Vancrest-Upper Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 159 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 114.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided ongoing monitoring of a resident's left heel pressure ulcer and failed to notify the physician when the wound deteriorated/began draining. This resulted in Actual Harm to one resident (#75) when facility staff did not provide ongoing monitoring of Resident #75's left heel pressure ulcer including measuring/staging the wound, did not notify the physician when the wound began to drain and Resident #75's left heel ulcer subsequently deteriorated into an unstageable pressure ulcer (the area could not be staged due to presence of slough and/or eschar). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure preventative measures were in place and treatments were completed as ordered by the physician for a second resident's (#112) pressure ulcer, which placed the resident at risk for potential harm. This affected two (#75 and #112) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify resident representative of new order for antibiotic and reason for the use of the medication. This affected one (#1) resident out of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 03/08/13. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure, anoxic brain damage, persistent vegetative state, and tracheostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/30/24, revealed Resident #1 was in a persistent vegetative state. Review of the physician order dated 07/18/24 revealed an order for amoxicillin-pot Clavulanate (Augmentin) 875-125 (antibiotic) milligram (mg) one tablet via gastrostomy (g-tube) every 12 hours for bacterial infection. Review of the physician note, dated 07/18/24, revealed Resident #1 was seen due to redness and swelling of the right jaw. Resident #1's examination was positive for swollen glands and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a resident's grievance related to missing property. This affected one (#83) of three residents reviewed for missing property. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 10/26/22. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and congestive heart failure. Resident #83 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 was cognitively intact. Interview on 07/22/24 at 9:26 A.M. with Resident #83 stated she was hospitalized in early June 2024 and while she was at the hospital, her roommate at the facility had discharged . Resident #83 stated her roommate's family packed all the roommate's belongings and took the items home.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, policy review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual 3.0, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely after a resident experienced a significant change of condition. This affected one (#83) of seven residents reviewed for significant change in condition. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 10/26/22. Diagnoses included nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur and right clavicle, diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and congestive heart failure. Resident #83 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Medicare five-day MDS assessment, dated 04/14/24, revealed Resident #83 was cognitively intact and required supervision or touching assistance with toilet hygiene, transfers, and toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a care plan in place for his behavior with wandering and residing on a secure unit. This affected one (Resident #20) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #20 revealed an admission dated of 05/13/24. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was at a risk for wandering. Review of the form Wandering Risk Assessment dated 06/18/24 revealed Resident #20 was at a high risk for wandering. Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed there was no focus area of wandering or residing on a secure unit. Interview on 07/24/24 at 3:27 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #327 verified Resident #20's care plan contained no focus or interventions for wandering or residing in a secure unit.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow proper mechanical lift protocols during a resident's transfer from the bed to a wheelchair. This affected one resident (#47) of three residents reviewed for transfers with lifts. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #47 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #47 included cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type two, obesity, and heart disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of Resident #47's care plans dated 05/01/17 revealed a focus for falls and injuries relating to mobility. Resident #47 utilized a lift for transfers. Interventions included using a Hoyer lift for all transfers with two staff members. Continuous observation on 07/23/24 from 9:16 A.M. to 9:30 A.M. revealed State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter had a valid medical justification for the use. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for indwelling catheter. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 05/27/24. Diagnoses included right above the knee amputation (AKA), atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and anemia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #50 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toileting, and had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #50's physician order dated 05/28/24 revealed an order for an indwelling urinary catheter 16 French with 10 milliliter (ml) balloon to continuous drainage. There was diagnosis for the use of the catheter on the physician order. Review of the bladder and bowel assessment, dated 06/22/24, revealed Resident #50 had a history of bladder continence, used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility policy, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to assess the need for bed rails on a resident's bed. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and started to receive hospice services on 10/05/23. Diagnoses for Resident #21 included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, weakness, kidney failure, and heart disease. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had impaired cognition, was not using bed rails, and was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #21's documentation revealed as of 09/2014 the resident's daughter was medical Power of Attorney (POA). The census record revealed Resident #21's daughter was designated as the POA and emergency contact family representative. Review of a consent form dated 10/05/23 revealed half partial rails…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were responded to in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #23) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Record review for Resident #23 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #23 include Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, vascular dementia, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, no behaviors, and was receiving an antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #23's care plans dated 10/23/13 revealed a focus for complications of vitamin deficiency. Interventions include administer medications per order, monitor lab results and report abnormalities to physician, and schedule/arrange for resident to attend diagnostic testing as ordered. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, outside provider interview, and physician interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medication use. This affected one (Resident #38) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 01/20/21. Diagnoses include acquired absence of kidney and renal cancer. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 had been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) on 10/02/23, 02/25/24, and 03/19/24. Review of the physician orders dated 04/03/24 revealed an order for Macrodantin macrocrystal 50 milligrams one time daily for prophylactic/indefinitely. Review of a outside practitioners report dated 05/16/24 revealed Resident #38 was seen for a follow-up regarding a UTI. The report indicated Resident #38 was currently experiencing nocturnal one time per night, but was not experiencing hematuria, dysuria, urinary frequency, fever, chills, nausea, vomiting or urgency. The form indicated doing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of Medscape guidance, review of the insulin pen quick reference guide, and policy review, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen per manufacturer instructions prior to administration, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#83) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 10/26/22. Diagnosis included diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/13/24, revealed Resident #83 was cognitively intact and received insulin. Review of the physician order dated 07/08/24 for Humalog Kwikpen 100 unit per milliliter (ml) solution pen injector, inject 10 units of insulin subcutaneous (SQ) before meals related to DM. Observation on 07/23/24 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #248 prepared Humalog kwikpen for Resident #83. LPN #248 attached the needle to injector pen and set the dose on the pen to 10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VANCREST HEALTH CARE CENTERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH