Maple City Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 109.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · H2024-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (Resident #59 and #71) of two residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #59 was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] following surgical treatment of an abscess (a painful, swollen lump filled with pus) and did not have a follow up evaluation as ordered in a timely manner. Resident #71, who had a contracture (a shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that prevent normal joint movement which is often painful) of the left hand did not have a care plan in place that included measurable goals, interventions, or monitoring which resulted in multiple pressure ulcers and a decrease in range of motion. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #71 that was not Immediate Jeopardy and is evidenced by the following: 1. Resident #71 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not allow a resident the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident for one (Resident #31) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #31's side rails that were used to increase their independence and mobility in bed were removed by the facility as considered being a restraint without an appropriate assessment resulting in a fall out of bed with injury. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #31 that was not Immediate Jeopardy and is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Use of Side Rails, last reviewed January 2024, documented side rails are considered a restraint when they are used to limit the resident's freedom of movement. Side rails are permissible if they are used to treat a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0655 — widespread
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for 24 (Residents #1, #5, #22, #25, #27, #28, #37, #49, #58, #59, #61, #69, #73, #76, #79, #82, #83, #84, #85, #100, #109, #110, #161, #311) of 24 residents, the facility did not ensure that the baseline care plan (care plan developed within 48 hours of admission that includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of the resident) was completed within the required timeframe and that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or their representative. Specifically, for Residents #73 and #82, the facility could not provide evidence that a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. For Residents #1, #5, #22, #25, #27, #28, #37, #49, #58, #59, #61, #69, #76, #79, #83, #84, #85, #100, #109, #110, #161, and #311, the facility could not provide evidence that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00345323) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for two (first and second floors) of two resident-use floors, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, there were roof leaks, missing ceiling tiles, and resident care equipment was dirty. The findings are: Record review of a roof vendor work estimate, dated 07/19/2024, revealed: roof repairs on the Ballasted EPDM (ethylene propylene diene terpolymer; a durable synthetic roofing membrane) roof system as needed in the active leak location on the South side of the building. The notes section of this report listed: Although work will be performed per proper roofing practices and we will stand behind our work, no guarantees can be provided on repair work due to the condition of the existing roof systems. Record review of an undated email communication from the Environmental Services Director to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in accordance with State and Federal Laws for two (Unit One Hall A and Unit Two Hall A) of two medication carts and one (Unit Two) of two medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, medication carts contained expired medications, insulin without an open or expiration date, and one bottle of eye drops without any resident identifiers. Additionally, the medication room contained expired medications. This is evidenced by but not limited to the following: The undated facility policy and procedure, Storage of Medications, included drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. During an observation on 08/21/24 at 4:45 PM, the Unit Two Hall A medication cart had four bottles of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one of one main kitchen, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, non-food contact surfaces were dirty, utensils and dishware were dirty, floors were dirty, there was missing grout between floor tiles, a reach-in cooler was dirty, and food items were not stored 6 inches above the floor. The findings are: Record review of the facility sanitization policy and procedure, dated 01/2024, listed 2. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Seals, hinges and fasteners will be kept in good repair, 3. All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot water…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00338206) from 08/18/2024 through 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #5) of ten residents, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #5 was observed over several days with debris underneath their fingernails including while eating. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Care of Fingernails/Toenails, dated January 2024, documented that nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming. The policy included to remove dirt from around and under each nail. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness, depression, and arthritis. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 07/10/2024, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact, had highly impaired vision, and required moderate assistance with personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #16) of one resident, the facility did not ensure the resident received treatment and/or assistive devices to maintain hearing. Specifically, Resident #16 was hard of hearing, had a documented request to be seen for hearing aids, and the facility did not arrange for an audiology (hearing) evaluation. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #16 had diagnoses including diabetes, depression, and bilateral hearing loss. The Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment, dated 07/03/2024, included the resident was cognitively intact, was able to hear with minimal difficulty, and did not have hearing aids. During an interview on 08/19/2024 at 10:24 AM, Resident #16 stated when they were admitted , they were told the facility would help them get hearing aids. They were seen to get their ears cleaned and sent to a hearing specialist, but still had not been evaluated for hearing aids. Resident #16 stated their inability to hear affects them daily and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigations (NY00338206 and NY00337318) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to prevent urinary tract infections for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag) for one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #25 had a history of urinary tract infections and was observed on multiple occasions with their urinary catheter drainage bag, catheter drainage port, and catheter tubing lying directly on the floor without a barrier, and with the drainage bag completely full of urine resulting in a backup of urine in the tubing. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #25 had diagnoses including [NAME] disease (a rare genetic disorder that affects the kidneys), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the bladder does not work properly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #59) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings (nutrition administered via a tube inserted directly into the stomach via the abdomen due to the residents' inability to consume food and drink by mouth), the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #59's total daily intake of tube feedings was being monitored to ensure their nutritional needs were being met, physician's orders regarding administration of the tube feedings while consuming food were unclear, and free water flushes and nutritional supplements were not administered as ordered by the physician. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Enteral Nutrition (method of supplying nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract), dated reviewed January 2024, included that the enteral nutrition would be ordered by the physician based on the recommendations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 08/19/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one (Resident #85) of three residents, the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #85 was observed wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula (a device that delivers oxygen through a person's nose), did not have a physician order in place for oxygen use via a nasal cannula, and there was no documentation in the Medication Administration and Treatment Administration Records that reflected the use of oxygen via nasal cannula each shift. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Oxygen Administration. dated January 2024, included to verify and review a physician's order for oxygen administration. Resident #85 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea (disorder in which breathing stops and starts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and records review conducted during a Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (NY00345323) from 08/18/2024 to 08/23/2024, for one of one kitchen, the facility did not ensure there was an effective pest control program. Specifically, small brown flies and fruit flies were present and untreated. The findings are: The facility pest control policy dated 01/2024, documented the following: E. A complaint log will be maintained by the Maintenance Department. Whenever there is a complaint noted, a maintenance work order is to be sent to the Maintenance office. F. Monitoring of pest control is performed as part of the weekly environmental rounds conducted by Performance Improvement Committee designee, daily observations, and documentation by staff in the Maintenance/Engineering log located at all Nursing stations and Security Stations departmental rounds and preventative measures. Record review of the past three months of maintenance logs on units revealed no pest control concerns were noted by staff. Pest control vendor treatment records for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$62,207 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $62,207 — penalty dated 2024-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HURLBUT CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY