No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Livingston Manor Care Center

939 East Birch, Chillicothe, MO 64601 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (660) 646-5177 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$168,230 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $168,230 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-21)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2791 N Washington St · (660) 646-2682 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
609 Locust St · (660) 646-0400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
720 Elm St · (660) 339-3014 · Call to confirm hours
Park
300 Mack St · +166607526275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
713 Milwaukee Ave · (660) 646-7233

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.1%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%2.3%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%18.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.8%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.3%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.5%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table68.6%23.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.142.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.072.331.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 8.4–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.71
RN hoursweekends
61.9%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 26.2 residents a day — about 28% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to protect two sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) from resident to resident sexual abuse. Resident #1 was identified to have sexual behaviors towards others. Facility staff found Resident #1 alone and fully naked sitting on an empty bed with Resident #3's hands on Resident #1's genitals, and staff failed to report this to the facility Administrator or Director of Nursing. The following day, Resident #1 lead Resident #2 into a room, removed his/her pants and was seen by facility staff, holding Resident #2's hand on Resident#1's genitals. The facility census was 29. The administrator was notified on 2/22/24 at 10:30 A.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 1/19/24. The IJ was removed on 2/22/24 as confirmed by surveyor on-site. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 2/21/17, showed: -All residents shall be free from any and all abuse. -All staff are to report any and all concerns related to possible resident abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assess one resident (Resident #140) thoroughly and notify the resident's physician when he/she had a change in condition and seizure-like activity. The facility failed to assess thoroughly, notify the physician, and transport the resident using Emergency Medical Services (EMS) after the resident had another seizure-like activity and became unresponsive with agonal (labored and loud with long pauses) respirations. Facility staff further failed to properly assess, notify physician, and attempt to remove the resident's indwelling urinary catheter appropriately that became dislodge and stuck in his/her urethra. The resident was pronounced deceased at 12:06 P.M. on [DATE], approximately 16 minutes after leaving the facility. The facility census was 39. The administrator was notified on [DATE] at 4:23 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor on-site. Review of the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) was free from abuse when Resident #1 was pushed onto the floor by Resident #2 which caused two skin tears on Resident #1's left arm after Resident #1 went into Resident #2's room due to confusion. This affected one of four sampled residents. The facility census was 28.Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated April 2021, showed residents had the right to be free from abuse. This included by was not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, verbal, mental, or physical abuse. The facility would protect residents from abuse by anyone including other residents.Review of the facility policy titled, Resident-to-Resident Altercations, dated 2001, showed facility staff were supposed monitor residents for aggressive/inappropriate behaviors towards other residents. Behaviors that may provoke a reaction by residents to others included wandering into others'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse when C.N.A. A slapped Resident #1 on the hand with his/her open hand and forced the residents' hands down into his/her lap twice while in the dining room for a meal. This effected one of three sampled residents. The facility census was 25. Review of the facilities Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 1/31/24, showed:-Abuse means the willful infliction injury, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse;-New employees will be educated on abuse during initial orientation and existing staff will receive annual education through planned in-services and as needed;-Training topics will include: prohibiting and preventing all forms of abuse, understanding behavioral symptoms of residents that may increase the risk of abuse such as aggressive reactions of resident's, resistance to care, outbursts or yelling, and difficulty in adjusting to new routines or staff;-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy to notify law enforcement of an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse. This affected one of four sampled residents. The facility census was 25.Review of the facilities Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, dated 2001, showed:-If resident abuse was suspected the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law;-The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to law enforcement officials.Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally required assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 2/17/26, showed:-The resident was not cognitively intact; -The resident was dependent on staff for carrying out activities of daily living;-The resident used a wheelchair for mobility;-The resident had diagnoses of lack of coordination, generalized muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure they employed a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility census was 31. The facility did not provide the requested nurse staffing policy.Review of the staffing sheets for January 2025 showed:- No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 01/01, 01/04, 01/05, 01/11,01/12, 01/18 and 01/19;Review of the staffing sheets for February 2025 showed:- No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 02/01, 02/02,02/08,02/09,02/15 and,02/23;Review of the staffing sheets for March 2025 showed:- No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 03/08,03/09,03/22,03/23.During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 11:46 A.M., the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) said:- They should have an RN coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. The facility census was 31.Review of the facility's Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Areas, undated., showed: The dining services manager will be responsible for ensuring the cleaning and sanitation is maintained in the kitchen and dining areas.- All staff will be trained on the frequency of cleaning.- A cleaning schedule will be posted for all cleaning tasks. - Observation of the kitchen on 08/18/25 at 10:46 A.M., showed: - Area under the three compartment sink covered with food debris;-The floor under the prep table covered with dirt and debris;-A metal storage rack above the prep table covered in dirt and dust;-A cake uncovered sat under the dirty and dusty metal storage rack;-The handles of the refrigerator covered with a sticky substance;- A black substance along the drain on the floor in the dish room;-A fan covered with dust and debris blew across a tray with open glasses with ice in them;-The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a surety bond in an amount to cover any loss of theft to residents' money held in the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account which affected all residents who had money held in their RTF account. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's Surety Bond Policy dated March 2021 showed:-This facility holds a surety bond to guarantee the protection of residents' funds managed by the facility on behalf its residents;-All funds entrusted to the facility for a resident are covered by the surety bond. Review of the RTF worksheet, completed on 08/21/2025, showed:-The average monthly balance for the facility's interest-bearing account was $36673.99;-The facility still held funds in the operating account for Resident #45 who was discharged from the facility on 10/20/24; -The approved bond amount for this average monthly balance (Grand Total rounded to the nearest thousand x 1.5 + $850.00 = required bond amount) should be at least $56,775.00. Review of the facility's surety bond rider dated August…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect policy when they failed to complete employee background checks prior to staff working with residents, failed to complete employee disqualification list (EDL) check for one employee, and failed to check the Certified Nurses' Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect). This affected eight of eight sampled staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, The Dietary Manager, Registered Nurse (RN) A, CNA A, Housekeeper A, [NAME] B, CNA B, and RN B). The facility census was 31.Review of facility Background Screening Investigations policy, revised March 2019, showed: -For any individual applying for a position as a certified nursing assistant, the state nurse aide registry is contacted to determine if any findings of abuse, neglect, mistreatment of individuals, and/or theft of property have been entered into the applicant's file; -The director of personnel, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #39 and Resident #41). The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy for discharge summary and plan, revised December 2016, showed:- When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment;- The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident. The discharge summary shall include: current diagnosis medical history (including any history of mental disorders and intellectual disabilities); course of illness, treatment and/or therapy since entering the facility; current laboratory, radiology, consultation, and diagnostic test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provided proper respiratory care when oxygen or nebulizer tubing was not dated for four residents (Residents #4, #7, #18, and #32)., and additionally failed to ensure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) orders were initiated for Resident #9. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's policy for CPAP/Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) support, revised March 2015, showed:- The purpose is to provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure, to improve arterial oxygenation in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease, and to promote resident comfort and safety.Review of the facility's policy for oxygen administration, reviewed 01/01/24, showed:- Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow policy and ensure medications were stored at the proper temperatures and conditions to preserve their integrity when nursing staff did not check the medication room refrigerator temperature daily. The facility census was 31.Review of the facility's policy for storage of medications, revised November 2020 showed:- The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner;- The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner.Observation of the medication refrigerator in the medication room on 08/20/2025 at 09:45 A.M., showed: - No refrigerator temperature log sheet on refrigerator and no log book available in medication room;- No thermometer in the refrigerator;- Freezer was a block of ice and needed defrosted;- Contents of the refrigerator included: four bottles of liquid lorazepam, one bottle of suppositories, one box of Performist inhalation vials, one box of Ozempic injectors, one box of Prolia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that menus were posted in advance and followed. This effected three out of 12 sampled residents (Resident #5, #28 and #34). The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's Menu Planning policy, dated 2020, showed:-Meals are planned in advance;-Planned menus take into consideration the food habits of all residents.Review of the Resident Self Determination and Participation policy, dated 2020, showed:-Residents have the right to choose activities, schedules, health care, and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care;-Residents have the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. 1.Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 07/12/25, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Minimal assistance for transfers, bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared foods designed in a way to meet the needs of individual residents when they did not ensure the puree (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) food had a smooth and appropriate consistency. This affected one resident (Resident #15) identified by the facility as having orders for a pureed diet. The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's Purred Food Preparation Policy, dated 2020, showed:-Pureed foods will be prepared using standardized recipes to ensure quality, flavor and palatability;Pureed foods will be the consistency of applesauce or mashed potatoes.1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 06/18/25, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, bathing, locomotion, toileting and eating;-Coughing and pain while swallowing;-Diagnoses included seizure disorder, diabetes and high blood cholesterol.A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system that assured a full and complete, separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf when monthly personal funds reconciliation showed a negative balance and when the facility failed to reimburse the residents and/or their responsible party after the resident was discharged .This affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #45). The facility census was 31. Review of the facility's Conveyance of Resident Funds policy dated March 2021 showed:-Any funds on deposit with the facility are refunded to the resident, the resident representative, or the resident's estate, upon discharge, eviction or death as applicable;-The resident's personal funds and a final accounting of funds are returned to the resident, the resident's representative or to the resident's estate as, applicable, with in 30 days from the date of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when the facility failed to have a documented water management program. The facility census was 31. Review of the monitoring water supply to minimize outbreaks of Legionella Bacteria Contamination policy, dated 12/12/2019, showed:-It is the policy of the facility to maintain water management controls through the use of risk assessments, water management program and water management program team meetings so as to minimize the possibility of a Legionella outbreak in residents through contamination of the facility water system. During an interview on 08/20/2025 at 11:35 A.M. The Maintenance Supervisor said: - He tests the waters PH monthly;- He does not perform Legionella testing;- He does not document a water management plan with interventions or risk assessments;

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed protect one sampled residents (Resident #1) right to be free from physical abuse when resident (Resident #2) hit Resident #1 in the head. The facility staff did not place Resident #2 on increased monitoring until the resident was moved to the secured unit six days after the event. The facility census was 37. Review of the facility's abuse policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 1/31/24 showed: -It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Instances of abuse of all residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facilty staff failed to maintain standard infection control precautions when staff did not perform hand hygiene with glove changes during wound care for two residents (Resident #1 and #2). Additionally, staff did not wear a personal protective gown when assisting with wound care for Resident #2 when the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility did not have gowns near or outside of the resident rooms. The facility did not obtain a physicians order to implement EBP when Resident #1 and #2 had wounds. This deficient practice affected two of two sampled residents. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 1/1/24 showed: - Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of Practice; - The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene; - Perform hand hygiene prior to putting on gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to use sanitary practice of washing hands and turning off faucet handle with same towel, failed to date food items, failed to check and record temperatures of the refrigerator and freezer units daily, failed to check the dishwasher twice daily prior to washing dishes, failed to temperature check all foods being served to residents, failed to store personal items away from food, and failed to complete daily food temperature log prior to meal service. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of facility policy, proper hand washing and glove use, dated 2020, showed: -All employees will use proper hand washing procedures and glove usage in accordance with State and Federal sanitation guidelines. -Proper procedure for washing hands is as following: a. Turn on water as hot as comfortable. b. Wet hands and apply soap. c. Scrub 15 to 20 seconds or more: getting under nails, between fingers, and all exposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect when staff did not ask each resident before applying clothing protectors to them in North and South dining rooms, stood while assisting four sampled residents with eating (Residents #14, #7, and #29), when staff left a clothing protector on resident before and after meals (Resident #14) and when staff did not provide privacy when was left exposed to hallway while only wearing a brief and T-shirt. (Residents #3). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff cared for residents in a dignified manner when they obtained blood sugars and administered insulin in the dining room which affected Resident #12 and #24. The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, promoting/maintaining resident dignity, updated 1/1/24, showed: -It is the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act promptly and resolve resident grievances voiced during the resident council meetings and did not demonstrate a response and rationale for such response. The facility did not maintain documentation of resident concerns, attempts to resolve concerns or follow up actions. The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 1/1/24, showed: -Be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights; -Exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal from the facility; -To voice grievances to facility, or other agency that hears grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; -Have the facility respond to his or her grievances; Review of the grievance policy, updated 1/1/24, showed: -Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgement of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance; -Grievances may be voiced in following forums: -Verbal complaint during resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews the facility staff failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds after business hours and on the weekend. The facility census was 29. The facility did not provide policy on funds access. Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, revised December 2016 showed: -Manage his or her personal funds, or have the facility manage his or her funds; During a group interview four of four residents said they did not have access to funds on weekends or after hours. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 10:06 A.M., Business Office Manager (BOM) said: -Residents have access to money as long as someone is in the office; -There is no access to money on weekends. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 3:03 P.M., Administrator said: -Residents do not currently have access to funds on weekends or after business hours; -Residents should have access to money after business hours. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 3:03 P.M., Corporate Administrator said: -Residents did not have access to their personal funds after hours; -When residents want funds they make an effort to notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system that assured a full and complete and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf when monthly personal funds reconciliation showed a negative balance and when the facility failed to reimburse residents' and/or their responsible parties after the residents were discharged which affected four of 12 residents (Resident #135, #136, #132, and #131). The facilities census was 29. 1. Review of facility monthly petty reconciliation logs showed: -[DATE] had negative petty cash ending balance of -302.23; -[DATE] had a negative petty cash ending balance of -61.88. Review of Interim Aged Analysis Summary, dated [DATE], showed: -Resident #135 (discharged [DATE]), had a negative balance of -1,190.66 in facility's operating account; -Resident #136 (discharged [DATE]), had a negative balance of -10.00 in facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they informed residents of their rights periodically during residents' stay both orally and in writing. The facility census 29. Review of resident right's policy, revised December 2016, showed: -Be informed of his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a resident or citizen of the United States; - The policy listed out all of the residents' rights; - The policy did not specifically indicate when these rights should be communicated with the residents. During a group interview on 5/28/24 at 10:54 A.M. four of four residents had not received education about their resident rights. Review of resident council meeting minutes showed: -3/6/24, no documentation that resident rights were reviewed; -4/9/24, no documentation that resident rights were reviewed; -5/2/24, no documentation that resident rights were reviewed. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 10:05 P.M., Activity Director said: -He/She facilitated resident council meetings; -He/She had not gone over resident rights during resident council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to clarify the status of the advanced directives (a legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions because of a serious illness or injury) for one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for advance directives, revised December 2016, showed, in part: - Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; - Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he/she chooses to do so; - If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his/her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to the resident's legal representative; - If the resident becomes able to receive and understand this information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN) (the form Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) - 10055 to each resident. The SNF ABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid by Medicare and assume financial responsibilities. The facility used the incorrect form for three of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #27, #28 and #83). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for advance beneficiary notices, reviewed [DATE], showed, in part: - It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage; - The Business Office Manager (BOM) is the contact person for the information regarding Medicare eligibility, coverage, and applying for benefits. A notice alerting residents/representatives of this contact person shall be posted conspicuously in the facility; - The current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures through out the facility, clean floors, replace chipped and broken tiles, replace hand sanitizer dispensers in resident rooms, replace broken or missing blinds, sand and paint drywall patches, repair scraped and missing paint from walls, and did not clean dust and cobwebs in facility. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, Safe and Homelike Environment, reviewed 1/1/24, showed: -In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. -Comfortable and safe temperature levels means that the ambient temperature should be relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure residents have the right to file grievances in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, his or her name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number; a reasonable expected time frame for completing the review of the grievances, the right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 29 Review of facility policy, Resident and Family Grievances, reviewed 1/1/24, showed: -Grievances may be voiced in following forums: -Verbal complaint to a staff member or grievance official; -Written complaint to a staff member or grievance official; -Written complaint to an outside party; -Information on how to file a grievance or complaint will be available to the resident. Information may include but is not limited to: a. Contact information of the grievance official with who a grievance can be filed, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect policy when they failed to complete employee background checks prior to staff working with residents, failed to complete employee disqualification list (EDL) checks, and failed to check the Certified Nurses' Assistant (CNA) Registry for all staff to ensure they did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect). This affected eight of ten sampled staff (Licensed Pratical Nurse (LPN) C, Housekeeping Aide (HA) B, Nurse Aide (NA) A, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) F, HA A, Registered Nurse (RN) A, Dietary Aide C, and CNA B). The facility census was 29. Review of facility Policy, Abuse and Neglect, reviewed 1/31/24, showed: -It was the policty of the facility top provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. -Potential employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate comprehensive assessments were completed accurately on the minimum data set (MDS) for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #14 ) when no preferences for customary routine and activities was obtained through resident, family, or staff interviews. The facility census was 29. Facility did not provide a policy on comprehensive assessments. Review of facility policy, activities, updated 4/1/24, showed: -Each resident's interest and needs will be assessed on a routine basis. The assessment shall include, but is not limited to: a. Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Process: MDS/Care Area Assessment (CAA)/Care Plan; b. Activity assessment to include resident's interest, preferences, and needed adaptations; c. Social history. Review of facility policy, care plans comprehensive person-centered, updated 1/1/24, showed: -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a Level 1 (indicated for any individual who may have an intellectual disability (ID), developmental disability (DD), or mental illness (MI) PASARR (Pre-admission Screening for Mental Illness/Mental Retardation or related condition) prior to admission to the facility. This affected two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #14 and #26). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for resident assessment -coordination with PASARR program, dated 2023, showed, in part: - This facility coordinates assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs; - All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening; - PASARR Level 1- initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive person - centered plan of care which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for four of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #25, #29 and #81). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for comprehensive person - centered care plans, revised December 2016, showed, in part: - A comprehensive, person - centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person - centered care plan for each resident; - The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards when staff failed to obtain a order to check blood sugars for two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #12 and #24), failed to ensure the low air loss mattress (medical mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcers (PU, an area of localized damage to skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear, friction and/or a combination of these) settings were correct for Resident #16. and additionally failed to obtain a physician's order for a side rail ( assistive device used to assist resident to reposition in bed) for Resident #29. The staff failed to ensure documentation was completed for medications and treatments for Resident #24. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for medication and treatment orders, revised July 2016, showed, in part: - Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide appropriate perineal care which affected one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #16) failed to provide oral care to two of the 12 sampled residents (Resident #12 and #16), failed to wash the face and hands of one of the 12 sampled residents (Resident #12), and failed to ensure staff provided shaving care to one of the 12 sampled residents (Resident #24). This affected three of the 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, ADL's, reviewed 1/1/24, showed: -Facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. -Care and services will be provided for the following activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful activities on a daily basis to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for five of 12 sampled residents (Residents #3, #14, #22, #24, and #25). The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, activities, updated 4/1/24, showed: -It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. -Activities will be designed with the intent to: a. Enhance the resident's sense of well-being, belonging, and usefulness. b. Create opportunities for each resident to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents or injuries when staff failed to lock residents' wheelchairs during transfers which affected three of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #3, #16 and #24). The facility census was 29. Review of invacare hydraulic 9805 portable patient lift and sling manual, revised 5/23/06, showed: -Wheelchair wheels locks must be in a locked position when lifting the person. Review of the facility's policy for using a mechanical lifting machine, revises July 2017, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device; - The policy did not address if the wheelchairs should be locked during the transfer. 1. Review of Resident #16's care plan, revised 9/28/23 showed: - The resident was dependent on staff for all ADLs; - The resident is totally dependent on the assistance of two staff for transfers with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure staff provide proper respiratory care when staff failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator had humidified sterile water, which affected one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16), failed to date the oxygen tubing for Resident #12 and Resident #81. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for oxygen administration, reviewed 1/1/24 showed: - Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person - centered acre plans, and the resident's goals and preferences; - Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician; - Change oxygen tubing and cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated; - Change humidifier bottle when empty, every 72 hours or per facility policy. Use only sterile water for humidification; - Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. 1. Review of Resident #16's care plan, revised 11/20/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation when they failed to complete a side rail assessment (Resident #29), failed assess for an alternative to side rails (Resident #14 and #29), failed to obtain a physician's order (Resident #29) failed to measure entrapment zones for installed side rails (Resident #29) for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident #14, and #29). The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, bed safety, dated 1/1/24, showed: -To prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment the facility shall promote the following approaches: a. Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks; b. Review that gaps within the bed system are within the dimensions established; c. Ensure that when the bed system components are worn and need to be replaced,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure they employed a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for nursing services - Registered Nurse (RN), reviewed 1/1/24 showed, in part: - It is the intent of the facility to comply with Registered Nurse staffing requirements; - The facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. Review of the staffing sheets for October 2023 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 10/27, 10/28. and 10/29. Review of the staffing sheets for March 2024 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 3/10 and 3/11. Review of the staffing sheets for April 2024 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 4/27 and 4/28. Review of the staffing sheets for May 2024 showed: - No RN scheduled for eight consecutive hours 5/4, 5/5, 5/11, 5/12, 5/18, 5/19, and 5/26. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 3:03 P.M., the Administrator and the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made eight medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 32%. This affected four of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #12, #16, #21, and #24). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for administering medications, revised April 2019, showed, in part: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the facility's policy for nasal spray administration, updated 4/15/24, showed, in part: - Nasal spray medications are administered by qualified staff as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice; - Verify orders and labeling prior to administration; - Compare the label with the order to verify correct medication, dose, route, and time of administration; - Agitate the contents in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; - Occlude opposite nostril with your finger,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and effective medication administration system that was free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime insulin pens prior to administering insulin which affected two of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #12 and Resident #24). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for insulin pen, updated 1/1/24, showed, in part: - It is the policy of the facility to use insulin pens in order to improve the accuracy of insulin dosing, provide increased resident comfort, and serve as a teaching aid to prepare residents for self-administration of insulin therapy upon discharge; - Insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir; - Remove the pen cap from the insulin pen; - Wipe the rubber seal with an alcohol pad; - Screw the pen needle onto the insulin pen; - Dial two units by turning the dose selector clockwise; - With the needle pointing up, push the plunger, and watch to see that at least one drop of insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications had a pharmacy label on them to indicate who they belonged to for one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #11), failed to ensure staff did not leave medication at bedside which affected Resident #16 and #24. Additionally, the staff failed to ensure the drawers of the medication cart were clean without any debris. The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for storage of medications, revised November 2020 showed, in part: - The facility stores al drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner; - The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; - Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. 1. Observation and interview on 5/28/24 at 3:38 P.M., showed the following in the South medication cart: - Resident #11 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of the facility job description for DM, dated 2020, showed: - Minimum requirements include one of the following: -Certification as a dietary manager. -Certification as a food service manager. -Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body. -Has an associate's or higher degree in food service management or in hospitality, if the course of study includes food service or restaurant management, for an accredited institution of higher learning. -Must also meet state requirements for food service managers or dietary managers. -Two years experience in food service management. Prior experience in healthcare foodservice preferred. Record review showed DM had enrolled in a course on 8/7/2023, and was not scheduled to complete the course until 11/14/24 November 14, 2024. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the failed to ensure all employees completed a Mantoux test screening for tuberculosis (TB) screening prior to hire. Review of six of 10 sampled employees (Nurse Aide (NA) A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E, CNA F, NA B, Registered Nurse (RN) A, and CNA B) showed the facility was not in compliance. The facility also failed to provide alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) on the memory care unit when hand sanitizer dispensers were left empty. The facility census was 29. 1. Review of facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control Manual Employee Health, dated 2019, showed: -All healthcare workers be tested for tuberculosis upon hire and yearly thereafter; -Initial testing will be two-step procedure with the first dose given before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible for residents in their rooms when call lights were out of reach for two of twelve sampled resident(Resident #24 and #2), draped over the top of the over the bed light fixtures for two of twelve sampled residents (Resident #29 and #6) and when call lights had no strings attached to the wall units for two (Resident #14 and #21) of twelve sampled residents. The facility census was 29. Review of facility policy, call lights accessibility and timely response, updated [DATE], showed: -Purpose of the facility policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, adn bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. -Each resident will be evaluated ofr unique needs and preference to determine any special accommodations that may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #30). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for discharge summary and plan, revised December 2016, showed, in part: - When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment; - The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident. The discharge summary shall include: current diagnosis medical history (including any history of mental disorders and intellectual disabilities); course of illness, treatment and/or therapy since entering the facility; current laboratory, radiology, consultation, and diagnostic test results; physical and mental functional status; Ability to perform activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified activity professional to oversee the activity program for the facility. The facility employees a full time activity director but he/she has not completed an approved activity professional training program. The facility census was 29. The facility did not provide a policy regarding activity professional training and requirements. Review of resident right's policy, dated 1/1/24, showed: -Resident's right to a dignified existence; -Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity; -Self-determination; -Equal access to quality care. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 6:21 A.M., Activity Director said: -He/She had been the Activity Director since 2017; -He/She had one day of training before becoming activity director; -He/She had attended some training's with administrator, director of nursing, and social services provided by the coalition but no activity specific training certifications; -He/She had no specific dementia activity training. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 3:03 P.M., Corporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received treatment as ordered for one resident (Resident #24) when staff did not float (prevent the resident's heels from resting on the mattress) heels in bed by using pressure off-loading boots, when they did not complete weekly skin assessments, and when they did not visualize the resident's wound dressing on two dates to ensure the dressing was in place. The facility census was 29. The facility did not provide a policy on pressure ulcers. Review of facility policy, Medication and Treatment orders, updated 1/1/24, showed: -Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing; -Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. 1. Review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -He/She had severe cognitive impairment; -He/She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided catheter care (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care in a manner to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system) or the possibility of a UTI when staff failed to clean the catheter tubing, the drainage spout and placed the graduate (a clear plastic container with markings used to collect and measure fluids) directly on the floor which affected one of 12 sampled residents, (Resident #16). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's policy for urinary catheter care, revised September 2014, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter - associated urinary tract infections; - Ensure that the catheter remains secures with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. The catheter tubing should be strapped to the resident's inner thigh; - Use one area of the wash cloth for each downward, cleansing stroke; - Change the position of the wash cloth with each downward stroke; - Next,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to report allegations of resident to resident sexual abuse to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) in the required time frame for three residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 2/21/17, included: - Any and all types of allegations will be investigated. - The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) will be responsible for conducting, investigating and reporting the results to the proper authorities. The Administrator or DON will ensure allegations are investigated by conducting staff and resident interviews, conducting and completing assessments, making observations, and reporting allegations to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. 1. Review of Resident #1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 11/8/23, showed staff assessed the resident as: - Moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy and thoroughly investigate allegations of resident to resident sexual abuse for three residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). The facility census was 29. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy, dated 2/21/17, included: -The facility staff will help identify risk factors for abuse in the facility, for residents with unmanaged problematic behaviors, and staff training that is lacking in knowledge of management in behaviors. -The facility management team will institute measures to address the needs of residents to minimize the possibility of resident abuse. -Any and all types of allegations will be investigated. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) will be responsible for conducting, investigating and reporting the results to the proper authorities. The Administrator or DON will ensure allegations are investigated by conducting staff and resident interviews, conducting, and completing assessments, making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39. The facility did not provide a policy addressing kitchen sanitation or storage of toxic materials. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the Low Temp Sanitizer Solution, dated 3/16/16, showed: - Directions for use: o Use a chlorine test kit and increase dosage as necessary to obtain the desired level of available chlorine; o Solutions containing an initial concentration of 100 parts per million (ppm) available chlorine must be tested and adjusted to insure that the available chlorine does not drop below 50 ppm. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the sanitizer test strips, dated 8/5/22, showed: - Dip the strip into the sanitizing solution for 10 seconds; - Instantly compare the resulting color with color chart on label; - Chart on label showed: o 100 ppm - olive green, 200 ppm - aqua green,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a surety bond in an amount to cover any loss of theft to residents' money held in the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) account which affected all residents who had money held in their RTF account. The facility census was 39. Review of facility policy Resident Funds/Trust - Surety Bond, not dated, showed: -It is the policy of facility to ensure that the facility maintains a surety bond for the safety of resident trust. -A surety bond is to be 1.5% of the total of the current balance. -If the required surety bond total is larger than the current bond it must be increased. -The facility insurance agent will be contacted to increase the surety bond. Review of the facility's surety bond letter, approved on 08/28/20, showed a amount of $40,000. Review of the RTF worksheet, completed on 10/05/2022, showed: -The average monthly balance for the facility's interest bearing account of $29,755.83; -The approved bond amount for this average monthly balance (Grand Total rounded to the nearest thousand x 1.5 =…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared foods in a form designed to meet the needs of individual residents when they did not ensure the puree (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) food had a smooth and appropriate consistency. This affected three residents identified by the facility as having orders for a pureed diet (Residents #8, #9, and #37). The facility census was 39. Review of the facility's Therapeutic Diets Policy, revised October 2017, showed: - Diet will be determined in accordance with the resident's informed choices, preferences, treatment goals and wishes; - A therapeutic diet is considered a part of treatment for a clinical condition, to modify nutrition or to alter the texture of the a diet for example: Altered consistency diet. Review of the facility's Puree Food Preparation Policy, revised November 2017, showed: - Pureed Diet: o Puree foods should be prepared in such a manner to prevent lumps or chunks; o The goal is a smooth, soft homogenous consistency similar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$168,230 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $53,865 — penalty dated 2026-04-21
  • $114,365 — penalty dated 2024-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JUCKETTE FAMILY HOMES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHILLICOTHE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2025
JUCKETTE, JOYCE EIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 11/03/2015
JUCKETTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/1972
JUCKETTE, HOLLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2015
NEUROTH, TERIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2015
STEELE, LISAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2015
STEELE, RANDALLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2009
BIESENTHAL, NICHOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2024
HUDLEMEYER, TERESAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2021
MANSOUR, KRISTIANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/26/2020
PLOWMAN, AUDREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
REDMOND, CHRISTINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$163K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 7%Other / private 29%

This home reported $163K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$263per resident / day
operating cost
$7,995per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$217per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265621. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next