Sutton Park Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 153.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey and abbreviated surveys (686919, 2690393) from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not maintain a homelike environment for two of four (third and sixth floor) nursing units, and a tub room on the 4th floor. Specifically, 1) resident rooms # 302 a-b, 307 a-d, 315 a-d, 316 a-d were not personalized, lacked adequate visitor seating, 2) fifteen resident rooms (602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 614, 616, 617, 619, and 620) were observed stark and bare without personalization; and 15 resident rooms (603, 604b, 605a, 606a-b, 609a, 610, 606 a-b, 607a-d, 609a, 610, 616a-d, 617a, 618b, 619a-b, and 620) did not contain a chair for resident/visitor use; and 3) the tub room on the 4th floor, had window insulation that was coming out and a cold draft was coming from the window. The findings included: A facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 08/2021 documented: Resident has the right to have a homelike environment, keep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (2569922) surveys from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of seven (7) residents (Resident # 51) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living and one (1) of one (1) residents (Resident #158) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Specifically, 1) Resident #158 did not have their daily wound dressing changed for 7 days and did not receive treatment according to the physician order. 2) Resident # 51 dislocated their hip and did not have an orthopedic follow-up as recommended in the hospital discharge summary. The findings are: 1) Resident # 158 had diagnoses of lumbosacral and pelvis fractures, Type II Diabetes Mellitus and skin graft right arm. The admission nursing note dated 1/10/2026 documented the resident was alert and oriented and had traumatic wounds from being dragged by a car. Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (2569922) surveys from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not ensure that all alleged injuries of unknown origin, were reported to the State Agency for one (1) of seven (7) residents. (Resident #51) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #51 had an x-ray that confirmed the dislocation of the right femoral head (top of long bone in the thigh) prosthesis (hip replacement). The 01/18/2025 Accident/Incident Report documented the date, location, and time of occurrence as unknown, and there was no documented evidence that the injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency. The findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Identification and Investigation; Prevention; and Reporting, revised 12/05/2025, documents that an injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when the criteria are as follows: the injury was not observed by any person, the injury could not be explained by the resident, or the injury is suspicious because of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (2569922) surveys from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not ensure a thorough and complete investigation was done to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment for one (1) of seven (7) residents (Resident # 51), reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident # 51 had their right hip replacement dislocated, and the facility did not thoroughly investigate to determine if the care plan was followed when determining a root cause analysis for the dislocated hip. The findings include: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Identification and Investigation; Prevention; and Reporting, revised 12/05/2025, documented that it was the policy of the facility to ensure all residents and families that the facility had taken the necessary steps within its control to prevent and prohibit abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when the criteria were as follows: the injury was not observed by any person, the injury could not be explained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not ensure residents received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing and/or promote healing of pressure ulcers for two (2) of eight (8) Residents (Resident #125 and #94) reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1) Specifically, Resident #125 who had Stage 4 pressure ulcers to their right hip and sacrum and was at high risk for further development of pressure ulcers, was observed on multiple occasions without physician-ordered bilateral heel boots in place and/or their heels were not offloaded while in bed. Additionally, during a wound treatment observation for the two Stage 4 pressure ulcers, the resident was left with a saturated brief and bed liner contaminating the wound after it had been cleansed. 2) Resident #94 did not have their heels offloaded/floating while in bed and the comprehensive care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 01/20/2026 to 01/28/2026, the facility did not ensure that needed services, care, and equipment were provided to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion and mobility maintained or improved function based on the resident's clinical condition for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #125) reviewed for position and mobility. Specifically, Resident #125 had a contracted left hand and was observed on multiple occasions without a physician ordered left-hand hand roll device in place.The findings included: Resident #125 diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, and Stage 4 pressure ulcers of sacral region and right hip.The annual Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/29/2025 documented Resident #125 had severe cognitive impairment, no rejection of cares and was dependent on staff for all cares and mobility. A resident care plan titled Activities of Daily Living updated 01/31/2025, documented interventions including a left-hand roll to be worn when out of bed as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey 01/20/2026-01/28/2026 it was determined for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) the facility did not ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, Specifically, Resident #8, who had a tracheostomy, (an surgical opening into the trachea to provide an airway for easier breathing) did not have an Ambu bag (and a self-inflating bag resuscitator) and an extra tracheostomy replacement provided in the resident room to be used in the event of accidental extubation.The findings are: Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/20/2026-01/28/2026 the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #8 had a tracheostomy, (a surgical opening into the trachea to provide an airway for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey from 11/7/23-11/14/23, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with dignity for 2 of 4 residents (#71 and #119 ) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, 1) staff were not seated when feeding Resident #71; and 2) staff were observed entering Resident #119's room without knocking on the door. The findings are: The facility policy for Feeding Assistance Program dated 3/2023 documented, staff will be seated when feeding a resident. 1) Resident# 71 was admitted with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease and abnormal weight loss. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #71 required assistance with eating. During an observation on 11/08/23 at 12:41 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 was observed standing while assisting Resident # 71 with their meal. During an interview with LPN #5 on 11/08/23 at 12:55 PM, they stated they knew they should have been seated while feeding the resident,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/7/2023 through 11/14/2023 the facility did not ensure that resident and/or resident representative were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language that they understood, and the facility did not notify the Ombudsman for 1 of 5 residents (Residents # 109) reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, the resident was transferred to the hospital and the facility could not provide evidence that a written notice of transfer/discharge was provided to the resident, or the resident representatives and that notification was sent to the State Ombudsman. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Admission, transfer discharge revised 1/2022 documented the resident or representative will be informed of the resident transfer discharge. The state Ombudsman will be notified of all facilities-initiated discharge. Resident # 109 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00325370) conducted from 11/6/2023 to 11/14/2023, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #120) reviewed for accidents, 1 of 3 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for hospitalization and 1 of 4 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, 1) the facility did not ensure a person-centered care plan was developed for Resident #120 to be able to self-administer medications. 2) Staff did not implement interventions as per care plan for Resident #10 with a history of falls. 3) Staff did not develop a care plan to address Resident #46's refusal to wear clothes. The findings are: Review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medication Administration-General dated 04/2018, documented medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PARAGON HEALTHNET — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY