No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aristacare At Meadow Springs

845 Germantown Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 · For profit - Partnership · 153 certified beds · (610) 279-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$17,664 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,664 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-19)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
850 Germantown Pike
Pharmacy
2250 Hickory Rd # 240 · (610) 834-1112 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
500 W Germantown Pike · (610) 832-0010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 Germantown pike · (610) 275-8179 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.6%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%17.0%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.3%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.6%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.6%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.0%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.2%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.331.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.051.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

25.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

25.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
32.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF25.2%CMS range 14.2–50.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.8–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.501.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
42.5%
Total nursing turnover
56.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 144.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect by exhibiting a pattern of neglect of medically fragile residents. Residents R2, R25, R45, R47, and R100 who are totally dependent on staff for all of their needs were not provided incontinence care, ileostomy care, and lack of investigation of bruising with an unknown origin for the five of 29 residents reviewed. This failure to provide necessary goods and services to residents put residents at risk of serious health complications and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedures titled Abuse dated April 9, 2024, revealed, it was the responsibility of the facility staff to ensure that each resident was free from abuse. Further review of the facility policy revealed each resident was to be protected from physical, mental, verbal, and sexual abuse. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of CDC requirements, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program including the utilization of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact resident care and failed to adequately educate staff on evidence-based infection control practices for residents on four of four nursing units (NPRU Nursing Unit, NLC Nursing Unit, PLC1 Nursing Unit, and PLC2 Nursing Unit). This failure placed residents at high risk to health and was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Program policy titled Infection Control Program Overview undated, revealed that the program is designed to prevent, identify, investigate, and control infections and communicable diseases; provide ongoing surveillance; educate staff and residents on infection prevention practices; ensure adherence to standard and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policies, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks and showers were maintained at a safe temperature for two of two nursing units observed (Unit One and Unit Two). This failure placed residents on Unit One and Unit Two at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings Include: Review of the Water Temperatures, Safety of Policy undated states that tap water . shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 100 degrees (44.33 Celsius), or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. 2. Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility and recording these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with resident and staff, review of facility provided documentation and review of policy, it was determined that facility failed to ensure that one of six residents reviewed was free of physical abuse during respiratory care. (Resident R1)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Abuse,' revised April 2026, defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed medical diagnosis of tracheostomy (tube inserted through the neck to assist breathing) status, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition of low oxygen levels), gastrostomy (a surgical place tube that delivers nutrition) status, restlessness and agitation, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on hospital and clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician and the responsible party of a significant change in the resident's medical condition and potential need to alter treatment for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident Cl1)Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy and procedures titled change in a resident's condition or status dated revealed that it was the responsibility of the staff to notify the physician and resident's representative of changes in the medical, mental condition or status of each resident. The policy indicated that the nursing supervisor was responsible for notifying the resident's attending physician when there was a significant change in the resident's medical, physical, emotional or mental condition, a need to alter a resident's medical treatment, a need to transfer a resident to the hospital or treatment center, a discharge without proper medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that for one of two residents reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a care plan developed within the 48 hours of the resident's admission that included the minimum health care information necessary to properly care for a resident. (Resident Cl1)Finding include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident Cl1 was admitted to the facility at 15:20 on March 5, 2026. Clinical record review for Resident Cl1 revealed diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure) non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding within the [NAME] that can occur in the brain tissue), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) of non-dominant side, tracheostomy (a surgical opening that creates an opening in the neck to facilitate breathing), gastrostomy (a surgical opening into the stomach for nutrition delivery), respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus (chronic condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record and facility documented grievance summary reviews, interviews with staff and residents and review of facility policy and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were able to identify the grievance officer, each resident was given a copy of the grievance policy and ensure that the grievance policy was in place to process grievances promptly, notified each resident of the progress and resolution of their concerns for thirteen of fifteen residents reviewed. (Residents R120, R41, R27, R17, R44, R46, R53, R72, R90, R128, R141, R59 and R109) Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled Resident Concern Policy revealed that the facility staff were responsible for providing residents with the best possible care. The policy also indicated that residents and family members could report a concern. The policy said that the concern would be investigated by facility staff in a timely manner. The policy indicated that a plan of correction would be implemented to address the problem, by attending to each resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documentation, review of facility policy, review of clinical records and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility did not ensure allegations were properly investigated to prevent and correct alleged violations for two of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R83 and R100)Findings include:Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated revised September 2022, revealed, The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately. A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. The information gathered is given to administration. Investigation of abuse: when an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the administrator or designee will investigate the incident with the assistance of appropriate personnel. The investigation will include: 1. Who was involved, 2. Resident statements; for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy, review of clinical records, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented regarding behaviors, refusals, bathing, activities, and toileting for three of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R131, R26 and R84). Review of facility policy 'Care Plans -Comprehensive,' unknown revision date, states that an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Further review of policy indicates that each resident's comprehensive care plan has been designed to: a. incorporate identified problem areas; b. incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; e. identify the professional services that are responsible for each element of care; f. aid in preventing or reducing declines in the resident's functional status and/or functional levels. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of policy, review of facility provided documentation and review of clinical record, it was determined that facility did not ensure resident safety related to shower thermometers in three of four showers and for the emergency pull system for one of three reviewed and did not ensure to provide adequate supervision to avoid accident during hygiene care (Resident R2)Review of facility policy 'Abuse' policy, reviewed on January 21, 2020, defines neglect as failure of facility , its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed medical diagnosis of anoxic brain damage, contracture of bilateral wrists and hands, muscle weakness, reduced mobility. Review of R2's clinical record revealed progress notes dated August 4, 2025, at 12:50 am, indicating multiple scattered skin tears are observed to the lower face, secondary to trauma/injury due to a shaving razor. Review of facility provided grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of policy, review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care for two of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R25, and R131)Review of facility policy 'Incontinence Care,' indicates that it is its purpose to ensure that all residents who are incontinent of urine, feces, or both are kept clean, receive timely, dignified, and appropriate incontinence care aimed at maintaining skin integrity, promoting comfort, and preserving resident dignity while preventing infection and complications. Observations on morning of Sunday, February 8, 2026, in room [ROOM NUMBER]-D, Resident R131 was sitting in wheelchair with strong urine odor present in the room and bed linens stripped off of bed. Review of Resident R25's clinical record revealed medical diagnosis of overactive bladder, traumatic brain injury, bladder and bowel incontinence. Review of facility provided grievance report, completed on November 20, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the dietary services for the residents, meal tray delivery by the nursing staff and food and nutrition department staff, reviews of dietary policies and procedures, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of meal tray evaluations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foods being served to the residents were palatable and appetizing temperatures for one of three nursing units reviewed. (200 nursing unit) Findings include:A review of the undated dietary policy and procedure titled serving of food revealed that it was the responsibility of the food and nutrition services department to prepare and serve food in a manner to prevent food borne illness and meet the individual needs of each resident. The policy indicated that hot entree, starches and vegetables were to be served to the residents at or above 120 degrees Fahrenheit. A group meeting was held with alert and oriented residents at 10:30 a.m., on February 9, 2026. The residents reported being unsatisfied with the taste and temperature of the foods and beverages that were being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, job descriptions, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper procedures were followed in the facility related to failure to ensure residents are free from abuse and neglect relating to bruising of unknown origin, emptying ileostomy bag, wound care and incontinent care for six of 29 residents reviewed. (Resident R2, R25, R26, R47, R45, R100). Further determined, that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper procedures were followed in the facility related to establishing and maintaining an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program including the utilization of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact resident care and failed to adequately educate staff on evidence-based infection control practices for residents on four of four nursing units (NPRU…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccination status of employees was tracked and documented in accordance with regulatory requirements. Review of facility records revealed that the facility was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that it tracked and recorded the COVID-19 vaccination status of facility staff, including whether staff were fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, had approved exemptions, or had pending vaccination status as required by regulation. Interview with the Infection Preventionist, Employee E12 on February 8, 2026, at approximately 1:40 p.m., Employee E12 confirmed the facility did not maintain a system to consistently track and document employees' COVID-19 vaccination status in accordance with regulatory requirements. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.19(5) Personnel Records

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the operations within the food and nutrition department, interviews with staff, it was determined that essential equipment used to maintain the air temperature in the main kitchen was not fully functioning. Observations of the main kitchen at 9:45 a.m. and 11:45 a.m., on February 8, 2026, revealed that all dietary staff were wearing knit hats and sweatshirts while working in the main kitchen. The dietary staff were reporting that it was extremely cold in the kitchen over the past two months. Interview with a dietary aide, Employee E 20 revealed that it was a necessity to wear extra layers of clothing everyday while preforming dietary tasks due to the air temperature inside the kitchen presenting an uncomfortable work environment. Observations of the vent above the dish machine revealed that cold air was free flowing into the main kitchen form the outdoor winter weather. The exhaust fan was not properly functioning by way of pulling air out of the kitchen. Observations of the air temperature throughout the main kitchen with the maintenance director, Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the physical environment throughout the facility, reviews of pest control visits and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the building was pest free, in one of three nursing units (200 nursing unit) and in the food and nutrition department.Findings include: Observations of the 200-nursing unit 10:15 a.m., on February 8, 2026, revealed that the double metal doors leading directly outside the building were not sealed properly. The threshold of the door allowed easy access for pests and rodents to enter the facility. A two-inch gap was observed at the bottom of the metal doors upon closing. Interview with the maintenance director, Employee E24 at 9:15 a.m., on February 9, 2026, confirmed the repairs necessary to prevent pests and rodent entry. Observations of the main kitchen of the food and nutrition department revealed that mice droppings were identified around the perimeter of the flooring throughout the dry food storage area. The dry food storage room contained a wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that this facility failed to ensure that intravenous fluids were administered in a timely manner to one resident for whom the IV fluids have been ordered. (Resident R1)Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Insertion of Peripheral IV Catheter (undated) revealed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a safe and aseptic insertion of an intravenous catheter for the admission of intravenous fluids and medications. The maximum number of venipunctures attempts on one resident is two per IV nurse. If unsuccessful after two attempts the facility must consult the contracted, IV company to insert a line. Review of facility's community IV (intravenous) company contract (undated) revealed, the IV vendor will ensure all nurses who are dispatched to perform placement of vascular access devices on patients identified by the facility are duly experienced and competent in iv access and licensed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, and interview with staff, it was determined that facility failed to develop and implement a care plan related to hygiene care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Care Plans,' indicates that a care plan is developed in order to identify and maintain the highest level of functioning that a resident may be expected to attain. Each resident's comprehensive care plan has been designed to: incorporate identified problem areas.Review of Resident R2 (BIMS 99) clinical record on Wednesday, September 3rd, 2025, revealed a [AGE] year old male resident, admitted to facility on March 1, 2024, with medical diagnosis of quadriplegia, Parkinson's disease ( a disorder of central nervous system that affects movement, including tremors ), myocardial infarction, malnutrition, heart failure, chronic kidney disease - stage 3, gastrostomy status, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for one of 28 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident R100) Findings include: Review of nursing note for Resident R100, dated February 17, 2025, revealed that Resident R100 was transferred to hospital emergency room for low hemoglobin levels. Further review of Resident R100's clinical record revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident and his representative were provided with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of Resident R100's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, on February 27, 2025, at 3:24 p.m. that Resident R100 and his representative were not provided with the bed hold policy, that included information explaining the duration of the bed-hold, bed hold reserve payment and permitting return to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review,and review of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a resident care plan realted to a wrist fracture for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R85) Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled ongoing care plan updates revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to develop and update the comprehensive care plan to include resident's goals, preferences, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Clinical record review revealed a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] indicated that this resident was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated that Resident R85 had impaired upper and lower extremities. The assessment also indicated that Resident R85 was totally dependent on staff for rolling left to right and chair to bed/bed to chair transfers. Clinical record revealed that this resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services with a resident who exhibited a contracture of the hand for one of seven residents reviewed s. (Resident R85) Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled activities of daily living revealed that the facility was responsible for ensuring that residents receive assistance as needed for bathing, showering, dressing, grooming, betting out of bed, walking toileting and eating. The policy also indicated that special equipment would be provided as need for each resident. The policy said that the resident's care plan would reflect the appropriate level of care and personal preferences of each resident for activities of daily living. Clinical record review for Resident R85 revealed a quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs) dated September 8, 2024 that indicated that Resident R85 had functional impairments of the upper and lower extremities. The assessment also indicated that this resident was fully dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, clinical record review, interview with staff, and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that for one of two residents reviewed with enteral nutrition that appropriate and timely treatment, to prevent complications of gastrojejunostomy tube feeding was implemented. (Resident R65) Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled Enteral Nutrition revealed that adequate nutritional support would be provided to residents that were unable to consume adequate nutritional intake by mouth. The policy indicated that enteral feeding orders would be written to ensure consistent volume infusion. The policy indicated that the dietitian was responsible for assessment of the gastrostomy or jejunostomy (surgical creation of an opening (stoma) through the skin at the front of the abdomen and the wall of the jejunum (part of the small intestine).tube feeding ) with the nurse. Clinical record review for Resident R65 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of 28 residents sampled (Resident R 27) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Interviewed with Social worker, Employee E15 on February 26, 2025, at 2:10, revealed that the resident R27's PTSD triggers is unknown by facility. Resident R27's current care plan on February 24, 2025, revealed a care plan for PTSD. Further review of the care plan did not address resident's actual diagnoses/condition of PTSD, identifying the resident's past experiences and possible triggers that may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and policies and procedure reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of six residents reviewed was being monitored and assesed for continued use of psychotropic medication. (Resident R19) Finding include: A review of the undated policy titled psychotropic medication revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to ensure that psychotropic medications were being monitored and used properly. According to the policy psychotropic medications were drugs that effect brain activity with mental processing and behaviors. The policy indicated that as needed psychotropic medications were limited to fourteen days. The policy also indicated that if the prescriber wanted the as needed medication to be extended then the reason must be documented in the medical record and the duration of the as needed medication must also be indicated in the order for the psychotropic medication. Clinical record review for Resident R19 revealed a quarterly Minimun Data Set (MDS-an assessment of care needs) dated January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the food and nutrition services department, interviews with staff, it was determined that essential food service equipment and mechanical devices were not operating efficiently and effectively in the main kitchen. Findings include: Observations of the three compartment sink on February 24, 2025 revealed that the sink compartment used to sanitize the pots, pans, utencils, trays and cooking equipment was not holding water and the sanitizing solution. When tested the water and chemical were not at the proper concentration, according to the manufacturers recommendations. Upon further investigation the piping mechanism underneath the sinks were leaking water onto the floor. Interview with the Director of Dietary Services, Employee E13, on February 26, 2025 confirmed that this sink bay did not have the commercial sink drain and stopper to hold the chemical sanitizer and water concentration to effectively sanitize the pots, pans, utencils, trays and cooking equipment. Observations on February 24, 2025 of the metal doors leading directly from the main kitchen, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plan was updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Ongoing Care Plan Updates dated November 2028 revealed To develop a comprehensive care plan is developed that incorporates the resident's goals, preference, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. A review of the clinical file revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further examination of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not recorded. This omission suggests that the resident was unable to participate in the assessment due to severe cognitive impairment. A review of the clinical progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and and policy and procedure review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were follow for one of ten residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled administering medications August 18, 2022 revealed that medications and treatments were to be administrated in a safe and timely manner as prescribed by the physician. The policy also indicated that medications and treatments must be administered in accordance with the physician's orders, including any required time frame or parameters as specified by the physician. This policy said that if the drug was withheld the individual administering the medication was responsible to use the correct documentation on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) space provided for that drug. The policy indicated that the person administering the medication was responsible for recording the date and time of administration. A review of the policy titled physicians' medication orders dated August 18, 2024 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and and policy and procedure review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a doppler study was completed as ordered by the physician for one of ten residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R1 was readmitted to the nursing facility on August 16, 2024 with a diagnosis of replaced dislodged DOB Hoff tube (used for enteral feedings and medications for residents with swallowing problems), aspiration pneumonitis, and respiratory failure. Clinical record review revealed that the nurse practitioner's progress note dated August 22, 2024 indicated that Resident R1 was ordered a doppler (a test to estimate the blood flow through your blood vessels) study of the left arm due to swelling and pain. There was no doppler study of the left arm completed and available for review. Clinical record review revealed that the nurse practitioner ordered a STAT (emergency) doppler study for acute pain and swelling of the left arm for Resident R1 at 12:30 p.m., on August 23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, review of physican orders and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete documetation related to blood pressure for one of ten residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled administering medications August 18, 2022 revealed that medications and treatments were to be administrated in a safe and timely manner as prescribed by the physician. The policy also indicated that medications and treatments must be administered in accordance with the physician's orders, including any required time frame or parameters as specified by the physician. This policy said that if the drug was withheld the individual administering the medication was responsible to use the correct documentation on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) space provided for that drug. The policy indicated that the person administering the medication was responsible for recording the date and time of administration. Clinical record review revealed that Resident R1 was readmitted to the nursing facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers and discharges for five of six residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R4, R5 and R6). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R1 revealed a nurse's note, dated May 3, 2024, at 8:10 p.m. which indicated that the resident had abnormal vital signs, including low blood pressure and high heart rate. The physician was notified and ordered for the resident to be transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Continued clinical record review for Resident R1 revealed a nurse's note, dated June 15, 2024, at 10:01 a.m. which indicated that the resident was unresponsive with labored breathing. Emergency medical services were called and the resident was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Continued clinical record review for Resident R1 revealed a nurse's note, dated August 7, 2024, at 7:26 a.m. which indicated that the resident had two episodes of vomiting. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatments and services to promote healing, for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated June 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder (condition of bladder control problems dur to brain injury), paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement), spinal cord injury and muscle weakness. Continued review revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that continence care was provided in a timely manner for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated June 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including neurogenic bladder (condition of bladder control problems dur to brain injury), paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement), spinal cord injury and muscle weakness. Continued review revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed that the resident was dependent for toileting and always incontinent of bowel and bladder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer prevention measures were followed as ordered by the physician for one of one resident with pressure ulcer reviewed. (Resident R69) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Prevention of Pressure Ulcers,' indicates that when in bed, every attempt should be made to 'float heels' (keep heels off of the bed) by placing a pillow from knee to ankle or with other devices as recommended by therapist and prescribed by the physician. Review of Resident R69's clinical records revealed past medical history of cerebral infarction, anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, anemia, long-term anticoagulant use, gastrostomy status, and ventilator status. Review of February 2024 physican orders revealed an order revised on February 8, 2023 to wear prevalon boots to BLE (bilateral legs) at all times except for hygiene or skin checks. Continued review of physician orders revealed another order dated April 15, 2022 to off load heels with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for three of 34 residents reviewed. (Residents R38, Resident R41, Resident R390). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Disposable Equipment Changes undated states, Policy Statement- Respiratory care disposable equipment changes are consistent with manufacturer's recommendations, CDC guidelines and per Respiratory Care Clinical Practice Guidelines. Purpose-To establish guidelines for consistent changes of disposable equipment. To limit the occurrence of equipment related infection. To assure disposable equipment maintains both its physical integrity and proper function. Please note: All equipment (disposable/Non-disposable) including: nasal cannulas, aerosol tubing, nebulizer caps and tubing, treatment nebs, BIPAP/CPAP tubing and masks, must be stored in a clean set-up bad when not in use (between usage). Review of facility policy titled Tracheostomy Care undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to hot water temperatures which resulted in Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that, The primary purpose of your job position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. The job description of the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that, The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of our Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility, and as may be director by the Administrator and the Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents records were accurately documented for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R69) Findings include: Review of Resident R69's clinical records revealed that the resident was [AGE] year old female with past medical history of cerebral infarction, anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, anemia, long-term anticoagulant use, gastrostomy status, and ventilator status. Resident R69's physician is Employee, E38. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R69's progress notes revealed a pulmonary progress note dated March 14, 2024 at 6:30 pm, completed by physician, Employee E39, which was not the resident's physician. The progress notes stated seen and examined 3/14/24 [AGE] year old male admitted in December after falling from bed. Found to have C4-5 fracture and underwent surgery as listed below. He put placed back on the vent due to pneumonia . Interval Recommendation - 2/16/24 Continue vent support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention practice during medication administration for two of 27 residents reviewed. (Resident R6 and Resident R90) Findings include: Review of facility's policy title Administering Medications, revealed that medications shall be administered in safe and timely manner and as prescribed. No medications are kept on top of the cart. During observation of medication administration with Licensed nurse, Employee E36, on April 17, 2024 at 9:37 a.m. revealed an un-capped and pre-filled insulin syringe on top of cart. Employee E36 was observed carrying the un-capped insulin syringe to Resident R69's room and place it on bed side table. Employee E36 was observed to attempt to open new Lacosamide oral solution 10mg/ml bottle with her keys. Further observations revealed Employee E36 attempting to collect urine from Resident R69's foley by placing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,664 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,664 — penalty dated 2024-04-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARISTACARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHALOM UBROCHA EH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 04/01/2024
COHEN, CHAYAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 03/01/2010
GREENBERGER, SIDNEYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2006
KLEIN, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2006
WEISEL, MORRISIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 03/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$32.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.1M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 8%Other / private 8%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$634per resident / day
operating cost
$19,273per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$644per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next