Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center -

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 153 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 97.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.47 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2568667.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications without adequate indication for use and without resident monitoring in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #101) reviewed for psychotropic medications, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy when on [DATE] Resident #101 was prescribed a psychotropic medication, who then sustained a fall with a impacted acetabulum (hip socket) and pelvic fracture on [DATE] and subsequent death. Findings include: Resident #101 was prescribed lorazepam daily beginning [DATE]. Resident #101 had falls on 5/12, 5/20, and 5/28 with no major injury after no falls since February admission. No monitoring for or recognition of adverse consequences from psychotropic medications occurred after these falls. On [DATE], Resident #101 fell while ambulating and sustained impacted acetabulum and pelvic fractures, was hospitalized , and died as a result of the fall per the medical examiner.The Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-10-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2614764Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained their right to self-determination in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #100) reviewed for choices, resulting in frustration with not being able to go to sleep at a preferred bedtime, an altercation with staff and a left fractured humerus. Findings include: Resident #100: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included chronic pain, contracture of the left upper arm, debility, stroke, paralysis affecting left side, and dementia. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #100, revised on 3/24/25, revealed the focus, .(Resident #100) may refuse to return to her room for incontinence care or go to bed at a reasonable time. with the intervention .Assess decision making ability.Provide a consistent daily routine.Environmental precautions (confusion).Assess for mood changes.Reality orientation as needed. Review of Event Summary Report dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00147147 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety and provide monitoring and/or supervision while eating in of 4 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for safety and supervision, resulting in Resident #1 choking on food and subsequent death. Findings: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Dementia with behavioral disturbances, oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and a history of larynx cancer. R1 was his own responsible party (able to make his own decisions). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R1, with a reference date of 6/3/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R1 was cognitively impaired. The medical record revealed R1 was a full code (resuscitation and all life saving measure in the event of a medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen/kitchenettes' food contact and/or non-food contact surfaces were consistently maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to consistently date, label, and discard food items appropriately with the potential to effect any resident out of the census of 98 who consumed food/beverages from the kitchen resulting in the potential for foodborne illness, physical food contamination, and/or pest issues.Findings include:Food Contact and/or Non-Food Contact Surfaces Not Maintained in a Clean and Sanitary Manner by Area:Ice Machines-During an observation and interview on 04/14/2026 at 9:29 AM, the ice machine in the kitchen had unknown black, orange, and pink material accumulated on the exterior of the white ice chute. Maintenance Staff F reported the ice machines of the kitchen were cleaned by a third-party vendor, he thought cleaning was done approximately bi-annually (twice a year), and ice machines were last cleaned approximately around the time of late January/early February (2026).During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor food preferences for 1 (Resident #121) of 20 sampled residents reviewed for food preferences resulting in feelings of frustration and anger.Findings include:Resident #121Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #121 was a female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord leading to a loss of muscle control, including muscle weakness, difficulty speaking, swallowing and eventually breathing), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and vegetarian (a person who does not eat meat).In an interview on 4/14/26 at 10:32 AM, Resident #121 reported she requested yogurt to be served at every meal, and she was not getting it. Resident #121 reported she and Family Member (FM) TT had both spoken to Registered Dietitian (RD) I regarding her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2568667Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications for 1 of 7 (Resident #101) residents reviewed for psychotropic medications, resulting in the resident/resident representative's inability to make decisions on risk vs benefit of medication use and alternative treatment options. Findings include: Resident #101:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a female who was admitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included severe late onset Alzheimer's dementia with agitation, ground level fall, insomnia, and depression.Review of all Care Plans for Resident #101, revealed no focus or interventions for the use of psychotropic medications with monitoring for adverse consequences. Review of Order dated 5/9/25 for Resident #101, revealed, .Lorazepam (Ativan) tablet 0.5 mg Oral, nightly, Associated Diagnosis: Other insomnia. Review of Order dated 5/29/25 for Resident #101, revealed, .Lorazepam…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions and the facility policy to prevent falls in 1 of 7 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for fall prevention, resulting in the potential for falls and injury. Findings includeResident #102:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, confusion, incontinence, reduced mobility, fall risk, and end stage Alzheimer's disease. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #102, revised on 9/5/2025, revealed the focus, .(Resident #102) does not want to experience a fall resulting in major injury. with the intervention .Bed in low position.Accompany resident (ex. 1:1, stand by assist, dayroom monitoring, 15 min checks, line of sight).Visual checks per facility policy. Review of Resident Care Summary dated 9/8/25, revealed, .Safety: Bed by all for increased floor space.Fall mattress next to open side of bed for increased protection from injury.Review of Event Summary Report dated 9/5/25, revealed, .Safety: Bed by wall for increased floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the risk of urinary tract infection and ensure urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag were not resting on the floor in 2 of 2 residents (Resident #102, #105) reviewed for urinary catheter use, resulting in the potential of a urinary tract infection.Findings include: .A CAUTI (Catheter associated urinary tract infection), or a UTI associated with a catheter, is common if you have an indwelling catheter inside your urethra.Symptoms are similar to a general UTI and include bloody or cloudy urine, gritty particles or mucus in your urine, urine with a strong odor, pain in your lower back, chills and fever. (https://www.healthline.com/health/sediment-in-urine)Resident #103: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included stroke and gross hematuria (blood in urine). During an observation on 09/24/25 at 2:32 PM, Resident #103 was observed lying in his bed, bed was low to the ground, and his catheter bag was on the floor without a barrier under it.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen, at 10:32 AM on 3/3/25, an interview with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) Z found that the maintenance staff takes care of the ice machine cleanings and has a vendor that comes and deep cleans the machines. Observation of the dispensing spout of the ice machine found an increase accumulation of black and brown debris on the surface of the inside spout. During a tour of the main kitchen, at 10:35 AM on 3/3/25, observation of the microwave found increase accumulation of debris on the inside top portion of the unit. Further review of the unit found chipping and degrading surfaces on the inside. During a tour of the main kitchen, at 10:39 AM on 3/3/25, an interview with CDM Z found that staff clean the utensil drawer weekly. Observation of the three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility. Findings include: During a tour of the facility with, Maintenance K and Regional Maintenance HHH, starting at 9:50 AM on 3/4/25, it was found that Maintenance K is newer to the facility and has not been involved much in the water management plan. When asked if he was aware of regular flushing the facility is doing on minimum use or unused domestic water fixtures, Maintenance K was unaware. Regional Maintenance HHH stated some facilities do a wasting water Wednesday, but he is not sure what's done here. During a tour of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to complete advance directives completely and accurately for 3 residents (Resident #37, Resident #312, Resident #60) of 22 residents reviewed for advance directives resulting in the potential for resident preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility staff. Findings include: Resident #37 (R37) Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pain, paraplegia (loss or impairment of voluntary movement and sensation in the lower half of the body including both legs due to damage to the spinal cord), left lower extremity amputation and a pressure injury (wound) to right buttocks. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R15 was cognitively intact (13 to 15 cognitively intact). Review of R37's physician orders revealed Do not resuscitate (DNR) with a start date of 1/1/2025. Review of R37's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean comfortable environment with clean, sanitized medical equipment for 1 resident (Resident #75) of 2 residents, resulting in the potential for cross contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: Review of Facesheet revealed Resident #75 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included macular degeneration (loss of in the center of the field of vision), legal blindness, dementia, diabetes, anxiety, kidney disease stage 3, neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage), anemia, and stroke. Review of Resident Care Summary dated 3/5/25, revealed, .Safety: Dated 1/24/25 .Low bed, bed by wall for increased floor space, bedside mat .Lay down between meals so he doesn't slid (sic) out of w/c (wheelchair) .Dependent for transfers, bed mobility . During an observation on 03/03/25 at 09:52 AM, Resident #75 was observed lying in bed with a mattress on the floor placed next to the right side of his bed. The mattress was covered with spotted dried liquid stains, dried food, and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessments timely for 2 residents (Resident #82, Resident #93) of 2 reviewed for MDS transmission resulting in the potential for inaccurate tracking of discharges. Findings include: Resident #82(R82) Review of R82's chart revealed that she discharged from the facility on 9/19/2024. Review of R82's chart revealed a MDS discharge assessment -return not anticipated with an ARD of 9/20/2024 was in progress and incomplete: GG, J, M, N, O, P (sections GG, J, M, N, O, P). The MDS was not transmitted. Resident #93(R93) Review of R93's chart revealed that she discharged from the facility on 9/17/2024. Review of R93's chart revealed a MDS discharge assessment -return not anticipated with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/17/2024 was in progress and incomplete: K (section K). The MDS was not transmitted. During an interview on 3/05/2025 at 1:23 PM, MDS nurse D stated that a discharge assessment should be completed whenever a resident discharges from the facility. Then, it should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-10-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COREWELL HEALTH — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $326K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI