No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Orchard Valley Health and Rehabilitation

200 Heritage Circle, Hendersonville, NC 28791 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (828) 693-5849 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (828) 693-5849 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,452 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,452 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
125 Vance Hill Dr · (828) 891-7522 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens2.9 mi
1707 Brevard Rd · (828) 697-0507 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
125 Industrial Park Rd · (828) 693-0711 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Patton Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.0%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.3%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.6%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%5.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.3%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%14.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.3%78.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.5%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.941.781.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.521.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

30.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF30.4%CMS range 20.5–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.5–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
73.5%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 101.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, Law Enforcement Corporal, and Medical Doctor (MD) interviews, the facility failed to protect a [AGE] year old female resident with severe cognitive impairment (Resident #2) from sexual abuse by a [AGE] year old male resident with moderate impairment in cognition (Resident #1) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #1 was observed with his shorts/boxers pulled down lying in bed next to and behind Resident #2, whose gown was pulled up exposing her breasts and her brief pulled down between her legs, with the perceived intention of engaging in sexual activity. Based upon the reasonable person concept, a person in Resident #2's position would have expected to be protected from abuse in their home environment and non-consensual sexual activity would have caused psychosocial harm and trauma such as feelings of fear, anxiety and humiliation. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinsonism, Post Traumatic Stress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the areas of hospice (specialized care focused on nearing the end of life) (Resident #29, Resident #62, and Resident #77) and preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR, a program ensuring residents with certain diagnoses received specialty services) (Resident #10) for 4 of 30 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings included: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility 10/20/23. Review of a hospice recertification note dated 12/15/25 revealed Resident #29 was initially admitted to hospice on 06/24/25 and was recertified to receive services from 12/21/25 through 02/18/26. Review of Resident #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] did not indicate she was receiving hospice services. An interview with the Regional MDS Consultant on 02/19/26 at 1:42 PM revealed Resident #29's quarterly MDS assessment should have reflected that she was receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a bed with enough length to prevent a resident's feet from pressing against the footboard for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #48).Findings included:Resident #48 was admitted to the facility 03/26/25 with diagnoses including incomplete quadriplegia C5-C7 (spinal cord injury between the 5th cervical vertebrae and the 7th cervical vertebrae resulting in loss of some motor functions but not all), and chronic pain due to trauma. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Resident #48 was dependent on staff assistance with self-care tasks, bed mobility and transfers. It was noted Resident #48 had a height of 73 inches.During an observation and interview on 02/16/26 at 11:51 AM, Resident #48 was observed sitting up in bed watching television. The head of the bed was raised approximately 30 degrees. Resident #48's head was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, referring to the last day of the observation period) for 3 of 30 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed (Residents #10, #47 and #108). Findings included:a. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #10's electronic medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an ARD of 09/29/25 that was marked as completed on 10/22/25.b. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #47's electronic medical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 11/15/25 that was marked as completed on 12/04/25.c. Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #108's electronic medical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 11/07/25 that was marked as completed on 12/02/25.During a joint interview on 02/19/26 at 1:42 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident who was admitted to the facility with mental health disorders for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #11).The findings included:A PASRR Determination Notification letter dated 02/03/16 revealed Resident #11 had a Level I PASRR with no expiration date. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder.Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #11 was not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Resident #11's active psychiatric/mood disorder diagnosis included anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Resident #11 took antianxiety medications. Review of a Psychiatric Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) reevaluation after a significant change in physical or mental status was identified for residents previously determined to have a Level II PASRR. This deficient practice affected 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents #28 and #31).Findings included:a. Resident #28 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and anxiety disorder.A PASRR Level II determination notification letter dated 05/05/20 revealed Resident #28 had a Level II PASRR with no expiration date and nursing facility placement was appropriate.A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or other related conditions. Resident #28's active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with the Medical Director, Registered Dietitian and staff, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements according to the physician's diet order for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident #90).Findings included:Resident #90 was admitted to the facility 09/24/24 with diagnoses including vascular dementia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition.Resident #90 had an order dated 06/11/25 for fortified pudding after lunch for weight stability. Resident #90 had an order dated 12/02/25 for a frozen nutritional cup two times per day for weight stability. Resident #90's weight record revealed he weighed 154.4 pounds on 12/10/25.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had severely impaired cognition, was independent for eating meals, had no swallowing disorders, weighed 154 pounds, and documented weight loss of five percent or more in the last month or loss of ten percent or more in the last six months…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete bed rail assessments to determine the need for bed rail use and failed to obtain informed consent prior to installation for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #47 and #53).Findings Included:a. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His cumulative diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), muscle weakness, and chronic pain.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had intact cognition and range of motion impairment on both sides of the lower extremities. The MDS assessment noted Resident #47 required supervision or touching assistance with bed mobility, was independent with moving from a sitting-to-lying position and bed rails were not used as a physical restraint.During an observation on 02/16/26 at 2:30 PM, Resident #47 was lying in bed sleeping soundly. A bed grab bar was observed secured to the bedframe and in the upright…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews with the Speech Therapist and staff, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect the current diet as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident #1). The findings including: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. He required partial to moderate assistance with eating, and no signs or symptoms of a swallowing disorder were noted. The care plan last revised on 4/23/25 indicated Resident #1 received a regular diet with thin liquids and included the intervention to provide the diet as ordered by the physician. A review of Resident #1's active physician orders included provide a mechanical soft diet and nectar thick liquids for overt signs and symptoms of aspiration (inhaling food or fluids into the lungs) dated 05/27/25. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews with the Speech Therapist and staff, the facility failed to provide fluids of a nectar thick consistency as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1's cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #1 had upper extremity impairment on both sides, needed partial to moderate assistance with eating, and had no signs or symptoms of a swallowing disorder. The care plan dated 04/23/25 indicated Resident #1 received a regular diet with thin liquids. Interventions included provide diet as ordered. A review of the physician's diet order dated 05/27/25 revealed Resident #1 was downgraded from a regular diet to a mechanical soft consistency and nectar thick liquids for overt signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the meal service tray line, record review, and dietary staff, Registered Dietician (RD), and the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) interviews, the facility failed to provide all food items as specified by the approved menu and failed ensure residents received the correct portion sizes based on the approved menu. These practices had the potential to affect 77 residents receiving a regular diet, 18 residents receiving a mechanical soft diet (consisting of foods that are easy to swallow), and 8 residents receiving a puree diet (consisting of foods with a pudding-like texture). Findings included: 1. An observation of the lunch meal tray line on 12/02/24 at 12:32 PM revealed the shepherd's pie being served to residents receiving a regular or mechanical soft diet consisted of a layer of ground beef, a layer of mashed potatoes, and a layer of melted cheese. No additional serving of vegetables was provided. A review of the recipe with the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) and Dietary Manager on 12/02/24 at 12:33 PM revealed the recipe for 100 servings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a clean floor in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler, 1 of 1 walk-in freezer, 1 of 1 dry storage rooms, and 1 of 1 kitchen; label and date open food items and discard expired food in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and 2 of 2 reach-in coolers; cover and date open food items in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and 1 of 1 reach-in cooler; date milkshakes to identify their use-by date in 1 of 1 reach-in cooler; maintain clean shelves on 5 prep tables in 1 of 1 kitchen; discard expired bread in 1 of 1 kitchen; and maintain clean refrigerators and freezers in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms (200 hall and 300 hall). This failure had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. An initial observation of the walk-in cooler, walk-in freezer, walk-in storage, and kitchen floor on 12/02/24 at 9:42 AM revealed multiple dried yellow and brown stains on the floor of the walk-in cooler, multiple dried black stains on the walk-in freezer floor, scattered dried brown stains on the floor of the dry storage room and surveyor's shoes stuck to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 6. An observation of the dresser of room [ROOM NUMBER]-B on 12/02/24 at 11:32 AM revealed an area of missing wood to the top of the dresser on the side closest to the bed, leaving an exposed sharp corner. Additional observations of the dresser of room [ROOM NUMBER]-B on 12/03/24 at 8:55 AM, on 12/04/23 at 7:42 AM, and 12/05/24 at 7:34 AM revealed an area of missing wood to the top of the dresser on the side closest to the bed, leaving an exposed sharp corner. An interview with the Maintenance Director on 12/04/24 at 10:57 AM revealed he was not aware of the top of the dresser in room [ROOM NUMBER]-B having missing wood resulting in a sharp corner being exposed. He stated he relied on nursing staff to notify him of rough edges on furniture since he was busy working on other projects. The Maintenance Director stated the dresser would need to be replaced. An interview with the Administrator on 12/05/24 at 5:12 PM revealed he expected furniture to be in good repair or be replaced. 7. An observation of the overbed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the Regional Ombudsman when residents discharged or transferred from the facility for 6 of 6 months (April 2024, July 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, and November 2024). Findings included: Review of the facility's Admission/Discharge report for the period 04/01/24 to 04/30/24 revealed there were 25 residents who were discharged home, transferred to the hospital, or transferred to another nursing facility. Review of the facility's Admission/Discharge report for the period 07/01/24 to 11/30/24 revealed there were 125 residents who were discharged home, transferred to the hospital, or transferred to another nursing facility. During an interview on 12/06/24 at 3:52 PM, the Administrator stated he was unable to find any documentation that notifications of residents' discharges/transfers were sent to the Regional Ombudsman for the months of April 2024, July 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024 or November 2024. He explained that the Admissions Director was the one who was previously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, referring to the last day of the assessment period) (Residents #6, #16, #21, #28, #29, #47, #68, and #78) and failed to comprehensively complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA) for Resident #89 for 9 of 45 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed an annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 01/20/24 that was marked as completed on 02/26/24. During a joint interview on 12/04/24 at 12:43 PM, MDS Nurse #1, MDS Nurse #2 and MDS Nurse #3 all verified Resident #6's annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 01/20/24 was not completed within the regulatory time frame. b. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #16's electronic medical record revealed an annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 01/26/24 that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, referring to the last day of the observation period) for 14 of 45 sampled residents (Residents #6, #15, #16, #21, #28, #29, #42, #47, #48, #68, #78, #81, #83, and #85). Findings included: a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed the following: -A quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 04/19/24 that was marked as completed on 06/29/24. -A quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 07/19/24 that was marked as completed on 08/21/24. -A quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 07/29/24 that was marked as completed on 08/21/24. During a joint interview on 12/04/24 at 12:43 PM, MDS Nurse #1, MDS Nurse #2 and MDS Nurse #3 all verified Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessments with ARDs of 04/19/24, 07/19/24 and 07/29/24 were not completed within the regulatory time frame. b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-06 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Medical Director (MD) and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were performed every 30 days for the first 90 days of admission for 4 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for physician visits (Residents #21, #31, #41, and #55). Findings included: a. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (trouble breathing), heart failure, and respiratory failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #21 had moderate impairment in cognition. Review of Resident 21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was seen by the Medical Doctor (MD) on 06/14/24 and 08/26/24 during the first ninety (90) days of his admission to the facility. b. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues), heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite residents to participate and provide input in care planning for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #50 and #11). Findings included: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic pain, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #50's electronic medical record revealed no evidence she was invited to attend care plan meetings to discuss and provide input regarding her plan of care following the completion of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] or the quarterly MDS assessment 09/13/24. The comprehensive care plan for Resident #50 was last revised on 08/14/24. During an interview on 12/03/24 at 8:49 AM, Resident #50 stated she had not been invited to attend or had a care plan meeting scheduled since June 2024. During interviews on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident could access a light switch located at the left side of her bed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #91). The findings included: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #91 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS coded Resident #91 with impairment of one side of lower extremity and walking between locations inside the room for more than 10 feet was not attempted during the assessment period due to medical condition or safety concerns. During an observation conducted on 12/02/24 at 1:09 PM, the switch for the light fixture on the left side of Resident #91's bed 5 feet from the floor was attached with a cord 3 inches in length. Resident #91 was unable to reach the switch cord from the bed if needed. An interview was conducted with Resident #91 on 12/02/24 at 1:13 PM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives throughout the medical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #65). Findings included: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #65's advanced directive care plan, initiated on 07/15/21, with the most recent revision on 03/26/2024 had Resident #65 Care planned as a Full Code. Care Plan Goal listed as: Resident's advanced directives are in effect and their wishes and directions will be carried out in accordance with their advanced directives. Interventions included: Allow resident if able to discuss feelings regarding their Advanced Directives, An Advanced Directive can be revoked or changed if the resident and or appointed Health Care Representative changes their mind about the medical care they want delivered, Complete and update MOST form as needed. Honor residents and family wishes. Review advance directives at least quarterly and PRN. The appointed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician when a urinalysis was not completed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of change (Resident #38). The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included bacteremia. Resident #38 had a physician's order for a urinalysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity for urinary pain one time only for one day. This was ordered on 9/24/2024 and marked completed on 9/25/2024. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) for September 2024 revealed the UA was documented as completed on 9/25/2024. Review of the lab results revealed that there were no results for the UA ordered on 9/24/2024 for Resident #38. A phone interview on 12/06/2024 at 9:54 AM with Nurse #6 revealed revealed that she had completed and collected the UA specimen for Resident #38 on 9/25/2024 and placed it in the refrigerator for the lab to collect. She stated that if the specimen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and procedure by not immediately reporting an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse to the Administrator for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #11). Findings included: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised 03/02/23, read in part: all alleged violations will be reported to the Administrator within specified timeframes: a) Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #11 with intact cognition. Review of the staff progress notes for Resident #11 revealed an entry written by Nurse #4 on 04/08/24 at 6:49 AM with an effective date of 04/06/24 that read, Resident reports that another male resident came to her room, touched her on the thighs at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) before the expiration date and failed to develop comprehensive care plans that incorporated Level II PASRR determination for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #21 and #104). Findings included: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder. A PASRR Level II Determination Notification letter dated [DATE] for Resident #21 had an expiration date of [DATE]. It was noted nursing facility placement was appropriate for a limited nursing facility stay lasting no more than thirty calendar days. A PASRR Level II Determination Notification letter dated [DATE] for Resident #21 had an expiration date of [DATE]. It was noted nursing facility placement was appropriate for a 90 day period with specialized services that consisted of psychiatric services provided by a Psychiatrist and rehabilitative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a discharge planning process in place that incorporated the resident in the development of a discharge care plan that addressed the resident's discharge goals and post-discharge needs for residents who wished to discharge to the community for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #50 and #70). Findings included: 1. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic pain, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. The MDS noted there was no active discharge plan in place and Resident #50 wanted to be asked about returning to the community on all MDS assessments. A Discharge Planning Review at Admission/readmission assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #50's discharge goal was to return to the community. Under the summary section it was noted in part that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner, and staff the facility failed to obtain a blood sugar as part of the change of condition assessment for a resident with a current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus that was being treated with routine oral blood glucose lowering medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a change of condition (Resident #205). The findings included: Resident #205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. Review of the 5-day/discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #205's cognition was moderately impaired, and medications received included a hypoglycemic. The baseline care plan dated 2/7/24 identified Resident #205's level of consciousness as being alert and intact. A physician's order revealed glipizide-metformin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels) oral tablet 2.5-500 milligrams (mg) was started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a Nurse Aide (NA #8) transferred a resident safely for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. Findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility 12/12/15 with diagnoses including muscle spasm and lack of coordination. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and had impaired range of motion to one side of her upper extremities and impaired range of motion to both lower extremities. The MDS indicated Resident #4 was dependent for chair/bed transfers. Review of the activities of daily living (ADL) care plan last updated 09/20/24 revealed Resident #4 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required a mechanical lift with 2-person assistance for transfers. Review of Resident #4's [NAME] (a document that gives a brief overview of the care each resident requires) last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with the resident and staff the facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter tubing was secured to the leg to prevent movement and trauma for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident #87). Findings included: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including obstructive and reflux uropathy (obstruction of urine from bladder and a backwards flow). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87's cognition was moderately impaired with no rejection of care behaviors during the lookback period. An indwelling urinary catheter was in place and setup or clean up assistance was needed for toileting hygiene. A review of Resident #87's current physician's order to secure the indwelling catheter tubing using an anchoring device to prevent movement and urethral traction every shift was initiated on 10/02/24. The care plan last revised on 11/19/24 identified Resident #87 had an indwelling catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and Consultant Pharmacist, Medical Director, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic eye drops were received from the pharmacy as ordered which resulted in five (5) missed doses for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy services (Resident #11). Findings included: Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included chronic conjunctivitis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate impairment in cognition. A Physician Order Sheet dated 11/20/24 and signed by the Ophthalmologist read, start Moxifloxacin eye drops - one drop twice a day, OD (right eye). Do not stop, continuous. Review of Resident #11's active physician orders revealed an order dated 11/21/24 for Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride (HCI) Ophthalmic Solution (antibiotic used to treat eye infections caused by bacteria) 0.5% - one drop in right eye two times a day for irritation. No stop date per Ophthalmology.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and Medical Director, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when they failed to administer antibiotic eye drops as prescribed by the physician. As a result, Resident #11 missed 5 doses of antibiotic eye drops. This affected 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #11). The findings included: Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included chronic conjunctivitis. A Family Nurse Practitioner progress note dated 08/19/24 revealed in part, Resident #11 had right eye conjunctivitis with chronic right eye redness and drainage that worsened intermittently. The FNP noted Resident #11 had been treated with multiple courses of antibiotic eye drops and the plan was to schedule an appointment with the Ophthalmologist for further management of ongoing symptoms. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate impairment in cognition. A Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete an ordered Urinalysis for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for laboratory services (Resident #38). The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included bacteremia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #38 was cognitively intact. Resident #38 had a physician's order for a urinalysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity one time only for 1 day. This was ordered on 9/24/2024 and marked completed on 9/25/2024. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) for September 2024 revealed the UA was documented as completed on 9/25/2024. Review of the lab results revealed that there were no results for the UA ordered on 9/24/2024 for Resident #38. A phone interview on 12/6/2024 at 9:54 AM with Nurse #6 revealed revealed that she had completed and collected the UA specimen for Resident #38 on 9/25/2024 and placed it in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to honor a resident's food preferences for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for food preferences (Resident #31). Findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility 06/06/24. Review of Resident #31's Physician orders revealed an order dated 10/03/24 for a regular diet. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact and made himself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #31's nutrition care plan initiated 07/15/24 and last revised 12/03/24 revealed he was on a regular diet and desired double protein. Interventions included providing his diet as ordered and meeting his preferences. An interview with Resident #31 on 12/02/24 at 3:44 PM revealed he had asked the dietary department numerous times for large portions or at least double protein throughout his stay. He stated the last time he asked the Dietary Manager for large portions was on 12/01/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, Registered Dietician (RD), and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to provide Resident #52 with a renal diet as ordered. This failure affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility 09/11/24 with diagnoses including diabetes and dependence on renal dialysis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively intact and received dialysis. Review of Resident #52's Physician orders revealed a diet order dated 09/17/24 for a regular renal diet and no potatoes, tomato sauce/soup, dried beans, cooked spinach, bananas, oranges/orange juice, raisins, cantaloupe, honey dew, star fruit, nuts, or chocolate. Resident #52's nutrition care plan last updated 11/13/24 revealed he was on a regular renal diet with thin liquids and interventions included providing his diet as ordered and weighing him as needed. An observation of Resident #52's meal ticket and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record when staff documented that they applied a splint when a splint was not applied. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for accurate medical records. The findings included: Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included contracture of muscle, right hand. A physician's order dated 11/01/2023 read- Staff to don (apply) right hand splint, Place Pillow under right hip, all shifts to access for any skin irritation. Doff (remove) pm shift, every shift. An observation of Resident #73 on 12/02/2024 at 11:34am revealed Resident #73 did not have a splint in place to her right hand. During observation on 12/03/2024, Resident #73 was observed at 9:33am with no splint on right hand. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed it was documented by Nurse #2 on 12/02/2024 and 12/03/2024 that the splint was applied to Resident #73 ' s right hand.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedures in the areas of employee training and investigation by not preserving evidence that could be used in a sexual assault allegation. Nurse #1 and Nurse Aide #1 provided incontinent care to a [AGE] year old female resident with severe impairment in cognition (Resident #2) and disposed of the brief after finding a [AGE] year old male resident with moderate impairment in cognition (Resident #1) with his short/boxers pulled down lying in bed up close and behind the female resident with the perceived intention of engaging in sexual activity. This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation with a revised date of 03/02/23 read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure toenails were trimmed and refer a resident to podiatry services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #85) reviewed for foot care. The findings included: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic gout with tophus (buildup of uric acid around joints). Resident #85's care plan revised on 3/22/23 indicated Resident #85 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance due to severe tophus feet deformities. Interventions included for nursing staff to provide ADL assistance per facility schedule and as needed. A review of Resident #85's medical record indicated a physician's order dated 3/22/23 of: May initiate evaluation and treatment by podiatry per regulation. There were no podiatry consults in Resident #85's medical record. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #85 was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident, staff, Pharmacist, Nurse Practitioner, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to re-order medications from the pharmacy when there were 5 doses left to ensure medications were available to be administered for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #35) reviewed for significant medication errors. The findings included: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, chronic pain, neuropathy, and muscle spasms. a. A review of Resident #15's physician's orders indicated an active order for Baclofen tablet 20 milligrams (mg) - give 20 mg by mouth 2 times a day at 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM for muscle spasm which started on 04/19/23. Resident #15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from August to October 2023 indicated the following information. August MAR - on 08/27/23 the Baclofen which was scheduled to be given at 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM was missed for the 6:00 PM dose. The medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident, staff, Pharmacist, Nurse Practitioner, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician that included Xarelto for atrial fibrillation, Baclofen for muscle spasms, Gabapentin for pain, Fentanyl patch for pain and Copaxone injections for Multiple Sclerosis. This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #35) reviewed for significant medication errors. The findings included: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, chronic pain, seizure disorder, neuropathy, and muscle spasms. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact with no behaviors and required limited to extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. The MDS assessment further revealed Resident #15 received anticoagulant medication 6 out of 7 days during the assessment period.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to obtain dental services needed for extractions for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for dental services (Resident #62). The Findings Included: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included congestive heart failure and kidney disease. The annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded Resident #62 as cognitively intact and with no dental concerns. A review of Resident #62's dental records revealed Resident #62 last received dental service on 10/7/22 and a dental consent for tooth extractions was signed on 10/21/22 by Resident # 62 and a Nurse Practitioner. A review of Resident #62's medical record and progress notes revealed no additional dental exams or dental notes after the signed consent on 10/22/23. On 10/09/23 at 2:10 PM Resident # 62 stated he had been waiting 6 months to receive his upper dentures. Resident #62 said during his last dental exam, he agreed to have his remaining upper teeth pulled so he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to clean 2 of 2 ice scoop holders and failed to store an ice scoop under sanitary conditions. This practice had the potential to affect beverages served to residents. The findings included: An observation of the A Hall ice chest cooler ice scoop holder on 10/11/23 at 9:44 AM revealed standing water with grey/brown debris in the water in the bottom of the ice scoop holder. The tip of the ice scoop was submerged in the water. An interview with NA #2 on 10/11/23 at 9:44 AM said the coolers and ice scoops were cleaned by the kitchen but was unable to recall when ice chest and scoops were cleaned. An observation of the B Hall ice chest cooler and ice scoop holder on 10/11/23 at 10:05 AM revealed grey/brown debris in the bottom of the ice scoop holder with standing water. The standing water was not touching the ice scoop. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated on 10/11/23 at 10:39 AM the ice chest and ice scoops were not the responsibility of the kitchen to be checked for cleanliness and to be cleaned. The DM stated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) process failed to implement, monitor, and revise as needed the action plan developed for the recertification and complaint surveys dated 07/11/22 and 07/23/21 to achieve and sustain compliance. This was for 1 recited deficiency on the current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 10/13/23 related to food procurement, store/prepare/serve-sanitary. The continued failure during three federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective quality assurance program. The findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F-812 - Based on observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to clean 2 of 2 ice scoop holders and failed to store an ice scoop under sanitary conditions. This practice had the potential to affect beverages served to residents. During the previous recertification and complaint survey on 07/11/22, the facility failed to change oil used in a deep fryer that appeared burnt and black in color,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with the resident, staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to provide nail care to 1 of 2 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. The findings included: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic gout with tophus (buildup of uric acid around joints). Resident #85's care plan revised on 3/22/23 indicated Resident #85 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance due to severe tophus feet deformities. Interventions included for nursing staff to provide ADL assistance per facility schedule and as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #85 was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with personal hygiene. An observation and interview with Resident #85 on 10/9/23 at 9:44 AM revealed he had long, thick fingernails on the right hand which extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to store unopened medications in the temperatures specified by manufacturer's guidelines for 1 or 4 medications carts observed during medication storage checks (A hall medication cart #2). The findings included: Review of facility's medication storage policy and procedure dated 11/01/20 indicated all medications in the facility would be stored in the medication rooms or medication carts according to the manufacturer's recommendations to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Review of manufacturer's package insert for Latanoprost eye drops reveled unopened bottle should be stored under refrigeration between 36° to 46° Fahrenheit (F) and protected from light. Once opened, Latanoprost may be stored at room temperature up to 77° F for up to six weeks. Review of manufacturer's package insert for insulin glargine injection indicated unopened pen should be stored in refrigerator at 36°F to 46°F until expiration and kept away from direct heat and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-12-06 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, the facility failed to have a qualified professional to direct the facility's activity program. This practice had the potential to affect all 106 residents at the facility. The findings included: On 12/3/24 at 2:13 PM an interview was conducted with the Assistant Activity Director (AD). She stated that she started working at the facility on October 16th, 2024. She stated that there was an Activity Director (admission Coordinator) when she started who left the beginning of November 2024. The Assistant Activity Director stated she had no training other than when the AD was working at the facility. The Assistant Activity Director could not give any details of any training the AD gave her. The Assistant Activity Director indicated she had no college degree. The Assistant Activity Director did not realize that the AD she was referring to was actually an acting AD. On 12/3/24 at 2:25 PM an interview was conducted with the Activity Assistant. She stated that she started working at the facility on 11/28/24. She had not had any training since working at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-06 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a discharge-return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and entry tracking records within the regulated timeframes for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for resident assessments (Resident #47 and #83). Findings included: a. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #47's electronic medical record revealed the following: A discharge-return anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] that was marked as completed on 07/23/24. An entry tracking record dated 07/02/24 that was marked as completed on 07/23/24. During a joint interview on 12/04/24 at 12:43 PM, MDS Nurse #1, MDS Nurse #2 and MDS Nurse #3 all verified Resident #47's discharge-return anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] and entry tracking record dated 07/02/24 were not completed within the regulatory time frame. b. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #83's electronic medical record revealed an entry-tracking record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-12-06 · tag F0914 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with the resident and staff the facility failed to install a privacy curtain and failed to ensure the privacy curtain extended around the bed for 2 of 9 rooms reviewed for environment (room [ROOM NUMBER]-A and #304-A). Findings included: a. An observation on 12/03/24 at 2:06 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was a semi-private room shared by two residents. There was no ceiling mounting track in place to have a privacy curtain installed that extended around bed 207-A located by the door. An observation and interview on 12/03/24 at 2:06 PM Nurse Aide (NA) #7 revealed she was the assigned NA for room [ROOM NUMBER]-A and did not notice there was no privacy curtain in place. During an observation and interview on 12/04/24 at 10:19 AM room [ROOM NUMBER]-A continued to have no privacy curtain in place and no ceiling mounting track for it to be installed. The resident residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A revealed he liked to crack the door open and wanted the privacy curtain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-21 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a Social Worker (SW) who had a minimum of a bachelor's degree in social work or human services field when the skilled nursing facility had 134 certified beds. Findings included: Review of the facility's Social Services Director job description revealed the job requirements included a bachelor's degree in social work, sociology, psychology or a bachelor's degree in a human services field including but not limited to sociology, special education, rehabilitation counseling, psychology and one year of supervised social work experience in a health care setting working directly with individuals. During a telephone interview on 06/21/24 at 11:25 AM, the SW revealed she had started her employment at the facility on 06/05/24 as the facility's full-time SW. She verified that did not have a degree in social work but had an associate's degree in medical billing and coding. She explained she had worked in the SW position of other facilities for over 10 years but they had been facilities with less than 120 beds. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,452 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,452 — penalty dated 2024-06-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASCENT HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FRIEDMAN, YISROELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
FORD, ALBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HARDIN, STEVEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 3%Other / private 11%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,977per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345285. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next