Vancrest Of Ada

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, review of the facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of staff and resident statements, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents did not develop avoidable, facility acquired, pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #50 on 10/24/25 when facility staff placed the resident on a bedpan and failed to check on her and remove her from the bedpan for an extended period of time. Consequently, Resident #50 developed a deep tissue injury (DTI - a type of pressure injury that begins in the deeper tissues and is caused by prolonged pressure) on her buttocks. Additionally, upon discovery of the DTI, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and document the DTI. This affected one (#50) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the provider and resident representative of a new skin impairment. This affected one (#50) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 48. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 01/08/25 and a discharge date of 10/31/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart beat), diabetes mellitus type II, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage three (CKD is measured in stages one through four, stage four requires renal dialysis), liver cirrhosis, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), bilateral (both sides) below the knee amputation (BKA), and altered mental status.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact and had no unhealed pressure ulcers.Review of the Weekly Wound and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Observation on 02/03/25 beginning at 8:40 A.M. revealed the kitchen floor surrounding the deep fryer had a thick amount of grease as well as both left and right sides of the deep fryer; the handles of the oven had a large amount of dried food substances; the shelf above the range was covered in aluminum foil but black with foods and grease; the two shelves above the steam table had a moderate film of grease build-up; the top of the convection oven had a thick film of black grease; and the ice scoop was stored inside the machine on top of the ice. Interview on 02/03/25 at 9:00 A.M. with [NAME] #110 verified the above findings. Review of the policy titled, Sanitization, dated 11/22, revealed all kitchens and kitchen areas are kept clean and free from debris.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of Medicare beneficiary notice letters, and staff interview, the facility failed to issue Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN) to residents. This affected two residents (#24 and #104) of three residents reviewed for Medicare beneficiary notice letters. The census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/24. Diagnoses listed included hemiplegia, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) dated 10/07/24 revealed Medicare part A services would end on 10/11/24. Further review of Resident #24's medical record revealed he remains in the facility. There was no documentation of a SNFABN being issued to Resident #24 on 10/11/24. 2. Review of Resident #104's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 11/22/24. Diagnoses listed included atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. Review of a NOMNC dated 12/16/24 revealed Medicare part A services would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs for one resident (#259) of one resident reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of medical record of Resident #259 revealed an admission date of 01/25/25. Diagnoses included chronic systolic heart failure. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #259 was cognitively intact. Review of care plan initiated on 01/13/25 revealed the treatment of Tubigrips (compression stockings) and ace wraps was not added to the care plan Review of physician order dated 01/31/25 revealed to apply Tubigrips size G then wrap over the top with ace wraps every A.M. off P.M. Observation on 02/03/25 at 11:02 A.M. and second observation on 02/04/25 at 1:02 P.M. revealed Resident #259 sitting in recliner in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to include all aspects of patient care. This affected one (Resident #1) of 16 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 08/11/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, rheumatoid arthritis, age-related osteoporosis, muscle weakness, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impairment on both sides for upper body movement and lower body movement. Review of current physician orders revealed no orders for splinting or bracing right hand contracture. Review of discharged physician orders revealed Resident #1 to wear right palm protector throughout the day eight to twelve hours, hand hygiene to be completed pre/post application,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment for contracture's. This affected one (Resident #1) of one reviewed for contracture's. The facility also failed to provide treatments per physician order. This affected one (Resident #259) of one reviewed for treatments. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 08/11/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, rheumatoid arthritis, age-related osteoporosis, muscle weakness, and cerebral infarction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impairment on both sides for upper body movement and lower body movement. Review of current physician orders revealed no orders for splinting or bracing right hand contracture. Review of discharged physician orders revealed Resident #1 to wear right palm protector…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an ordered safety intervention was in place for a resident. This affected Resident #21 of four reviewed for accidents. The census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/13/23. Diagnoses listed include hypertension, psychotic disturbance, and severe dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan dated 09/13/23 revealed Resident #21 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self care performance related to her severe dementia. Resident #21 required supervision and cueing for eating. The care plan was updated after 01/17/25 to add an intervention for a Kennedy cup (spill proof cup) was to be used for hot liquids. Review of progress notes revealed on 01/17/25 at 8:30 A.M. Resident #21 reached for her hot chocolate and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed per physician order. This affected three (Residents #7, #22, and #23) of five residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/01/17 with diagnoses including but not limited to asthma. Review of current physician orders revealed oxygen tubing/equipment to be changed/cleansed weekly. Observation on 02/03/25 at 10:40 A.M. revealed oxygen tubing dated 01/04/25. Interview on 02/03/25 at 10:41 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #209) verified the oxygen tubing was dated 01/04/25. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 07/27/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to personal history of pulmonary embolism, dementia, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of current physician orders revealed change oxygen tubing on Thursdays. Observation on 02/03/25 at 9:58 A.M. of oxygen concentrator in the bathroom revealed oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of information from Medscape, the facility failed to follow pharmacy recommendation for one resident (#25) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications resulting in an unobserved medication error. The facility census was 51. Findings include. Review of the medical record of Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 07/09/24. Diagnoses included anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, migraines, and angina pectoris. Review of the physician orders dated 07/08/24 revealed orders for Topamax (migraines) 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily, Protonix 40 mg daily, Isosorbide mononitrate extended release 40 mg daily, and ferrous sulfate 325 mg daily. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 08/02/24 revealed a recommendation to consider holding or discontinuing the medications if crushing becomes necessary long-term. The document was indicated as agree and signed by the physician. Interview on 02/05/25 at 11:20 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #167 revealed she crushes all of Resident #25's medications as Resident #25 will spit out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, policy review and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications regarding having an adequate indication of use for a long-term antibiotic. This affected one (#40) out of five resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 10/11/23 with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral symptoms, major depressive disorder, malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, and anxiety. Resident #40 does not have a diagnosis of chronic urinary tract infections (UTI). Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 had a urinalyses with culture on 05/06/24 with Cipro (antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg) two times a day for seven days ordered on 05/12/24 for UTI. A urinalysis with culture on 06/05/24 with Microbid 10 mg two times a day for seven days ordered on 06/10/24 for UTI. A urinalysis with culture on 06/24/24 with Amoxicillin 500 mg two times a day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANCREST HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $809K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH