No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Redbank Center For Rehabilitation And Healing

100 Chapin Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (732) 741-8811 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (732) 741-8811 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2023
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
331 Newman Springs Rd Ste 143 · (732) 934-6463 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
224 Shrewsbury Ave · (732) 530-2880 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.6 mi
179 Newman Springs Rd E · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
112 William St · (732) 542-3400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms41.4%12.1%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.6%97.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine22.5%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%8.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.832.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.111.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.4%CMS range 34.8–63.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.3–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.6–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 166.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided according to assessments and care plans for five of six residents (Resident (R) 5, R87, R92, R112, and R121) reviewed for activities out of the 32 sample residents This failure had the potential to affect the residents social and mental status. Findings include: 1. Review of R5's admission Record face sheet located in the admission Record tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, congestive heart failure (CHF), peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/16/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of the MDS further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and washed hands after touching face and contaminated items while touching food and plates with the same contaminated gloves in one of one kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infection and food borne illness for 132 of 141 residents consuming food in the facility. Findings include: On 02/25/25 at 11:25 AM, Cook1 was observed touching his face and nose with his gloved hands. At 11:35 AM, he began serving food off the steam table without first changing his gloves. While serving he was observed picking the fried fish filets up with his gloved hands not using utensils, removing sandwiches and chicken strips out of the oven with his gloved hands. At 11:47 AM, he picked up visibly soiled cooking mitts and placed one on each of his gloved hands, opened the oven door, removed a pan of fish, and placed it in the steam table. He took the oven mitts off and continued to serve the food touching the serving utensils, the top side of the plates and taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for two of four residents (Resident (R) 92 and R107) reviewed for EBP and failed to ensure medications were handled properly for one of four residents (R101) reviewed for medication administration of 32 sample residents. In addition, isolation supplies were not readily available on one out of four floors of the facility. These failures put all residents at risk of infection. Findings include: 1. During observations on [DATE] from 9:50 AM- 2:41 PM for rooms 316, 317, 319, 325, 326, and 328, EBP signage was located. Review of the signage for EBP located on the door caddie or wall of the rooms revealed everyone must clean their hands including before entering the room and when leaving the room. The signage further revealed providers, and staff must also put on gloves and a gown when doing high contact care which included changing a brief,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 107, R129, and R92) out of 32 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This had the potential to cause the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of R107's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included osteomyelitis, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction. Review of R107's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2025 revealed an order for oxygen at 4 LPM [liters per minute] via trach signed off each shift from 01/21/25 to 01/31/25. Another order for tracheostomy care every shift was signed off from 01/21/25 to 01/31/25. Review of R107's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a new level one Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when a psychiatric diagnosis was identified for one of three residents (Resident (R) 20) and failed to ensure level II was conducted for one of three residents (R101) reviewed for PASARR out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential for a failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the residents needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate. Findings include: 1. Review of R20's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] without a psychiatric diagnosis. Review of R20's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screen, located in the Misc tab of the EMR, revealed the hospital completed the form on 09/01/23 and documented no diagnosis or evidence of a major mental illness. Review of R20's admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for three of 32 sample residents (Resident (R) 13, R56, and R121) reviewed for care plans specific to vision, oxygen use, and boots for skin protection. The failures had the potential to affect resident care. Findings include: 1. Review of R13's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and heart failure. Review of R13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/25 and located in the resident's EMR MDS tab, revealed R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R13 had impaired vision. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed, Triggers due to visual deficits. This puts resident at risk for falls and safety issues and decreased socialization and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper incontinence care assistance to avoid double briefing for one of two residents (Resident (R) 92) reviewed for incontinence care of 32 sample residents. This failure put R92 at risk of pressure sore formation and skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of R92's admission Record face sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the admission Record tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization with diagnoses of non-traumatic acute subdural hemorrhage, anoxic brain damage, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, convulsions, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins, quadriplegia, hypertension, and sepsis. Review of R92's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/24 revealed R92 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) available.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for two of 32 sample residents (Resident (R) 121 and R89) reviewed for orders regarding boots to prevent skin breakdown for R121 and dressing change for R89. This failure put residents at risk for skin breakdown, infection, and worsening contractures. Findings include: 1. Review of R121's admission Record face sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the admission Record tab, revealed R121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of zygomatic fracture right side, stable burst facture of fourth thoracic vertebra, stable burst fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, and wedge compression fracture of the second lumbar vertebra. Review of R121's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/25 revealed R121 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed dose for one of six residents (Residents (R) 56) reviewed for respiratory care out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential to cause residents' respiratory distress. Findings include: Review of R56's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a hospital stay from 12/28/24 to 01/06/25. R56 had diagnoses of bronchiectasis, with onset date of 01/07/25, and acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, dated 01/09/25. Review of the Orders tab of R56's EMR revealed an order, dated 01/06/25, for oxygen at 2 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula every shift. Review of R56's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 which indicated R56 had moderately impaired cognition. R56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a meal or snack was provided and that there was ongoing pre- and post-dialysis communication for a resident receiving dialysis three times a week for one of one resident (Resident (R) 13) reviewed for dialysis out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential to affect the nutritional status and health of residents receiving dialysis. Findings include: Review of R13's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and heart failure. Review of R13's Care Plan section of the EMR revealed a focus area, dated 07/20/23, [Resident] needs hemodialysis three times a week with interventions including: Vital signs are taken before and after dialysis. The Care Plan also included a focus for R13 being at risk for altered weight status [related to] edema . [hemodialysis]/fluid fluctuations.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropics were not prescribed beyond 14 days without documented rational, for one of five residents (Resident (R) 101) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 32 sample residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to excessive medication administration. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, a history of mental and behavioral disorders, end stage renal disease, and general anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/27/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Review of R101's Order tab of the EMR, revealed an order for Clonazepam 2MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was less than 5% error rate which included gabapentin, scheduled for every eight hours was administered one hour and 39 minutes after the scheduled time; calcium acetate, which had been discontinued, was administered; and one tablet of estradiol was administered instead of two for one of four residents (Resident (R) 101) observed during medication administration of 32 sample residents. Medication errors have the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of R101's admission Record under the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R101 had diagnoses which included hypothyroidism and failure to thrive. Review of R101's Orders tab of the EMR, revealed orders which included: -Estradiol 2 milligrams (mg). Give two tablets daily and one tablet every evening, both ordered 12/31/24, for hormone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that three of six medication carts, located on all three floors of the facility, were secure when staff were not present. This had the potential to affect the health of all residents with medications on those carts and the safety of any resident who might open the cart and remove medications. Findings include: Observations of one of two medication carts on the third floor on 02/23/25 revealed: -From 11:25 AM until 11:34 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 walked away and went into a resident's room leaving the medication cart unlocked. Five residents were seated in wheelchairs in the hall within twenty feet of the cart, located across the hall from the Dayroom. -At 11:34 AM, RN1 returned to the medication cart. RN1 removed medication and walked into another resident's room at 11:35 AM, leaving the cart unlocked and unattended. -From 12:20 PM until 12:24 PM, the medication cart was observed in the same location as previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete records for two of four residents (Resident (R) 127 and R129) related to the death in facility for R127 and related to being discharged to the community for R129; reviewed for medical records of 32 sample residents. Failure to completely document the circumstances around resident discharge had the potential to result in staff not knowing why the resident was no longer in the facility; not knowing if the physician and family were notified; and potential legal ramifications. Findings include: 1. Review of R127's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was discharged on 12/29/24 at 7:20 AM and the resident was discharged to the funeral home. Review of the resident's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/29/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she had a death in facility. Review of the EMR in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-11 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and submit discharge Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 17 of 17 residents (Resident #9, #17, #35, #47, #57, #82, #85, #93, #94, #96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #101, #102, and #110) system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator who stated she had been working alone on MDS for about five months, and the facility had been looking for additional help without success. At this time, the surveyor provided the MDS Coordinator with a list of thirty-seven system selected residents identified as having an MDS record that was over 120 days overdue. The MDS Coordinator was asked to provide the survey team with the date the last MDS was submitted and the next MDS that was due, as well as if the resident remained in the facility or had been discharged . On 1/5/23 at 9:14 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator who stated that she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-11 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews of Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) in order to provide specific education based on the outcomes of the reviews. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #1 was hired on 9/11/08. Review of CNA #1's personnel file reflected there was no current performance evaluations completed for CNA #1. 2. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #2 was hired on 11/5/14. Review of CNA #2's personnel file reflected there was no current performance evaluations completed for CNA #2. 3. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #3 was hired on 11/8/93. Review of CNA #3's personnel file reflected there was no current performance evaluations completed for CNA #3. 4. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #4 was hired on 9/23/19. Review of CNA #4's personnel file reflected there were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to employee staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service in the role of the Food Service Director (FSD) in the absence of a full-time Registered Dietitian. This deficient practice would affect all residents and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor entered the kitchen and asked to tour with the FSD. The Dietary Aide (DA) stated he was temporarily filling in for the FSD who has been out on leave since May. The DA stated he had no certifications in dietary management, food service management and safety or have a degree in food service management. The DA stated he was employed at the facility for many years and was just helping while the FSD was out. The DA stated that a sister facility's FSD could help out and was certified. The surveyor asked if any of the other employees in the kitchen had food safety certification, and the DA stated no. The surveyor requested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the dish machine in use maintained the appropriate temperature according to the manufacturer's specifications; b.) maintain multiuse food-contact surface cutting board in a manner to prevent microbial growth; c.) store, label, and date potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; d.) discard potentially hazardous foods past their date of expiration; and e.) maintain storage areas in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor entered the kitchen and asked to tour with the Food Service Director (FSD). The Dietary Aide (DA) stated he was temporarily filling in for the FSD who has been out on leave since May. The DA stated he had no certifications in food service management and safety, dietary management, or have a degree in food service management. The DA stated he was employed at the facility for many years and was just helping while the FSD was out. The DA stated that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the systemic implementation of their antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice was identified while reviewing Resident #29 for use of antibiotics for a urinary tract infection and has the potential to affect all residents. The evidence was as follows: On 1/3/23 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #29 lying in bed. The resident had a urinary catheter in a privacy bag that was positioned below the bladder. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #29. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was readmitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty breathing), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the part of the body controlled by nerves), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by ensuring all new employees were screened for potential abuse by conducting reference checks from previous and current employers. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 staff (Staff #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for newly hired employees and was evidenced by the following: On 1/9/23 at 2:50 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) to provide the survey team with the personnel and health files for five selected newly hired employees (Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) in the past four months. A review of the facility's HMNR Abuse Prevention policy dated 2022, included [facility name] will protect the resident/patient right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, mental abuse, corporal punishment, misappropriation of property and involuntary seclusion .This policy will be accomplished through the seven components of abuse prevention: screening of potential staff .Screening: prospective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for newly admitted residents with significant weight loss. This deficient practiced was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19 and #59) reviewed for unplanned weight loss and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 lying in bed asleep with an enteral formula (formula administered via tube feeding (a tube inserted into the stomach wall to provide nutrition)) hanging on a tube feeding pole not being administered. The resident appeared to be very thin. On 1/3/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN) who stated the Second-Floor nursing unit did not have a weight book for the residents' weights; she kept all the residents' weights on a spreadsheet on her personal computer. The UM/LPN stated she reviewed the weights and gave a copy of the weights to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to a.) ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 forms) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 1 of 1 forms provided; b.) ensure the DEA 222 forms were dated and signed as of the day it was submitted for filling for 4 of 7 forms provided; and c.) to accurately document the administration of controlled medication for 2 sampled residents (Resident #52 and Resident #61) identified upon inspection of 1 of 3 medication carts. The evidence was as follows: 1. On 1/6/23 at 9:43 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed four of the seven provided forms had been pre-signed by the facility's Medical Director prior to submission to the provider pharmacy for filling. The forms were as follows: Order form number: 220240368; 220240367; 220317342; and 220317341. On 1/6/23 at 1:56 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose and maintain waste in garbage dumpster areas. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 6 garbage dumpsters in 1 of 2 garbage disposal areas and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 8:15 AM, the surveyor observed the garbage dumpster area which contained five garbage dumpsters. Out of the five garbage dumpsters, one of the garbage dumpster's lids was opened exposing its contents. The surveyor observed high levels of debris surrounding all five garbage dumpsters on all four sides. The debris included but was not limited to disposable gloves, boxes, paper, bottles, and other debris. On 1/5/23 at 8:11 AM, the surveyor observed the garbage dumpster area which contained five garbage dumpsters. Out of the five garbage dumpsters, one of the garbage dumpster's lids was opened exposing its contents. The surveyor observed high levels of debris surrounding all five garbage dumpsters on all four sides. The debris included but was not limited to disposable gloves, boxes, paper,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least every thirty days. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for physician visits and evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 lying in bed asleep. The resident appeared to be thin. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #19. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2016 with diagnoses which included iron deficiency anemia, type II diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar II disorder. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/11/22, reflected the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for no cheese by ensuring a resident did not receive cheese tortellini which was listed on their meal ticket preference as no cheese. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for food choices, and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #23 awake lying in bed. The resident informed the surveyor he/she was unhappy with the kitchen because they sent inappropriate foods to them. The resident continued they had a recent diagnosis of lactose intolerance and was supposed to receive lactaid milk and no cheese. The resident stated the facility sent them dishes with cheese last week which included chicken cordon blue and pizza. The resident stated he/she informed the kitchen and as an alternative was given a burger with no bun because the kitchen did not have any buns. The resident stated his/her meal ticket also indicated no corned beef and he/she received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards of practice and procedures to prevent the risk of infection and promote healing. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #33) observed during wound treatments and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #33 in bed with his/her eyes open. The resident did not respond to the surveyor. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #33. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2017 with diagnoses that included parastomal hernia (incision that allows protrusion of abdominal contents through the abdominal wall), infection, colostomy (surgical procedure connecting the colon to the abdominal wall), schizophrenia, intestinal obstruction, and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 7/25/22, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-10-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and medical record review, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) transcribe orders to the electronic physician's orders and medication administration record (eMAR), for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for tube feeding, (Resident #32) and b.) obtain a physician's order to apply, monitor and care for a resident wearing a multipodus boot (a device worn to protect and correct from contractures), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning (Resident #124). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states, The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-10-28 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician face to face visits were conducted and progress notes were documented at least every 60 days. This deficient practice was identified for Resident # 90, 1 of 26 residents reviewed for the timeliness of physician progress notes and was evidenced by the following: On 10/22/20 at 10:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #90 lying in bed awake with a urinary catheter bag that was enclosed within a privacy bag on the floor to the right of the resident's bed. The surveyor reviewed the Resident Face Sheet contained within the medical record of Resident #90, which revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses that included: Retention of urine, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of Resident #90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment tool) dated 09/06/2020, revealed that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score was three, which indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was identified that the facility failed to: a.) appropriately dispose of sharps equipment in accordance with infection control guidelines b.) sanitize a multi-use equipment blood pressure cuff between resident's during the medication pass observation in accordance with infection control guidelines, and c.) properly clean and replace a soiled privacy curtain for a resident. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units, (Second Floor which included six out of thirty rooms), for 1 of 1 unsampled resident during the medication pass observation, and in 1 of 26 resident's rooms, (Resident # 24). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/22/20 at 10:55 AM, the surveyor entered Resident #24's room who resided on the third floor and observed the resident lying in bed. Two staff members were observed cleaning the resident's room. The surveyor looked down at the floor by the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITE CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RB SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/17/2023
CH RB HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 07/17/2023
CW RB HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 07/17/2023
SEAM NY 2020 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST48%since 07/17/2023
CZH INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/17/2023
KOI EQUITIES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/17/2023
SK RB HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/17/2023
HERZKA, CHAIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/17/2023
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
BERKOWITZ, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/17/2023
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/26/2022
KLEIN, SOLOMONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
WOLOFSKY, CHAVAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2022
INFINITE CARE CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
NATIONAL DATACARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
RB SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
RB SNF OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
AHMAD, NASIRIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
JARIWALA, PUNITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MUILLIGAN, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/17/2024
NUSSBAUM, MOSHEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
PICK, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
WAHL, EZRIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
RB SNF CONSULTING HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
RB SNF REALTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2022
AMERICAN PLAN ADMINISTRATORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
MYITCREW INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
RB SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/12/2022
RYTES COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
STREAMLINE VERIFY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023
ZUNTA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

21 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-65.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 2%Other / private 28%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$470per resident / day
operating cost
$14,295per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315286. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next