No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aristacare At Whiting

23 Schoolhouse Road, Whiting, NJ 08759 · For profit - Individual · 180 certified beds · (732) 849-4300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (732) 849-4300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Aug 2025
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
63 Lacey Rd Ste C · (732) 849-9500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
500 Route 530 · (732) 408-4206 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
400 Lacey Rd · (732) 716-1580 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(732) 657-8121 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
30 Schoolhouse Rd · (732) 350-5001

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.8%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.1%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.8%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%15.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.2%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.032.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.201.111.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.8%CMS range 44.0–58.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.3–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.4–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
50.4%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 145.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-14)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to prohibit the use of portable electric space heaters in an unsafe manner and in accordance with product fire safety guidelines to maintain a safe environment free of fire hazards in accordance with CFR 483.25(d). This deficient practice affected all 127 residents residing at the facility and was evidenced by the following:Observations on 08/12/2025 at 10:35 AM, in the presence of the Maintenance Director (MD) and Regional Director of Maintenance (RDM), revealed a portable electric space heater that was plugged into an unapproved electrical adapter, was ON and unattended under the wood desk next to combustible storage in the second floor Social Worker (SW) office. An interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed that the heater did not belong to the facility and stated electric space heaters were not permitted in the facility because they were a fire hazard. The MD confirmed the heater was ON, plugged into an unapproved electrical device and was hot to the touch. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ #: 182491 Based on interview and review of the Nurse Staffing Report and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 9 of 9 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) revealed the facility had no Registered Nurse (RN) hours for the following dates:01/05/202501/19/202502/15/202502/22/202502/23/202503/01/202503/08/202503/15/2025Review of the Employee Daily Schedule by Shift, provided by the facility, for the aforementioned dates verified that there was no RN scheduled to work 8 consecutive hours.During an interview with the surveyor on 08/13/2025 at 12:31 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there should be a RN in the facility for 8 consecutive hours daily. During an interview with the surveyor on 08/14/2025 at 09:42 AM, the Corporate Clinical Officer acknowledged that there were no RN in the facility daily for 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness and b.) maintain kitchen equipment in a manner to prevent microbial growth. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/8/25 at 9:18 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) and observed the following: 1. At the time of observation, the dish machine was not running. The surveyor requested to view the logs of temperature checks. Log review showed no temp check for 8/6/25, 8/7/25, and 8/8/25 for the AM. The AFSD stated, They didn't do them. 22. On a large metal rack there were items that the AFSD said were drying. On the rack the surveyor observed a plastic bin with 12 white plastic coffee carafe lids. The lids had splatters of brown substance. The surveyor asked if they were clean and the AFSD said yes. The surveyor asked again and the AFSD told surveyor he would run them in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 Units identified under the Environmental Task.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/11/2025 at 08:59 AM during rounds on the 2 East unit, the surveyors observed: 1. Scratches in the wall with missing paint behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. A missing tile on the floor near the resident's bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. A broken bottom drawer of a dresser in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. A broken outlet plate with sharp edges in room [ROOM NUMBER] 5. Broken blinds in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. 6. A broken middle drawer to the nightstand in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 7. Cracked and missing foam from the handle of the reclining chair in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 8. There where 5 broken covers for overhead lights in the hallways. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 10:46 AM with the surveyors,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate behavior monitoring for a resident receiving psychotropic medications. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #12) and was evidenced by the following:On 8/8/25 at 10:10 AM, the resident was observed self-propelling in a wheelchair in the room.The surveyor reviewed Resident #12 medical record.A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #12 was admitted with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to schizoaffective disorder (combination of schizophrenia and mood disorder), depression, bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and pain in right hip.The surveyor reviewed the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 6/2/25. The resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, meaning the resident had moderate cognitive impairment.A review of the Physician Order Summary (POS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 25 residents reviewed, Resident #10. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:The surveyor reviewed the admission Record for Resident #10 which reflected that the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease (high blood pressure with severe kidney damage where the kidneys have almost completely stopped working) and essential Primary hypertension (high blood pressure.)The surveyor reviewed the physician's orders revised on 7/17/2025 which revealed Hemo-dialysis M-W-F send patient with Dialysis binder fill out vital signs and medications given prior to leaving.The surveyor reviewed Resident #10's Care Plan (CP) which revealed I, (Resident #10) need hemodialysis r/t renal failure 3 X Weekly (M-W-F)@…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY complaint # 2563750Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan that meets the needs identified on the comprehensive assessment care for 1 of 25 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, Resident #14. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 08/08/2025 at 09:37 AM during initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident # 14 in bed with the door to their room open. There was a mesh stop sign attached to one side of the door and not connected to the other side. On 08/11/2025 at 09:11 AM the surveyor observed Resident # 14 sitting on their bed with the door open, the mesh stop sign was not connected to both sides of the door. A review of Resident # 14's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 14 was admitted with but not limited to bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme mood swings), Dementia (a decline in cognitive function that affects, memory, thinking and social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their own policy for respiratory equipment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for respiratory concerns and was evidenced by the following: During a tour of the facility on 08/08/2025 at 9:49 AM, Resident #3 was observed in the room. The surveyor observed the nebulizer machine (a nebulizer machine delivers aerosol medication to the person via a mouthpiece) on a cabinet next to the resident's bed. The surveyor observed the tubing dated 07/31/2025. On 08/11/2025 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor observed the tubing of the nebulizer machine dated 07/31/2025. A review of the medical record revealed Resident # 3 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to respiratory failure and asthma. A review of a Physician Order Sheet (POS) revealed a physician's order dated 06/01/2025, reflected that Resident # 3 was to receive ipratropium 0.5 milligrams(mg)-albuterol (a medicine that helps opens the airways) 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ00182491, NJ00182879 NJ00186106Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the prescriber's orders and accepted professional standards and principles by administering medications past the required time frame. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #144, and #27) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Complainant stated pain medications ordered nightly were given late. The surveyor reviewed the resident’s medical records. Review of the admission Records indicated Resident #144 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to fracture of left humerus (arm), congestive heart failure and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/1/25 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, meaning the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of section J of the MDS for pain assessment indicated the resident was on a pain regime and the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control for respiratory equipment. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Residents # 1, 149) reviewed for Respiratory Care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 08/08/2025 at 10:06 AM during the initial tour in Resident # 149's room, the surveyor observed a nebulizer chamber (piece of a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) disassembled and drying adjacent to a worn pair of socks on top of the nightstand. The tube for the nebulizer was on top of the socks.On 8/08/2025 at 10:13 AM during the initial tour while in Resident # 1's, the surveyor observed a nasal cannula (tube used to deliver oxygen through the nares) on top of a nightstand next to a graduated urinal. The nasal cannula was not in a bag. On 08/11/2025 at 10:13 AM while in Resident # 149's room, the surveyor observed a trash can with no bag liner in front of the nightstand.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, documentation review, and interviews on 8/12/2025 and 8/13/2025 in the presence of the Regional Director of Maintenance (RDM) and the Maintenance Director (MD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all devices used to identify call bell notifications were properly functioning in accordance with State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP Subsection 483.90(g). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following:An observation on 08/12/2025 at 10:05 AM revealed the call station pull cord closest to the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] was wrapped around the grab bar, prohibiting the station from being activated. When the cord was unwrapped and tested, it failed to initiate a call. The call station for Bed A in the same room did not function when activated. An observation at 10:10 AM revealed the master call station at the second floor nursing station reading 324 CALL FAIL. In an interview at 10:11 AM the MD stated that he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/18/2024 from 9:18 AM to 9:45 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), toured the kitchen and observed the following: In the walk-in freezer, the surveyor observed a spinach quiche, two packages identified by the FSD as pulled pork, and a pie with no labels or dates. The FSD stated that there should be a use by label if out of the package. He further stated that the above referenced items were not correct. A review of facility provided policy titled Labeling and Dating System Protocol rev 5/23/23, revealed All fresh and frozen foods must be dated with the date it was received into the kitchen, unless it has a Purveyor shipping label on it. Also included was All food in freezer storage - 6 months. N.J.A.C. 18:39-17.2(g)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for resident rooms on 3 of 3 nursing units of the facility observed (1 East, 2 East, and 2 West). The evidence of this deficient practice includes: 1.) On 03/18/2024 from 9:33 AM to 11:41 AM, during the initial tour of the 2 [NAME] nursing unit, the surveyor made the following observations: The vinyl wall covering in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] behind bed B was partially removed and pulled away falling off the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER] the plastic/vinyl wall bumper behind bed A was broken with pointed edges. The bath tub in room [ROOM NUMBER] contained brown and grey stains and the overflow plate was covered with a white crusty material. The wall behind bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER] had an approximately 12 inch by 4 inch area with gouges missing paint and revealing the bare drywall. room [ROOM NUMBER] had four holes approximately one inch in diameter in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of Nursing Staffing Report sheets and facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 5 of 51 days reviewed under the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the weeks of 07/10/2022 through 07/16/2022, 01/08/2023 through 01/14/2023, 03/10/2024 through 03/16/2024 revealed the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 07/16/2022, 01/08/2023, 01/14/2023, 03/10/2024, and 03/16/2024. A review of the facility provided schedules for those dates did not reveal any RN coverage. Additionally, facility provided schedules for 07/17/2022 and 03/17/2024. 07/17/2022 did not reveal any RN coverage. The schedule for 03/17/2024 revealed the Director of Nursing was present in the facility however the resident census on that day was 136. On 03/26/2024 at 1:40 PM during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy. The deficient practice was identified on 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed (1 East Low side cart and 2 [NAME] High side cart) during the Medication Storage Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/19/2024 at 10:05 AM during an interview with the surveyor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 4 said that narcotic shift count logs are to be completed by two nurses (the incoming and outgoing nurses) at the same time once they confirm an accurate count of the narcotics (opium, opium derivatives, and their semi-synthetic substitutes) in the medication cart. She also confirmed that shift count logs should not be missing any documentation or signatures. Further, she said that the inventory sheet should be filled out when she prepares to administer a narcotic. At that time, the surveyor, in the presence of LPN 4, reviewed the 1 East low side medication cart Narcotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure required monthly visits by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for the months of November 2023, December 2023, and January 2024. This irregularity was identified for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for CP review, Residents #63, #83, and #27. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 03/21/24 at 11:37 AM, the surveyor reviewed the CP progress notes. During review it was identified that the CP reviewed Resident #63 medications January 2023 through October 2023 every month. There was no available documentation for November 2023, December 2023, or January 2024. A review of the admission Record for Resident #63 indicated the resident had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety disorder, and intellectual disabilities. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/20/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer or discharge to the hospital for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization Residents #43, #129, and #230. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 03/20/24 the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which indicated Resident #129 was admitted to the facility for short term rehabilitation. Further review showed there was a Discharge/Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool completed on 12/22/23 following a transfer to the hospital for right shoulder pain. Review of the admission Record indicated Resident #129 had medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to the following: acute respiratory failure, kidney disease, and anxiety. The surveyor reviewed the most recent MDS which revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 3, meaning the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), within 14 days of completing the resident's assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 unsampled resident, (Resident # 95) reviewed in the Resident Assessment Task for MDS record over 120 days old. On 03/20/2024 the surveyor reviewed the MDS history in the electronic medical record which revealed: Resident #95 was discharged on 10/26/2023. Resident #95's discharge MDS was completed on 12/27/2023. The history indicates that Resident #95's discharge MDS was transmitted on 03/18/2024. On 03/21/2024, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), who stated that the discharge MDS on Resident #95 should've been completed within 14 days of discharge and transmitted within one week after completion. She also stated, it's late and the MDSs are usually transmitted once they're completed, this one got missed. Review of facility provided policy MDS Submission Timeframes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 1 assessment after a resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRRs (Resident #71) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/19/2024 the surveyor reviewed Resident #71's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which included review of the PASARR level 1 completed on 08/09/2022 which was negative and marked no for any diagnoses of mental illness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/06/2022, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition and review of section I did not include any psychiatric diagnoses. A review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated bipolar disorder and psychotic disorder noted in Section I. A review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated bipolar disorder and psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to 1. Obtain physician orders for a resident's discharge home, 2. follow physicians' orders during medication observation and 3. follow physician orders by obtaining an air mattress for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 29 residents reviewed (Resident #61, #96 and #128) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing a medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately label multidose medications to facilitate the consideration of precautions and safe administration. The deficient practice was observed for 1 of 4 medication carts (2 [NAME] High Side) reviewed under the Medication and Storage Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/19/2024 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 2 observed the 2 [NAME] High Side medication cart. At that time, the surveyor observed the following: 1 opened Artificial Tear bottle. The bottle was not dated when it was opened. 1 opened Spiriva (treats asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) handheld inhaler. The inhaler was not dated when it was opened. 3 opened Lantaprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution eye drops. The bottles were not dated when they were opened. 1 opened Dorzolamide hydrochloride and Timolol maleate ophthalmic solution eye drops. The bottle was not dated when they were opened. At this time, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage container area free of garbage and debris. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/18/2024 during initial kitchen tour with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed debris and trash around the dumpster area. The FSD stated that housekeeping was responsible for this area. He also stated that it was Monday and he guessed nobody had gotten out there as of that time. On 03/21/2024 at 12:28 PM the surveyor noted debris and trash in the area behind the dumpster area. On 03/25/2024 at 12:44 PM the surveyor interviewed the Director of Housekeeping who stated that housekeeping, maintenance and the kitchen are all in charge of the parking lot. He was shown a photo of the dumpster area and stated that they should go further than just the parking lot. A review of facility provided policy Sanitation: Dumpster/Garbage Disposal, dated November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) implement appropriate transmission-based precautions specifically by applying precautions to a room that contained a resident with a potentially infectious disease for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) and 2.) failed to perform effective hand hygiene for a minimum of twenty seconds. The deficient practices were identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 6) reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions under the Infection Control task and 2 of 3 nurses observed during the Medication Administration task . The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1.) A review of Resident # 6's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that on 03/18/2024, he/she was diagnosed with unspecified diarrhea. A review of Resident # 6's Order Summary Report located in the EMR revealed that on 03/18/2024 a, C DIFF DNA RT-PCR(STOOL) (test to determine the presence of clostridium difficile; a potentially deadly bacteria in the stool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ#156705 Based on interview and review of facility documents on 11/30/23, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 8 of 28 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the weeks of 07/17/22 through 07/23/22, 07/31/22 through 08/06/22, 11/12/23 through 11/18/23 and 11/19/23 through 11/25/23, revealed that the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 07/17/22, 07/31/22, 08/02/22, 08/03/22, 08/06/22, 11/18/23, 11/19/23 and 11/24/23. During a telephone interview with the surveyor on 12/01/23 at 11:00 am, the surveyor inquired about RN staffing in the building. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated, Yes, there should be at least one RN in the building. During a follow-up telephone interview with the surveyor on 12/01/23 at 2:17 pm, the LNHA confirmed that there was no RNs in the building on the aforementioned dates. The LNHA further stated, No RNs were available to come into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ#156370 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/30/23, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document on the Point of Care (POC) Legend Report the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to a resident. The deficient practice was identified for Resident #4, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for documentation and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the closed record for Resident #4: According to the admission Record, Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE], with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to: lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, seizures, and depression. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 07/14/22, indicated Resident #4's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS also indicated the resident required set-up help for ADLs. Review of Resident #4's POC Legend Report form,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document catheter urinary output according to the physician orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #11) and was evidenced as follows: On 11/23/21 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 lying in bed. The resident stated he/she had a urinary catheter bag (used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) and that staff would empty it, but he/she would also have to remind the staff to empty his/her urinary catheter bag when necessary. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #11. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility in March 2018, with diagnoses which included: neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder/neurogenic bladder (lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), urinary tract infection and altered mental status. A review of the most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a.) an accurate ordering, receiving and administration of narcotic medications that required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 form) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation; b.) accurately document the administration of controlled medications; c.) ensure Narcotic Shift Count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy; and d.) maintain a system of record keeping that ensures an accurate inventory of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 7 DEA 222 forms reviewed and 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed. The evidenced was as follows: On 12/1/21 at 11:59 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed the facility did not complete Part 5 of the form (number received and date received), as instructed to on the reverse of the DEA 222 form. The inaccuracies were identified on the following order forms: #210697903, #210697905, #210697909, #210697910, #210697913. On 12/1/21 at 12:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-06 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side. The deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units (Second Floor) and evidenced by the following: On 12/6/21 beginning at 8:25 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the facility's Maintenance Director (MD) toured the Second Floor nursing unit (Memory Impaired Unit). During the tour, the surveyor observed three (3) areas in the corridors that had no hand rails for residents to utilize in the following locations: 1. At 9:01 AM, the surveyor observed next to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] a six (6) feet long section of corridor wall with no handrail and across by stairwell #5 was a three (3) feet long section of wall with no handrail. At this time, the MD informed the surveyor that there used to be an imitation kitchen area with cabinets on the wall for the memory impaired residents, but the facility removed it. 2. At 9:15 AM, the survey observed next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders and administer medication based on pain scale level parameters for the prescribed medication oxycodone (a medication to treat severe pain) in accordance with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #115) reviewed for pain management. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities with in the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/23/21 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #115 who was sitting up in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer's instructions. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 mediation rooms inspected and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/29/21 at 8:41 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Registered Nurse/ Infection Preventionist (RN/IP) observed Nursing Unit 2 West's medication storage room. The medication refrigerator in the storage room contained one open multidose vial of Flucelvax (an injectable flu vaccine medication). The medication box was dated 11/5/21, the medication vial was not dated when it was opened. At this time, the surveyor interviewed the RN/IP who stated that this medication was good for 30 days and the vial should be dated once opened, and then proceeded to remove the medication from storage for disposal. On 11/29/21 at 8:54 AM, the surveyor in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) observed Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to maintain the ice machine chute to prevent microbial growth and food borne illness. This deficient practice was identified in the main kitchen and was evidenced by the following: On 11/22/21 at 09:55 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor asked to see the cleaning log for the ice machine and who was responsible to clean and maintain the ice machine. The FSD replied that he cleaned it, and maintenance sometimes cleaned. The surveyor reviewed the cleaning log which indicated that the last date the ice machine was cleaned was 8/16/21. Prior to 8/16/21, the log was signed as cleaned monthly from January 2021 to August 2021. The FSD informed the surveyor that he had cleaned it in September and October but just never signed the log. At this time, the surveyor asked the FSD to wipe the inside of the ice machine chute where the ice drops from. The FSD took a white paper towel and wiped the inside of the ice machine chute.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARISTACARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GREENBERGER, SIDNEYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2008
KLEIN, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2008
LOWINGER, EDWARDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2008
SCHWARTZ, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 07/01/2010
WEISEL, MORRISIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2008
KIRCHOFF, GINAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 10%Other / private 24%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,248per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$384per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315309. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next