North Westchester Restorative Therapy & Nrsg Crt

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 598 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 208 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (677260 / NY00386237), the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) one (1) resident (Resident #124) reviewed for change in condition. Specifically, Resident #124's stool sample was not collected as ordered and there was no documented evidence that the Nurse Practitioner or the Physician were made aware that the stool sample had not been collected.The findings include:The 05/2025 policy for Physician's Notification of Orders, documented that when a physician or other authorized practitioner's order is not carried out as ordered, delayed, modified, or discontinued, the practitioner shall be notified.Resident #124 had diagnoses which included moderate persistent asthma, essential hypertension and spinal stenosis.The 10/25/2024 Certified Nurse Aide Care Guide documented Resident #124 was incontinent of bowel and required 2 staff assistance with toileting hygiene.The 10/27/2024 Care Plan for activities of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00375176) the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3) reviewed for medications. Specifically, (1) review of Resident #1's medication administration record for November 2024 revealed their blood pressure medication was not administered on 11/23/2024. There was no documented evidence of any hold parameters for Resident #1's medication and no documented evidence of the Physician being informed of the medication hold. Review of Resident #1's medication administration record for December 2024 revealed the resident refused their asthma medication on 12/11/2024 and their blood pressure medication on 12/12/2024 and 12/13/2024. There was documented evidence of the Physician being made aware of Resident #1's medication refusals. (2) Review of Resident #3's medication administration record revealed they refused all of their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00370400) the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #2 who had impairment to one upper extremity and was dependent on staff for toileting, bed mobility and transfers, did not have an at risk for abuse care plan in place. On 1/27/2025 Resident #2 reported to their representative that a certified nurse aide threw a television remote control at them, and it hit them in the face. The facility concluded the allegation was unfounded The Findings are: The facility Comprehensive Care Plans and Resident/Patient Meeting policy dated August 2024 documented a comprehensive care plan for resident's needs should be developed by 14 days of admission and no later than 21 days. Resident #2 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00370400), the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for documentation. Specifically, on 1/28/2025 Resident #2 reported to their representative that a Certified Nurse Assistant threw a television remote control at them hitting them on the face. Review of Resident #3's medical chart revealed no documented evidence of any nursing or medical assessment completed pertaining to Resident #2's allegation that occurred on 1/27/2025. The findings are: The facility Documentation policy last reviewed 9/14/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to document all information related to the patient's medical care either in the electronic medical record or in the resident's paper chart. The purpose is to maintain all information regarding the resident's care and treatment in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00367900), the facility did not ensure a resident with a communicable infection was isolated to prevent further spread of infection for 2 out of 3 (Resident #1, #2) residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, on [DATE] the facility identified Resident #2 as having a suspected case of Norovirus during a facility outbreak. Resident #2 was the roommate of Resident #1, who did not display any symptoms of the infection on [DATE]. Resident #1 remained in the same room with Resident #2 on the south unit, and Resident #1 subsequently acquired symptoms of the infection on [DATE]. Facility open bed census reviewed revealed available beds on the South unit on [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. Resident #1 expired in the facility on [DATE] from acute respiratory failure. The findings are: The facility Infection Prevention and Control Program policy last reviewed [DATE] documented the purpose is to prevent and control outbreaks and cross-contamination…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00349402), the facility did not ensure the resident's legal representative upon written request was provided with a copy of the resident's medical records within 2 working days advance notice to the facility as per Federal regulations for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medical records. Specifically, on 5/28/2024 Resident #3's representative requested via email copies of Resident #3's complete medical record and physical therapy records from the facility. Resident #3's representative submitted an Authorization for Release of Health Information form to the facility via email attachment on 6/16/2024. The facility did not provide Resident #3's representative with the copies of the medical records until 7/8/2024. The Findings are: The Facility Medical Records Policy dated 9/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to provide access of medical records to a qualified person. The facility will supply a copy of a medical record to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey from 7/31/24 to 8/7/24, the facility did not ensure that oxygen equipment was maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice and manufacturer specifications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #308) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the oxygen concentrator filter was not removed and cleaned on a weekly basis, according to the physician's order and the maintenance policy. Findings include: The 1/30/23 facility policy and procedure titled Oxygen Concentrator documented oxygen concentrator cabin filter will be removed and washed weekly. Resident #308 had diagnoses which included Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Generalized Anxiety. The 5/31/24 physician order documented wash oxygen concentrator filter with soap and water every week on Sunday 11 PM-7 AM. The 7/11/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) documented Resident #308 received oxygen therapy. During the observation on 8/5/24 at 9:52 AM of Resident #308's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 7/31/24 to 8/07/24, the facility did not ensure for 1 (Residents #48) of 1 residents reviewed for Pharmacy Services and 1 of 4 residents (Resident #261) reviewed for Drugs/Medications, that they provided medications and/or biologicals, as ordered by the prescriber, to meet the needs of the resident. Specifically, 1. Resident #48 had requested Hydromorphone(Dilaudid) on 7/30/24 and it was not given due to being unavailable from the pharmacy and 2. Resident #261 was not given Jardiance (medication used to lower blood sugar levels in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) on 7/27/24 due to being unavailable from the pharmacy. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Administration-General dated 12/2018 documented that medications were to be administered to resident/s in a timely and accurate manner. 1. Resident #48 was admitted with the following diagnoses including chronic pain, polyneuropathy, stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers of the sacral region, and a stage 3 pressure of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 7/31/24-8/7/24, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1. the walk-in refrigerator contained an open container of Feta Cheese and one 64 oz jug of Cream o Land whole milk which were not dated when opened, 2. the cook's daily/ready to use refrigerator, contained one open/undated 64 oz jug of Cream O Land whole milk, 3. The walk-in freezer, contained unlabeled plastic bags of Tortellini and Croissants which were not dated when opened, and 4. The dry storage room, contained trays of [NAME] Rock diet ginger ale without expiration dates. Finding include: The revised May 12 2021 facility policy and procedures titled Storage of Food Appendix, documented all resident and staff food stored in facility refrigerators were to be properly wrapped, labeled and dated. Proper labeling would consist of received date, use by or expiration date. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/31/24 at 9:13 AM accompanied by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (NY00343508), the facility did not implement the protection component of the abuse prohibition protocol for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, pending the outcome of investigation Certified Nurse Aide #1 continued to provide care to facility residents, potentially promoting continuation of verbal abuse after Resident #34 accused Certified Nurse Aide #1 of calling them inappropriate names. The findings are: Resident #34 had diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, and bipolar disorder. The 10/31/22 Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Identification and Investigation Prevention and Reporting documented the facility will assure all residents and families that the facility has taken steps within its control to prohibit and prevent abuse. The 2/21/23 Comprehensive Care Plan titled Risk for Abuse documented, encourage resident to verbalize any concerns, fears, or issues they may have, monitor resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAGON HEALTHNET — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY