Redeemer Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 110.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to follow infection control standards of practice for cleaning of hard surfaces in the resident room for 1 of 1 residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure personal laundry was transported and delivered in a manner that prevented risk of contamination for 1 of 3 hallways (3rd floor) observed for linen transportation. In addition, the facility had failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were assessed for and implemented timely for 1 of 1 residents (R39) reviewed with symptoms of a possible gastrointestinal illness. Findings include: Wheelchair arm rests: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities (2003) the cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces is fundamental in reducing their potential contribution to the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R44 with severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident and resident guardian's participation in the development of interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for participation in care planning. Findings include: According to the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated October 2023, the RAI is used to, assist staff with evaluating goal achievement and revising care plans accordingly by enabling the nurse home to track changes in the resident's status. The RAI, establishes a course of action with input from the resident (resident's family and/or guardian or other legally authorized representative(, resident's physician and interdisciplinary team that moves a resident toward resident-specific goals utilizing individual resident strengths and interdisciplinary expertise. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) refers to the specific endpoint for the observation period in the MDS assessment process and is federally mandated to be completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed for a change of condition. Findings include: R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R32 had intact cognition. R32's provider note dated 4/18/25, indicated R32 had a history of a deep vein thrombosis (blood clot, DVT) and a pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lungs, PE) and remained on Apixaban (blood thinner) twice daily. R32 also had a history of a stroke requiring hospitalization from 12/26/24 to 1/2/25, diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, and cancer. R32's progress note dated 5/29/25 at 7:12 p.m., indicated R32 had an unresponsive episode where the nursing assistant (NA) observed R32 leaning to his left side so licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B was notified. The progress note indicated that LPN-B completed an assessment of R32. The note indicated R32's eyes remained open during the period, and a few seconds into the assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with received medications to promote continuity of care and ensure accurate care planning for 2 of 2 residents (R122 and R311) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: R122 admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R122 was admitted to the care facility on 5/1/25. Section N of the MDS, used to indicated what, if any, high risk medications a resident received in the past seven days, indicated R122 has received insulin injections one time in the past seven days. R122's Physician Order Report, dated 5/1/25 - 6/4/25, lacked evidence R122 was on an insulin injection. The report did indicate R122 received an Ozempic injection once a week on Sundays for a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type II. However, according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual for Long-Term Care, Ozempic should not be classified as an insulin injection or a high-risk hypoglycemic medication. Ozempic's classification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Pre-admission Screening (PAS) and, if needed, a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed to screen for mental health needs for 2 of 3 residents (R6, R32) reviewed for PAS. Findings include: R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had intact cognition. R6's medical diagnoses list dated 5/20/25, indicated R6 was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder with auditory hallucinations. R6's PAS notice dated 5/19/25, indicated a copy of the PAS was included with this notice but the PAS was not final until the lead agency sent a final determination to the nursing home. R6's entire medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence a final determination had been received. R32's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R32 had intact cognition. R32's medical diagnoses list dated 4/25/25, indicated R32 was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder with an acute exacerbation. R32's PAS notice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine oral hygiene was completed to reduce the risk of complication for 1 of 4 residents (R39) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R39 had moderately impaired cognition and did not have rejection of care behaviors during the look-back period (LBP). The MDS indicated that R39 required substantial assistance to complete oral hygiene. R39's care plan dated 5/19/25, indicated R39 had full upper dentures, natural teeth on the bottom, with the front teeth missing. The care plan indicated staff were to provide extensive assistance with oral care. R39's Point of Care History dated 5/3/25 to 6/2/25 was reviewed and did not include documentation of oral care. During an interview on 6/2/25 at 3:12 p.m., R39 stated staff were supposed to help her brush her teeth twice a day but had not been doing so. R39…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a developed skin condition was appropriately and consistently treated to promote healing for 1 of 2 residents (R49) reviewed who had developed dry skin. Findings include: R49's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R49 had intact cognition and demonstrated no delusional thinking. Further, the MDS recorded R49 received dialysis and had no current ulcers, wounds or other skin problems (i.e., burns, lesions). R49's care plan, revised 5/19/25, identified R49 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) due to multiple medical conditions including hemiparesis. The care plan outlined R49 was at risk of altered skin integrity due to heart failure and R49 had a history of pressure ulcers. The care plan listed multiple interventions to help R49's skin remain intact including, Moisturize dry skin. On 6/2/25 at 7:09 p.m., R49 was observed lying in bed while in his room. R49 was interviewed and expressed he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed for 3 of 4 residents ( R4, R5, R6). In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was properly utilized for 1 of 4 resident (R4) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R4 R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R4 was cognitively intact, had an indwelling catheter, and was dependent upon staff assistance for transfers. R4's Face Sheet printed 3/25/25, indicated diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacrum and left thigh, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. R4's care plan dated 2//21/25, indicated an indwelling catheter, and on 3/13/25, indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (measures intended to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms ) related to a pressure ulcer. On 3/25/25 at 10:52 a.m., during an observation, there were two signs on R4's door that indicated the following: Enhanced Barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) committee was effective in maintaining appropriate action plans to correct a quality deficiency identified during a previous survey related to self administration of medications (SAM) which resulted in a deficiency identified during this survey. Findings include: Review of the CASPER dated 3/28/24, indicated the facility was cited for F755 related to a resident not monitored for medication administration on the survey which exited on 3/2/23. See F554, Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 3 of 3 (R66. R6, and R73) residents observed with medications at bedside. Quarter One 2023, QAPI minutes dated 1/1/23, through 3/31/23, were reviewed and indicated under the heading, Survey Results and Audits F755 unattended medication, education was completed, a whole house sweep was completed to check…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during medication administration for 2 of 4 residents ( R41, R48). The facility also failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was implemented during suprapubic (S/P) catheter cares for 1 of 4 residents (R2), and during the provision of personal cares for 1 of 4 residents (R88) reviewed for infection control. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for 1 of 1 resident (R266) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Findings Include: Medication Administration R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R41 was cognitively intact. R41's face sheet diagnosis included other sites of candidiasis, urinary tract infection. R48's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R48 was cognitively intact, and medications included antipsychotics and anticoagulants. R48's care plan updated 4/8/2024, indicated R48 required enhanced barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASSIA — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN