Fishkill Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 153.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, during a recertification and extended survey from 1/2/2024 to 1/11/2024, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, a total of 26 residents on 2 of 2 resident floors were residing in 17 rooms where space heaters were in use (room M1, M2, R6, R2, R1, O1, O2, O3, O4, Q3, Q2, N1, N2 and N3 on the locked dementia unit with residents wandering in and out of the rooms, and rooms S1, S4, and X2). Additionally, facility staff reported that at times they had seen towels placed over the space heaters. Subsequently, residents were at risk for injury with the likelihood for harm or death that was Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the facility's 151 residents. The findings are: The facility admission History documented the facility admitted 21 residents in the month of October 2023, 21 residents in November 2023 and 13 residents in December 2023. These residents were admitted to rooms with heat. The undated policy titled Maintaining Electrical Equipment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, a review of the facility's fall risk assessment revealed that on 08/12/2025, Resident #1 was identified as a high risk for falls and further review of the resident's medical record revealed that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the resident from potential falls or to mitigate harm from actual falls. On 09/27/2025, Resident #1, had a fall and was found in their room on the floor and sustained a swollen right eye, a hematoma to the right side of their forehead and a scratch to their right forearm. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room for further evaluation. This failure to implement interventions to prevent and or mitigate harm from falls resulted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2650093), the facility did not ensure the residents representative were informed when there was a significant change in the resident's physical condition for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification. Specifically, Resident #1's had a fall and sustained injuries to the face, eyes and head on 09/27/2025. The family representative was not notified timely of the change in condition and physical status until they visited the resident on 10/30/2025. The findings are: The facility Accident and Incident policy last reviewed 02/12/2025 documented all accidents and incidents will be investigated and documented. The nurse manager or supervisor will notify the family or significant others regarding the accident or incident. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia and Altered Mental Status. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had severe cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (2650093) the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plans were reviewed, updated, and revised for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) Resident #1's cognitive impairment care plan had not been reviewed or updated since 10/18/2024. (2) Resident #3's cognitive impairment care plan had not been reviewed or updated since 08/27/2024.The findings are:The facility Comprehensive Care Planning policy last reviewed 02/14/2025 documented the interdisciplinary team: reviews care plans at a minimum of quarterly to ensure that all goals and interventions are current, appropriate and accurate and updates care plans as needed with changes in treatment, needs and conditions.1)Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia and Altered Mental Status.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted on 2/10/25-2/14/25, the facility did not ensure each staff and was screened, offered the most recent COVID-19 vaccine and provided education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine for 10 of 10 staff reviewed for COVID vaccines. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Staff were offered, and education was provided for COVID vaccination for Dietary Aide #15, Housekeeping #16, Certified Nurse Aide #17, #18, #20, Licensed Practical Nurse #19, Registered Nurse #21, Social Worker #22, Dining Supervisor #23 and [NAME] #24. Findings include: The facility policy titled Management of COVID-19 and dated 11/30/24, documented the facility will offer consenting personnel the opportunity to receive any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Signage throughout the facility reminding personnel and residents that the facility offers COVID-19 vaccination will be posted. During an observation on 02/13/25 at 3:56 PM there were no visible signage promoting COVID-19 vaccination.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that resident's dignity was maintained. Specifically,1) residents were being served milk and water in plastic storage cups with lids on 4 of 4 units (South 1, North 1, South 2 and North 2) and 2) and Certified Nurse Assistant #7 referred to Resident #26 as a feeder. In addition, a Resident progress note in the facility Electronic Medical Record also referred to Resident #26 as a feeder. The findings are: 1) Observations were made throughout survey from 2/10/25 to 2/14/25 on South 1, North 1, South 2 and North 2 units of residents being served milk and water out of plastic storage cups with lids. Observations were made on North 2 Unit on 2/10/25 at 12:24 PM and 2/11/25 at 12:21 PM, of residents being served milk and water out of plastic storage cups with lids. On 2/12/25 at 10:28 AM during the Resident Council Meeting 10 of 10 residents stated they were served milk and water in plastic storage cups and they preferred to use a hard plastic drinking cup. During interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was provided. Specifically, North 2 unit rooms (S3, X1, X3, X6, V1, V3) had broken tiles, cracked walls, hanging curtains or damaged windows, the shower room had a damaged drain and the the hall window was open, resulting in the resident in room V3 offering complaints of feeling cold. The Findings include: During observation on 2/10/25 at 10:09 AM room X6 tiles under the bed were broken and chipped. During observation on 2/10/25 at 10:15 AM room X3 tiles under the closet were damaged. During observation on 2/10/25 at 10:16 AM room V1 had a cracked wall at the bottom right corner of window. During observation on 2/12/25 at 12:16 PM room V3, resident complained it was cold and the thermometer in the room registered 74 degrees. The hall window was open and blowing cold air into the room. During observation on 2/12/25 t 12:17 PM room S3 window curtain was hanging off the window. There was no documented evidence of a work order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification Survey from 2/10-2/14/25 the facility did not ensure comprehensive person centered care plans were developed for 1 of 3 residents (#37) reviewed for Limited Range of Motion. Specifically, Resident #37 did not have a care plan with goals and interventions specific to the use of a cervical collar. The findings include: The Facility Policy titled Comprehensive Care last reviewed 7/2/2024, documented the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Resident #37 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Fracture, and Heart Failure. The Nursing Progress Note dated 1/4/25 documented Resident #37 was received at the facility at 4:30 PM, cervical collar in place. Cervical collar to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 2/10/25-2/14/25, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 (Resident # 15) residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, there were multiple omissions on the medication and treatment administration records for medications and treatments related to pain management for Resident #15. The findings include: The policy titled Administering Medications dated 4/20/2021 documented medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The individual administering the medication will document that the medication was administered. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall document the refusal. Resident #15 was admitted to facility with diagnoses that included Coronary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review during the recertification survey from 02/10/25 through 02/14/25, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months. Specifically, three of five Certified Nurse Aides (#2, #3, #4) did not have a performance review documented at least once every 12 months. Findings include: There was no documented evidence that performance reviews were completed in the last 12 months for Certified Nurse Aide #2 with a hire date of 2020, Certified Nurse Aide #3 with a hire date of 2018 and Certified Nurse Aide #4 with a hire date of 2017 During an interview on 2/13/25 at 10:42 AM the Human Resource Director stated unit supervisor/s were responsible for completion of Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews. The Human Resource Director stated Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews should be filed in employee folders, once completed. The Human Resource Director stated they did not realize Certified Nurse Aide performance reviews were not completed for Certified Nurse Aide #2, #3 and #4. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00341482) conducted from 1/10/25 to 1/14/25, the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one of one residents (Resident #399) reviewed for Neglect and Medications. Specifically, staff administered a medication not physician prescribed to Resident #399 which resulted in Resident #399 being transferred to an acute care hospital for evaluation. The findings include: Resident #399 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Chronic Hepatitis C, Diabetes Mellitus, and Liver Cirrhosis. The facility policy titled Administering Mediations dated 4/20/21 documented: medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident their medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: a. checking identification band; checking photograph attached to medical record; and c. if necessary, verifying resident identification with other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 2/10/25 through 2/14/25 the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, beverages stored in nutrition and storage refrigerator/s were not labeled and were outdated, and a parcel of flour was left open not dated on the shelf. Findings include: The facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage dated 6/26/2028 documented dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from the original package, labeled and dated (use by date). Beverages must be dated when opened and discarded after 3 days. Other opened containers must be dated and sealed or covered during storage. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 2/10/25 at 9:50 AM and the following were observed: - unlabeled 4 ounce cups were filled with white liquid dated 2/4, in the nutrition and storage refrigerator. - unlabeled 4 ounce cups were filled with brown liquid dated 2/4, in the nutrition and storage refrigerator. - unlabeled 4 ounce cups with thickened yellow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$44,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $44,500 — penalty dated 2024-01-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SAPPHIRE CARE GROUP — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY