Therapist (OT) confirmed Resident #85 has been receiving physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) services 5 days a week, and they have a restorative aide on weekends. At this time OT reviewed Resident #85's clinical record and confirmed the orders were not signed by a provider. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee education review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and ensure that the CNA attended the required 12 hours of annual in-service education training for 1 of 5 randomly selected CNAs employed greater than 1 year. (CNA #1)Finding:CNA #1 was hired in February of 2025. Review of CNA #1 Employee In-service/attendance records lacked evidence of the required 12 hours of continuing education from 2/2025 to 2/2026. On 5/14/26 at 2:36 p.m., during an interview with the Facility Administrator, the above information was confirmed.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection relating to Legionella and failed to implement the elements of the Legionella Water Management Program. This has the potential to affect all 68 residents. Findings: 1. The facility's Legionella Water Management Program revised on 1/9/25, under Control Measures states, Various control measures are in place to ensure a healthy water management program. Please refer to Appendix A of the water management program for a description of where controls are located. Monitoring states, monitoring provides data for determining whether a water system is operating within the parameters needed to control the growth of Legionella. Please refer to Appendix A of the water management program for the description of how monitoring will be conducted. Market Square receives its water from Maine Water . Maine Water uses a Total Chlorine system so the facility will use a Total Chlorine testing kit to take water samples. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units ([NAME] East, [NAME] and Tuttle) for 1 of 1 facility tour. Findings: On 3/5/25 from 8:30 a.m. to 9:15 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Environmental Tour with the Environmental Services Director and the Quality Improvement Specialist, in which the following findings were observed: [NAME] East > There was an EZ sit-to-stand patient lift, in the hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER], that had food debris and dirt in the foot base area. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall behind bed 2 had chipped/missing paint and was marred with black marks. The base board heater front cover was off at the end of the bed exposing heating elements. Resident #32's grabber/reacher was coated with a thick brown substance on the grabber part and the entire handle. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The room was very cold and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to a resident, known family member and/or legal representative for 3 of 3 sampled residents who had been transferred to the hospital (Residents #7, #66, and #69). Findings: 1. Resident #7's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on 5/23/24 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #7 and/or the resident representative were provided with a written bed hold notices upon transfer. 2. Resident #69's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #69 and/or the resident representative were provided with a written bed hold notices upon transfer. 3. Documentation in Resident #66's clinical record indicated that he/she transferred to an acute care hospital on 1/18/25 and subsequently admitted . The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #67 was recently admitted to the facility. A review of the nursing assessments, dated 2/11/25 for Resident Smoking Screen and a Resident Smoking Contract state he/she can smoke unsupervised. As of 3/3/25 the residents' care plan lacked interventions and goals relating to smoking. On 3/3/25 at 4:01 p.m., the above was discussed with the Quality Improvement Specialists Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours. That included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 3 of 25 care plans reviewed (Resident's (R)4, R55, and R67). Findings: Review of policy 48 Hour Baseline Care Plan dated 10/18 states a baseline care plan will be created within 48 hours of admission. Based on the admission assessment, physician orders and resident preferences a care plan will be created to facilitate a smooth transition of care and to provide effective, person care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for 2 of 2 units reviewed for medication storage (East and [NAME] Units). Findings: 1. Review of East Wing Med Cart Controlled Substance Log on 3/5/24 at 11:55 a.m., revealed the following: - No outgoing signature on 3/1/25 at 6:30 a.m., 3/2/25 at 6:30 a.m., 2/14/25, 2/21/24, 1/24/25, 1/20/25, 12/23/24, 12/30/24, at 7:00 a.m., 1/23/25 at 6:30 a.m., 1/18/15 at 5:00 a.m., 1/7/25 at 8:00 a.m., or 12/26/24 unknown time. - No incoming signature on 2/13/25 at 7:00 a.m., 1/27/24 at 11:30 p.m., or 12/24/24 at 11:15 p.m., 2. Review of East Wind Treatment Cart Controlled Substance Long on 3/5/25 at 12:30 p.m., revealed: -no incoming signature on 1/29/25 at 11:00 p.m. -no outgoing signature on 1/15/25 at 7:15 p.m., 11:00 p.m., 2/2/25 11:00 p.m, 2/7/25 no time noted. 3. Review of [NAME] Wing Controlled Substance Log revealed: -No outgoing signature on 2/20/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for floors, the food disposal unit, a wall mounted fan, and a plunger. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure foods were sealed, labeled, dated and/or discarded if past use by date in a reach-in freezer, in a walk-in refrigerator, a unit kitchenette refrigerator and in a dry storage room for 2 of 2 kitchen/kitchenette tours for 1 of 1 day of survey (3/3/25). Findings: The facility's Food Storage policy and procedure dated 2023 noted: 13. Refrigerated food storage: f. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated and routinely monitored to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their use by dates, or frozen(where applicable) or discarded. 14. Frozen foods: c. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods will be consumed by their use by dates or discarded. 1. On 3/3/25 from 8:40 a.m. to 9:40 a.m., a surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a clinical record contained complete and accurate documentation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident's #55 #67), and for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication review (Resident #45 and #55). Findings: 1. On 3/3/25 at 9:16 a.m., during an interview, Resident #67, stated he/she smokes cigarettes independently outside approximately 4-5 times a day and he/she stores the lighter and cigarettes in his/her room. A review of the nursing assessment dated [DATE] for Resident Smoking Screen states, Resident smoking status based upon above information is: Non-smoker, Supervised smoker or Unsupervised neither of the 3 choices listed are checked. The section stating, Include in nursing care plan & interdisciplinary resident care plan. 30 day assessment: Resident can smoke unsupervised has yes checked. A review of the Resident Smoking Contract states, I have read and understand the resident smoking policy. Please check one of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure accommodations were made for a resident to include the facility's bathing schedule and resident preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #7). Finding: On 3/4/25 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview, Resident #7 stated that he/she wants to and is supposed to get a shower twice a week, on Sundays and Wednesdays. But due to staffing, he/she no longer gets a shower consistently. He/she stated that staff will come in and tell him/her that he/she will be getting a bed bath instead. On 3/4/25 at 9:40 a.m., observation of the weekly shower schedule indicated Resident #7 was to receive a shower on Sunday and Wednesday early evenings. On 3/4/25 at 9:48 a.m., in an interview and review of Resident 7's February 2025 bathing documentation, the Quality Improvement Specialist(QIS) confirmed that Resident #7's bathing documentation lacked evidence that he/she received showers on 2/5/25, 2/9/25, 2/12/25, 2/23/25 and 2/26/25. The QIS additionally confirmed that there was no documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions for diuretic and anticoagulant medication use for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for (Resident #11). Findings: Review of policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning dated 1/19 states: The facility must develop and implement person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, . needs identified in the comprehensive assessment evaluation. Review of Resident #11 (R11) active medication orders, dated March 2025 revealed: - order with start date of 4/27/24 for anticoagulant Eliquis 5mg tablet two times daily for atrial fibrillation - order with start date of 11/30/24 for diuretic Lasix 20 mg tablet 1 time daily for atrial fibrillation. Review of R11's care plan, updated 11/15/24, lacked evidence that goals and interventions were put into place for the use of diuretic and anticoagulant medications. On 3/4/25 10:15 a.m., Dduring a review of R11's care plan with Quality Improvement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents for (Resident #67). Finding: On 3/3/25 Resident #67's clinical record was reviewed and included several physician orders for wound care instructing nursing to: Right shoulder: Cleanse with Vashe solution soaked gauze applied to wound bed and left in place for 5 minutes. Apply skin prep spray to periwound. Apply Kaltostat to high draining areas (center of wound bed). Apply generous amount of Medihoney to rest of wound bed. Cover with fluffed dry gauze to fill the wound cavity. Cover with dry gauze and ABD (abdominal pad). Secure with Hypafix tape Change daily and PRN (as needed). Anterior neck: Cleanse with Vashe solution soaked gauze applied to wound bed and left in place for 5 minutes. Apply skin prep spray to periwound. Apply Medihoney and moist gauze to wound. Apply dry gauze to cover. Secure with Hypafix tape Change daily and PRN. Lateral neck: Cleanse with Vashe solution soaked gauze applied to wound bed and left in place for 5 minutes. Apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #29). Finding: Resident #29 has diagnoses to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On 3/3/25 at 11:31 a.m. and 3/4/25 at 1:49 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #29's, unbagged nasal cannula tubing, draped on top of the oxygen concentrator located next to the bed, with the nasal cannula prongs in direct contact with the surface of the oxygen concentrator. An empty plastic storage bag was observed tied to the nightstand drawer handle. Review of Resident #29's clinical record revealed an active order, dated 2/10/25, for Change tubing one time weekly .change all oxygen tubing . and an active order, dated 2/10/25 for Clean/store oxygen tubing not in use .Place in plastic bag when not in use. Review of Resident #29's care plan, dated 2/10/25, revealed, Change oxygen tubing weekly; label and date . On 3/4/25 at 2:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (prn) psychotropic medication met the required 14-day limit for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident #4 and #67). Findings: 1. Resident #4's medical record contained a provider order, dated 2/13/25, for Diazepam 5 mg (milligram) tablet PRN(as needed) every 8 hours for muscle spasms, with no stop date. The medical record lacked evidence of clinical rational to continue the medication. On 3/5/25 at 2:17 p.m., the above was confirmed with the Assistant Director of Nursing 2. Resident #67's medical record contained a provider order, dated 2/11/25, for Lorazepam 1 mg (milligram) tablet Oral as Needed One Time for anxiety disorder prior to wound change, with no stop date. The medical record lacked evidence of clinical rational to continue the medication. On 3/5/25 at 1:16 p.m., the above was discussed with the Quality Improvement Specialist.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications including treatments were stored properly for 2 of 3 days of survey (3/3/25 and 3/4/25). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for medications located at a resident's bedside, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #322). Findings: Review of Facility Policy Self-Administration of Medications, dated 5/2018, states, .residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team [IDT] has determined that the practice would be safe .and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer .an assessment is conducted by the IDT .the results of the IDT assessment .are recorded .on the care plan . Review of policy, Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated 5/2018, states, .administer medication and remain with resident while medication is swallowed .Do not leave medications at bedside . During observations on 3/3/25 at 10:27 a.m. and 3/4/25 at 9:55 a.m., a 0.5 fluid ounce bottle of thera tears lubricant eye drops…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to reflect the resident's current care needs in the area of falls for 1of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). Finding: Facility policy, Falls Management Policy, states, Residents' care plan will be updated with all new interventions . Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed he/she sustained a fall on 10/14/24, 10/16/24, 11/19/24, and 12/1/24. Review of Resident #4's care plan, updated on 11/12/24, revealed, Problems: .requires extensive assistance with self-care .inability to perform ADLs independently . Further review of Resident #4's care plan lacked evidence of goals and interventions for falls. On 12/19/24 at 2:19 p.m., during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Administrator stated it is her expectation that the resident care plan would be updated after a fall. On 12/19/24 at 5:37 p.m., during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reviewed the entire clinical record and confirmed that Resident #4's care plan was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Residents #4 and #5). Findings: Facility policy, Falls Management Policy, revised July 2019, states, .E. Complete the Post Fall Observation Tool, following a fall .F. Documentation must be completed in the nurse's note on each shift x 3 following the fall . 1. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed he/she sustained falls on 10/14/24, 10/16/24, 11/19/24, and 12/1/2024. The medical record lacked evidence that the Post Fall Observation Tool was completed for the 10/14/24, 10/16/24, or 12/1/24 falls. Further review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed the following progress notes: -11/29/24 at 8:41 p.m., CNA called this nurse to resident's room. Resident found lying on the floor beside her bed . -12/2/24 at 9:25 a.m., Yelling heard by nursing staff with original origin unknown. Upon arrival of CNA staff resident observed holding self up on opposite bed in room. Resident lowered to floor by CNA staff .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development of infection for 1 of 3 sampled residents. (Resident 3) Findings: Review of policy Oxygen Use & Storage Policy dated 10/24 states Respiratory Care: A sanitary environment must be maintained to prevent the transmission of disease. When nebulizer parts are not in use, after [NAME] air dried, the mask and/or hand held devices shold be stored in a plastiv bag to the risk of it becoming contaminated . During observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/19/24 at 10:13 a.m., and 12:15 p.m., the following was observed: -an unbagged bedpan was observed on the bathroom floor. -an unused catheter bag dated 12/17 was observed in a cardboard box containing pudding cups belonging to Resident 3. -a nebulizer was observed on bedside table. The apparatus was apart and left on top of the bedside table. Nebulizer tubing was observed rolled up and in a pink wash basin containing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's laundry equipment was maintained, according to manufacturer's instructions, and operated to ensure proper cleaning and disinfecting of linens for 1 of 1 day of survey(11/5/24). This has the potential to affect all residents. Findings: On 11/5/24, review of Documentation provided by the facility from Patriot [laundry chemical supply company] noted: Stain treatments: > B-Gone grease and oil remover wash in hot water, 140 degrees Fahrenheit[F]for colors and 165°F for whites. > Blood and stain remover wash in hot water 140°F for colors and 165° for white. > For washing machines and nursing homes, especially when dealing with various products like > Patriot Frontier Soap[detergent], Patriot Frontier Bleach, Patriot Powerhouse[heavy duty detergent], Patriot Ultra Soft[ fabric softener], and Patriot Stain Away[stain remover], the temperature requirements are generally based on the need to disinfect linens and properly activate the chemicals in the detergents and bleach. Here's a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, the facility's Daily High-Temp Ware Wash checklist directions, the facility's Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Logs and the facility's Sink/Bucket Sanitizer Log directions, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for wall mounted air conditioning units, the floors, a plunger, a dish air dry machine, a grease trap, a wall vent, a ceiling light and a walk-in freezer. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in refrigerator/freezer temperatures were monitored; failed to ensure the dishwasher temperatures were monitored; failed to ensure the sink/buckets sanitizers were monitored and failed to ensure food was properly labeled and dated in the walk-in freezer for 1 of 1 kitchen tour for 1 of 1 day of survey (10/7/24). Findings: Review of the facility's Daily High-Temp Ware Wash checklist directions noted: Notify food service director if there are any standards that are out of compliance parentheses I dot E dot wash temperatures that are less than 150° or rinse temperatures that are less than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the small and large steam tables were maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 2 of 2 kitchen tours (10/7/24). Findings: 1. On 10/7/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m., the surveyor observed a small steam table in the middle of the kitchen that had a broken electrical plug end and was plugged into an outlet and also observed a large steam table against a wall that had the electrical plug end cut off of it. In an interview, both the dietary aide and the cook stated that they still use the steam tables to serve food to the residents in the dining areas. The surveyor asked how long the small steam table had a broken plug and how long the large steam table was missing the plug end. The dietary aide and the cook were not sure how long the plug had been broken on the small steam table but they stated maintenance did know about it and they had a part for it. The dietary aide stated that it hadn't worked properly for a while and didn't always heat up consistently like it was supposed to. She also stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-03 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 dietary food service workers had the appropriate competencies and were adequately trained around knowing the proper temperatures for foods served to residents. This has the potential to affect all 45 residents in the facility. Findings: Review of facility provided policy No [NAME] in the Kitchen undated states, Staff other than the dietary staff will know how to prepare a meal in case there is an immediate emergency in the kitchen.Non dietary staff will be oriented to basic kitchen operations. Choose a few people from each dept who cross-train to learn basic kitchen procedures. Orient those cross-trained staff to: Temperature taking and documentation; ie. cooking and cold and hot holding temps During an interview on 8/1/22 at 9:35 a.m., Dietary Aide indicated that she has had no training regarding food safety and does not know what temperatures would be safe to serve food. During a lunch meal preparation observation on 8/2/22 at 11:15 a.m. the fill in cook indicated that she had not received education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated/implemented for side rails for 1 of 1 Resident (#12), smoking for 1 of 1 Resident's (#35) and in the area of dental for 1 of 1 Resident (#41) of 17 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning dated 1/19 states, The facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with Resident Rights, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment/evaluation .a comprehensive care plan must be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spinal fusion, lumbar region, respiratory failure, spinal stenosis, Parkinson's disease, and arthritis. Observations of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of open biologicals according to manufacturer specifications and expired medications in 2 of 3 units, [NAME] East and [NAME] West. Findings: 1. On 8/1/22 at 2:38 p.m., during review of [NAME] East medication storage fridge with the Register Nurse (RN), an opened multi use vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (TB) labeled with an opened date of 6/13/22 was observed with manufactures directions of once opened vial should be discarded after 30 days. 2. On 8/1/22 at 2:47 p.m., during review of [NAME] medication storage fridge with the RN, an opened multi use vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (TB) labeled with an opened date of 6/26/22 with manufactures directions of Discard opened product after 30 days and an opened box of Bisacodyl Suppositories with expiration date of 5/2022 were observed. On 8/1/22 at 3:05 p.m., the above was confirmed with the Director of Nursing 3. On 8/2/22 at 8:35 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean/sanitary environment on 2 or 3 wings observed ([NAME] East and [NAME] West) for 3 of 3 days of survey. Findings: 1. On 8/1/22, 8/2/22 and 8/3/22 the following was observed on [NAME] East: -room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5 shared bathroom had a 2 basins on the floor, on either side of the toilet and a unlabeled urinal hanging on the hand rail. -room [ROOM NUMBER] and 6 shared bathroom had an unlabeled bed pan on the floor with a basin in it, another unlabeled bed pan on the floor with a plastic bag, an unlabeled urinal on the back of the toilet and a basin stored on top of the paper towel dispenser and - On 8/1/22 and 8/2/22 room [ROOM NUMBER] and 9 shared bathroom had an unlabeled bariatric bed pan and a commode cover stored on the floor behind the toilet. 2. On 8/1/22, 8/2/22 and 8/3/22 the following was observed on [NAME] West: -room [ROOM NUMBER] and 27 shared bathroom had 2 unlabeled bed pans stored on the floor next to the toilet. -room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was updated in the care area of Nutrition for 1 of 17 resident care plans reviewed. (#2) Finding: Resident #2's clinical record revealed a physician diet order dated 5/17/22 for a Fluid Restriction 2000 milliliters, Reduce Sodium 2 grams. The plan of care was reviewed on 7/29/22 during the interdisciplinary team meeting that states Continue current plan of care and meet again next quarter. As of 8/2/22 the current care plan was not updated to reflect the new physician instructions. On 8/2/22 at 11:11 a.m. in an interview, a surveyor confirmed with the Director of Nursing that the care plan was not updated to reflect the current nutritional needs for the resident.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to follow physician order for wound evaluation and failed to follow the facilities Skin Management policy for 1 of 1 Resident reviewed for pressure ulcer management. (#20) Findings: Skin Management Program Policy, revised 2/20 states, Each resident will be assessed for the risk of developing skin breakdown or pressure ulcers and will receive the care and services to prevent pressure ulcers or to heal existing pressure ulcers. Skin risk assessments will be done using weekly skin assessment . Section B. Upon identification of a risk or presence of a pressure ulcer, the following will be initiated: a. a pain assessment will be completed b. a treatment will be established per physician order c. A care plan will be initiated or updated. Section C. Daily documentation of: a. the site b. dressing status and/or surrounding skin areas if the site is covered c. Weekly wound measurements by a registered nurse. d. Care plan will be reviewed and updated based on assessed outcomes. Review of Resident #20's medical record indicated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-08-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Sets, version 3.0 (MDS) was accurately coded for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking (Resident #35) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for restraints. (Resident #12). Findings: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spinal fusion, lumbar region, respiratory failure, spinal stenosis, Parkinson's disease, and arthritis. Review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] section P states Restraints: used less than daily. Review of Resident #12's Side Rail Assessment dated 3/13/21 states, [He/She] resident has requested side rails while in bed side rails are indicated and serve as an enhancer to promote independence. Side rails are not indicated at this time. During an interview on 8/2/22 at 11:59 a.m., The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed section P: Restraints was incorrectly coded for Resident #12. 2. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of nicotine dependence.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-08-03 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a training/education program which includes dementia training by failing to ensure that 2 of 5 staff reviewed for in-service training completed the required training. (Employee #4 and #5). On 8/2/22 during a review of the facility staff education records the following was noted: Employee #4 was hired on 7/15/22 and as of 8/2/22 his record lacks evidence of dementia training. Employee #5 was hired on 7/12/22 and as of 8/2/22 her record lacks evidence of dementia training. On 8/2/22 at approximately 2:55 p.m. in an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services, she confirmed that employee #4 and employee #5 did not receive dementia training since being hired. She stated that both employees work with dementia Residents and that both employees are scheduled to have the dementia training this month.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORESTIS, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 11/15/2014 |
| CYR, GLEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $519K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205076. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.