Parkwood Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
3201 Parkwood Lane, Maryland Heights, MO 63043 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (314) 291-5911 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.5% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.3% | 25.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.5% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.6% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.6% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 38.3% | 26.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.1% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 84.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, refers to any medical intervention used to restore circulatory and/or respiratory function that has ceased) for one resident (Resident #80) per the resident's wishes. Resident #80 was found to be unresponsive and without signs of life. Staff began CPR, then stopped. When Emergency Medical Services (EMS, 911, first responders, paramedics, police officers and/or fire fighters) arrived, staff were not performing CPR. The sample was 19. The census was 92. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] at 1:44 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) of past non-compliance which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE], the Administrator became aware of the deficient practice to not administer CPR to a resident who wished to receive it. On [DATE] through [DATE], the facility in-serviced staff on the code status policy. The IJ was corrected on [DATE]. Review of the facility's Advance Directives Policy, undated, showed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's admission physician orders, including current gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide hydration, nutrition, and medications) feeding orders and a complete medication list, for one resident admitted to the facility for a respite stay (Resident #2). During the resident's stay, the facility failed to transcribe a new physician's order for added g-tube water flushes and a change to g-tube feedings from bolus (single/specified dose given all at once) to continuous. These deficient practices resulted in the resident not receiving all prescribed medications, water flushes, or continuous g-tube feedings throughout the day. The sample was 3. The census was 83.Review of the facility's Admissions policy and procedure, last reviewed 10/30/24, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of this policy and procedure is to facilitate a fluid transition of a resident into the skilled nursing facility;-Procedure:--Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure orders for weight monitoring were completed as ordered. Concerns were noted in four of five residents identified by the facility as receiving dialysis services (Resident's #6, #9, #10 and #12). The resident sample was 11. The census was 85.Review of the facility's Physician's Orders policy, revised 4/16/2024, showed:-The purpose of the policy is to transcribe and follow physician orders accurately;-Orders received by the physician are to be followed as prescribed. In the event that a resident refuses, documentation must be completed and the physician must be notified. Review of the facility's Dialysis policy, revised 4/16/2024, showed:-Ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration between the nursing home and the dialysis staff is imperative in providing optimal care for the resident;-For a resident receiving dialysis, the charge nurse will communicate with the attending physician/practitioner, resident/resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when staff left one resident's topical gel and inhaler in the resident's room (Resident #6). The resident had not been assessed as safe to self-administer medications and did not have an order to self-administer medications. The sample was 7. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medication policy, dated 6/1/2018, showed:-Policy: in order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer;- If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time), physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process;-For those residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards when staff failed to follow physician orders when staff provided wound care for one resident (Resident #5). The sample was 7. The census was 86. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy, dated revised October 2023, showed when a Physician gives orders on any resident, nursing staff will have the orders written in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and/or Treatment Administration Record (TAR) of the medical record of the resident. Nursing staff will follow through with any order(s) that were provided by the physician in the time frame given by the physician. 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included: high blood pressure, diabetes and heart failure;-A physician order summary dated 11/15/25 through 11/25/25, showed a physician order to cleanse one time per day, bilateral (both) lower extremities with Vashe (wound cleanser), soak 3-5 minutes; apply silver wound gel (antimicrobial wound gel designed to provide a moist healing environment) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident's responsible party regarding the resident's pressure wound (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) and when the resident's pressure wound condition deteriorated. The facility also failed to notify the resident's responsible party regarding new medications ordered for the resident's behaviors (Resident # 2). The sample was five. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Change in Condition Policy, revised 8/13/25, showed:-The facility provides medical care to all the residents in this community with all their varied diagnosis and medical conditions. If a resident has a change in condition at any time during their stay at the facility, the nurse will be made aware immediately and call the physician. The nurse will provide any services that the doctor orders from the result of the change in condition. The nurse will contact the family and/or responsible party after the physician has given the orders for care of the change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a pressure wound (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) was assessed and monitored by performing accurate skin assessments on admission and weekly (Resident #2). The sample size was five. The census was 89. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer: Prevention and Findings Reporting policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: To prevent Pressure ulcers by identifying residents at risk; To treat an identified pressure ulcer as soon as possible and initiate treatment.-Policy and Procedure: The Braden scale is used as an instrument to identify skin at risk for breakdown. The Braden scale is done upon admission and quarterly. The Charge Nurse is to complete a skin assessment at least weekly, and at any time a care provider reports a change in the appearance of the skin. The Charge Nurse will complete an initial approximate measure and description of the wound in the nurse's notes. The Wound Nurse will assess the skin area of concerns and will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy by not reporting an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1). Resident #1 reported an abuse allegation to staff, and the facility failed to notify the regulatory authority as required by their policy and state/federal regulations. The facility census was 84. Review of the facility's undated Abuse Policy and Procedures/Investigation Protocols showed the following:-The facility is committed to protecting residents from mistreatment, neglect, abuse and misappropriation of resident property. -This facility has adopted the guidelines of the Department of Health and Senior Services, as well as Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for defining abuse, reporting, investigating and responding to appropriate parties. -The facility will ensure al alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe one resident's treatment orders in the medical record when the resident was readmitted to the hospital (Resident #1) and failed to accurately document completed wound treatments or treatment refusals by the resident on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for three residents (Residents #1, #4 and #2). The sample was 4. The census was 82.Review of the facility's Documenting/Implementing Doctors Orders policy, dated revised February 2025, showed:-Documentation: record all orders in the residents' chart. Review of the facility's Documentation policy, dated revised February 2025, showed:-Purpose: ensure resident clinical records are accurate, complete, secure, and compliant with facility requirements and professional standards;-Maintain clinical records complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized on each nursing unit;-Include essential documentation: admission assessments, diagnoses, care plans,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity when staff spoke to one resident in a disrespectful manner regarding the resident's hygiene and failed to provide care to promote his/her dignity (Resident #9), staff failed to provide one resident with grooming and feeding assistance (Resident #168) and staff entered one resident's room without knocking (Resident #34). In addition, staff failed to wear name badges to identify themselves to residents. The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Review of the facility's undated Resident Privacy/Dignity/Customer Service policy, showed: -Staff will always aim to communicate with residents in a manner which respects their individuality and needs, taking their view and needs into account; -Staff will protect the dignity, particularly modesty, of very ill or confused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident requests for less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents) are honored within the same day, and the facility failed to ensure resident funds in excess of $100.00 (or $50.00 for Medicaid residents), were held in an interest-bearing account. This affected 40 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 76. 1. During a group interview on 8/29/24 at 10:04 A.M., seven residents, whom the facility identified as cognitively intact, said requests for personal funds are limited to $20.00. If a resident wants more than $20.00, they have to wait. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 11:03 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said she handles requests for cash made by residents who have funds held by the facility. She usually only does $20.00 for cash withdrawals. She prefers to do smaller amounts like $20.00, in case the resident misplaces their money. Years ago, she was told residents could only get $20.00 per day, unless they go out of the facility, at which point they can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms and medical equipment and resident common areas were clean and homelike, affecting 13 of 17 sampled (Residents #9, #24, #43, #69, #32, #55, #27, #2, #50, #4, #269, #47 and #45). The facility also failed to ensure the 200 veranda hallway had clean floors. The census was 67. Review of the facility's housekeeping disinfecting cleaning schedule, revised 2/24/23, showed: -Housekeeping staff is responsible for the cleaning and disinfection of resident's room. Staff have responsibilities that are scheduled on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. Housekeepers are responsible for every resident room on their halls which includes suites, gardens and terrace; -Disinfects bathrooms toilet and rails. Wipe sink and clean mirrors with Spic and Span. If nursing staff has to change sheets make sure the bed is disinfected with chemicals depending if the room is a deep clean or vacant room make sure bed is made. Sweep rooms starting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility to develop a policy for and complete background checks for all newly hired employees, to include the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry (checks for Federal Indicators (FI) given to individuals found guilty of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property) for thee of five newly hired employees sampled. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Policy on Background Checks, revised 8/29/24, showed: -The facility will conduct background checks on all employees before they start working at the facility; -Upon hire background checks will be completed two days prior to the employee start date; -Human Resources (HR) will conduct an annual Family Care Safety screening and quarterly Employee Disqualification List (EDL) screening; -The policy failed to identify which background checks will be completed prior to hire; -The policy failed to require the NA Registry check for all staff to ensure the staff has no Federal Indicators. Review of Dietary Aide P's employee file, showed: -Date of hire 6/6/24; -No NA registry check. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene. Resident #9 was not provided care after having a bowel movement and getting that bowel movement on his/her hands. In addition, the resident was not checked for incontinence or cleaned, resulting in the resident's brief being saturated through his/her pants (Resident #9). One resident was not provided showers or hair washing for an extended period of time and the hair care that was provided was not sufficient to cleanse the hair, resulting in the resident's hair becoming matted in a hard thick clump (Resident #32). In addition, staff failed to provide basic activities of daily living to include brushing residents' hair, providing feeding assistance, providing baths and/or showers, and providing nail care for four residents (Residents #168, #269, #29, and #16). The sample…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide individual activities designed to meet the interests of and to support the psychosocial well-being of each resident, in accordance with needs and preferences for three residents (Residents #32, #9, and #55). The census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/1/24, showed: -Resident rarely/never understood; -Dependent on assistance for mobility; -Somewhat important to resident to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read; -Somewhat important to resident to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good; -Somewhat important to resident to participate in religious services or practices; -Very important to resident to listen to music he/she likes; -Very important to resident to do things with groups of people; -Very important to resident to do his/her favorite activities; -Diagnoses included dementia, Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activity program was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated 11/2/23, showed: -Facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for the resident population every day and during emergencies included: -Therapy services (e.g., activities professionals); -In addition to nursing staff, other staff needed for behavioral healthcare and services included Activity Director; -Staff training/education and competencies: Upon hire, all staff go through formal orientation for education and competency testing; -No documentation regarding the training requirement for a qualified Activity Director. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 12:11 P.M., the Activity Director said she began working in her position with the facility in February 2024. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 2:13 P.M., the Activity Director said she had no training in activities when she began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for three out of three medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Narcotic Count Change of Shift Policy, dated 1/4/23, showed: -Narcotics must be counted with the nurse or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) at the change of shift; The nurse and CMT must count the total number or cards and packages and note total on count sheet; Each care and package must be counted to ensure that the total number of narcotics is accurate and matches that total number of narcotics in the card or package; The nurse or CMT arriving for their shift and leaving their shift must initial the change of shift count sheet; If any discrepancies are noted at the change of shift the nurse or CMT are to notify the Director of Nursing (DON) or nursing management immediately. 1. Observation on 8/26/24 at 11:35 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals stored in a medication room refrigerator had a temperature log in one of two medication rooms observed. In addition, staff failed to keep a medication cart locked when left unattended. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy dated, 6/1/18, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier; -Procedures: All medications are maintained within the temperature ranges noted in the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP, an organization that sets standard for health care products) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC); Medications and biologicals are stored at their appropriated temperatures and humidity according to the USP guidelines for temperature ranges; The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least one a day; Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents food that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature for two residents (Residents #24 and #45) and residents on the Veranda hall. The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's meal service temperatures policy, revised January 2019, showed: -Purpose: to ensure appropriate food temperatures during meal service and to ensure appropriate food holding temperatures. To comply with federal and state regulations governing food meal service; -Policy: meals temperatures shall be monitored by the dietary manager and the cooks on a daily basis. Hot food shall be cooked or heated to a temperature above 165 degrees. Cold food shall be chilled to a temperature below 40 degrees. 1. Review of Resident #24's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/21/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses included manic depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow hair restraint policies while preparing food, keep the kitchen equipment clean and floors free of trash and grime. This had the potential to affect all residents who eat from the facility kitchen. The census was 67. Review of the facility's food service policy, undated, showed: -The facility follows proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. Safe food handling for the prevention of foodborne illnesses begins when food is received from the vendor and continues throughout the facility's food handling processes; -Dietary staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food. Review of the facility's dietary cleaning schedule, undated, showed: -Items to be cleaned: walk in refrigerator are to be swept and mopped, the fryer is to be cleaned inside and out. 1. Observation on 8/26/24 at 10:10 A.M., 8/27/24 at 8:38 A.M., and 8/29/24 at 6:38 A.M. of the kitchen, showed: -The deep fryer had sticky liquid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with central lines to include dialysis access sites and centrally inserted intravenous (IV) lines, urinary catheters, wounds requiring treatment, and tube feedings administered via a feeding tube surgically inserted into the stomach through the abdomen, for nine of nine residents sampled for EBP (Residents #68, #32, #269, #55, #16, #29, #62, #69, and #5). The facility also failed to follow proper infection control practices during medication administration when staff touched the residents' medications and stuck their fingers into stock medication bottles to dig out medication, for two residents (Residents #269 and #45). In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed routine inspections of bed/side rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify possible areas of entrapment to reduce the risk of accidents for four residents (Residents #55, #32, #47, and #50). The facility identified 47 residents with side rails in use. The census was 67. Review of the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) guidance, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/06, showed: -It is suggested that facilities and manufacturers determine the level of risk for entrapment and take steps to mitigate the risk. Evaluating the dimensional limits of the gaps in hospital beds is one component of an overall assessment and mitigation strategy to reduce entrapment; -The population most vulnerable to entrapment are elderly patients and residents, especially those who are frail, confused, restless, or who have uncontrolled body movement; -Bed rails (commonly used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's pest control program was effective in preventing roaches, which affected eight of 17 sampled residents (Residents #45, #27, #2, #46, #43, #168, #34 and #67). The census was 67. Review of the facility's pest control policy, revised 4/22/23, showed: -Parkwood has a contract with CES Pest Control Company. CES will come out every 2 weeks to spray for bugs and use traps for both bugs and other pests. If additional spraying is needed Parkwood will call CES to come out and spray. A log book is in the front office for CES to sign whenever staff indicates a certain area needs attention for spraying. Any staff member can write a request in the log book for CES to spray or put down traps. If a resident room needs more then the CES spraying Parkwood will move the resident(s) in that room temporarily so that the room can be bug bombed. Clothes will be sent down to laundry and beds and drawers will be cleaned. 1. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when staff left medication in one resident's room, who did not have a physician order for self-administration or medications to be left at the bedside (Resident #27). The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 6/1/18, showed: -Purpose: To administer oral medication in a safe, accurate, and effective manner; -Procedure: Administer medication and remain with the resident while medication is swallowed; Do not leave medications at bedside, unless specifically ordered by the prescriber. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/20/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Required maximum assistance from staff for oral hygiene, toileting, personal hygiene, bathing and upper and lower body dressing; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, anemia (low levels of iron in the blood) and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment was coded accurately to include a life expectancy of less than 6 months for all residents on hospice for one of one resident investigated for hospice (Resident #24). The census was 67. Review of Resident #24's medical record, showed the resident admitted to hospice on 5/10/24. Review of the resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 5/21/24, showed: -Received hospice care; -Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months: No. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:00 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said she does not indicate a life expectancy of less than 6 months just because a resident is on hospice. It is only marked if the resident is actively dying. She was not aware that any resident admitted into hospice has a certification of terminal illness certifying a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid with the appropriate state-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for one of eight residents investigated for the preadmission screening. Of those eight, only one indicated a level II screening was required and the level II assessment for the resident was not completed (Resident #5). The census was 67. Review of Resident #5's medical record, showed: -The resident resided in a Medicaid certified bed; -A DA-124c form, dated 2/29/07, showed: -Section B: Level 1 screening criteria for serious mental illness; -Question #4: Has the person had serious problems in levels of functioning in the past 6 months: Yes; -This completes the level 1 screening. If you checked yes in #4 or #5 in section B, a level II screening is indicated for serious mental illness; -No documentation of a level II screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of three of 17 sampled residents (Residents #9, #45, and #2). The census was 67. Review of the facility's Care Planning Policy and Procedure, dated 1/17/20, showed: -Objective: The facility's standard is to perform quality of care that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices; -A care plan will be developed upon admission. It will be update quarterly, and annual to ensure that there is a continuity of care and is in accordance with the individual's needs. Care plan will also be updated with a significant change of condition; -The care plan must be based upon the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards. Staff failed to follow physician orders and apply a Tubi grip (elastic tubular dressing that reduces swelling) to one resident's lower extremity (Resident #2), who has a medical history of chronic (long term) edema (swelling) and cellulitis (infection of the skin and tissue below the skin) and apply a dressing to one resident's (Resident #269) gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube that is surgically inserted into the abdomen and used for liquid nutrition and medications) site. The sample was 17. The census is 67. Review of the facility's physician order policy revised, 6/21/20, showed: -Policy: To transcribe and follow-physician orders accurately; -Procedure: Orders received by the physician are to be followed as prescribed. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/23/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, identified by the facility as dependent with mobility and high risk for development of pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction) was routinely turned and repositioned by staff. The resident developed a new pressure ulcer to his/her coccyx (tailbone area) and upon identification of the pressure ulcer, staff failed to report it to the nurse, in accordance with the facility's policy (Resident #32). The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure for Skin Protocol, dated 1/5/24, showed: -In order to prevent skin breakdown and promote the health of our residents, it is the policy of the facility to perform skin assessments on a weekly basis. Skin assessments are to be performed by a registered or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN); -Procedure: The LPN or Registered Nurse (RN) are to visually inspect all areas of the body and note/document any abnormalities. If any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received tube feeding in accordance with physician orders to support adequate nutritional intake (Resident #32). The facility identified eight residents receiving tube feedings, three of which were sampled and problems were found with one. The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Specific Medication Administration procedures policy, dated 6/1/18, showed: -Guidance for staff to administer medications via feeding tube; -No any other guidance for staff related to the technical aspects of feeding tubes, including verification of functionality and feeding tube care. Review of Resident #32's medical record, showed diagnoses included dysphagia (swallowing disorder), heart failure and dementia. Review of the resident's electronic Physician Order Sheet (ePOS), showed: -An order, dated 6/24/24, to turn off tube feeding at 8:00 A.M.; -An order, dated 6/30/24, for Jevity 1.5 cal (calorie-dense tube feeding formula) oral liquid, 65 milliliters (ml), gastrostomy tube (g-tube, tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure side rails were accurately assessed as a necessary device prior to installation and use. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the use of side rails and to document side rail use on care plans for four residents (Residents #32, #55, #47 and #50). The facility identified 47 residents with side rails in use. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Restraints/Side Rails policy, dated 4/28/17, showed: -Restraint Evaluation and Utilization Guideline: -The facility does not typically utilize restraints, however if a restraint is utilized to treat a resident's medical symptoms, to prevent injury and promote the highest practicable level of independence, careful evaluation will precede this decision; -The least restrictive device will be used; -The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will discuss the predisposing factors that resulted in the conclusion that restraint evaluation and utilization may be needed; -The need for the use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received nectar-thick liquids (Resident #269) and one resident received a mechanical-soft diet (Resident #32) in accordance with physician orders. The sample was 17. The census was 67. 1. Review of Resident #269's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/9/24, showed: -Diagnoses of acute respiratory failure and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); -Moderately impaired cognition. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS), showed an order, dated 7/9/24, for nectar thickened liquids. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the survey, showed: -Problem: resident receives a mechanical soft diet with nectar thickened liquids; -Goal: utilize interventions to help maintain weight and skin integrity; -Interventions: monitor oral intake of food and fluid, allow eating at own pace. Review of the resident's dietary order and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 42 opportunities, 5 errors occurred, resulting in an 11.9% error rate (Residents #3 and #4). The census was 67. Review of the facility's Medication policy dated, June 1, 2018, showed: -ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES FOR ALL MEDICATIONS; -Policy: To administer medications in a safe and effective manner; -Procedures: Review 5 Rights (3) times: -Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer; -Check MAR for order. -Check the label against the order on the medication administration record (MAR); -After administration, return to cart, replace medication container (if multi-dose and doses remain), and document administration in the MAR or treatment administration record (TAR), and controlled substance sign out record, if indicated; -If resident refuses medication, document refusal on MAR or TAR. Research refusals for possibility of dry mouth, resident reluctance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to do neurological checks (neuro-checks, an assessment completed by nursing staff to monitor for changes in the resident's neurological (nervous system) status) per the facility's policy for one of three residents sampled for falls (Resident #3). The sample was six. The census was 70. Review of the facility's Fall Management Guidelines Policy, dated 10/20/21, showed: -Following a resident's fall: the licensed nurse assesses the resident for injuries (including neuro checks if indicated) and provides necessary treatment; the physician and resident's representative are notified; appropriate interventions are implemented; continue ongoing assessment and documentation by licensed nurses per practice; the licensed nurse documents occurrence on the 24-hour nursing summary; -Procedure: Objective: record the resident's current vital signs, response to neurological assessment, current labs if applicable, identify any pertinent disease or diagnosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents had sufficient medication available to administer as ordered. The facility also failed to notify the residents' physician when their medications were not available for administration (Residents #103, #101 and #106). The sample was seven. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Medication Orders Policy, dated 6/1/18, showed: -Before a controlled drug (drugs, medications, substances, and certain chemicals whose use and distribution are tightly controlled because of their abuse potential or risk) can be dispensed, the pharmacy must be in receipt of a valid prescription with all Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) required elements from a person lawfully authorized to prescribe. A chart is not equivalent to a prescription for a controlled drug. Therefore, the prescriber issuing the chart order must also provide the pharmacist with a valid prescription to ensure delivery of medication; -A valid hard copy prescription must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-21 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) meetings consisted of the required committee members when the medical director failed to attend the facility's QAPI meetings. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Roles and Responsibilities of QAPI policy, undated, showed: -QAPI meets monthly the third week of the month to establish QAPI projects and all personnel involved in QAPI projects. Purpose of meeting is to establish roles and responsibilities of educators and trainers on how quality assurance project will be established and performed for all members of the QAPI team; -QAPI team consists of nursing, housekeeping, maintenance, activities, social services, dietary, management, and administrative staff; -The policy does not differentiate between QAPI meetings and quality assurance (QA) meetings, and does identify the Medical Director or her designee as a required member of the QA committee. Review of the facility's QAPI and QA sign-in sheets for the last 12 months, reviewed 4/20/23, showed the Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity when the Director of Nursing (DON) confronted a resident in the hall in front of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) F, raised her voice, and talked disrespectfully to them. CNA F was later observed to talk disrespectfully to the same resident during a different interaction (Resident #1). In addition, staff entered Resident #37's room to make personal phone calls and FaceTimed (video called) when in the hall during a fire alarm, where residents could potentially be seen by the other person on the phone. The census was 92. Review of the Resident Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed residents had the following resident rights: -The right to be treated with respect and dignity; -The right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, by not ensuring privacy curtains, air conditioning (AC) units, walls, floors, handrails, shared showers, shared bathrooms and equipment were clean. The sample was 19. The census was 92. Review of the Housekeeping Disinfecting Cleaning Schedule, revised 2/24/23, showed: -Housekeeping staff is responsible for the cleaning and disinfection of residents' room. Staff have responsibilities that are scheduled on a daily, weekly and monthly basis; -Housekeepers are responsible for every resident room on their halls, which includes Suites, Gardens and Terrace; -Cleaning consists of: -Pull all trash in the rooms and bathrooms; -Disinfects bathrooms, toilets, rails; -Wipe sink and clean mirrors with Spic and Span; -If nursing staff has to change sheets, make sure the bed is disinfected with chemicals depending if the room is a deep clean or vacant room, make sure bed is made; -Sweep rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-21 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit resident Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, in a timely manner for 3 of 3 months reviewed. The census was 92. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument manual, version 1.18.11 dated October 2023, showed: -All Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes and swing beds, or agents of those facilities, must transmit required MDS data records to CMS' Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System; -Transmitting Data: Providers must transmit all sections of the MDS 3.0 required for their State-specific instrument and all tracking or correction information; -The manual includes a submission timeframe table for MDS record types. Review of the facility's CMS submission, MDS final validation report, dated 1/26/23, showed: -20 records in submission file; -9 records submitted late. Review of the facility's CMS submission, MDS final validation report, dated 2/13/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, for three of three narcotic books reviewed. The census was 92. Review of the facility's Narcotic Count Change of Shift policy, dated 1/4/23, showed: -Narcotics must be counted with the nurse/certified medication technician (CMT) at the change of shift; -The nurse/CMT must count the total number of cards/packages and note the total on the count sheet; -Each card/package must be counted to ensure that the total number of narcotics is accurate and matches the total number of narcotics in the card/package; -The nurse arriving for their shift and leaving their shift must initial the change of shift count sheet; -If any discrepancies are noted at change of shift nurse/CMT is to notify the Director of Nursing (DON) or nurse management immediately. 1. Review of the April 2023 CMT narcotic book, for Terrace C & D hall, reviewed on 4/19/23 at 8:22 A.M., showed: -15 of 37 shifts with no oncoming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control protocols and universal standards when a staff member used a plunger to clear a clogged sink, did not disinfect the sink and used it to wet a towel which they then used to provide perineal care for two residents. Staff did not adequately wash their hands (Resident #50 and Resident #13). Another staff member cross-contaminated when he/she wore soiled gloves and took soiled items in a resident's room for one resident (Resident #62) and dragged soiled trash bags on the floor. Staff also failed to perform proper hand hygiene when providing care. Staff failed to sanitize shared equipment, such as blood pressure cuffs, between residents. Additionally, staff improperly cleaned a blood sugar finger stick (BSFS) machine with an alcohol wipe. The sample was 19. The census was 92. Review of the facility's undated Hand-Washing: Do's and don'ts policy, showed: -Hand-washing is an easy way to prevent infection. Understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing standards of practice related to enteral tube (a tube that is inserted directly into the stomach to provide food, fluid, and medication) medication administration for one resident (Resident #81). The facility failed to remove an order for a wanderguard (an electronic monitoring device used to keep residents at risk for elopement safe) and nursing staff continued to document the device as checked twice a day when the resident did not wear the device (Resident #6). The sample was 19. The census was 92. 1. Review of the facility's Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated 6/1/18, showed the following procedures for enteral tube. Types of enteral tubes include the gastric tube, (g-tube) medication administration: -The facility assures the safe and effective administration of enteral formulas and medications via enteral tubes. Selection of enteral formulas, routes and methods of administration, and the decision to administer medications via enteral tubes are based on nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities to meet the interests and well-being of Resident #37 by failing to assist the resident from bed to wheelchair and to the activity location (Resident #37). The resident sample was 18. The census was 92. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/22/23, showed: -admission date of 9/6/22; -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses of hypertension and major depressive disorder. Review of the Resident's Care Plan, dated 3/31/23, showed: -Care Area: Resident requires extensive to total assist with ADL's. She is total assist with Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) with two staff for transfers and maximum assist with grooming, toileting, positioning, and bathing; -The resident was not care planned for assistance to activities. Record review of the Resident's one on one activities charting log for April 2023, showed that he/she should regularly be checked on in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #67). The resident had orders for daily wound care for three wounds, which was not completed for three days. Staff charted wound care was completed, although the dressings showed they were not by the date on indicated on the dressings and confirmed by the wound nurse. The sample was 19. The census was 92. Review of Resident #67's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/19/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Resident is at risk of developing pressure ulcers: Yes -Resident has unstageable pressure ulcers: Yes, 1; -Resident has diabetic foot ulcers: Yes, 1 -Diagnoses included diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and manic depression. -Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/24/23, showed: -Problem: Skin breakdown: Open area to bilateral ankles. At risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the proper care necessary to maintain good personal hygiene and to prevent infection and odor for one of three residents observed (Resident #62). The census was 92. Review of the facility's Peri-Care (perineal care, cleansing of the surface area between the thighs, extending from the pubic bone to the tail bone) policy, dated January 25, 2017, showed: -Purpose: To cleanse the perineum. To prevent infection and odor; -Cleansing resident from front to back thoroughly cleaning right and left genitals rotating disposable wipe between each wipe; -Wipe the peri rectal area from front to back using a disposable wipe; -Wipe the buttocks from the center of the body to the outside of the body with a disposable wipe; -Repeat process until disposable wipe is free of soiling and discard. Review of Resident #62 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/29/22, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Requires extensive staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility employed non-certified Nurse Aides (NAs) for more than 4 months without them becoming certified. Observation of personal care provided to a resident by one of the NAs, showed the NA was not competent to provide care consistent with acceptable nursing practices or following proper infection control practices (Resident #62). Two NAs were identified to work more than 4 months without becoming certified. The census was 92. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/22/22, showed: -Average daily census 71-81; -Resident support/care needs included: Activities of daily living, mobility and fall preventions, bowel and bladder, and skin integrity; -Facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for our resident population every day and during emergencies, included: Nursing services (e.g., Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), medication aide or technician, and Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse; -Facility resources did not address the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible when a closet door fell and hit a resident (Resident #76). In addition, the facility left potentially harmful treatment supplies accessible to residents in a resident room (Resident #28) and in a small storage area on one unit. This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The census was 90. Review of the facility's Accidents Policy, dated 10/15/19, showed: -The health and safety of each resident is of the upmost importance at the facility. In order to obtain and maintain the highest level of health and safety for its residents, the facility will ensure: -The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; -Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents; -The facility is committed to developing a culture of safety and implementing systems that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs by failing to complete a gradual dose reduction (GDR) as indicated for one resident of eight residents investigated for unnecessary psychotropic medications(Resident #43). The sample size was 18. The census was 90. Review of Resident #43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/28/19, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Required no assistance by staff for activities of daily living (ADLs); -Wheelchair/walker for mobility; -Medications included: -Antipsychotics, 7 days a week; -Antidepressants, 7 days a week; -Diagnoses included dementia, seizure disorder, depression, and diabetes. Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), dated 1/1/20 through 1/31/20, showed: -An order, dated 7/13/19, for Effexor XR (antidepressant, generic name of Venlafaxine HCL) 75 milligram (mg) capsule, 1 capsule every evening; -An order, dated 7/13/19, Effexor XR 150 mg capsule,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff protected food from contamination by not ensuring drinks were covered while serving residents in the dining room. This had the potential to affect all residents in who dined in the facility. The census was 90. Observation of the resident dining room, showed: -On 1/21/20 at 5:27 P.M., staff pushed a two tiered serving cart through the dining room beside seated residents. Approximately 20 drinks, sat on the bottom tier of the cart and were uncovered; -On 1/22/20 8:39 A.M., dietary staff pushed a two tiered serving cart through the dining room, beside seated residents. A tray on top of the cart filled with orange juice and milk, sat uncovered; -On 1/23/20 at 12:15 A.M., dietary staff pushed a two tiered serving cart, passing drinks in the dining room, beside seated residents, all of the drinks on both tiers were uncovered; -On 1/23/20 12:44 P.M, 20 cups of pink drinks, uncovered, sat on top of a two tiered serving cart next to the handwashing sink, while staff were observed washing their hands. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for one resident's missing a coat. Staff failed to investigate the missing coat, failed to ensure management was made aware of the missing coat and sent the resident out in the community wrapped in a blanket in place of a coat, for one of 18 sampled residents (Residents #76). The census was 90. Review of the facility's Resident Protection Investigation Paths, dated 12/14/18, showed: -Determine whether a missing item is theft: All missing items need to be investigated in accordance with the facility's missing item protocol. However, the loss of an item in and of itself does not constitute theft. The theft of socks, underwear, housecoats, glasses, hearing aids or dentures is very unlikely, despite the initial concerns of an upset resident or family member; -A confused resident taking another resident's property is not misappropriation of resident property because it is not deliberate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to self-administer medication only if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate, for two residents found to have medications left at the bedside for self-administration (Residents #139 and #49). The census was 90. Review of the facility's undated Self-Administration of Medication policy, showed: -Policy statement: For administration of medications by a resident the individuals must be deemed competent for self-administration prior to the physician or authorized prescriber ordering the medication via a self-administration assessment. This assessment will be completed initially upon request to self-administer, quarterly and upon change of condition from baseline to ensure continued safe-administration; -Specific medication orders are written by the physician or authorized prescriber, for self-administration by the resident, including the medication, dose, frequency, route, indication, and whether the medication is to be stored at bedside;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile bank statements for 5 of 12 months reviewed. The census was 90. 1. Record review of the facility's resident trust statements, showed the following: -July 2019: Bank statement ending balance, showed an amount of $53,821.63; -The facility monthly reconciliation form, showed an ending balance amount of $39,925.76; -Neither amounts matched the resident ledger; -August 2019: Bank statement ending balance, showed an amount of $67,375.75; -The facility monthly reconciliation form, showed an ending balance amount of $58,971.54; -Neither amounts matched the resident ledger; -September 2019: Bank statement ending balance, showed an amount $51,480.65; -The facility monthly reconciliation form, showed an ending balance amount of $47,102.91; -Neither amounts matched the resident ledger; -October 2019: Bank statement ending balance, showed an amount of $42,783.15; -The facility monthly reconciliation form, showed an ending balance amount of $43,249.57; -Neither amounts matched the resident ledger; -November 2019:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident or their legal representative of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital, for three residents who were recently transferred to the hospital for various medical reasons (Residents #64, #139, and #32). The sample was 18. The census was 90. Review of the facility's undated transfer and discharge policy, showed when a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, a discharge letter is sent with the resident. The letter will indicate the name of the resident with the date, the reason for the discharge and the location to where the resident is sent. The social service department will keep a copy of the letter in the binder and at the first of the following month the list of all the residents will be faxed to the ombudsman. Any resident that is given an emergency discharge letter, will have the letter faxed to the ombudsman on the same day. Any 30 day discharge letter that is given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility meet professional standards of practice by failing to ensure all physician orders were followed when staff failed to obtain a daily blood pressure prior to administration of a blood pressure medication and/or administered blood pressure medication when the results were outside normal parameters, for one resident (Resident #42). The sample size was 18. The census was 90. Review of Resident #42's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/25/19, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses includes atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), coronary artery disease (heart disease), heart failure, hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and stroke. Review of the resident's physician orders sheet (POS), dated 1/1/20 through 1/31/20, showed: -An order, dated 9/26/19, for Clonidine (medication to treat high blood pressure), 1 milligram (mg) tablet, administer 0.5 mg twice a day for high blood pressure; -An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to provide showers and nail care for one resident who was dependent on staff for care needs (Resident #12). The sample was 18. The census was 90. Review of the facility's shower policy, revised 1/2017, showed: -Purpose: To provide showers on a bi-weekly basis; -A shower schedule will be maintained at each nurse's station for each division reflecting days and shift for each room/bed shower to be completed. Accommodations for requested days of the week or times will be made; -Residents right to refuse showers will be respected and addressed via the plan of care; -Refusals will be communicated to the responsible party if applicable, social service will be advised and the primary care physician and psychiatric consultant may be notified if indicated for repetitive refusals; -Nails are to be assessed trimmed and cleaned as needed; -Shaving is to be performed as needed; -Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to address an observed skin irritation and bleeding for one resident. The staff also failed to notify the resident's physician and family and failed to document the observation and report the findings to oncoming nursing shifts (Resident #28). The sample was 18. The census was 90. Review of the facility's skin assessment policy, dated 8/17/17, showed: -In order to prevent skin breakdown and promote the health of the residents, it is the policy to perform skin assessments on a weekly basis. Skin assessments are to be performed by a registered nurse (RN) or licensed practical nurse (LPN); -Procedure: The LPN or RN are to visually inspect all areas of the body and note/document any abnormalities. If any abnormalities are found, the LPN or RN performing the skin assessment is to notify the physician, resident and/or resident representative and Director of Nursing (DON); -Residents may develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receives appropriate treatment and services for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for one resident. The facility identified three residents as having an indwelling urinary catheter, two were included in the sample of 18 and issues were identified with one resident (Resident #8). The census was 90. Review of the facility's undated Catheter Care policy, showed: -Purpose: To monitor the necessity of urinary catheters and to maintain the patency of these catheters; -Procedure: Document the involvement of the resident/representative in the discussion of the risks and benefits of the use of a catheter, removal of the catheter when criteria or indication for use is no longer present, how long use is anticipated, and the right to decline the use of the catheter; -Write an order on the physician's order sheet for the catheter with the reason for the catheter. Must have acceptable diagnosis for use; -Maintain catheter tubing below bladder level,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis (process of filtering toxins from the blood for individuals with kidney failure) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow the facility policy and provide ongoing communication with the dialysis center for two residents. The facility identified five residents as receiving dialysis. Of those five, three were included in the sampled of 18 and issues were identified with two (Residents #76 and #64). The census was 90. Review of the facility's Dialysis Policy, dated 9/1/19, showed: -It is the standard at the facility to meet the health care needs of its residents. As such, the facility will ensure that residents who require dialysis will receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences; -Professional standards of practice include: -Ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of significant medication errors, for one resident when the facility staff administered the wrong dose of insulin (Resident #84). The census was 90. Review of the facilities Specific Medication Administration Procedure, Administration procedure for all Medications policy, dated 6/1/18, showed: -Policy: to administer medications in a safe and effective manner; Procedure: Review five rights three times: Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer; check the medication/treatment administration record for order; check for vital signs, other tests to be done during/prior to medication administration; Prepare resident for medication; Prior to removing the medication from the container, check the label against the order on the medication administration record; note any supplemental labeling that applies; obtain and record any vital or other monitoring parameters ordered or deemed necessary prior to medication administration; after administration, return to cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance to current acceptable professional standards for two of five observed nurse medication carts, one of two observed nurse treatment carts and one of three observed medication rooms. The census was 90. Review of the facility's Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy policy, dated 6/1/18, showed: -Policy: Medications are labeled in accordance with the facility requirements and state and federal laws. Only the dispensing pharmacy/registered pharmacist can modify, change, or attach prescription labels; -Procedures: Labels are permanently affixed to the outside of the prescription container. No medication is accepted with the label inserted into a vial. If a label does not fit directly onto the product, e.g. eye drops, the label may be affixed to an outside container or carton, but the resident's name, at least must be maintained directly on the actual product container; -Each prescription medication label should include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered STAT (immediate) laboratory testing had been obtained and results received in a timely manner for one resident and failed to obtain a laboratory test for one additional resident (Resident's #38 and #52). The sample was 18. The census was 90. 1. Review of Resident #38's care plan, updated 11/15/19, showed: -Problem: Occasionally incontinent; -Goal: Measures will be taken to prevent skin breakdown; -Interventions: Staff to assist to change incontinence pad as soon as possible after voiding, provide daily skin inspections, keep the skin clean, dry and free of irritants. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/16/19, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Felt depressed two to six days; -No behaviors; -Limited staff assistance needed with toileting and hygiene; -Frequent urinary incontinence; -Diagnoses of depression and stroke.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for three residents with missing behavior documentation, sleep disturbance documentation and/or non-phrenological interventions implemented, and had improperly documented diagnoses (Residents #42, #32 and #38). The sample was 18. The census was 90. 1. Review of the Resident #42's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/25/19, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Diagnoses includes coronary artery disease, heart failure, high blood pressure, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, acid reflux), pneumonia, diabetes, hyperlipidemia (high level of lipids), stroke, dementia, anxiety, depression, asthma, and respiratory failure; -No behaviors; -Antipsychotics, antidepressant, and antianxiety medications administered in the last seven days; -Hypnotics administered in the last four days; -Gradual dose reduction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and effective infection prevention and control program by failing to follow the facility's transmission based precaution policy for one resident on isolation (Resident #288). The sample was 18. The census was 90. Review of the facility's Transmission Based Precautions Isolation Precautions policy, dated 11/7/17, showed: -This policy outlines the precautions required to prevent transmission of infectious agents. Standard precautions are to be followed at all times. Additionally, transmission-based precautions may be required on a case by case basis and will be determined by the Director of Nursing (DON); -Transmission-Based Precautions include standard precautions, and are divided into three categories: Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions and Airborne Precautions; -Suspected and or positive for Clostridium difficile (c-diff., a bacteria that causes diarrhea): -A sign must be placed on the room door to not enter until speaking with the nurse; -The resident is placed on Contact Isolation, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, unless documentation showed the vaccine was medically contraindicated, refused or the resident was already immunized by failing to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to three residents (Residents #18, #28, and #8) out of five residents sampled for the pneumococcal vaccine. The resident sample was 18. The facility census was 90. 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record, showed the following information: -admission date of 10/12/17; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, stroke, seizure disorder, and depression; -No documentation in the medical record or electronic medical record that the pneumococcal vaccine was offered or received. 2. Review of Resident #28's medical record, showed the following information: -admission date of 7/23/13; -Diagnosis included high blood pressure, seizure disorder, and anxiety disorder; -No documentation in the medical record or electronic medical record that the pneumococcal vaccine was offered or received.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-08-29 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have the most recent annual survey's plan of correction and statements of deficiencies with the corresponding plans of correction completed for any abbreviated survey completed since the most recent annual survey, available to residents and visitors at all times without them having to be requested. The sample was 17. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights, provided to residents upon admission, showed the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility; and receive information from agencies acting as client advocates, and to be afforded the opportunity to contact these agencies. Review of a sign posted near the main entrance, reviewed on 8/27/24 at 7:41 A.M., showed: -State inspection survey located at the reception desk; -Available Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM through 5:00 PM; -Survey results located at the entrance to the suites during all hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-04-21 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, per shift on a daily basis. The census was 92. Observation on 9/19/23 at 11:50 A.M., showed no postings of nurse staffing information available throughout the facility. During an interview on 9/19/23 at 11:56 A.M., the staffing coordinator said that she is responsible for posting nurse staffing information. She said she does not regularly post it and does not remember the last time she did. During an interview on 4/20/23 at 9:22 A.M. the administrator said he would expect the staffing coordinator to post staffing information.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RILEY SPENCE SENIOR LIVING — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RILEY, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 01/01/2007 |
| SPENCE, GREGORY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2007 |
| RILEY SPENCE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/13/2025 |
| CAUWENBERGH, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/17/2018 |
| ROSENBERG, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265523. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.