No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vancrest Of Urbana, INC

2380 St Rt 68 S, Urbana, OH 43078 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (937) 653-5291 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 653-5291 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
900 Scioto St., Suite 4
Pharmacy
719 Scioto St · (937) 653-7139 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1255 N Main St · (937) 508-4233 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1451 Kennard-Kingscreek Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2815 E Clark Rd · (937) 772-9009

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.0%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.8%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.2%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.2%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.1%12.9%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
85.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 85.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.8%CMS range 49.3–69.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.1–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge85.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.7–16.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 67.0 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-12)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred residents via mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #19 on 06/06/25 when staff transferred the resident into a recliner via Hoyer lift. The Hoyer lift was not wide enough to accommodate Resident #19's recliner and the bar of the lift swung back and struck the resident in the forehead causing bruising and a laceration to her forehead which required an emergency room visit and repair with sutures. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility also failed to prevent resident falls and failed to thoroughly investigate resident falls. This affected one (Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 07/29/23 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, contracture of lower leg muscle, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to date dry product when delivered to the facility, failed to discard expired foods, and failed to ensure staff changed gloves after touching surfaces before touching food while preparing food served to the residents. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/09/24 at 8:20 A.M. of the dry food storage area revealed two bags of spiral noodles with expiration date of 06/17/23, seven bags of vanilla wafers with one bag open with no date, four bags of yellow cake mix, eight bags of powdered sugar, four bags of brown sugar, and three cans of three bean salad not dated with the date delivered to facility. Interview on 04/09/24 at 8:26 A.M. with Dietary Aide #27 verified the two bags of spiral noodles were expired. Dietary Aide #27 verified the vanilla wafers, yellow cake mix, powdered sugar, brown sugar, and cans of three been salad were not dated. Dietary Aide #27 stated the vanilla wafers were in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, completion of a test tray, review of resident council notes, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve palatable meals to the residents. This affected five (Resident #19, #21, #22, #25, and #66) of 17 residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. Interview on 04/09/24 at 10:02 A.M. with Resident #19 revealed the food was often cold when she receives it. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 11/03/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the Notice of Medicate Non-coverage in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #282) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #282 revealed an admission date of 09/27/23 and discharge date of 10/18/23. Diagnoses included chronic hepatitis and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #282 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Notice of Medicate Non-coverage (NOMNC) revealed Resident #282's last covered day of Part A services was 10/17/23. The NOMNC was signed by the resident on the same day on 10/17/23. Interview on 04/11/24 at 3:44 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM #120) verified Resident #282 did not receive the NOMNC until 10/17/23, which was the last covered day. BOM #120 stated she thought the resident was going to stay here on hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were person-centered to include all areas of concern. This affected three (Resident #14, #50, and #72) of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed Resident #14 had an admission date of 09/12/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and age-related physical debility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had severely cognitively impaired. Resident #14 was dependent on staff for toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the plan of care dated 03/18/24 revealed that Resident #14 had no active care plan of incontinence care, wore incontinence briefs, and was dependent on staff for care. Resident #14 was at risk for nutrition and dehydration related to urinary tract infections. Interventions included monitor for signs and symptoms of dehydration,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility policy, review of the guidance from Medscape, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the proper diagnosis for administration of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of delirium due to known physiological condition, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's physician orders for 04/2024 revealed an order for Zyprexa (antipsychotic) for delirium. Review of Resident #3's diagnoses revealed no schizophrenia or bipolar disorder diagnoses. The only diagnosis listed was delirium due to known psychological condition, but no psychological diagnoses was listed. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered the pneumonia vaccine. This affected three (#19, #20, and #50) of five residents reviewed for pneomococcal immunization. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date 04/01/22. The medical record revealed Resident #19 had the influenza vaccination on 10/03/23, and there was no evidence the resident was offered the pneumococcal immunization. Interview on 04/11/24 at 3:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #19 did not get offered the pneumonia vaccination. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 11/27/23. There was no evidence Resident #20 was offered the pneumococcal immunization or received it in the past prior to admission. Interview on 04/11/24 at 9:50 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #20 did not get offered the pneumonia vaccination. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to timely obtain a newly admitted resident's medications. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for medications. The census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/23 (Sunday). Diagnoses listed included cervical disk disorder with myelopathy, spinal stenosis, osteoarthritis, depression, hypothyroidism, and anxiety. Resident #4 left the facility against medical advice (AMA) on 08/01/23. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 07/30/23 for levothyroxine sodium tablet 88 micrograms (mcg) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for hypothyroidism. An order dated 07/31/23 was for methylprednisolone oral therapy pack four milligrams (mg) given one tablet a day for pain and inflammation for seven days. Review of medication administration records (MARs) revealed levothyroxine 88 mcg was not administered on 07/30/23 or 07/31/23 due to not being available. Methylprednisolone oral therapy pack four mg was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record view, hospital documentation review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after a visit to the emergency room. This affect one (#15) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/08/23. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic systolic (congestive heart failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, and depression. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was sent to the emergency department (ED) on 07/31/23, did not return to the facility, and the facility stopped billing Medicaid for Resident #15 on 07/31/23. Review of Resident #15's facility nursing progress notes on 07/31/23 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #149 returned to the facility at 6:50 P.M. after an incident involving Resident #15.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of emails sent to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when residents were discharged from the facility. This affected two (#15 and #24) of four reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/08/23. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic systolic (congestive heart failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, and depression. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no documentation the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified. 2. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/23/23. Diagnosis included displaced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to provide a discharge summary when residents were discharged from the facility. This affected one (#22) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/23. Diagnoses included transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, and bone density and structure disorder. Resident #22 was discharged on 08/12/23. Review of Resident #22 medical record revealed there was no discharge summary completed when Resident #22 was discharged on 08/12/23. Interview on 08/16/23 at 2:00 P.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #120 stated Resident #22 was discharged to an assisted living facility, therefore, Resident #22 did not require a discharge recapitulation of her stay. SSD #120 stated the facility sent documentation by facsimile (fax) to the assisted living facility. Interview on 08/16/23 at 2:05 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #149 confirmed Resident #22 did not receive written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have physician visits or progress notes available in resident medical records. This effected three (#15, #18, and #22) of four resident's medical records reviewed for reviewed for discharge. The census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/08/23. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic systolic (congestive heart failure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease, and depression. Further review of the medical record did not have physician progress notes or visit noted available for review. 2. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/20/23. Diagnoses included chronic gout, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. Further review of the medical record did not have physician progress notes or visit notes available for review. 3. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/23. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy reviews, the facility failed to store food and maintain food in a safe fashion and and failed to serve food in a hygienic manner. This had the potential to affect 67 of 67 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation of the reach in refrigerator with Dietary Manager (DM) #113 in the central kitchen on 02/27/23 at 9:40 A.M., revealed turkey lunch meat was in a zipper plastic bag dated 02/20/23 and ham lunch meat was in a zipper plastic bad was dated 02/20/23. At the time of the observation, DM #113 stated the two lunch meats should only be stored in the refrigerator for three days and DM #113 removed the lunch meat zipper bags from the refrigerator so they could not be used. There were two bowls in the reach in refrigerator that had a red liquid in them and the bowls were not dated or labeled. DM #113 verified the bowls should be dated and labeled and removed the bowls. DM #113 stated they were tomato soup. Observation of the lunch meal tray line on 03/01/23 from 12:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic drugs were provided routine behavior monitoring. This affected four (#2, #3, #8 and # 58) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including weakness, hypothyroidism, left knee replacement, depression, anxiety, dementia and cerebral infarction. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is cognitively impaired, wanders daily but had no other behaviors. Resident #2 required limited assist with personal hygiene, supervision for toileting, and dressing and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and eating. Resident #2 received seven days of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication and six days of antianxiety medication. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to invite and involve a resident and/or their representative in their care planning and conduct care plan meetings. This affected one (#26) of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed admission date of 04/01/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke and hemiplegia of the left dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive two person assistance for bed mobility, one total dependence for transfers, toileting, and supervision for eating. Resident #26's MDS documentation revealed a quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 10/14/22. Review of the progress notes for Resident #26 revealed no documentation of care conferences being held. Upon request the facility provided paperwork for a care conference dated 10/26/23. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify a physician of a fall with a head injury. This affected one (#63) of two reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #63 revealed admission date of 02/02/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia, bacteremia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, depression, and anxiety. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and supervision for eating. Record review revealed Resident #63 had an unwitnessed fall in the bathroom on 02/28/23. The fall resulted in contusion to the left forehead. Neurological assessments were initiated and were negative. Notification of the fall was written in the provider communication book. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform a resident/ representative of cost for care and services that they would be responsible for when a payor source would change. This affected two (#7 and #36) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification the cost of the skilled service after by Medicare Part A. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with Medicare Part A as her payor source. The resident record revealed the resident payor source changed on 02/16/23 to Medicaid and the resident remained in the facility. Resident #7's diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease, Parkinson's disease, hyperlipidemia, and depression. Review of Resident #7's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required extensive assist for bed mobility, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a environment in good repair. This affected one (#30) of 67 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed admission date of 04/29/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision for eating and extensive assistance for all other activities of daily living. Interview and observation on 02/27/23 at 1:02 P.M., with Resident #30 revealed she was bothered by the chipped paint and dry wall damage beside her bed, which was caused by her recliner hitting the wall. Resident #30 shared the facility moved her bed against the damaged wall after a fall and she would like the wall fixed. Observation of the wall, at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete a discharge assessment in a timely manner. This affected one (#64) of 24 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #64 revealed admission date of 08/31/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke, diabetes mellitus type two, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. The resident was discharged on 10/20/22. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance or was totally dependent for her activities of daily living. Review of the MDS assessments in the medical record revealed a discharge assessment was not completed as of 02/28/23. Interview on 03/01/23 at 8:09 A.M., with MDS Nurse #124 verified a discharge MDS was not completed as required for Resident #64.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident and reflect the accurate assessment on the the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment. This affected two (#48 and #57) of 24 resident assessments reviewed for accuracy. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, and palliative care. Review of Resident #48's physician orders revealed the resident started hospice care on 09/27/22 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #48 additionally had a physician order for bilateral palm protectors for four hours daily as tolerated dated 06/27/22. Review Resident #48's care plans revealed the resident had a care plan for activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan timely. This affected one (#172) of 24 residents reviewed fro care planning. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #172 revealed an admission date of 02/06/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stoke, hemiplegia of left non dominant side and dysarthria (slurred or slow speech that can be difficult to understand). The resident remains in the facility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating and toileting. Review of a care plan, initiated on 02/13/23, revealed a communication focus related to dysarthria due to a stroke; activities of daily living self-care performance due to hemiplegia and nutritional/dehydration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered consult with specialized physician appointment was made timely. This affected one (#63) of 24 residents records reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #63 revealed admission date of 02/02/28. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia, bacteremia, hypertension, depression and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and supervision for eating. Review of the physician orders for Resident #63 revealed a 02/23/23 order for a gastrointestinal (GI) consult. Observation on 03/01/23 at 9:47 A.M., revealed Medical Records #134 was on the phone making an appointment for Resident #63. Interview with Medical Records #134,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a follow up appointment with an ophthalmologist was scheduled and a physician ordered medication was started for maintaining This affected one (#10) of four residents reviewed for vision and hearing services. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses included osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively impaired and had adequate vision without corrective lenses. Review of Resident #10's care plan indicated he had impaired visual function related to a bind spot of the unspecified eye. Interventions include to arrange consultation with eye care practitioner as required, monitor for any changes in ability to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure new fall interventions were timely implemented after a resident sustained a major injury requiring a hospital visit. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #22 revealed an admission date on 12/22/21. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #22 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of non-traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 01/05/23 revealed Resident #22 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #22 utilized a wheelchair to ambulate at the facility. Review of the progress note dated 02/05/23 revealed an activity staff member observed Resident #22 on the floor, face first. Resident #22 was bleeding from above the right eyebrow and under right eye.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain weights in a timely manner. This affected two (#172 and #63) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #172 revealed an admission date of 02/06/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia of left non dominant side and dysarthria (slurred or slow speech that can be difficult to understand). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has intact cognition and required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating and toileting. Review of the care plan initiated on 02/16/23, revealed a nutritional/dehydration risk related to a stroke, dysphagia and vitamin deficiency. Interventions included to obtain a weight at a minimum of monthly and report any significant change to the physician, provide and serve nutritional supplements as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to act on pharmacy recommendations timely and the facility failed to provide a rationale for refusing a pharmacy recommendation. This affected three (#2, #8 and #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including weakness, hypothyroidism, left knee replacement, depression, anxiety, dementia and cerebral infarction. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is cognitively impaired, wanders daily but had no other behaviors. Resident #2 required limited assist with personal hygiene, supervision for toileting, and dressing and was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and eating. Resident #2 received seven days of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication and six days of antianxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to give a physician ordered medication for a weight gain for congestive heart failure as ordered. This affected one (#44) of five resident records reviewed for medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #44 revealed admission date of 02/06/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including kidney disease stage three (of four), atrial fibrillation, acute on chronic congestive heart failure. The resident remains in the facility. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident has impaired cognition and required one person assistance for toileting, limited assistance for personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and supervision for eating. Review of the care plan initiated 02/06/23 revealed an altered cardiovascular status related to acute on chronic congestive heart failure. Interventions included but were not limited to assess for shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and facility staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory test were completed timely. This affected two (#2 and #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including weakness, hypothyroidism, left knee replacement, depression, anxiety, dementia and cerebral infarction. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is cognitively impaired, wandered daily but had no other behaviors. Resident #2 received six days of anticoagulant and antianxiety medication and seven days of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of Resident #10's admission orders dated 10/27/22 (Thursday) revealed the following orders: Coumadin (anticoagulant) 8 milligram (mg) Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; Coumadin 7.5 mg on Tuesday, Thursday ,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered radiology test were completed timely. This affected one (#22) of 24 resident reviewed for radiology. The facility census was 67. Findings included: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date on od 12/22/21 and re-admission date of 02/11/23. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage on 02/05/23, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 01/05/23 revealed Resident #22 was severely cognitively impaired and required for assistance extensive one-person physical assist for dressing, bed mobility, transfers, eating, bathing, and toilet use. Resident #22 used a wheelchair to ambulate at the facility. Review of hospital discharge document dated on 02/05/23 revealed to complete a CAT (Computed Axial Tomography) scan of the head without contrast by or approximate on 02/20/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and facility staff interview, the facility failed to timely obtain dental services. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The total facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses including osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes, atrial fibrillation, dementia, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment, and did not have mouth pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Resident #10's medical record was silent to the resident being provided dental services at the facility. Review of Resident #10's admission contract signed by the resident revealed the resident had signed to receive dental practitioner services at the facility. Review of the last year of dental visits revealed the dentist had been at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a diet order to meet the needs of the resident. This affected one (#22) of three residents reviewed for dietary needs. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date on of 12/22/21 and re-admission date of 02/11/23, with diagnosis including chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage on 02/05/23, and dysphagia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 01/05/23 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident required for assistance extensive one-person physical assist for dressing, bed mobility, transfers, eating, bathing, and toilet use. Review of the plan of care dated on 02/12/23 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for nutritional status due to fracture to right humerus. Resident was total dependence during meals at all times. Interventions included monitor for signs and symptoms of chewing or swallowing difficulties, honor food preferences,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 70. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 01/21/20 at 9:05 A.M. revealed a grayish fuzzy like substance on the light fixture above the food preparation table. Interview with Dietary Aide #143 on 01/21/20 at 9:05 A.M. verified there was a grayish fuzzy like substance on the light fixture above the food preparation table. 2. Observation of the kitchen on 01/22/20 at 11:13 A.M. revealed a grayish fuzzy like substance on the light fixture above the food preparation table. Interview with Dietary Manager #152 on 01/22/20 at 11:13 A.M. verified there was a grayish fuzzy like substance on the light fixture above the food preparation table. 3. Observation of the kitchen on 01/22/20 at 12:10 P.M. revealed a grayish fuzzy like substance on the piping along the ceiling above the tray line area. Interview with Dietary Manager #152 on 01/22/20 at 12:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected four (#68, #73, #21, and #22) of 16 residents reviewed for accuracy of the assessment. The census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, insomnia, chronic pain, osteoporosis, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, chronic respiratory failure, and hyponatremia. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #68 had no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). Review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #68's plan of care dated 06/19, revealed the resident was at risk for oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview; the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the reason transfer/discharge to the hospital. Additionally, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice to the Ombudsman. This affected two (#63 and #21) of five resident's reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type two, major depressive disorder, cellulitis, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, cellulitis of left lower limb, hypertension, and osteoporosis. Review of a progress note dated 11/20/19 at 12:16 P.M. revealed Resident #63 had an unwitnessed fall at the facility on 11/20/19. Documentation revealed the physician was at the facility and gave orders to send the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. The resident was admitted to the hospital. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the bed hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#63) of five resident's reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus type two, major depressive disorder, cellulitis, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, cellulitis of left lower limb, hypertension, and osteoporosis. Review of a progress note dated 11/20/19 at 12:16 P.M. revealed Resident #63 had an unwitnessed fall at the facility on 11/20/19. Documentation revealed the physician was at the facility and gave orders to sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. The resident was admitted to the hospital. Review of a progress note dated 11/26/19 at 9:43 P.M. revealed Resident #63 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/27/09 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed a care plan focus of Resident #21 had potential for injuries/falls related to cognitive deficits, does not wait for assistance, wandering, incontinence, and per x-ray has osteopenia which increases risk of injury with falls. The care plan had a goals of safety will be maintained through next review, and will have minimal risk of injury from falls through next review. The care plan had fall interventions which included call light within reach while in the room, encourage non-skid footwear at all times, encourage to rest throughout the day, ensure blanket corner is tucked on left side of the bed, frequent orientation to room, bathroom, call light and facility, keep needed items within reach, left side of bed against the wall, maintain uncluttered environment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANCREST HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAGLEY, JONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER22%since 09/17/2007
GEHL, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/17/2007
MCCLEERY, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER9%since 09/17/2007
MYERS, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 09/17/2007
WHITE, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER27%since 08/01/2008
WHITE, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 09/17/2007
VANCREST MANAGEMENT CORP.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/04/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$860K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 9%Other / private 37%

This home reported $860K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$291per resident / day
operating cost
$8,860per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$257per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365437. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next