Latta Road Nursing Home East

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 36.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00348559) for one (1) (Resident #4) of three (3) residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet the residents needs as recommended by the speech-language pathologist and physician's orders. Specifically, Resident #4 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) with a history of choking, was on a ground/soft diet (food that is ground or minced into pieces no larger than a quarter inch and are moist) and had a choking episode related to incorrect food consistency, which resulted in hospitalization. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #4 that was not Immediate Jeopardy as evidenced by the following: The facility policy Aspiration Precautions Protocol, dated December 2023, documented that a resident's meal tray should be checked with the meal tray ticket or card for accuracy. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 04/14/2025 to 04/18/25, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for two (2) (Resident #186 and Resident #187) of the three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, both residents were discharged and there was no documented evidence that the facility provided the residents and/or their representatives with a Notice of Medicare Noncoverage letter (NOMNC) explaining their termination of Medicare A benefits and appeal rights as required by the regulations. The findings are: 1.Resident #186 was admitted on [DATE] under Medicare Part A benefits and discharged from the facility with days remaining on 01/13/2025. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that a Notice of Medicare Noncoverage letter was provided to Resident #186 or their representative following discharge from Medicare Part A services. 2. Resident #187 was admitted to the facility on 01/14 2025 under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey from 04/14/2025 to 04/18/2025, for one (1) (Resident #12) of one (1) resident reviewed, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (basic self-care tasks people perform regularly to maintain their well-being, such as bathing) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, Resident #12 was observed on several days with unwashed/greasy hair and long facial hair. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that Resident #12 had received a shower, had their hair washed or their facial hair trimmed for several weeks. The finding is: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting dated March 2018 documented that appropriate care, and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily livings independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 04/14/2025 to 04/18/2025, for one (1) (Resident #185) of one (1) resident reviewed, the facility did not provide specialized services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standard of practice. Specifically, Resident #185 was observed receiving oxygen therapy on several occasions without physician orders for oxygen, without a care plan for the goals and interventions related to oxygen use and without any documentation related to the daily monitoring of oxygen use. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Oxygen Administration, dated October 2010, included to verify there was a physician's order and to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula, and/or nasal catheter. Resident #185 was admitted to the facility 04/11/2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 04/14/2025 to 04/18/2025, the facility did not follow the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications for installing and maintaining bedrails for one (1) (Resident #16) of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #16 was observed in bed with the assist rail (a type of bed rail) not secured in the locked position. The finding is: The User-Service Manual, dated 2015, for the assist rails documented do not use this assist device until you have verified that it is locked in place. Injury to resident or caregiver may result if this procedure is not followed. Lock the assist handle by engaging the latch pin into the latch. Verify that the assist handle is locked prior to leaving any resident unattended. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included diabetes, anemia, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartrate). The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/26/2025 documented the resident was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 04/14/2025 to 04/18/2025, the facility did not maintain the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items were not labeled and dated, there was bare hand contact with ready to eat food, and a dishwashing machine was dirty. The findings are: Record review of the facility policy Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practice documented: Contact between food and bare (ungloved) hands is prohibited and gloves are to be worn when touching ready-to-eat foods. During observations and an interview on 04/14/2025 at 8:50 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen included the following items stored in a two-door, upright reach in cooler and were not labeled or dated: 12 sandwiches that appeared to be egg salad, a plastic bag of sliced ham, a small stainless-steel pan of red sauce and meatballs, and a small stainless-steel pan of red sauce. During an immediate interview Food Service Worker #1 stated that the sandwiches were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 04/14/2025 to 04/18/2025, the facility did not ensure they established and maintained an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 10 staff members reviewed. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #3 and Scheduler #1 did not receive the influenza vaccine and were observed not wearing face masks while in resident care areas during the current influenza season (as determined by the State Health Department). The finding is: The facility policy Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine updated November 2023 included that residents/resident representatives and employees of the facility would be offered to receive influenza vaccine annually. The resident/resident representative and employees would complete the Influenza Vaccine consent/declination form. If the employee chooses to decline the Influenza Vaccine, the declination form would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0729 — isolated
  Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00357033), the facility did not ensure that one (Certified Nursing Assistant [Aide] #4) of three Certified Nursing Assistants' certifications were current during the employees' employment at the facility. Specifically, the New York State Nurse Aide Registry Verification Report for Certified Nursing Assistant #4 documented their certification had lapsed (expired) effective [DATE] and not been renewed. Certified Nursing Assistant #4 continued to work in the facility with direct resident care for a period of time without a valid certification from the New York State Nurse Aide Registry (Prometric). This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Certificate Renewal, dated [DATE], included all Certified Nursing Assistants recertification would be monitored by the Director of Nursing on a monthly basis, and the certificate renewal process would start in the beginning of the month in which the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00348559) for one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that an incident was thoroughly investigated to rule out potential abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or a care plan violation. Specifically, Resident #4 had a choking episode that resulted in hospitalization. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence (including, but not limited to, statements from involved staff members or potential witnesses) that the incident was thoroughly investigated to rule out potential abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or a care plan violation. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Resident Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property-Prohibition, Investigation, and Reporting, dated 06/24/2024, documented the facility must have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. The facility policy Nurse Guidelines, Resident Incident Reports dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and complaint investigation (#NY00301222) 8/2/23 to 8/8/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and mistreatment the facility did not ensure that an investigation to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment was initiated in a timely manner. Specifically, Resident #9 reported to a staff member an incident where they were held down against their will and making them afraid was not investigated in a timely manner. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Prohibition, Training, Investigation, and Reporting Policy dated February 2022, documented that all allegations of violations involving an incident in which there is reasonable suspicion of resident abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injury of unknown source, mistreatment of a resident, exploitation or misappropriation of property/funds of a resident are to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 8/2/23 to 8/8/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #9) of 15 residents reviewed for care planning, the facility did not ensure that the resident's care plan was revised and updated to reflect their current medical condition. Specifically, Resident #9's care plan did not reflect their positioning preferences during care to prevent breathing difficulties. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Planning, dated effective 11/28/16 included that each resident will have a Comprehensive Resident Centered Care plan that is consistent with the resident's rights and person-centered care. Resident #9 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of oxygen) requiring oxygen and a newly placed cardiac pacemaker. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented that Resident #9 was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,979 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,979 — penalty dated 2025-01-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HURLBUT CARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NY