Warrensburg Manor Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 45.6 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) were utilized eight hours per day, seven days per week and failed to ensure a Director of Nursing (DON) or interim DON was onsite full -time 8 hours a day for a minimum of 40 hours a per week. The facility census was 43 residents. Review of the facility Policy for Nursing Services-RN revised 1/1/24 showed: -It is the intent of the facility to comply with RN staffing requirements. -The facility will utilize the services of a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. -The facility will designate a RN to serve as the DON on a fulltime basis. -The DON may serve as a charge nurse only when the facility has a average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. -The facility was responsible for submitting timely and accurate staffing data through the CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ staffing data submitted to Center of Medicare & Medicaid services by long term care facilities)) system. Review of the facility's policy for DON Services revised on 8/2006 showed: -The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) was accurate for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 43 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes dated July 2017 showed the MDS Coordinator or designee was responsible for ensuring that resident assessments were submitted in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. 1. Review of Resident #2's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a disease process that decreases the ability of the lungs to perform ventilation). -Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease (heart problems caused by narrowed heart arteries that supply blood to the heart). -Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). -Acute Respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered, individualized care plan describing care and services furnished by the facility to treat a resident for edema (swelling due to the retention of fluid) was developed for one sampled resident (Resident #8)and failed to complete a comprehensive care plan that included nutritional status for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 43 residents. 1. Review of Resident #8's care plan, dated 2/1/24, showed: -A focus of decreased cardiac output related to congestive heart failure (a disease in which the heart functions at a reduced capacity). -An intervention to evaluate the resident for edema with no specific schedule on when to do so. -No information regarding the resident's active edema including interventions or goals. -No information regarding the resident's orders for compression pumps or compression wraps. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to determine the root cause and fall follow-up report of a resident's fall, failed to update the resident's care plan with appropriate interventions and monitor the effectiveness of interventions to prevent additional falls for one sampled resident (Resident #33) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 43 residents. Review of the facility's Fall Assessing and their Cause revised 10/2010 showed: -The purpose of this procedure was to provide guidelines for assessing after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall. -Incident report must be completed for resident falls; The incident report form should be completed by nursing supervisor on duty at the time and submitted to the Director of Nursing Services no later than 24 hours after the fall occurs. -Within 24 hours of the fall, the nursing staff will begin to identify possible likely cause of the incident. They will refer to resident -specific evidence including medical history, known functional impairment, etc…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored and changed using proper infection control practices when not in use and in a timely manner for three sampled residents (Resident #1, #40,and #37) out of 14 sampled residents. The census was 43 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated 1/1/24 showed: -The resident's care plan should identify the interventions for oxygen therapy, based upon the resident's assessment and orders, such as, but not limited to: --The type of oxygen delivery system. --When to administer, such as continuous or intermittent and/or when to discontinue. --Equipment setting for the prescribed flow rates. --Monitoring of oxygen saturation levels (the amount of oxygen in the blood with a normal range of 96% to 100%) and/or vital signs as ordered. --Monitoring for complications associated with the use of oxygen. -Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe secure storage of cleaning chemicals including liquid laundry soap and a liquid bleach bottle for one sampled resident (Resident #33) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 43 residents. Review of the facility's undated Chemical Storage policy showed: -Chemicals should never be left within reach of a resident and must always be properly stored. -Residents may not have personal chemicals stored in their rooms. Review of the facility's undated Important information for residents and families showed items that cannot be brought into the nursing home due to State and Federal regulations included but was not limited to: Bleach and Laundry detergents provided by facility. 1. Review of Resident #33's face-sheet showed he/she had diagnoses of: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #1), out of 7 sampled residents, was free from resident to resident abuse. On 7/30/23 around 1:00 A.M., Resident #2 entered Resident #1's room and was found with his/her hand under Resident #1's shirt, touching his/her breast. The facility census was 50 residents. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol policy dated July 2017 showed: -Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, could cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. -It included verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse. -Sexual abuse was defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a safe medication storage system in place regarding the facility's Cubex system (a smart cabinet that secures different types of medications that can be dispensed when accessed) by not monitoring and reconciling the medications in the Cubex. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received medications from the Cubex system. The facility census was 53 residents. A policy for the Cubex was requested and was not received at the time of exit. Record review of the facility's pharmacy undated policy titled MEDBANK CUBEX Station Policy and Procedures showed: -Nursing and pharmacy staff will use the MEDBANK Station as an inventory, charging, and information system for the control and distribution of medications for emergency, first-dose use, and other situations where medications are not readily available from the pharmacy until the next scheduled delivery. -All medications removed from the MEDBANK Station will be reviewed and profiled by a pharmacist within 24 hours of removal from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ceiling fan in the dry good storage room and the wall mounted fan in the main kitchen were maintained free of a heavy buildup of dust; to ensure the light fixtures were free from a heavy buildup of dust; to ensure the faucet at the three compartment sink operated properly so it would not continue to leak a stream of water after the valves were turned off; to maintain the floors under the reach in refrigerators and the six burner stove, free of food crumbs and debris; and to maintain the gasket (a piece of rubber or some other material that is used to make a tight seal between two parts that are joined together) of one refrigerator in good repair. This practice potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 53 residents. 1. Observations on 2/8/23 from 6:40 A.M. through 8:50 A.M., showed: - A heavy buildup of dust on the blades and the grate (the metal covering of an object) of the wall mounted fan in the main kitchen. - A heavy buildup of dust on the ceiling fan in the dry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were performed in order to prevent cross contamination and spread of infection by not following their policy when an outbreak had been identified by not educating all staff, notifying visitors, posting signs, identifying exposed residents, and monitoring hand hygiene; failed to implement transmission based precautions and isolation for residents with known signs and symptoms of a norovirus (a group of viruses that cause a sudden onset of severe vomiting and diarrhea). Facility staff failed to ensure the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was to be utilized while providing personal cares for three sampled resident and handwashing during care (Resident #43, #156, and #31); failed to implement transmission based precautions and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed and appropriate glove changes were completed while handling respiratory equipment and performing a blood sugar test with Insulin (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JUCKETTE FAMILY HOMES — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $113K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO