Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 363 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 269 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 181.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.62 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY000330281) the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1, who has a diagnosis of dementia, was observed by Certified Nurse's Aide #1 sitting in their reclining wheelchair next to the nursing station drinking from a brown bottle labeled Wella Color Charm hair color which had been left unattended at the nursing station. Subsequently, Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital for swelling to the lips and tongue via 911 and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. This resulted in actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy. The findings are: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anemia (low blood count), Dementia (confusion), and High Blood Pressure. The review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review during survey, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected each resident's status. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #4) of one (1) resident reviewed for catheter. Specifically, Resident #4 was admitted without an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through the urethra or abdominal wall into the bladder to continuously drain the urine into an external bag). The admission 5-Day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] inaccurately documented that the resident had an indwelling catheter.The findings include:The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set Completion Assignment last reviewed 10/10/2025 documented the interdisciplinary team members are responsible for accurately completing and signing for their assigned sections on all initial, annual, quarterly, significant change, and Medicare assessments.Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (a noncancerous enlargement of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #146) of three (3) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #146 had physician's orders for oxygen therapy via nasal cannula two liters per minute as needed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 4/30/2026 the oxygen tubing label was dated 4/21/2026. The findings include: The facility policy for Oxygen Administration revised on 01/2026 documented the Physician will order oxygen therapy stating specific flow rate, diagnosis related to need for therapy and type of delivery device (nasal cannula, mask, venti-mask). Oxygen tubing (connecting tubing and nasal cannula) will be changed weekly, every Sunday during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift and as needed regardless of the administration orders. Resident #146…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's current medical and nursing needs was developed in a timely manner. This was identified for one (Resident #272) of two residents reviewed for Antibiotic use; for one (Resident #3) of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living; and for one (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1) Resident #272 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter line to the Right Upper Arm; however, there was no care plan developed for the use and care of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter line until 1/24/2025, 7 days after admission. 2) Resident #3 had a Comprehensive Care Plan developed for Activities of Daily Living including Mobility, Ambulation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. This was identified for one (Resident #31) of four residents reviewed for Vision and Hearing. Specifically, a plastic cup containing two bottles of Refresh Liquigel eye drops and two bottles of Systane Lubricant eye ointment medications were observed on Resident #31's bedside table on [DATE]. The Refresh Liquigel eye drops expiration date was documented as 8/2024 and the resident was observed to self-administer the expired eye drops. The finding is: The facility policy titled Storage of Medication dated 3/2023 documented that drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident's medications shall be assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area to prevent the possibility of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that injuries of unknown origin were reported by the covered individual including the Certified Nursing Assistants within 24 hours of identifying the injury. This was identified for one (Resident #273) of three residents reviewed for Skin Condition (non-pressure). Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #6 did not report a bruise of unknown origin on the back of Resident #273's left forearm when they identified the bruise on 1/18/2025. The finding is: The facility's Abuse Prevention policy dated 10/2022 documented that the facility staff are trained regarding the facility policies related to Abuse Prevention and Reporting at the time of orientation and at least annually thereafter. The orientation and in-service included but were not limited to identifying what constitutes abuse, neglect exploitation, and misappropriation of property, to report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure an assessment was completed to reflect the resident's status accurately. This was identified for one (Resident #128) of four residents reviewed for Dementia Care. Specifically, the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #128 dated 1/6/2025 inaccurately reflected the resident as comatose. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set Completion Assignment, last reviewed on 10/18/2023 documented that interdisciplinary care team members are assigned to specific Care Area Assessment which they have to document key findings regarding the resident's status based on the triggered care area. The care area assessment summary must be completed at the time of Minimum Data Set completion. The Minimum Data Set Coordinator is responsible for checking the completion of all Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments. Resident #128 was admitted with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team to reflect each resident's preferences and status after each assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #102) of six residents reviewed for Communication. Specifically, Resident #102 had a Physician's order to use bilateral hearing aides daily. The resident exhibited noncompliance and frequently removed the hearing aids; however, the comprehensive care plan for the hearing deficit was not updated to indicate the resident's behavior. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Care Plans dated 8/2022 documented the plan of care is reviewed on a quarterly and annual basis by the interdisciplinary team and or when the resident has a significant change in condition. Following the Minimum Data Set assessment schedule, the nursing department or designee will ensure that each care plan has been completed and updated within seven days of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident maintained, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #5 had an 8.48% significant weight loss in 90 days, from October 2024 to January 2025, which was not addressed by the Clinical Dietitian. The finding is: The facility's undated policy titled, Weight Monitoring documented, once weights have been recorded in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), the unit Clinical Dietitian will review the resident's weight status over the specified period of time to identify any residents who have experienced a significant weight change. Significant weight change is defined as 5% weight loss/gain in 30 days, 7.5% weight loss/gain in 90 days, and 10% weight loss/gain in 180 days. Residents experiencing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure that the medical care of each resident was supervised by the Physician including monitoring changes in the resident's medical status. This was identified for one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #5 had an 8.48% significant weight loss in 90 days, from October 2024 to January 2025, which was not addressed by their Primary Physician. The finding is: The facility's undated policy titled, Weight Monitoring documented, once weights have been recorded in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), the unit Clinical Dietitian will review the resident's weight status over the specified period of time to identify any residents who have experienced a significant weight change. Significant weight change is defined as 5% weight loss/gain in 30 days, 7.5% weight loss/gain in 90 days, and 10% weight loss/gain in 180 days. Residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00337758) initiated on 1/21/2025 and completed on 1/28/2025, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for each resident. This was identified for one ( Unit 2 East) of six nursing units during the Sufficient Staffing Task. Specifically, a review of the daily staffing sheets and grievance reports indicated that Unit 2 East did not have sufficient nursing staff available during the weekends to care for residents in March 2024. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Staffing dated 8/2001 documented that the facility will ensure that staff of sufficient size and appropriate qualifications is maintained in order to carry through the policies, programs, and responsibilities of the facility, as well as to provide quality care to its residents. A sufficient number of Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses will be available…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-04-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTIMA CARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY