No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Creve Coeur Manor

1127 Timber Run Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63146 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (314) 434-8361 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (314) 434-8361 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)3 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12747 Olive Blvd · (314) 682-6100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12661 Olive Blvd · (314) 878-4413 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
12756 Olive Blvd · (314) 434-5569 · Call to confirm hours
Park
12647 Olive Blvd · (314) 878-7795 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
12465 Olive Blvd · (314) 434-2310

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased45.5%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms66.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.6%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.4%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.0%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.3%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine25.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.4%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.472.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.582.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.8–18.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.44
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
74.1%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 77.8 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.57 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-20)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff assessed and monitored one resident (Resident #3) identified as at risk for developing pressure ulcers (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction). When staff from an outside hospice agency identified a new skin issue and notified the facility nurse, the nurse failed to document the notification and failed to notify the physician timely, resulting in a delay in treatment. Two residents were sampled for pressure ulcers and problems were found with one. The sample was 6. The census was 73.Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 01/2023, showed the following:-Policy: Manage skin integrity through prevention, assessment, and implementation and evaluation of interventions;-Procedure:-The facility is provided with wound care protocols. These are to be utilized to assist in the care and treatment of wounds. These are to be utilized to assist in the care and treatment of wounds. This reference tool is placed in the nursing report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #307) was free of significant medication errors when they failed to obtain and administer two psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician for approximately one month. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 2/4/20, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -Cognitively intact; -Had delusions; -Rejected care; -Independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Continent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnosed with bipolar disorder, anxiety and depression. Review of hospital discharge papers showed the following: -The resident was admitted for inpatient psychiatric treatment on 1/13/20 and discharged on 2/4/20; -The admitting diagnosis was psychosis and generalized anxiety disorder; -The hospital diagnosis list included bipolar affective disorder (current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transcribed physician orders and administered medications as ordered for one resident (Resident #1) and to hold medication in accordance with parameters ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #2). The sample was 3. The census was 79.Review of the facility's Physician's Orders policy, dated February 2020, showed the following:-Elements of the medication order: Name of the medication, strength of the medication, dosage, time or frequency of administration ,route of administration if other than oral, quantity or duration (length) of therapy, diagnosis or indication, medication allergy;-Documentation of the medication order:-1. The physician's new orders may be received on the admission Physician's Order Form, by telephone or handwritten on the Physician Order Sheet (POS). All drug orders received via transfer sheet must be verified by the attending physician and transcribed onto the POS;-2. Each medication order is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident received gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a sterile tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach, used to provide nutrition and fluids) feedings and fluids as ordered. The facility identified three residents with tube feedings, one of whom was sampled and problems were found (Resident #1). The census was 80.Review of the facility's Tube Feeding, policy, dated 3/28/25, showed the following:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility of the facility that residents' nutritional needs will be met by tube feeding, when oral consumption is not possible and the resident consents;-Procedure included:--Check the physician's order to determine type and rate of feeding;--Set the pump for the rate ordered;--Start the pump.Review of the facility's Obtaining and Following Physician Orders policy, dated 7/2017, showed the following:-Policy: It is the policy of the facility that physician orders will be obtained by licensed personnel and followed. If those orders are not followed for any reason,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)), for four residents who required EBP for wound treatment or a medically inserted device (urinary catheter, a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the urinary tract to drain urine). The facility identified eleven residents requiring EBP, four residents were sampled and problems were found with all four residents (Residents #1, #2, #4, and #5). The census was 77. Review of the facility's Isolation Precautions/Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) policy, dated, 4/2/24, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse on duty at least eight hours daily. The RN passing medications on dates listed below was also serving as the Director of Nursing while the facility had an average daily occupancy of 68 residents. Findings include: Review of the resident census list provided by the administrator dated 11/12/24 revealed the occupancy was 69 residents in house, on 11/13/24 revealed 69 residents in house and on 11/14/24 revealed 68 residents in house. Observations on 11/12/24 at 10:15 AM, 11/13/24 at 2:30 PM, and 11/14/24 at 09:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was working as the charge nurse administering medications to residents while working in the capacity of the DON. According to the nurse schedule dated 11/01/24 through 11/14/24, provided by the Administrator, seven of fourteen days did not have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours a day, The following days did not have RN coverage at least eight consecutive hours a day on 11/01/24, 11/05/24. 11/06/24. 11/07/24, 11/08/24, 11/12/24, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on job description review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Dietary Manager (DM) met minimum qualifications when a Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full time at the facility. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents who receive food from dietary. Findings include: Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 11/11/24 at 9:40 AM, revealed he stated that he is not certified as a DM. Interview with the RD on 11/14/24 at 10:50 AM, revealed that she was at the facility eight hours a day one day a month. She stated she was responsible for the clinical aspects of the facility and advised the facility through reports of sanitation and food service. The RD stated that she was aware that the DM was not certified. Interview with the Administrator on 11/12/24 at 11:30 AM revealed she was aware of the lack of training when he accepted the job. We thought we could finish the training prior to the survey. Review of the facility job description titled Job Description-Dietary Manager undated indicated the qualifications for the job on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of menus, policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed for all four days of the survey. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents that receive food from dietary. Findings include: Observation of the first-floor food service on 11/13/24 at 12:40 PM revealed Dietary Aide (DA) 1 used a three ounces ladle to serve residents winter vegetables from the steam table. The menu/spreadsheet indicated that four ounces of vegetables. In addition, staff had no way to measure double portions of six ounces or single portions of three ounces of pot roast. Interview with DA1 at the time of the observation stated the cards provided do not have portion sizes or menus are not available. She stated that for the meat, I simply use my eyes and serving tongs to decide how much meat is to be provided. Observations of the first-floor food service on 11/13/24 at 12:40 PM revealed that DA1 served all nine mechanical soft diets whole pieces of pot roast, winter vegetables and scalloped potatoes. The menu indicated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, document review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards of practice including dishwasher sanitizing, cleaning, food storage and handling and processing food for serving. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents receiving food from dietary. Findings include: Observation on 11/11/24 at 9:47 AM revealed the temperature gauge on the dishwasher was stuck at 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The dishwasher was a low temperature machine and relies on sanitizer to sanitize the dishes during the final rinse. The machine specifics located on the side of the machine via label indicate for machines using sanitizer solutions to sanitize dishes, wash, rinse and sanitize water shall be minimum 120 degrees F. The facility continued to wash and distribute dishes. Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) at the time of the observation verified the temperature gauge problems.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure the area around the garbage dumpster area was free of trash on four of four days of the survey. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents. Findings include: Observations on 11/11/24 at 10:00 AM revealed the exterior garbage dumpster area had two dumpsters and the area around the dumpster had one college size broken pink refrigerator, numerous plastic gloves, food debris, numerous small and large cups for medicine, numerous fast-food bags, 10 cardboard boxes in various conditions, bottles of over-the-counter medicine, splatters of garbage, paper towels, plastic bags. Observations on 11/12/24 at 8:00 AM, 10:20 AM, 5:00 PM, 11/13/24 at 7:45 AM and 5:00 PM and 11/14/24 at 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM, revealed one of the dumpsters was noted to have the lid open. Interview with the Administrator on 11/12/24 at 10:20 AM revealed that housekeeping and maintenance maintain the area by cleaning it once a week. She stated she has no documentation related to when the area was cleaned. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained essential equipment in working condition. Specifically, the large walk-in refrigerator has been inoperable for over three months. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents that receive food from dietary. Findings include: Observation on 11/11/24 at 9:35AM revealed a 15' foot deep by 10' foot wide walk-in refrigerator in dietary that was empty of refrigerated food items. Interview with the Dietary Manager at the time of the observation indicated the large walk-in refrigerator has not worked since July of 2024. Interview with the Administrator on 11/11/24 at 10:20 AM provided an estimate to replace the refrigerator compressor.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 56 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected three residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #104, #107 and #106). In addition, the facility failed to provide notification when the resident's trust account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource for four residents (Resident #7, #101, #102, #105). The facility held funds for 51 residents. The census was 74. Review of the facility Resident's Rights Policy, undated, showed the following: -Notice of certain balances: The facility must notify each resident that received Medicaid benefits: -When the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the SSI resource limit for one person; -That, if the amount in the account, in addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of two floors, (the secured second floor) affecting the 30 residents of the second floor. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of food splatters on the walls, missing ceiling tiles, functioning door handles, holes in bedroom walls, holes in bathroom walls, unclean surfaces of tables, bathroom tiles, and clean equipment for the ice container creating an unpleasant environment for the residents. Findings include: During an initial tour of the second floor secured unit on 11/11/24 from 10:45 AM to 12:45 PM, the following concerns were observed and discussed with the Administrator, Maintenance Director (MD), and the Housekeeping Supervisor on 11/14/24 beginning at 09:49 AM. The dining room: The four of four tables were marred, scarred, had peeling purple paint, and had uncleanable surfaces. The walls had spills that had run down and were dried. The ice chest was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were screened to rule out the presence of a Federal Indicator, with the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Registry for seven staff members. A sample of 10 employees hired were reviewed. The facility hired at least 100 new employees since the last survey. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program, dated 9/29/22, showed the following: -Procedures for Prevention -Pre-employment Screening of Potential Employees: This facility will not knowingly employ any individual convicted of resident abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property. The facility will not knowingly employ any direct care staff convicted of any of the crimes listed in the State Healthcare Worker Background Check Act (unless waivered under the provision of the Act), or with findings of abuse listed on the State CNA Registry. The facility will not knowingly employ any licensed staff that have a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that diets provided were prepared and distributed as prescribed by the residents' physician for seven residents (R12, R43, R35, R171, R50, R4 and R26 ) out of 26 residents in the sample. The deficient practice has the potential for residents to lose weight. Findings include: 1. Review of R12's Face sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the profile tab revealed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes without complications, abnormal weight loss and pressure ulcer, sacral region stage 2. Review of R12's physician orders in the EMR under the orders tab revealed an order for a pureed diet, power potatoes for lunch, cheesy eggs for breakfast, ice cream for snacks, health shakes at each meal, whole milk at breakfast and apple or cranberry juice for lunch and dinner. Observations on 11/11/24 at 12:30 PM; 11/12/24 at 8:30 AM; 11/12/24 at 12:45 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their tuberculosis (TB, a potentially serious infectious bacterial disease that mainly affects the lungs) policy when staff failed to complete a two step and the annual one step of the employee TB screening tests in a timely manner for a total of five employees. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Tuberculosis Policy, dated 2005, showed the following; -Tuberculosis (TB) Screening - Employees -It is the policy of this facility that all healthcare workers will undergo testing for tuberculosis upon hire. Initial testing will be completed using the two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) procedure. The first dose being administered within seven days after being employed and the second dose administered one to three weeks after the first test, if the first test is negative. 1. Review of Staff Member A's employee file, showed the following: -Hire date: 10/1/22; -No documentation of an annual one step. 2. Review of Staff Member B's employee file, showed the following: -Hire date: 7/18/23; -No documentation of an annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat four of 26 sample residents (R) 14, R27, R171, and R220) with dignity and respect by failing to assist R171 with clean socks, to assist R220 to obtain clothing to wear instead of the hospital gown, and staff standing while assisting two (R27 and R14) residents to eat their meal. These failures created an undignified manor of care for the four residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R171's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R171 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, generalized anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/23/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 which indicated R171 was severely cognitively impaired. On 11/11/24 at 11:30 AM, R171 was observed wearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an alternative communication device for one resident (Resident (R) 35) of 26 sampled residents which failed to allow R35, who is non-verbal, a means to express himself. Findings include: Review of R35's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, generalized anxiety disorder, mood disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, dysphagia, and multiple sclerosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the RAI tab, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/17/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 which indicated R35 was not able to answer the questions. R35 was identified to be non-verbal. Review of the Care Plan located under the RAI tab in the EMR dated 09/13/24 did not identify how the resident would communicate his wants or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care in accordance with the resident's preferences for one of one resident (Resident (R)220) in the sample of 26 resident reviewed for skin care This failure had the potential to affect the physical, mental, and psychosocial health and well-being of the resident. Findings include: Review of R220's electronic medical record (EMR)Face sheet under the profile tab revealed R220 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis acute kidney failure, generalized muscle weakness, and obesity. Review of R220's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the EMR under the MDS tab with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/17/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated R220 was cognitively Intact. Observation on 11/11/24 at 10:42 AM, revealed R220's feet and legs that appeared to be extremely dry with flaking skin onto the bedsheets. Interview with R220 at this time, she stated she would like to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of three errors occurred out of 30 opportunities for error due to residents not receiving their medications on time for one resident (Residents (R)11) of six residents observed for medication administration. In addition, one of six residents (R41) received a medication that did not have a physician's order. The facility medication error rate was 6.67%. This failure had the potential to affect the accurate dosing of medication administered to the residents. Findings include: 1. During medication administration observation on 11/13/24 at 8:37AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1, administered R1 Daily-Vite with folic acid tablet (MVI) one tablet. Review of R41's Physician Orders dated November 2024 in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Orders tab indicated there was not a physician's order for the Daily Vite with folic acid medication. 2. During medication administration observation on 11/13/24 at 9:55AM, Certified Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the food residents received was at an appetizing temperature for one of three meals on one of four survey days. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 69 residents who receive food from dietary. Findings include: Observation of food temperatures on the steam tabled revealed the regular diet pot roast was 174 Fahrenheit (F), the scalloped potatoes were 202 degrees F and the winter vegetables were 175 degrees F. The cart left the kitchen at 12:40 PM and arrived at the first floor at 12:42 PM. Lunch was scheduled to be served at 12:00 PM. Observation on 11/13/24 at 1:10PM of the test tray temperatures on the first floor kitchenette revealed using a facility thermometer pot roast 106 F. The pot roast tasted cool. Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) at the time, he stated that the pot roast tasted cold to him. Interview with R11 at 1:15 PM on 11/13/24, after she had finished her meal, she stated the pot roast tasted cold. Review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    See the deficiency cited at Event K4Wl12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) was free from significant medication error by not obtaining the resident's prescribed narcotic in a timely manner. The sample size was three. The census 67. Review of the facility's Medication Order Policy, undated, showed: -This facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering of medication; -Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe; -Each medication order should be documented with the date, time and signature of the person receiving the order; -The order should be recorded on the physician order sheet, and the medication administration record (MAR); -Transcribe newly prescribed medication on the MAR or treatment record. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/13/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included heart failure, renal failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment by failing address plumbing and roofing issues that led to bulging, brown and rust-colored ceiling tiles in three residents' rooms (Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #12) and in the 100 hall shower room, that one resident used daily (Resident #1). The facility also failed to complete timely repairs and improvements to the walls in the main entrance lobby hallway leading to the main elevator. The sample size was 12. The census was 66. Review of the facility's Routine Maintenance policy, revision date, 8/16/22, showed maintenance staff is responsible to ensure that preventative, routine, maintenance is completed in compliance with applicable life safety standards and needs of the facility. Preventive and routine maintenance shall be completed according to the weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, and annual maintenance round forms. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) was free from significant medication error by not obtaining the resident's prescribed narcotic in a timely manner. The sample size was three. The census 67. Review of the facility's Medication Order Policy, undated, showed: -This facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering of medication; -Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe; -Each medication order should be documented with the date, time and signature of the person receiving the order; -The order should be recorded on the physician order sheet, and the medication administration record (MAR); -Transcribe newly prescribed medication on the MAR or treatment record. Review of Resident #1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/13/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included heart failure, renal failure, dementia and seizures; -On a scheduled pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services with the appropriate certification, when a consultant Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time with the facility. The census was 74. Review of the facility assessment, dated 5/22/23, showed the staffing plan included one contracted RD and one director of food/nutrition services. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 1:18 P.M., the Culinary Services Director said he worked as a cook in the facility for two years and has been employed in his current position for five months. He has a food certification. He was unable to specify the area of certification or provide a copy of the certification. The facility has a RD consultant with corporate who does not work with the facility full-time. During an interview on 8/11/23 at 7:40 A.M., the Administrator said the facility has a consultant RD who does not work for the facility on a full-time basis. The Culinary Service Director's certification and education information was requested. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to have a system for monitoring proper functioning of the dish machine to ensure proper sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods were stored at the appropriate temperatures to prevent foodborne illness. The facility failed to ensure foods were prepared and distributed under sanitary conditions when dietary staff failed to exhibit appropriate hand hygiene while serving food and to have facial hair properly covered during food preparation. The facility failed to appropriately store and handle dishware, and to store bulk dry goods and canned goods in a manner to protect from cross contamination. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 74. 1. Observation on 8/8/23 at 9:51 A.M., showed Dietary Aide (DA) D placed a bin of dirty dishes into the dish machine. The external temperature gauge on the dish machine showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to distribute interest (money paid regularly to depositors of money at a financial institution a particular rate) for residents who allowed the facility to manage their resident funds during the months of August 2022 through October 2022. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents who held funds below $50.00 in the interest bearing bank account were credited interest earned on the account. (Residents #62, #16, #426, #28, #41, #276, #52, #427, #428, #9, #2, #26, #50, #429, #430 and #27). The census was 74. Review of the facility's Resident Trust Fund (RTF) policy, revised 2/2020, showed: -The Business Office Manager has the primary responsibility for ensuring that residents' funds are appropriate and legitimate; -Interest is to be posted once a month to resident accounts with an account balance of $50.00 or greater. 1. Review of the RTF bank statements for August 2022, September 2022 and October 2022, showed 0.00% interest credited to the RTF interest-bearing bank account. During an interview on 8/9/23 at 4:07 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed for an accurate accounting of all monies, by failing to research outstanding checks. This affected residents whose funds were managed by the facility. The census was 74. 1. Review of the facility provided September 2022 Check Listing Report dated 9/30/22, showed the following outstanding checks that had not cleared the bank as of 8/8/23. Check Number Date Amount 1043 08/17/2020 $3,250.11 1137 01/27/2021 $0.65 1311 08/04/2021 $3,483.10 1318 08/10/2021 $12.00 1389 11/08/2021 $136.00 1420 12/14/2021 $0.80 Review of the facility October 2022 Bank Reconciliation on 8/9/23, showed the checks written in 2020 and 2021 were not listed under the reconciled checks. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 4:07 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said he/she had not followed up on any of the old outstanding checks and did not know if there was a process in place. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 12:12 P.M., the Regional Business Office Manager (RBOM) said the facility went under new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reasonable access to the use of a telephone in a place where calls could be made without being overheard. The facility additionally failed to provide reasonable access to send and receive mail on the weekends. The facility census was 74. Review of the Resident's Handbook, undated, showed: A telephone for private calls is available for resident use 24 hours a day and each resident room is equipped for a telephone. Review of the Resident's admission Packet, undated, showed: A resident has the right to have a reasonable access to the private use of a phone. 1. Observation and interview on 8/8/23 at 7:25 A.M., showed, on the second floor, two white telephones in an unlocked room on a desk. One telephone was unplugged and one telephone was connected to a phone jack and did not have a dial tone. Certified Medicine Technician (CMT) J verified the phones in the room were designated for resident use only.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they provided residents a homelike environment by failing to maintain clean shower rooms on the 200 and 100 halls, out of three shower rooms observed. The resident sample was 18. The census was 74. 1. Review of the facility's House Keeping Duties list, showed the following: -One housekeeper per floor (1st and 2nd), pull all trash in all rooms and bathrooms, wipe bedside tables off, wipe furniture if needed, clean all bathrooms in rooms, clean all bathrooms in the hallways, clean shower rooms, clean dining rooms (sweep and mop) only, sweep and mop all rooms, pull trash in the serving areas, wipe doors front and back along with door knobs, wipe coffee and soda stains off walls, wipe food off walls, dust picture frames, put bags at the bottom of each trash can, clean mirrors in each room, pick up wet floor signs before leaving. 2. Observation of the 200 hall resident shower room on 8/7/23 at 5:18 A.M., showed the toilet full of urine and stool, and brown matter smeared on the walls next to the toilet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents for four of 18 sampled residents (Residents #4, #61,#70, and #277). The census was 74. 1. Review of Resident #4's Medical Record, showed: -Medical diagnoses included: Pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) to the left hip, abnormal weight loss, muscle weakness, depression, heart failure, and cerebral infarction (a blood clot in the brain affecting cognition); -The following care areas were noted on the quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/17/23: Cognitive loss, urinary incontinence, psychosocial wellbeing, and falls; -A readmission weight of 149 pounds (lbs) on 5/3/23; -A diet order placed on 7/14/23 at 2:10 P.M., for a regular diet with regular consistency liquids, and specifications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) received personal care and showers in accordance with their needs and preferences (Residents #61, #40, #21 and #70). The sample was 18. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Bathing a Resident policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the company that residents will receive a shower/bath will be scheduled regularly and as needed (PRN); -Procedures included: -Check with the nurse to determine if special precautions need to be taken while showering or bathing the resident, e.g., cast, dressing, isolation precautions, toenails can be trimmed; -Assist the resident in showering/bathing if necessary; -Wash from head to feet, shampoo hair (if necessary), then wash perineal area; -Apply deodorant and lotion. If hair has been shampooed and will be dried in the resident's room, then towel dry hair and wrap in towel. Provide nail care if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activity program that incorporates the residents' interests and maintains and/or improves residents' physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for three residents (Resident #61, Resident #5 and Resident #63). The sample was 18. The census was 74. Review of the facility's undated Activity Program policy, showed: -An ongoing program of activities is designed to meet the needs of each resident; -The activity program is designed to encourage restoration to self-care and maintenance of normal activity which is geared to the individual resident's needs; -Activities are scheduled daily and residents are given an opportunity to contribute to the planning, preparation, conducting, cleanup and critique of the program; -The activity program consists of individual, and small and large group activities which are designed to meet the needs and interests of each resident and includes, at a minimum: -Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. The census was 74. Review of the facility's undated Activities Program Staffing policy, showed: -The activity program is staffed with personnel who have appropriate training and experience to meet the needs and interests of each resident; -The activity program is under the direct supervision of a qualified professional who: - Is a qualified therapeutic specialist or an activities professional who is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which the person is practicing; -Is eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990; -Or has two years' experience in a social or recreational program within the last five years; -Or is a qualified occupational therapist or occupation therapy assistant; -Or has completed a training course approved by the state. During an interview on 8/9/23 at 2:30 P.M., the Activities Director (AD) said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing restorative nursing program (RNP) to ensure residents maintained their functional ability to the greatest extent possible (Residents #40, #16, #31, #35 and #57). The facility identified 20 residents as qualified for restorative therapy (RT) services. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the company to provide restorative nursing which promotes the resident's ability to live as independently and safely as possible. Restorative nursing focuses on achieving and maintaining the optimum level of physical, mental, and psychological function of the resident; -Procedure included: -Restorative nursing services are provided by Restorative Nursing Assistants, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and other staff trained in restorative techniques; -Restorative nursing is under nursing supervision; -Every resident who receives restorative nursing has a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper gait belt usage and the care planning of gait belt usage to ensure resident safety for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents #57 and #35) and failed to complete a smoking assessment and supervision for one sampled resident (Resident #126). The census was 74. 1. Review of the facility's Gait Belt Use policy, revised July 2014, showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy that gait belts will be used when staff are transferring weight bearing residents or assisting them with walking for the safety of the resident or the employee; -Procedure: -Explain to the resident what is about to happen. The gait belt is placed around the resident's waist; -Fasten the gait belt snuggly, but not too tight. Be careful of tubes, wounds, or incisions; -When transferring the resident, use good body mechanics, bend knees, not back, reach under the resident's arms and hold the gait belt behind his/her back. Assist the resident to stand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as charge nurse when the facility's average daily census was greater than 60 residents. The facility census was 74. Review of the facility's resident census for the duration of the survey and licensure process, showed a daily census of 72 residents at the facility. Observation of the lunch meal on 8/9/23 at 5:41 P.M. showed a resident rested in bed with the dinner meal placed on his/her side table over the bed. The facility DON provided assistance to the resident with eating the meal of navy bean soup, a fruit cup, and a tuna sandwich. During interview on 8/11/23 at 9:03 A.M., the facility administrator and DON estimated the average daily census at the facility is around 70 residents. When asked how many days this week the DON was needed to work the floor in order to provide adequate staffing levels for resident care, the DON responded all of them. The DON said she typically works the 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. shift once or twice a week as the charge nurse and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored per acceptable standards of practice. These practices affected one out of three medication carts and one out of one medication room reviewed. The census was 74. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Labels policy, undated, showed: -Labels are permanently affixed to the outside of the prescription container; -Each prescription medication label or package includes: -The resident's name; -Specific directions for use, including route of administration; -Medication name; -Strength of medication; -Prescribers name; -Date dispensed; -Quantity of medication; -Beyond use (or expiration) date of medication on the package. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance policy, revised July/2014, showed: -Controlled substances must be stored in the mediation room in a locked container or in a mediation care in a locked box, separate from containers for any non-controlled medications. 2. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for Advair inhaler (a medication used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to maintain resident dignity by speaking to and assisting one resident (Resident # 37) during mealtime in a disrespectful manner. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident came to the dining room in clean and odor free clothing (Resident #61) and one resident wore proper undergarments to enhance his/her dignity (Resident #70). The census was 74. Review of the Resident Rights admission Packet, undated, showed: The facility shall care for its residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. 1. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/17/23, showed: -The resident is rarely or never understood; -No rejection of care or behaviors; -Required supervision with eating. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the survey, showed: -Focus: Behavioral symptoms;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure Resident #57 had assistive devices while eating. The sample was 18. The census was 74. Review of Resident #57's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/7/23, showed the following: -Diagnoses of legal blindness, chronic kidney disease and hypertension; Cognition not listed; -Supervision/touch assistance needed when eating. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/7/23, showed the following: -Problem: resident is on a mechanical soft diet. He/She has special devices needed during meals: divided plate, dycem (a non slip material used under a resident's plate to avoid plate movement), and food in bowls; -Goal: Resident to follow diet as much as possible x 90 days; -Approach: Diet as ordered: mechanical soft. Resident prefers to eat meals in room/eat meals in dining room Observation on 8/8/23 at 7:53 A.M., showed the resident ate cereal with his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that each resident receives an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, by staff qualified to assess relevant care areas and are knowledgeable about the resident's status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline. Inaccurate assessments occurred for two of three closed record sampled residents (Residents #73 and #74). The census was 74. 1. Review of Resident #73's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment, dated [DATE], showed: -The resident discharged [DATE]; -discharged to an acute care hospital. Review of the resident's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed an order dated [DATE], for discharge to a different long term care facility with current medications. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On [DATE] at 1:23 P.M., discharge order and has been accepted to a different long term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care provided met acceptable standards of nursing practice. This included medication administration incongruent with the medical record for one resident and nutritional tube feedings not provided as ordered for one resident (Residents #1 and #55). The facility census was 74. Review of the facility's Monitoring of Medication Administration policy, undated, showed: -To administer all medication safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis; -Read and follow any special instructions written on labels. 1. Review of Resident #1's electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed: -An order dated 11/20/17, for Melatonin (natural sleep supplement) 3 milligram (mg). One table per gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach to provide nutrition, hydration and medication) at bed time for sleep; -An order dated 2/07/23, for acetaminophen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide diets and supplements as ordered to ensure residents maintained acceptable nutritional status for two residents with weight loss, one of which was significant (Residents #4 and #40). The facility also failed to appropriately monitor meal intake and develop and/or implement resident specific-interventions to address weight loss. The sample was 18. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Nutritional Assessments policy, revised January 2012, showed: -Policy: All residents who experience significant or undesirable weight loss shall be assessed for nutritional status and required intervention by the Registered, Licensed Dietitian (RDLD). A course of action increasing calories shall be implemented unless the weight loss is deemed desirable and necessary for medical status. If increasing calories are required, a request for supplementation shall be made by the RDLD to the physician through nursing. The order shall be for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt for all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for one out of one medication room reviewed. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance policy, revised July 2014, showed: -Controlled substance must be counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the order, along with the person delivering the medication order, must count the controlled substances together; both individuals must sign the designated narcotic record; -Controlled substances must be stored in the mediation room in a locked container or in a mediation cart in a locked box, separate from containers for any non-controlled medications. Observation and interview on 8/8/23 at 9:07 A.M., in the second floor locked medication room, showed 59 vials of lorazepam (a medication to treat anxiety) 2 milligrams (mg) per milliliter (ml) located in an unlocked refrigerator. The packaging on the medication bags that the lorazepam was being stored showed 60 vials of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were re-evaluated after 14 days for two residents (Resident #50 and Resident #61). The sample size was 18. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised December 2018, showed: -Residents do not receive psychotropic drugs pursuant to a PRN order unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #50's Quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 8/1/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -No behaviors; -Rejection of care one to three days; -Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications with a less than five percent medication error rate. Out of 25 opportunities for error, two errors occurred, resulting in an 8% medication error rate (Resident #1). The sample size was 25. The census was 74. Review of the facility's undated Monitoring of Medication Administration policy, showed: -Based on the facility medication administration policy designated nursing staff to administer all medication safely and appropriately to aid resident to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis; -Review the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). Read each order entirely; -If there is any discrepancy between the MAR and the label, check physician orders before administering medication; -If the label is wrong it is the responsibility of the nurse to apply a Direction Change sticker to the medication label; -If the medication is discontinued or outdated, removed medication for proper disposal. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and follow recipes to ensure adequate nutritive value of fortified foods (super cereal and power potatoes) used to assist residents in maintaining acceptable nutritional status (Residents #40 and #4). The census was 74. 1. Review of Resident #40's medical record, showed diagnoses included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, low potassium, anemia (blood disorder), multiple sclerosis (nervous system disease affecting the brain and spinal cord), anxiety, and depression. Review of the resident's electronic Physician Order Sheet (ePOS), showed an order, dated 10/19/22, for regular diet. Special instructions included super cereal for breakfast and power potatoes for lunch. Review of the resident's nurse practitioner note, dated 6/14/23, showed chief complaint of follow-up related to weight loss. Weight is stable. Weight is 177.2 lbs. Abnormal weight loss. Continue with power potatoes, super cereal, health shakes three times a day, and larger portions of meals. Review of the resident's care plan, in use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure arrangements were made for pain management services outside of the facility for two residents prescribed narcotic pain medication (Residents #16 and #126). The sample was 18. The census was 74. 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record, showed diagnoses included pain in left knee and anxiety. Review of the resident's electronic Physician Order Sheet (ePOS), showed an order, dated 5/12/23, for tramadol (pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg), three times a day as needed (PRN). Review of the resident's June 2023 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), showed; -Tramadol administered 46 times; -No tramadol documented as administered after 6/24/23. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/28/23, showed: -Cognitively intact; -On a scheduled pain medication regimen; -Diagnoses included osteoarthritis. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff failed to document skin assessments for one resident with a blister on his/her left heel (Resident #5). Staff documented nutritional supplements as administered for two residents (Residents #40 and #4) when the supplements were not provided, and staff failed to accurately document meal intake in accordance with physician orders. The sample was 18. The census was 74. Review of the facility's Charting policy, revised February 2012, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the company that all services provided to the residents, or any changes in the resident's condition, shall be recorded in the resident's medical record; -Procedures included: All observations, medications given, services performed, etc., must be recorded in the resident's chart. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-03-06 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and failed to document the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident or responsible party for two residents (Residents #77, #241) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 99. The administrator said the facility does not have a policy directing staff on completion of the baseline care plan. 1. Review of Resident #77's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/3/20, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -admission date of 1/3/20; -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Total physical dependence of one staff for transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing; -Extensive physical assistance of one staff for locomotion; -Limited physical assistance of one staff for eating; -Limited range of motion of the upper extremity on one side; -Always incontinent of bladder, frequently incontinent of bowel; -Occasional complaint of pain rated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure they observed three residents (Residents #19, #28 and #44) take their medications, failed to ensure two residents (Residents #28 and #47) did not have inhalers left at their bedsides, and failed to apply the appropriate treatment to one resident's (Resident #53) pressure ulcer. The facility census was 99. 1. Observation on 3/3/20 at 4:48 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) K administered to Resident #28, the following medications: -Docusate sodium (laxative) 100 milligrams (mg); -Eliquis (anticoagulant) 100 mg tablet; -Tamsulosin (treats symptoms of enlarged prostate) 0.4 mg capsule. The CMT handed the resident a cup of the three medications, then left the resident's room and did not observe the resident take the medications. 2. Observation on 3/3/20 at 5:05 P.M., showed CMT K prepared medications for Resident #19 in the hallway outside the resident's room. The CMT popped Metformin 1000 mg, one tablet into a cup and handed the cup to Resident #18 (Resident #19's spouse), and allowed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) served as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of the Facility Assessment, dated June 2019, showed it did not address the DON serving as a charge nurse. Review of the facility's Daily Assignments schedule, dated 3/1/20 - 3/6/20, showed the DON was assigned to work as a charge nurse on the day shift on Monday, 3/2/20, and on on Tuesday 3/3/20. During an interview, the DON said he/she had been employed at the facility for two weeks. The DON said, in addition to occasionally working as the charge nurse for a shift, the DON covers the floor when a nurse must leave early in the morning or come in late in the evening. During an interview., the administrator said the DON often works on the floor as a charge nurse, including on 3/2/20 and 3/3/20. He/She was not aware the DON could not work as a charge nurse if the facility had 60 or more residents.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light bulbs illuminated in the hallway for resident rooms and resident bathrooms when the call light button was activated. This practice potentially affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 99 residents. 1. Observations with the Maintenance supervisor on 3/06/20, showed: -At 8:56 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER], the call light to the hallway was burnt out. -At 10:29 AM., the call light bulb on the ground level and used by residents when in activities had been disabled and was not in working condition. During an interview on 3/06/20 at 10:29 A.M., the maintenance director said he did not know about these, because he had not been told by the staff there was a problem.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure two dependent residents (Residents #53 and #72) had their call lights within reach to allow them to call when they required staff assistance. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of Resident #72's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/14/20, showed the following staff assessment: -Understands others; -Usually understood; -Dependence on staff assistance for completion of his/her activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan for the area of ADL functional status, not dated, showed the resident needs assistance from one staff member. Review of the resident's care card showed the following: -Staff are directed to assist x 1 with all ADLs; -The resident self-propels in a wheelchair; -The resident is at risk for falls; -The resident is incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 3/2/20 at 4:56 P.M. showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #77) physician's orders for his/her code status matched the resident's advance directive wishes and failed to ensure two residents' (Residents #65 and #307) current physician's orders listed the resident's code status. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of Resident #65's code status form in front of the medical record, dated [DATE], showed the resident wished to be a full code. Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS) dated [DATE]-[DATE] showed no code status listed on the resident's current physician's orders. 2. Review of Resident #77's Code Status Form in his/her medical record showed it is his/her choice to be a Full Code (Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) would be performed if the resident's heart and/or breathing stopped). Review of the POS, dated [DATE] - [DATE], showed the resident did not have an order for code status. 3. Review of Resident #307's Code Status Form in front of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to revise, review and/or update the comprehensive care plan for three residents (Residents #31, #44, and #46). Review of the facility's undated Comprehensive Care Plan Development policy and procedure, showed it is the policy of the facility to complete a comprehensive care plan for each resident requiring a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and care area assessment (CAA) completion. 1) The care plan is based on the CAA process, which is required for Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA)-required comprehensive assessments. 2) After completing the MDS and CAA portions of the comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team must evaluate the information gained to develop a care plan that addresses those findings in the context of the resident's strengths, problems, and needs. 3) A new care plan does not need to be developed after each annual assessment or significant change assessment, but the MDS and CAAs should be assessed for the need to modify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate and appropriate perineal cleansing for two dependent residents (Residents #23 and #46) and failed to ensure good grooming for one resident's (Resident #72) fingernails. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of Resident #23's most recent MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following staff assessment: - Required extensive assistance from staff for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; - Always incontinent of bladder; - Frequently incontinent of bowel; - Diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the resident's care plan, with multiple dates, showed the following: - The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers. Staff were directed to manage moisture (skin and incontinence management); - The resident was reluctant to perform personal hygiene without assistance. Staff were directed to assist as needed. Observation on 3/3/20 at 9:50 A.M., showed certified nurse aide (CNA) B provided care for the resident while the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, facility staff failed to implement new interventions for one resident (Resident #66) after he/she resident had multiple falls. In addition, staff failed to follow the facility policy for falls. The facility census was 99. Review of the facility's Tracking Record for Improving Patient Safety (TRIPS), undated, showed the following: - It is the policy of this facility that a TRIPS form is completed on every resident experiencing a fall; - After evaluating and treating the resident immediately, the nurse should investigate the circumstances of the falls and look at all possible causes. All licensed nurses will be trained in the immediate fall response; - The Falls Nurse Coordinator will use the data recorded on the TRIPS form to identify trends related to types of falls. Such details include location, time and activity; - The nurse is still required to complete a narrative nurses note. 1. Review of Resident #66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 1/14/20, showed staff assessed the resident as follows: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #241), when they did not evaluate the resident's usual patterns of behavior, did not document changes in the resident's behavior, did not document they informed the physician about changes in a resident's behavior, and did not implement individualized non-pharmacological interventions to address the resident's behavioral symptoms. The facility census was 99. Review of the facility's Behavior Management Policy, undated, showed the following: - It is the policy of this facility to identify behavioral symptoms using appropriate screening tools, manage behavioral symptoms appropriately and comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral changes. Behavior can be a way for an individual in distress to communicate unmet needs, indicate discomfort or express thoughts that cannot be articulated; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident #16) was not given psychotropic medication unless necessary, when they started the resident on Seroquel (an antipsychotic), after the hospital directed this medication be discontinued, increased the dose of this medication from 12.5 mg to 50 mg without any indications to do so, and did not address a pharmacist's recommendation to clarify the dose of the Seroquel. Additionally, the facility staff failed to perform Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) on psychotropic medications in accordance with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines for one resident (Resident #78). The facility census was 99. Review of the facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use Policy, dated 2015, showed the facility will attempt to taper psychotropic medication use in at least two separate quarters with at least one month between attempts, unless clinically contraindicated, during the first year. This will occur for both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure they administered medications with an error rate of less than five percent. Facility staff made two errors of a total of 32 medications passed, yielding an error rate of 6.25%. The facility census was 99. 1. Review of Resident #18's physician's order sheet (POS) dated 3/1/20-3/31/20, showed a physician's order for Meloxicam (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication used to treat arthritis) tablet, give one by mouth twice daily with food. Review of potential side effects of Meloxicam include upset stomach, nausea, vomiting, heartburn, diarrhea constipation, and serious gastrointestinal effects including bleeding, ulceration and perforation of the stomach or intestines. Observation on 3/3/20 at 5:07 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) K administered to the resident, his/her Meloxicam tablet in the resident's room without any food. Review of the facility's dining times showed dinner was served starting at 5:30 P.M. During an interview on 3/6/20 at 5:30 P.M., the administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to label and store medications in an appropriate manner when they failed to date insulin and multi-use vials on the date the vials were opened, failed to ensure medication carts were free of loose pills, and failed to discard expired medications. The facility census was 99. 1. Observation on 3/5/20 at 10:17 A.M., of the medication room on the first floor of the facility showed the following: In an upper storage cabinet: -A 100 count box of bisacodyl suppositories (laxative) with an expiration date of 9/19; -A four ounce bottle of Ultra tuss cough suppressant expectorant with an expiration date of 9/19; -A 100 count box of mucus relief guaifenesin (reduces chest congestion) 400 mg, with an expiration date of 12/19; -A one-half ounce bottle of ear drops earwax removal aide with an expiration date of 10/19; -A 16 ounce bottle of iron supplement elixir ferrous sulfate 220 mg with an expiration date of 1/20. In a medication refrigerator: -A bottle of Brisk lemonade stored in the freezer portion of the refrigerator; -An opened vial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to adequately clean and disinfect multi-use blood glucose meters between resident use and failed to clean vials of insulin prior to removing insulin for injection for one resident (Resident #19). The facility census was 99. 1. Observation on 3/3/20 at 4:57 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) K obtained the multi-use blood glucose meter from a container in the top drawer of the CMT medication cart. The CMT did not clean the machine before he/she used the machine to check Resident #19's fingerstick blood glucose level. After obtaining the blood glucose result, the CMT placed the blood glucose meter back into the top drawer of the medication cart without cleaning the meter. The CMT then obtained the resident's Levimir insulin and the resident's Novolog insulin bottles from a container in the top drawer of the medication cart which held multiple other residents' insulin bottles, and drew up the doses of insulin without first cleaning the tops of the vials. Observation on 3/5/20 at 4:10 P.M., showed CMT D obtained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to maintain and follow policies and procedures for immunization of residents against pneumococcal disease as required. The facility staff failed to provide and document provision of pertinent information regarding the pneumococcal vaccine including the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine for six residents (Residents #1, #6, #8, #21, #77, and #88). The facility also failed to assess and vaccinate eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccine with recommended doses of pneumococcal vaccine as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The facility census was 99. Review of the US Department of Health and Human Services CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated 11/30/15 showed the following: -Two pneumococcal vaccines were recommended for adults: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13, PREVNAR13) and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23, Pneumovax 23); -One dose of PCV 13 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-20 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the required daily nurse staffing report at any place in the nursing facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and visitors of the facility. Findings include: Observations on 11/12/24 - 11/14/24, the nurse staffing was not posted anywhere in the facility, instead it was located in a notebook at the nurses' station. The nurse staffing document in the notebook did not identify the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked per shift for Registered Nurse (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPNs), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) who were responsible for resident care. During an interview with the staffing coordinator, on 11/13/24 at 3:30 PM, she stated that she did not know that nurse staffing sheets were to be posted in the facility in a prominent place and accessible to residents and visitors. She confirmed the daily nurse documents were in a notebook at the nurse's station. She confirmed the staffing information in the notebook at the nurse's station did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-11 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives, the name, address, and telephone number for the State Survey Agency, and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal nursing facility regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The census was 74. Observations throughout the survey from 8/7/23 through 8/11/23, showed no contact information for the State Survey Agency posted on the 1st or 2nd floors, where resident rooms and common areas were located. During a resident council meeting on 8/9/23 at 2:00 P.M., four out of four residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, said they did not know where contact information for the State Survey Agency was kept. They did not know how to report a complaint to the State Survey Agency. During an interview on 8/11/23 at 7:40 A.M., the Administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2020-03-06 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to post the required daily nurse staffing hours in a prominent place readily accessible to residents. The facility census was 99. 1. Observation on 3/2/20 at 11:30 A.M., showed the nurse staffing hours posted on a bulletin board on the ground level of the facility across from the timeclock. The staffing hours were posted at eye level when standing and could not be easily viewed from a sitting position, such as a from a wheelchair. Observation on 3/3, 3/4, 3/5, and 3/620, showed the 24 hour nurse staffing to be posted on a bulletin board on the ground level. Observation showed the 24 hour nurse staffing was not available to all residents on the Floor 1 and Floor 2. During an interview on 3/6/20 at 10:19 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D said the nurse staffing information was posted by the timeclock on the basement level, but not on the second floor. During an interview on 3/6/20 at 5:30 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said the 24 hour nurse staffing was only posted on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PALLADIAN HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MILLER, STEPHENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 10/01/2022
DIRSCHUWEIT, JEANNEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2022
MILLS, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$292K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 4%Other / private 12%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $292K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,576per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$206per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265720. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next