Blue Ash Health & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.483 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to prevent constipation. This resulted in harm on 08/22/2024 when Resident #15 was sent to the hospital and received treatment for a large fecal impaction. This affected one of three resident sampled for constipation. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, stage IV sacral pressure ulcer, unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified major depressive disorder, and hemiplegia with hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, occasionally rejected care, and did not wander. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure documentation of medication being administered was charted in residents' electronic medication administration record. (Emar). This affected 11 residents (Resident #60, #62, #64, #66, #68, #70, #72, #74, #76, #78, and #80) of the 12 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 35. Findings include:Review of the medical records for Resident #60, #62, #64, #66, #68, #70, #72, #74, #76, #78, and #80 revealed each resident had physician orders to receive nighttime or evening medications. Continued review of each resident's electronic medication administration record revealed medication was not documented as being administered for the evening of 05/26/2026. Attempted contact on 05/29/2026 at 2:10 P.M. and again at 3:20 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #131 who was the nurse noted to have worked the evening of 05/26/2026 with no success. A voice message could not be left due to the voice mail box not being set up at that time. Attempted to contacted LPN #116 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had hot water in resident areas per resident preferences. This affected 18 residents (#02, #06, #08, #09, #10, #11, #12, #17, #18, #19, #23, #24, #25, #32, #33, #34, #35, and #36) out of 36 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 36.Interview with Resident #08 on 03/12/26 at 8:17 A.M. revealed the water did not get hot at the facility. Resident #08 stated the water was also cold during bathing.Interview with Resident #11 on 03/12/26 at 8:19 A.M. revealed the water was cold at the facility and did not get hot. Resident #11 stated the water had been cold for approximately two months. Interview with Resident #17 on 03/12/26 at 8:39 A.M. revealed one side of the building had cold water for a long time. Observation of Maintenance Director #70 taking the water temperatures in the facility on 03/12/26 at 9:00 A.M. revealed the water temperature in Resident #02's bathroom was 135.9 degrees Fahrenheit, the water temperature in Resident #06 and Resident #07's bathroom was 69.7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain mechanical equipment to heat residents' rooms. This affected four Residents (#33, #34, #35, and #36) out of four Residents reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential primary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), hyperlipidemia, insomnia, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus (DM), and anxiety disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #34 dated 11/20/25, revealed he was cognitively intact.Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included essential primary hypertension, asthma, intermittent explosive disorder, heart failure, anemia, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 40.Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, seizure, malignant neoplasm of the intrathoracic lymph node, delusional disorder, atrial fibrillation, essential primary hypertension, and multiple sclerosis.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognition. Resident #19 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL).Review of the SRI (control number 266147) created on 10/08/25 at 1:41 P.M. related to an injury of unknown origin identified on 10/08/25. Resident #19 alleged Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #97 grabbed her arms during a disagreement and left discoloration. The facility collected statements from LPN #97 and Resident #19.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment related to residents smoking. This affected one (Resident #36) of the one resident observed for smoking. The facility census was 40.Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #36 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, dysphagia, essential primary hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus (DM).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Resident #36 was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #36 required set up assistance from staff with eating, oral hygiene, toilet use, and supervision with bathing. He was independent with upper body dressing, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene.Review of the active care plan for Resident #36 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment for preparing and serving food and failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints while in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility as the facility identified all residents received food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation on 06/29/25 at 9:36 A.M., of the steam table in the kitchen with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #354, revealed a wooden panel of compressed wood, nailed to the side of the steam table. The top of the wooden panel, located even with the surface of the steam table, and extending the depth of the steam table, was observed to be significantly deteriorated and porous, with a beige fibrous material. Interview with DS #354 at the same time, verified the wooden panel was deteriorated, porous, and was not able to be cleaned. DS #354 stated the wooden panel had been in the stated condition when he started approximately three months prior. Observation on 06/30/25 at 10:26 A.M. with DS #354, revealed a fan, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a facility Tuberculosis (TB) Risk Assessment. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure all newly hired employees were tested for TB and employees employed by the facility for more than a year were screened annually for TB. This affected four (Business Office Manager [BOM] #410, Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #305, Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] #361, and CNA #332) of the five personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents of the facility. Findings Include: 1. Interview on 07/01/25 at 2:58 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility does not do a Tuberculosis Risk Assessment. Review of the facility provided documentation at the same time with the Administrator, revealed the facility had TB Risk Assessment. Review of the facility policy titled Tuberculosis Risk Assessment (not dated) states a Tuberculosis Risk Assessment shall be conducted annually. 2. Review of BOM #410's personnel file revealed BOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of facility documents, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comfortable and safe temperatures were maintained throughout the facility in resident rooms and common areas. This had the potential to affect the 10 residents residing on the facility's A-hall (#03, #04, #07, #13, #16, #26, #36, #52, #204, and #206), the 13 residents residing on the facility's B-hall (#01, #02, #10, #17, #19, #24, #29, #35, #37, #39, #43, #47, and #50. The facility identified 16 residents who routinely ate meals in the dining room (#01, #02, #06, #11, #12, #15, #16, #20, #27, #30, #36, #37, #39, #40, #46, and #47). The facility census was 53 residents. Findings include: Observation on 06/29/25 at 10:35 A.M. revealed the Administrator was taking air temperatures with an infrared laser digital thermometer with the following results: 86.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F) at the beginning of A-hall, closest to the entrance of the building, 81.7 degrees in the second half of A-hall adjacent to the nurses' station, 84.9 degrees F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0579 — isolated
  Provide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents with information regarding how to apply for Medicaid benefits. This affected one (Resident #53) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 11/20/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), opioid dependence, cocaine abuse, pulmonary hypertension, bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder and a discharge date of 04/02/25. Review of a notice of adverse determination from the Medicaid provider for Resident #53 dated 03/28/25 revealed the resident no longer needed daily nursing care and her care needs could be met in a lower level of care. The document also included information for the resident with the opportunity to file a grievance against the decision or appeal the decision. Review of a social services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of personnel files, review of the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) background check logs, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement their policy by failing to conduct criminal background checks. This affected two (Residents #08 and #156) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 53 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility SRI dated 01/31/25 revealed the facility substantiated an allegation of misappropriation of funds from Resident #08 and #156's resident fund accounts per Business Office Manager (BOM) #410. The facility contacted the local police who investigated the allegation, BOM #410, was terminated, and the facility replaced the residents' funds. Review of the personnel file for BOM #410 revealed a hire date of 12/16/24 and a termination date of 02/03/25. The file did not include a criminal background check completed upon hire for BOM #410. Review of the facility BCI log revealed BOM #410 was hired on 12/16/24, but BCI checks were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BAO OPCO HOLDINGS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH