Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 454 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 236 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 300 beds and averages 273.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during abbreviated surveys #2607851 and #2580703 the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment was free of accident hazards and/or that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) on 09/03/2025 Resident #1 was transferred via Hoyer lift (mechanical device) by Certified Nurse Aide #1 and Private Aide #1, who was not approved to provide clinical or nursing care functions. Subsequently, Resident #1 sustained a hematoma (collection of blood) to the back of their head, and 2) on 08/03/2025 Resident #2 was transferred by Certified Nurse Aide #2 without the use of a Sara lift (mechanical sit-to-stand device) and an additional staff member as care planned. Subsequently, Resident #2 sustained a swollen knee that was red and warm to touch, and Resident #2 had complaints of pain. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 and Resident #2 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: The undated policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Hcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00350448, NY0035998, NY00343310, NY00351372) from 1/22/2025-1/29/2025, the facility failed to ensure that four (4) of six (6) residents' (Resident, #534 #70, #207, #65) environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. Specifically: 1. Resident #534 was not supervised to prevent a fall from a wheelchair, which resulted in three (3) fractured ribs and a fractured scapula (shoulder blade); 2. Resident #70 required a mechanical lift and two-person physical assist for transfers. Certified Nurse Aide #24 used a sit to stand assistance device and one person for the transfer, resulting in a painful bruise on the left side of the forehead; 3. Resident #207 required a two-person assist for bathing, toileting, and transfers as documented in their plan of care however the assigned aide provided a one-person assist for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-10-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The Facility did not take actions aimed at performance improvement, including the methods by which the facility will systematically identify, report, track, investigate, analyze, and use data and information to develop activities to prevent adverse events. Specifically, on 12/22/2025 during the onsite post survey, the facility did not convene a QAPI meeting to determine the root cause analysis for the deficient practice cited during the survey exited 10/23/2025. The last QAPI meeting was convened on 10/17/2025. The facility did not complete their Directed Plan of Correction imposed with a Category 1 remedy and failed to implement their Plan of Correction as directed by the State Agency by their deadline. As a result the Plan of Correction was not fully implemented by the credible alleged date of compliance of 12/16/2025.The first survey exited 10/23/25 and the facility did not have a QAPI meeting since 10/17/2025. The QA team did not convene 15 days after they received the statement of deficiencies. There was no Risk Assessment conducted to determine how they were in non-compliance.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey(NY00375662), the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1(Resident #1) of 3 reviewed for behaviors. Specifically, Resident #1 had a history of behaviors that included resisting Activities of a Daily Living cares from staff, and the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that a Behavior Care Plan was in place prior to 3/25/25. The Findings are: The 10/1/2018 Facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning documented that the Interdisciplinary Team(IDT) reviews the Care Plans during the care plan meeting, triggered and other care issues and ensure care plans are in place which address the issues, and reviews and updates care plans at least quarterly and more frequently as warranted by the resident's condition Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral and mood disturbances,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00375662), the facility did not ensure that adequate supervision and effective use of the facility's monitoring program to prevent falls and injuries were provided for 1 (Residents #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 3/20/2025, Resident #1 who had a history of falls and balance problems and required one-person assistance for toileting was left alone in the bathroom by Certified Nurse Aide #1. Resident #1 fell backwards which caused them to hit their head and sustain an abrasion to the posterior scalp with some bleeding. The Findings are: The 5/5/2015 Facility policy titled Falls Prevention and Management last updated 11/2024 documented that it is the facility policy to assess all Residents for risk of falling, and to implement person centered prevention plans as necessary. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with behavioral and mood disturbances, difficulty in walking, history of falling, and legal blindness. The 12/27/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00374143) the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect or mistreatment for 1(Resident #1) of 3 reviewed. Specifically, on 3/5/2025, Registered Nurse Supervisor#1 observed Certified Nurse Aide #1 pushing Resident #1 who is severely cognitively impaired, from the front in the hallway. Resident #1 stumbled backwards but did not fall. Certified Nurse Aide #1 was asked why they pushed the resident, and they responded, because he does not listen. The findings are: The Facility Policy titled Abuse/Neglect/Mistreatment-Prevention, Assessment & Reporting last revised on 11/4/2022 documented that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification Survey from 01/22/2025 through 01/30/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified dining experience for 3 of 35 sampled residents (Residents #585, #165, and #72). Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistant #17 and #21 referred to Resident #585 as a feeder during lunch service on 1/22/25, Certified Nurse Aide #36 was observed standing over Resident #165 while feeding them a lunch meal, and Certified Nurse Aide #37 was observed standing over Resident #72 while feeding them their meal. The findings include: The facility policy titled Nursing, Feeding of Residents Revised 5/21/14 documented the registered nurse will evaluate the resident needs for assistance with feeding and assign certified nurse assistants to assist with feeding accordingly. Communicates to the assigned certified nurse assistant resident need, preferences and limitation in process. Supervises the feeding process. Observes the feeding process.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00364240, NY00341828 and NY00353718)) from 1/22/25 to 1/30/25, the facility did not ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, upon review of the staffing schedule from December 22 2024 through January 29 2025, the facility did not consistently provide adequate staffing on all units/shifts to meet the needs of the residents. The findings are: A facility policy titled, Nursing Staffing (reviewed 9/24), documented an adequate number of staff consistent with the organization's mission, the scope of services provided, and the population served. Staff is hired with the qualifications that commensurate with the defined job responsibilities and applicable degrees/certifications. The Director of Nursing in conjunction with the department of Human Resources and the Administration of the Home will ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 1/22/25 to 1/30/25, the facility did not ensure a person centered comprehensive care plan was developed and/or implemented for 1 of 1 resident (#78) reviewed for Hospice Care. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed when Residents #78 was put on hospice care on 1/15/25. The findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dysphagia, cerebral aneurysm, and dementia without behaviors. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (resident assessment) dated 11/20/24 documented the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The 1/14/25 Health Status Note documented hospice came today to do a consult. As per the nurse practitioner the resident will start on hospice tomorrow 1/15/25. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed when Residents #78 was put on hospice care on 1/15/25. The 1/16/25 Social Service Note documented the social worker was informed hospice accepted the resident onto hospice care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey from 1/22/2025-1/30/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident maintained, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutrition and hydration status for one of two residents (Resident #163) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, for Resident #163 there was no documented evidence for the implementation of 960ml per day fluid restriction as per physician order. The finding is: The Policy & Procedure titled Nursing Intake and Output; Management of Fluid Restriction revised 12/2024 documented the purpose is to maintain an accurate record of resident's fluid intake and output with risk for dehydration or fluid overload. Procedure: Nurse initiates intake and output sheets and determines with the dietician the amount of fluids to be provided with meals, between meals, and with medications. The Dietician indicates on meal card Fluid Restriction, and monitors fluid provided at meals. The Certified Nurse Aide records intake and output and reports at the end of the shift. Resident #163 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted from 1/22/2025 to 1/30/2025, the facility did not ensure residents who required dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) received services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #163) reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of consistent assessment and oversight before, during and after dialysis treatment for Resident #163 who received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center. Findings include: Policy and Procedure Titled Hemodialysis dated November 2011 and last reviewed 10/29/2024 documented resident's receiving hemodialysis treatments will be monitored. If resident had an arteriovenous fistula check for the presence of thrill and bruit daily. The nurse's responsibility to document in the progress notes residents condition including vital sign, post dialysis, weight and presence of arteriovenous fistula's thrill and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/25 to 1/30/25, the facility did not ensure annual performance reviews for nursing staff were completed at least once every 12 months. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide annual performance reviews for 2 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (#14, #16) reviewed. The findings are: The facility policy titled Human Resources - Performance Appraisals - Competencies, revised 12/14, documented: It is the policy of the New Jewish Home to routinely and periodically appraise the job performance and competencies of each employee. Performance appraisals will be performed after the completion of the probationary period for all non-exempt staff and after the initial review period for exempt staff. Each employee is evaluated annually thereafter. During an interview and observation on 1/27/25 at 9:54 AM the Director of Human Resources stated departments were responsible for completing annual performance appraisals for certified nurse aides. They stated the human resource department sent notifications and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$163,020 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $163,020 — penalty dated 2025-01-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INFINITE CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY