Ohio Living Dorothy Love

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facilities Legionella Program Plan, staff interview and review of information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to implement their water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella and/or other pathogens in their water system. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the facilities Legionella Program Plan revealed hot water tank flushing consisted of flushing the bottom drain valve on hot water tanks for five minutes at full flow. This was to be completed quarterly. An additional intervention was hot water tank inspection which included to inspect, clean, disinfect, and descale. This was to be completed annually. Further review of the Legionella documentation and paperwork provided by the facility revealed there was no documented evidence the hot water tank had been flushed or inspected per the Legionella Program Plan. Interview on 03/19/25 at 11:49 A.M. with Maintenance Technician (MT) #245 revealed he was unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a food thermometer was cleansed/disinfected between checking food temperature on multiple food items to potentially prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect 19 residents (#07, #15, #18, #21, #28, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96, #97, #98, #100, #101, #102, #103, and #104) on the Rehab Hall. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Observation on 03/18/25 at 11:20 A.M. on Rehab Hall revealed [NAME] #239 obtained food temperature prior to serving residents on the rehab hall. The observation revealed [NAME] #239 used two different thermometers to check the temperature of the food in the steam table. [NAME] #239 was observed to take the temperature of a chicken breast in the steam table. [NAME] #239 then proceeded to insert the same thermometer into the zucchini chips without cleansing/disinfecting the thermometer prior to checking the temperature of the zucchini chips. Further observation of [NAME] #239 revealed [NAME] #239 used the second thermometer to check the temperature of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fingernails were trimmed and without debris. This affected one (#20) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/14/21 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, depression, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/24, which indicated Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for all ADL's. The MDS indicated Resident #20 received Hospice services. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an ADL care plan which stated Resident #20 had limited ability to complete ADL's due to impaired cognition related to the history of cerebrovascular accident and Alzheimer's disease. The ADL care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a thorough assessment following a skin tear. This affected one (#94) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #94 revealed admission date of 02/25/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia affecting the left non-dominant hand, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and nausea. The resident remained at the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of a 12, indicating intact cognition. She required substantial assistance with meals, was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #94's physician orders revealed on order for four percent (%) Lidocaine (pain) patch apply to the area of pain. On for 12 hours and off for 12 hours with a start date of 03/04/25. Review of Resident #94's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess a wound to determine if it was a pressure ulcer and to identify a stage of the wound. Additionally, the facility failed to properly wrap a pressure ulcer as instructed. This affected one (#97) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #97 revealed admission date of 03/03/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including lymphedema, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition. The resident remained at the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. She required set up for meals, was dependent with toileting hygiene, and required substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A care plan for lymphedema revealed edema extending into thighs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a transdermal patch was removed by a qualified staff member and as physician ordered. This affected one (#94) of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #94 revealed admission date of 2/25/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including stroke, hemiplegia affecting the left non-dominant hand, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and nausea. The resident remained at the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating intact cognition. She required substantial assistance with meals, dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #94's physician orders revealed on order for four percent (%) Lidocaine (pain) patch apply to the area of pain. On for 12 hours and off for 12 hours with a start date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. This affected one (#97) out of 12 residents review for food concerns. The facility census in the facility was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident # 97 revealed admission date of 03/03/25 with medical diagnoses of lymphedema, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #97 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated Resident #97 was cognitively intact. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #97 required set up for meals, was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, and required substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 03/18/25 at 11:56 A.M. revealed [NAME] #239 obtained temperature of food in the steam table on the Rehab Hall. The temperature of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff, resident and resident representative interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were served diets as physician ordered. This affected one (#97) of two residents reviewed for dietary orders. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #97 revealed admission date of 03/03/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including lymphedema, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, moderate protein calorie malnutrition. The resident remained at the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. She required set up for meals, was dependent for toileting hygiene, and required substantial assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A care plan for dysphasia revealed she required and altered diet texture. Interventions revealed she required a mechanically altered diet, thin liquids with extra gravy of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided in writing to residents and their representatives when residents were transferred to the hospital. This affected two residents (#53 and #61) of two reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 81. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/03/22. Diagnoses included type II diabetes. Review of Resident #53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Resident #53 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #53 was totally dependent on staff for transfers and toilet use. Review of the facility's Hospital Transfer Log revealed Resident #53 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #53's Census information revealed Resident #53 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of care card, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with communication limitations, had devices and/or communication tools or techniques implemented to ensure effective resident to staff communication. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to her glasses. This affected two residents (#17 and #38) of three residents reviewed for communication devices. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/11/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, history of larynx cancer, tracheostomy, presence of artificial larynx, and aphonia (loss of ability to speak). Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #17 required extensive assistance with dressing, toilet use,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OHIO LIVING COMMUNITIES — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $471K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH