Foxwood Springs Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 217 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 141 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect one sampled resident (Resident #3) out of 10 sampled residents from intimidation and physical abuse. On 1/25/24 at about 10:00 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) A, CNA B, and CNA C forcibly made the resident shower. The resident said no and struck out at staff. The resident reported having a fear of water and doesn't like water on his/her face. The resident was visibly tearful and upset while recounting the event. The resident had a thumb size dark purple bruise with a green ring around it on the back of his/her right upper arm, thumb size dark purple bruise on the left lower arm below the elbow, and finger size dark purple bruise on the right upper outer arm. The facility had 87 residents. On 2/5/24 at 2:35 P.M., the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance immediate jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on 1/25/24. On 1/30/24, facility administration was notified of the incident, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order for a narcotic medication was accurately shown on the narcotic sheet and Medication Administration Record (MAR); failed to ensure the nurse accurately documented narcotic medications administered on the MAR; and failed to ensure the policy and procedure for corrections made on the narcotic sheet were followed for one sampled resident (Resident #4) out of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 92 residents. Review of the facility's Administering Oral Medication policy and procedure dated October 2010, showed the purpose was to provide guidelines for safe administration of oral medications. The policy showed the staff should:-Verify that there is a physician's order for the medication.-Place the MAR within easy viewing distance.-Unlock the medication cart and select the drug from the unit dose drawer.-Check the label on the medication and confirm the medication name and dose with the MAR.-Check the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to clean the kitchen floors, preparation table, shelves and drawers, stove, the grill, grill area, ovens, sides and front of the deep fat fryer, refrigerators, and the steamer/convection ovens. Findings include: Review of the undated Sanitization policy read in part: Policy Statement - The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and implementation - 1. All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean . 2. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning . 3. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee with the participation of the Medical Director and Infection Control Preventionist (or designee) for three (3) out of six (6) quarterly meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement policy, dated 3/15/24, noted, Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 5 . The following individuals serve on the committee: Administrator, or designee who is in a leadership role; Director of Nursing Services; Medical Director; Infection Preventionist . Review of QAPI committee meeting attendance sheets revealed all required committee members signed the attendance sheets for meetings held on 9/21/23, 3/21/24, and 6/20/24. On 12/21/23, the signature of the Medical Director was not present on the sign-in sheet for this quarterly meeting. On 9/19/24, the signature of the Infection Control Preventionist was not present on the sign-in sheet for this quarterly meeting. On 12/19/24, the signatures for both the Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's cleaning checklist, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment in a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike manner on 200 Hall for two (2) residents who resided on this hall (Resident #48 and Resident #53), and failed to maintain in a safe, clean manner a lounge area and ice machine shared by residents from both 100 and 200 Halls. The combined census on the 100 and 200 Halls on 1/7/25, the first day of the survey, was 45. Findings include: During the initial tour of 200 Hall on 1/7/25, beginning at 12:55 p.m., observation found the carpeting on the hall was not clean, with small pieces of paper trash, small fragments of gauze, and debris noted throughout the length of the hallway from one (1) end of the residential corridor to the other. The carpeting on this hall was found to be in the same state when observed throughout the rest of the afternoon on 1/7/25 and throughout the day on 1/8/25. An observation was made of Resident #48's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards. Staff failed to secure the contents of an unattended treatment cart stored in a lounge used by residents on the 100 and 200 Halls. The cart contained medicated creams, ointments, and topical sprays, as well as bandage scissors. The unlocked treatment cart presented a potential hazard to all residents residing on 100 and 200 Halls. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Security of Medication Cart, revised April 2007, noted: Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. On 1/7/25 at 12:41 p.m., the surveyor observed an unlocked treatment cart in which were stored band aids, bandages, gauze, gauze tape, lidocaine pain spray, medicated ointments and creams, and bandage scissors. The cart was stored in an open lounge area, and multiple residents were observed to be within six (6) feet of the treatment cart. In an interview on 1/7/25 at 12:42 p.m., Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was not determined by a physician to lack the ability to make informed healthcare decisions, was provided with opportunities to make decisions in their best interest for the Care Plan process. This was evidenced by one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for participation in the Care Plan process (Resident #64). Findings include: Review of the facility's Advance Directives policy with a revision date of December 2016 revealed: Policy Statement - Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 3. If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to the resident's legal representative. 4. If the resident becomes able to receive and understand this information later, he or she will be provided with the same written materials as described above,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage were acknowledged by the resident. This was evidenced for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (Resident #64). Findings include: Review of Resident #64's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for Health Care Decisions documents revealed, I appoint the person named below to be my agent to make health care decisions for me when and only when I cannot make decisions or communicate what I want done. Review of Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine (9), which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. In an interview on 1/10/25 at 4:25 p.m., Social Worker #1 stated that Resident #64 was not notified of the determination of non-coverage, because the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan after a significant change in the status/condition of a resident. This was evidenced by Resident #10 having had an unwitnessed fall with major injury resulting in a right hip replacement and pubic bone fracture on 7/24/24. The Care Plan was not revised within seven (7) days to ensure timeliness of a person-centered comprehensive assessment to address the resident's needs for one (1) of one (1) resident sampled for Comprehensive Care Plan timeliness (Resident #10). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a revision date of March 2022, noted: Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission. Review of Resident #10's face sheet documented an admission date of 2/1/21. Medical diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party to obtain consent prior to starting a new medication for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 88 residents. The Director of Nurses (DON) and the Administrator were notified on 7/9/24 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 5/10/24. All nursing staff were in-serviced on notification of responsible parties on 6/21/24. The deficiency was corrected on 6/21/24. Review of the facility's policy titled Charting and Documentation dated July 2017 showed: -Any changes in the resident's condition shall be documented in the resident's medical record. -Documentation should include notification of the family. 1. Review of Resident #2's undated admission record showed the resident had a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by memory problems, impaired reasoning, and personality changes). Review of the resident's care plan dated 2/10/23 showed: -The resident had dementia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfer assistance for one sampled resident (Resident #3). On 1/25/24 the resident was transferred by four staff from his/her wheelchair to a shower chair without the use of a gait belt, while the resident physically resisted. Staff grabbed the resident by his/her arms and lifted him/her up from the wheelchair, resulting in bruising on the back of his/her right upper arm, left lower arm below the elbow, and on the right upper outer arm. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of facility policy Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised 7/2017, showed: -In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility used appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents. -Residents safety would be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. -Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, would have assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BONCREST RESOURCE GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO