Harmony Gardens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 59.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.54 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were followed during transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents when staff failed to use a transfer belt. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who fell during a staff assisted transfer and sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey therefore, was issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet indicated R 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet identified diagnosis that included vascular dementia, cerebral infarction with left sided weakness, anemia and heart failure. R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and indicated he required partial to moderate assistance for transfers. R1's care plan dated 9/3/24, indicated impaired self ability with transfers and ambulation. The care plan directed staff to provide contact guard assistance with transfers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerators were labeled, dated, and not expired. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. Findings include:On 3/25/26 at 10:40 a.m., director of food and nutrition (DFN) provided a tour of the facility kitchen. In the walk-in refrigerator there was a container of beets labeled with an opened date of 2/23. Multiple white patches of a substance were observed on the top surface of the beets. DFN confirmed and stated the substance was mold. DNF further stated the beets had been opened longer than seven days and should have been discarded. In addition, a container of potato salad was observed in the same refrigerator, labeled with an opened date of 3/10. DNF confirmed and stated the potato salad was expired and should have been discarded. In a standalone refrigerator, an individual sized prepared salad, a half-full container of fresh strawberries and a quarter-full container of fresh blueberries were observed with no label or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pillows were not used in a manner to restrain residents while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for restraints.Findings include:R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R44 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility, and was dependent for transfers. R44's MDS further indicated R44 did not experience any falls since admission, was receiving hospice care and did not use any restraints. R44's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, chronic lung disease). R44's care plan dated 3/10/26, indicated R44 was at risk for falls and used body pillows to define the edge of the bed. R44's nursing care sheet printed 3/9/26, indicated R44 required two-person assistance using a mechanical lift for transfers and one person assist every 2-3 hours for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a subset (i.e., discharge) Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) database in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI manual), dated 10/2025, identified all applicable MDS along with their completion and transmission dates were required. This included, Discharge Assessment - return not anticipated, listed with a transmission date of, MDS Completion Date + 14 calendar days. R30's Census List, printed 3/26/26, identified R30's most recent admission to the facility as 11/4/25. R30 remained in the facility in the same room until 12/5/25. The census identified R30's status on 12/5/25 as Discharge-Return Not Anticipated. R30's progress note dated 12/5/25 at 1:22 p.m., indicated R30 discharged from community at1:23 p.m.Review of R30's MDS 3.0 resident assessments list printed on 3/25/26, indicated an admission and 5-day assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess residents' ability to independently empty and report urine output for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed who had a urinary catheter. Findings include: R50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, urine retention, and overactive bladder. It further indicated R50 had an indwelling catheter and was independent with toileting. R50's physician's order dated 2/19/21, indicated catheter care: catheter output three times a day. R50's care plan reviewed/revised 2/26/26, indicated R50 had a chronic supra pubic catheter (long term use urinary catheter via abdominal incision) changed monthly by urologist due to inability to manage with straight catheter, urinary retention enlarged, prostrate and history of urinary tract infections (UTI). Interventions included catheter cares, monitor for UTI, monitor and report any concerns, monitor urine output every shift and notify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess physical restraints (manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to a resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) reviewed who use bedrails. Findings include: Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment User Manual Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, viewed 8/26/24 indicated a physical restraint or method physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the residents body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Residents who are cognitively impaired are at a higher risk of entrapment and injury or death caused by physical restraints. It is vital that physical restraints used on this population be carefully considered and monitored. Any manual method or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds, assess the residents for risk of entrapment, review risks and benefits for bed rail use, ensure bed dimensions were appropriate for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) review for bed rails. Findings include: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines (Recommendations for Health Care Providers about Bed Rails) 2018 indicated health care providers should base the use of bed rails on individual resident assessments to ensure the individual is an appropriate candidate to reduce the risk of entrapment. Recommendations made for health care providers to evaluate the individual's need, to use the guidance documented Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment to have knowledge that not all bedrails, mattresses, and bed frames are interchangeable; check the manufacture instructions, health care providers are to avoid the routine use of adult…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report allegations of abuse and injury of unknow origin to the State Agency (SA) no later than two hours after the allegation is made for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. R1's family filed a facility grievance that indicated staff was aggressive with R1 and a facility nurse found bruising that were similar to finger marks on R1's upper arm where a cause was not identified. Neither event was reported. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 9 indicting R1 was moderately cognitively impaired. R1 required maximum assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, personal hygiene and rolling in bed. R1 was dependent on staff for bed to chair transferring. R1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's pertinent diagnoses were hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the nondominant side (muscle weakness and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide evidence that a thorough investigation was completed on allegations of an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed. Staff found bruising resembling finger markings on R1's upper arm. R1's family had filed a grievance report regarding aggressive care one day prior to the bruising findings. Findings include: Facility record grievance review dated 1/1/25 - 4/3/25 did not reveal any documented grievance or investigation regarding R1's bruising an injury of unknown origin. R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 9 indicting R1 was moderately cognitively impaired. R1 required maximum assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, personal hygiene and rolling in bed. R1 was dependent on staff for bed to chair transferring. R1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R1's pertinent diagnoses were hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow transmission based precautions (TBP) based on signage located outside resident's doors for R29, R45, R17, R14. This had the potential to affect all residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during 3 of 6 residents (R14, R55, R47) observed for medication administration. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website, transmission based precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to standard precautions (standard precautions is based on the principle that all blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions except sweat, regardless of whether they contain visible blood, non-intact skin, and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents) for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission. The CDC website…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure timely care was provided in a manner to maintain and enhance quality of life for 1 of 2 residents (R64) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R64's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 11/30/24 indicated R64 had mild cognitive impairment and diagnoses of heart failure and sepsis (systemic infection). R64 required extensive assist of one person for bed mobility and transfers. R64's care plan dated 11/29/24, indicated R64 had impaired self-performance with toileting due to weakness and sepsis. R64 was incontinent of bowel and continent of bladder. Interventions included toilet upon rising, after meals and before going to bed as needed. R64 required max assistance from staff for toileting. R64's nursing assistant (NA) care sheet obtained 1/6/25, indicated R64 required toileting via Hoyer lift or bedpan upon rising, after meals and before going to bed as needed. R64's call light report for 1/7/25, indicated R64's call light was placed at 1:52 p.m. and was closed at 1:56 p.m. An observation on 1/7/25 at 2:06…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CASSIA — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN