No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aristacare At Cherry Hill

1399 Chapel Ave West, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (856) 663-9009 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (856) 663-9009 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)$4,194 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $4,194 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
409 State St · (856) 427-4336 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
500 Route 38 · (856) 665-7180 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
 
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.1%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%15.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.2%12.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.8%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%8.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.672.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.021.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.2%CMS range 44.6–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.2–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.3–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
68.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 133.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT #2801510Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 6/4/26 and 6/5/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice, when staff failed to consistently document that wound care was provided on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #3 & Resident #6) and was evidenced by the following:a). A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: paraplegia, injury of the thoracic spinal cord at the T7-T10 level, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #3's care plan (CP) indicated that Resident #3 had a focus related to the resident having skin impairment. Interventions for this focus area included to provide treatments per facility protocol. A review of Resident #3's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for March 2026 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    CFR9s): 483.70(h)(1)S483.70(h) Medical records.S483.70(h)(1) In accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are- (i) Complete; (ii) Accurately documented; (iii) Readily accessible; and (iv) Systematically organized Based on interviews, medical record reviews and reviews of other pertinent facility documentation on 1/16/26, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Medication Administration Record (MAR) documentation was accurate as evidenced by a.) the Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN) not obtaining and transcribing an order for a resident who required medication administration to correct low blood sugar and b.) the Director of Nursing (DON) completing medication administration entries on behalf of LPN#1. This resulted in inaccurate medical records and failure to identify potential medication errors, this deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident records (Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following:On 1/16/26 the surveyor Resident #2's December 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe and sanitary manner, and b) maintain the garbage dumpster area in a clean, safe manner, and free from pests as evidenced by the following:On 8/21/25 at 10:36 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:1. The can-opener blade had a metal chip on the right side and brown sticky food debris on the blade and screw connection. The FSD acknowledged it had not been changed since she started working at the facility. The FSD acknowledged that the can-opener was not cleaned according to facility policy. The FSD was unable to produce a maintenance log to indicate when the blade should be replaced.2. The can-opener holder attached to the counter had a blue insert which was covered with brown sticky debris. A cleaning log for the can-opener could not be provided. The FSD acknowledged that it was not cleaned according to facility policy.3. The garbage dumpster and surrounding area had loose debris on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) follow appropriate infection control protocol for hand hygiene during the medication pass observation b) ensure that essential personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to prevent the spread of infection) was readily available for all staff and visitors: This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 nurses on 1 of 2 nursing units (Second Floor) during the medication pass observation and for 3 of 3 nursing units observed for adherence to infection control practices. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1) On 8/22/25 at 8:21 AM, the surveyor met with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 at the medication cart to observe the medication pass. LPN #4 stated that she needed to clean the electronic blood pressure machine prior to use. LPN #4 then proceeded to donn (put on) gloves before she used a disinfectant wipe to clean the attached blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter probe (a device placed on the finger to obtain the amount…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents that maintained a Personal Needs Account (PNA): a.) received a written notification when approaching the limit that could jeopardize a resident's eligibility for Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and b.) funds and final accounting of those funds were conveyed within 30 days of the resident's discharge to the proper jurisdiction.This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #50, #55 and #143) reviewed for PNA and was evidenced by: A review of the facility's Trial Balance revealed 3 (three) residents had balances that ranged from $1,901.47 to $6,917.52.On 8/25/2025 at 1:59 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) who stated a written notification should be sent out when the resident's balance reached $1800.00 for the monies to be spent down. She stated the residents could not have more than $2,000 in their account. The BOM stated if the resident was over the limit they would not be eligible for recertification for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment, equipment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner for 3 of 3 nursing units (100 unit, 200 unit, and 300 unit) observed for environment.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1) On 8/21/25 at 11:18 AM, during the initial tour of the first-floor unit, the surveyor observed an unsampled resident in room130-D lying in bed with his/her eyes closed. The surveyor observed brown liquid on the floor at the base of the tube feeding pole next to the head of the bed. There was a black fly observed on the linens on bed 130-D. At that time, the surveyor observed the linens on the unoccupied bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-C had a brown stain in the middle of the bed and had three (3) three black flies on the linens and one (1) black fly on the air mattress pump. The surveyor also observed a white plastic laundry basket next to bed 130-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) administer medications in a timely manner in accordance with the facility policy and professional standards of nursing practice b) ensure accountability of the narcotic shift count logs, c) accurately account for the administration of controlled medications d) follow a physicians order (PO) for both the application and the removal of a Lidocaine Pain Patch (transdermal pain reliever). This deficient practice was identified on one (1) of three (3) medication carts (Second floor, Low Cart), and the Automated Medication System (AMS) (an automated system, including robotic and intelligent dispensing cabinets to store and manage medications and supplies) in the First Floor Medication Room that was inspected during the medication storage observation. And for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #22 and #116) on 2 of 3 nursing units (First Floor and Second Floor) reviewed during the medication administration observation d) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 18)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic drug was limited to 14 days for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/22/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 with his /her eyes closed sitting in a reclining chair in the day room. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #5.A review of the admission Record, (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, and encephalopathy (a medical condition that affects brain function, leading to changes in mental state, behavior, and cognitive abilities).A review of the most current comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 7/8/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, which indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Intake ID: 393868Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) immediately, within two hours, or within 24 hours of the allegation if no harm occurred and submitted the outcome of the investigation within five working days in accordance with state and federal requirements. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following:On 8/25/2025 at 12:23 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record of Resident #33. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included: fusion of spine, lumbar (five vertebra in the low back) region, pathological (caused by disease or illness) dislocation of right knee, not elsewhere classified, heart failure, not elsewhere classified, other bipolar disorder (a mental disorder characterized by periods of elevation and depression), and other specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop an individual comprehensive care plan to include a resident's a.) anti-anxiety medication and, b.) history of diabetes mellitus.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for unnecessary medications and evidenced by the following:On 8/22/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 with his /her eyes closed sitting in a reclining chair in the day room. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #5.A review of the admission Record, (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia, and encephalopathy (a medical condition that affects brain function, leading to changes in mental state, behavior, and cognitive abilities) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 7/8/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise an individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) for a resident with an order for a tracheostomy (a surgically created hole, also called a stoma, in your windpipe, also known as your trachea). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #14), and was evidenced by the following:On 8/21/25 at 11:13 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #14 seated in their wheelchair in their room watching television. The surveyor did not observe a tracheostomy for Resident #14. On 8/22/25 at 12:45 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #14 seated in their wheelchair in their room. Resident #14 stated that when they were admitted to the facility he/she had a tracheostomy in place, but it was removed a couple years ago. On 8/22/25 at 10:42 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #14. A review of the admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with decreased range of motion and mobility received prescribed treatments to prevent contractures for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/22/25 at 1:34 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 lying in bed awake. When interviewed, the resident stated that he/she had a history of a stroke and could not move their left arm. The resident stated that he/she had a splint in one of the drawers, but the staff had not put it on for a long time. The resident's left upper extremity was covered with a thin blanket. On 8/22/25 at 1:47 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 who stated that she had just finished providing personal care to Resident #6. CNA #3 further stated that the resident did not have any contractures and their skin was intact.On 8/22/25 at 1:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #6. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to place a resident's urinary catheter drainage bag inside of a privacy bag to maintain resident dignity. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #90), and was evidenced by the following:On 8/21/25 at 10:56 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #90 lying in their bed awake. The resident stated that they had an issue with their suprapubic catheter (a type of indwelling catheter that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag). The surveyor observed the indwelling catheter drainage bag secured to the bed frame, not placed in a privacy bag, exposing the contents (urine) in the bag. The surveyor was able to observe the urine in the resident's catheter drainage bag from the hallway. On 8/21/25 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #90 lying in their bed awake. The resident stated that the facility used to put their catheter drainage bag in a privacy screen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen was administered in accordance with a physician's order. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and #122) reviewed for Respiratory Care and was evidenced by:1.) On 8/21/25 at 11:13 AM, during the initial tour the surveyor observed Resident #122 awake and alert lying in bed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula (prongs that are placed in the nostrils) at three (3) liters (L). On 8/22/25 at 9:11 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 lying in bed with their eyes closed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at 3L. On 8/25/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #122. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of sufficient oxygen reaching the body's tissues or an environment with low oxygen levels) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ185404 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 6/27/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to update the care plan (CP) with interventions for a resident (Resident #1) involved in a staff to resident abuse allegation. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 7 residents reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder, and Hypertension. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/12/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. According to the facility's Investigation, Summary and Conclusion dated 4/11/2025, revealed the social worker was doing rounds and the resident reported that his/her Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was rough with him/her. Resident #1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT#: NJ00183319, NJ00184308 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 2/11/25, 2/12/25, and 2/14/25, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) implement a care plan intervention for a physical therapy (PT) consult and b.) provide a resident with a Physical Therapy/Occupational Therapy (PT/OT) assessment after a fall as recommended by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Resident #2 was no longer at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Huntington's Disease (an inherited disorder that causes nerve cells in parts of the brain to gradually break down and die), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT#: NJ00183319, NJ00184308 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 2/11/25, 2/12/25, and 2/14/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents conducted an initial comprehensive visit. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Resident #2 was no longer at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Huntington's Disease (an inherited disorder that causes nerve cells in parts of the brain to gradually break down and die), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive. The AR further revealed the name of the resident's Attending Physician, who was also the facility's Medical Director. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    COMPLAINT#: NJ00181569 Based on observation, interview and review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented and complete medical records in accordance with acceptable standards and practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Resident #4 was no longer at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: seizures, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and COPD. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/18/24 indicated that Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating that the resident's cognition was intact. Review of Resident #4's Order Summary Report indicated an order as follows: -Clonazepam [Klonopin] Oral Tablet 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health within two hours for a.) an allegation of exploitation and misappropriation of resident property and b.) an allegation of verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 incidents of abuse reviewed (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/28/24 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #47 who stated he/she had an issue with a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who no longer worked at the facility. The resident stated he/she developed a bond with CNA #1, and the aide asked the resident to borrow money which he/she provided. The resident continued CNA #1 always paid them back the borrowed money, and there were multiple financial transactions, but CNA #1 stopped paying the resident back the money she borrowed. The resident stated he/she transferred the money using money applications (app) on their phone, and CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a.) an allegation of exploitation and misappropriation of resident property and b.) an allegation of verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 incidents of abuse reviewed (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/28/24 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #47 who stated he/she had an issue with a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who no longer worked at the facility. The resident stated he/she developed a bond with CNA #1, and the aide asked the resident to borrow money which he/she provided. The resident continued CNA #1 always paid them back the borrowed money, and there were multiple financial transactions, but CNA #1 stopped paying the resident back the money she borrowed. The resident stated he/she transferred the money using money applications (app) on their phone, and CNA #1 owed him/her around $330 that was never paid back. The resident stated the facility's Director of Quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #162587; 163869 Based on interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) administer medications within scheduled parameters on various shifts for two residents (Resident #38 & Resident #42); b.) complete the dialysis communication book for a resident on dialysis (Resident #37); and c.) follow a for physician's order to monitor a resident for urinary retention in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 27 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #37, #38, #42, & #45). Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of Nurse Staffing Report sheets, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked seven days a week for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 5 of 16 weekends reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During entrance conference on 2/27/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) how the facility's staff was, and the LNHA stated that staffing was good; that the facility primarily utilized agency staff for certified nursing aides (CNA); the facility did have callouts. At this time, the surveyor requested the Nurse Staffing Report to be completed for the following weeks: 1/1/23 through 1/7/23; 2/12/23 through 2/18/23; 2/19/23 through 2/25/23; 3/12/23 through 3/18/23; 5/21/23 through 5/27/23; 5/28/23 through 6/3/23. The surveyor reviewed the Nurse Staffing Reports which revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) to work eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 1. No RN on 1/7/23; the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly label and date medication in accordance with manufacturer recommendations and b.) maintain a medication refrigerator temperature log to ensure safe medication storage. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Second-Floor) and 1 of 3 medication carts (low cart- Second-Floor) inspected, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/4/24 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) inspected the Second-Floor nursing unit's low cart and observed the following multi-dose medications had been opened and undated: Incruse Ellipta 62.5 microgram (mcg) inhaler (medication used for symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD) dated opened 1/14. Instructions on the package were discard the inhaler six weeks after opening the moisture-protective foil tray . Advair HFA 230 mcg/21 mcg inhaler (medication used for asthma or COPD, opened and undated. Instructions on the package were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure residents who received the standard serving of the main entree for a regular texture lunch meal was adequate in protein based on the nutritional needs of the residents; b.) ensure the menu was followed; c.) ensure the facility's Registered Dietitian reviewed the menus for nutritional adequacy; and d.) ensure that residents received food and beverage in accordance with their preferences (Resident #6, #21, and #99) This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 regular texture meals observed and 3 of 6 residents reviewed for food (Resident #6, #21, & #99), and was evidenced by the following: 1. During entrance conference on 2/27/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) the facility's menus for the survey period which included that week and the following week. A review of the menu provided titled S/S Week 3 which was identified by the LNHA for the week of 2/25/24 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents a nourishing snack when there was more than a fourteen-hour span of time between the dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for five of five residents sampled for bedtime snacks (Resident #18, #19, #51, #65, and #73), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/29/23 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included five residents (Resident #18, #19, #51, #65, and #73). All five residents informed the surveyor during the meeting that bedtime (HS) snacks were not offered every night. They further stated that they had to ask for a snack and if there were any snacks left in the bins kept under the nurses station, they were given chips, pretzels, or cookies. All residents stated it would be nice if the facility automatically provided each resident with an HS snack. The residents confirmed dinner was served between 4:30-5:00 PM on the First-Floor nursing unit and breakfast between 8:00-8:45 AM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store, label, and date potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; b.) discard potentially hazardous foods past their date of expiration; and c.) maintain storage areas in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2.27/24 at 10:42 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Director of Dietary (DD) and observed the following: 1. In the walk-in refrigerator, one five-pound container of sour cream dated opened 2/1/24. The container had a manufacturer printed expiration date of 5/24/24, but the DD was unsure how many days the sour cream could be used for once opened. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator, one five-pound container of cottage cheese dated opened 2/13/24, with an expiration date of 2/24/24. 3. In the walk-in refrigerator, one gallon of mayonnaise opened. The container had no opened date or when to use by; the DD stated mayonnaise was good for one month after opened. 4. In the walk-in freezer, the vinyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ# 162587 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey for 75 out of 105 day shifts reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The following ratio(s) were effective on 02/01/2021: One Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to every eight residents for the day shift. One direct care staff member to every 10 residents for the evening shift, provided that no fewer than half of all staff members shall be CNAs, and each direct staff member shall be signed in to work as a CNA and shall perform nurse aide duties: and One direct care staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ161584 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices were followed by a.) ensuring appropriate personal protective equipment was worn for residents on enhanced barrier precautions; b.) maintaining and storing medical supplies and tubing in a sanitary manner to prevent infection; c.) ensure medical equipment and privacy curtains were maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent infection; d.) ensure proper and hygiene was performed prior to dining; and e.) infection control practices were followed during medication observation. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 nursing units (First and Second-Floor) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/27/24 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor observed outside Resident #58's room, a sign that indicated the resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions which instructed before entering and exiting the room, you must perform hand hygiene; wear (don) a gown for high contact resident care activities which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an adequate antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice was identified during a review of the last three months of antibiotic use and conducted surveillance from November 2023 through February 2024, and was evidenced by the following: This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/5/24 at 8:54 AM, the surveyor requested the facility's surveillance for the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. At that time, the Infection Preventionist (IP) met with the surveyor, but the IP could not provide surveillance documentation for antibiotics used. The IP stated that the nurses filled out blue forms on the units for antibiotic use, and she reviewed them during the morning meeting. She stated that she had a spreadsheet that she documented and prepared a monthly report for the Director of Nursing (DON). At that time, the surveyor requested the forms and the spreadsheet from the IP, but the IP could not provide the forms. On 3/6/24 at 1:06 PM, the Chief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain a resident bathroom sink (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]) in a sanitary working condition and b.) maintain resident rooms and common area in a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 3 nursing units (Second-Floor). The evidence was as follows: 1. During a water temperature tour on 2/29/24 at 10:50 AM, the surveyor observed in the presence of the Maintenance Director (MD) in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, the sink did not operate properly, that the water dripped out. The MD stated at the time of the observation, that he was unaware that Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom sink was not working. The MD stated all maintenance work that needed to be done was entered into the electronic work order system [name redacted]. At this time the surveyor requested the electronic work order system [name redacted] report for the year. On 2/29/24 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were served their meals in a dignified manner during meal services. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units (Second-Floor), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/27/24 from 12:18 PM to 12:49 AM, the surveyor made the following meal observations in the Second- Floor dining room: On 2/27/24 at 12:19 PM, the food truck arrived to the Second-Floor nursing unit. There were sixteen residents observed seated in the dining room at five different tables. The Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) placed a tray in front of Resident #30 and walked away. Resident #30's tablemate proceeded to take Resident #30's tray and removed the dome from the tray. The surveyor observed that CNA #2 from the opposite side of the dining room addressed the resident in a raised voice stating, Leave it alone [Resident's name] [he/she] is feeder. On 2/27/24 at 12:29 PM, the surveyor observed the staff did not serve residents by tables. The surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ160540 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide a wheelchair for resident use when out of bed(Resident #43); b.) maintain the call bell within reach of the resident (Resident #58); and c.) accommodate a resident whose preference was to smoke without getting wet during inclement weather (Resident #31). This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 28 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #31, #43, and #58), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/28/24 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #43 in bed and there was no wheelchair observed in the room. On 2/29/24 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed with head of bed elevated, eyes closed. The resident did not respond to surveyor inquiry. There was no observed wheelchair noted in the room. On 2/29/24 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor interviewed the resident's primary Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1), who stated the resident needed complete care and she wanted to get the resident out of bed, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/28/24 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #47 who stated he/she had an issue with a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who no longer worked at the facility. The resident stated he/she developed a bond with CNA #1, and the aide would ask the resident to borrow money which he/she provided. The resident continued CNA #1 always paid them back the borrowed money, and there were multiple financial transactions, but CNA #1 stopped paying the resident back the money she borrowed. The resident stated he/she transferred the money using money applications (app) on their phone, and CNA #1 owed him/her around $330 that was never paid back. The resident stated the facility's Director of Quality Experience (DQE) and current Licensed Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) develop an abuse policy that was in accordance with regulatory guidelines and b.) implement their abuse policy for an allegation of misappropriation of resident property. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #47), and was evidenced by the following: During entrance conference on 2/27/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor requested and provided the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Entrance Conference Worksheet which indicated in section 32. Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures to be provided to the surveyor for the next day. On 2/28/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's undated Abuse Policy and Procedure which did not include how the facility would protect residents from abuse through screening, training, preventing, identification, and protecting. The policy included investigation and reporting. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #80), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/29/24 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 in a wheelchair in the hallway self-propelling using their feet. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #80. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, cerebral infarction (stroke- parts of the brain become damaged or die). A review of the Psychiatric Progress Noted dated 2/12/24 included under diagnosis and plan that the resident had a current diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder- depressed type, insomnia, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). A review of the resident's most recent comprehensive MDS, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 28 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #45, #80, and #102), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/28/24 at 10:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #45 sleeping in bed on his/her right side. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #45. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary), Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of left femur, pressure ulcer (Stage 4) left hip, and heart failure. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool reflected that the resident was not able to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) revise a comprehensive care plan and for pressure wounds and b.) revise a care plan to include a resident gave staff money. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 27 residents reviewed for care plans revisions (Resident #47 & Resident #79) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/28/24 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed the resident seated in a high-back wheelchair with foot pedals. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #79. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident had a diagnosis that included but was not limited to anemia, fracture of the right femur, and hypertension. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/6/24, reflected the resident had a cognitive mental status of memory problems with severe impairment. Further review revealed the resident had a stage III…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) assist a resident out of bed daily with the use of a hoyer lift as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #102), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/29/24 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #102 in bed. The resident stated that he/she was waiting for their lunch meal and that he/she needed assistance getting out of bed and wished that the staff would get him/her out of bed. Resident #102 stated that he/she had not been out of bed for over a week. On 3/1/24 at 12:45 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #102 in bed eating their lunch. Resident #102 stated that he/she still had not been assisted out of bed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #102. A review of admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to peripheral vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion of the right hand received appropriate services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for positioning/mobility (Resident #6), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/27/24 at 12:44 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #6 who stated that they had a contracture to the right hand. When asked if he/she was supposed to wear a brace, the resident opened their dresser drawer to show the surveyor a brace. Resident #6 stated that they do not wear it because it hurts. The resident stated that he/she had told the nursing staff, but nothing had been done. On 2/29/24 at 11:21 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 dressed and seated in their wheelchair. The resident did not have the brace applied. On 3/4/24 at 10:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #6 dressed and seated in their wheelchair. The resident did not have the brace applied. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was assessed and the comprehensive care plan was updated post fall with safety interventions for a resident with a history of falls. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #79), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/28/24 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed the resident seated in a high-back wheelchair with foot pedals in the dining area. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident # 79. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included anemia, fracture of the right femur, and hypertension. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/6/24, reflected a cognitive mental status of memory problems with severe impairment. Further review of Section I Active Diagnoses reflected a fall diagnosis. A review of the Progress Note included a Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to accurately document the administration of a controlled medication for 1 sampled resident (Resident #171) identified upon inspection of 1 of 3 medication carts (low-cart Second-Floor), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/4/24 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) inspected the Second-Floor nursing unit low-side medication cart. A review of the narcotics located in the secured and locked narcotic box and reconciled to the controlled drug administration record, a declining inventory sheet, revealed Resident #171's tramadol 50 milligram (mg) tablet, a medication used to relieve pain, did not match. The blister packs contained 36 tablets and the declining inventory sheet indicated there should be 37 tablets remaining. The LPN stated she had administered the medication earlier and she had forgotten to sign the declining inventory sheet for the dose she had administered. The LPN further stated the declining inventory sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and appetizing temperatures of food for 2 of 2 regular texture meals observed during 1 of 1 meal observations (lunch) on 1 of 3 nursing units (Second-Floor). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/29/24 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included five residents (Resident #18, #19, #51, #65, and #73). Four of the five residents informed the surveyor during the meeting that the meals served at the facility were cold; room temperature if lucky. On 3/1/24 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor informed the Director of Dietary (DD) they wanted to observe the lunch meal for the day including food temperatures. The surveyor asked the DD to calibrate the facility's digital thin probe thermometer in their presence; which the DD completed using an ice bath, and the thermometer reached 33 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The surveyor completed the same process, and their thermometer reached 32 F. On 3/1/24 at 11:40 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #:NJ00164488 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation on 11/28/23 and 11/30/23, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for a resident with a suprapubic catheter (a tube used to drain urine from the bladder through a cut in the abdomen) in accordance with physician's orders. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #1, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bladder and bowel care and was evidenced by the following: On 11/28/23 at 10:32 AM the surveyor observed Resident #1 lying in bed with a drainage bag hanging off their bed with a small amount of yellow liquid inside the bag. When interviewed, Resident #1 stated that it depended on which staff members were working if their drainage bag was emptied or their suprapubic catheter was flushed. According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00163880, NJ00164147 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation on 11/28/23 and 11/30/23, it was determined that the facility failed to follow up with a medical provider when a routinely scheduled medication was unavailable. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #2, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, and was evidenced by the following: On 11/28/23 at 11:02 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 in their bed. The resident did not respond to the surveyor's questions. According to the admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to seizures, cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull) with loss of consciousness. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 06/02/23, revealed that the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/19/21 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. A stack of five aluminum pans was stored on a multi-tiered cart. The surveyor observed the five aluminum pans were wetnesting and noted a slimy unknown substance on the edge of the bottom aluminum pan. The surveyor wiped the edge of the bottom aluminum with a napkin and noted debris and a slimy unknown substance on the napkin. 2. A soiled dishware was stored on the top shelf of a multi-tiered cart alongside clean and sanitized dishware. 3. A stack of seven one-third pans was stored on a multi-tiered cart. The seven one-third pans were wetnesting. 4. In the juice box area, a juice nozzle was not attached to a juice box and touched the floor. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication in accordance with the physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #95) and was evidenced by the following: According to the resident's admission Record, Resident #95 had a diagnosis including, but not limited to, essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure in which additional and underlying causes contributing to the high blood pressure are not present). According to the Physician's Orders, Resident #95 had an order for Hydralazine tablet 50 milligrams (mg) - give 50 mg by mouth three times a day for hypertension - hold if SBP is less than 130 mm HG, where SBP (systolic blood pressure) is the first (top) number and is a measure of the exertion of blood against the artery walls, when the heart beats. Further review of the orders revealed that the referenced medication order and hold parameter began on 08/12/21 and remained current into November of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide residents' meals with food items as requested, b.) speak to the residents about alternate food items when the items first requested were not available and c.) provide food at a preferable and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice was identified for Residents #8, #21, #26, #37, #71, #247, #297, and #298 observed by the surveyors during a breakfast and lunch meal on 2 of 2 nursing units (1st Floor and 2nd Floor Units), and 5 of 5 residents who attended the Resident Council and was evidenced by the following: On 11/16/21 at 9:33 AM, during the initial tour of the 1st Floor Unit, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #247 sitting at beside with a disposable breakfast tray on the overbed table. When interviewed, the resident stated the breakfast meal consisted of a boiled egg, muffin, oatmeal, and that it was not hot. Surveyor #1 reviewed Resident #247's breakfast meal ticket which indicated the following under Hot items: oatmeal, egg and cheese, breakfast ham, and an English muffin. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/16/2021 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed asleep and the call bell was on the floor, to the left side of the resident's bed. On 11/17/2021 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed awake and the call bell was on the floor, at the foot of the bed. The resident stated he/she uses the call bell to call for help, but that the call bell is usually on the floor. On 11/18/2021 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed awake and the call bell was on the floor, at the foot of the bed. The resident stated that he/she yells out for help when the call bell is not within reach or relies on his/her roommate to get assistance. According to the admission Record, Resident #52 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that facility staff failed to complete neurological assessments after a resident fall, in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a floor mat was in place for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 11/17/2021 at 1:04 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed. The resident's left side of the bed was against the wall and a floor mat was folded next to the resident's right side of the bed, exposing the bottom right half of the bed to the floor. On 11/18/2021 at 10:43 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed. The resident's left side of the bed was against the wall and a floor mat was folded at the foot of the resident's bed, exposing the entire right side of the bed to the floor. According to the admission Record, Resident #52 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke) and hemiplegia (partial paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial weakness) affecting the left non-dominant side.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff and the public by failing to keep the garbage container area free of garbage and debris, and failed to have a cover over the openings of 1 of 2 garbage containers/dumpsters. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/16/21 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), and requested to see the outside garbage receptacle area. The surveyor observed a garbage container (GC) that was uncovered and exposed to the elements. The GC had a closed lid on the left-side, but the right-side lid was open exposing multiple trash bags inside. The surveyor further observed that both the left-side and right-side doors of the GC was also open exposing multiple trash bags inside. The surveyor observed that the outside garbage receptacle area was littered with debris, used gloves, clear bags, and juice cartons. When interviewed at that time, the FSD stated that everyone was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-03-07 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, an assessment tool, as required for 2 of 2 system selected for residents with a MDS record over 120 days reviewed (Resident #13 and Resident #111), and was evidenced by the following: On 3/6/24 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the system selected MDS record over 120 days which revealed Resident #13 and Resident #111 were overdue for a MDS assessment. On 3/6/24 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS/Registered Nurse (RN) who stated MDS assessments were completed upon admission, quarterly, annually, any significant changes in status, or at discharge. The MDS/RN continued that the assessments were completed within ninety-four days of the previous quarterly assessment or within fourteen days of discharge. At this time, the surveyor asked the MDS/RN when the last completed MDS assessments were for Resident #13 and Resident #111, and the MDS/RN revealed the following: Resident #13 was discharged from the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00164488 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/28/23 and 11/30/23, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document on the Documentation Survey Report the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the resident. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #1, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for documentation and was evidenced by the following: On 11/28/23 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 lying in bed and interviewed him/her at this time. Resident #1 stated it depended which staff member was assigned as their CNA if they received timely ADL care. According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-11-24 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted 24-hour staffing report was completed in its entirety. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/19/2021 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report, dated 11/19/21 Day Shift, posted at the visitor entrance, which omitted information in the # of Staff, Total Hours Worked, and Staff to Resident Ratio columns. During an interview with the surveyor on 11/19/2021 at 10:05 AM, the Receptionist stated the Staffing Coordinator posts the Staffing Report daily and provided a copy of all the Staffing Reports posted at the visitor entrance. Review of the following facility's New Jersey Department of Health Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report revealed: On 11/16/21 Day Shift, the Staffing Report omitted the number of Total Hours Worked and the Staff to Resident Ratios for each staff category. On 11/16/21 Evening Shift, the Staffing Report omitted the number of Total Hours Worked and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$4,194 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARISTACARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GREENBERGER, SIDNEYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2012
KLEIN, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2012
SCHERFEL, JAYSONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2017

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 10%Other / private 16%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,141per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315245. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next