Sapphire Nursing At Meadow Hill

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 165 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 184.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review completed during the Recertification Survey conducted 11/28/2022-12/7/2022 the facility did not ensure that a resident assessed as high risk for pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing and to promote healing of a facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcer for one of four residents (Resident #135) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, interventions and treatment measures were not implemented timely for Resident #135 who developed a facility acquired new and worsening stage 3 pressure ulcer. This resulted in actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy for Resident #135. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment dated 6/20/2019 with no revision date documented the staff at Sapphire will assess residents for risk of pressure ulcers in attempts to aid in prevention of pressure ulcers. The intent of the policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification survey from 3/26/2025 through 4/1/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified dining experience for 2 of 35 residents (Residents #2 and #113) reviewed for dignity while dining. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aides were observed standing over Resident #2 and Resident #113 while assisting with their meals. The findings include: The facility policy titled Quality of Life-Dignity dated 9/1/17 documented: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including malnutrition, non-Alzheimer dementia and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The Comprehensive Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living- Range of Motion dated 11/29/19 documented Resident #2 required extensive assistance of one person for eating. The 2/22/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/26/25 to 4/1/25, the facility did not ensure the Residents right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 1 of 35 resident rooms (Resident #10) and the hallways of 2 [NAME] Unit during observation of the environment. Specifically, Resident #10's room was observed with a strong odor of urine on multiple occasions and there was a strong odor of urine in hallways of 2 [NAME] unit. The findings included: The facility policy titled Homelike Environment reviewed 10/18/24 documented: It is the policy of facility to ensure that all Residents live in an environment that is clean and neat, with appropriate furnishings in a state of good repair. Resident #10 had diagnoses including hyperkalemia, repeated falls, and schizoaffective disorder. A significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent for toileting hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 3/26/2025-4/1/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (Residents #90) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of a Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #90, who required supervision with Activities of Daily Living, was observed during multiple observations with long, greasy hair, an unshaven face, and long, ungroomed fingernails. The findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Activities of Daily Living was last reviewed on 10/1/2024 and documented. This center's policy is to provide activities of daily living care to all residents based on an assessment of their needs. Resident #90 had diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, and hypertensive heart disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 3/13/2025 documented Resident #90 had severely impaired cognition and needed supervision or touching…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 3/26/2025- 4/1/2025, the facility did not ensure that needed services, care, and equipment were provided to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion and mobility maintained or improved function based on the resident's clinical condition for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for position and mobility. Specifically, Resident #40 was observed three times without a left palm guard in place, as ordered by the physician, to prevent further contractures. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure titled Issues of Splints, Orthoses, and Prostheses, last reviewed 8/17/2024, documented that the Nursing department will take responsibility for daily applications and removal of devices, and the Nurse Manager will be responsible for ensuring that the information is entered in the Certified Nurse Aide Accountability Record. Resident #40 had diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness, and a stroke affecting the left nondominant side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (resident assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/26/2025 to 4/1/25, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #129) reviewed for Respiratory Care was provided with such care, consistent with the professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #129, had a physician's order for oxygen to be administered via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute, and was observed with the oxygen rate not consistent with the physician's order. The findings include: The facility policy titled OxygenTherapy - Face Mask and Cannula (undated) documented: Oxygen is administered appropriately to residents to improve oxygenation and provide comfort to residents experiencing respiratory difficulties. Oxygen is administered by licensed staff. Oxygen administration requires physician order. Resident #129 had diagnoses including failure to thrive, cough, fatigue and diabetes. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 1/14/25, documented Resident #129 was severely cognitively impaired, aphasic, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey on 03/26/2025-04/01/2025, the facility did not ensure each staff was screened, offered the COVID-19 vaccine, and provided education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects associated with for 2 of 10 staff reviewed for COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of immunization records for Covid-19 vaccination for Certified Nurse Aide #1, and Certified Nurse Aide #2. Findings include: The facility policy titled COVID-19 revised 11/20/2024, documented it is the policy of the facility to follow the regulatory guidelines for COVID-19. In addition, providing all staff and residents who declined to be vaccinated a written affirmation of their signature, which indicates they were offered the opportunity for COVID-19 vaccination but declined. The New Hire Report dated 3/26/25, documented Certified Nurse Aide #1 was hired 3/19/25 and Certified Nurse Aide #2 was hired 3/5/25. The facility's immunization records for staff revealed Certified Nurse Aide #1 and #2 had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 03/26/2025 to 04/01/2025, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aides were provided the required hours of training and/or annual in-services on dementia care management to ensure safe delivery of care. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documentation that 3 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (#23, #24, and #25), had the required hours of the mandatory training. Findings include: The facility policy titled: Employees' Annual Mandatory Education, revised 11/28/2024, documented all staff must complete a series of mandatory annual education modules to comply with regulations and ensure high-quality resident care. The policy further states that completion records will be maintained by the Education Coordinator. A review of the facility's Certified Nurse Aide annual in-service training records revealed that the following Certified Nurse Aides did not meet the 12-hour annual training requirement and lacked documentation of mandatory dementia care management education: - Certified Nurse Aide #23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey from 3/26/25 to 4/1/25, the facility did not ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #129 and #118) reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, 1) Licensed Practical Nurse #21 and Certified Nurse #21 were observed providing cares to Resident #129, on enhanced barrier precautions, without donning a gown. 2) Resident #118 had an indwelling urinary catheter and the drainage bag and a portion of the drainage tube were lying on the floor. The findings are: The Policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed 1/6/25, documented: It is the policy of this facility to follow Center for Disease Control guidelines by utilizing Enhanced Barrier precautions in the care of patient susceptible to multiple drug-resistant organisms and to reduce the spread and prevalence of multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00337556, NY00340055, NY00348324) the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) out of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 3/30/2024, Resident #2 was witnessed by 2 certified nurse assistants(Staff #6 and Staff #7) being fondled under their shirt by Resident #3. Resident #2 was removed from Resident #3's room and Resident #2's shirt was pulled down by the certified nurse assistant. 2) On 4/22/2024, Resident #1 stated that a certified nurse assistant(Staff #1) was grabbing and pulling their right arm roughly while attempting to change their shirt and Resident #1 sustained an ecchymosis to the area.There was no care plan to address potential victim for abuse. Findings include: The facilities Resident Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation policy statement documented it is the policy of the facility that acts of physical, verbal, mental and financial abuse including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey and Abbreviate Survey (NY304719) conducted from 11/28/22 to 12/7/22, it was determined the facility did not ensure that a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained on 3 of 4 units (units 1 West, 1 East, and 2 West). Specifically, peeling wall paper, chipped paint, cracked broken plaster were observed in multiple resident rooms and dining room. The findings are: The facility Environmental Services Manager Job Description documented the primary purpose of the job position is to assure facility is maintained in an efficient, clean, safe, and comfortable manner. On 11/28/22 at 9:43 AM during a tour of unit 1 West, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 122 were noted with peeling discolored wall paper. On 11/29/22 at 9:55 AM during a tour of unit 2 West, room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted with peeling wall paper by the window and room door. Dark brown stains were noted underneath the peeling wall paper. On 12/2/22 03:03…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SAPPHIRE CARE GROUP — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY