Fulton Manor Care Center
520 Manor Drive, Fulton, MO 65251 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (573) 642-6834 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (86%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.5% | 18.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.9% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.1% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.3% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 63.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.9% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.9% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.62 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.05 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.5%CMS range 41.8–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 8.1–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.9–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 45.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.60 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.73 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 86% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to issue an appropriate emergency discharge notice for one resident (Resident #1) when the emergency discharge notice did not contain a location and failed to notify the Ombudsman of the emergency discharge to the hospital and refused to allow him/her to return to the facility when discharged from the hospital. The facility census was 48. 1. Review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge Emergency policy, dated 08/18, showed it did not direct staff in regard to appropriate discharge location, or in regards to contact information for the Ombudsman noted on the discharge to allow for an appeal when issuing an emergency transfer or discharge notice. 2. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/15/26, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and staff discharged him/her to the local hospital on 5/18/26.Review of the facility's emergency discharge notice, dated 05/18/26, showed staff documented the notice effective on 05/18/26 and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete a Criminal Background Check (CBC) for three employees (Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A, CNA B, and CNA C), out of three sampled employees, as required by the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) and facility policy. The facility's census was 45.1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 01/31/24, showed potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. The facility will maintain documentation of proof that the screening occurred. Review of the facility's Background Screening Investigations policy, dated 03/2019, showed Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants for positions with direct access to residents (direct access employs). The director of personnel, or designee, conducts background checks, reference checks and criminal conviction checks (including fingerprinting as may be required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free physical abuse, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B witnessed CNA A tie a sheet around the resident's upper body to restrain the resident to his/her wheelchair as a form of discipline to control the resident's behavior. The facility's census was 45.The administrator was notified on 04/27/26 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 04/16/26, when staff reported CNA A restrained the resident with a sheet to his/her wheelchair. On 04/16/26, staff assessed the resident for physical and psychological harm, the administrator investigated the allegation, notified the required parties and agencies, re-educated staff on the facility's abuse and neglect policy, and immediately terminated CNA A. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, dated 01/01/24, showed abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse means the individual must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the facility did not employ or engage staff who had a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property) on the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for one employee (CNA A) out of four sampled employees. The facility census was 45. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy, dated 01/31/24, showed it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; -Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. Review of the facility's policy, Background Screening Investigations, dated 03/2019, showed: -Our facility conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs of the residents, when staff failed to ensure call lights were placed within reach for four residents (Resident #4, #10, #48, and #295) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 01/01/25, showed the purpose of the policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance, and directed staff: -All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident's call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light; -All residents will be educated on how to call for help using the resident call system; -Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured, as needed; -The call system will be accessible to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide written notification information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital, or therapeutic leave for four (Resident #3, #14, #20, and #26) out of four sampled residents. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for Bed Hold. 2. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed: -discharged from the facility on 11/19/24 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Did not contain written documentation staff notified the resident or the resident's responsible party of the facility's bed-hold policy. 3. Review of Resident #14's medical record showed: -discharged from the facility on 12/31/24 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Did not contain written documentation staff notified the resident or the resident's responsible party of the facility's bed-hold policy. 4. Review of Resident's 20's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for five residents (Resident #20, #43, #45, #46, and #48) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans-Baseline', dated December 2016, showed a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission. 2. Review of Resident #20's electronic medical record (EMR), showed staff documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR did not contain documentation staff completed a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. 3. Review of Resident #43's EMR, showed staff documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR did not contain documentation staff completed a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. During an interview on 01/30/25 at 2:35 P.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said he/she was not sure why the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice when staff failed to obtain physician's orders for water flushes/flush medications with water per facility policy, failed to administer medications as directed by the physician and the medication administration record (MAR), and failed to ensure a licensed staff member documented medication administration via Gastric Tube (G-Tube), a surgically inserted tube which provides nutrition, hydration, or medicine directly into the stomach, for one resident (Resident #20) of one sampled resident. Licensed staff failed to perform colostomy (an opening in the abdomen to the intestines) care as directed by the physician for one resident (Resident #48) of one sampled resident. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications through and Enteral Tube, dated November 2018, showed: -Verify that there is a physician's medication order for the procedure; -Dilute crushed medication with at least 30 milliliters (ml) of purified water (or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide care to meet basic hygiene needs for four residents (Resident #24, #32, #35, and #48) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's, Bath, Shower/Tub Policy, dated February 2018, showed staff are directed: -The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; -Document the date and time the shower/bath was performed; -If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken; -Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath. 2. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 10/17/24, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Mild cognitive impairment; -Did not reject care (such as Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance); -Required partial assistance from staff with personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain signed consents for side rails and failed to complete side rail assessments for four residents (Resident #3, #15, #20 and #46), out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's Proper use of Side Rails Policy, undated, showed: -Examples of bedrails include, but are not limited to side rails, bed side rails, safety rails, grab bars, and assist bars; -The resident assessment must assess the resident's risk from using bed rails such as entrapment; -The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself; -Informed consent from the resident or resident representative must be obtained after appropriate alternative have been attempted prior to installation and use of bed rails; -Upon receiving informed consent, the facility will obtain a physician's order for the use of the specified bed rail and medical diagnosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff in accordance with their Facility Assessment to meet the needs of the residents. Staff failed to provide care to meet basic hygiene needs for four residents (Resident #24, #32, #35, and #48) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 01/07/25, showed direct care staff required to care for their facility census: -Days- Five nurse aides with census above 43 or three-four nurse aides with census lower than 40; -Evenings- Four nurse aides with census above 43 or two-three nurse aides with census below 40; -Nights- Two nurse aides; -Staffing plan is to ensure that facility has sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time. Review of the employee schedule, dated August 2024, with average census of 42, showed: -Thursday 08/01/24: one nurse aide on day shift; -Friday 08/02/24: one nurse aide on night shift; -Saturday 08/03/24: two nurse aides on day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN), for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Services-Registered Nurse (RN), dated 01/01/24, showed the facility will utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. 2. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated July 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN, eight consecutive hours a day, in the building for the dates of: -Monday, 07/01/24; -Tuesday, 07/02/24; -Wednesday, 07/03/24; -Thursday, 07/04/24; -Monday, 07/08/24; -Tuesday, 07/09/24; -Wednesday, 07/10/24; -Thursday, 07/11/24; -Friday, 07/12/24; -Saturday, 07/13/24; -Sunday, 07/14/24; -Monday, 07/15/24; -Tuesday, 07/16/24; -Wednesday, 07/17/24; -Thursday, 07/18/24; -Monday, 07/22/24; -Wednesday, 07/24/24; -Thursday, 07/25/24; -Monday, 07/29/24; -Tuesday, 07/30/24; -Wednesday, 07/31/24. 3. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required nurse staffing information, which included the facility census, the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis in an area readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 43. 1.Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated 07/2016, showed: -Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) in a clear and readable format; -Shift staffing information shall be recorded on the Daily Staffing form for each shift, the information recorded on the form shall include: -The name of the facility; -The date for which the information is posted; -The resident census at the beginning of the shift for which the information is posted; -Twenty-four hour shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%). Out of 32 opportunities observed, nine errors occurred, resulting in a 28.13% error rate, which affected one resident (Resident #20) out of four sampled residents. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors, dated 01/01/24, showed the facility must ensure that it is free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated April 2019, showed: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders); -The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Review of the facility's Medication Pass times, provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the dish washing machine operated according to manufacturer's instructions in a manner adequate to prevent cross contamination of kitchen wares. Facility staff failed to properly sanitize soiled kitchen wares to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed to maintain an ice machine drain air gap. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's Dishwashing: Machine Operation policy, dated 2020, showed staff were instructed to: -Operate dishwashing machines according to manufacturer recommendations; -Record log documents twice daily for either final rinse temperature (high temperature machine) or sanitizer concentration (low temperature machine with chemical sanitizer); -If the machine is found to be out of the acceptable range for either final rinse temperature or proper chemical sanitizing concentration, do not proceed to wash dishes; -After troubleshooting, if the dish washing machine is not functioning, the employee should contact the Dining Services Manager or maintenance or outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement an effective Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which included documentation and implementation of on-going systemic issues with resolution. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for QA/QAPI program. During an interview on 01/30/25 at 10:23 A.M., the administrator said the department heads come together quarterly and discuss different items within the facility, however there is no documentation to provide about these meetings or issues and resolutions. The administrator said she was not aware the information needed to be documented and maintained.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the two-step purified protein derivative ((PPD) skin test for Tuberculosis (TB)) were completed in accordance with their policy for six employees (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, Nurse Aide (NA) B, NA C, NA D, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E, and Dietary aide F) out of ten employee files reviewed. Facility staff failed to implement the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy when they did not educate, or alert staff of residents who required EBP, and failed to place appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in close proximity for three residents (Resident #20, #45, and #48) of three sampled residents. The facility's cenus was 43. 1. Review of the Facility's Employee Screening for TB, revised August 2019, showed: -All employees are screened for latent tuberculosis (LTBI) and active TB disease, using tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) and symptom screening prior to beginning employment; -Each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four residents (Residents #3, #15, #20, and #46) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed staff did not provide a policy for Entrapment Risk Assessments. Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, undated, showed the facility will assure the correct installation and maintenance of bed rails prior to use ensuring that the beds dimensions are appropriate for the resident by: -Confirming the bed rails are appropriate for the size and weight of the resident using the bed; -Inspecting and regularly checking the mattress and bed rails for ares of possible entrapment; -Ensuring the bed frame, bed rail, and mattress do not leave a gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to ensure residents' personal information and privacy was protected when staff left the computer screen open in public hallways for two residents (Resident #9 and #13) of 16 sampled residents, and failed to close the privacy curtain and window blinds/curtain during incontinence care for one resident (Resident #48) out of two sampled residents observed during care. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, dated 01/01/24, showed: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, feeling of self-worth and self-esteem; -Staff protect confidential clinical information; -Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 2. Observation on 01/28/25 at 8:18 A.M., showed the medication cart across from the nurses' station on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete the required Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment, within the required time frame for three residents (Residents #20, #24 and #48) of six sampled residents. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated July 2017, showed staff are directed: -The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring the resident assessments are submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation Service (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with the current federal and state guidelines; -Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual; -Submission of MDS records to the QIES ASAP is electronic. A hard copy of each record submitted is maintained in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for three residents (Resident #1, #15, and #16) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 01/01/24, showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment; -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents' condition change. 2. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) remained free from physical abuse when Resident #2 who had a history of physical aggression grabbed Resident #1's arm. The facility census was 39. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy, dated 1/31/24, showed abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Review showed physical abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. 2. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool used to plan care, dated 9/08/24, showed staff assessed the resident with cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's plan of care, updated 12/12/24, showed staff were directed to notify the provider if the resident poses a threat to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, facility staff failed to prevent the misappropriation of money from one resident's (Resident #1's) checking account when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I cashed a check from the resident for his/her personal use. The facility census was 43. The administrator was notified on 8/12/24 of past Non-Compliance which occurred on 6/22/24. On 7/27/24, facility staff reported CNA I received, accepted, and cashed a check in the amount of $400.00 from a resident on 6/22/24. Upon discovery 7/27/24, facility staff began an investigation. Facility staff notified the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), local police department, and the residents physician. Facility staff completed an investgation and all staff inserviced on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation by 7/30/24. CNA I terminated on 7/27/24 for misappropriation of resident money. Staff corrected the deficient practice on 7/30/24. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 01/31/24 showed: -The facility will provide protection for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, staff failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure resident safety when facility staff allowed Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) A who was accused of abuse of one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents to continue to have contact with residents. The facility census was 36. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, dated November, 2017, showed each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Resident who reside in our facilities will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. Any alleged perpetrator of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident funds, will be immediately suspended from employment and will leave the employment property and not return to the property and not return to the property until the investigation by the facility and/or law enforcement is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-09 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. The census was 37. 1. Review of facility provided policies showed they did not contain a policy related to the qualifications of kitchen staff. Review of facility provided e-mails showed the consultant dietician requested the current Dietary Supervisor's enrollment in the on-line Certified Dietary Manager's (CDM) course on 08/29/23. Review showed the consultant dietician provided the administrator with the Dietary Supervisor's login information for the on-line CDM course on 08/31/23. During an interview on 02/06/24 at 9:55 A.M., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) said he/she was not a CDM. The DS said he/she was hired as a cook and moved to the DS position a few months ago. The DS said he/she does not have any current food safety training but he/she had 13 or 14 years of nursing home kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to serve food in accordance with the nutritionally calculated menus and standardized recipes. Facility staff failed to inform residents what meals were being served and when changes were made to the menus. The census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Pureed Diet policy, dated 2022, showed staff were directed to weigh or measure the number of drained portions required for the standardized recipe. Review showed the policy directed staff to serve with appropriate scoop number or divide equally to provide number of portions. Review of the facility's Mechanical Soft Diet policy, dated 2022, showed the policy did not contain direction related to portion sizes. Review of the standardized recipe for ground ham steak with gravy showed staff are instructed to place prepared ham in a washed and sanitized food processor; grind to the texture of fine hamburger. Final internal cooking temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Place in steam table pans with enough prepared low sodium (salt) broth to keep moist.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain kitchen cleanliness in a manner to prevent potential food contamination. Facility staff failed to store food in a manner to prevent potential contamination and outdated use. Facility staff failed to maintain and serve food at temperatures adequate to prevent food borne illness. Facility staff failed to sanitize kitchen wares in a manner to prevent contamination, and to store dish wares in a manner to prevent cross-contamination when staff stacked dish wares together wet. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the policies provided by the facility showed the policies did not contain guidance related to kitchen cleaning. Review of the facility's Ice Machines and Portable Ice Carts policy, dated 2024, showed: -Ice machines will be cleaned at a frequency specified by the manufacturer or, if the manufacturer specifications are absent, at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil or mold; -The ice machine or carts will be cleaned at any time contamination may have occurred or when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, facility staff failed to appropriately perform hand hygiene during wound care, perineal care and catheter care for one resident (Resident #30), failed to perform hand hygiene during perineal care for one resident (Resident #16), failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during medication administration, and failed to change and store oxygen tubing in a manner to decrease the risk of the spread of infection for four residents (Resident #3, #11, #23, and #142). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy, reviewed January 2024,showed: -Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice; -Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed when hands are visibly dirty, between resident contacts, after handling contaminated objects, before performing invasive procedures, before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide refunds of personal funds to residents from the facility operating account in a timely manner for nine residents (Resident #1, #5, #7, #8, #10, #12, #14, #15, and #17) discharged from the facility. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the Facility's Resident Personal Fund policy, dated January 2024, showed: -The facility will establish and maintain a system that assures a full and complete and separate accounting of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf. The system will preclude any comingling of resident funds with facility funds; -Upon the discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility will convey within 30 days the resident's funds with a final account of those funds to the resident, or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with state law. 2. Review of the facility's maintained Accounts Receivable Report, from 01/01/23 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when failed to repair a door covering, stored a bed side commode lid on the floor next to the sink and stored a wash basin on the floor in the bathroom by the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff failed to maintain and clean the portable ice chest and failed to maintain the front entranceway free of cigarette butts. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Safe and Homelike policy, reviewed January 2024, showed: -The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that deemphasized the institutional character of the setting; -Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment; -Report any unresolved environmental concerns to the Administrator. Review of the facility's Quality of Life - Homelike Environment policy, reviewed January 24, showed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one resident's (Resident #25) indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care and failed to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter which included an indication for the use, catheter care, and catheter/balloon size for one resident (Resident #30). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Appropriate Use of Indwelling Catheters policy, reviewed January 2024 showed the following: -An indwelling catheter will be utilized only when a resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary; -Residents admitted with an indwelling catheter, will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary; -Use of an indwelling urinary catheter will be in accordance with the physician orders, which will include the diagnosis or clinical condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to assist five residents (Resident #3, #11. #18, #38, and #142) out of 12 sampled dependent residents with grooming and bathing. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated March 2018, showed staff were directed as follows: -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLS); -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene; -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). 2. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to propel four residents (Resident #11, #13, #18 and #43) in wheelchairs with foot pedals, failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfers for two residents (Residents #16 and #22), and failed to secure chemicals and disposable razors in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's No Pedals, No Push policy, dated June 2013, showed: -Staff will be aware to place foot pedals on wheelchairs if staff is going to push a resident to prevent a resident from having to hold up his/her own legs potentially causing a resident to drop their legs and throwing them out of the wheelchair; -If a resident requires the assistance of staff to push a wheelchair, the staff must place foot pedals on the wheelchair and position the resident's feet on the footrests prior to assisting the resident. 2. Observation on 02/07/24 at 7:59 A.M., showed Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) E propelled Resident #11 from the dining room to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) which included an indication for the use, catheter care, and catheter/balloon size for one resident (Resident #30), failed to obtain an updated physician order and administer catheter care for one resident (Resident #25).The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Appropriate Use of Indwelling Catheters policy, reviewed January 2024, showed an indwelling catheter will be utilized only when a resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary. Review showed: -Residents admitted with an indwelling catheter, will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary; -Use of an indwelling urinary catheter will be in accordance with the physician orders, which will include the diagnosis or clinical condition making the use of the catheter necessary, size of the catheter, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to accurately complete entrapment assessments, bedrail assessments, and obtain consents for the use of bed rails for four residents (Resident #6, #16, #32, and #142). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Bed Safety and Bed Rails policy, dated August 2022, showed: -Bed frames, mattresses and bed rails are checked for compatibility and size prior to use; -Bed dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size; -Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and/or depth, the bed frame, bed rail and mattress will leave not gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body. Any gaps in bed system are within the safety dimensions established by Food and Drug Administration (FDA); -Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks; -Bed rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are in a variety of types,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate skills and competencies to meet the care needs for the residents by not providing in-services or reevaluating and documenting skills and competencies on a regular basis for each employee. The facility census was 37 residents. 1. Review of the facility's Competency Evaluation policy, updated [DATE] showed it is the policy of this facility to evaluate each employee to assure appropriate competencies and skills for performing his or her job and to meet the needs of facility residents. Review showed: -The knowledge and skills required among staff to meet residents' needs are determined through the facility assessment process; -Evaluating competency of staff is accomplished through the facility's training program; -Initial competency is evaluated during the orientation process. An employee remains on orientation until all competencies are verified; -Subsequent and/or annual competency is evaluated at a frequency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, reviewed January 2024, showed the purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. If an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the following elements: -Drug name; -Dose; -Frequency of administration; -Duration of treatment (start and stop date) or (number of days of therapy); -Route of administration; -Indication of use. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control policy, reviewed May 2023, showed: -An antibiotic stewardship program will be implemented part of the overall infection prevention and control program; -Antibiotic use and protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use will be implemented as part of the antibiotic stewardship program; -The infection preventionist, with oversight from the Director of Nursing (DON) serves as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents (Resident #6, and #29). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, reviewed January 2024 showed: -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment; -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes; incorporate identified problem areas; incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's condition change; -The IDT must review and update the care plan when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to update care plans with intervention for pressure ulcers, and complete weekly skin assessments after development of pressure ulcer for two residents (Resident #29 and #30). Facility staff failed to notify one resident (Resident #29) physician and family of new pressure ulcers and failed to recieve an treatment order and an order for wound care consult. Facility staff failed to initiate a wound care consult and did not document they provided physician order treatments for one resident (Resident #30). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Prevention of Pressure Injuries policy, dated April 2020, showed staff are directed to: -Assess the resident on admission for existing pressure injury risk factors. Repeat weekly and upon any changes in condition. -Use a standardized pressure injury screening tool to determine and document risk factors; -Supplement the use of a risk assessment tool with assessment of additional risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medication orders were limited to 14 days unless specific duration and clinical rationale were provided for one resident (Resident #25). The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Gradual Dose Reduction of Psychotropic Drugs policy, reviewed 01/01/24, showed residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue those drugs. The policy did not give direction for responses to GDR recommendations from the pharmacist or physician or for 14-day as needed psychotropic medications. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, reviewed 01/01/24, showed the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. -If a resident uses as needed medications frequently, the attending physician and Interdisciplinary Care Team, with support of the Consultant Pharmacist as needed, shall reevaluate the situation, examine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, facility staff failed to store medication in a safe and effective manner. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy, dated 01/01/24, showed facility staff were directed as follows: -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing; -Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 2. Observation on 02/08/24 at 01:25 P.M., showed the medication storage room contained: -Two bottles of drug buster ( a chemical used to destroy medications) stored on the same shelf as active residents medications, as well as above other residents medications; -Two 4.5 ounce (oz) bottles of enema lubricate laxative (to treat constipation) with an expiration date of January 2024; -One bottle of 400 milligram (mg) Magnesium Oxide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner and to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary to prevent cross-contamination. This failure had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 32. 1. Review of the facility's Dietary Cleaning and Sanitation policy, undated, showed: - The floors shall be swept and mopped prior to the end of each shift; - The floors shall be swept and mopped if they become dirty; - Ovens need to be cleaned on a regular basis and whenever they are soiled; - Cabinets and drawers should be cleaned on a regular basis and whenever they are soiled. Review of the facility's Daily Checklist for cleaning, undated, showed: - The dietary aid to wipe down wall tiles of any visible splashes, wipe down trash cans, and sweep and mop the dishwashing area; - The day cook to wipe down trash can and sweep after every meal; - The evening cook to wipe down trash can, sweep after every meal, and mop at end of shift; - The checklists did not address the bulk bins. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure razors/sharps and hazardous chemicals were stored in safe manner not accessible to residents when staff failed to lock an unattended medication storage room and unlocked medication cart and failed to provide safe mechanical lift transfers for two residents (Residents #20 and #30) in a manner to prevent accidents. The facility census was 32. 1. Review of the facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy, dated July 2017 showed: -Our individualized, resident-centered approach to safety addresses safety and accident hazards for individual residents; -The care team shall target interventions to reduce individual risks related to hazards in the environment, including adequate supervision and assistive devices. 2. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/22/22, showed facility staff assessed the resident as follows: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #6 and #15) of six sampled residents. The facility census was 32. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy dated March 2022 showed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment, and no more than 21 days after admission. 2. Review of Resident #6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/16/22, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Moderate depression; -Physical behaviors directed toward others on 1-3 days; -Behaviors significantly interfere with the resident's care; -Total dependence for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, locomotion, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation (rapid heart beat of upper heart chambers), heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain a physician order for the use of oxygen for one resident (Resident #27). The facility census was 32. 1. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Orders policy, revised July 2016, showed: -Medication shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state; -Drug and biological orders must be recorded on the Physician's Order Sheet in the resident's chart. Review of policies provided by the facility showed they did not provide a policy specific to oxygen administration. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment tool, dated 11/17/22, showed facility staff assessed the resident as follows: -Diagnoses included asthma; -Did not receive oxygen while a resident or while not a resident. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2022, showed the record did not contain an order for oxygen. Observation on 12/13/22 at 10:47 A.M., showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, facility staff failed to prepare pureed food according to recipes, to ensure residents with pureed diets received all items on the menu, and to serve pureed food at the appropriate consistency. This failure had the potential to affect two out of two residents (Resident #16 and #19) who received a pureed diet. The census was 32. 1. Review of the facility's Standardized Recipes policy, undated, showed standardized recipes will be used for all menu items, including pureed and therapeutic diets. Review of the diet spreadsheet for residents with pureed diets showed, staff directed to prepare pureed beef cube steak, pureed creamed corn, pureed stewed tomatoes, pureed buttered dinner roll, and pureed bread pudding for the resident's lunch meal. Review of the pureed bread pudding recipe showed, staff directed to: - Place two-and-a-half cups bread pudding into food processor; - Add three quarters cup milk gradually; - Blend until smooth; - Achieve a smooth, pudding or soft mashed potato consistency. Observation on 12/13/22 at 11:15 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor and track antibiotic use within the facility. The facility census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for Antibiotic Stewardship. Review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program showed facility staff did not have a process in place to track and trend antibiotic usage. During an interview on 01/28/25 at 8:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he has the Infection Preventionist but has only been employed at the facility for eight days. He said he is unsure what was being done before he came, but unfortunately he does not have an antibiotic stewardship program to provide. During an interview on 01/28/25 at 9:30 A.M., Corporate Nurse said the previous DON did not track and trend antibiotic use in the facility. He/She said To be honest, no one has been doing it and we will use this as a learning experience. During an interview on 01/30/25 at 4:09 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-09 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the most recent survey results were posted and readily accessible to residents, family member or representatives of residents. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Availability of Survey Results Policy, reviewed January 2024, showed: -A readable copy of our facility's most recent federal and/or state survey report and plan of correction for any identified deficiencies is maintained in a 3-ring loose-leaf binder titled Results of Most Recent Survey; -The Survey binder is located in the main lobby and is available for review by interested persons who wish to review information relative to our facility's compliance with federal and state rules, regulations, and guidelines governing our facility's operation; -A representative of management is assigned the responsibility of making weekly inspections of the survey binder to ensure that the binder contains current information, is located in its designated area, and is readily accessible without one having to ask staff members for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide residents with a written response to grievances. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, dated 01/01/24, showed staff were directed as follows. -The grievance officer is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances; issuing written grievance decisions to the residents; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations; -Upon request, the facility will give a copy of this grievance policy of the resident; -In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the grievance official will issue a written decision on the grievances to the resident or representative a the conclusion of the investigation. Review of the Resident Council minutes, dated November 2023, December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to post the required nurse staffing information, which included the resident census, and the total number of staff and the actual hours worked, by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift, on a daily basis in an area readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility failed to maintain the posted nursing staff data for 18 months. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, reviewed 1/1/24, showed: -Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of Licensed Nurses: Registered Nurses (RN's), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN's), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN's), and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format; - Directly responsible for resident care means individuals are responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JUCKETTE FAMILY HOMES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUCKETTE, JOYCE E | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/10/2026 |
| JUCKETTE, HOLLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/03/2015 |
| NEUROTH, TERI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/03/2015 |
| STEELE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/03/2015 |
| STEELE, RANDALL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/03/2015 |
| CURANA HEALTH OF MISSOURI-KANSAS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| JUCKETTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2026 |
| BAKERY-BEY, REBECCA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2023 |
| BIESENTHAL, NICHOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2024 |
| HUDLEMEYER, TERESA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| MANSOUR, KRISTIANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/26/2020 |
| PLOWMAN, AUDREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/24/2025 |
| THRASHER, TERRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $87K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265760. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.