Country Club Retirement Ctr IV
55801 Conno-Mara Drive, Bellaire, OH 43906 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (740) 676-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.5% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.73 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.00 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.5%CMS range 50.7–73.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.2–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.0–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a closed medical record, hospital records, death certificate, facility investigation and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and individualized fall/safety interventions and provide adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #46), who was assessed as cognitively impaired, at risk for falls and required extensive staff assistance for transfers and ambulation. Resident #46 sustained 18 falls while residing in the facility between [DATE] and [DATE]. This resulted in Actual Harm that was Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] when Resident #46 sustained an unwitnessed fall in his room sustaining an intracranial bleed, multiple facial fractures, lacerations to his right forehead/scalp which required six sutures to control vascular bleeding, two cervical spine fractures and a right frontal skull fracture with a scalp hematoma. Resident #46 expired (in the hospital) on [DATE] as a result of the injuries sustained during the fall. The cause of death on the death…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospice notes, review of photos, review of pharmacy records, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40 received adequate and necessary care and services for end-of-life care. This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for quality care and services.Actual harm was identified on 11/26/25 involving Resident #40, who was admitted to the facility for end of life care and hospice services. The facility failed to ensure the resident received comprehensive assessments and adequate monitoring of his condition, including evaluation and management of ongoing pain and anxiety associated with his terminal illnesses. The facility did not implement or administer the ordered treatments and medications necessary to promote comfort and symptom relief. As a result, the resident experienced continued anxiety and unrelieved pain, necessitating transfer to an inpatient hospice facility on 11/27/25. The resident expired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective pain management program for Resident #41, who had a diagnosis of migraines. Actual harm occurred on 11/29/25 (three days after admission) when Resident #41, who was diagnosed with severe intractable migraines prior to admission to the facility, did not receive ordered anti-migraine medication resulting in the resident's transfer to the hospital for intractable headaches with vomiting and hypertension. The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] until 12/06/25 for management of intractable migraines. Findings Include: Closed medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including migraine without aura, intractable, with status migrainosus (a severe debilitating migraine attack lasting longer than 72 hours that does not respond to standard treatment and is considered a neurological emergency),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary recommendations were timely implemented and the physician was updated timely on a resident's severe weight loss. Actual harm occurred to Resident #1 when nutrition recommendations were not implemented, and the physician was not updated resulting in the resident sustaining an avoidable 16.6% severe weight loss in one month. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for nutrition.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/02/25 with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, dementia, ventricular tachycardia, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/30/25, revealed Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #1 required staff assistance with eating and had a weight loss of five percent (%) or greater within last month.Review of the physician order dated 06/10/25 revealed an order for oral med pass…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of infection control log, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the facility had a comprehensive infection control program that including tracking and monitoring for infection trends. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include: Review of the infection control trending of infections dated 10/2025 to 03/2026 revealed no evidence the facility was trending for infections. The facility was utilizing a map for trending. In the corner of the map was the key that indicated respiratory was blue, gastrointestinal was green, urinary tract infections (UTI) were yellow, wounds were pink and others were purple. There was no evidence of the type of infections to ensure there was not a pattern. Further review of the infection log dated 12/2025 to 03/2026 revealed the facility started utilizing a new log. In December 2025 the facility had four UTI's that didn't indicate the organism, in January 2026 three UTI's that didn't include organisms, February 2026 seven UTI's that didn't include organisms and two infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of infection-Antibiotic (ATB) Surveillance logs and facility policy, the facility failed to have a qualified designated infection preventionist (IP) who effectively monitored and implemented the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39.Findings include: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE], the facility identified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #97 as the Infection Preventionist (IP).Review of the facility infection control log for March 2026 revealed the facility did not meet the requirements for antibiotic stewardship. Review of the antibiotic stewardship documentation provided by the facility demonstrated a lack of understanding of the importance of receiving hospital documentation to support the need for antibiotics upon return to the facility. In addition, review revealed the timing and accuracy of completing McGeer's evaluations that led to errors in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of concerns forms, review of email communication, interviews, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system that was not able to be turned off until the call light was responded to by staff. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include: Review of an email dated 02/20/26 to the previous Director of Nursing (DON) #100 from Resident #28's daughter revealed Resident #28's daughters' friend was visiting her mother and had called her because the visitor had asked someone walking down the hall to check Resident #28 after waiting a long time for someone to come. That person checked her mom and said she was dry. The friend knew that Resident #28 was not dry because she could smell the urine. Two other people and the physical therapist came in and took Resident #28 to the bathroom. The physical therapist said that since Resident #28 was not bearing any weight on her legs, they would not be able to continue to get her into the bathroom. The daughter was also concerned her mom would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of concerns form, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement appropriate pressure relieving interventions timely to prevent pressure ulcers and failed to identify and treat pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings Include:Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] after sustaining a fall with left femur fracture. Review of Resident #28's risk for skin breakdown related to peripheral vascular disease and incontinence plan of care dated 03/02/18 and revised on 11/29/22 revealed weekly skin assessments, pressure redistribution mattress to bed, consult with wound nurse practitioner as needed, and tubi- grips to both legs on in the morning and off at bedtime. Review of Resident #28's re-admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no skin issues except left hip surgical incision. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in-place per the resident's plan of care. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for accident/hazards. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, hypotension, urinary incontinence, dizziness, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #28's risk for falls/injury related to dizziness, impaired gait, muscle weakness, and use of psychoactive medication plan of care dated 03/02/18 and revised 10/21/25 revealed on 10/21/25 bright color paper used for visual aide to ask for help and use the call light system was added to the interventions. Additional intervention included bright colored tape applied to brake handles as visual reminders, and dycem to seat of wheelchair. Observation on 03/12/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of concern forms, review of meal ticket, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received fluids per order. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for hydration.Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infections, hypotension, gastric reflux, protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #28's dietary note dated 07/17/25 revealed the fluid intake recommendation was 1950 milliliters (ml). Review of a concern form dated 02/12/26 revealed Resident #28's daughter had concerns after her mother fractured left femur, she would be less mobile and had concerns with urinary tract infections and hydration. The resolution included therapy to evaluate, dietary would offer extra fluids as tolerated, would obtain order for UTI stat, (supplement) from physician, and have dietician evaluate resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record. This affected three residents (#18, #27 and #30) of 11 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] admission. Review of the medical record revealed there were no diagnoses listed under the medical diagnoses category, with the medication orders or in the care plan.Interview on 04/01/26 at 8:06 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility missed adding the resident's diagnoses on admission. She verified the diagnoses were added to the medical record on 04/01/26, six days after admission.2. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] after sustaining a fall with left femur fracture.Review of current physician orders included an order dated 06/02/23 for nonskid strips to the bathroom floor in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included ensuring appropriate antibiotic use. This affected three residents (#24, #30, and #31) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 39.Findings include:1.Interview on 03/31/26 at 5:08 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #99 revealed Residents #24 and #30 were currently receiving antibiotics.Review of the March 2026 Infection Incidence Rate for the Month log revealed there were three residents (#10, #15, and #31) entered on the log. The log indicated Residents #15 and #31 met McGeer criteria (McGeer criteria are standardized surveillance definitions used to identify and track infections (UTIs, respiratory, GI, skin) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). They are applied retrospectively to monitor infection rates and ensure consistency across facilities, rather than for initial clinical decision-making). Residents #24 and #30 were not entered on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure exit doors were maintained in good repair to prevent elopement for Resident #50. This affected one (Resident #50) of two residents identified as elopement risk. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, depression, history of falling, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, osteoarthritis, prostatic hyperplasia, hypertension, unsteady on feet, generalized anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The resident was on a regular diet with thin liquids, received boost breeze, he utilized a walker, and an order for a posterior scalp abrasion to clean and leave open to air from a fall. He had orders for elopement bracelets to lock and alarm exit doors. The resident was discharged to a locked facility on 12/10/25.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to safely administer and appropriately document controlled substances. This had the potential to affect 26 residents (Resident #4, #29, #23, #9, #44, #13, #50, #32, #1, #10, #14, #18, #29, #15, #52, #16, #43, #2, #5, #41, #32, #53, #40, #34, #30, and #8) identified as taking controlled substances by the facility. The facility census was 46. Findings include: On 11/25/25 at 8:30 A.M., during medication pass, an observation revealed narcotics sheets were not accurately completed on the medication cart identified as Back. This was confirmed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #140 at the time of the observation.Review of a facility form titled Facility Shift to Shift Narcotic Count Record, labeled Back unit, and dated from 11/18/25 through 11/25/25, revealed on 11/24/25 at 7:00 A.M., the medication sheet count was 15. Through the shift, the document indicated there were three sheets removed; however the final count at 7:00 P.M. remained 15. The next count for 11/24/25 at 7:00 P.M. was 14 medication sheets. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Concern Log, review of the Call Light Audit Report, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff assistance was provided timely for five dependent residents. This affected five (#7, #10, #23, #37, and #30) of six resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 46. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 10/15/25 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, weakness, acute respiratory failure, depression, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation. room [ROOM NUMBER] Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/20/25, revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition and required assistance from staff with ADLs. The MDS indicated the resident required substantial/maximal staff assistance with toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of urine. Review of the Care Plan dated 10/21/25 revealed the intervention for assistance from staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment, review of the daily staffing schedule, review of the Time Punch Detail Hours Report, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of direct care staff to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected five (#7, #10, #23, #30, and #37) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), and had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.Review of the facility assessment, updated September 2025, revealed the general staffing plan is to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time and is determined based on resident population and census. The staffing plan indicated the average number of certified nursing assistants (CNA) required is five. Staffing is reviewed daily and adjusted to meet the needs of the residents. Review of the Daily Staffing Schedule revealed on 11/08/25 the facility census was 46, between 12:19 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's medication administration policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete regarding the administration of controlled substances. This affected five (#9, #19, #23, #4, and #44) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/13/19 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dementia, heart failure, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a physician order dated 08/23/25 revealed the order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth three times for pain. Review of Resident #9's Controlled Drug Record revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg one tablet was administered on 11/18/25 at 8:00 A.M.,12:00 P.M. and 7:00 P.M. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely report a suspicion of misappropriation of narcotics. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 46. Findings include:Review revealed there was not a recent Self-Reported Incident (SRI) filed with the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) related to misappropriation. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 11/05/25 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, hypertension, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus, conversion disorder with seizures, and chronic kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 11/25/25 at 10:54 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed on 11/20/25 she was answering a question regarding a narcotic with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 when she opened the narcotic book she noticed several blank entries with the same handwriting indicating Registered Nurse (RN) #126's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene and management of soiled linens during incontinence care. The affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 46. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/21/25. Diagnoses included chest pain, unspecified; atherosclerotic heart disease; essential hypertension; cerebrovascular disease; old myocardial infarction; paranoid schizophrenia; and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of unspecified femur.Review of a care plan for Resident #5 , dated 10/21/25, revealed the resident needed assistance from staff to meet activities of daily living (ADL) needs due to decreased mobility. Staff was to assist resident with incontinent care, toileting, bed mobility, dressing, and laundry.On 11/24/25 at 10:10 A.M., an observation of incontinence care for Resident #5 revealed the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #115 failed to maintain infection control while performing incontinence care. After cleansing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents' urinary incontinence to determine type of bladder incontinence and failed to develop and implement an appropriate treatment plan to maintain and/or restore the residents' bladder function. This affected two residents (#45 and #57) of three residents reviewed for urinary incontinence. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, difficulty walking, encephalopathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #45's record revealed the resident was incontinent of bladder due to unaware of toileting needs at this time. Review of the plan of care dated 11/19/24 revealed to assist the resident to the bathroom per resident request, assist with incontinence care, and assist with pads/briefs/pull ups. a. Review of Resident #45's admission and modification Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen concentrator alarm was addressed timely. This affected one resident (#45) of three residents observed with oxygen concentrators. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on supplement oxygen, pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use. Review of Resident #45's current orders dated 03/2025 revealed to check oxygen saturation twice daily and continuous oxygen at three liters via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #45's cardiac impairment related to hypertension, coronary heart disease (CAD), and hyperlipidemia and potential for alteration in respiratory function related to COPD plan of care dated 11/19/24 revealed to administer oxygen as ordered. Observation on 03/10/25 at 10:04 A.M., revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident representative and the physician of a change in health status. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy, hypertension, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and history of Coronavirus (COVID)-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #35 required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident had no chewing or swallowing difficulties. Review of the admission record revealed Family Representative #500 was listed as the resident's emergency contact. Review of nursing progress note, dated 09/13/24 at 2:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were in place prior to the use of a reclining safety and enabling chair. This affected one resident (#34) of one resident reviewed for potential restraint use. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Observation of Resident #34 throughout the annual survey from 09/23/24 to 09/30/24 revealed the resident utilizing a reclining geri chair (a large, reclining, mobile and padded chair that's designed to help people with limited mobility sit and stand comfortably). Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/02/21 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, white matter disease and diabetes mellitus. Further review of Resident #34's medical record including Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 07/03/24 indicated the resident had a significantly impaired cognition level and no restraints were used. Review of Resident #34's physician's orders revealed no evidence of any physician's order in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents accurately reflected a new diagnosis and medications. This affected two residents (#38 and #16) of four residents reviewed for PASRR documents. The census was 51. Findings Include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, dementia, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and asthma. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/31/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition and a diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident #38's PASRR document, dated 08/29/24, revealed under Section D, no was selected incorrectly indicating there was not a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the diagnosis list revealed Resident #38 was diagnosed with dementia on 06/26/24. During interview on 09/24/24 at 5:29 P.M., Corporate Registered Nurse #201 confirmed Resident #38's PASRR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review assessments were completed accurately upon admission to the facility. This affected two residents (#16 and #20) of four residents reviewed for admission assessments. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/04/24 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completed on 04/05/24 revealed Resident #20 had a prior diagnosis which included a mood disorder. No psychotropic medications were identified as currently prescribed for the resident. Review of Resident #20's admission medication orders on 04/04/24 revealed the use of Lamictal (mood stabilization medication) 25 milligrams two tablets every day. Further review of the PASRR dated 04/05/24 indicated no current use of medications. On 09/24/24 at 1:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely treatment as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy, hypertension, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and history of Coronavirus (COVID)-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of a physician order, dated 09/13/24 at 4:00 P.M., revealed the order for Furosemide 40 milligrams (mg), to be injected intramuscularly (IM) one time a day for swelling, for three days. Review of nursing progress note, dated 09/13/24 at 4:02 P.M., revealed Resident #35 had continued swelling of bilateral legs and was not compliant with elevating her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received appropriate services to maintain mobility and prevent further decrease in range of motion. This affected one resident (#9) of two residents reviewed for mobility. The census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tremor, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 08/05/24, indicated Resident #9's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 03, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was totally dependent on staff for putting on/taking off footwear, lower body dressing, and transfers. The resident had impairment of both lower extremities. Review of the Care Plan, dated 07/07/23, revealed Resident #9 had the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiomyopathy, hypertension, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and history of Coronavirus (COVID)-19. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/13/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, which indicated severely impaired cognition. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident did not receive oxygen therapy. Review of physician orders, dated September 2024, revealed no order for oxygen therapy. Review of nursing progress note, dated 09/13/24 at 2:08 P.M., revealed Resident #35 was sitting up on the side of her bed and stated she was having a hard time laying down as it caused shortness of breath.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory results were performed to ensure adequate monitoring of medication and failed to ensure abnormal laboratory results were addressed appropriately. This affected two residents (#28 and #47) of six resident reviewed for medication review. Findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #28's cumulative current diagnoses list revealed the resident had hyperlipidemia on admission, however there was no documented evidence of the diagnosis of hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had hyperlipidemia however there was no documented evidence of diagnosis of hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #28's medication orders dated 01/10/23 to 09/26/24 revealed on admission the resident was ordered pravastatin 80 milligrams (mg) daily for hyperlipidemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, hospital record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications had an appropriate indication for use. This affected one resident (#50) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/24 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, anxiety, dementia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medications for Resident #50 revealed on 08/05/24 Depakote (seizure medication and for mood stabilization) 250 milligram (mg) twice daily was prescribed. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence of any physician or certified nurse practitioner evaluation which indicated a diagnosis of seizure disorder or why the medication was initiated. Review of hospital records prior to transfer to the facility revealed no evidence of any prior seizure disorder or use of Depakote. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of August and September 2024 for Resident #50 revealed Depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer psychotropic medications as ordered. This affected one resident (#8) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/24 with admission diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mood disorder, depression and anxiety. Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed on 09/23/24 the psychiatric certified nurse practitioner (CNP) evaluated Resident #8 and increased the dosage of Depakote (medication for mood disorders) from 250 milligrams (mg) twice daily to 250 mg two tablets in the morning and 250 mg every night. Review of Resident #8's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed after the increased Depakote order was initiated by the CNP on 09/23/24, the new order was transcribed incorrectly into the medical record medication orders and MAR which resulted in Resident #8 to receive two 250 mg tablets in the morning, 250 mg at night and 500 mg every day. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received dental care timely for ill-fitting dentures and dentures were readily accessible to the resident. This affected one resident (#21) of two reviewed for dental. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia, needing assistance with personal care, gastro-esophageal reflux, and heart disease. Review of Resident #21's census revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was hospitalized from [DATE] to 09/17/24. Interview and observation on 09/23/24 at 1:30 P.M., with Resident #21 revealed he had sores on his gums related to his upper dentures were ill fitting and his bottom dentures have been missing since he returned from the hospital last week (09/17/24). The resident removed his upper denture to show the surveyor the sores he had on the top gum line and that he had no bottom dentures. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on infection control log review, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents had an appropriate indication for the use of antibiotics. This affected three residents (#3, #16 and #44) of eight residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the facility infection control log for the months of July, August and September 2024 revealed 28 resident infections which did not meet McGeer's criteria (assessment to determine if antibiotics are appropriate to be utilized). Review of the following resident records revealed the following: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/21/24 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Review of the infection control log revealed on 07/17/24 Resident #3 had a urinary tract infection which did not meet McGeer's criteria. Physician's orders on 07/17/24 revealed Resident #3 was prescribed Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the facility's concern log, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staffing to ensure call lights were responded to in a timely manner and to meet the total care needs of all residents. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's concern log dated 11/01/21 to 10/27/22 revealed a concern, dated 07/28/22 indicating call lights needed to be answered more quickly. The facility response included the Director of Nursing (DON) re-educated staff on call lights and the facility's expectations. During the survey, the following resident concerns related to staffing were voiced: a. On 11/07/22 at 9:45 A.M. interview with Resident #7 revealed a concern that it took a while to receive staff assistance after activating the call light. The resident was unable to provide any specifics or quantify the time. b. On 11/07/22 at 10:06 A.M. interview with Resident #20 revealed concerns there were times she was unable to participate in activities because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Identification Screen was completed to determine if Resident #4 needed specialized services. This affected one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed diagnoses including psychosis, generalized anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and auditory and visual hallucinations. According to the diagnosis list, the schizophrenia diagnosis was present upon admission on [DATE]. Resident #4 had orders for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa and antidepressant Lexapro. Resident #4 was under the services of a psychiatrist. A PASARR, dated 05/03/22 indicated Resident #4 had no diagnoses of mental disorders listed, no disruption in usual living arrangement over the prior two years, and was not prescribed psychotropic medication in the prior six months. On 11/09/22 at 8:49 A.M. the Administrator verified the PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and Resident #96, who required staff assistance with activities of daily living received timely and adequate assistance with personal care, including facial hair removal. This affected two residents (#4 and #96) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed diagnoses including congestive heart failure, psychosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, depression, schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain, auditory and visual hallucinations, heart failure, macular degeneration, osteoarthritis, and generalized muscle weakness. A care plan initiated 05/30/22 indicated Resident #4 needed assistance from staff to meet activities of daily living needs. Interventions included assisting with meals, ambulation, hair care, incontinence care, oral care, toileting, transfers, bed mobility, dressing, and bathing as needed. The care plan did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and care for Resident #28 related a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus including clarification of a physician's order for administration of sliding scale insulin. This affected one resident (#28) of five residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and diabetes mellitus. Record review revealed on 06/13/22 Resident #28 had a physician order for enteral (tube) feeding at night between 8:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M., Novolog insulin 15 milliliters to be administered three times a day, and Novolin R insulin four times a day per sliding scale. On 06/13/22, the Novolin R was discontinued and an order was written for Novolog insulin to be administered four times a day per a sliding scale two hours after Resident #28 ate to see if blood glucose levels had gone down with the regular dose administered. The times were listed as 6:30 A.M., 10:30 A.M., 3:30 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. The routine Novolog insulin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #10, who had an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate services to prevent urinary tract infections. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility identified four residents with urinary catheters. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract), Parkinson's disease, and osteoarthritis. A care plan, initiated 09/06/22 indicated Resident #10 had an indwelling urinary catheter related to urinary retention with hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that caused swelling of kidneys) and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The goal was for Resident #10 to be free of infection. Review of physician's antibiotic orders and progress notes revealed Resident #10 was treated for a urinary tract infection beginning 07/29/22 and started treatment for a possible urinary tract infection on 10/04/22 related to (urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics. This affected 19 residents (#18, #14, #17, #28, #149, #29, #46, #150, #3, #40, #45, #299, #35, #39, #20, #196, #12, #5 and #151) and had the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility: Findings Include: Review of the antibiotic stewardship program/infection control log dated 10/2019 to 12/2019 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 revealed: a. In October 2019 there were ten infections. Resident #18 was started on Cipro for a urinary tract infection (UTI) before the culture had returned. The culture indicated the resident was resistance against Cipro and she was switched to Amoxicillin. Resident #14 was treated with Keflex for and unidentified source and did not meet criteria. Resident #17 received Keflex for a UTI without evidence of urine culture. There was no form completed to ensure the resident met criteria. Resident #28 was treated with Daptomycin antibiotic and the culture indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin involving Resident #46 to the State agency as required. This affected one resident (#46) of five residents reviewed for falls. Findings Include: Review of Resident #46's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with aphasia (inability to speak). Review of the nurse's note, dated 11/16/19 at 6:45 P.M. and authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #16 revealed the nurse was called to Resident #46's room. The note indicated upon arrival to the room, the resident was observed standing naked, walking away from the doorway with copious amounts of blood noted to the floor surrounding the resident. The resident had facial injuries with excessive amounts of blood on his head, face and chest. Pressure was applied to a large laceration above the resident's right eye and the resident was assisted to a seated position on his bed. The nurse was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized restorative ambulation and transfer program for Resident #46 following the resident's discharge from therapy as recommended. This affected one resident (#46) of four residents reviewed for restorative nursing services. Findings Include: Review of Resident #46's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with aphasia (inability to speak). The resident was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital with a history of falls and inability to ambulate with recommendations for occupational therapy (OT) due to functional mobility, dressing and transfer decline. The resident was also noted to have deficits in strength, balance and coordination affecting his functional mobility and transfer ability requiring physical therapy (PT) at the time of admission. Record review revealed the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a wound specimen was obtained timely and antibiotic treatment was initiated timely for Resident #29. This affected one resident (#29) of two residents reviewed for non- pressure skin alterations. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including open wound of ankle, anemia, acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right lower extremity, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #29's wound center orders, dated 10/11/19 revealed new orders to obtain a wound aerobic and anaerobic positive gram stain (to be collected by the facility on 10/11/19). Review of Resident #29's progress notes dated 10/11/19 revealed at 4:00 P.M., the resident returned from the wound center with new orders to obtain a sample from the resident's right lateral ankle and send to the laboratory in the morning. At 4:07 P.M., the specimen was obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure restorative range of motion services and/or splints were implemented per the plan of care for Resident #3 and Resident #38 and failed to ensure restorative staff were knowledgeable of the types of range of motion exercises to be provided. This affected two residents (#3 and #38) of four residents reviewed for positioning and restorative/rehabilitation. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #3's physical therapy notes, dated 09/30/19 the revealed resident was discharged to skilled nursing facility with recommendations including restorative nursing. Review of Resident #3's occupational therapy notes dated 09/30/19 revealed the resident was discharged from therapy with recommendations for transfer and functional mobility including decrease balance. Review of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 received timely dental services. This affected one resident (#9) of one resident reviewed for dental care. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness and a history of falling. Review of Resident #9's dental health notes revealed Resident #9 was seen by the dentist on 05/24/19 and a new lower partial was recommended so the resident could chew better. Review of Resident #9's oral status, dated 10/02/19 failed to identify the resident had a broken or loosely fitting partial denture. Review of Resident #9's oral cavity assessment, dated 10/07/19 revealed the resident had some teeth loss, but failed to identify she had a lower partial or the condition of the lower partial. Review of Resident #9's care plan, dated 12/10/19 revealed the resident was at risk for oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during a pressure ulcer dressing change for Resident #27 to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#27) of one resident observed for wound care. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility 05/18/19 with diagnoses including Stage III pressure ulcer to right shoulder and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Observation on 12/10/19 from 8:46 A.M. to 9:02 A.M., revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #19 placed supplies (clear trash bag, two alcohol wipes, gauze package, alginate (AG) package, and a foam dressing package) on an uncleaned bedside table. She wiped half of the bedside table with a wet paper towel and placed the clear trash bag over the half of the bedside table. She removed scissors from her pocket and cleansed them with one of the alcohol wipes and then placed them down on the clear plastic bag. The nurse removed the old dressing and performed hand hygiene with soap and water and applied new non-sterile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COUNTRY CLUB REHABILITATION CAMPUS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLLAND GROUP II, LTD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 58% | since 01/01/2012 |
| HOLLAND, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 22% | since 01/01/2012 |
| GRESOCK, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HOLLAND, BENJAMIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HOLLAND, NICHOLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HOLLAND, NOAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HOLLAND-GRESOCK, ADAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HOLLAND-GRESOCK, PATRICIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| MUIRDEN-HOLLAND, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2006 |
| HARRIS, JANET | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2008 |
| KUREISHY, ZAVEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2008 |
| MARONI, ANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2008 |
| HOLLAND-GRESCOCK, TERESA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $861K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365699. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.