No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Seneca Place

5360 Saltsburg Road, Verona, PA 15147 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 174 certified beds · (412) 798-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (412) 798-8000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5769 Saltsburg Rd · (412) 793-8870 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5745 Saltsburg Rd · (412) 243-1369 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10991 Frankstown Rd · (412) 241-4144 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
120 Gernert Dr · (412) 795-1133

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.6%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.5%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.991.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.591.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.0%CMS range 37.8–55.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.9–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.3–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.91
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
43.8%
Total nursing turnover
38.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 153.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-26)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

73 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide bodily privacy during treatment procedures for one of six residents (Resident R10) and failed to maintain the dignity of two of six residents reviewed (Resident R43) who had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and (Resident 185) who had an urinary condom catheter (non-invasive external urinary catheter worn like a condom it collects urine as it drains from the bladder and sends it to a collection bag).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dignity dated 5/21/26, indicated demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents; for example: helping the resident to keep urinary catheter bags covered. Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders for management of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for one of two residents (Resident R173) failed to obtain physician orders for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) for one of two residents (Resident R15) failed to notify a physician's of a resident with a hypoglycemic episode (low blood sugar) for one of two residents (Resident R173) and failed to obtain orders for a urinary condom catheter (non-invasive external urinary catheter worn like a condom it collects urine as it drains from the bladder and sends it to a collection bag) for one of three residents (Resident R185).Findings include: Review of the facility policy External Male Catheter-Condom Catheter last reviewed 5/21/26, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary tract infection and skin breakdown in an incontinent resident. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent and complete communication with the dialysis (treatment that helps body remove extra fluid and waste products) center for three of three residents (Residents R17, R34, and R86), failed to ensure that monitoring of the residents' access site was accurate and completed for two of three residents (Resident R17 and R86). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dialysis Communication Documentation Policy dated 5/21/26, indicated all dialysis-related communication- whether incoming or outgoing- must be documented in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the documents section. Staff receiving dialysis-related communication must document the information in the EMR on the same day it is received. Review of facility policy Hemodialysis Catheters - Access and Care of dated 5/21/26, indicated the nurse should document in the resident's medical record every shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in one of three medication storage rooms (4th Floor Medication Room) and four of five medication carts (2 East Medication Cart, 2 [NAME] Medication Cart, 3 [NAME] Medication Cart, and 4 [NAME] Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Labeling of Medication Containers dated 5/21/26, indicated all medications maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal guidelines and regulations. Labels for individual medications include all necessary information including the expiration date when applicable. Observation completed on 06/22/26, at 12:46 p.m. the 4 [NAME] Medication Cart contained: 1 Fluticasone Propionate inhaler (prevents symptoms of asthma attack) opened and not labeled with a date as required 3 Albuterol inhalers (relaxes airway muscles) opened and not labeled with a date as required 1 bottle of Optase hylo night eye drops (eye lubricant) opened and not labeled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor resident personal refrigerator temperatures for one of two refrigerators (Resident R98) which created the potential for food borne illness, failed to handle and wash facility linens in a safe an aseptic (free from disease-causing microorganisms) manner during an observation of the main laundry room, failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R10), and failed to implement a comprehensive program for water management to monitor the potential development and spread of Legionella within the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Refrigerators and Freezers dated 5/21/26, indicated monthly tracking sheets for all refrigerators and freezers will be posted to record temperatures. Review of the facility policy Departmental (Environmental Services)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine whether it was safe to self-administer medications for one of six residents (Resident R74). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medications dated 5/21/26, indicated facility should comply with policy with respect to resident self-administration of medications. The facility should assess and determine whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality and health condition. Facility should ensure that orders for self-administration list the specific medications the resident may self-administer. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R74's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/21/26, indicated the diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed resident records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's family of behavioral concerns for one of three closed resident records (Closed Resident Record CR194).Findings include: The facility Change in a resident's condition or status policy last reviewed on 5/21/26, indicated that the facility promptly notifies the resident, the attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical/ mental condition and status. A significant change of condition is a major decline in the residents' status. Review of Closed Resident Records CR194's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Records CR194's Minimum Data Set assessment: (MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/5/26, indicated she had diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system which affects movement and includes tremors), chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess the functional status of the individual resident to determine if the use of a bolster (a long, thick cushion) is a restraint for one of four residents (Residents R23).Findings include: Review of facility policy Use of Restraints dated 5/21/26, indicated physical restraints are defined as any method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/25/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and anemia (too little iron in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed resident records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care needs and services for one of five sampled resident records (Closed Resident Records CR194).Findings include: The facility Care plans, comprehensive person centered policy last reviewed 5/21/26, indicated that a person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented. The person-centered care plan reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. Care plans are revised as information about the residents' conditions change. Review of Closed Resident Records CR194's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Records CR194's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/5/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received proper treatment for pressure ulcers for one of five residents (Resident R10).Findings include: Review of facility policy Review of facility policy Charting and Documentation dated 5/21/26, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/20/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, wound infection, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 63 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed and reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for one of five residents (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Regimen Review dated 5/21/26, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. Within twenty-four hours of the MRR, the Consultant Pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident identified as having a non-life threatening medication irregularity. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/9/26, indicated the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical record reviews and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation for a burn for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include:Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/17/26 indicated diagnoses of mood disorder, brain injury without loss of consciousness and dysphagia (trouble moving food or liquids from the mouth to the stomach). Review of documentation provided by the facility dated 2/17/26, stated Resident R2 burned his hands on hot coffee during the 3-11 shift, it caused a red area and blister. On call physician was contacted and recommended Resident R2 be sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment, Resident R2 refused. During an interview 6/2/26 at 1:30 p.m. Dietary Manager Employee E1 stated they do not take temperatures of their coffee or hot water before or during tray line service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed have physician orders for colostomy supplies and care for one of six residents (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm vulva, colostomy and anxiety. A review of Resident R1's a MDS 5-Day assessment (minimum data assessment)- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/6/26, indicated the diagnosis remained current. A review of Resident R1's physician orders dated 5/26/26 indicated:Colostomy Appliance Change Q 7 days and prn- written 5/12/26Conva Tec Natura Plus Pouch Lot #5E013743. 1 1/4- 1 3/4 (33-45mm) [NAME]-Fit-written 5/12/26Colostomy Care-every shift, written 5/12/25 During an interview on 6/2/26, at 2:30 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to write colostomy orders on admission for Resident R1 as required. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment resulting in a burn for one of three residents (Resident R2). Findings include:Review of the clinical record Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/17/26 indicated diagnoses of mood disorder, brain injury without loss of consciousness and dysphagia (trouble moving food or liquids from the mouth to the stomach). Review of documentation provided by the facility dated 2/16/26, stated Resident R2 burned his hands on hot coffee during the 3-11 shift, it caused a red area and blister. Intact Blister on the second finger knuckle to the top of the right hand measuring approximately 2cm x2cm (centimeters). Review of facility provided investigation dated 2/17/26 indicated coffee temperature from the kitchen approximately 172-178 at time of tray set up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for neglect for two of five residents (Resident R5, and R119), and failed to conduct a criminal background check prior to the start of employment for two of five staff ( Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E10, and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E11). Findings include: Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy last reviewed 5/1/25, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident ' s property and exploitation. The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives that include but not inclusive to developing and implementing policies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and investigate an incident of possible abuse and/or neglect for three of five incidents reviewed (Residents R5, R54 and R119). Findings include: The facility Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting policy dated 5/1/25, indicated all accidents or incidents occurring on our premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. Regardless of how minor an accident or incident, injuries of unknown origin, it must be reported to the nursing supervisor and included on the facility 24- hour report. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/1/25, indicated the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure) diabetes (high sugar in the blood) and hyperlipidemia (high fats in the blood). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of six residents (Residents R62, R118, and R292). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 5/1/25, indicated assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R62's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/7/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), high blood pressure, and muscle wasting. Review of a physician progress note dated 3/13/25, stated, Patient seen and evaluated today for diarrhea and vomiting. 2 episodes of diarrhea and 2 episodes of vomiting this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a physician orders for intravenous catheter (IV- a catheter placed into a vein for a medical need of fluids or antibiotics) dressing changes for one of two residents (Resident R56), failed to follow physician orders for wound care for one of five residents (Resident R124), failed to ensure timely follow up physician appointments were ordered for two out of four residents (Residents R2, and R97), and failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with standards of practice and physician orders by failing to label a medicated patch with the date and time prior to application for one of three residents (Resident R133) as required. Findings include: Review or the facility policy Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Change dated 5/1/25, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care relating to CPAP/BIPAP (a continuous positive airway pressure machine used to keep airways open while you sleep/a positive airway pressure machine when breathing in and breathing out) for three of three residents (Residents R19, R50, and R93). Findings include: Review of the facility policy CPAP/Bipap Support dated 1/2/25, indicated Bipap delivers continuous positive airway pressure, but allows separate pressure settings for expiration (EPAP -breathing out) and inspiration (IPAP- breathing in). Document in the resident's medical record how the resident tolerated the procedure. Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the pressure measurement for the machine. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R19 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent and complete communication with the dialysis center for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R4 and R44), failed to have physician orders for access device care and management for two of three residents (Resident R4, and R109) and failed to have appropriate care plans for two of three resident's (Resident R4 and R109). Findings include: Review of the facility policy End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of Resident With dated 5/1/25, indicated the nature and clinical management of ESRD, the care of grafts and fistulas, and agreements between the facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed including how the care plan will be developed and implemented, and how information will be exchanged between facilities. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications and biologicals properly and securely in three of five medications carts (Third floor North Hall, Third floor [NAME] Hall, and Fourth floor East Hall medication carts). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed 5/1/25, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 5/1/25, indicated the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. During an observation on 6/10/25, at 9:00 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two of three residents (Residents R49 and R109), failed to implement appropriate transmission-based precautions for four of five residents (Residents R62, R118, R142, and R143), and failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for two of ten months (September 2024, and February 2025) and failed to prevent cross contamination during a medication pass for one of three resident's (Resident R133). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 5/1/25, indicated EBP's are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) to residents. EBP's are indicated for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician or resident representative of a change in condition/status for three of six residents (Resident R54, R119 and R124). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 5/1/25, indicated the facility promptly notifies the resident, his, or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/12/25, indicated the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus(a chronic metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels), post-traumatic stress disorder and hypotension (medical condition characterized by low blood pressure). Review of Resident R54's progress notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report one of five neglect allegations (Residents R5) to the State Department of Health as required. Findings include: Review of facility Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program last reviewed 5/1/25, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident ' s property and exploitation. The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives that include but not inclusive to developing and implementing policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse or mistreatment and neglect of residents. Conduct employee background checks. Provide staff orientation and training programs that include topics such as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in elopement (resident exited to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) for two of five residents (Resident R54 and R119). Findings include: The facility Wandering and Elopements policy dated 5/1/25, indicated the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R54's MDS dated [DATE], indicated with the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (a chronic metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels), post-traumatic stress disorder and hypotension (medical condition characterized by low blood pressure). Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter as required for one of three residents (Resident R292). Findings include: Review of facility policy Catheter Care, Urinary dated 5/1/25, indicated to review and document the clinical indications for catheter use prior to inserting. Nursing and the interdisciplinary team should assess and document the ongoing need for a catheter that is in place. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R292 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R292's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a period assessment of care needs) dated 5/29/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and muscle weakness. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R292 had a physician's order dated 6/2/25, for an indwelling urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for four of five nursing staff (Employees E15, E16, E17, and E18). Findings include: Review of facility provided document Performance Evaluators Instructions dated 1/1/25, indicated to rate the employee on the observations listed. Check the rating that best describes the employee's performance. List those skills, qualities or habits that have enabled the employee to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job with strength. List areas that have demonstrated the need for attention or improvement. File the original in the personnel file and provide a copy to the employee. Place on the performance evaluation for annual or other. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15's personnel record indicated a hire date of 10/16/95. Review of NA Employee E16's personnel record indicated a hire date of 10/2/17. Review of NA Employee E17's personnel record indicated a hire date of 11/20/23. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food in a form to meet individuals' needs in one of six residents (Resident R13). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R13's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/3/25, indicated diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, cerebral infarction (a condition where a part of the brain is deprived of blood supply, leading to the death of brain tissue) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung diseases that cause long-term breathing problems) . During a review of Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident R13 had a crab allergy. During a review of Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident R13 had a crab allergy. Review of Resident R13 Progress notes dated 5/13/25 indicated while passing 7 p.m. meds , resident called out and stated he has vomited. when assessed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (A binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not). for one of five residents (Resident R11) and failed to ensure an arbitration agreement was signed for one of five residents (Resident R28). Findings include: Review of the facility form arbitration and limitation of liability agreement completed on 6/11/25, indicated this agreement sets forth a dispute resolution procedure by which the parties intend to resolve all disputes which may arise between them concerning the residents stay in the facility. The procedure is intended to be a speedy and economic alternative to court litigation which is often slow, time consuming and expensive. By using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four quarterly meeting (Quarter One of 2025). Findings Include: The facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy dated 5/1/25, indicated that the facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, date-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Review of Quality assurance and Performance Improvement sign in sheets and attendance records for Quarter One of 2025, failed to reveal the Infection Preventionist was in attendance. During an interview on 6/10/25, at 2:29 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four quarterly meeting (Quarter One of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for one of ten months (September 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated 5/1/25, indicated the purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Review of the Quality Assurance/Infection Control Preventionist job description indicated responsibility includes oversees the community's antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for August 2024 through May 2025, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for September 2024. During an interview on 6/11/25, at 2:40 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for one of ten months (September 2024). 28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections (2/10/25 to 3/5/25). Findings included: During an interview on 6/10/25, at 1:24 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Infection Preventionist Employee E12 sent an email on a Saturday saying she quit effective immediately. That's when we put Infection Preventionist Employee E13 into the role. Review of facility documents indicated Infection Preventionist Employee E12 worked from 7/15/24, to 2/9/25. Review of facility documents indicated Infection Preventionist Employee E13 worked from 2/12/25, to 4/21/25. Infection Preventionist Employee E13 did not complete specialized training in infection prevention and control and become certified until 3/6/25. During an interview on 6/11/25, at 2:40 p.m. the DON confirmed that the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for two of two crash carts (First and Second floor). Findings include: Review of the facility's Crash Cart Daily Signature Log dated 5/1/25, indicated the purpose of the form completed daily is to ensure that the emergency crash cart is in order and ready to use in case of emergency. During an observation of the first-floor crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) on 6/12/25, at 8:04 a.m. revealed a Crash Cart Daily Signature Log dated June 2025. The last completed entry was conducted on 6/9/25, three days overdue. Interview on 6/12/25, at 9:09 a.m. the Director of Nursing verified the last entry was 6/9/25, and that the audit had not been conducted in three days. During an observation of the second-floor crash cart on 6/12/25, at 8:15 a.m. revealed a Crash Cart Daily Signature Log dated June 2025. The audit was not conducted on 6/9/25, and the signature line was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0941 — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Communication training to five of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E15, E16, E17, E18, and E19). Findings include: Review of the facility policy In-Service Training dated 5/1/25, indicated all staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the resident ' s quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of the training. Required training topics include the following: - Effective Communication with residents and family - Resident Rights - Preventing Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property - Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) - Infection Prevention - Behavioral Health - Compliance and Ethics During an interview on 6/11/25, at 9:00 a.m. Human Resources Director Employee E6 stated that education is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for five of five staff members (Employees E15, E16, E17, E18, and E19). Findings include: Review of the facility policy In-Service Training dated 5/1/25, indicated all staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the resident ' s quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of the training. Required training topics include the following: - Effective Communication with residents and family - Resident Rights - Preventing Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property - QAPI - Infection Prevention - Behavioral Health - Compliance and Ethics During an interview on 6/11/25, at 9:00 a.m. Human Resources Director Employee E6 stated that education is conducted by calendar year…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for two of five staff members (Employees E18, and E19). Findings include: Review of the facility policy In-Service Training dated 5/1/25, indicated all staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of the training. Required training topics include the following: - Effective Communication with residents and family - Resident Rights - Preventing Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property - QAPI - Infection Prevention - Behavioral Health - Compliance and Ethics During an interview on 6/11/25, at 9:00 a.m. Human Resources Director Employee E6 stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December. Review of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to inform a resident's representative in advance of the proposed care, including the risk and benefits of the prescribed medication for one of five sampled residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 12/3/24, indicated she had diagnoses included end stage renal disease (permanent condition in which the kidneys are no longer able to filter waste from the blood), dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, problem-solving, and judgment) and chronic kidney disease. Further review of the MDS indicated the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment was 10 indicating moderately impairment. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of two residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R1, and R2). The findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer Form dated 5/12/24, indicated that the facility provides a completed and accurate transfer form to a resident transferred or discharged from our facility. A copy of the transfer form will be filed in the resident ' s medical record. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/19/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and cerebral infarction (necrotic tissue in the brain resulting loss of blood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for two of two resident hospital transfers (Residents R1, and R2). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Bed Holds and Returns, dated 5/12/24, indicated that residents or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility bed hold policies. All residents or representatives are provided information regarding the facility bed hold policies, which address holding or reserving residents bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents are provided information about these policies at least twice: admission packet, and at the time for transfer. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for two out of four residents (Resident R1, and R3). Findings include: The facility Activities of Daily Living policy dated 5/12/24, indicated that residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADL's. Care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently including bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to facility on 1/13/25. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 1/19/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and cerebral infarction (necrotic tissue in the brain resulting loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, facility tour, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (leaving an area without permission) for one of six residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Wandering and Elopements last reviewed 5/18/24, indicated that the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/5/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (neuro-cognitive disorder impacting reasoning, judgment, and memory), and psychotic disorder (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include: The facility Activities of Daily Living policy dated 5/12/24, indicated that residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADL ' s. Care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently including bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was originally admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 10/23/24, indicated that she had diagnoses that included high blood pressure, hip fracture, and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, closed clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a medical provider of a change in condition for one out of five closed resident records (Closed Resident Record CR1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Change in a resident's condition or status dated 5/18/24, indicated that the facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical, mental condition or status. Policy Interpretation and Implementation includes: The nurse will notify the resident's physician when there has been: a. accident or incident involving the resident. b. discovery of injuries of an unknown source. c. adverse reaction to medication. d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. A significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, job descriptions, documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from physical neglect for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated, 5/12/24, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The objective is to protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property by anyone to include facility staff. Review of the facility Nurse Aide Job Description dated May 2024, indicated the Nurse Aide (NA) will provide routine Activities of Daily Living (ADL - personal care activities like bathing, dressing, eating, mobility, and toileting) care in a manner conducive to the comfort and safety of residents and will be responsible for performing person centered care. Review of admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from misappropriation (the act of stealing something that you have been trusted to care of and using it for yourself) of medications for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R2 and Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated, 5/12/24, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The objective is to protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of property by anyone to include facility staff. Review of the facility policy Controlled Substances dated 5/12/24, indicated controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift. The nurse administering the medication must record it and sign.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly store food products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the Main Kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Receiving and Storage dated 5/18/24, indicated foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage. During an observation on 7/8/24, at 9:36 a.m. in the Main Kitchen Dry storage area, an open box contained a plastic bag of rice that was not sealed, and an additional open box that contained a plastic bag of pureed bread mix that also was not sealed. During an interview on 7/8/24, at 9:45 a.m. Dietary Director Employee E13 confirmed that the facility failed to properly store products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code: 211.6(c) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and resident, family and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy during medication administration for one of five residents (R51), failed to provide an environment that maintained and enhanced each resident's quality of life for one of two residents (Resident R75), and failed to treat resident with respect by failing to address a resident by their preferred name for one of three residents (Resident R93). Findings include: Review of facility policy Dignity dated 5/18/24, indicated that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well- being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents. Review of facility policy Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to acquire and document a physician's discharge order for one out of three resident records (Resident R133) reviewed, and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for five out of six residents sampled with facility initiated transfers (Residents R28, R43, R64, R75, and R83). Finding include: The facility Discharge Summary and Plan policy dated 5/18/24, indicated that when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment. The discharge summary will include a recapitalization of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that resident assessments were accurate for seven of 23 residents (Resident R2, R6, R21, R38, R64, R68, and R285). Findings include: Review of facility policy Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, dated 5/18/24, indicated the information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/26/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and muscle weakness. Review of Section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals indicated Resident R2 was coded as 1 dependent upon staff for roll left and right. Review of a physician order dated 2/22/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for four of six residents (Resident R4, R9, R83, R243) that resulted in worsening and new pressure area for one resident (Resident R83) and failed to prevent avoidable pressure ulcer development that of a new pressure ulcer for two of six residents (Resident R9). Findings include: Review of facility policy Prevention of Pressure Injuries, dated 5/18/24, indicated that the facility will conduct a comprehensive skin assessment upon (or soon after) admission with each risk assessment, as indicated according to the resident's risk factors, and prior to discharge. Use a standardized pressure injury screening tool to determine risk factors. Inspect skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care. Identify any signs of developing pressure injuries. Inspect pressure points sacrum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for three of four residents (Resident R53, R93, and R129). Findings include: Review of facility policy Catheter Care, Urinary dated 5/18/24, indicated that the facility should ensure that the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Review of facility policy Resident Rights dated 5/18/24, indicated that residents have the right to a dignified existence. Review of facility policy Dignity dated 5/18/24, indicated that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well- being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff are expected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services and properly monitor and assess weight and nutrition status for five of seven residents reviewed (Resident R28, R83,R91, R129, and R243). Findings include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 5/18/24, indicated that residents are to weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing. Unless notified of significant weight change, the dietitian will review the unit weight record monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: a) 1 month: 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b) 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of three residents (Residents R68, R285, and R334). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated 5/18/24, indicated prior to administering oxygen verify there is a physician's order and review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. It was indicated to check the mask, tank, and humidifying jar to be sure they are in good working order. Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and the water level is high enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows through. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R68's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/2/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, asthma (a condition where the airways narrow and swell), and Post-Traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate resident care plans and conduct ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for five of five residents (Residents R2, R6, R21, R28, and R64). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(n) - Bed Rails states that the facility must assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Additionally, there should be evidence in the resident's records that the facility performed ongoing assessments to assure that the bed rail is used to meet the resident's needs and that there is an ongoing evaluation of risks associated with bed rail usage. Review of facility policy Bed Safety and Bed Rails dated 5/18/24, indicated the use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising the side rails for episodic use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation for three of 16 residents (Resident R4, R9, and R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Charting and Documentation dated 5/18/24, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.709(i) Medical records. In accordance with accepted professional standards and practice, the facility must maintain medical records that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident records, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement an infection control program that included a system of surveillance to identify possible communicable diseases or infections for four of 11 months (March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024), failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of two residents (Resident R9), and failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for one out of five residents (R53). Findings include: Review of facility policy Surveillance for Infections dated 5/18/24, indicated the Infection Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcomes and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. The purpose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for three of 11 months (March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated 5/18/24, indicated the purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Review of the Quality Assurance/Infection Control Preventionist job description indicated responsibilities include overseeing the community's antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the facility's Infection Control surveillance for August 2023 through June 2024, failed to include documentation to indicate that antibiotic monitoring was completed for March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024. During an interview on 7/12/24, at 8:50 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for four of 11 months (March 2024, April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024). 28 Pa. Code:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility in-service documentation, personnel records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff received a minimum of twelve hours of in-service education training each year, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, as required for five out of five personnel records (Nurse Aide Employee E17, Nurse Aide Employee E18, Nurse Aide Employee E19, Nurse Aide Employee E20, and Nurse Aide Employee E21). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated 5/18/24, indicated that the facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Review of Nurse Aide Employee E17's personnel record indicated she was hired on 1/30/06. Review of Nurse Aide Employee E17's personnel record failed to include a minimum of 12 hours of nurse aide training per year as required under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for one of five residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Call System, Resident dated 5/18/24, indicated residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed, from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor. The resident call system remains functional at all times. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/7/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, muscle wasting, and dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R43). Review of the facility policy Advanced Directives, dated 5/18/24, indicated that upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive if he or she chooses to do so. Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advanced directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical chart. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 43's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), high blood pressure, and dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of three nursing units (Third Floor) and two of nine residents (Resident R9 and R285). Findings include: Review of facility policy Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy dated 5/18/24, indicated the facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records. Access to resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff and business associates. During an observation on 7/8/24, at 12:21 p.m. the Third Floor [NAME] Medication Cart at the nurse's station was left unattended with the computer screen open with identifiable information any passerby could see resident personal and confidential information. During an interview on 7/8/24, at 12:24 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E2 confirmed the above observation. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, grievance records, reports submitted to the state, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility abuse and neglect policy for two of four allegations (Resident R15 and Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating dated 5/18/24, indicated all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft, misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse or neglect is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Immediately is defined as: * within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or results in serious bodily injury; or * within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility grievances, reports submitted to the State, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse or neglect for one of four residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating dated 5/18/24, indicated all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft, misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse or neglect is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Immediately is defined as: - within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or - within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility grievances, investigation documentations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation involving an allegation of neglect for one out of four residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating dated 5/18/24, indicated all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft, misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse or neglect is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Immediately is defined as: - within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or - within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely recheck and notify the physician of decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels for one of three residents (Resident R284). Findings include: Review of facility policy Management of Hypoglycemia dated 5/18/24, indicated if a resident's blood sugar is less than 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl), but greater than 54 mg/dl then give the resident an oral form of rapidly absorbed glucose (15-20 grams). Notify the provider immediately, remain with the resident, and recheck the resident's blood glucose in 15 minutes. It was indicated to document the resident's blood glucose before intervention, note the blood sugar after each administration of rapid-acting glucose and follow-up blood sugar, record the resident's level of consciousness before and after intervention, document provider instructions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R284 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide to provide appropriate care and services to residents receiving tube feedings for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R51 and R83). Finding include: Review of facility policy Enteral Nutrition (nutrition provided via a tube inserted into the stomach) dated 5/18/24, indicated adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. The nurse confirms that orders for enteral nutrition are complete. Complete orders include the enteral nutrition product, and instructions for flushing. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, and stroke (occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced. This prevents brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients.) Review of Resident R51's care plan dated 5/3/24, indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent and complete communication with the dialysis center for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R4 and R334), and failed to implement a dialysis care plan for one of two resident's (Resident R4). Findings include: Review of the facility policy End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of Resident with dated 5/18/24, indicated agreements between the facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed including how the care plan will be developed and implemented, and how information will be exchanged between facilities. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/8/24, indicated with the diagnoses of end stage kidney disease (a condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of two residents (Resident R6 and R68). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma-Informed and Culturally Competent Care dated 5/18/24, indicated resident assessment involves an in-depth process of evaluating the presence of symptoms, their relationship to trauma, as well as the identification of triggers. The facility will develop individualized care plans that address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family, identify and decrease exposure to triggers that may re-traumatize the resident, and recognize the relationship between past trauma and current health conditions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent for one of three residents (Resident R51). Findings include: The observations listed below revealed seven medication errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 25%. Review of facility policy Administering Mediations through an Enteral Tube dated 5/18/24, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen into the stomach and can be used to provide liquid food, medications or liquids). General guidelines include administer each medication separately and flush between medications. . Review of Resident R51's clinical record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any significant medication errors for one of three residents. (Resident R51). Findings include: Review of facility policy Administering Mediations through an Enteral Tube dated 5/18/24, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen into the stomach and can be used to provide liquid food, medications or liquids). General guidelines include administer each medication separately and flush between medications. . Review of Resident R51 ' a clinical record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/2/24, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two out of five medication carts (3 East Medication Cart and 4 East Medication Cart), failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures utilized for medication storage in one of two nursing units (Fourth Floor Medication Room), and failed to properly secure a medication cart while not in use for one of five medications carts (2 North Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 5/18/24, indicated the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers, or other dispensing systems in which they are received. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a diagnosis for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end of life care for two of two residents (Resident R38 and R93). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hospice Program dated 5/18/24, indicated it is the responsibility of the facility to meet the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided is appropriately based on the individual resident's needs, including communicating with the hospice provider (and documenting such communication) to ensure that the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day. The coordinated care plan will reflect the resident's goals and wishes, as stated in his or her advanced directives and during ongoing communication with the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free from significant medication errors for three of seven residents (Residents R44, R291, and R287) which caused a pulmonary hypertension (a condition that affects the blood vessels in the lungs and develops when the blood pressure in the lungs is higher than normal) medication not to be administered. This failure resulted in a harm situation for one of seven residents (Resident R287). Review of facility policy Medication Administration: Injectables dated January 2023, indicated that injectable medication will be prepared for administration by verifying medication order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, right time, and any special instructions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BONCREST RESOURCE GROUP — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SENECA SENIOR CARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
BONCREST BRIDGE CITY LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
BONCREST RESOURCE GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
BAKER, AMELIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
CORRIGAN, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/01/2024
MATHENY, CYNTHIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
PAYNE, ORENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/03/2024
ROSENBAUM, MAURICEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024
OAKDALE SENIORS ALLIANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
POLAK, TRACYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/21/2025
SKELLY, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
WILSON, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
BAKER TILLY US LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/02/2024
SENECA PLACEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 3%Other / private 33%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$456per resident / day
operating cost
$13,877per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$343per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395790. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next