No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sapphire Rehabilitation And Care Center

1605 Northwest Professional Plaza, Columbus, OH 43220 · For profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (614) 451-5677 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$337,273 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (90) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $337,273 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1880 Mackenzie Dr · (614) 224-9052 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1885 Henderson Rd · (614) 451-6555 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1841 Henderson Rd · (614) 326-1999 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4395 Carriage Hill Ln · (614) 583-5300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms49.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 45.9–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.0–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.8–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
78.6%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 96.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

32
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-22)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

90 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 72 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the police reports, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of the website www.accuweather.com, review of the incident/accident log, review of the hospital discharge record, review of the incident report, review of the staff witness statements, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #10), who was assessed at risk for elopement, from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury, and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #10 eloped from the facility and the resident was found by the police 0.5 miles from the facility. Additionally, Resident #10 eloped from the facility a second time on [DATE] and was missing for over 17 hours and was eventually found by the police sitting in the middle of an intersection of a residential street with a speed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of a facility investigation, review of the facility assessment, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process focusing on the safety and total care needs of Resident #23 to ensure the resident was discharged to a safe location with continuity of care post-discharge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury, and/or death beginning on 08/12/25 when Resident #23, who had been admitted to the facility with a known diagnosis of alcohol abuse, was discharged from the facility without evidence the resident had a safe location in which to go. Following the resident's discharge, on 08/13/25 the facility was notified by an unidentified bystander that Resident #23 wanted the facility contacted and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #341 informed the unknown caller Resident #23 would have to go to the emergency room. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews, Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) interview, review of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, review of the tracheostomy handbook, and review of the facilities policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the proper respiratory support was provided to a resident who was experiencing respiratory distress. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or negative health outcomes when Resident #199, who had a tracheostomy (a small surgical opening through the skin and into the windpipe), was not administered respiratory support including suctioning the tracheostomy, administering an as needed breathing treatment which was ordered for shortness of breath, changing the inner cannula of the tracheostomy to ensure its patency or attaching an Ambu (also known as a bag 0 valve-mask resuscitator) to the residents tracheostomy to provide breaths. The lack of providing respiratory support during this emergency resulted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital discharge summaries, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was administered diabetic medication as ordered. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death on [DATE] when Resident #58 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with orders for Lantus (a long-acting insulin) and Humalog (a fast-acting insulin) and Resident #58 was not administered any diabetic medications or insulin on [DATE] or [DATE]. On [DATE] at approximately 11:30 A.M., Resident #58 was sent back to the hospital when Resident #58's blood sugar was checked and showed high. Resident #58's blood sugar was 624 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at the hospital and Resident #58 was treated for hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Resident #58 remained in the hospital until [DATE]. This affected one (Resident #58) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of dental records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #72) was provided dental care in a timely manner. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm and/or medical emergency on 03/30/23 when Resident #72 was re-admitted to the facility from the hospital where Resident #72 had been treated with three antibiotics for sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection) caused by several abscessed teeth. Resident #72 was discharged from the hospital with an order to follow-up with a dentist as soon as possible (ASAP) for tooth extractions. Resident #72 did not receive any follow-up with a dentist and was re-admitted to the hospital on [DATE] due to septic shock (the most severe stage of sepsis) which was most likely due to Resident #72's abscessed teeth. Resident #72 received oral surgery in the hospital to extract the several abscessed teeth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, policy review, review of an Ohio Department of Health (ODH) educational pamphlet, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #107 was adequately supervised while outside and had a way to summon staff assistance. Actual Harm occurred on 08/16/25 when Resident #107, who had been outside in 88 degree Fahrenheit (F) weather, had a change in condition and had a body temperature of 106 degrees F (normal body temperature 98.6 degrees F) and was subsequently hospitalized for heat exhaustion. An additional finding that did not rise to Actual Harm but had the potential for more than minimal harm occurred when the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's fall was thoroughly investigated and accurately documented. This affected two (Residents #107 and #15) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dysphagia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-09-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, police report review, self-reported incident review, policy review, and facility assessment review, the facility failed to identify, address, and obtain appropriate services to meet the behavior health care needs of Resident #5 and failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan to address and support the behavioral health care needs of Resident #5. Actual harm occurred on 08/03/25 when Resident #5, who had diagnoses of anxiety, intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a history of self-injurious behavior of cutting, became agitated with staff during care and brandished a knife and threatened Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #350 that he was going to gut her. The police were contacted and Resident #5 was subsequently removed from the facility and placed in jail after a warrant was issued for his arrest. Prior to the incident, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive and individualized behavioral health interventions were in place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. This resulted in Actual Harm on 05/27/25 for Resident #12 who was admitted to the hospital and treated for facial bruising and a laceration above the left eye with sutures after being punched in the face by another resident. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 109 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 08/03/24 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the care plan for Resident #12, initiated 08/04/24, revealed the resident had a behavior problem related to dementia, which included wandering into other residents' rooms. Interventions included the following: attempt to redirect the resident when showing wandering behaviors, anticipate and meet the resident's needs, staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital medical record review, staff interviews, interview with dialysis center, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a safe discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #99) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 96. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 02/19/26. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle wasting and atrophy, chronic viral hepatitis B, dependence on renal dialysis, and end stage renal disease.Review of the discharge care plan initiated 03/03/26 revealed the resident's plan was to discharge to home with his [daughter]. Resident #99 dialysis's care plan dated 03/03/26 revealed he attended dialysis three times week, Monday, Wednesday and Friday.Review of a hand written care note dated 05/29/26 revealed Resident #99 was discharging home on [DATE]. Resident #99's sister will be in [NAME] at this time (06/03/26)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident use shower rooms in a clean, sanitary, and safe condition. This is affected three of three showers rooms located in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who utilize the shower rooms. The facility census was 94.Findings include:Interview on 06/09/26 at 10:50 A.M. with Resident #60 revealed concerns regarding the condition of the shower rooms. The resident stated a shower room was not being cleaned and reported concerns regarding the condition of the facility's shower areas on both unit A and B.Interview on 06/09/26 at 10:59 A.M. with Unit Manager #211 revealed the Unit B shower remained in use and was cleaned regularly. Unit Manager #211 stated the shower on Unit B had contained missing tile since she began working on the unit approximately one month earlier.Observation on 06/09/26 at 11:07 A.M. of the Unit B shower room revealed missing wall tiles, warped flooring causing tiles to bulge upward, and separation of wall material beneath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facilities Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) and investigations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations into allegations of physical abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were thoroughly investigated. This affected three of three SRIs reviewed. This affected five resident, Residents #40, #41, #43, #74, and #76. The facility census was 94.Findings include:1. Review of SRI tracking number 274596 dated 05/15/26 revealed an allegation of neglect involving facility staff member, Registered Nurse (RN) #166 and Residents #74 and #41. The narrative summary stated that head-to-toe assessments were completed with no injuries noted, staff and resident interviews were conducted, the alleged perpetrator was interviewed, and the allegation was unsubstantiated. On 06/09/26 at 8:33 A.M., 11:50 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 4:10 P.M., the State Survey Agency surveyor requested the facilities SRI 274596 and the facilities investigation related to this SRI to the Administrator. The SRI investigation was not provided until 4:56 P.M.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly provide bathing/shower services and oversite for residents that were dependent on staff for care. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for bathing/showering. The census was 96.Findings Include:Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were depression, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, dementia, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, and non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/04/26, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #27 MDS Assessment, section GG, dated 04/04/26, revealed she required substantial physical assistance with her baths/showers.Review of Resident #27 care plans, dated 05/07/26, revealed she did not have a care plan related to refusal of baths/showers until it was brought to the attention of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control during medication administration. This affected two (Resident #62 and #64) of three residents observed during medication administration. The census was 98. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #62 medical record revealed an admission date of 02/20/22. Medical diagnoses include anxiety, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, essential (primary) hypertension and radiculopathy.Review of Resident #62 Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 03/27/26 revealed resident was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #62 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed orders for the following medications for the morning observed morning medication administration pass; Furosemide tab 20 mg 1 tab one, Gabapentin cap 300 mg 2 capsules, Spironolactone tab 25 mg 1 tab, 1Baclofen tab 20 mg 1 tab, take with 10mg, Baclofen tab 10 mg 1 tab- take with 20mg, Bethanechol chloride tablet 10 mg 1 tab, Buspirone tab 5 mg 1 tab, Fluoxetine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccination as requested by Resident #59. This affected one out of three residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of Resident # 59's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to asthma, malnutrition and vertigo. Review of Resident # 59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview in Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. The resident required assistance from staff with transfers and personal hygiene.Review of Resident immunization history revealed the resident had received a total of four SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 vaccinations, with the last being administered on 10/29/24. Review of Resident #59's progress note with effective date 12/30/25 at 2:00P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPNUM) # 400 revealed the resident requested a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's 30-day discharge notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for discharge notices. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact, independent with eating, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene.Review of Resident #11's 30-day discharge notice dated 12/29/25 revealed the effective date of discharge was 01/28/26 and it was signed by the Administrator. There was no evidence the Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of Resident #11's discharge notice. Interview on 01/28/26 at 1:27 P.M. with Resident #11 revealed she received a letter stating they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, sample of a test tray, and review of Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 108 residents that received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 108.Interview on 12/09/25 at 2:00 P.M. with Resident #44 revealed that the food is never served hot.Interview on 12/09/25 at 2:15 P.M. with Resident #18 revealed the food is never hot. Interviews on 12/10/25 at 1:17 P.M. with Residents #33 and #78 revealed the food is always cold.Observation on 12/09/25 from 11:30 A.M. to 12:51 P.M. of the lunch meal service revealed food was above 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on the tray line. A food cart left the pantry at 12:51 P.M. and arrived at the unit within a minute. Staff started to serve residents their food trays immediately with the last tray on the food cart was delivered to a resident on 12/09/25 at 12:54 P.M.The Dietary Manager (DM) #24, using a facility thermometer, checked the temperature of the food on the test tray. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 108 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility census was 108.Observation on 12/09/25 at 10:31 A.M. of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #24 revealed about 15 ceiling tiles covered with a black dusty substance and a thick layer of dust on the ceiling vents covering food preparation and cook areas. Interview on 12/09/25 at 10:35 A.M. with the Dietary Manager #24 revealed the black stuff would not come off, stating they have tried everything, including a microfiber cloth. Dietary Manager #24 verified the black ceiling tiles and the dust on the ceiling vents and stated they do need cleaned or replaced. Dietary Manager #24 stated there is not a set cleaning schedule for the ceiling or vents. Review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment stated residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure resident call systems were functioning in an appropriate manner. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for call lights, with the potential to affect off residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 108.Review of the medical record for Resident # 16, revealed an admission date of 02/20/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #16's care plan revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to dementia, heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, depression, chronic kidney disease, weakness and cancer. Interview on 12/08/25 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #16 revealed she has attempted to use her call on various occasions, and the staff do not answer. Resident #16 could not recall a date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 72 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of maintenance repair logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment regarding temperature, sanitation and condition of residents rooms. This affected 10 (#8, #16, #21, #26, #79, #83, #87, #96, #97, and #108) of 10 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 108. 1. Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:30 A.M. of Resident #83 and Residents #96's room revealed a hole exposing the drywall. 2. Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:36 A.M. of Resident #26 and# 87's room revealed exposed wires hanging from the wall.3. Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:39 A.M. of Resident #21 and #97's room revealed dried feces on the floor and wall and privacy curtain with brown stains and dried feces.4. Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:59 A.M. of Resident #79 and #108's room revealed privacy curtain with brown stains.5. Observation on 12/08/25 at 10:00 A.M. of Resident #16 and #08's room revealed Resident #16 with gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted and supervised with activities of daily living (ADL), and the facility failed to further ensure the necessary supplies were readily available to staff to ensure residents received timely ADL care. This affected three (#33, #78 and #87) residents received for activities of daily living. The facility census was 108. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/17/25, diagnoses including unspecified dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, chronic pain, and difficulty in walking.Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact, required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene, and bed mobility, partial/moderate assistance for shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure outdoor lighting was maintained and failed to ensure the proper storage of hazardous maintenance equipment and supplies. This had the potential to effect 14 residents with orders for unsupervised leave of absence (#2, #9, #10, #15, #23, #31, #44, #60, #67, #69, #83, #96, #104, and #107) and seven Residents (#21, #28, #62, #65, #94, #97, and #102) who were identified as cognitively impaired but independently mobile. Facility census was 108. 1. Observation on 12/09/25 at 6:30 P.M. revealed a dark night sky and no functioning lights to the right side or around the back of the building, and no functioning lights in the employee parking lot. Only two of six lights were working in the middle grassy and visitor parking area. The two lights that were working only had one of the three bulbs illuminated. Observation and interview on 12/10/25 at 8:35 A.M. with MD #133 confirmed all but two of the front lights were not functioning properly and further confirmed that not having exterior lights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accommodate a resident preference to have an electronic monitoring device (camera) placed in the resident's room. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs/preferences. The facility census was 108. Review of the medical record for Resident # 16, revealed an admission date of 02/20/20. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #16's care plan revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to dementia, heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, depression, chronic kidney disease, weakness and cancer. Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:30 A.M. of Resident #16's room revealed no electronic monitoring device (camera). Interview on 12/10/25 at 9:19 A.M. with Social Service Designee #135 revealed there was a request from the family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents had privacy when communicating on the phone. This affected one (#35) of three residents reviewed for communication with privacy. Facility census was 108. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/06/22. Diagnoses included anxiety, dysphagia, muscle wasting, vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and revealed the resident was rarely if ever understood.Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed she had a guardian and a family member (son) involved with her care. Observation on 12/10/25 at 2:16 P.M. of the Resident #35's room revealed a corded phone on the nightstand, but not plugged into the wall for service. Resident #35 was unable to be interviewed due to cognitive status. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than five percent. There were three medication errors out of 30 opportunities, resulting in a 10 percent medication error rate. This affected one (#58) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration.Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date 08/22/24 ad diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension.Observation on 12/09/25 at 9:49 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #189 completing medication administration for Resident #58 revealed a physician's order dated 08/23/24 for Mucinex 600 milligrams (mg), one tablet twice daily was not administered per order due to not having any supply on hand. A physician's order dated 04/02/25 for Fluticasone Propionate (treats allergies) nasal spray, two sprays in both nostrils was not administered per order due to not having any supply on hand. A physician's order dated 08/24//24 for glipizide (diabetic medication) 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored. This affected one (#79) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 108.Review of the medical record for Resident #79, revealed an admission date of 11/11/16. Diagnoses included: vascular dementia, cerebral infarction, and hypertension.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #79 required minimal assistance with activities of daily living and ambulates independently.Observation on 12/08/25 at 9:50 A.M. revealed Resident #79's had several medications in a medicine cup sitting on his bedside table. Resident #79 stated he does not know how long they have been there, adding the nurses often leave his medications on the bedside table for him to take.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #79 did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of staff time punches, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing in the kitchen to maintain a clean kitchen and to serve residents on appropriate dishware. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility who consumed food by mouth from the facility kitchen. Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/25/25 from 9:10 A.M. to 9:28 A.M. revealed the following concerns in the kitchen:a. The wall behind the handwashing sink was covered in food splatter.b. Boxes of food were on the floor, not six inches off the ground. There were 11 boxes piled up in the freezer, over 13 boxes piled up in the walk-in refrigerator, and 17 boxes in dry storage.c. Shelves on all food prep tables, the shelf in the dishwashing area, and the table that had a griddle on it, had a large buildup of food debris and stains. d. The ice machine had a black or gray build up in the back.e. Nine ceiling tiles surrounding a vent were covered in a thick black dust, this went down the wall, which was peeling.f. There were two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and serve beverages in clean cups for the B Unit. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents who consumed food from the kitchen and the 47 residents residing on the B unit (#4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #14, #17, #19, #22, #24, #26, #28, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #47, #54, #59, #61, #65, #70, #75, #76, #80, #81, #85, #86, #87, #89, #93, #96, #98, #99, #101, #102, #103, #105, #106, #107). The facility identified all residents received meals/beverages from the kitchen.Findings include:1.Observation on 08/25/25 from 9:10 A.M. to 9:28 A.M. revealed the following concerns in the kitchen:a. The wall behind the handwashing sink was covered in food splatter.b. Boxes of food were on the floor, not six inches off the ground. There were 11 boxes piled up in the freezer, over 13 boxes piled up in the walk-in refrigerator, and 17 boxes in dry storage.c. Shelves on all food prep tables, the shelf in the dishwashing area, and the table that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen trash cans were appropriately contained. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Observation on 09/03/25 at 8:30 A.M. and 11:14 A.M. revealed two large, approximately 20 gallon, trash containers filled with trash. One container was near the handwashing station, and the other one was near the dishwashing area. Both containers were filled with trash and open with no lids or coverings on them. Interview on 09/03/25 at 11:20 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #269 confirmed that the two containers were uncovered and needed lids or covering. DM #269 obtained lids for the trash containers at time of discovery. Review of the policy Sanitization dated October 2008, revealed kitchen wastes that are not disposed of by mechanical means shall be kept in clean, leakproof, nonabsorbent, tightly closed containers and shall be disposed of daily.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of the surety bond, and review of facility resident financial account balances, the facility failed to ensure that their surety bond was sufficient to cover the highest resident daily funds balance. This had the potential to affect 45 resident accounts that were managed by the facility. The facility census was 96.Findings include:Review of the facility surety bond dated 12/27/24 revealed that the facility had a surety bond in the amount of $50,000.00 dollars.Review of the facility's Resident Fund Management Service (RFMS) resident balance sheet, dated 09/03/25, revealed that the total current balance of all resident accounts was $59,786.08 which was $9,786.08 higher than the surety bond amount.Interview on 09/03/25 at 4:10 P.M. with Regional Business Office Manager (RBOM) #267 confirmed that the amount of the surety bond was not enough to cover the 09/03/25 current resident funds balance.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were filled out accurately and timely. This affected four residents (#4, #10, #19 and #64) of 40 sampled for the annual survey. The facility census was 96.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #10 's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/18/25 and diagnoses including, but were not limited to, diabetes, dementia, major depressive, hypertension, asthma, and other sequelae of cerebral infarction Review of resident #10's physicians orders revealed an order dated 04/19/25 for aspirin 81 milligrams daily by mouth. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/11/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed because the resident was rarely/never understood. The resident required set-up assistance for eating, was independent for bed mobility, and required supervision for transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have comprehensive care plans were in place for Residents #5, #14, and #23. This affected three residents (#5, #14, and #23) out of 40 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical review revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mood disorder, anxiety disorder, history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and paraplegia. Review of hospital record dated 07/22/25 revealed an inpatient consult to behavioral health on 07/20/25 for Resident #5. Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old male with a known intellectual disability and TBI (2019), paraplegia, with chronic pain syndrome. Behavioral health services were consulted to evaluate episodes of agitation and labile encounters with staff. Resident #5 had a history of depression and anxiety which were thought to be related to his TBI. This was complicated by poor frustration tolerance and maladaptive (inappropriate) coping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #38 and #93 received medications timely and as ordered, failed to ensure Resident #15's laceration was monitored, and failed to apply Resident #11's ace wraps per physician orders. This affected four residents (#11, #15, #38, and #93) out of 40 residents sampled for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 96. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/25 with diagnoses including migraine, mild-protein calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, open angle glaucoma bilateral and severe, and retinal neovascularization of the right eye. Review of Resident #38's plan of care dated 09/18/23 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired comfort related to chronic arthritis, wedge compression fracture, chronic pain, and migraines. Interventions included administering pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated and expired medication was discarded. This affected five (Resident #2, #50, #55, #57, and #116) residents but had the potential to affect newly admitted residents. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1.An observation on [DATE] at 11:49 A.M. revealed two Glargine (long-acting insulin) pens were open and undated for Resident #57. Registered Nurse (RN) #850 verified the insulin pens for Resident #57 were open and undated. 2.An observation on [DATE] at 11:56 A.M. revealed two vials of Admelog (fast acting insulin) were opened and undated for Resident #2. 3.Aspart (fast acting insulin) was open and undated for Resident #50. Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. 4.Lispro (fast acting insulin) and Glargine were open and undated for Resident #55 that was discharged on [DATE]. An unopened box of Cathflo (alfeplase) for Resident #55 was in the medication cart. The Cathflo for Resident #55 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the floor and air conditioning units were maintained on the B unit, failed to ensure the floor in Resident #4's room was clean, and failed to ensure the floor and walls of Resident #103 room were clean. This had the potential to affect 47 residents residing on the B unit (#4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #14, #17, #19, #22, #24, #26, #28, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #47, #54, #59, #61, #65, #70, #75, #76, #80, #81, #85, #86, #87, #89, #93, #96, #98, #99, #101, #102, #103, #105, #106, and #107). The facility census was 96.Findings include: Observation on 08/25/25 at 11:01 A.M. and 4:09 P.M. of Resident #4's room revealed the floor around her tube feeding had brown splatters. The hallway floor on the B unit was observed to have a black, sticky residue throughout the hallway. Observation on 09/04/25 at 10:00 A.M. and 1:20 P.M. revealed Resident #4 had brown splatters on her floor around her tube feeding pole and had black sticky appearing residue under her wheelchair, which was in the same spot as 08/25/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to honor Resident #57's and Resident #68's bathing preferences and failed to ensure Resident #12's call light was within reach. This affected three residents (#12, #57, and #68) out of six residents reviewed for accommodations of needs and preferences. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type one diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. A care plan dated 08/13/25 and revised on 08/28/25 revealed Resident #57 had a self-care performance deficit related to activities of daily living (ADL) abilities. Interventions included one to two persons to assist with bathing, and two persons to assist with transfers. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident privacy during a routine dressing change. This affected one resident (#25) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/21 and diagnoses including but not limited to major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, constipation, vitamin d deficiency, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #25's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was unable to be completed for Resident #25 because the resident was rarely/never understood. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #25 required supervision for eating, substantial/maximal assistance for bathing, bed mobility, and transfers and was dependent for toileting hygiene, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had a stage two pressure area. An observation on 09/02/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility self-reported incidents, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #107's injury of unknown origin and an altercation between Resident #5 and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) were reported to the State Agency in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#107) of seven reviewed for accidents and one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, epilepsy, contracture of left foot and hand, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Review of Resident #107's occupational evaluation and plan of treatment dated 06/09/25 revealed he had left upper extremity paralysis with contractures. Review of Resident #107's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility self-reported incidents, facility investigation review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #107's injury of unknown origin and an altercation between Resident #5 and a Certified Nursing Assistant CNA) were thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (#107) of seven reviewed for accidents and one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, epilepsy, contracture of left foot and hand, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Review of Resident #107's occupational evaluation and plan of treatment dated 06/09/25 revealed he had left upper extremity paralysis with contractures. Review of Resident #107's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #9 and failed to ensure an accurate PASARR was completed for Resident #23. This affected two residents (#9 and #23) out of six residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], and discharged [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, alcohol abuse, hypertensive heart disease, adult failure to thrive, chronic viral hepatitis C, osteoarthritis, cutaneous abscess of right lower limb, and multiple myeloma. Review of the 5-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) identification screen dated 07/07/25 revealed Resident #23 had no mental disorders or substance use related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) when Resident #15 received a new diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #15) out of six residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed the Hospital Exemption from Preadmission Screening Notification dated 02/06/25 revealed Resident #15 had a mood disorder and paranoia. A disability of blindness was not marked. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified psychosis, blindness, and delirium. A pharmacy recommendation dated 05/27/25 revealed a new diagnosis for Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) was needed. A new diagnosis of delirium due to a known physiological condition was added on 06/06/25. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 08/28/25 was completed due to the Hospital Exemption from Preadmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #62 and failed to provide bathing as scheduled for Resident #68. This affected two (Resident #62 and #68) of nine residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. A care plan dated 08/13/25 revealed Resident #62 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions to check nail length and trim and clean (nails) on bath day and as necessary. An admission Functional abilities and goals form dated 08/14/25 revealed Resident #62 was dependent on staff for bathing. An observation and interview on 08/26/25 at 8:27 A.M. with Resident #62 revealed Resident #62 had long fingernails with a dark substance under the nails. Resident #62 verified he would like his fingernails trimmed and cleaned. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 and #38 were offered activities and had activity plans of care in place. This affected two residents (#11 and #38) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/25 with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, open angle glaucoma bilateral and severe, and retinal neovascularization of the right eye. Review of Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #38's recreational therapy assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had interest in jazz, reading, and watching television and movies. Review of Resident #38's plan of care on 08/25/25 revealed it did not address her activities preferences. Review of Resident #38's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development for Resident #21 and failed to ensure Resident #85's pressure ulcer was treated as ordered. This affected two residents (#21 and #85) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 96. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/29/25 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy, spinal stenosis, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, colostomy status, pressure ulcer of sacral region, heart failure, and anal abscess. Review of the Braden scale for Predicting Pressure ulcer risk for Resident #21, dated 07/29/25, revealed the resident was at moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers. This was related to a very limited sensory perception, very limited mobility, and friction and shearing risk. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of Resident #15's bowel movements and failed to ensure documented evidence of Resident #21's catheter care. This affected two (Residents #15 and #21) out of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis, left side rib and right lower leg fracture, blindness, and delirium. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #15 was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of the bowel documentation revealed Resident #15 did not have documentation of a bowel movement from 08/07/25 until 08/16/25. An interview on 09/03/25 at 9:17 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the facility did not have a bowel protocol, but stated a residents' name would show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documented evidence that Resident #9's ileostomy/urostomy bag was routinely changed. This affected one (Residents #9) out of four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/03/25. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, hypertension, colostomy, and ileostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/24/25, revealed the resident had slightly impaired cognition. It also noted the resident required staff assistance with managing her colostomy and ileostomy, including changing of the bags. Review of Resident #9's physician orders for March 2025 revealed no orders for ensuring the resident's ileostomy or urostomy bag was changed. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed no documented ileostomy or urostomy bag changes from her admission [DATE] until she was hospitalized on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to appropriately supervise and position Resident #107 during meals, and timely implement dietitian recommendations for Resident #4 and #21. This affected three residents (#4, #21, and #107) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 96.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, epilepsy, sickle-cell disease, contracture of left foot and hand, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Review of Resident #107's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. He required substantial to maximal assistance with eating. Review of Resident #107's occupational evaluation and plan of treatment dated 06/09/25 revealed he had left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer a fentanyl patch as ordered for Resident #38 and failed to ensure parameters were in place for Resident #105's pain medications to administer them appropriately. This affected one resident (#105) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications and one resident (#38) of four people reviewed for pain. The facility census was 96.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/25 with diagnoses including migraine, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, open angle glaucoma bilateral and severe, and retinal neovascularization of the right eye. Review of Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, almost constantly had pain that occasionally affected day to day activities and the worst pain over the last five days was an eight out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately document the disposal of fentanyl patches for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/17/25 with diagnoses including migraine, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit, chronic pain syndrome, unspecified dementia, open angle glaucoma bilateral and severe, and retinal neovascularization of the right eye. Review of Resident #38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. almost constantly had pain that occasionally affected day to day activities. The worst pain over the last five days was an eight. Review of Resident #38's plan of care dated 09/18/23 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired comfort related to chronic arthritis, wedge compression fracture, chronic pain, and migraines. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's medication was ordered with the proper diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for appropriate diagnosis for medications. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified psychosis, left side rib and right lower leg fracture, blindness bilateral category 3, delirium, and acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right lower extremity. Review of physician orders revealed from 04/17/25 until 09/03/25 Resident #15 was ordered Clonidine (to treat high blood pressure) 0.1 milligram transdermal patch weekly for deep vein thrombosis. Review of the medication administration record revealed the resident received the medication as ordered. An interview on 09/03/25 at 9:17 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was an incorrect diagnosis for Clonidine and there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent Resident #8 from experiencing a significant medication error when he missed his immunosuppressant medication related to a kidney transplant. This affected one resident (#8) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/06/19 with diagnoses including brief psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, kidney transplant status, unspecified mood disorder, chronic kidney disease stage three, and immunodeficiency. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #8's plan of care, revised 06/08/23, revealed the resident had renal insufficiency related to stage three kidney disease and immunodeficiency due to a kidney transplant. Interventions included monitoring and reporting changes in mental status, monitoring for signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10's physician-ordered laboratory testing was completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of Resident #10 's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/18/25 and diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes, dementia, major depressive, hypertension, asthma, and other sequelae of cerebral infarction Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/11/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed because the resident was rarely/never understood. The resident required set up assistance for eating, was independent for bed mobility, and required supervision for transfers and ambulation. Resident #10's MDS indicated he was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel and was working with physical therapy at the time of the assessment. Review of Resident #10's physicians orders revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place as ordered for Resident #4, failed to appropriately sanitize a blood pressure cuff for the B Hall, and failed to maintain infection control procedures by changing Resident #64's incontinence brief in Residents #71's bed. This affected three residents (#4, #64, and #71) out of 10 residents reviewed for infection control, and had the potential to affect 47 residents residing on the B hall, that utilized the facility blood pressure cuff, at the time of the survey. The facility census was 96.Findings Include:1.Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/24 and diagnoses including, but not limited to, depression, anxiety disorder, Vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, diabetes, and unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/02/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #107's topical antibiotic cream was not provided antibiotic cream past its physician-ordered end date. This affected one resident (#107) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 96.Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, epilepsy, contracture of left foot and hand, and flaccid hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Review of Resident #107's progress note dated 05/29/25 revealed the resident was noted to have several liquid filled blister like areas on the back of his hand. Two of the areas were seeping and two were completely opened. There was a yellowish drainage with a mild odor and the resident had pitting edema to his hand. The physician was notified, and they received orders to send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident, resident family member, and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for one (#13) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included dysphasia, muscle disorder, mobility abnormalities, diabetes with foot ulcer, respiratory failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Interview and observation on 02/26/25 at 1:35 P.M. with Resident #13 and Resident #13's family member revealed the resident's furniture was typically covered in medical supplies, pillows, wound vacuum care supplies, gloves, incontinence briefs, and blankets. Observation of the resident's room during the interview revealed a pile of items was three feet high and taller than the back of the armchair. Resident #13's family stated the resident did not have current orders for a wound vacuum and the resident typically had pillows for off loading, but did not need the six that were piled up.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, resident family, and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with bathing and nail care. This affected three (#13, #21, and #102) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 11/04/24 and discharge date of 01/19/25. Diagnoses included amputation of the right foot, diabetes, muscle disorder, end stage renal disease, epilepsy, and heart failure. Review of the plan of care dated 11/04/24 revealed Resident #102 had a self-care deficit with interventions to assist with bathing and shower as needed, and assist with hygiene, grooming, dressing as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #102 was cognitively intact and required substantial maximum assistance for toileting, bathing, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident, resident family, and staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure physical therapy was provided as ordered. This affected two (#13 and #102) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included dysphasia, muscle disorder, mobility abnormalities, diabetes with a foot ulcer, respiratory failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #13's physician orders dated 11/07/24 to 02/10/25 revealed physical therapy was recommended for skilled treatment five times weekly until 12/11/24. Resident #13 had an order dated 12/06/24 to 02/10/25 for physical therapy recommended for skilled treatment five times weekly until 01/04/25. Further review reveled a third order for 02/19/25 with no end date for a physical therapy recommended for skilled treatment five times weekly. Review of Resident #13's therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of infection control logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 infections were adequately monitored. This affected one (#102) of three reviewed for COVID-19 infections. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #102 revealed an admission date of 11/04/24. Diagnoses included amputation of the right foot, diabetes, muscle disorder, end stage renal disease, epilepsy, and heart failure. The resident was discharged on 01/19/25. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #102 was cognitively intact. Review progress notes dated 01/08/25 revealed Resident #102 was evaluated for a transfer to an assisted living facility, and a COVID-19 test was requested. Resident #102 tested negative and all parties were updated. Review of a subsequent progress note dated 01/10/25 revealed Resident #102's family was concerned about a change in condition and a COVID-19 test was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, guardian interview, record review, policy review, and review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), the facility failed to timely notify the resident representative following a change in condition. This affected one (#69) of three residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 08/16/22. Medical diagnoses included hemiparesis and hemiplegia following cerebrovascular accident (stroke), lack of coordination, and anxiety. Review of Resident #69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 06/05/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #69 had no recorded behaviors or rejection of care. Review of Resident #69's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 07/24/24 at 2:00 P.M., which indicated the resident sustained a wound to her left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, orthopedic follow-up note review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure follow-up appointments were implemented as scheduled and/or ordered. This affected one (Resident #36) of the six residents reviewed for follow-up care. The facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an initial admission date of 02/09/24 and a re-entry date of 05/08/24. Diagnoses included dehiscence of amputation stump, need for assistance with personal care, peripheral vascular disease, and acquired absence of the right leg below the knee. Review of the hospital after visit summary dated 02/09/24 revealed an order for the resident to follow-up with her orthopedic physician in two weeks. Review of Resident #36's scheduled appointments for February 2024 revealed a scheduled follow-up appointment with orthopedic office in two weeks or on February 20 th, 2024 at 12:00 P.M. Review of progress note dated 02/19/24 at 4:53 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, and fall investigation report review, this facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place during mechanical lift transfers to prevent a fall. This affected one (Resident #108) of three residents reviewed for accidents while receiving staff assistance. Facility census was 98. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #108 revealed an initial admission date of 10/20/10 and a re-entry date of 03/06/23. Diagnoses included contracture of the left and right ankle, lack of coordination, muscle spasms, and dependence on enabling machines and devices. Review of Resident #108's Fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 10 indicating a low risk for falls. Review of Resident #108's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene after glove removal and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions during wound care and dressing change. This affected one (Resident #36) of the four residents reviewed for wound care. Facility census was 98. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 02/09/24 and a re-entry date of 05/08/24. Diagnoses included dehiscence of amputated stump, need for assistance with personal care, and absence of right leg below the knee. Review of the care plan dated 02/13/24 revealed Resident #36 has actual impairment to skin integrity of the right below the knee amputation (RBKA) related to a surgical wound. Interventions include to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdowns width, length, depth, type of tissue and exudate and any other notable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, and review of the facility meal schedule, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at the scheduled time. This affected all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Observation on 01/29/24 from 8:44 A.M. to 9:15 A.M. revealed the residents were waiting for breakfast to be served. Observation on 01/29/24 at 9:10 A.M. revealed Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) #305 and Dietary Aide (DA) #202 were preparing scrambled eggs and toast for breakfast. Interview on 01/29/24 at 9:30 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #199 confirmed the cook had called off work on 01/29/24 and no one had notified him of the call off until he arrived at the facility. Observation on 01/29/24 at 9:31 A.M. revealed the dietary staff began delivering breakfast meal trays to the residents. Interviews on 01/29/24 from 10:30 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. with Residents #12, #14, #18 and #20 confirmed breakfast was not served on 01/29/24 until after 9:30 A.M. Residents further confirmed they preferred to receive breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and distributed in a sanitary manner to prevent food borne illnesses. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The census was 102 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation of the kitchen 01/29/24 at 8:44 A.M. revealed the ice machine's shield had a residue of brown and black particles which were observable when staff wiped the shield with a paper towel. Interview on 01/29/24 at 8:44 A.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #202 confirmed the ice machine shield located inside the ice machine had a residue of brown and black particles. 2. Observation on 01/29/24 at 8:46 A.M. revealed the shelf above the prep table contained an undated sealed bag of brown sugar. Interview on 01/29/24 at 8:46 A.M. with Administrator in Training (AIT) #102 confirmed the bag of brown sugar was not dated. 3. Observation on 01/29/24 at 8:48 A.M. revealed the door to the dry storage room was propped open with a plastic gallon container of mayonnaise on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and homelike environment for residents and staff. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 102 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 01/29/24 at 8:02 A.M. of the parking lot revealed there were two garbage dumpsters with eight large clear bags of garbage sitting on the ground. Interview on 01/29/24 at 8:30 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the bags had been sitting there since 01/28/24 and should be placed inside the dumpster. 2. Observation on 01/29/24 at 8:31 A.M. revealed there was a low air mattress, a slender box approximately three feet long and several large boxes sitting out in the lobby of the facility, an area which was accessible to residents. Interview on 01/29/24 at 8:31 A.M. with the DON confirmed the low air loss mattress and boxes were being stored in the lobby and should be stored in an appropriate storage location. 3. Observation on 01/29/24 at 8:33 A.M. revealed there was a geri…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect by knocking on the resident door and waiting to be invited in before entering the room. This affected one (Resident #16) of four residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 16 revealed an admission date of 03/28/22 with diagnoses including alcohol cirrhosis, kidney failure, heart failure, diabetes, and legal blindness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 12/29/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 01/30/24 at 2:45 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #112 entered Resident #16's room without knocking on the door. The Surveyor was interviewing Resident #16 at the time and told STNA #112 they were having a private conversation. STNA #112 did not acknowledge Resident #16 or the Surveyor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, review of facility grievance log, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident complaints and concerns were documented and followed up on in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for follow up on resident concerns. Resident census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/28/22 with diagnoses including alcohol cirrhosis, kidney failure, heart failure, diabetes, and legal blindness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 12/29/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required set up assistance for lower and upper body dressing and shower and bathing required partial or moderate assistance. Interview on 01/29/24 at 2:21 P.M. with Resident #16 confirmed he was legally blind and required assistance with certain activities of daily living (ADLs.) Resident #16 confirmed he had reported many concerns including issues with staff and dietary issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed for allegations of abuse, neglect and misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 16 revealed an admission date of 03/28/22 with diagnoses including alcohol cirrhosis, kidney failure, heart failure, diabetes, and legal blindness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 12/29/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required set up assistance for lower and upper body dressing and shower and bathing require partial or moderate assistance. Review of a progress note for Resident #16 dated 11/29/23 per the Administrator revealed staff reported Resident #16 was being aggressive and using foul language and impeding care of his roommate. Staff had reported resident spoke disrespectfully to them and called them profane names. Staff informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility menu, the facility failed to ensure residents received foods that accommodated resident preferences. This affected two (Residents #16 and #22) of six residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 16 revealed an admission date of 03/28/22 with diagnoses including alcohol cirrhosis, kidney failure, heart failure, diabetes, and legal blindness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16 dated 12/29/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required staff supervision and set up help with eating. Review of the January 2024 physician orders for Resident #16 revealed the resident received a regular diet with regular textures and thin liquids. Review of the breakfast tray ticket for Resident #16 dated 01/30/24 revealed the resident requested toast, four pieces of bacon and two hard boiled eggs for breakfast. Interview on 01/29/24 at 2:21 P.M. with Resident #16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #74) call light was kept within reach. The deficient practice affected one (Resident #74) of 21 residents observed for call lights. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an initial admission date on 04/03/23 and a readmission date on 05/05/23. Medical diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, and history of falling. Review of the Medicare Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/12/23, revealed Resident #74 had impaired cognition and scored an 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #74 required extensive assistance from one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL), except eating. Resident #74 required supervision with set up help only from staff with eating. Resident #74 was totally dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interviews, review of resident council meeting minutes, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure repeated concerns expressed during resident council were adequately addressed. This affected three (Residents #28, #61, and #68) of five residents reviewed for staffing concerns. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, cerebral infarction, type two diabetes. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/12/23, revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #61's diagnoses included paraplegia, congestive heart failure, cerebral infarction, insomnia, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #61's MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals intakes were consistently recorded and monitored as well ensure resident weights were routinely obtained upon admission. This affected one (Resident #87) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to type two diabetes, hypertension, and edema. Review of Resident #87's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/23, revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #87 weights since 05/12/23, revealed the following weights and dates they were taken: 05/13/23 (292 pounds), 05/31/23 (287 pounds), and 06/12/23 (286 pounds). There was no evidence additional weights were obtained for Resident #87. Review of Resident #87's nutritional notes and assessments since 05/12/23, revealed one nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the menu, review of the substituation log, review of the dietary spreadsheet, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve the appropriate dessert according to the menu. The deficient practice affected two (Residents #10 and #29) of three residents who were on a pureed diet in the facility. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/04/21. Resident #10's medical diagnoses included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the order summary report of active physician orders as of 06/22/23 revealed Resident #10 had a diet order for a regular diet, pureed texture, and nectar thick liquids. The order was dated 04/05/23. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date on 01/30/23 and a readmission date on 02/12/23. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diffuse traumatic brain injury, protein-calorie malnutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the pureed green beans recipe, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve palatable pureed green beans. This affected three (Resident #10, #29, and #40) out of three residents who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/04/21. Resident #10's medical diagnoses included dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the order summary report of active physician orders as of 06/22/23 revealed Resident #10 had a diet order for a regular diet, pureed texture, and nectar thick liquids. The order was dated 04/05/23. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 01/30/23 and a readmission date of 02/12/23. Resident #29's medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, diffuse traumatic brain injury, protein-calorie malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the order summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received dessert that was the appropriate texture and consistency. The deficient practice affected one (Resident #40) out of three residents who received a pureed diet. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an initial admission date of 04/19/18 and a readmission date of 05/22/18. Resident #40's medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, dysphagia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the order summary report of active physician orders as of 06/22/23 revealed Resident #40 had a diet order for a regular diet, pureed texture, and thin liquids. The order also stated to feed drinks to Resident #40 with a spoon, provide a divided plate for all meals, and provide one on one for all meals. The order was dated 05/19/21. Observation on 06/20/23 at 12:10 P.M. of Resident #40 during the lunch meal revealed the resident was sitting in a broda chair in the common area, in front of the nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary, and comfortable manner. This affected two (Residents #12 and #50) out of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 06/12/23 at 10:47 A.M. revealed drywall tape and plaster was hanging from the ceiling by the window over the wardrobe in the room shared by Resident #50 and Resident #12. Observation on 06/14/23 at 2:15 P.M. revealed drywall tape and plaster was still hanging from the ceiling by the window over the wardrobe in the room shared by Resident #50 and Resident #12. Observation on 06/20/23 at 3:00 P.M. revealed drywall tape and plaster was still hanging from the ceiling by the window over the wardrobe in the room shared by Resident #50 and Resident #12. Interview on 06/20/23 at 5:00 P.M. with the Administrator verified there was drywall tape and plaster hanging from the ceiling over the wardrobe in Resident #50 and Resident #12's room. The Administrator stated there needed to be a work order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen and ensure food proper food storage. This affected 83 of 87 residents who receive food from the kitchen (Residents #4, #23, #68 and #245 receive nothing by mouth). The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen's bread rack on 02/24/20 at 9:28 A.M. revealed all thawed facility bread was undated as to when it was thawed. Interview with Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) #554 at the time of the observation revealed the dietary staff were supposed to date the bread when they pull it out of the freezer to thaw, and the bread was good for seven days. If is not used within seven days, then it was to be thrown away. The ADM verified the bread was not dated as to when it was thawed. Observation of the range hood over the stove on 02/24/20 at 9:30 A.M. revealed grayish fuzzy substance hanging off the range hood over the stove. Interview with ADM #554 at the time of the observation verified there was grayish fuzzy substance hanging off the range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review, staff interview, interview with the county health department, review of the memorandum from the Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety and Oversight Group and review of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) guidance, the facility failed to develop an adequate water management plan. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper signage was located on the door of a resident on isolation precautions. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated water management plan revealed the facility failed to accurately describe its building water system and failed to follow the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) guidance. The facility's water management plan did not establish control limits and failed to establish response protocols when the control limits were not met. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to promote dignity by not removing a hospital band containing private information from Resident #68's wrist and failed to provide dignity to Resident #6, #28 and #51 by standing over the residents and feeding the residents. This affected four (#6, #28, #51 and #68) of six residents reviewed for dignity. The facility identified nine residents who require feeding assistance. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/19. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/20, revealed the resident was significantly cognitively impaired and required the extensive assistance of one person for dressing and hygiene care needs Review of the progress notes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the code status in the electronic medical record was accurate for Resident #36 and failed to obtain a do not resuscitate (DNR) consent nt for Resident #68. This affected two (#36 and #68) of 25 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance and chronic kidney disease stage three. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/19, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the physician order, dated 01/28/20, revealed a Do Not Resuscitate- Comfort Care (DNR-CC) code status order. (A DNR-CC requires that only comfort measures be provided when a resident's heart stop beating or they stop breathing). Review of the resident's code status consent form, undated, revealed the resident consented to a DNR-CC Arrest code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #68's abnormal lab values. This affected one (#68) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 08/04/19 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/20, revealed the resident was significantly cognitively impaired. Review of the physician order, dated 01/16/20 revealed to have lab Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) preformed each Friday. Review of the hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital for abnormal lab values (Sodium 168) and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for free water replacement and the resident was diagnosed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) after a new mental health diagnosis for Resident #17. This affected one (Resident #17) of five reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Record review of Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 07/23/19. Diagnoses included visual hallucinations and delusional disorder. Review of Resident #17's pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR), dated 07/23/19, revealed diagnosis of mental disorders included mood disorder and delusional disorder only. Schizophrenia was not marked. Review of the resident's diagnosis sheet revealed a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was given to the resident on 08/14/19. There was not a new PASARR after the resident's new diagnosis of schizophrenia. Interview with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #648 on 02/26/20 at 3:25 P.M. verified the new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder on 08/14/19 and a new PASARR was not completed after the new diagnosis as required.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility's policy and observation, the facility failed to develop and implement fall interventions for Resident #7, an oxygen administration care plan for Resident #24, and a wandering care plan for Resident #66. This affected three (#7, #24 and #66) of 23 resident's care plans reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lack of coordination, repeated falls, heart failure, unspecified, arteriosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, Parkinson's disease, bilateral primary osteopathic of knee and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the care plan, dated 06/13/19, revealed the resident was at risk for pressure related skin alteration injury to rule out decreased strength, decreased mobility, surgical incision to the right knee, decreased muscle mass and co-mobilities. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide timely personal hygiene care to a resident who required extensive assistance from staff for personal hygiene. This affected one (#68) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 87. Findings included: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/19. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, gastrostomy, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. The resident was noted to be hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] for an upper gastrointestinal bleed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/20, revealed the resident was significantly cognitively impaired and the resident required the extensive assistance of one person for hygiene care needs and was totally dependent on the assistance for bathing needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions as indicated in a resident's care plan by not adding non-slip strips to the floor next to the resident's bed or in front of the resident's toilet. This affected one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical chart revealed an admission date of 01/06/18. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness and agitation, generalized anxiety disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, history of falling, and fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/20, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required assistance from two staff persons with activities of daily living. Review of the Incident Report, dated 01/10/20, revealed Resident #61 had a fall in her room after the resident attempted to transfer herself…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to administer Resident #68's tube feeding per physicians order. This affected one (#68) of one residents reviewed with a tube feeding care need. The facility identified seven residents receiving tube feed. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/19. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy and acute respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/20, revealed the resident was significantly cognitively impaired and was totally dependent on the assistance of another person for eating. Review of the physician orders, dated 02/18/20, revealed an order to administer enteral feed order one time a day from 9:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M. at 50 milliliters per hour for 22 hours. Review of the care plan, dated 02/19/20 revealed the resident required tube feeding due to dysphagia and an intervention to provide treatment as ordered to gastrostomy tube, provide medications as ordered, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to obtain an oxygen order and then follow the physician for Resident #24 and failed to properly date and label the oxygen tubing for Resident #24 and Resident #77. This affected two (#24 and #77) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 14 residents who receive respiratory care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/19. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, shortness of breath and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/17/20, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and the resident used oxygen therapy. Review of the progress notes, dated 02/04/20, revealed the resident was on three liters of oxygen continuously via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #24's physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to address monthly pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 05/10/19. Diagnoses included anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/19, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the pharmacy recommendation, dated 11/18/19, revealed Resident #53 had an order for hydroxyzine, an antihistamine medication that can be used to treat anxiety, 25 milligrams (mg.) every eight hours as needed for anxiety, which was in place for greater than 14 days, and Resident #53 had not received a dose in the past 60 days. The pharmacist recommended the medication be discontinued due to non-use. The pharmacy recommendation was never addressed by the physician. Review of a second pharmacy recommendation, dated 11/18/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments when they left a medication cart unlocked on unit A. This had the potential to affect four residents (Resident #6, #37, #81 and #238) who were cognitively impaired and self mobile. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 02/24/20 at 12:33 P.M. on unit A revealed an unlocked medication cart sitting by the nurse's station. No staff member was around the nurse station. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #653 on 02/24/20 at 12:35 P.M. verified the medication cart was unlocked. LPN #653 stated she was not working on the floor today and LPN #577 was in charge of the unit A medication cart. Review of the facility's list of resident who were cognitively impaired, self mobile and resided on unit A revealed Resident #6, #37, #81 and #238 were cognitively impaired, self mobile and resided on unit A. Review of the facility's storage of medication policy, dated 04/01/07, revealed compartments including and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-09-22 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide bed hold notices, and transfer/discharge notices to residents being sent to the hospital and to notify the ombudsman monthly of facility discharges. This affected three residents (#3, #55, and #109) of three reviewed for hospitalization.Findings Include: 1.Review of Resident #109‘s medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/25, a discharge date of 06/30/25 and diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage three, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, hypertension and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/24/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required set up assistance for eating and substantial/maximal assist for bathing, toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Further review revealed Resident #109 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-06-27 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received an annual performance evaluation. This affected two (State Tested Nurse Aides #103 and #112) out of two nurse aides reviewed for annual performance evaluations. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #103's personnel record revealed she was hired on 11/09/21. Review of her performance evaluation documentation revealed she had not had an annual performance evaluation completed since being hired on 11/09/21. Review of STNA #112's personnel record revealed she was hired on 07/22/10. Review of her performance evaluation documentation revealed she had not had an annual performance evaluation in the prior 12 months. Interview with the Administrator on 06/21/23 at 2:40 P.M. confirmed both staff (STNA #103 and STNA #112) had not had an annual performance evaluation in the last 12 months. He confirmed the facility has had turnover in the human resource department, so some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$337,273 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $272,940 — penalty dated 2025-09-11
  • $64,333 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-18 for 75 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-06 for 18 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID OBERLANDER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SAPPHIRE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 12/31/2024
OBERLANDER, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF75%since 12/31/2024
WENGER, YEHUDAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 12/31/2024
DMT SPE I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
STELLAR CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MATHUR, DEEPAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MILLS, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
LTC PROVIDER SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
RW CORWIN & COMPANY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$492K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 23%Medicare 4%Other / private 73%

This home reported $492K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,464per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$283per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365950. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next