Trotwood Health & Rehab LLC
4911 Covenant House Drive, Dayton, OH 45426 · For profit - Individual · 67 certified beds · (937) 837-2651 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (86) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $130,712 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (89%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 83.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 29.8 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 89% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
86 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 72 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of a police report, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were from staff to resident physical abuse with serious injury. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 04/18/26 at approximately 10:40 A.M. when Dietary Aide (DA) #51 punched Resident #4 in the face. Resident #4 was admitted to the hospital with a broken jaw. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 29 residents. On 04/23/26 at 10:32 A.M., the Administrator was notified Immediate Jeopardy began on 04/18/26 at approximately 10:40 A.M. when DA #51 punched Resident #4. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 04/24/26 when the facility implemented the following corrective actions: On 04/18/26 at 10:40 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #86 separated DA #51 and Resident #4 to provide for resident safety and obtained assistance from Registered Nurse (RN) #71. On 04/18/26 at 10:42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to follow facility procedures for leave of absences (LOAs), failed to implement interventions and provide education to residents and family members to reduce falls and incidents while on LOAs, and failed to investigate causative factors and determine a root cause analysis of repeated fall incidents while on LOA from the facility. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #100 left the facility for LOAs with family and had repeated fall incidents and injuries during the LOAs. Resident #100 was seen in the emergency room on multiple occasions for fractures and dislocation of the left hip and fracture of the left femur which required hospitalization and surgical intervention. This affected one (#100) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 04/22/22. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and family interviews, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were initiated and sustained to prevent unplanned weight loss for one (#52) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #52 who experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 25.9 percent (%) in less than a one-month period of time. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 07/10/23 with diagnoses including bacteremia, cannabis abuse, cocaine abuse, pneumonia, protein calorie malnutrition, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #52 dated 07/11/23 revealed resident was at risk for nutrition/hydration problems related to mechanically altered diet, need for tube feed, underweight body mass index (BMI) noted, noncompliant with obtaining weights, prefers to stop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff, family, and Wound Physician (WP) #315 interviews, review of facility policy, review of wound physician notes, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to implement interventions/treatments to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and/or aid in the healing of existing pressure ulcers as ordered by the physician. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #35 was found to have avoidable pressure ulcers which were first identified as a stage III pressure ulcer on his right heel on 09/21/22 and an avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer in the palm of his left hand discovered at the time of the survey on 11/02/22. This affected one resident (#35) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 01/08/14. Diagnoses included, left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), aphasia, dysphagia, and congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (#02) out of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 31.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 09/04/18. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, aphasia following cerebral infarction, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #02 was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and bed mobility, and was dependent for toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfer.Observation on 06/14/26 at 9:59 A.M. revealed Resident #02 was sitting in bed with the breakfast tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure air temperatures were maintained within comfortable ranges for the residents. This affected all 33 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Observation of the main entrance of the facility during entrance on 12/17/25 at 8:36 A.M., revealed the air temperature felt very cool. Observation of the facility on 12/17/25 at 9:00 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #06, revealed the MD #06 used a hand-held infrared thermometer and recorded temperatures in the main entrance between 51.2 and 56.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). These areas included the main entrance of the facility, the administration offices, the resident ' s dining room, common hallways leading to the resident ' s rooms, the chapel and a common gathering room. Observation revealed two auxiliary fireplace looking heaters in the dining room and an additional auxiliary fireplace looking heater in the common gathering area. Interview with MD #06 at the same time verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to accommodate the residents who wanted to eat in the dining room. This had the potential to affect 25 residents who the facility identified as receiving meals from the kitchen and were able to eat in the dining room. The facility census was 33.Findings include:Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/20. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, extrapyramidal and movement disorder and cardiac murmur.Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #23 revealed she was cognitively intact, and she was independent with eating. Observation of the main entrance of the facility which included the resident's dining room during entrance on 12/17/25 at 8:36 A.M., revealed the air temperature felt very cool. Observation of the facility on 12/17/25 at 9:00 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #06, revealed the MD #06 used a hand-held infrared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of personnel files, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Program was directed by a qualified Activity Director (AD). This had the potential to affect 32 residents interested in and/or actively participating in activities. The facility census was 33.Findings include:Review of Resident Council meeting attendance sheets revealed AD #10 did not sign the attendance forms for 09/18/25, 10/23/25 and 11/20/25. The meetings were facilitated and signed by Activities Aid (AA) #08.Interview on 12/17/25 at 12:45 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON) stated she had not been informed of any concerns expressed by the residents at the Resident Council meetings from September, October or November 2025, and it was the responsibility of the activities staff to keep the facility management informed of any resident concerns. The DON stated she had no knowledge if AD #10 met the qualifications to be the Activities Director. Interview on 12/17/25 at 1:15 P.M., AA #08 stated she attended the Resident Council meetings and had been recording the meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all essential mechanical equipment (boiler) was maintained in a functional and safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility.Findings Include: Observation of the main entrance of the facility during entrance on 12/17/25 at 8:36 A.M., revealed the air temperature felt very cool. Observation of the facility on 12/17/25 at 9:00 A.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #06, revealed the MD #06 used a hand-held infrared thermometer and recorded temperatures in the main entrance between 51.2 and 56.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). These areas included the main entrance of the facility, the administration offices, the resident ' s dining room, common hallways leading to the resident ' s rooms, the chapel and a common gathering room. Observation revealed two auxiliary fireplace looking heaters in the dining room and an additional auxiliary fireplace looking heater in the common gathering area. Interview with MD #06 at the same time verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures. This affected 16 (#27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, and #42) of 16 residents who resided on the 400 and 500 halls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to comfortable water temperatures. This affected 26 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25 and #26) residents who resided on the 100, 200 and 300 halls. The facility census was 42.Findings include:1. Interview on 08/18/25 at 12:07 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility's air conditioner was not working on the 400 and 500 halls. The Administrator stated companies had been out to evaluate the system, but it had not yet been repaired. The Administrator stated the system needed to be replaced. Observation on 08/18/25 from 1:15 P.M. through 2:00 P.M., with Maintenance Director (MD) #255, revealed Resident #28's room was 83.3 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of food delivery invoices and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored and further failed to ensure dishes were clean and sanitized in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 42. Finding include:1. Interview on 08/18/25 at 10:13 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility's freezer did not work. The Administrator stated an air compressor was received to repair the freezer, but the repair did not fix it. The Administrator stated the facility did not use frozen food at this time. Observation on 08/18/25 at 10:18 A.M. of the freezer revealed that it was empty and contained no food items. Further observation of refrigerator number two revealed foods that should have been stored in the freezer, including eight 32-ounce bags of carrots, one 40 count box of sausage patties, one 12-pound box of sliced beef, 12 pounds of turkey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and home-like environment by ensuring heating/air conditioning units in resident rooms were properly functioning. This affected five (#10, #12, #35, #36, and #43) out of ten residents reviewed for complaints of air conditioning not working. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Interview on 06/10/25 at 8:36 A.M. with Resident #12 stated the heating/air conditioner unit does not work in her room. Interview on 06/10/25 at 9:25 A.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #212 stated the heating/air conditioning units in all residents rooms are working. MS #212 confirmed resident could control the heating/air conditioning in their rooms. Interview on 06/10/25 at 9:31 A.M. with Resident #35 stated the heating/air conditioner unit does not work in his room. Interview on 06/10/25 at 9:43 A.M. with Resident #10 stated the heating/air conditioner unit does not work in her room. Interview on 06/10/25 at 10:04 A.M. with Resident #36 stated the heating/air conditioner unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (#10) out of three reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 05/30/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, post-traumatic stress disorder, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident required supervision assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the care plan dated 06/09/25 revealed resident had a potential for behavior problems related to anxiety and depression with interventions of administer medication as ordered, allow resident to discuss feelings, and approach/speak to resident in a calm voice. Interview on 06/10/25 at 2:23 P.M. with Resident #10 stated Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was adequately control. This affected one (#19) out of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 05/22/25 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, essential (primary) hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia without coma, polyneuropathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the care plan dated 05/22/25 revealed resident is at risk for pain related to diagnoses of polyneuropathy, history of displaced Bimalleolar fracture of the right lower extremity with interventions of administer medication as ordered, monitor for pain every shift, and notify physician as needed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident required supervision assistance with eating, oral hygiene, wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 72 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10's medications were administered as ordered and failed to ensure Resident #46's pain medication was timely reordered/available for administration. This affected two (#10 and #46) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 05/30/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, edema, post-traumatic stress disorder, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the care plan dated 05/30/25 revealed Resident #10 is at risk for altered cardiac output related to diagnosis of hypertension with interventions of administer medication as ordered and obtain Vital signs as ordered and as needed (PRN). Notify physician as needed. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the building and furnishings were in good repair. This affected Resident #43 and the 19 residents residing in the in the 300/400 hall (#2, #3, #8, #10, #11, #14, #18, #21, #23, #28, #32, #37, #39, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, and #46). The facility census was 47 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 02/17/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #43 dated 05/21/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 06/04/25 at 9:10 A.M. of Resident #43's room revealed there was a hole in the wall approximately 18 inches above the baseboard which measured approximately nine inches in diameter. Interview on 06/04/25 at 9:10 A.M. with Resident #43 confirmed the hole in his wall had been there when he was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment with working showers. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility also failed to provide a clean floor for Resident #36. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Interview and observation on 03/26/25 at 9:00 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #255 confirmed the 500-hallway shower room was the only shower room used by all residents in the facility. LPN #255 confirmed the first two shower room stalls were not functioning. She confirmed the dirt, debris, and trash scattered all over the floor of the shower room. LPN #255 confirmed the lights in the 500-hall shower room contained multiple brown items that appeared to be bugs. LPN #255 confirmed the bathroom stall had a sign that read, Do Not Use, dated 01/22/25. LPN #255 opened the bathroom stall door next to the shower stall and the toilet had various pieces of colored tape on it. The toilet contained black water.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physicians orders. There were two medication errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in a 6.45 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (Residents #40 and #47) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/14/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive disease, cystocele, overactive bladder, depression, cognitive communication, and anxiety disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Resident #40 required setup or clean up assistance for meals, and oral care. Resident #40 required supervision or touching assistance for bathing, dressing upper and lower body, toilet hygiene, personal hygiene, and placing shoes on and off feet. Review of physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe manner. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident observed for medication storage. The facility census was 45. Findings include, Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included alcohol dependent withdrawal, emphysema, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, polycythemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, hypokalemia, foot drop, irritable bowel syndrome, delusional disorder, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, pleural effusion, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/18/25, revealed Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and this indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #19 required set up, clean up assistance for meals, and oral care. Resident #19 required supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment. This affected one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for comfortable temperatures. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of medical records for Resident #46 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychosis, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #46 required supervision and touching for meals, personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, placing shoes on and off, dressing upper and lower body, and oral care. Observation on 02/26/25 from 9:53 A.M. through 10:20 A.M. of Resident #46's room revealed the door was open and the temperature was 66 degrees Fahrenheit. There was a heater outside the door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of medical records for Resident #44 revealed an admission date on 08/24/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, delusional disorder, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Resident #44 had required extensive bed mobility assistance, one-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers in bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 12/18/24 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for pain related to muscle spasm, post procedural pain, and chronic pain. Interventions included to administer medication as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from medication error rate less than 5%. A total of 30 opportunities were observed with two errors observed, resulting in a 6.6% medication error rate. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of medical records for Resident #44 revealed an admission date on 08/24/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, delusional disorder, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. Resident #44 required extensive bed mobility assistance, one-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers in bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. Review of physician order dated 08/20/24 revealed Resident #44 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, review of the facility census and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure air temperatures were maintained within comfortable ranges for residents residing on the secure behavioral unit (100 hall). This had the potential to affect 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13) residents who resided on the secure behavior unit (100 hall). The census was 49. Findings include: Observation of the secure behavioral unit (100 hall) on 01/21/25 from 4:16 P.M. to 4:30 with Maintenance Director (MD) #110 and the Administrator revealed air temperatures were below 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A check of room air temperatures revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was at 43.6 degrees F, room [ROOM NUMBER] was at 55 degrees F, and room [ROOM NUMBER] was at 51.1 degrees F. The air temperature in all 12 rooms ranged from 43.6 F to 55 F. Two portable heating units were present in the hallway. Residents were observed in the secure behavioral unit and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident, staff and physician office staff interviews, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services by failing to provide assistance with a resident's medical appointments to an outside provider. This affected one (#21) of three residents reviewed for medical appointments. The facility census was 51. Findings include Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, hypertension, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #21 required set up or clean up assistance for eating, supervision or touching assistance for toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the Resident Appointment Sheet for Resident #21 revealed an appointment for unknown physician on 10/17/24 with a pickup time scheduled for 1:45 P.M. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and pharmacist interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physicians orders, failed to ensure licensed nursing staff accurately documented the administration of medications in the medical record and failed to ensure medications were re-ordered/available from the pharmacy. This affected two (#52 and #21) of three reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 51. Findings include 1. Medical record review for Resident #52 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hydronephrosis, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive uropathy, thyroid disorder, anxiety, and schizophrenia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #52 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #52 required maximum assistance for eating, toileting, and moderate assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of nursing schedules and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the supervision by a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours daily. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: Review of nursing schedule dated 06/16/24 revealed there was no RN scheduled. Interview on 07/17/24 at 9:43 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have an RN work on 06/16/24.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, comfortable environment for all residents. This affected 32(#01, #02, #03, #05, #06, #08, #09, #10, #12, #17, #18, #19, #22, #23, #27, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #36, #37, #41, #42, #44, #46, #47, #49, #50, #51, #53, and #54) of the 52 residents observed for environment. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Observation of the secured Memory Care Unit (MCU) on 07/08/24 at 10:20 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #341, revealed a very dirty, upswept, light brown laminate wood floors that were 80 percent (%) stained with black coloring throughout the middle of the hall. The entire floor had food crumbs scattered throughout the halls, soda cans and other trash debris in the floor. Interview with STNA #341 on 07/08/24 at 10:28 A.M., verified the environmental conditions of the secured MCU. 2. Observation of Resident #44's room on 07/08/24 at 11:40 A.M., revealed the resident's room felt warm. Interview with Resident #44 at the same time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not have access to knives, razors, and smoking materials and smokers were supervised while smoking. This affected Residents #50, #29, #48 and #107. The facility identified 28 Residents (#01, #03, #04, #07, #09, #16, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #24, #27, #30, #31, #34, #35, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #44, #48, #50, #51, #53, and #54) who smoked. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 09/14/23. Diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition and was independently mobile. Review of the Smoking Assessment for Resident #50 dated 06/12/24 revealed the resident needed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the dishwasher manual, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was functioning to clean and sanitize dishes appropriately. This had the potential to affect 51 of 52 residents in the facility. The facility identified one resident (#15) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Interview on 07/11/24 at 8:51 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #502 confirmed she had called for the dishwasher to be serviced on 07/08/24 and the sanitizer concentration levels had read 0 parts per million (ppm) for a few weeks. DS #502 further confirmed the dishwasher remained in use during the time the sanitizer levels read 0 ppm. DS #502 stated the sanitizer level should be at 50 ppm for safe use. Observation on 07/11/24 at 9:00 A.M. revealed there was a sign on the dish machine indicating the sanitizer level should be 50 ppm for proper use. Observation on 07/11/24 at 9:01 A.M. revealed DS #502 tested the sanitizer level with a test strip and the test strip did not change color indicating the machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices were placed in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected five (#14, #15, #16, #28, and #33) of five residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, osteomyelitis, alcohol dependence, open wound right ankle, systemic lupus, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #14 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, refused care daily, and required supervision or touching assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the non pressure skin grid for Resident #14 dated 07/05/24 revealed the resident had an unstageable vascular ulcer to his right lower extremity. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations. This affected five (Resident #2, #5, #16, #33, and #47) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/25/23. Further review of the record revealed it did not include documentation regarding receipt or refusal of the pneumococcal or influenza vaccines. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23. Further review of the record revealed it did not include documentation regarding receipt or refusal of the pneumococcal or influenza vaccines. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 04/16/24. Further review of the record revealed it did not include documentation regarding receipt or refusal of the pneumococcal or influenza vaccines. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with dignity and respect. This affected two (#17 and #33) residents of the five residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 52. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, schizophrenia, candidiasis, cerebral infarction, and overactive bladder. Review of the plan of care dated 05/06/24, revealed Resident #33 had an indwelling catheter related to obstructive and reflux uropathy. Interventions included change catheter bag as needed, document urine output, observe catheter for any kinks, and staff to provide catheter care every shift. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #33 had Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Observation of Resident #33 in his bed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's weight loss. This affected one (Resident #40) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/13/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, emphysema, hypertensive heart disease, hyperlipidemia, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and spinal stenosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #40 dated 06/20/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition, weighed 151 pounds, and had experienced a significant weight loss. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed the following weights: 179.6 pounds on 12/04/23, 167.7 pounds on 02/01/24, 172 pounds on 03/06/24, 164.2 pounds on 04/01/24, 151.4 pounds on 06/07/24. Resident #40 experienced a weight loss of 15.7 percent (%) in six-month period and an 11.9 % weight loss in a three month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and Guardian interview, observations, review of emergency room (ER) records, review of witness statements, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI's) and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two (#29 and #43) of the ten residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders old myocardial infarction, seizure disorder, Bechet's disease, generalized anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder and major depression. Review of 2018 court documents titled Appointment of Guardian for Incompetent Person revealed Resident #29 was identified by the [NAME] County Probate Court as being incompetent of person and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident interview, staff interviews, review of witness statements and policy review, the facility failed to timely implement their abuse policy during allegations of staff-to-resident verbal abuse. This affected one (#18) of the 10 residents sampled for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, unspecified anxiety disorder, uncomplicated opioid dependence and marijuana abuse, and unspecified Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact, had verbal behaviors, did not wander, and occasionally rejected care. Review of a witness statement dated 07/17/24 and authored by State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #360, revealed she went into Resident #18's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, observation, review of witness statements, review of the facility policy, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse. This affected one (#29) of the ten residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders old myocardial infarction, seizure disorder, Bechet's disease, generalized anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder and major depression. Review of 2018 court documents titled Appointment of Guardian for Incompetent Person revealed Resident #29 was identified by the [NAME] County Probate Court as being incompetent of person and had a court appointed Guardian. Review of a behavior note for Resident #29 dated 03/08/24 at 2:30 A.M. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the medical record, and policy review, the facility failed to hold quarterly care conferences with residents and/or resident's representatives. This affected three (#29, #49 and #51) of the three residents sampled for care conferences. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #29 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. D diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders old myocardial infarction (heart attack), seizure disorder, Bechet's disease, generalized anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder and major depression. Review of 2018 court documents titled Appointment of Guardian for Incompetent Person revealed Resident #29 was identified by the [NAME] County Probate Court as being incompetent of person and had a court appointed Guardian. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide services to maintain resident vision. This affected one (Resident #46) of eight residents sampled for vision services. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, unspecified visual loss, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician orders for Resident #46 revealed an order dated 03/21/24 for the resident to be referred to an ophthalmologist for decreased vision. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #46 dated 04/09/2024 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, had highly impaired vision, and had no corrective lenses. Review of care plan for Resident #46 dated 06/06/2024 revealed the resident had an alteration in visual function related to low vision abilities. Interventions included to obtain eye exam consultations to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary supplements were administered per the physician's order. This affected one (#106) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 06/02/24. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return. Diagnoses included acute gastroenteritis and colitis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, adult failure to thrive, colon cancer, diabetes mellitus, emphysema, mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 had adequate short and long-term memory. The resident required supervision or touching assistance for eating, weighed 103 pounds, had no known significant weight changes, and received a mechanically altered diet. Review of the physician orders for Resident #106 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected one (#39) of four residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 08/24/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), constipation, insomnia, hypertension, pain, emphysema, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, polycythemia vera, alcohol dependence with withdrawal delirium. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had intact cognition. The resident did not display behaviors during the assessment period. Review of the physician orders for Resident #39 dated 10/23/23 revealed the resident was ordered to receive Celebrex 100 milligrams (mgs) two times a day for pain. Physician orders dated 10/24/23, revealed Aspirin 81 mgs daily for prevention, folic acid 1 mg daily for supplement, omeprazole…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain radiology services per physician's order. This affected one (Resident #107) of one reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #107 revealed an admission date of 06/17/24 with diagnoses including humerus fracture, major depressive disorder, low back pain, chronic bronchitis, suicidal ideations, nicotine dependence, age-related osteoporosis, and hypocalcemia and a discharge date of 07/11/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #107 dated 06/25/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for transfers. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107's last bowel movement was a medium, formed stool on 07/04/24. Review of a progress note for Resident #107 dated 07/08/24 timed at 9:56 P.M. revealed the resident complained of lower abdominal pain and stated he had not had a bowel movement in five days. The physician was notified and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received follow up care to dental visits. This affected two (Residents #46 and #49) of three residents sampled for dental care. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, unspecified visual loss, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of care plan for Resident #46 dated 10/02/2023 revealed the resident was at risk for oral /dental problems related to having natural teeth. Interventions included the following: administer medications as ordered, assist with lip balm for dry/cracked lips, arrange for dental care/transportation as needed, observe/report dental abnormalities, assist with oral care as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #46 dated 04/09/2024 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records adequately reflected resident status. This affected one (Resident #107) of one resident reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #107 revealed an admission date of 06/17/24 with diagnoses including right humerus fracture, major depressive disorder, low back pain, chronic bronchitis, suicidal ideations, nicotine dependence, age-related osteoporosis, and hypocalcemia and a discharge date of 07/11/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #107 dated 06/25/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial/moderate staff assistance for transfers. Observation on 07/15/24 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Resident #107 was not in his room and was unable to be located by the Surveyor. Review of the medical record for Resident #107 revealed it did not include documentation of resident's location.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had functioning call lights. This affect three (Residents #2, #47, #53) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/25/23 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, and delusional disorder. Review of care plan for Resident #2 dated 05/06/24 revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and interventions included keeping the call light within reach. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 05/16/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with light touch assistance for transfers, bathing, meals, personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care. Observation on 07/08/24 at 10:05 A.M. through 10:35 A.M. revealed Resident #2 was in bed and the call light was sounding. There was no call light cord in the resident's room for the resident to summon assistance and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, clean, and homelike environment by not ensuring comfortable air temperatures on 100 Hall. This had the potential to affect 11 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10 and #11) residents residing on the 100 Hall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pervasive odors on 500 Hall. This had the potential to affect 10 (#46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, and #55) residents residing on the 500 Hall. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/24 at 8:26 A.M. of 500 Hall revealed the pervasive urine odor. Observation on 06/04/24 at 1:21 P.M. revealed the air temperature on 100 Hall to feel very warm. The observation revealed multiple residents walking in the hallways and into rooms on the unit. None of the residents observed appeared to be in any distress. The observation revealed one portable air conditioning unit which was pumping cool air on to the unit. Observation with interview on 06/04/24 at 1:24 P.M. with Maintenance #201 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within a resident's reach. This affected one (#47) out of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #47 had moderately impaired cognition and required substantial staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility. The MDS also noted Resident #47 had highly impaired vision. Observation and interview on 06/04/24 at 10:34 A.M. of Resident #47 revealed the call light was resting on the headboard of Resident #47's bed and was not within her reach or line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed implement their smoking policy to ensure a resident who smokes was assessed upon admission. Additionally, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure resident's smoking materials were properly secured per the facility smoking policy. This affected two (#51 and #46) out of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/14/24 with medical diagnoses of paraplegia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, chronic hepatitis C, schizoaffective disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #51 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, requires substantial staff assistance for bathing and moderate staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected two (#23 and #47) residents out of the three residents reviewed for medications administered as ordered. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/24/21 with medical diagnoses of COPD, hypertension (HTN), convulsions, anxiety, liver disease, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #23 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting, bed mobility, transfers, and required supervision with showers. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed physician orders dated 10/23/23 for Celebrex 100 milligram (mg) one capsule by mouth two times per day and for Elavil sleep tablet 25 mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime, orders dated 10/24/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's medications were administered as ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 30 opportunities or a 6.66 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (#53) out of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 04/24/17 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction, right sided hemiparesis, paranoid schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #53 had moderate cognitive impairment and was independent with eating, toileting, transfers, and bed mobility and required supervision with bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed a physician order dated 09/22/23 for Gabapentin 300 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth daily,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory work as ordered. This affected one (#65) out of the three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 05/06/22 with medical diagnoses of depression, rhabdomyolysis, severe protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #65 discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/01/24, which indicated Resident #65 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with transfers and bed mobility but required substantial staff assistance for toileting hygiene and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed a physician order dated 04/30/24 for the following blood work to be done: comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning properly. This affected two (#23 and #47) out of the three residents reviewed for call lights not functioning properly. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 10/02/23 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #47 had moderately impaired cognition and required substantial staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility. The MDS also noted Resident #47 had highly impaired vision. Observation and interview on 06/04/24 at 10:34 A.M. of Resident #47 revealed the call light was resting on the headboard of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility. This affected one (#26) out of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 58. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 04/25/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, spinal stenosis, psychosis, and mild neurocognitive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/02/24, indicated Resident #26 had moderate cognitive impairment, had delusions, and had verbal behavioral symptoms towards others. The MDS indicated Resident #26 required set-up assistance with eating, moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and dressing, and maximum staff assistance with bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #26 required supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of medications after a resident was discharged from the facility. This affected one (#60) out of three residents reviewed for medication disposition after discharge from the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 07/10/23 with medical diagnoses of pneumonia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C, and asthma. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/17/23, which indicated Resident #60 was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #60 required extensive staff assistance with eating. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was functioning properly. This affected one (#02) out of the three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 08/03/21 with medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, cirrhosis of the liver, cerebral infarction, and anemia. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/24, which indicated Resident #02 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating, toilet hygiene, transfer, bed mobility, and bathing. Interview and observation on 05/09/24 at 9:10 A.M. with Resident #02 revealed his call light had not worked for a few weeks. Resident #02 was observed to press his call light button. The observation revealed the call light indication box in Resident #02's room signaled the call light turned on, but the call light located outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of Resident Council Meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall shower was in good working condition for resident use. This affected one (#31) out of the residents reviewed for functioning shower and also had the potential to affect nine (#26, #28, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35 and #36) residents who reside on the 200 hallway that utilize the shower room. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the roof did not leak onto the resident hallway on the 500 hall. This had the potential to affect 10 (#55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63 and #64) residents who reside on the 500 hallway where the room was leaking. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observation on 04/11/24 at 7:21 A.M. revealed water was leaking from the ceiling onto the hallway floor, into a large trash can, a small bucket, and onto a large white towel on the 500 Hall. The observation revealed the area of the floor with water was three feet wide by two feet long and there was not a wet floor sign present. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. This affected three (#31, #37, and #42) out of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/20/22 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia, glaucoma in the right eye, and convulsions. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/14/24, which indicated Resident #31 was cognitively intact and was independent with bed mobility, required supervision with toilet hygiene and transfers and moderate staff assistance with bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed physician orders dated 02/04/24 for meclizine 12.5 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth three times per day, carvedilol 3.125 mg one tablet by mouth two times per day, Tylenol extra strength 500 mg two tablet by mouth every eight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the facility failed to ensure portable space heaters were not used in resident accessible areas. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility with the exception of two facility-identified residents (#33 and #44) who did not leave their rooms. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Tour of the facility on 01/10/24 at 7:55 A.M. revealed there were portable electric space heaters observed in the facility hallways and common areas which were accessible to residents. The following space heaters were observed during the tour: one small heater on the 100 hall, one small heater between the 100 and the 200 hall, one large heater on the 200 hall, one large heater on the 300 hall, one small heater in the chapel, one small heater in the dining room, one large heater in the lobby. The surface area of the front of the units where the heat was generated were uncovered and could have potentially caused a burn if touched. Interview on 01/09/24 at 9:10 A.M with Maintenance Director (MD) #26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee personnel record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to test employees for tuberculosis per the facility policy. This affected five (State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #104, STNA #131, STNA #128, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #156, and LPN #162) of five employee personnel records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file for STNA #104 revealed a hire date of 09/27/23. Further review revealed no evidence of STNA #104 having a Mantoux test (a skin test used to screen for tuberculosis) completed. 2. Review of the personnel file for STNA #131 revealed a hire date of 08/14/23. Further review revealed no evidence of STNA #131 having a Mantoux test completed. 3. Review of the personnel file for STNA #128 revealed a hire date of 04/25/23. Further review revealed no evidence of STNA #128 having a Mantoux test completed. 4. Review of the personnel file for LPN #156 revealed a hire date of 06/06/23. Further review revealed no evidence of LPN #156 having a Mantoux…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the Activity Director (AD) job description, and review of the facility activity calendar, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was implemented as scheduled. This affected five (Residents #13, #16, #34, #56, #57) and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility with the exception of the following 29 facility-identified (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #17, #21, #24, #25, #27, #29, #31, #32, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51) who did not participate in activities. The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/07/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), catatonic disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, osteoarthritis (OA), congestive heart failure (CHF), and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of activity calendar, review of personnel files, staff interview, and review of job description, the facility failed to ensure the services of a qualified Activity Director (AD). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility with the exception of the 29 residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #17, #21, #24, #25, #27, #29, #31, #32, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #43, #45, #46, #48, #50, #51) identified by the facility as not participating in activities. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the posted facility activity calendar dated September 2023 revealed there were resident activities scheduled seven days per week. Review of the personnel record for Activities Director (AD) #460 revealed the employee was a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) and had a hire date of 05/24/23. Further review revealed AD #460 had no qualifications to be an AD. Interview on 09/21/23 at 8:59 A.M. with AD #460 confirmed she was hired on 05/24/23 to be the AD for the facility. AD #460 confirmed she developed the activity calendar for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #14) of four residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 09/13/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, emphysema, hypertension (HTN), and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #14 dated 09/20/23 revealed resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance of one staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the admission physician orders for Resident #14 revealed an order dated 09/13/23 for the resident to receive metformin twice daily for treatment of diabetes. Observation of medication administration on 09/25/23 at 8:49 A.M. for Resident #14 per Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #190, revealed metformin was not available in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders to a resident. This affected one (Resident #57) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date 07/21/23. Resident #57 discharged from the facility on 07/22/23. Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #57 did not receive her medication for dates 07/22/23. On 07/22/23, the MAR had an X in all the squares. There were no licensed nurse's signature on the MAR indicating any medications were administered to Resident #57 during her stay at the facility. All medications were due starting on 07/22/23. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility staffing records from 10/24/22 to 10/31/22 revealed the facility did not have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 10/30/22. Interview on 11/03/22 at 3:51 P.M. with the Administrator verified on 10/30/22, the facility did not have RN coverage for eight consecutive hours.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected four (Residents #08, #09, #27, and #40) out of the four residents sampled for care conferences. Facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 10/18/13 with medical diagnoses of left hemiparesis, hypertensive retinopathy, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #08 had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of MDS revealed Resident #08 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a care conference note written by Social Service dated 10/21/22 at 12:00 P.M. The care conference note stated Resident #08's Power-of-Attorney (POA) attended the care conference via phone. Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-07 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain evidence the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee held quarterly Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of QAPI meetings revealed meetings were held in September 2022 and May 2022. There was no documentation or evidence of any additional QAPI meetings taking place during 2022 and 2021. Interview on 11/03/22 at 5:45 P.M. the Administrator verified there was no evidence of any additional QAPI meetings. The Administrator stated she held a QAPI meeting when she started working at the facility in September 2022, and was unable to locate any additional QAPI information (with the exception of May 2022), in the available records. The Administrator affirmed QAPI meetings should be held at least quarterly. Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) Plan, undated, revealed QAPI meetings will be held at least quarterly and a record of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dining room was available for accommodate resident preferences. This affected two (Residents #09 and #40) of three residents reviewed for accommodations of needs. The facility's census was 48. Findings include: Interview on 10/31/22 at 12:30 P.M. with Resident #09 revealed the facility did not enough staff to serve meals in the dining room. Interview on 10/31/22 at 12:45 P.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #170 revealed the facility removed an aide from the overall schedule, so there was no staff available to assist with the dining room. Observation with interview on 10/31/22 at 2:09 P.M. of Resident #09 revealed the resident was eating his meal in his room. Resident #09 stated the dining room was open about one month ago and he liked to socialize in the dining room. Resident #09 stated he was informed the dining room was closed due to not having enough staff to watch the residents in the dining room. Interview on 10/31/22 at 1:59 P.M. with Resident #40 stated she was told the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and family interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative and resident's physician when resident had a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #35) of the three residents reviewed for notifications. The facility's census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 01/08/14. His diagnoses included, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), aphasia, dysphagia, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively impaired. Resident #35 was totally dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the progress note dated 09/21/22 revealed Resident #35 had a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss) to his right heel. There was no documentation the resident's representative or physician was notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency. This impacted one (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #26 revealed and admission date of 07/21/17. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, unspecified intellectual disabilities (ID), major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, high risk bisexual behavior, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as exhibiting hallucinations and delusions during the assessment period. Review of a nursing progress note dated 09/08/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or resident's representative were notified of the facility's bed hold policy upon being transferred to the hospital. This impacted one (Resident #26) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #26 revealed and admission date of 07/21/17. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The resident transferred to the hospital again on 10/14/22 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, unspecified intellectual disabilities (ID), major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as exhibiting hallucinations and delusions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0, the facility failed to develop a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) when indicated. This affected three (Residents #1, #34, and #35) of three residents reviewed for MDS completion. The facility census was 48. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #01 revealed and admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, terminal encephalopathy, cerebral vascular attack (CVA/stroke), and seizure disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #01 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required total care for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and eating. Further review of MDS assessments revealed no significant change MDS was noted when resident was admitted with hospice services. Review of the physician orders dated 09/23/20 for Resident #01 revealed an order for Hospice services. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed following a psychiatric hospitalization. This affected two (Residents #26 and #34) of five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #26 revealed and admission date of 07/21/17. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, unspecified intellectual disabilities (ID), major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as exhibiting hallucinations and delusions during the assessment period. The resident was assessed has rejecting care daily during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to provide therapeutic activities to meet the needs and preferences of the resident population. This affected two (Residents #09 and #40) out of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 04/22/22. His diagnoses included, transient cerebral ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, essential primary hypertension, diabetes mellitus 2, major depressive disorder, hypoglycemia, hepatitis-C, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) assessment dated , 07/30/22, revealed resident had mildly impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #09 required limited assistance or supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 10/31/22 at 12:27 P.M. with Resident #09 revealed he only attended bingo because there was not much to do. 2 Record review for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement physician orders following a pharmacy medication review. This affected one (Resident #31) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 09/26/13. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, nicotine dependence, personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), bipolar disorder, disorganized schizophrenia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), insomnia, pseudobulbar affect, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as exhibiting physical and verbal behaviors directed towards others, other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others, and rejection of care one to three days during the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete laboratory (lab) orders per pharmacy recommendations and physician's orders. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for lab orders. The facility's census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 10/18/13 with medical diagnoses of left hemiparesis, hypertensive retinopathy, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, unspecified convulsions, epilepsy, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #8 was dependent upon staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and bathing and the resident did not ambulate. Review of Resident #8's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/20/22 for Divalproex Sodium (generic form of Depakote) (mood stabilizer/seizures) tablet 500 milligram (mg) by mouth two times per day and an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected two (Residents #46 and #35) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/31/22 at 10:32 A.M. revealed the wall directly next to Resident #46's bed, which was positioned against the wall, had approximately 10 brown, raised spots of an unidentified substance on the wall, measuring approximately dime to half-dollar size. Further observation revealed the ceiling above the window had a large area, measuring approximately two feet by one foot, with peeling paint, four clusters of black spots, and a grey fibrous material. Interview on 10/31/22 at 10:35 A.M., with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #135 verified the spots on Resident #46's wall. STNA #135 stated she had not noticed the spots on the wall the last time she worked, three days prior. STNA #135 further verified the condition of the ceiling and stated she thought it was related to something leaking. STNA #135 stated the ceiling had been like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility kitchen was clean and food items were being properly stored. This affected 60 out of 61 residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one (#47) resident who receive nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Tour of dry food storage area on 12/15/19 at 9:22 A.M. with Dietary Manager #459 revealed one bag of chocolate devils cake mix; one bag of powdered sugar; one bag of coffee cake mix; one bag of walnuts and one bag of raisins that was stored in the original plastic packaging. These items were opened and placed into a second plastic storage bag that was undated. Dietary Manager #459 confirmed the observation. 2. Tour of walk in refrigerator on 12/15/19 at 9:49 A.M., with the Dietary Manager #459 revealed an opened 128 ounce tub of banana peppers; a 128 ounce tub of thousand island salad dressing; a 128 ounce tub of teriyaki sauce; a 128 ounce tub of honey mustard salad dressing; a 128 ounce tub of Italian dressing and a 20 ounce bottle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the building and equipment in a clean and homelike manner. This had the potential to affect 14 (#2, #14, #20, #24, #27, #30, #35, #39, #40, #46, #51, #55, #58, #60) residents residing in the 100 hall lock unit and three (#23, #53, and #57) residents residing in the unlocked areas out of 61 total residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 61. Findings include: Initial tour of the facility conducted on 12/15/19 throughout the day revealed Resident #53 was observed with an outlet box cover missing and wires exposed behind her bed; Resident #23 was observed with boxes on the floor next to her bed with personal belongings, and Resident #57 was observed with a broken off dresser drawer and his television was noted hanging to the left wall behind is head. Further observation conducted of the locked 100 hall revealed multiple rooms with chipped paint, broken/empty hand sanitizer canisters,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to securely store medication in locked medication carts. This had the potential to affect 16 (#4, #11, #13, #15, #21, #25, #26, #31, #33, #42, #44, #45, #54, #57, #62, and #63) residents the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation and interview conducted upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 8:18 A.M. revealed the medication cart in the 200/300 hall was observed to be left unlocked and unattended by staff. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #301 arrived back to the cart after several minutes, and verified the cart had been left unlocked and unattended, and locked the cart. Observation and interview conducted on 12/16/19 at 4:18 P.M., while walking down the 300 hall with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a medication cart was observed to be left unlocked and unattended by staff. DON verified the medication cart was left unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly document advanced directives. This affected one (#23) out of 24 advanced directives reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, and need for personal assistance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact with no noted behaviors. Review of Section G- Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, supervision and setup with eating, extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and transfer/walking/locomotion did not occur. Review of the medical record revealed Physician Orders dated [DATE] for Resident #23's code status to be a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility record review, review of Self-Report Incidents (SRI), resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to ensure the staff thoroughly investigated an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected one (#23) out of one reviewed for abuse during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, and need for personal assistance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact with no noted behaviors. Review of Section G- Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, supervision and setup with eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility record review, review of Self-Report Incidents (SRI), resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This affected one (#23) out of one reviewed for abuse during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, and need for personal assistance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact with no noted behaviors. Review of Section G- Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, supervision and setup with eating, extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to develop the required 48 hour care plans for newly admitted residents. This affected three (#23, #35, and #47) of 17 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, multiple sclerosis, and need for personal assistance. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact with no noted behaviors. Review of Section G- Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, supervision and setup with eating, extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and transfer/walking/locomotion did not occur. Further review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to conduct and/or include the appropriate staff in the development of resident care plan and care planning conferences. This affected three (#35, #47 and #57) of 17 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia without behaviors, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bariatric surgery, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and tobacco use. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35's preference for routine and activities noted it was very important to the resident to be able to choose her clothes, care for personal belongings, choose between showers/bath, have snacks between meals, choose bedtime, be around animals, use phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a resident who required assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#57) reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 61. Findings included: Review of medical record of for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/18/17 with diagnosis that include but limited to chronic breathing disorder, high cholesterol, need for personal assistance, repeated falls, depression, borderline personality disorder, impulse disorder, mental disorder, anxiety, high blood pressure, acid reflux disease, and dementia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed impaired cognition. Resident requires extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting with two staff members. Resident requires supervision for eating. Review of plan of care dated 10/10/18 for Resident #57 needs assistance for completion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication record review, observation, staff, family and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs of the residents. This affected three (#14, #24, and #35) out of three residents reviewed for activities during the investigation stage of the annual survey who resided on the locked unit. This facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizophrenia, hepatitis C, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was moderately cognitively impaired, with verbal behaviors occurred one to three days during the lookback period, other behaviors not directed toward others four to six days during the lookback period, and wandering behaviors occurring one to three days during the lookback period. Review of MDS dated [DATE] section F- Preferences for routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded with full visual privacy. This affected two (#14 and #35) of two reviewed for Privacy during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 61. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizophrenia, hepatitis C, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was moderately cognitively impaired, with verbal behaviors occurred one to three days during the lookback period, other behaviors not directed toward others four to six days during the lookback period, and wandering behaviors occurring one to three days during the lookback period. Review of MDS dated [DATE] section F- Preferences for routine and activities revealed it was very important to-choose clothes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$130,712 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $53,716 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
- $76,996 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 54 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-14 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to BAO OPCO HOLDINGS — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAO OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 06/30/2025 |
| SMITHEY, ASHLEY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 06/30/2025 |
| WOMACK, BRYON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 75% | since 06/30/2025 |
| OHIO-TWO PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| RISE SNF MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| BERNER, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2025 |
| DENNY, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/30/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $289K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365364. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.