Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center -

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 145.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.46 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.49 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the standards of infection control for Kangaroo pumps (a portable, electronic medical device used for enteral feeding), and IV poles cleaning for five residents (R1, R2, R25, R47, and R105) of 5 residents reviewed for tube feeding, and oxygen concentrator cleaning for one resident (R118) of 1 resident reviewed for receiving oxygen, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the spread of disease to a vulnerable population.Findings include:R1According to R1's Face Sheet, the resident's diagnoses included skin breakdown at gastrostomy tube site, and presence of gastrostomy for nutrition. Review of R1's Order Summary, printed and provided on 9/8/25 by facility, indicated the resident had a J-tube (a tube inserted into a small part of the stomach) to provide nutrients and medications. Observed on 9/08/2025 at 10:26 AM, R1 had at bedside a Kangaroo pump attached to an IV pole. The pump, pole, and base of pole had splatters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2603853Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents maintained their right to self-determination for 1 (Resident #74) of 1 resident reviewed for choices, resulting in Resident #74 not receiving feeding assistance while others ate around him, missed opportunities to experience joy while eating, and a loss of autonomy.Findings include:Review of Alternative Nutrition and Hydration in Dysphagia Care, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, https://www.[NAME].org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/adult-dysphagia/alternative-nutrition-and-hydration-in-dysphagia-care/, revealed .Recommendations for supplemental feeding may include pleasure feeding. This option is often limited to the patient consuming tastes or small amounts of food types while following clear precautions; pleasure feeding is administered (or taken) to improve quality of life.Patient autonomy, or the right to self-determination, is a key factor in health care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake MI00152599. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect in 2 (Resident #100, Resident #101) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in feelings of diminished self-worth and frustration. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: diarrhea, anxiety, and cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects movement, muscle tone, or posture). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 3/5/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 4/28/25 at 10:05 AM, Resident #100 reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P had yelled at him because he had an accident. Resident #100 reported he had had a bowel movement accident and CNA P came in his room and started yelling because he had had the accident. Resident #100 reported Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for immediate reporting to the State Agency for 1 (Residents #100) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse reporting, resulting in the potential for further instances of abuse going undetected, unreported, or without thorough investigation. Findings include: Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 3/5/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 4/28/25 at 10:05 AM, Resident #100 stated, I had one of the aides that verbally abused me. Resident #100 reported he had had a bowel movement accident. Resident #100 reported the aide (CNA Certified Nurse Aide P) had come in his room and started yelling at him because he had had an accident. Resident #100 reported that he had complained to the facility. Resident #100 reported that a nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN Q) had witnessed the incident and encouraged him to report it. Resident #100…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices as evidenced by failure to 1. Ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #14); and 2. Ensure proper PPE (personal protective equipment) for enhanced barrier precautions was used during personal cares for 1 (Resident #14) of 15 total sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices resulting in the potential for the introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and/or disease transmission. Findings include: Resident #14 Review of a Face sheet revealed Resident #14 was male and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: Traumatic brain injury (TBI; a brain injury that occurs when a sudden external physical assault happens to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty or the inability to swallow), and neurogenic bladder (a lack of coordination between the brain and the bladder resulting in the inability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00146599 & MI00146889. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for 2 (Resident #101 and #102) of 3 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the inability to call for staff assistance and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included age related physical debility. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 10/23/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, which indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #101's current Care Plan revealed, .(Resident #101) does not want to experience a fall with major injury .Interventions .Call light within reach .Start date: 1/21/23 . Review of Resident #101's Nursing Note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00146599. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided per resident preference and plan of care for 1 (Resident #101) of 3 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, resulting in inadequate personal hygiene, missed showers, and dissatisfaction with care and hygiene concerns. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included age related physical debility. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 10/23/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, which indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #101's current Care Plan revealed, (Resident #101) requires assistance with ADL's .Interventions .Showers as scheduled .Start date: 2/7/24 . Review of Resident #101's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications for 3 (Resident #84, 44 and 74) of 5 residents reviewed for self administration of medication, resulting in unsupervised administration of medications and the potential for mismanagement of medication and potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident #84 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #84 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #84's Orders revealed Hydrocodone-acetaminophen (norco) (opioid pain medication) 5-325 mg per tablet. Dose: 1 tablet. Freq (frequency): 3 times daily. Route PO (by mouth) . During an observation and interview on 8/13/24 at 12:40 PM, Resident #84 approached Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H and requested her pain medication. LPN H took Resident #84's medication from the medication cart and placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, treat, and implement interventions for a residents with pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #27) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in the worsening condition of a pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #27 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pressure injury of left buttock, stage 3. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #27, with a reference date of 6/4/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #27's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #27) has a stage 3 pressure injury . Goal: (Resident #27) will demonstrate improvement in skin integrity AEB (as exhibited by) no signs and symptoms of infection. Interventions: . monitor for s/sx (signs and symptoms) of infection: warmth, redness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with a history of trauma received trauma informed care for 1 (Resident #99) from a total sample of 28 residents, resulting in the potential for exposure to trauma triggers and re-traumatization. Findings include: .According to the National Institute on Mental Health, 2019, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) is a disorder that some people develop after experiencing a shocking, scary, or dangerous event. It is natural to feel afraid during and after a traumatic situation. This fear triggers many split-second changes in the body to respond to danger and help a person avoid danger in the future. The fight or flight response is typical reaction meant to protect a person from harm. Nearly everyone will experience a range of reactions after trauma, yet most people will recover from those symptoms naturally. Those who continue to experience problems may be diagnosed with PTSD. People who have PTSD may feel stressed or frightened even…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COREWELL HEALTH — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI