No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

U-City Forest Manor

1301 Partridge Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63130 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (314) 862-5556 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026Resident-funds citations (F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,949 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,949 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
965 Midland Blvd · (314) 781-5999 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
941 Midland Blvd · (314) 390-1616 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6840 Page Ave · (314) 726-2184 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1300 Partridge Ave · (314) 505-8625 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased52.2%18.1%15.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms81.5%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened41.4%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.0%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.9%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.5%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication12.5%2.2%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.272.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.832.331.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.7–19.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
60.7%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.57 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.68 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

68 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, by not ensuring staff were within arm's reach of a resident with a diagnosis of dysphasia (trouble swallowing) and a history of choking (Resident #1). On 11/21/24, the resident choked during lunch while eating alone at a table in the dining room. Staff intervened and were unsuccessful with clearing the resident's airway and performed lifesaving measures until emergency medical staff (EMS) arrived. EMS staff were eventually able to dislodge a large piece of broccoli, a food that was not served on the resident's lunch tray. Resident #1 expired. The sample size was 5. The census was 81. The Administrator was notified on 12/6/24 at 4:00 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 11/21/24. The IJ was removed on 12/8/24, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's Change in Condition policy, revised 2/2012, showed: Definition: -Change in condition is defined as an improvement or decline in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility staff used proper hand hygiene during meal service affecting seven Residents (Residents #54, #2, #47, #25, #29, #26, and #30) and failed to ensure hair restraints were worn properly while handling food in the kitchen. The sample size was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's handwashing policy, dated 1/2012, showed:-Policy: Handwashing facilities will be readily accessible and equipped with paper towels and soap. Staff will wash hands frequently as needed throughout the day following proper handwashing procedure;-Procedure: When to wash hands; after touching ears, nose, mouth, hair, etc. Any contact with infected or otherwise unsanitary areas of the body. Hand contact with unclean equipment or work surfaces. Hand contact with soiled clothing or other materials that are soiled. Review of the facility's personal hygiene and appearance policy, dated 1/2012, showed:-Purpose: To ensure a clean and proper uniform appearance consistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six discharged residents had their money returned after discharge within 30 days (Residents #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, and #94), and failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) letters were sent and followed up on to for two residents who expired with balances in their account (Residents #95 and #96). The census was 81. Review of the facility's resident trust policy, undated, showed:-The Business Office Manager(BOM) has the primary responsibility for ensuring that residents' funds held in the trust are kept safe, are properly accounted for, and that all payments from the residents' funds are appropriate and legitimate;-Procedure: discharged /deceased resident accounts need to be refunded to theresident or Medicaid no later than 30 days from date of discharge. 1. Review of Resident #89's resident trust account, showed:-Resident discharged on [DATE];-The account had a balance of $1,644.00;-No record of funds returned to the resident. 2. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure common areas in the facility were maintained in a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Concerns were identified with two of 20 sampled residents (Resident #45 and #39), the Memory Care Courtyard and resident hall shower rooms on the 100, 200 and 300 halls. The census was 81.1. Review of the facility's Night Shift Assignment Sheet, undated, showed wheelchairs should be cleaned nightly. 2. Review of the facility's housekeeping cleaning schedule for March of 2026, showed shower rooms on all resident halls were to be cleaned once weekly on Sundays. 3. Review of Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated, 3/9/26, showed:-Diagnoses included depression and schizophrenia (a mental disorder that distorts reality);-The resident uses a wheelchair. Observation on 3/23/26 at 6:20 A.M., 3/25/26 at 9:25 A.M., and 3/27/26 at 10:30 A.M., showed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure controlled medications were securely stored under two locks for one out of one medication room observed. The facility also failed to label eye drops with an open and expiration date for two out of four medication carts reviewed. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated [DATE], showed:-Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer or supplier recommendations;-All drugs classified as a controlled substance will be stored under double locks;-The policy did not address labeling of eye drops. 1.Observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:05 A.M. of the Central Medication Room, showed a refrigerator with no lock. Inside the refrigerator showed 56 vials of Lorazepam (a controlled substance medication used to treat anxiety) 2 milligrams (mgs) per milliliter (ml) not secure in a locked container. The Lorazepam vials expired [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, precautions for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO, microorganisms that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) or any resident who has a chronic wound and/or indwelling medical device) during care and failed to follow acceptable infection control practices during wound care, medication administration and direct patient care related to hygiene, for three of three residents observed for wound care (Residents #5, #26 and #77). The facility also failed to follow acceptable infection control practices during blood glucose testing. In addition, staff failed to ensure one out of five residents sampled for vaccinations and health screenings had a two-step tuberculosis (TB, infectious lung disease) screening within the 30-day post admission, per facility policy (Resident #49). The sample was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to treat residents with dignity while providing care to one resident (Resident #5). The sample size was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, last revised 8/31/26, showed: The resident has a right to a dignified existence. The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/9/26, showed cognitive status not assessed. Review of the resident's medical record, showed diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and gastrostomy tube (G-Tube), a tube that is surgically inserted into the abdomen and is used for medications and liquid nutrition. Observation on 3/25/26 at 8:53 A.M., showed Registered Nurse (RN) Q prepared the resident's medication at the medication cart and entered the resident's room without knocking. The resident lay in bed. RN Q moved the resident's arms away to obtain access to the resident's hygiene g-tube.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure call lights were in reach for two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #5). The sample size was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Answering the Call Light policy, last revised, July 2014, showed:-Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs;-General guidelines: When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. Some residents may not be able to use their call light. Be sure these residents are checked on frequently. 1. Review of Resident #26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/23/25, showed:-Diagnoses included type two diabetes, acute kidney failure, and acquired absence of right leg above the knee;-Cognitively intact. Review of the resident's 5-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directive/code status forms (a legal document, often a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, that tells medical professionals not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if the heart or breathing stops) were not documented, updated and/or reviewed annually for three of 20 sampled residents (Residents #7, #15, and #47). The census was 81.Review of the facility's Advance Directive policy, dated [DATE], showed:-Policy statement: Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy;-Policy Interpretation and Implementation;-Upon admission, the resident will be provided with the written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so;-Written information will include a description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives and applicable state law;-Information about whether or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse when Restorative Aide/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E grabbed the resident's right arm from behind him/her to put the arm on his/her lap. The resident was non-verbal and provided several non-verbal actions of refusal when Restorative Aide/CNA E pried the resident's fingers off the wheelchair (WC) wheel and pulled the arm forward so forcefully that it nearly caused the resident to fall forward out of the chair (Resident #34). The sample size was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Abuse policy, dated September 2022, showed: Definitions:-Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with the resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also included the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or service that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instance of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) accurately reflected the resident's status of having a life expectancy of less than six months when they received hospice services (a service provided when a resident has a condition indicating a life expectancy of less than six months as certified by the hospice physician) for two of eight residents identified by the facility as receiving hospice services (Residents #47 and #69). The census was 81. 1. Review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, dementia, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, and schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition that includes features of both schizophrenia and a mood disorder);-Severe cognitive impairment;-Section J (health conditions) was marked as no for having a life expectancy of six months or less. Review of the 60-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents had a baseline care plan created within 48 hours of admission (Resident #15). The census was 81. Review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan policy, dated 8/2017, showed:-Policy: The facility will develop and implement a baseline plan of care for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury, such as elopement or fall risk, and will identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assistance with activities of daily living, as necessary;-Procedure: The baseline plan of care will be developed within 48 hours of resident's admission and will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 20 sampled residents received comprehensive care plans specific to their needs while admitted at the facility (Residents #26, #47 and #77). Resident #26's care plan did not include information and interventions for multiple falls in the facility, Resident #47's care plan did not include hospice services, and Resident #77's care plan did not include concerns regarding skin conditions. The census was 81.Review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) policy, revised, 10/20/22, showed:-Within seven days of the completion of the resident assessment, a comprehensive care plan will be developed. Care plans shall be culturally competent and trauma-informed. This includes interventions that reflect the resident's cultural preferences, values, and practices and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that cause re-traumatization;-The Interdisciplinary Team must develop,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #46) received care and services in accordance with professional standards by failing to notify the physician the resident was not wearing thromboembolic deterrent stockings (TEDS) (stockings used to prevent blood clots in the legs). The facility also failed to provide alternative interventions to address the resident's lower leg edema (swelling). The sample size was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Obtaining and Following Physician orders, last revised, July 2017, showed:-Policy: Physician orders will be obtained by licensed personal and followed; If the licensed professional does not in his/her best judgement think that the order is not in the best interest of the resident, he/she has the obligation to further investigate prior to fulfilling the order; If these orders are not followed by any reason, the physician and Director of Nursing (DON) will be promptly notified. Review of Resident #46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatments and assessments for two of two residents sampled for wounds (Residents #88 and #77). The facility failed to administer treatments on a consistent basis and failed to enter an order in the electronic medical record (EMR) for a newly identified wound for Resident #88. The facility failed to accurately document skin assessments for a resident with an ankle wound, so the facility and the Wound Doctor had the correct information to conduct wound follow-up and monitoring (Resident #77). The sample was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Wound Management Policy, dated January 2023, showed:-Policy: Manage resident skin integrity through prevention, assessment and implementations and evaluations of interventions.-Procedure:--The facility is provided with Wound Care Protocols. These are to be utilized to assist in the care and treatment of wounds. This reference tool can be placed in the nursing report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for one resident with frequent falls (Resident #26) and failed to ensure one resident was assessed for safety while smoking (Resident #15). The sample was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Fall Management policy, dated 3/28/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy of the management company to assess and manage resident falls through prevention, investigation, and implementation and evaluation of interventions;-Procedure: A fall risk assessment will be completed on all residents upon admission, re-admission, after each fall and quarterly thereafter. Residents identified as high risk will have fall prevention addressed on the plan of care. Review of the facility's Smoking policy, dated 10/21/22, showed:-Purpose: To ensure all residents are safe while smoking;-Procedure: Any resident that expresses an interest in smoking will be assessed at the time of admission and at least quarterly or with any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for catheter (a thin flexible tube inserted into the body to drain fluids (usually urine) or inject fluids/medication) care was obtained for one of one resident sampled with a catheter (Resident #2). The census was 81. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, dated 7/2017, showed:-Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections;-Maintain an accurate record of the resident's daily output, per facility policy and procedure;-Observe the resident for complications associated with urinary catheters. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/26/26, showed:-Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, legal blindness, dementia, and major depressive disorder;-Moderately impaired cognition. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of the survey, showed:-Problem: the resident has a suprapubic (a hollow tube inserted into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained the head of the bed in an elevated position during gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the abdomen used for liquid nutrition, fluids, and medications) feeding for one resident (Resident #5). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for complications, including aspiration (choking). The sample was 20. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Tube Feeding, Bolus (large amount given at one time) policy, revised 3/28/25, showed:-Policy: It is the policy that residents' nutritional needs will be met by a tube feeding, when oral consumption is not possible and the resident consents;-Maintain the head of the resident's bed at a minimum of 30 degrees. Review of the facility's Tube Feeding, Open System policy, dated 3/28/25, showed the policy did not address the position of the head of the bed while tube feeding is infusing. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #53). The sample was 20. The census was 81.Review of the facility's Laboratory Reports policy, last revised, July 2014, showed:-Policy: All lab reports will be reviewed by a nurse and reported to the physician as necessary;-Procedure: The night nurse will follow-up nightly through chart audit to ensure all labs have been performed as ordered, physician has been notified of results and reports are filed in the resident's record; If the nurse determines that a lab report has not been received, the nurse will obtain the lab results and notify the physician. Review of the facility's Obtaining and Following Physician orders, last revised, July 2017, showed:-Policy: Physician orders will be obtained by licensed personal and followed; If these orders are not followed by any reason, the physician and Director of Nursing (DON) will be promptly notified;-Procedure: If there is a new order, write the new order on the physician order sheet or entered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental care to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #10). The sample was 20. The census was 81.Review of facility's Dental Examination and Assessment policy, last revised, July 2014, showed:-Policy: Each resident shall undergo a dental assessment by facility nurses as part of the Nursing assessment process upon admission;-Policy interpretation: Prior to, or within 90 days after admission, the resident shall undergo a dental examination; Dental examinations will be made b the resident's personal dental dentist or by the facility's consulting dentist; Records of dental care provided shall be made a part of the resident's medical record; Upon conducting a dental examination, a resident needing dental services will be promptly referred to a dentist. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/9/26, showed:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-Requires set up and clean up assistance from staff for oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dietary supplement as ordered and failed to increase the dietary supplement as recommended by the dietitian for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) with weight loss. The census was 74.Review of the facility's policy on Weight Management Program, updated February 2025, showed the following:-Policy: It is the policy of Helia Healthcare to manage resident weight through prevention, assessment and implementation and evaluation of interventions;-Procedure: #12. The Minimum Data Set (MDS)/charge nurse will notify the physician of the resident's current condition and registered dietitian's recommendations, document the physician's order on the physician order sheet and the 24-hour report sheet. #13. The MDS/charge nurse will initiate a Diet Order and Communication form to the Dietary Manager who will chart the change in the dietary progress note and to the MDS Coordinator to update the care plan. Review of Resident #1's care plan, updated 8/5/25, showed the following:-Problem: Nutritional Deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2's change of condition (nose bleed) was properly assessed and documented across all shifts and failed to ensure physician orders were followed by not administering saline nasal spray at the prescribed time. The sample was six. The census was 79. Review of the facility's change in condition policy, dated 2/2012, showed: -Policy: It is the policy that resident change in condition will be assessed promptly and follow up activity will occur as appropriate and in a timely manner; -Definition: Change of condition is defined as an improvement or decline in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status that effects less than two areas of activities of daily living; -Procedure: The staff person who first notices the change reports the resident change in condition immediately to the licensed nurse. The licensed nurse assesses the resident including vital signs and notes signs and symptoms, regarding physical and mental changes in condition. The results of the assessment, including the vital signs, signs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans reflected current needs when staff failed to include speech therapy recommended choking strategies for one resident with a history of choking (Resident #1). The sample was five and issues were found with one. The census was 81. Review of the facility's Baseline Plan of Care policy, last revised 08/2017, showed: -The baseline care plan must reflect the resident's stated goals and objectives and include interventions that address his or her current needs. Because the baseline care plan documents the interim approaches for meeting the resident's immediate needs, professional standards of quality care would dictate that it must also reflect changes to approaches, as necessary. Facility staff must implement the interventions to assist the resident to achieve care plan goals and objective; -If the comprehensive assessment and comprehensive care plan identified a change in the resident's goals, or physical, mental, or psychosocial functioning, which are not identified in the baseline care plan, those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 75. Review of the facility's daily assignment sheets, showed there was no RN in the facility on 8/16, 8/17, 8/18, 8/20, 8/23, 8/27, 8/28 and 8/30/24, for a total of 8 out of 15 days. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 12:46 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the facility only had one RN on staff who worked full time. The ADON is aware the facility is required to have an RN in the facility for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. During an interview on 8/30/24 at 12:46 P.M., the Assistant Administrator (AA) was aware the facility has not had continuous RN coverage. He/She said they have been actively recruiting, offering a $5000.00 sign on bonus but have been unsuccessful. The AA said the facility had to have RN coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity when they failed to obtain proper Power of Attorney (POA, allows someone else to act on a resident's behalf) forms for two residents (Residents #2 and #1). The facility also failed to exercise patient rights of non-seclusion when they moved Resident #2 to a restricted environment without seeking alternative behavior interventions, assessments, or notifying a doctor. The sample size was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Policy: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity; -Residents had a right to be free from corporal punishment or involuntary seclusion, and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's symptoms; -The unauthorized release, access or disclosure of resident information is prohibited. All release, access, or disclosure of resident information must be in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care needs were met for dependent residents. The facility failed to provide perineal care (peri-care, washing the front and back of the hips, genitals, anal area and buttocks) timely and appropriately after an incontinence episode for one resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. The census was 77. Review of the facility Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting policy, revised March 2018, showed: -Policy statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene; -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living (ADLs) do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical condition(s) demonstrate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to control the presence of cockroaches in the facility when a cockroach was crawling on a resident's blanket while the resident was lying in his/her bed (Resident #1). This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 77. Review of pest control company service report, dated 8/19/24, showed: -Service provided: Roach clean out in the kitchen and in the rooms for roaches. This service will continue to reduce and eliminate German roaches (a small, tan to black cockroach commonly found indoors) throughout the area, kitchen, therapy room and the room; -Treated with an ultra-low volume sprayer to knock down German Roach infestation. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 5/29/24, showed: -Cognitively impaired; -Impairment on both sides of lower body; -Dependent for toileting and transfers; -Always incontinent of bladder and bowel; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by not retaining three years of grievance logs. The sample was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, undated, showed: -Evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances will be maintained for a period of no less than three years from the issuance of the grievance decision. Review on 5/6/24 at approximately 2:00 P.M., showed the grievance binder with grievance logs from January 2024 to current. There were no grievance logs for 2022 or 2023. During an interview on 5/7/24 at 10:25 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the facility had recently changed the process of how the grievances were logged. The facility had grievance logs from January 2024 to current. The ADON was unable to locate any other grievance binders. Grievance logs should be kept for a couple of years. During an interview on 5/7/24 at 1:47 P.M., the Administrator, the Director of Nursing, ADON and Regional Operational Director said they expected the facility to retain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide 24 hour protective oversight for two residents (Residents #42 and #53) with a history of elopements/wandering. The residents resided on a secured behavior unit and staff did not follow physician's orders to monitor the resident's wanderguard (electronic monitoring) devices as ordered, checking and documenting functionality of the wanderguards, when Resident #42 was discovered not wearing his/her wanderguard and Resident #53's wanderguard was not functioning. The facility also failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed for two residents (Residents #41 and #39) who smoked. The sample size was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility Elopement Policy and Procedure, undated, showed: -Monitoring of the Wander-guard System; -Each time a resident is assigned a wanderguard bracelet the resident's name, identification number of the bracelet, and the date activated will be documented on a log kept at the nurse's station. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 16 out of 92 days. This had the potential to cause unmet health needs for all residents. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Staffing policy, dated: 7/19, showed: Policy Statement: Our facility provides adequate staffing to meet needed care and services for our resident population; -Our facility maintains adequate staffing on each shift to ensure that our residents' needs and services are met. Licensed Registered Nursing and licensed nursing staff are available to provide and monitor the delivery of resident care services. Review of the facility's [NAME] Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (data collected by Center for Medicare and Medicare Services (CMS), dated fiscal quarter one, 2023, showed: -On 10/14, 10/15, 10/28, 10/29, 11/4, 11/5, 11/11, 11/12, 11/25, 11/26, 12/1, 12/3, 12/9, 12/10, 12/16 and 12/17/23, there was no RN coverage. During an interview on 5/6/24 at approximately 1:30 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility identified six medication/treatment carts and two medication rooms. Four of the six carts and one medication room were checked for medication storage. Issues were found in the three of four medication carts. Insulin pens were opened and dated more than 28 days. Multiple bottles of over the counter (OTC) medications were undated and expired. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated June 2020, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacture or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated drugs and those in containers, which are cracked, soiled or without secure closures will be immediately withdrawn from stock by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure code statuses were accurate, signed and updated in medical records for three of 18 sampled residents (Residents #52, #48 and #19). The census was 73. Review of the facility's Advance Directives policy, dated February 2012, showed: -Policy; -Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state and facility policy; -Procedure; -Prior to or upon admission of a resident to the facility, the Social Services Director or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate advance directives; -Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director or designee will inquire of the resident, and/or his/her family members, about the existence of any written advance directive; -Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-form CMS-10055) or a denial letter at the initiation, reduction, or termination of Medicare Part A benefits for two of two sampled residents who remained in the facility upon discharge from Medicare Part A services (Residents #44 and #34). The sample size was 18. The census was 73. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Survey and Certification memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed the following: -If the skilled nursing facility (SNF) believes on admission or during a resident's stay that Medicare will not pay for skilled nursing or specialized rehabilitative services and the provider believes that an otherwise covered item or service may be denied as not reasonable or necessary, the facility must inform the resident or his/her legal representative in writing why these specific services may not be covered and the beneficiary's potential liability for payment for the non-covered services. The SNF's responsibility to provide notice to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a mental disorder had a DA-124 Level I screen (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) used to evaluate for the presence of psychiatric conditions to determine if a PASARR Level II screen is required) as required, for three of eight residents sampled for the PASARR requirement (Residents #8, #41 and #3). The census was 73. 1. Review of Resident #8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 3/25/24, showed: -Date of admission on [DATE]; -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included seizures disorder, depression, dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of the resident's medical record, showed no PASARR Level I on file. During an interview on 5/6/24 at 1:50 P.M., the Corporate Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge, for one of three residents investigated for discharge (Resident #74). The census was 73. Review of Resident #74's medical record, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, depression and stroke; -discharged on 2/5/24. Review of the resident's progress notes, showed: -On 2/2/24 at 1:26 P.M., the nurse was informed by the Social Worker of resident needing a discharge order. The physician was at the facility today and given report on resident. Resident given order to discharge home and will be receiving services from Home Health. Appointment information given to resident's emergency contact. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Social Worker informed. Resident scheduled to discharge 2/5/24; -On 2/5/24 at 12:38 P.M., the resident discharged home with his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for two of 18 sampled residents who were dependent on staff for personal care (Residents #27 and #67). The census was 73. Review of the facility Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Policy, dated 1/2024, showed: -The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. This includes the resident's ability to; -Bathe, dress, and groom; -Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Conditions which may demonstrate unavoidable decline in ADLs include natural progression of the resident's disease state; - Deterioration of the resident's physical condition associated with the onset of a physical or mental disability while receiving care to restore or maintain functional abilities; -Refusal of care and treatment by the resident or his/her surrogate to maintain functional abilities; -A resident who-is-unable to carry out activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received routine dialysis (a treatment that helps remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) treatment had accurate physician's orders in place, consistent communication and a dialysis contract with the dialysis provider. This affected one of one resident sampled for dialysis review (Resident #41). The sample size was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility's Care of a Resident with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) policy, updated November 2017, showed: -Policy Statement; -Residents with ESRD will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation; -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents; -Education and training of staff includes, specifically; -The nature and clinical management of ESRD; -The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities observed, two errors occurred, resulting in a 7.41% error rate (Residents #44 and #20). The census was 73. Review of the Novolog FlexPen U-100 Insulin (rapid-acting insulin that helps lower mealtime blood sugar spikes in adults and children with diabetes) insulin pen injection; 100 unit per milliliters (unit/mL) (3 mL), manufacturer's instructions for use, revised 2/2023, showed: -Pull off the pen cap. Wipe the rubber stopper with an alcohol swab; -Remove the protective tab from a disposable needle. Screw the needle tightly onto the insulin pen. It is important that the needle is put on straight. Never place a disposable needle on the pen until ready for injection; -Pull off the big outer cap; -Pull off the inner needle cap and throw it away; -Before each injection small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. To avoid injecting air and ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection prevention and control when the facility failed to clean shared medical equipment between resident use with an approved Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered disinfectant for two sampled residents (Residents #44 and #20). In addition, staff failed to remove all gloves and perform hand hygiene when providing wound care for two of two residents sampled for wound care (Residents #14 and #69). The sample was 18. The census was 73. Review of the facility's glucometer's (a device for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood) manufacturer's instruction, showed: -Cleaning and disinfecting procedures for the meter: The meter should be cleaned and disinfected between each patient; -Cleaning Instructions: Cleaning is the removal of visible dirt and debris. Whenever your glucose meter is dirty, clean the outside of the meter with a new CaviWipes towelette (disposable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they followed their abuse and neglect policy by failing to conduct a thorough investigation into one resident's (Resident #3) allegation a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) slapped him/her in the face on the day shift of 1/18/24. The resident reported the allegation on 1/20/24. The facility initiated an investigation on 1/20/24, but failed to interview all staff from all departments that worked the day shift on 1/18/24. The census was 76. Review of the facility's Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy, dated 4/2022 and revised on 9/2022, showed: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed timeframes; -Compliance Guidelines: The facility will develop and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate immediate discharge notice to Resident #1 who was transported to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. An appeal was filed on behalf of the resident and the appeals unit determined the discharge notice failed to include the location to which the resident was being discharged to and the facility was ordered to allow the resident to return. The facility did not reevaluate the resident's status to determine if they were able to meet the residents needs after treatment and refused to readmit the resident back pending the appeal hearing. The census was 76. Review of the facility's Resident's Rights: What You Need to Know form, showed: -As a resident of a long-term care facility, you have rights that are guaranteed and protected by law. These residents' rights support the principles of dignity and respect. Every facility must protect and promote these rights for all residents; -Transfer and discharge: You can only be discharged from the facility if: There is a change in your medical needs. You…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of nursing practice, when staff failed to transcribe a treatment order for one of three residents identified with a pressure ulcer, resulting in the order not being followed for several days (Resident #2). The census was 76. Review of the facility's Wound Management Policy, updated 1/20/23, showed the following: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to manage resident skin integrity through prevention, assessment and implementation and evaluation of interventions; -Procedure: 1. Physician's order should be obtained and followed for each resident. 2. The facility will use the Braden Scale on each resident at admission, weekly for four weeks post admission and readmission and and quarterly to assess skin breakdown risk. 3. Residents identified at risk on the Braden Scale will have this addressed on their care plan and will have interventions put in place for preventative measure. High risk or residents with pressure ulcers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) narcotic pain medication was available and/or administered as ordered for one of 7 sampled residents (Resident #6). The facility failed to notify the resident's physician the narcotic pain medication needed a signed prescription and was not delivered. The census was 76. Review of the facility's policy on Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, undated, failed to address the Charge Nurse's responsibility when a controlled medication required a signed prescription. Review of Resident #6's hospital discharge record, dated 1/23/24, showed the following: -Diagnoses of lower extremity weakness, ankylosing spondylitis (inflammatory arthritis affecting the spine and large joints), lower extremity cellulitis, hamstring injury and hip osteoarthritis; -Discharge medications: Acetaminophen 500 milligrams (mg) 2 tablets every eight hours for pain and fever, Naproxen 500 mg one tablet twice a day with meals, oxycodone (narcotic pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an annual review of code status, full code (if the heart stops beating or breathing ceases, all life-saving methods are performed) or no code (do not resuscitate [DNR], no life prolonging methods are performed), for 9 of 24 sampled residents (Residents #47, #53, #56, #6, #75, #18, #1, #52 and #63). The facility also failed to ensure code status elections were available and accessible to staff in the electronic medical record. The census was 77. Review of the Communication of Code Status policy, dated 2/2022, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information; -Explanation and guidelines: -The facility will follow the policy regarding a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for one resident who sustained an injury of unknown origin due to not wearing a helmet and did not have physician's orders for a helmet (Resident #72). The facility failed to administer medications and treatment as ordered (Residents #56 and #1). The facility failed ensure an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) test was completed for one resident administered anti-psychotic medications (Resident #42). In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff document the administration of physician medications and treatments (Residents #9, #41, #46, #52, #79, and #49). The sample size was 24. The census was 77. Review of the facility's medication administration policy, dated February 2022, showed: -Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff are are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize recipes approved by a registered dietician (RD) for the residents' dietary needs and preferences and failed to obtain RD approval to ensure menu is of equal nutritive value after switching food items on the menu. The facility failed to have a system in place for food not in stock. The census was 77. 1. Review of the facility's regular menu, dated 10/17/22, showed: -Lunch: Beef barley casserole, corn, tossed salad, and red velvet cookie; -Dinner: Three bean soup, saltines, egg salad sandwich, and mixed melon salad. Observation on 10/17/22 at 11:47 A.M., showed the residents were served pork chops, augratin potatoes, green peas, and fruit crisp for lunch. 2. Review of the facility's regular menu, dated 10/18/22, showed: -Lunch: Roast pork, scalloped potatoes, and lima beans; -Dinner: Chicken and broccoli pot pie and red bliss potatoes. Observation on 10/18/22 at 11:55 A.M., showed the residents were served roast pork with gravy, lima beans, and scalloped potatoes for lunch. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a complete and thorough facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The census was 77. Review of the facility's facility's assessment policy, dated August 2022, showed: -Policy: This facility conducts and documents a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day to day operation and emergencies. The purpose of this policy is to establish responsibilities and procedures for the facility assessment process; -The facility's assessment will, at a minimum, address or include: -The care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity and other pertinent facts that are present within that population; -The staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population; -The facility's resources, including but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and readily accessible in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility implemented a new electronic medical records (EMR) system on October 1, 2022, which failed to transfer all of the residents' medical records, leaving portions of the residents' EMR inaccessible to staff. This affected all residents admitted to the facility prior to October 1, 2022 (Residents #4, #13, #18, #1, #55, #41, #38, #43, #42, #46, #47, #49, #52, #59, #79 and #81). The sample size was 24. The census was 77. 1. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/2/2, showed: -Rarely understood; -Required extensive assistance of one person with transfers; -Total dependence of one person with dressing and hygiene. -Diagnoses included anemia, high blood pressure, cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or responsible parties were notified in a timely manner when a resident's account was within the $200 Social Security (SSI) limit ($5,301.85) or when the resident's account was over the SSI limit ($5,301.85). This affected 6 residents reviewed who received Medicaid benefits (Residents #2, #35, #77, #38, #39 and #58). The census was 77. Review of the facility's undated admission Agreement, showed the facility shall notify each resident that receives Medicaid benefits when the amount of the resident's account reaches $200.00 less than the SSI resource limit for one person and if the amount in the account is addition to the value of the resident's other nonexempt resources, reaches the SSI resource limit for one person, the resident may lose eligibility for Medicaid or SSI. 1. Review of Resident #2's trust account, showed: -On 9/30/22, he/she had $5,859.00 in his/her account; -No letter showing the facility notified the resident or responsible party that he/she was within $200 of the SSI limit or over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure protection of resident funds. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Resident Trust General Ledger (cash sheet) for the period of September 2021 through September 2022, showed an average monthly balance of $132,000.00, which would require a bond of $150,000.00. Review of the Department of Health and Senior Services' approved bond list, showed the facility had an approved bond for $100,000.00. During an interview on 10/19/22 at 11:40 A.M., the Business Office Manager said he/she was aware that the bond was not enough. He/she provided an email he/she sent to the paralegal department of the prior owners on 7/19/22; however, he/she did not find a response to the email. The bond was increased on 9/30/22 to $150,000.00. During an interview on 10/21/22 at 10:29 A.M., the administrator said he expected the bond to cover the resident trust. He said the bond was increased on 9/30/22.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nine of nine certified nurse aides (CNAs) received the required annual 12 hour resident care training. The census was 77. Review of the CNA individual service records, showed the following: -CNA G hired 1/18/21, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA H hired 3/15/16, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA I hired 10/25/21, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA J hired 7/14/16, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA K hired 8/19/17, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA L hired 2/19/17, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA M hired 7/18/21, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA N hired 2/24/21, with six hours of in-service education; -CNA O hired 2/18/98, with six hours of in-service education. Review of the undated written statement provided by the administrator, received 10/17/22, showed the facility was unable to receive calculated hours for any of the staff members. Due to accounts not set up properly with prior ownership caused hardship of not having needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for two of two carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 77. Review of the controlled substance administration and accountability policy, dated 2/2022, showed: -Policy: to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion and accidental exposure; -Explanation and guidelines: -All controlled substances are accounted for in one of the following ways: -All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided; -The charge nurse or other designee conducts a daily visual audit of the required documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities for error, five errors occurred resulting in a 20% medication error rate (Residents #49, #46, and #15). The census was 77. Review of the medication administration policy, dated 6/2022, showed: -Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so, as ordered by physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection; -Explanation and guidelines: -Review medication administration record (MAR) to identify medication to be administered; -Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time; -Remove medication from source, taking care not to touch medication with bare hand. 1. Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medication by not keeping the treatment cart locked, by not disposing of expired medications, by not properly labeling insulin pens and vials, and by not properly disposing medications by leaving a paper bag full of medications in the medication room. The census was 77. Review of the Medication Storage policy, dated 2/2022, included: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. -General Guidelines: -All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. -Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. -During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. -Unused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment and food related items in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination and outdated use. In addition, the facility failed to have a policy on handling, storing, and labeling food and cleaning kitchen equipment. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 77. 1. Observation on 10/17/22 at 11:47 A.M., showed: -Double refrigerator showed one opened container of thickened lemon flavored water, one opened container of golden fruit punch, and one opened container of orange juice. There was no date on the containers. The back of the containers showed to use up to seven days after opening; -Walk in refrigerator showed a box filled with thawed strawberry and chocolate health shakes. There was no date labeled. The back of the health shake showed to use within 14 days in the refrigerator; -The range hood above the stove, fryer and food warmer showed chipped paint above. The paint pieces were approximately 1 inch to 3 inches hanging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-21 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to produce an on-site policy regarding the acceptance, usage and storage of foods brought into the facility for residents by family and other visitors, to ensure the food's safe and sanitary handling and consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate food brought in by visitors. The census was 77. Review of the facility's policies provided, showed no documentation of a policy regarding foods brought in for residents by family and other visitors. During an interview on 10/21/22 at 8:25 A.M., the dietary manager said there is no policy for food brought in by visitors; however, the families are aware of the resident's diet. The staff also check the food as well. During an interview on 10/21/22 at 10:29 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding food brought in by visitors. He would expect the facility to have a policy to address the handling of food brought in by visitors.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care to residents to prevent the spread of infection and provide a safe and sanitary environment for two residents (Residents #22 and #49) when staff did not change gloves during care and failed to appropriately clean dirty bandage scissors prior to use (Resident #52). The census was 77. Review of the Infection and Control Program policy, dated 8/2022, showed: -Policy: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines; -Explanation and compliance guidelines: -All staff are responsible for following all policies and procedures related to the program; -Standard precautions: -All staff shall assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's self-determination through support of resident choices when staff failed to follow a resident's choice to be a no code (do not resuscitate [DNR], no life prolonging methods are performed), when staff performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) when the resident was found not breathing and without a pulse, (Resident #82). The sample size was 24. The census was 77. Review of the Communication of Code Status policy, dated 2/2022, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information; -Explanation and guidelines: -The facility will follow the policy regarding a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was maintained in good repair. The census was 77. Observations on the 500 hall secured unit, on 10/16/22 through 10/21/22, during the survey, showed the following: -Inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], a bedside table, next to sink, with a portion of the veneer top missing. The remaining piece of veneer was elevated from the table base, with its jagged edges of broken veneer exposing the top of the wooden table underneath; -Inside room [ROOM NUMBER], the closet to the left of the entrance to the room, a closet door was missing. The resident room sink vanity, of the eight vanity drawers, five were missing, and two broken vanity drawers fronts sat underneath the sink; -Inside room [ROOM NUMBER], the resident room sink vanity, of its eight drawer vanity, one drawer was missing; -Inside room [ROOM NUMBER], the entrance door's knob was hanging, partially attached to the door. The resident room sink vanity, of the eight vanity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #59) was free from exploitation of property when a staff person admitted to borrowing $100 from the resident then refused to return the money. The census was 77. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, implemented 2/2022, included: -It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Review of Resident #59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Independent with bed mobility and eating; -Required limited assistance with transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -Diagnoses include diabetes, depression, traumatic brain injury (TBI, an injury that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS, the State Survey Agency) an allegation of abuse and an injury of unknown origin for two sampled residents (Residents #52 and #72). The sample was 24. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy, dated 4/27/22, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed timeframes; -Injuries of unknown source: Includes circumstances when both the following conditions are met: -The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident; -The injury is suspicious because of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to thoroughly and timely investigate alleged violations for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect investigations. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident to resident altercation (Resident #52 and Resident #4). The census was 77. Review of the facility's Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation policy, dated 4/27/22, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed timeframes; -Injuries of unknown source: Includes circumstances when both the following conditions are met: -The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the urinary tract to drain urine) had current physician orders for their indwelling urinary catheter. Facility staff also failed to monitor the resident's output and perform catheter care as ordered, and failed to address the catheter use on the resident's current care plan. The resident developed a urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility identified one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The one resident was sampled and problems were identified with that resident (Resident #52). The census was 77. Review of the facility's Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal policy, dated 2/2022, included: -If an indwelling catheter is in use, the facility will provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with currently professional standards of practice and resident care policies and procedures that include but are not limited to: -Timely and appropriate assessments related to the indication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) center for one of two residents who received dialysis (Resident #18). The census was 77. Review of the facility Hemodialysis Policy, dated 1/2022, showed: - Policy: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis; -Purpose: The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis and/or peritoneal dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include: -The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors on a daily basis. The census was 77. Observations from 10/16 22 through 10/21/22, showed the facility did not post the nurse staff sheet in a prominent place, readily visible and accessible to residents and visitors. There was no information that contained the facility name, date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: number of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nurse aides, and the resident census. During an interview on 10/21/22 at 10:29 A.M., the administrator and the Director Of Nursing said they had posted the nurse hours; however, they were painting the lobby, so it was not put back up. The Administrator expected the nurse hours to be posted daily in the visible area.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs by failing to complete a gradual dose reduction (GDR) and failing to ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications were administered for the intended use and limited to 14 days for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #46, #47 and #52). In addition, the facility failed to monitor hypnotic medication used to treat insomnia (Resident #46). The sample size was 24. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Use of Psychotropic Medication policy, implemented 2/2022, included: -Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication; -Residents and/or representatives shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow their puree recipes for two of two purees observed which affected five of five residents receiving pureed diets. In addition, the facility did not have a policy regarding pureed diets. The census was 77. Observation and interview on 10/19/22 at 9:10 A.M., showed dietary aide S added canned, diced carrots to the food blender. He/she poured an unmeasured amount of hot water into a small container and poured the hot water into the blender. He/she did not measure the water before adding it to the blender. Dietary aide S said the amount of water added depended on the consistency of the carrots. If it was too thick, he/she would add more water. He/she also added Italian seasoning for flavor. The carrots were blended together until it had an applesauce consistency. Observation and interview on 10/19/22 at 9:20 A.M., showed dietary aide S added an unmeasured amount of chicken to the blender. He/she added two slices of bread and an unmeasured amount of hot water from a small container. Dietary aide S said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, unless documentation showed the vaccine was medically contraindicated, refused or the resident was already immunized by failing to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to three residents of 5 residents sampled for the pneumococcal vaccine (Residents #12, #13 and #49). The census was 77. Review of the facility Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) policy, dated implemented 1/2022, showed: -It is our policy to offer our residents, staff, and volunteer workers immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: -Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission. Self-report of immunization shall be accepted. Any additional efforts to obtain information shall be documented, including efforts to determine date of immunization or type of vaccine received; -Each resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,949 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,949 — penalty dated 2024-12-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PALLADIAN HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MILLER, STEPHENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 10/01/2022
JACKSON, THOMASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/21/2023
MILLS, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$323K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 6%Other / private 8%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,698per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$226per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265736. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next