Yonkers Gardens Center For Nursing And Rehab
115 South Broadway, Yonkers, NY 10701 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (914) 378-7358 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $98,914 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.8% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 48.6% | 19.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.7% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.7% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.9% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 6.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.3% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 13.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 23.0% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.7% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.36 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.4%CMS range 29.1–51.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.5–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.3–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 194.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME] Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehab F600 J, Event ID: DSWK11 Exit Date 5/28/2025 Due Date 6/11/2025 [NAME] NR /[NAME] Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00367662), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents on 9/20/2024 and 12/23/2024 and there was no documented evidence the facility revised care plans or implemented interventions and/or physician orders to prevent the resident from sexually abusing other residents. Subsequently, on 1/5/2025, Resident #1 was observed by Certified Nurse Aide #1 half-naked in bed, on top of Resident #2, who at the time of this incident was a severely cognitively impaired resident with their mouth on Resident #2's genital area. After this incident, Resident #1 was moved to a different unit on a different floor. However, during the same week of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards for one Resident (#5) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #5 with a known history of polysubstance abuse was not supervised to prevent the availability of non-prescribed drugs and their usage within the facility. Resident #5 had suspected drug overdoses that occurred in the facility on 12/9/2023, 1/5/24,1/10/24, 1/18/24, 1/23/24, and 1/29/24 for which Narcan (an opioid reversal agent) had to be administered by facility staff. Resident #5 continued to obtain illicit drugs which required hospitalization. The facility failed to initiate an investigation into the drug overdoses or update the care plan for Resident #5. This resulted in the likelihood for serious injury or death that was Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #5 and 9 other residents with a history of polysubstance use disorder. A facility policy titled Resident Possession of Illegal Substance revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/5/2026 to 2/12/2026, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food safety practice. The facility also did not maintain essential kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary condition. Specifically, observations revealed expired food items stored in the walk-in refrigerator. An opened and uncovered box of frozen vegetables was observed in the walk-in freezer. Sandwiches and cold cuts prepared for distribution were wrapped in plastic but lacked proper labeling. The glass doors of the countertop hot box food warmers were observed to be covered with large brown and black accumulations of burned grease. During tray line observation, the cook was not wearing a beard covering. A Food Service Worker was observed using unlabeled bottles of grape jelly in food preparation. The faucets at the pot wash sink were observed to be dripping despite being turned off. The floor area adjacent to the hot box warmers was observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on (2) two of (5) five resident floors (floors 3 and 4). Specifically,1) resident room/s on floor 3 had bathroom fixtures in disrepair, bedroom furniture, doors/walls with stains/scratches, and a soiled stained mechanical lift, and 2) resident room/s on floor 4 had a clock hanging off the wall, a damaged radiator, patched and mismatched wall paint, stained and warped ceiling tiles, dried rust-colored stains on walls/radiators, and a resident hall bathroom on floor 4 had a soiled and stained privacy curtain. The findings include:The policy titled Homelike Environment dated 11/30/2025 documented the facility will provide housekeeping and maintenance services as necessary to maintain a sanitary environment. During observation from 02/05/2026 at 10:08 AM to 02/11/2026 at 3:05 PM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for three (3) of six (6) residents (Resident #11, #7, and #78) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, 1) Resident #11 was not provided with staff assistance to perform facial hair grooming, 2) Resident #7 was not provided with staff assistance to take showers, and 3) Resident #78 was not provided with staff assistance to shower or groom their facial hair.The findings are:The facility policy and procedure, Activities of Daily Living Total Care last reviewed on 12/2025, documented all caregivers, nurses, and staff involved in the direct care of residents or patients who require assistance with activities of daily living, including but not limited to assist with oral care, hair care, shaving, nail care, and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview conducted during the 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026 Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure appropriate storage of medications in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for one (1) of 10 medication carts and two (2) of six (6) medication rooms. Specifically, one (1) medication cart on the 6th floor was observed unlocked and unattended, and one (1) medication room on the 5th floor was observed unlocked/unattended and contained methadone for Resident #119 and #156 that was stored in the same locked cabinet with other narcotics.The findings include:The 12/2025 policy titled methadone use documented the facility will maintain the use of methadone for pain or management of addiction in accordance with state and federal regulations. When methadone is prescribed for narcotic addiction only methadone must be stored separately from other controlled medications in a double locked cabinet designated for that purpose.During observation on 02/05/2026 at 11:15 AM the 5th floor medication room was unlocked. The cabinets over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview during recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, facility personnel did not ensure linens were handled and stored in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically, linens and towels were exposed and stored on top of hampers in resident rooms, and dirty linens were on the floor in the 4th and 5th floor shower rooms. The findings include: The policy titled Handling of Linens dated 11/2025 documented the facility will ensure that all linens are handled, stored, processed and transported to prevent the spread of infection. Staff will handle all used linen as potentially contaminated and will bag linen at the point of use. During observation on 02/06/2026 at 9:59 AM clean linens, and towels were stored on top of resident hampers in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].During observation on 02/09/2026 10:49 AM clean linens were stored on top of the resident hamper in room [ROOM NUMBER].During observation on 02/09/2026 at 10:52 AM dirty linens were in a pile on the floor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, 1) the designated smoking area had a substantial amount of cigarette butts and ice and snow covering on the ground, and 2) elevator #1 had damaged wall paneling and air vent grates. The findings includeThe policy titled Homelike Environment dated 11/30/2025 documented the facility will maintain outdoor areas for the safety and access of residents and visitors to ensure grounds, walkways, and entrances are free of tobacco-related waste. During observation on 02/05/2026 at 1:49 PM and 02/06/2026 at 10:00 AM, the designated outdoor smoking area had a large accumulation of snow and ice bordering a narrow-shoveled path from the door of the facility to a group of benches to the left. There were more than 50 cigarette butts littering the ground and mixed in with the ice and snow.During observation on 02/05/2026 at 12:25 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2669870), from 02/05/2026-02/12/2026 the facility did not ensure an effective pest control program was maintained for 3 (three) of 5 (five) residential floors (4th, 5th, and 6th floor) in the facility. Specifically, a roach was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], residents and staff voiced complaints regarding roaches and mice, and the pest control company logs for the past 6 (six) months documented the ongoing presence of roaches on the resident units.Findings include:During an interview on 02/05/2026 at 9:56 AM, Resident #209 stated when they were in the bathroom they saw cockroaches on the floor. During an interview on 02/05/2026 at 10:14 AM, Resident #92 stated there were a lot of mice and roaches. They stated they told the housekeeper and the housekeeper said they could not do anything about it.During an observation on 02/06/2026 at 9:59 AM, there was a pest trap, with dead bugs stuck on, in room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during a recertification survey from 02/05/2026 through 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for one (1) of four (4) residents (Residents #181) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, the phlebotomist drew blood from Resident #181 in the dining room area where residents were waiting for lunch. The findings include:Resident # 181 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to cerebral infarction, epilepsy and hypertension.Resident Rights policy last reviewed May 2025 documented for any procedure that involves direct resident care, provide for the resident's privacy.The 12/15/2025 Minimum Data Set admission assessment documented Resident #181 was cognitively impaired, no behavior.During an observation on 02/06/2026 at 12:49PM, in the dining room where residents were waiting for lunch, a phlebotomist was observed with their tray of supplies in front of Resident # 181. The phlebotomist was observed removing the resident's left sweater sleeve and drew blood from Resident #181's left arm. The phlebotomist walked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the recertification survey from 2/5/2026 to 2/12/2026 the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self determination through support of the resident's choices for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #7) reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident # 7 was not allowed to choose their bedtime. Findings include:Resident # 7 had diagnoses including hypertension, hepatitis and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 5/27/2025 documented that resident # 7 had intact cognition and it was somewhat important to the resident to be able to choose their bedtime.The comprehensive care plan for Behavior Disturbance last updated 01/10/2026 documented to give the resident as many choices as possible about care and activities.During an interview on 02/10/2026 at 12:32 PM, the resident stated that the staff tell them when they have to go to bed. They stated that they did not like to go to bed early and it was their preference to stay up later. Additionally, they stated that they did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure quarterly statements of the resident's financial record were made available for (1) one of (2) two residents (Resident #78) reviewed for Personal Funds. Specifically, there was no evidence quarterly statements of Resident #78's personal funds account was provided to the resident's Designated Representative. The findings include:Resident #78 had diagnoses of dementia and hydrocephalus.The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #78 had severe cognitive impairment and their family participated in the assessment. On 02/06/2026 at 12:14 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Resident #78's Designated Representative and they stated they used to receive quarterly statements of Resident #78's personal funds account activity until approximately 18 months ago. The Designated Representative stated they called the facility's business office…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (2584489) survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure that alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, or neglect were thoroughly investigated for one (1) of five (5) residents. (Resident #140) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, for Resident #140 there was no documented evidence the facility conducted a complete and thorough investigation, including statements, after Resident #140's family member reported the resident was beaten in the shower by certified nurse aides. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure on Abuse Prevention, revised 12/2025, were documented to provide a proactive and systematic approach to protecting residents' rights from harm related to abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property. The facility protected residents' rights to be free from physical abuse and ensured that residents were not subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey 02/05/2026 - 0212/2026 the facility did not ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment was completed within the 14-day requirement for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, a significant change Minimum Data Set was not initiated within 14 days for Resident #2 who had weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months, a decline in activities of daily living, a decline in cognition and a decline in urinary continence. The findings include:The October 2025 policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set documented ensure accurate and timely completion of the Minimum Data Set in accordance with the State and Federal Operation Manuals. Assessments will be completed by members of the interdisciplinary team in accordance with the completion date as determined by the Minimum Data Set Director. For comprehensive assessments that require completion of Care Area Assessments all disciplines will be required to complete the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 2/05/2026 to 2/12/2026, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set Assessments were submitted within 14 days after the facility completed the resident's assessment for two (2) of two (2) (Resident #83 and #96) residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set. Specifically, Resident #83 and #96's Minimum Data Set Assessments were completed on 10/07/2025, and were not transmitted until 02/09/2026. The findings include:Minimum Data Set Policy and Procedure dated October 2025, documented it was the policy for timely completion of the Minimum Data Set in accordance with the State and Federal Operation Manuals.Review of the submissions revealed:- Resident # 83 Discharge Minimum Data Set 3.0, with an assessment reference date of 09/22/2025 and completion date of 10/07/2025, was transmitted on 02/09/2026.- Resident #96 Discharge Minimum Data Set 3.0, with an assessment reference date of 09/26/2025 and completion date of 10/07/2025, was transmitted on 02/09/2026.During the interview on 02/10/2026 at 10:10 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set assessment accurately reflects the resident's status for (1) one of (3) three residents (Resident # 46) reviewed for Smoking. Specifically, the 12/10/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment was not accurately coded to reflect Resident #46's use of tobacco. The findings include:The October 2025 policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set documented ensure accurate and timely completion of the Minimum Data Set in accordance with the State and Federal Operation Manuals. The assessments will be completed by members of the interdisciplinary team in accordance with the completion date as determined by the Minimum Data Set Director. For comprehensive assessments that require completion of Care Area Assessments all disciplines will be required to complete the Minimum Data Set as assigned.Resident #46 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to opioid dependence, acute kidney failure and obesity.The 12/04/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for smoking. Specifically, Resident #19 was not reassessed for their ability to smoke safely and care plan interventions to prevent future noncompliance were not developed and implemented following the resident's noncompliance with facility smoking rules. The findings are:The facility policy titled Smoking dated 05/2025 documented smoking restrictions shall be strictly enforced in all nonsmoking areas. The staff should consult the Director of Nursing and Physician to determine restrictions on a resident's smoking privileges.Resident #19 had diagnoses of adjustment disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and nicotine dependence. The comprehensive Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #92 had a physician order for oxygen via nasal canula at 4 liters per minute, and was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 2 liters per minute. The findings include:Resident #92 had diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and Asthma.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #92's cognition was intact, the resident required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living, and the resident used oxygen.The physician order dated 08/26/2025 documented continuous oxygen at 4 liters via nasal canula. The Oxygen Therapy Care Plan dated 01/26/26 documented oxygen at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (2650146) from 02/05/2026 to 02/12/2026, the facility did not ensure medications were available to meet the needs of each resident for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, when Resident #205 was re-admitted to the facility, Methadone was unavailable for timely administration.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure, Methadone Use last reviewed on 12/2025, documented when methadone is prescribed for narcotic addiction only: the resident is certified as a patient of an identified Opioid Treatment Program which will supply the methadone, prior to admission to the facility.Resident #205 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including opioid abuse with unspecified opioid-induced disorder, anxiety disorder and obstructive uropathy,The Minimum Data Set (resident assessment) dated 10/12/2025 documented Resident #205 was cognitively intact and received opioid medication 7 of 7 days. The 10/6/2025 Physician Order documented Methadone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2669870), the facility did not ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that put forth good faith attempts to identify and correct quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was aware of ongoing sightings of roaches and mice (see F925) and there was no evidence a QAPI plan was in place to to address pest control. The findings include:The Facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Policy, last revised in March 2025, documented establishing a QAPI committee/subcommittee that works in tandem with the facility leadership and the Quality Assessment & Assurance committee.A review of the 2025 Quarterly Meeting Attendance Sheets titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Employee Sign in Sheets for 4/8/2025, 7/23/2025 and 11/12/25 documented topics for discussion.The 4/8/2025 topics/agenda included Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement for Plan of Correction on staffing, dignity, maintenance repairs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 2/5/2026 to 2/12/2026, the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Committee consisted at a minimum of the Infection Control Practitioner, the Medical Director, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. Specifically, the Infection Control Practitioner did not participate in Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement meetings for three (03) out of the three (03) quarterly meetings in 2025. The findings include:The Facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Policy, last revised in March 2025, documented establishing a QAPI committee/subcommittee that works in tandem with the facility leadership and the Quality Assessment & Assurance committee.A review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee members documented the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Director of Social Services, Minimum Data Set Coordinator, Medical Director, Infection Preventionist, and two (02) Registered Nurse Unit Managers.A review of the 2025 Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during abbreviated surveys (NY00378486, NY00339264 and NY00343082), the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2 and #3) reviewed for elopement. Specifically, 1) on 4/20/2025 at approximately 7:00 PM Resident #1 walked unsupervised through the facility's alarmed rear exit patio door through the tunnel to the hospital emergency department, was evaluated and returned to the facility on 4/20/2025 at 11:00 PM in stable condition, and 2) on 04/14/2024 sometime after 7:10 PM Resident #2 exited the facility unsupervised and ambulated to a friend's house, the resident was picked up by facility staff and evaluated at the emergency room and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 11:50 PM in stable condition, and 3) Resident #3 was last seen at the facility on 05/22/2024 at 4:00 PM and was not found until 05/23/2024 by the police.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY00367662), the facility did not ensure an alleged violation involving abuse was reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours of occurrence. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 1/5/2025 at 1:30 PM, Resident #1 was found in bed with Resident #2 who was severely cognitively impaired Resident #1 was half naked on top of Resident #2 with their mouth on Resident #2's genital area. Administration was made aware of this event on 1/5/2025 at 1:43PM. The facility did not report the incident to the New York State Department of Health until 1/5/2025 at 4:10PM. The Findings are: The Facility's Abuse policy revised 5/2024 documented that the resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse. The facility promotes any effort to prevent abuse. The facility will report any Incident and/or violation where Abuse, Neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of property is suspected to the New York State Department of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00367662) it was determined for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1), the facility did not ensure a sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated and ensure residents safety during the investigation. Specifically, Resident #1 was found half naked on top of Resident #2 with their mouth on Resident #2's genital area. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation, did not assess both residents and did not send both residents to the hospital for medical evaluation. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy revised on 5/2024 documented that the resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse. The facility promotes any effort to prevent abuse. The facility's policy titled Accident and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting revised on 05/2024 documented all accidents or incidents involving residents shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. A head-to-toe assessment shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during abbreviated survey (NY00367662), the facility did not review and revise the comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives, time frames and appropriate interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents on 9/20/2024 and 12/23/2024 and there was no documented evidence the facility revised care plans or implemented interventions and/or physician orders to prevent the resident from abusing other residents. The findings include: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 09/2024 documented an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Care plans are revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate. Care plans are reviewed at least quarterly. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Vascular Dementia. The 6/18/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00337354), the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a dignified existence. This was evident for 5 out of 6 residents (Resident #4, #12, #13, #14, #15) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, (1) During an observation on 12/13/2024, the 6th floor unit hallway had 4 residents (Resident #4, #12, #13, #14) dressed in hospital gowns; (2) During an observation on 12/13/2024 on the 5th floor dining room, Registered Nurse #1 was standing over Resident #15 while assisting them with their meal. The findings are: The Facility Resident's Rights Policy last reviewed 5/2024 documented the purpose was to provide general guidelines for resident rights while caring for the resident. Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on residents' rights including resident dignity and respect. During an observation on the 6th floor on 12/13/2024 between12:34 PM to 12:54 PM, Residents were noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey ((NY00337504, NY00353121), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse. This was evident for 6 out of 9 residents (Resident #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9). Specifically, (1) on 3/28/2024 Resident #2 hit Resident #5 with their walker after a verbal altercation in the hallway. Resident #5 sustained bruising to their left hand and chest area. (2) On 5/2/2024, Resident #2 and Resident #4 who resided in the same room engaged in a physical altercation. Resident #4 sustained a laceration to their chin and Resident #2 sustained a laceration to their left eyebrow. On 8/23/2024, Resident #2 was witnessed by staff hitting Resident #4 in the arm, while they were in the hallway without being provoked. Resident #4's room was changed after the 5/2/2024 incident, but they remained on the same unit as Resident #2 which increased the chance for another incident to occur; (3) On 11/2/2024, Resident #2 engaged in a physical altercation with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00337504, NY00353121) the facility did not ensure the report of the results of their investigation was submitted to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2, #6) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) Resident # 2 was witnessed hitting Resident #5 on their left hand with their walker on 3/28/2024. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 4/11/2024. 2)On 5/2/2024 Resident #2 engaged in a physical altercation with Resident #4 and resulted in injury to both residents. There was no documented evidence that a 5-day investigative conclusion report was submitted to the New York State department of Health. 3) On 11/2/2024 Resident #2 and Resident #3were engaged in a physical altercation and were found by staff on the floor hitting each other. Resident #3 sustained a superficial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00334737) the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident as determined by the facility staffing grid as necessary to meet the needs of the residents for 35-40 residents on the 3rd floor Dementia Unit. Specifically, review of the facility scheduled data sheets for January 2024, February 2024 and March 2024 revealed staffing was not adequate across various shifts based on the unit needs and Provider Average Ratio (PAR) levels documented on the staffing grid. The findings are: The facility Staffing policy last revised 5/2024 documented the facility must have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to: provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety. Providing care includes but is not limited to assessing, evaluating, planning, and implementing resident care plans and responding to resident's needs. Attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being of each resident. As…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00337354, NY00334737), the facility did not ensure the environment was functional, sanitary, and comfortable for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, on every unit in the facility there were multiple areas of chipped paint, scuff marks, visible dirt and stains on the walls and floors, base boards chipped and coming off the wall, holes in the walls, chipped tiles, caving ceiling tiles and foul odors. The findings are: The facility Resident Environmental Quality policy last revised 10/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to be designed, constructed, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for resident's staff and the public. During rounds on the units on 12/13/2024 from 12:34pm to 2:41pm the following was observed: On the 2nd floor there was chipped paint on the walls along the hallway. On the 3rd floor there was a light bulb out on the high side hallway, the walls were dirty and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00337354) the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, Resident #1 who was dependent on staff for all cares including rolling left to right acquired a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to their left hip during their stay at the facility. There was no documented physician order for turning and repositioning, and the certified nurse accountability form did not show that staff were consistently providing this care to the resident. The findings are: The facility Activities of Daily Living Total Care Policy last reviewed July 2024 documented the purpose is to establish guidelines for providing comprehensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living to residents. It aims to ensure that each individual's basic needs are met while promoting dignity, independence, and comfort. Resident #1 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00337354, NY00337504, NY00353121, NY00334737), the facility did not ensure a facility-wide assessment was conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently. Specifically, the Facility Assessment did not identify individual staff assignments, systems for coordination, and continuity of care necessary to care for residents during both day-to-day operations including nights and weekends. Findings include: The Facility Assessment provided was last updated 11/7/2024 and last reviewed with the quality assurance and improvement committee on 9/18/2023. The staffing plan documented an example of the evaluation of overall number of facility staff needed to ensure a sufficient number of qualified staff is available to meet each residents needs. The table listed the position of staff by title, as well as the total number needed or average or range by position. Review of the Facility Assessment on 12/19/2024 revealed the assessment did not include the staffing plan, the requirements of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331536 and NY00330044), the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 was accused of alleged inappropriate touching by Resident #1 on 1/13/2024 and the facility failed to call 911 or notify local law enforcement. Local law enforcement was notified of the sexual abuse allegation on 1/14/2024 by the hospital emergency room staff when Resident #1 reported the allegation to hospital staff; (2) Facility progress note documented Resident #2's aggressive physical/verbal/sexual behaviors towards staff and residents on 12/19/2023, 12/20/2023 and 1/12/2024. There was no documented evidence that the incidents were investigated by the facility; (3) the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse involving Resident #3 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey(s) (NY00331536, NY00330044 and NY00332489) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) multiple residents and staff complained about short staffing, and how it delayed care to many of the residents 2) Observations of 1 CNA for an entire nursing unit who was also assigned provide continuous monitoring of Resident # (), and 3) analysis of the actual staffing schedule for 2/2/0224 showed the facility was below the minimum levels documented on the Facility Assessment. The findings are: The Facility Assessment, last revised January 24, 2024, documented the facility's staffing plan to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents at any given time on units 2,3,4,5, and 6 calls for the following staffing plan: 7:00AM-3:00pm shift: 2 registered nurses and 5 certified nursing assistants per floor 3:00PM-11:00PM: 1 licensed practical nurse and 3 certified nursing assistants per floor 11:00PM-7:30 AM: 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey/s (#NY00331536, NY00330044, and NY00332489), the facility did not ensure each resident was provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for abuse . Specifically, 1 )Resident #2 displayed sexually aggressive behaviors beginning in December 2023 and a plan was not developed or implemented to prevent recurrence until after an alleged incident of sexual abuse of Resident #1 that occurred on 1/13/2023; 2) Resident #5 suffered a known substance use disorder and no plan or interventions were put in place to prevent multiple hospitalizations for suspected overdoses during their stay in the facility; and 3) Resident # 4 exhibited a behavioral disturbance, and a plan was not developed or implemented to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey and extended survey (NY00332489), the facility did not ensure that all nursing staff were in-serviced in behavioral health care needs of residents. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that they provided nursing staff education on behavioral health between1/1/23 and 12/31/23. The findings are: A request was made for the Policy and Procedure related to In-services and Staff Education but was not received prior to the exit date of 2/7/2024. A Facility Assessment last updated on 1/24/24 documented that the facility had a capacity of 200 residents. The facility assessment documented common diagnoses of residents included but were not limited to psychiatric/mood disorder and offered mental health and behavior services to residents. The facility assessment documented that nursing staff received training and competencies upon hiring and then annually. It further documented that the facility ' s behavioral health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during abbreviated survey (NY00331536, NY0033004, NY00332489), the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 2 of 4 (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 had multiple documented incidents of sexual/physical and verbal aggression towards staff on 12/19/2023,12/20/2023,1/12/2024 and no new interventions were put in place to prevent further reoccurrence; (2) On 1/13/2024, Resident #1 reported to their assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (Staff # 21) that they were inappropriately touched by another resident (Resident #2). Resident #2's hat was found on Resident #1's bed and Resident #2's sweater was found on the ground next to the bed. Resident #1and #2 were assessed and transferred to the Emergency Room. Resident #1 was transferred from the emergency room to a hospital for further evaluation. The facility did not notify local law enforcement. Resident #2 was arrested for alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00332489) it was determined the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented to meet the residents needs for safety for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5). Specifically, Resident #5 with a known history of polysubstance abuse had suspected drug overdoses that occurred in the facility on 12/9/2023, 1/5/2024,1/10/2024, 1/18/2024, 1/23/2024, 1/29/2024, and 2/2/2024 for which Narcan (an opioid reversal agent) had to be administered by facility staff; Resident #5's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's known substance use disorder, was not updated to reflect the suspected overdoses. No new care plan interventions were put in place to ensure Resident #5's safety and prevent recurrent overdoses. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan documented each resident's comprehensive care plan has been designed to incorporate risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (#NY00332489, NY00331536, NY00330044), the facility did not ensure that the resident's Primary Care Physician (PCP) comprehensively reviewed the resident's total program of care including the resident's current condition, progress and problems in maintaining or improving their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and decisions about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #5 Resident #5 had suspected drug overdoses that occurred in the facility on 12/9/2023, 1/5/24,1/10/24, 1/18/24, 1/23/24, and 1/29/24 for which Narcan (an opioid reversal agent) had to be administered by facility staff. Resident #5's comprehensive care plan was not updated after episodes of overdose or illicit substance. The resident's physician (Physician #2) did not recommend new interventions including recommendations made by hospital after discharge.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during abbreviated surveys (NY00331536, NY00330044, and NY00332489) between 01/22/2024 and 02/07/2024, it was determined the facility was not administrated in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the 200 licensed bed facility did not operate with a full-time social worker from 8/12/2023 to 11/2/2023. The findings are: Refer to the following tag: F850: Qualifications of Social Worker greater than 120 Beds The Facility Survey Report, dated 8/9/2023 included the question: Has your facility ensured that employees and other persons providing residents services in your facility are licensed, registered or certified in accordance with applicable laws? The answer was checked, Yes. Under the heading Director of Social Work, the facility documented they employed a full-time social worker with a master's degree in social work. During an interview on 2/2/2024 at 10:25AM, the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — isolatedHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during abbreviated surveys (NY00331536, NY00330044, NY00332489), the facility with a licensed bed capacity of 200 beds was operating without a full-time social worker from 8/12/2023 to 11/2/2023. The findings are: A facility policy titled, 'Social Services', dated 2/2022, documented a facility with more than 120 beds will employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. The Facility Survey Report, dated 8/9/2023 included the question: Has your facility ensured that employees and other persons providing residents services in your facility are licensed, registered or certified in accordance with applicable laws? The answer was checked, Yes. Under the heading Director of Social Work, the facility documented they employed a full-time social worker with a master's degree in social work. During an interview on 2/2/2024 at 10:05 AM, the facility's Social Work Assistant #1 stated the facility did not have a full-time social worker from 8/12/2023-11/2/2023 and they assumed many responsibilities in the absence of a full-time social worker.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 8/11/23 to 8/15/23, it was determined the facility did not ensure a resident's care plan was revised to reflect the resident's change in condition for one of one resident (Resident #102) reviewed for Incontinence of Bowel and Bladder. Specifically, when Resident #102 had a decline in continence of bowel and bladder, the care plan was not updated. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plan, revealed that the resident's care plans would be revised as changes in the resident's condition dictates. Resident #102 had diagnoses including Schizophrenia, brain cancer, and obesity. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated December 09, 2022, documented the resident was always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent for bladder. An annual MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident was always continent of bowel and frequently incontinent of bladder. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey conducted from 8/9/23-8/15/23(NY00315357) the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #237 left the facility undetected by staff on 4/23/23 and was not found until 4/24/23 when the facility found the resident had been admitted to a hospital. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Elopement Prevention dated 10/2018, documented the facility will utilize all possible measures to maintain the safety and well-being of all residents. The facility will have systems and tools in place to prevent unsafe wandering and or elopement. Resident #237 had diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, and Major Depressive Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 2/10/23 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 8/9/23 to 8/15/23. The facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Medication storage. Specifically, Resident #64 had a bottle of unlabeled Mucinex at his bedside. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration revised 2/4/2020 documented medications should be administered as ordered by the physician. Only licensed Personnel are assigned responsibility preparing administering and recording medication. Resident #64 was admitted with Malignant Neoplasm of Esophagus, Dysphagia and Muscle wasting. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 5/5/23 revealed the resident had intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #64 had no swallowing disorder and required supervision and set up help only for eating. The Care Plan dated 9/6/2022, documented Resident #64 was at risk for aspiration related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 8/9/23 to 8/15/23, the facility did not properly establish and/or maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Specifically, (1) The facility could not provide evidence that a facility risk assessment was conducted annually to identify where waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility water system and 2) the facility did not update the Water Management Plan since July 2017. The findings are: The facility Legionella Water Management Program dated July 2017 documented the purpose of the water management program is to identify areas in the water systems where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread. 1) The facility did not provide any documented evidence that an Environmental Assessment of Water Systems in Healthcare Settings was performed and updated annually to minimize the risk of healthcare facility associated Legionella Species according to best practice standards and regulations. 2) The facility Water Management Program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey from 8/9/23 to 8/15/23, the facility did not ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to assuming the role. Specifically, the facility's designated IP who is the Director of Nursing Services (DON), did not have documented evidence of completed specialized training in infection prevention and control until 08/11/23. The findings are: During the annual survey Entrance Conference on 8/09/23 at 9:33 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) identified themselves as the Infection Preventionist since they started at the facility in October of 2022. When asked for proof of training, they stated they could not find it. On 8/11/23 at 02:30 PM, the DON presented a document titled Training Plan Proof of Completion as of 8/11/23 and included an attached copy of course modules. One of the modules had a completion date of 8/11/23. During an interview with the DON on 8/14/23 at 10:21 AM the DON stated they have a certificate of Proof of Training effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 8/9/23 to 8/15/23, the facility did not provide a COVID-19 vaccination for 1 (Resident #110) of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination after screening and consent was obtained. Specifically, Resident #110 had consent from 12/7/22 but had not received the vaccine when reviewed as of 8/14/23. Findings include: The facility policy titled COVID-19 Infection Control Policy, dated 2/11/2022, documented the updated COVID-19 vaccination will be offered within 14 days of admission/readmission. Resident #110 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dysphagia, Type II Diabetes, and Depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/10/23, documented the resident had cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use and received a gastrostomy tube feeding. The resident had a Consent for the COVID-19 immunization which was obtained 12/7/22. The resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during recertification and abbreviated (NY000320651) surveys from 8/9/23 to 8/15/23, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to ensure services were provided to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for accidents, and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #125) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, 1. Resident #73 did not have a plan of care to address skin assessment and treatment for a repair of laceration on their nose and 2. Resident #125 was identified with skin breakdown to the sacrum and there was no corresponding comprehensive care plan with interventions addressing the skin breakdown. The undated facility policy for Comprehensive Care Plan documents an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents medical, nursing, mental and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents ( Resident #86) received care in a dignified manner. Specifically, during wound care and diaper change the resident's door was left ajar exposing the resident's private areas to public view. The findings are: Resident #86 was admitted with diagnoses including; Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Neurogenic Bladder and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 4/9/19 indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. During the survey the following was observed: 5/21/19 at 9:33 AM- the door to the resident's room was ajar. A nurse was transferring the resident to a wheelchair and she was observed pulling up the resident's diaper and then pulling up the residents' pants. No curtain was drawn for privacy. Later, during the dressing change the nurse left the room and the resident was left lying on his right side facing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents or their representatives and the ombudsman were provided with written notification of their transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #45 and Resident #160) reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings are: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Quadriplegia and Neurogenic Bladder. The clinical record documented that resident #45 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 5/3/19 with a diagnosis of Bacteremia. Resident #45 was also admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. He returned to the facility on 5/13/19 with a diagnosis of Artificial Opening Status of Gastronomy Tube. There was no documented evidence that written notification for both hospitalizations on 4/26/19 and 5/11/19 was submitted to the Ombudsman. 2. Resident #160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-22 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview conducted during the most recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that two quarterly assessments utilizing the State approved instrument were conducted for 1 of 11 residents (#59) reviewed for resident assessment. The findings are: Resident #59 was admitted in 2013 and had an annual assessment utilizing the State approved instrument, Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed on 7/30/2018. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that no additional assessments utilizing the MDS were completed until 3/4/19 at which time an annual MDS was done. This resulted in two quarterly assessments not being done between 7/30/18 and 3/4/19. The MDS Nurse responsible for the completion of the resident's assessments was interviewed on 5/21/19 at 10:40 AM and stated she knew they were late in doing 2 quarterly assessments for Resident #59. Additionally, they had completed an annual assessment in March 2019 instead which is more comprehensive. The MDS Coordinator was interviewed on 5/22/19 at 9:43 AM. She stated that quarterly assessments are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised with measurable objectives, time frames and appropriate interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, the care plan 1. did not address the effectiveness of treatment to a left heel pressure injury identified on admission, 2. did not reflect the development and treatment of two new pressure ulcers, and 3. did not initiate new interventions to prevent further skin breakdown. The findings are: Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses and conditions including chronic viral Hepatitis C, Cerebral infarction and Diabetes Mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment tool) dated 4/5/19 documented the resident was cognitively intact, received total assist of two staff support for transfer, total assist of one staff support for toilet use and personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that the environment was free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident #153) The findings are: Resident #153 was admitted with diagnoses including; Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Right Above the Knee Amputation. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool) dated 1/28/19 documented that the resident is cognitively impaired and is dependent on 1 staff person for toileting, personal hygiene and dressing. Review of the comprehensive care plan initiated on admission revealed the following; Goals: Resident will be without injuries resulting from falls/Resident will have no further falls related to physical performance limitations (i.e. unsteady gait or Orthostatic Hypotension) within the next 90 days. Interventions: Anticipate needs of resident/encourage resident to seek assistance as needed/keep personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$98,914 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $61,636 — penalty dated 2025-05-28
- $37,278 — penalty dated 2024-02-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INFINITE CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDMAN, LEOPOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 20% | since 12/24/2015 |
| MELNICKE, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 68% | since 12/24/2015 |
| SKUTZKA, ALEXANDER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/08/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335515. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.