Ohio Living Westminster-Thurber

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 30.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.44 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.69 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, review of the hospital records, staff, family, and resident interviews, review of a Self- Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #01 went five hours lying on the floor, crying for help, vomiting several times, suffered pain, and did not receive medical attention for approximately five hours. Subsequently, Resident #01 required an emergency transfer to the hospital, an inpatient hospital stay for seven days, and treatment for multiple fractures of the clavicle, medial and lateral left elbow, and left humerus. This affected one (Resident #01) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident #01 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was held and served at safe and appetizing temperatures. This had the potential to affect 32 of 32 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Facility census was 32. Findings include:Observation and interview on 05/05/26 from 11:47 A.M. to 12:10 P.M., with Kitchen Manager #81 revealed the facility was serving a turkey club sandwich (cold), coleslaw (cold), gelatin (cold) and loaded potato soup (hot) for lunch. The temperatures were taken at the time the test tray was made and found the turkey club sandwich had a temperature of 53 degrees. It was placed back in the freezer to cool and a new tray was removed from the freezer to serve and sandwiches held a temperature of 43 to 45 degrees. Kitchen Manager #81 returned the tray to the freezer and reported they needed to cool a bit more prior to service. Majority of the lunch trays for the 400 hall cart were already made and placed on the cart for service and came from the sandwich tray with a holding temperature of 53 degrees. These remained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical record, review of facility investigation, review of witness statements, staff interviews, resident family interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect, when a severely cognitively impaired nonmobile resident, who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLS), was not provided food, drink or assistance with ADLs, including incontinence care for approximately 12 hours. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for potential abuse and neglect. The facility census was 32.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/23/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dementia, malnutrition, muscle weakness, contracture of the right foot, and hypertension. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/08/26, revealed the resident was rarely if ever understood and cognition was unable to be assessed for Resident #12. The assessment indicated Resident #12 was dependent on staff assistance for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical record, review of facility investigation and witness statements, staff interviews, resident family interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the state agency in the required timeframes. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for potential abuse and neglect. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/23/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dementia, malnutrition, muscle weakness, contracture of the right foot, and hypertension. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/08/26, revealed the resident was rarely if ever understood, was severely cognitively impaired and was unable to be assessed for Resident #12. The assessment indicated Resident #12 was dependent on staff assistance for all mobility and transfers and was assessed to in be incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #12's care plan, revised 04/09/26, revealed the resident was noted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility investigation, review of witness statements, review of facility staff training email, review of staff training records, review of facility audits, staff interviews, resident family interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed and corrective action was implemented to correct an incident of neglect, when a severely cognitively impaired nonmobile resident, who was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLS), was not provided food, drink or assistance with ADLs, including incontinence care for approximately 12 hours. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for potential abuse and neglect. The facility census was 32.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/23/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dementia, malnutrition, muscle weakness, contracture of the right foot, and hypertension. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/08/26, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#34) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 32.Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic pain, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) amongst other diagnoses. Further review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was assessed as having severely impaired cognition upon admission.Review of Resident #34's physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone (pain medication) five milligram (mg) tablets, one tablet to be given every eight hours scheduled at 12:00 A.M., 8:00 A.M., and 4:00 P.M. with a start date of 07/02/25 and an end…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate complete medical record for medication administration of narcotics to a resident. This affected one (#34) of three residents reviewed for completeness and accuracy of the medical record. The facility census was 32.Findings include:Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic pain, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) amongst other diagnoses. Further review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was assessed as having severely impaired cognition upon admission.Review of physician orders for Resident #34 revealed an order for a dose of 0.5 milliliters (ml) of morphine liquid concentration at a strength of 100 milligrams (mg)/5 ml to be given each day every shift as needed for pain, with a start…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling techniques when checking food temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/28/25 at 11:35 A.M. revealed [NAME] #36 checked the temperature of the lunch meal including the pork, beef, German potato salad, peas, ground meats, and soup, in that order. Between each food checked, [NAME] #36 wiped the thermometer on a dry rag, which was resting on the steam table counter. Interview on 05/28/25 at 11:39 A.M., [NAME] #36 verified she wiped the thermometer on a dry rag between each food. [NAME] #36 stated she normally used alcohol wipes, but could not locate them when she started checking the temperatures. Interview on 05/28/25 at 11:40 A.M., Chef #57 verified alcohol wipes should have been used to clean the thermometer in between obtaining the temperature of each food. Review of the facility policy titled, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points and Food Safety, dated 2023, revealed staff would be aware of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one staff completed at least 12-hours of education each year. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 29. Findings include Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 revealed they began employment on 04/06/20. Review of the training logs revealed CNA #5 had completed several training's in 10/29/23. Since 10/29/23, the CNA had only completed 6.25 hours of continuing education. The educations included a medicaid waiver education on 06/24/24 for 0.25 hours, understanding dementia on 02/02/25 for one hour, communication on 02/02/25 for one hour, challenging behavior on 02/02/25 for one hour, activity on 02/04/25 for one hour, dining on 02/04/25 for one hour, and personal care on 02/04/25 for one hour. Interview on 05/29/25 at 10:50 A.M. with Human Resources #19 confirmed CNA #5 had not completed 12 hours of education in the previous 19 months. She reported the facility completed education on a rolling calendar from July…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and review of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure adequate behavioral monitoring to evaluate effectiveness and psychotropic medication necessity for Resident #136. This affected one resident (#136) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Review of Resident #136's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/20/25 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture, history of falling, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, and severe dementia with agitation. Review of Resident #136's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/28/25, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for upper and lower body dressing, toileting and showering. She required substantial assistance for changing positions and she was dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual and physical abuse were reported to the State agency within the required timeframe's. This affected one resident (#1) of two reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 29. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 05/06/21. Diagnoses included arthritis, weakness, obesity, depression, and colostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and required substantial/maximum assistance from staff members for toileting assistance. Interview on 05/27/25 at 10:11 A.M. with Resident #1 revealed a concern of staff giving rough care during incontinence care and also a report of sexual abuse. Resident #1 reported Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #200 had, on one occasion, provided rough care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OHIO LIVING COMMUNITIES — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $395K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH