Ohio Living Swan Creek

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 31.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced an unwitnessed fall with injury was provided timely treatment including notifying the physician of complaints of pain, inability to fully move extended leg and obtaining an x-ray. Actual harm occurred on 05/31/25, when Resident #30 experienced an unwitnessed fall from the bed with an injury. Following the incident, the resident continually complained of pain in his hip and had limited mobility with his leg. The facility did not obtain an x-ray of the hip until nine (9) days after the fall. Subsequently, Resident #30 was transferred to the hospital for surgical repair of a broken hip from the fall. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 28.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 02/24/24 and a discharge date of 06/13/25. admission diagnoses for Resident #30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for a nutritional supplement were followed and the physician and dietician were notified regarding a significant weight loss. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #3's ordered nutritional supplement was not available from the supplier for the facility to administer, the facility did not reach out to the physician or the dietician for an alternate supplement or different interventions, and the resident had a significant weight loss of 15.2 pounds/ 8.5 percent weight loss. Additionally, when the significant weight loss occurred the facility failed to notify the physician and dietician of the occurrence. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 28. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/10/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, and Lewy body dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to store and handle food safely. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 32.Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/30/26 at 7:34 A.M. of the main kitchen revealed in the walk-in refrigerator baby carrots stored in a plastic container and chopped celery stored in a plastic container were not labeled or dated, two opened bags of cubed cheese were not dated, and the stand-alone freezer included an opened personal water bottle. Interview on 03/30/26 at 7:45 A.M. with Assistant Dietary Manager #350 verified the carrots, celery, and two opened bags of cubed cheese were not labeled or dated and verified the personal water bottle in the stand-alone freezer. Review of the policy, Food Storage, dated 2023, verified leftover food should be stored in a covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely and clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated and routinely monitored to assure that foods will be consumed by their use by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, pharmacist recommendations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for psychotropic medication effectiveness, side effects and adverse effects. This affected four (#5, #13, #32, and #38) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential to affect 24 residents the facility identified as receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 32.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including heart failure, respiratory disorders, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, depression, unspecified sequalae of cerebral infarction, presence of cardiac pacemaker, shortness of breath, and dysphagia following cerebral infarction. Review of the most current minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #13 had moderately impaired cognition, required staff assistance for all activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of beneficiary protection notifications, and review of CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) guidance, the facility failed to ensure beneficiary protection notification included the estimated cost. This affected three (#11, #43, and #45) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notice. The facility census was 32. Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/02/26. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute on chronic diastolic heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/26, revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact.Review of the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN), signed 012/29/25, revealed Medicare may not pay for skilled services effective 01/01/26. The estimated cost was room and board plus therapy at $5.00 a minute. Resident #11 selected option three to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans reflected each resident's individual needs and conditions. This affected two (#3 and #5) of 17 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 32.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/05/25 with diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, psychosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/10/26, revealed Resident #3 had impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility, had one unstageable (slough and/or eschar) wound and one unstageable deep tissue injury(DTI) (purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer, or cooler than adjacent tissue). Further review revealed no rejection of care occurred during the lookback period.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received adequate oral hygiene. This affected one (#19) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 09/11/24 with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, and heart failure.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 01/09/26, revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognition, and required substantial/maximal assistance for oral hygiene.Review of the care plan, initiated 09/12/24, and revised 03/17/26, revealed Resident #19 will resist care with personal care and medications. Interventions included re-direct and re-approach as needed. Further review revealed Resident #19 required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene and oral hygiene.Observation and interview on 03/30/26 at 10:43 A.M. Revealed Resident #19 sitting in a wheelchair in the common area. Resident #19 appeared groomed. Resident #19 stated the care she received was good. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a delivery invoice, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were implemented timely and failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention devices were in place. This affected one (#3) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 32.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/05/25 with diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, psychosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/10/26, revealed Resident #3 had impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility, had one unstageable ( Pressure ulcer known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar.) wound and one unstageable deep tissue injury (DTI)( Purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the facility's provider. This affected one (#5) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 32.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/01/25 with diagnoses of pain, stroke, hypertension, depression, and insomnia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/30/26, revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and received an antidepressant and an opioid.Review of the current physician order's revealed Resident #5 received Duloxetine (an antidepressant) capsule, delayed release, 60 milligrams (mg)) 1 capsule orally once daily, dated 10/01/25, and Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen - Schedule II tablet (an opioid), 10-325 mg, 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed, dated 10/03/25.Review of a recommendation from the pharmacist to the physician, dated 10/02/25, revealed recommendations to monitor for behaviors with psychotropic use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate antibiotics to treat urinary tract infections. This affected two (#26 and #44) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). The facility census was 32.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/22/25 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, dementia, and urinary tract infection. Review of the comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/26, revealed Resident #26 had intact cognition and was on an antibiotic. Review of the discontinued physician order, dated 01/29/26 through 02/03/26, revealed Resident #26 received Macrobid (nitrofurantoin monohydrate/macrocrystals) (an antibiotic) capsule: 100 milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth twice daily for UTI.Interview on 04/01/26 at 2:14 P.M. with Unit Manager/Infection Preventionist (UM/IP) #317 and concurrent review of Resident #26's laboratory test obtained to diagnose a UTI, results dated 01/29/26, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, family interview, staff interview, rand review of policy, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 28.Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 05/13/25 with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery, unilateral primary osteoarthritis-left hip, unspecified fall, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, hypotension, pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, other specified personal risk factors, presence of left artificial hip joint, stage three chronic kidney disease, colostomy, malignant neoplasm, unspecified vitamin deficiency, anxiety, other specified depressive episodes, overactive bladder, and personal history of irradiation. The resident was discharged on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented timely to address incontinence. This affected one (#11) of four residents reviewed for timely care and treatment in a facility census of 29. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, left humerus fracture, history of fall, rhabdomyolysis, muscle weakness, unspecified kidney injury, urinary tract infection, cerebral infarction, aphasia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living (ADLs), and was incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of a nursing plan of care dated 07/16/25 revealed a focus area to address Resident #11's bladder incontinence related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,873 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,873 — penalty dated 2025-08-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OHIO LIVING COMMUNITIES — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $359K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH