Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.81 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident comprehensive care plan (placement of pillow behind the neck to reduce/prevent contractures) for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for care plan implementation, resulting in the potential for breathing complications and increased contractures.Findings include:Resident #7: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition were the lungs fail to oxygenate the blood for tissues) intracranial hemorrhage (serious type of stroke, bleeding in the skull), and contracture (muscles, tendons, joints and other tissue tighten or shorten causing a deformity) of muscle of both hands and neck. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #7, revised on 9/17/21, revealed the focus, .(Resident #7) has a tracheostomy tube (a hollow tube inserted into a surgically created opening in the neck and windpipe to keep the airway open) and is at risk for occlusion of patent airway (blockage of a clear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity during meals and ensure residents are treated with respect in 3 of 5 residents (Resident #13, #56, & #21) reviewed for dignity/respect, resulting in the potential for feelings of embarrassment, frustration, and impaired self-worth. Findings include: Time management, therapeutic communication, patient education, and compassionate implementation of bedside skills are just a few of the essential skills you need. It is important for your patients to leave the health care setting with a positive image of nursing and a feeling that they received quality care. Your patients should never feel rushed. They need to feel that they are important and are involved in decisions and that their needs are met. [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 1589-1592). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition. In an interview on 11/19/24 at 11:04 AM, Confidential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with fingernail grooming/hygiene for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #21 and #19) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's), resulting in the potential for diminished dignity, alteration in skin integrity, nail infection. Findings include: Resident #21 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: stroke (damage to brain causing paralysis of left side of body). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21, with a reference date of 9/27/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #21 had moderate cognitive impairment. Reveiw of Resident #21's Care Plan with a 9/16/21 start date revealed, .requires assistance with ADLs related to chronic disease progression r/t (related to) comorbidities, fatigue, weakness . In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that thorough documentation of a death in the facility was completed and fingernail issues were recorded for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #113 ) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records, resulting in insufficient details related to death in the facility for Resident #113. Findings include: Resident #113 Review of Resident #113's Flow Sheets dated [DATE] at 5:11 AM indicated, date of death [DATE] at 4:25 AM. Review of Resident #113's discharged as deceased Summary dated [DATE] at 12:13 PM revealed, .history of stroke, .multiple hospitalizations for sepsis and infections and progressive decline in the nine months preceding his passing. He passed away on [DATE] . Review of Resident #113's Nurse's Note dated [DATE] at 5:36 AM revealed, Contacted resident's daughter via phone. Explained to her what happened. She became very upset and hang (sic) up. Will try to call her back to get information. In an interview on [DATE] at 01:08…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00142952. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect facility staff did not follow a resident care plan to prevent falls to the State Agency for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for continued violations involving neglect and/or abuse going undetected, unreported, or without thorough investigation. Findings include: Review of Resident #103's Care Plan revealed, Problem: .at risk for falls: Start Date: 10/24/23 .INTERVENTIONS: .See Resident Care Summary (RCS) .PROBLEM: .requires assistance with mobility. Start Date: 10/24/23 .INTERVENTIONS: .See RCS. Review of Resident #103's RCS revealed, .Transfer: Dependent: Lift - Sit to Stand. Review of Resident #103's Fall Report dated 10/29/24 at 3:15 PM revealed, .IDT (interdisciplinary team) met and reviewed a witnessed/assisted fall where the POC (plan of care) was not followed. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was transferring resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00142952 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions, and perform safe transfers in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall and the potential for harm. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #103 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: weakness, chronic pain of both lower extremities, and left foot fracture. Review of Resident #103's Fall Risk Assessment dated 10/24/23 indicated a moderate risk for falls. In an interview on 6/28/24 at 8:43 AM, Family Member F reported that Resident #103 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following a fall at home where he had fractured his foot. Review of Resident #103's Care Plan revealed, Problem: .at risk for falls: Start Date: 10/24/23 .INTERVENTIONS: .See Resident Care Summary (RCS) .PROBLEM: .requires assistance with mobility. Start Date: 10/24/23 .INTERVENTIONS:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of care and provide timely incontinence care in 2 of 4 residents (Resident #106 and #108) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence, resulting in an increased risk for UTI (urinary tract infection) and the potential for skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident #106 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #106 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of Resident #106's Resident Care Summary revealed, 11/28/23: .Skin Care Precautions: Cream - Barrier .Toileting: bladder incontinent, bowel incontinent .Dependent (resident unable to help) . During an observation on 1/31/24 at 11:34 AM Resident #106 was in his room, sitting in a geri chair (used for those with mobility issues, that have difficulty sitting upright in a conventional wheelchair) next to his bed. There was a mechanical hoyer lift sling underneath…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent skin breakdown for residents at risk for pressure ulcers, for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #106 and #108) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, resulting in the potential for the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer, infection, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Resident #106 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #106 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of Resident #106's Resident Care Summary revealed, 11/28/23: .Bed Mobility: Dependent assist x 2 .Toileting: bladder incontinent, bowel incontinent .Dependent .Skin Care and Precautions: 11/28/23 Cream - barrier, specialty mattress . There were no other interventions related to pressure ulcer prevention. Review of Resident #106's Braden Score (for predicting pressure ulcer risk) dated 1/10/24 indicated 11, high risk. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00142371 and #MI00142124. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #101, #108 and #109) reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for serious injury from a fall when care plan interventions were not implemented for bed mobility. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of Resident #101's Resident Care Summary (care guide for direct care givers) revealed, High Fall Risk .1/10/24 Safety: Bed low, Orientation: Unable to makes needs known .Bed Mobility (moving from one bed position to another): Dependent (resident unable to help at all) assist x 2 (requires 2 people to safely perform task) .Toileting: .Dependent assist x 2 . Review of Resident #101's Fall Risk Assessment dated 1/9/24 indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe infection control practices in regard to hand hygiene (glove use), and consistently implement enhanced barrier precautions in 3 of 4 residents (Resident #106, #108 & #109) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the development and spread of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Findings include: The following residents (Resident #106, #108, and #109) were all in the same room. During repeated observations from 1/31/24-2/1/24 at 3:10 PM, the door signage indicated, enhanced barrier precautions in place and N95 mask use was required during nebulizer (breathing) treatments. Review of Resident #106's Resident Care Summary indicated no precautions in place. Review of Resident #108's Resident Care Summary indicated no precautions in place. Review of Resident #109's Resident Care Summary revealed, 10/2/22, Initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Continuous. During an observation on 1/31/24 at 1:23 PM in Resident #108's room, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) S…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COREWELL HEALTH — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MI