No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Excel At Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing,

8533 Jericho Tpke, Woodbury, NY 11797 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (516) 692-4100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (516) 692-4100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
150 Woodbury Rd · (866) 641-2673 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8285 Jericho Tpke · (516) 367-9030 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8285 JERICHO TURNPIKE
Park
7800 Jericho Tpke · (516) 677-5990 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.0%14.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.0%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.0%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%12.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.4%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.9%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.271.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.091.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 704 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.44hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.52hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 285 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.2%CMS range 56.4–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.7–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.6–8.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.511.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
22.8%
Total nursing turnover
40.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 112.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-22)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/15/2025 and completed on 7/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that it developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for Skin Conditions and one (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed for Edema. Specifically, 1) Resident #82 was admitted to the facility with a condition identified by the Physician as possible Melanoma (the most serious form of skin cancer). The location of the skin lesion was not identified in the medical record, and a comprehensive care plan was not created with nursing interventions for monitoring and care; and 2) Resident #64 had a Physician Order for an Ace wrap (a compression or elastic bandage that provides support and compression to an area of the body) to lower legs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/15/2025 and completed on 7/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in a locked compartment. This was identified for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #7 was observed with a tube of Lidocaine (a topical anesthetic that provides temporary pain relief by numbing the applied area) 5 percent ointment on Resident #7's overbed table. Additionally, there was an open storage box on top of Resident #7's overbed table containing two bottles of unlabeled glucose 4-gram tablets (treat low blood sugar). There was no Nursing staff in the vicinity of Resident #7's room. Resident #7 was not assessed to administer their medications. The finding is:The facility's undated policy titled Storage of Medications documented that compartments containing drugs shall be locked when not in use. These include drawers, cabinets, refrigerators, carts,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00319453) completed on 4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure resident rights to be free from abuse. This was identified for one (Resident #311) of two Residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #311 who had a history of verbally disruptive and intrusive behavior such as attempts to enter other resident rooms, antagonize residents, excessive talking, inappropriate outbursts, and mocking other residents, was transferred to Resident #310's unit on 5/3/2023 after returning from emergency room status post verbal altercation with a resident on the previous unit. Resident #311 continued to have disruptive behaviors including paranoia, agitation, incessant speaking, and being accusatory toward others on the newly assigned unit. On 7/3/2023 Resident #310 punched Resident #311 on the face. Resident #310 stated they hit Resident #311 because they (Resident #311) used foul language toward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/16/2024 and completed on 4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #16) of one resident reviewed for position and mobility. Specifically, Resident #16 had a physician's order for a hip abduction flexion contracture cushion (abduction pillow) to be worn at all times. During observations on 4/17/2024 at 9:00 AM and on 4/19/2024 at 9:00 AM Resident #16 was observed in bed without a hip abduction flexion contracture cushion. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Assistive Devices last revised 11/2022 documented nursing staff is responsible for ensuring the wearing schedule for assistive devices is followed. Conduct skin inspection at a minimum every shift unless otherwise ordered. Nursing or any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/16/2024 and completed on 4/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This was identified for one (Resident #312) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, during the medication pass observation on 4/17/2024 for Resident #312, the labels on the medication blister packs, for physician-prescribed Allopurinol (a medication to reduce uric acid to treat gout and kidney stones) and Torsemide (a diuretic to help reduce fluid in the body), did not match the physician orders. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Pharmacy, dated June 2018, documented the facility utilizes its pharmaceutical services system to ensure the safe and effective use of medications for all our residents; this facility does not have an in-house pharmacy; this facility uses a blister pack system; Medications no longer in use shall be returned for credit or destroyed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00279190, NY 00283964) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 3 of 3 residents units, the kitchen and the basement. Specifically, floors were soiled with litter and sticky substances, and exhausts vents contained a build-up of dust. The finding is: During a tour of the facility on 9/21/2022 to 9/22/2022, the following was observed: (1) the Kitchen Storage room located in the basement contained a sticky substance on the floor. Within the substance were 3 bugs lying on their backs. (2) In the Central Supply closet on the A Wing, plastic bottles, a box of q- tips, and litter was observed on the floor and underneath the metal storage racks (3) In the Staff Lounge, litter was observed behind and along the sides of the refrigerator (4) In the Kitchen, the corners on the floor near the range contained a build-up food, litter, and unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00279190, NY00283964) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests. Specifically, there was evidence of bugs in the kitchen, kitchen storage room, and on the B wing. The finding is: On 9/21/2022 at 8:40 AM, a brown bug with antenna measuring 1 inch in length, was observed on the B unit between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 136. On 9/21/2022 at 10:20 AM, 3 bugs lying on their backs, were observed on the floor in the kitchen storage room. On 9/21/2022 at 10:45 AM, 2 brown bugs measuring 1/8 inch in length were observed walking on the floor below the dishwasher in the kitchen. Resident #59 was observed in the hallway on 9/18/22 at 1:20 PM. Resident #59 stated that the facility has had a lot of bugs like cockroaches and that there were mice in the facility. Resident #59 further stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00295436) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022, the facility did not inform the resident's Designated Representative (DR) when a new form of treatment was started. This was identified for one (Resident #90) of six residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #190's DR was notified 1) when the resident's Zoloft (an antidepressant medication) dosage was increased on 1/7/2022 and 2) when the resident was started on Remeron (an antidepressant medication often used to increase appetite) on 1/4/2022. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Notification of Family of Resident Status Change dated 8/25/2021 documented that it was the policy of the facility to inform the DR of any changes in the resident's condition/status and implemented interventions (If applicable). Residents with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the Recertification survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00282386) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022 the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one (Resident #187) of one Resident reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #187 complained that three facility staff handled the resident roughly during a transfer from one surface to another. The facility investigation did not include all statements necessary to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment including a statement from Resident #187's assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4. The finding is: The facility Accident and Incident Reporting Policy dated 12/1/2019 documented that when an incident occurs to a resident, it will be documented in an Accident Incident Report and an internal investigation will be conducted to determine the root cause of the accident/incident. The facility Resident Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00295436) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident had a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) developed to meet each resident's individualized care needs. This was identified for one (Resident #190) of one resident reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, Resident #190 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and had a Physician's Order to receive finger sticks without coverage four times a day. There was no CCP developed to address the DM diagnosis and blood sugar monitoring. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) and Resident/Patient Meeting dated 11/27/2017 documented that a comprehensive assessment for resident's needs shall be prepared within 14 days from admission and a CCP developed within 21 days from admission. The policy also documented that information obtained from the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00287018) initiated on 9/18/2022 and completed on 9/22/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #189) of one resident reviewed for change of condition. Specifically, Resident #189 had a Pleurx catheter (a drainage system that allows for the drainage of pleural effusion, which is a build-up of fluid in the chest) with orders for the catheter to be drained two times per week. On 11/8/2021 the drainage of the catheter was scheduled; however, the treatment was not administered, although there was qualified staff in the facility that day to provide the treatment. There was no documentation in the medical record regarding the treatment was not administered or that the physician was notified. Furthermore, on two occasions when the Pleurx catheter was drained, there was no documentation of the amount of fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-07-22 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/15/2025 and completed on 7/22/2025, the facility did not ensure all comprehensive resident assessments were completed according to the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, including the Minimum Date Set assessment completion date must be no later than 14 days after the Assesssment Reference date. This was identified for one (Resident #44) of six residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment Task. Specifically, Resident #44's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, with Assessment Reference Date of 10/3/2024, was not completed until 11/13/2024, 27 days after the completion due date.The finding is:The facility's policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set 3.0, last revised 4/25/2025, documented that all Minimum Data Set assessments will adhere to the guidelines set forth by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the New York State Department of Health. Each department is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-07-22 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/15/2025 and completed on 7/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that all completed Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services within 14 days of the resident assessment completion. This was identified for one (Resident #44) of six residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment Task. Specifically, Resident #44's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] and Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] were transmitted more than 14 days after the assessment completion date. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that Resident #44's Significant Change in Status assessment dated [DATE] was transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The finding is:The facility's policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set 3.0, last revised 4/25/2025, documented that all Minimum Data Set assessments will adhere to the guidelines set forth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAGON HEALTHNET — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUFER, ISSACIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/20/2013
LEBOWITZ, CHAIMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 08/20/2013
LEBOWITZ, MAXIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 08/20/2013
WOODBURY REAL ESTATE HOLDING CO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2012
ALTMAN, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
FLANAGAN, BRENAINNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
POLIMENI, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
LEBOWITZ, ANIKOIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025
LEBOWITZ, DINAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 33%Medicare 50%Other / private 17%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$712per resident / day
operating cost
$21,652per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$621per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335231. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next