Chapel View Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 266 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.47 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement infection control strategies for respiratory protection to mitigate the risk and spread of Influenza A. As a result, the facility developed an outbreak where 13 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9, R13, R8, R10, R11 and R12) tested positive for Influenza A. Five residents (R1, R2, R5, R10 and R15) were sent to ED and admitted to hospital, These practices resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) due to the likelihood of spread to the remaining 80 residents in the facility. The IJ began on 3/31/25, when the facility failed to implement ongoing monitoring, screening of residents with respiratory symptoms and implement transmission-based precautions and was identified on 4/18/25. The Administrator, director of Nursing (DON), and regional nurse consultant (RNC), were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 11:50 a.m. on 4/23/25. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/19/25 and the deficient practice corrected on 4/19/25, prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow practitioner orders for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for respiratory care when R3 was sent to an off-site appointment without oxygen, resulting in a change in her condition requiring hospitalization.The noncompliance that began on 1/27/26 was corrected prior to the start of survey when the facility implemented a corrective action plan on 1/27/26. This is issued in past noncompliance. Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had diagnoses of morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a condition where breathing is shallow or slow), hypertensive kidney disease, lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by fluid that is usually drained by the body's lymphatic system), atrial fibrillation, (an irregular heart rhythm), venous insufficiency and hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood).R3's care plan, dated 1/23/26, directed administer oxygen (O2) per orders.A nurse practitioner (NP) visit note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 resident (R4) whose wheelchair was soiled. In addition, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment cleanliness of intravenous (IV) poles for 2 of 4 residents (R40 and R98) reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include:Wheelchair:R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance with cares. The MDS identified R4 had diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body), diabetes, spondylosis (age-related degeneration of the spine), and osteoarthritis. The MDS indicated R4 used a wheelchair for locomotion. R4's current care plan revised 9/10/25, identified R4 required assistance with wheelchair mobility for partial distance and off the unit due to impaired mobility and left sided hemiplegia, uses left side foot rest only with left arm rest. During observation on 12/01/2025, at 11:51am. R4 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and appropriately monitor 2 of 3 residents (R5, R13) with acute illnesses including but not limited to influenza that resulted in hospitalization reviewed for change of condition. Findings include: See F880 for additional information about facility's infection control and prevention practices regarding influenza. R5 R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperkalemia (elevated blood level of potassium), and acute and chronic respiratory failure. R5 used supplemental oxygen therapy and was cognitively intact. R5's care plan problems dated 7/7/23, identified R5 was at risk for decline in medical condition with intervention to monitor for changes in condition and notify provider and resident representative as indicated. R5's care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a system to ensure physician orders were accurately transcribed to prevent and/or mitigate risk of medication errors for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for medication errors. The facility's failures resulted in R17 received ibuprofen 66 times not in accordance with physician orders. Findings include: R17's face sheet dated 4/24/25, indicate the following diagnoses of status post stroke, and aneurysm of left internal carotid artery. R17's interagency transfer form dated 4/2/25, included an order for ibuprofen (IBU- (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to treat mild to moderate pain. Side effects include headache, dizziness, nausea, bleeding, and bruising)) 400 mg every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. R17's provider visit summaries dated 4/4/25 and 4/14/25, included and identified an order for (IBU) 400 mg every 6 hours PRN for fever. R17's electronic health record (EHR) identified the aforementioned physician order for as needed IBU however was not accurately transcribed into the EHR system. The order that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents (R15) reviewed for medication errors. Findings include: R15's face sheet dated 4/24/25, indicated diagnoses of fractured left femur, status post hemiarthroplasty (hip replacement) left hip, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and acute bronchitis due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). R15's hospital discharge summary indicated R15 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged to the facility on 4/17/25. The discharge orders that had been faxed to the facility on 4/17/25, identified two separate Dilaudid (opioid narcotic pain killer) orders: -Order signed by physician on 4/14/25, identified an order for Dilaudid 2mg tablets to take 1 to 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed for pain; take 1 tablet for pain rate 4-7 out of 10. Take 2 tablets for pain rate 8-10 out of 10 -Order signed by physician on 4/17/25, identified an order for Dilaudid 2 mg tablets to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for laboratory studies had been obtained in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents (R5, R13, R15) who had physician ordered labs. Findings include: R5 R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, and acute and chronic respiratory failure. R5's care plan dated 7/7/23, identified she was at risk for decline in medical condition. Interventions included administering medications and treatments per physician orders and monitoring for changes in condition and notifying provider as indicated. R5's progress note by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A dated 4/8/25 at 12:21 p.m., indicated R5 had a change in condition and the provider was notified. The provider ordered STAT (immediately, without delay) laboratory (lab) studies of CBC (complete blood count, a blood draw study), BMP (basic metabolic panel, a blood draw study), COVID-19, RSV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of an abnormal laboratory result for 1 of 3 residents (R13) who had laboratory orders. Findings include: R13's nurse practitioner (NP) note dated 4/9/25, indicated R13 was seen for an acute visit by NP-A regarding a new problem. Assessment and plan included will check for influenza/COVID-19 due to confirmed cases at the facility. R13's laboratory (lab) result fax transmission form dated 4/12/25, included the result for an influenza A test ordered by NP-A. The swab for the test was collected on 4/10/25 at 11:00 a.m. and the test resulted on 4/11/25 at 9:58 p.m. The influenza A value was listed as detected (A) with a legend identifying A to mean abnormal. R13's late entry progress note dated 4/10/25, identified it was entered on 4/15/25 by nurse manager registered nurse (RN)-A. The note indicated a swab was collected from R13 on 4/10/25 to test for influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 and lab results came out negative.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for documentation. Findings include: R5's facesheet indicated her current admission to the facility began on 7/6/23 with most recent return to the facility date of 4/18/25. R5's progress note dated 4/9/25, indicated R5 was confused, slow to respond, very weak, showed signs of distress, and was sent to the hospital. R5's progress note dated 4/18/25, indicated R5 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital at 1:26 p.m. via emergency medical services. R5's electronic health record (EHR) reviewed on 4/22/25, did not include NP-A's visit note dated 4/9/25 nor a hospital discharge summary or physician history and physical (H&P) from R5's hospitalization 4/9/25 to 4/18/25. During an interview on 4/22/25 at 12:32 p.m., health unit coordinator (HUC)-A stated provider visit notes typically came in the same day as the visit or the next day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to appropriately complete a thorough self administration assessment on 3 of 4 (R2, R3 and R4) sampled residents (who preferred not to administer their own medication) by ensuring residents who were left while the administration was occurring unattended, were found competent to leave their masks and/on or turn off the nebulizer appropriately when finished. Findings include: R2's quarterly minimum date set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and asthma. R2's SAM dated 3/21/25 indicated R2 did not want to self-administer medications. No further assessment occurred to ensure R2 could successfully complete treatment if left unattended. On 4/1/2025 at 1:15 p.m., R2 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with a nebulizer mask applied on her face with the nebulizer machine turned on. No staff members are observed in the room or in the hallway outside the room. On 4/2/2025 11:13 a.m., R2 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and discuss risks and benefits prior to installation of grab bars for 1 of 1 residents (R194) observed to have grab bars affixed to their bed. Findings include: R194's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate staff assistance with bed mobility. R194's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for cognitive loss and dementia dated 11/19/24, indicated he had observable confusion, disorientation, and forgetfulness. The CAA indicated R194 was alert and able to make his needs known. R194's CAA for falls dated 11/19/24, indicated he was a fall risk and identified risk factors including hearing impairment, cognitive impairment, pain, impaired mobility and balance, history of two falls prior to admission, and weakness post-hospitalization. A device-equipment assessment dated [DATE], indicated a left and right upper assist rail/grab bar were used. The assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn as required during high contact care for 2 of 3 residents (R193, R9) who required EBP and were reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R193's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he had mild cognitive impairment and required partial-to-moderate staff assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. The MDS further indicated R193 had a bladder catheter. R193's Diagnoses Report printed 11/22/24, listed his diagnoses of bladder cancer that spread to his bone tissue, muscle weakness, malnutrition, diabetes, urinary tract infection (UTI), and artificial openings of urinary tract status-bilateral nephrostomy (nephrostomy tubes, or surgically placed catheter tubes that drain urine directly from the kidneys outside of the body into collection bags). R193's current physician orders printed 11/22/24 were reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASSIA — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN