Sapphire Ridge Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 104.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to date open containers of nutritional supplements and failed to remove nutritional supplements stored past the use by date in 2 of 3 nourishment room refrigerators (North and South Units). This practice had the potential to affect residents receiving nutritional supplements.Findings included:Observations of the nourishment room refrigerators on the North and South Units conducted on 05/06/26 at 10:29 AM through 10:41 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed:a. Stored in the North Unit nourishment room refrigerator was a one-quart sized nutritional shake with no date to indicate when it was opened. The manufacturer's label on the container read, use within 4 days after opening if refrigerated.b. Stored in the South Unit nourishment room refrigerator were two one-quart sized nutritional shakes dated 4/24 and 4/28. The manufacturer's label on the containers read, use within 4 days after opening if refrigerated. Also stored was one opened and undated 8-ounce sized diabetic nutritional shake. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) determination for a resident who was admitted to the facility with a serious mental health disorder for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #11).Findings included:A PASRR Determination Notification letter dated 10/27/25 revealed Resident #11 had a Level I PASRR with no expiration date.Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and vascular dementia with severe behavioral disturbance.A psychiatric progress note dated 10/29/25 revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility from another facility and per the records received from the previous facility, she had a history of bipolar disorder for many years and recent behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD, refers to non-cognitive symptoms and behaviors such as agitation, aggression, anxiety,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with denture care for 1 of 4 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #100).Findings included:Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #100's cognition was severely impaired, setup or clean-up assistance was needed with oral hygiene, had no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous), and had no rejection of care or behaviors during the lookback period.A review of the Nurse Aide (NA) documentation for oral care/denture care revealed from 04/07/26 through 05/05/26 denture care was documented as provided three times for Resident #100 on 04/14/26, 04/25/25, and 04/26/26.The care plan dated 04/19/26 revealed Resident #100 was at risk for oral and dental health problems related to being edentulous and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on an observation of the lunch meal tray preparation, record review, and interviews with the Dietary Manager and staff, the facility failed to provide the correct portion size of beef hamburger steak for residents receiving a mechanically altered diet. This failure had the potential to affect 18 of 97 residents who received a lunch meal tray with a mechanically altered diet. Findings included: The facility's diet consistency census report dated 03/03/25 revealed 18 of 97 residents received a mechanically altered diet. The facility's planned menu for Wednesday (03/05/25) listed beef hamburger steak as the protein being served for lunch. The portion size listed on the menu indicated each plate received one beef hamburger steak. The beef hamburger steak packaging revealed each steak was a 4-ounce portion. A continuous observation of lunch trays being prepared for residents was conducted on 03/05/25 at 11:54 AM through 1:38 PM. The Dietary Manager served one (4 ounce) beef hamburger steak for residents that received a regular diet. The Dietary Manager and [NAME] used a ladle with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve the lunch meal at the posted times on 03/05/25 and 03/06/25 in the main dining room during 2 of 3 meal observations. The findings included: Review of the facility's meal times schedule revealed lunch was to be served in the main dining room at 12:30 PM. a. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #54 had severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate assistance with eating and received a mechanically altered diet. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #101 had severe cognitive impairment, required setup or cleanup assistance with eating and received a mechanically altered diet. An observation of the lunch meal service in the main dining room on 03/05/25 at 1:10 PM revealed residents were seated at various tables eating their lunch.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to remove food items stored and available for use that had signs of spoilage or were past the expiration date from the walk-in refrigerator and dry goods storage area located in the kitchen. The facility also failed to date an opened container of nectar thick milk stored in the nutrition refrigerator used for residents on the memory care unit for 1 of 2 nutrition refrigerators. This deficient practice had the potential to affect food and beverages served to residents. Findings included: The initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 3/3/25 at 7:55 AM revealed the following: 1a. A container of enchilada sauce with an expiration date 01/2024 stored in the walk-in refrigerator and available for use. b. A container of sliced lemons with a white, slimy discoloration with a use by date 2/28/25 stored in the walk-in refrigerator and available for use. c. A container of sliced bananas mixed with pineapple tidbits with the slices of banana that had turned brown to black in color. The use by date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to include documentation in the medical record of refusal or acceptance of influenza and pneumonia vaccinations for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #20, Resident #44, Resident #37, Resident #80, and Resident #62) reviewed for immunizations and failed to assess the eligibility to receive the influenza and pneumonia vaccines for 2 of 5 (Resident #44 and Resident #37). Findings included: 1. (a). Resident #20 was admitted to the facility 04/06/23. Review of an unsigned Vaccine Declination Form dated 08/01/24 for influenza and pneumonia vaccines revealed multiple attempts to contact Resident #20's Power of Attorney (POA) were unsuccessful. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #20 was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS reflected Resident #20 had not received the influenza or pneumonia vaccine. Review of Resident #20's electronic medical record revealed the Vaccine Declination Form dated 08/01/24 was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to include documentation in the medical record of refusal or acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #20, Resident #44, Resident #37, Resident #80, and Resident #62) reviewed for immunizations and failed to assess the eligibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: 1. (a). Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of an unsigned Vaccine Declination Form dated 08/01/24 for COVID-19 revealed multiple attempts to contact Resident #20's Power of Attorney (POA) were unsuccessful. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #20 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #20's electronic medical record revealed the Vaccine Declination Form dated 08/01/24 was not included in her medical record. (b). Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Vaccine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for a dependent resident seated at a table in the main dining room waiting to be served and assisted with his lunch while watching other residents in the main dining room receive and eat their lunch for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #49). The reasonable person concept was applied to this deficiency as an individual might feel forgotten or experience frustration at not being able to eat while watching others receive and eat their meals. Findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side and vascular dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had severe cognitive impairment. He had impairment on one side of both the upper and lower extremities and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to honor a resident's preference for twice weekly showers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #104). Findings included: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #104's cognition was moderately impaired, she had limited range of motion affecting one side of the upper extremity, and bathe/shower was not applicable and not attempted. A review of the shower assignment revealed Resident #104's showers were scheduled on Tuesday and Friday. There was no documented shower sheets to indicate a bed bath or shower was provided on 02/25/25 (Tuesday) or 02/28/25 (Friday). A shower sheet dated 03/04/25 revealed Resident #104 had received one shower since admission on [DATE]. During an interview and observation on 03/03/25 at 2:36 PM Resident #104 revealed she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,568 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,568 — penalty dated 2023-11-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASCENT HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC