New Dawn Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
865 East Iron Avenue, Dover, OH 44622 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (330) 343-5521 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2024
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.3% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 36.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.0% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 27.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 31.6–55.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.6–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 23.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.5–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 68.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.02 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population. This affected 68 of 68 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview on 06/08/26 at 9:39 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed there was not enough staff in the facility. It seemed like there were just less and less people to help.Interview on 06/08/26 at 9:41 A.M. with Resident #7 revealed there was not enough staff in the building. There was no specific time staffing is short, its all shifts and all days of the week. When she [Resident #7] calls for assistance, it takes a long time.Interview on 06/08/26 at 11:01 A.M. with Resident #39's representative revealed call lights are always going off, they aren't answered timely, you have to wait a long time for incontinence care or to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of pictures, review of concern log, and interview the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for the residents. This affected three residents (#2, #7 and #39) of 28 residents reviewed during the initial pool. Findings include: 1.Medical record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of Resident #39's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was not on a toileting program and was frequently incontinent of urine and was continent of bowel. Observation on 06/08/26 at 12:30 P.M. and 1:18 P.M. of 400 hallway revealed the hallway smelled of urine. Observation on 06/09/26 at 2:21 P.M., of Resident #39's room with Resident #39's daughter revealed the resident's bed sheet had a yellow ring. Resident #39's daughter smelled the area and reported the area smelled of urine. There was urine dried on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was dependent on staff for personal care, received the assistance needed with receiving showers as scheduled. This affected one resident (#78) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include:Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was hospitalized between 04/30/26 and 05/31/26, before returning to the facility as a re-admission. Her diagnoses included reduced mobility, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, stroke, muscle spasms, difficulty walking, dependence on a wheelchair, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #78's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was not indicated to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven days of the seven day assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed to determine the type of urinary incontinence and failed to implement an effective treatment plan to address the resident's incontinence. This affected one resident (#54) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The census was 68. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left rib fracture, urinary tract infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #54's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/07/26 revealed a brief interview for mental status score was unable to obtain. The resident had no displayed behaviors. The resident utilized a walker for mobility. The resident required set up or clean-up assistance for eating, supervision or touching assistance for upper body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's meal intakes were monitored and the resident was comprehensively assessed regarding weight loss. This affected one resident (#54) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 68. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left rib fracture, urinary tract infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #54's care plan initiated on 05/06/26 revealed the resident had a nutrition risk related to left sided rib fracture, dementia, chronic kidney disease, metabolic encephalopathy, weakness, altered mental status and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Goals included the resident would maintain nutritional status through next review period. Interventions included monitoring the resident's meal intakes. Review of Resident #54's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record reviews, policy reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control procedures for catheter care, wound care, and medication administration. This affected two (Residents #2 and #55) of seven residents observed during medication administration, one (Resident #67) of one resident observed for wound care, and one (Resident #25) of one resident observed for catheter care.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and urinary tract infection (UTI). On 02/22/26, an order was received to administer meropenem one gram intravenously every eight hours for a UTI for seven days.During an observation on 02/24/26 at 9:33 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 was observed administering the meropenem to Resident #55 through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). LPN #206 did not don a gown prior to administering the meropenem. There was a sign on Resident #55's door for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).During an interview on 02/24/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were monitoring a resident's blood pressures prior to administration of medications which had the potential to lower the resident's blood pressure. This affected one (Resident #18) of six residents observed for medication administration.Findings include:On 02/25/26 between 8:55 A.M. and 9:05 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #252 was observed administering medications to Resident #18. Among the medications administered were lisinopril (angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which is used to manage high blood pressure) 20 milligrams (mg) and metoprolol succinate (beta blocker used to treat high blood pressure) 50 mg. RN #252 obtained Resident #18's blood pressure after administering the blood pressure medication.During an interview on 02/25/26 at 9:09 A.M., RN #252 verified Resident #18's blood pressure should have been obtained prior to administering the medications.Further review of Resident #18's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for a resident at a high risk for falls. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for falls.Findings include:Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia, repeated falls, generalized muscle weakness and difficulty walking. A plan of care initiated 11/11/22 indicated Resident #64 was at risk for falls related to weakness, co-morbidities (medical conditions that coexist alongside a primary diagnosis, affecting health, treatment, and prognosis), incontinence, and medication use. One of the interventions dated 11/16/23 included placing a dycem to wheelchair (Dycem is a non-slip material). The physician orders revealed an order dated 11/05/23 for a non-skid sheet to the wheelchair.The fall risk evaluation dated 11/04/25 revealed Resident #64 was at a high risk for falls. Risk factors included multiple falls experienced within the last six months, medication use (including diabetic medications, blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was complete and accurate. This affected one (Resident #103) of 13 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy.Findings include: Review of Resident #103's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/25. Diagnoses included a non-displaced fracture of the left wrist, depression, bipolar disorder, malignant melanoma of the trunk and congestive heart failure. a. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] at 1:17 A.M. indicated Resident #103 was alert but confused. The section of the assessment indicating general care to be provided by nursing assistants included catheter care. Review of documentation for catheter care on the nursing assistant task bar from 12/26/25 to 01/21/25 revealed the catheter care was scheduled to be provided every shift and there was no documentation it was completed except for three days. There were three shifts (day shift on 01/16/26, 01/17/26 and 01/18/26) which were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the infection control log, review of guidance from National Library of Medicine, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics. This affected two (Residents #2 and #24) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the McGeer criteria for a urinary tract infection (IUTI) from National Library of Medicine for Surveillance Definitions of Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities: Revisiting the McGeer Criteria dated October 2012 revealed the resident must meet both categories: 1. Clinical signs and symptoms which included acute dysuria or fever or leukocytosis plus one ore more of: suprapubic pain, costovertebral pain/tenderness, gross hematuria, new/increased urgency, frequency. If there is no fever/leukocytosis then two of the above symptoms must be met. The second criteria was microbiological evidence which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a call light system that was readily accessible to its residents. This affected two (Residents #19 and #30) of three residents reviewed for call light accessibility. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder.Review of the care plan dated 07/09/20 revealed Resident #19 was at risk for falls related to diagnoses. Interventions included to be sure the resident's call light was within reach and have a sign in place in sight to remind Resident #19 to use her call light for assistance.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Observation and interview on 02/23/26 at 10:09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures during incontinence care. This effected one (Resident #63) of six residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/13/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, morbid obesity, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and erythema intertrigo. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed cognition was intact. She required set up or clean up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, dependent for toileting, shower, bathing and dressing and substantial maximal assistance with personal hygiene. The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel.Observation of incontinence care to Resident #63 on 08/26/25 at 11:10 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #111 brought a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician notification occurred related to elevated blood glucose levels resulting in the potential for inadequate diabetes management. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of five residents reviewed for medication management. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, malnutrition, end stage renal disease, type one diabetes, [NAME] disease, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and major depressive disorder.Review of minimum data set revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 12 out of a possible 15 points indicating some cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39 care plan dated 06/23/25 revealed the resident has diabetes mellitus. Interventions included diabetes medication as ordered by doctor.Record review of Resident #39 vital signs revealed on 07/25/25 at 8:00 P.M. Resident #39 blood sugar check was 578. On 07/26/25 at 5:17 A.M Resident #39 blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of physician orders, review of drug manufacturer information, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and drug manufacturer directions. Four errors were identified out of 37 opportunities for error, resulting in a 10.8% medication error rate. This affected two (Residents #30 and #51) of five residents observed having medications administered by staff. Findings include: 1. On 02/18/25 at 7:40 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #105 was observed administering medication to Resident #51. Among the medications administered were amlodipine (a calcium channel blocker used to treat hypertension, coronary artery disease and some angina) 10 milligrams (mg), hydralazine (vasodilator used to treat high blood pressure) 50 mg, and metoprolol succinate (beta blocker) 25 mg. The medications were administered during the process of obtaining vital signs. On 02/18/25 at 7:50 A.M., LPN #105 was questioned regarding if there were parameters set for administration of the medications. Resident #51's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of consultant reports, review of hospital records, and interview, the facility failed to write/transcribe orders resulting in a resident receiving ongoing treatment with an anti-neoplastic medication beyond ordered duration. This affected one (Resident #69) of three residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 11/19/24. Diagnoses included pleural effusion, pneumonia, difficulty walking, abnormal posture, generalized muscle weakness, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, sick sinus syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, hypothyroidism, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, metabolic encephalopathy, non-rheumatic aortic stenosis, congestive heart failure, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hematemesis (vomiting blood). A social service progress note dated 12/27/24 at 11:15 A.M. indicated a call was received from Resident #69's daughter who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records were maintained in an accurate and complete manner for one (Resident #63) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed diagnoses including hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, intervertebral disc disorders, and arthropathies of the right shoulder. Review of Resident #63's January 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no donning of the ordered lidocaine patch on 01/04/25 or 01/31/25. There was no documentation lidocaine patches were removed in accordance with physician orders on 01/14/25, 01/19/25 or 01/31/25. Resident #63 had an order for blood glucose monitoring with sliding scale insulin coverage four times a day. No results were recorded on 01/12/25 at 5:00 A.M. or on 01/19/25 and 01/30/25 at 5:00 P.M. It was unable to be determined if the sliding scale insulin should have been administered. The February 2025 MAR revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) call report review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #72 received timely care and services which resulted in the resident reaching out to an outside entity for assistance. This affected one (Resident #72) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #72's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 and discharge date of 01/02/25. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, depression, and acquired absence of right leg below the knee. Review of Resident #72's History and Physical dated 12/23/24 revealed the resident had decreased mobility, painful movement, poor strength, and had a right below the knee amputation. The resident was noted to be alert and oriented. Review of Resident #72's care plan dated 12/23/24 revealed the resident had diabetes mellitus with interventions to monitor, document, and report to the physician signs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Controlled Medication Shift Change Log, controlled medication signature sheets, record review, review of the staff schedule, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident medications. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#7, #8, #11, #16, #17, #23, #25, #26, #28, #29 and #71) who received narcotic medication and resided on the 200 hall. The facility census was 70. Findings include: On [DATE] at 3:19 P.M. review of the 200 front hall Controlled Medication Shift Change Log revealed the staff was counting the medication cards/containers and controlled medication signature sheets at the change of shift and signing the log. However, staff were not consistently writing the number of medications and signature sheets counted and the new medications delivered or medications removed from the cart. Review of the November (2024) Controlled Medication Shift change log for the 200 front hall medication cart revealed the amount of cards/containers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation of controlled medications. This affected 33 residents (#2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, #11, #16, #17, #20, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #37, #43, #44, #46, #48, #49, #51, #53, #59, #60, #61, #62, #65, #66 and #67) who were ordered controlled medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 2:13 P.M. review of the 100 hall Controlled Medication Shift Change Log revealed there was no record of controlled medication reconciliation the morning of [DATE]. Review of the Controlled Medication Shift Change Log revealed staff was to count the number of cards/containers of medication in the locked controlled medication staff drawer and the number of sign off sheets for each medication. The staff was to write down the resident's name, medication, strength and quantity when a controlled medication is delivered from the pharmacy as well as the adjusted card and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was completed of diabetic foot ulcers. This affected one resident (#8) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured neck of right femur, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell type in remission, abnormal posture, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, falls, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, mixed hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease and cardiac pacemaker. The resident was admitted with a right and left plantar diabetic foot ulcers. Review of the 09/24/24 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making. Physician orders included a 09/25/24 treatment to bilateral plantar wounds to cleanse wound with normal saline, apply prism, and cover with dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment of pressure ulcers was completed and consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, cerebral infarction, dementia, depression, atrial flutter, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Stage IV pressure ulcer (defined as full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) to the sacrum, and cardiac pacemaker. Record review revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] with osteomyelitis of left foot, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring with the administration of narcotic pain medication. This affected two residents (#8 and #26) of four residents reviewed for narcotics. The census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8 's medical record revealed a 09/17/24 admission with diagnoses including fractured neck of right femur, chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell type in remission, abnormal posture, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, muscle weakness, falls, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, mixed hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease and cardiac pacemaker. Physician orders revealed an order dated 09/17/24 for Oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the 09/24/24 admission Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was independent for daily decision making. On 11/14/24 at 1:48 P.M. interview with Resident #8 revealed he just gets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of controlled medication reconciliation records, observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic medication was labeled to meet professional standards. This affected two residents (Resident #26 and #62) of 33 residents with controlled medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. On 11/14/24 at 2:45 P.M. review of the 400 hall Controlled Medication Shift Change Log revealed the staff was counting the medication cards/containers and controlled medication signature sheets at the change of shift and signing the log. Review and observation of the signature sheets for the controlled medications in the locked drawer revealed Resident #62 had a prescription for Tramadol, a Class IV narcotic. The label read: Tramadol HCL tablet 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet once daily: one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed. Review of the medical record revealed the resident had a physician's order dated 01/26/24 for Tramadol 50 mg by mouth every 24 hours as needed for pain. On 01/26/24 there was also an order to give Tramadol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records. This affected two residents (#16, #71) of nine residents reviewed. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's closed medical record revealed a [DATE] admission with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of anus. The resident expired [DATE]. Review of an Individual Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record for Morphine Sulfate 15 mg Immediate Release delivered [DATE] revealed one tablet was ordered every six hours for pain as needed. Review revealed on [DATE] at 11:30 P.M. two doses of morphine were signed out by Registered Nurse (RN) #174 instead of one dose without explanation. Review revealed on [DATE] at 4:00 A.M. two doses of morphine were signed out by RN #174. One dose stated the resident dropped the medication. There was no evidence of RN #174 wasting the medication with a witness. Review of an Individual Patient Controlled Substance Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed as ordered during a dressing change. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed a 05/03/22 admission with diagnoses including hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, cerebral infarction, dementia, depression, atrial flutter, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, type II diabetes, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease, Stage IV (defined as full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) pressure ulcer to sacrum, and cardiac pacemaker. Review of a quarterly 09/21/24 Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident required substantial/maximum assist to roll from side to side. The resident had one Stage IV pressure ulcer. Physician orders included on 05/14/24 a low air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and completion of a test tray the facility did not ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: Interviews on 07/01/24 from 9:00 A.M. through 3:00 P.M. with Residents #3, #13, #14, #119 and #218 during the screening process revealed concerns with palatability of food indicating it was often cold. Observation on 07/02/24 at 11:15 A.M. revealed the food temperatures on the steam table were above 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A test tray was requested and plated at 12:22 P.M. The residents' meal trays and test tray were delivered to the floor at 12:31 P.M. Staff began passing the meal trays at 12:32 P.M. At 12:43 P.M., after the last resident received their meal tray, the temperature of the food on the test tray was measured and the food tasted. The BBQ ribs were 98 degrees (F) and the sweet potato fries were 94.3 degrees F. [NAME] #821 verified the temperatures. The food felt cool to touch and tasted luke warm.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure dishes and eating utensils were sanitized appropriately when the high temperature dish machine was not meeting the hot water temperature required for sanitization. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents who used dishes and cutlery from the kitchen. Findings include: Interview on 07/01/24 at 8:30 A.M. with [NAME] #821 revealed the dish machine sanitized via high temperature. [NAME] #821 also said the kitchen staff noticed the water temperature to the dish machine was lower when the laundry washing machine was running at the same time the dish machine was being used. Laundry staff was to hold running the washing machine until late morning. The facility was waiting for the hot water tank to be replaced. Observation of on 07/01/24 at 8:48 A.M. revealed a dietary aide rinsing and scrubbing dishes in a large grey colored bus tub filled with water and another tub labeled rinse prior to placing plates, cups and trays in a rack then sending the rack through the dish machine. Observation of the digital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure facial protection was available in areas where staff would spray soiled linens, failed to ensure the facility's water management program for legionella prevention was implemented, and failed to utilize the most current tuberculosis rates when reviewing their tuberculosis risk assessment. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents. Findings include: 1. During observations of the laundry room on 07/03/24 at 11:50 A.M. with Housekeeping staff #838, it was verified there was no facial shield available to avoid splatter from soiled linens. On 07/03/24 between 12:05 P.M. and 12:15 P.M., Housekeeper #838 stated there was no need to have a face shield in the laundry room because if laundry was soiled it was sent back to the floor for aides to rinse the laundry out. Observations of two of the four soiled utility rooms revealed hoppers for rinsing laundry but there were no shields for use. This was verified by Housekeeper #838 at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications were secured in an appropriate manner and discarded when expired. This affected three residents (Residents #21, #36 and #37) but had the potential to affect all 25 residents residing on the 200 unit. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #21 revealed an order for Insulin Glargine (Lantus) (medication for high blood sugar) 15 units one time a day dated [DATE]. Review of the Medication Administration Record for Resident #21 for [DATE] and [DATE] revealed she received the Lantus as ordered. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:19 A.M. of the 200 unit medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #801 revealed a bottle of Lantus for Resident #21 that was dated [DATE] when it was opened. LPN #801 verified the medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #227 and #228's personal funds were forwarded to the residents' estate within 30 days. This affected two (Residents #227 and #228) of two residents reviewed for personal funds after death. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #227 revealed an admission date of 06/04/22 with diagnoses including altered mental status, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Resident #227 passed away on 12/08/23. Review of Resident #227's personal funds statement dated from 01/01/20 through 06/30/24 revealed on 07/01/24 Resident #227 had a balance of $50.15. The facility debited her account on 07/01/24 for $50.15 which closed her account. A check was made out to the facility on [DATE] for $50.15. Interview with the Administrator on 07/03/24 at 1:21 P.M. verified Resident #227 passed away on 12/08/23 and her personal funds were not dispersed until 07/01/24 to the facility. The Administrator stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wish for receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was clearly established in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #128) of 24 residents reviewed for code status. Findings include: Review of Resident #128's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with an order for Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care - Arrest - Do Not Intubate (DNRCCA - DNI). DNR-CCA orders healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to provide comfort care in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Review of an Advance Directive Questionnaire dated [DATE] and signed by Resident #128 revealed she did want CPR provided. Review of a social service progress note dated [DATE] timed 2:15 P.M. revealed Resident #128 requested her advance directive be changed to full measures. Nursing was notified. On [DATE] at 3:44 P.M., the discrepancy between the order for DNRCCA-DNI and the signed Advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were established. This affected two Residents (#14 and #54) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 04/23/23 and diagnoses including congestive heart failure, depression, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician's order dated 04/08/24 revealed Resident #14 was on Vistaril 50 milligrams every eight hours for anxiety. Review of the current care plan for July 2024 revealed no evidence Resident #14's anxiety diagnosis or anti-anxiety medication use was addressed in the care plan. Interview on 07/03/24 at 9:41 A.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no care plan established for Resident #14's anxiety diagnosis or anti-anxiety medication use. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/15/23 and diagnoses including fracture of left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #43 and #55's care plans were revised to reflect all fall interventions. This affected two (Residents #43 and #55) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 11/13/23 with diagnoses including syncope and collapse, difficulty in walking and repeated falls. Review of the care plan dated 11/15/23 and last updated on 06/17/24 for Resident #55 revealed the facility did not revise her care plan for the fall on 03/01/24 to reflect a new fall intervention of hipsters (impact absorbing pads that are worn to reduce the risk of fractures). Review of the fall investigation dated 03/01/24 revealed Resident #55 had a fall, and the new intervention was to have the resident wear hipsters. Review of the physician's orders for July 2024 revealed Resident #55 did not have an order for hipsters to be worn as a fall intervention. Interview on 07/03/24 at 10:40 A.M. with the Director of Nursing verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review, review of the facility's activity calendar, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an individualized activity program was provided and group activities were scheduled to permit participation by one (Resident #121) of two residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: Review of Resident #121's medical record revealed diagnoses including anxiety disorder and metabolic encephalopathy. An Exceeding Expectations form indicated Resident #121 preferred group activities. Review of a modification of admission/Medicare five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #121 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #121 was assessed as cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 15 (out of a possible 15). The activity preference section of the MDS was completed with input by Resident #121 who indicated it was somewhat important to have reading material, listen to the music she liked, do things with groups of people, and do favorite activities. Resident #121…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of an anti-anxiety medication ordered on an as necessary basis. This affected one (Resident #130) of five residents reviewed for medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #130's medical record revealed diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (Lewy bodies are the inclusion bodies/ abnormal aggregations of protein, that develop inside nerve cells affected by Parkinson's disease, the Lewy body dementias, and some other disorders.), cerebrovascular disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. On 06/20/24, an order was written for Ativan (anti-anxiety) one half milligram (mg) every eight hours as needed for anxiety. On 06/21/24, a clarification to the order limited the use to a 14 day duration. Review of the June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the Ativan was administered on 06/20/24 at 10:56 P.M., 06/21/24 at 11:00 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccinations in accordance with recommended vaccination schedules from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). This affected two (Residents #130 and #226) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #226's medical record revealed an admission assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #226 was up to date on pneumococcal vaccinations with the last date of administration being 01/24/18. Review of Resident #226's immunization records revealed a pneumovax PPV 23 was administered on 01/27/17 when he was [AGE] years old and a dose of Prevnar 13 on 01/24/18 when he was [AGE] years old. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #808 on 07/01/24 at 5:35 P.M., she stated she believed since Resident #226 had a history of receiving both the PPV 23 and Prevnar 13 vaccines he was up to date and did not need any further pneumococcal vaccines offered. After reviewing the CDC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents on 100 hall (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) and one (Resident #41) of three residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 69. Findings include: 1. During tour of the facility on 05/06/24 between 4:22 A.M. and 4:55 A.M., a towel and bath blanket were observed on the floor in the 100 hall bathroom. A bath blanket was observed on the floor in the 100 hallway with safety cones. Resident #4 was observed sitting in her room, dressed in personal clothes, and coloring. During an interview on 05/06/24 during the tour after observations had been made on the 100 hall, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #100 reported the bath towel on the floor in the hall was due to a leak. The towel and bath blanket in the 100 hall bathroom were from Resident #4's shower and she had not had the opportunity to remove them from the floor. No leaks were observed during multiple observations on 05/06/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of fall investigations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for three (Residents #45, #46, and #56) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings include: During general observations on 05/06/24 and 05/07/24, Residents #45 and #46 were observed with mats placed beside their beds, when the residents were lying down in bed. 1. Review of Resident #45's open medical record revealed diagnoses including encephalopathy, restless and agitation, vascular dementia, generalized muscle weakness, abnormal posture and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #45's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 had one to two falls over the prior six months. Other risk factors for falls included medication use, confusion, total incontinence, confinement to a chair, inability to independently rise to a standing position and need for hands on assistance to move from place to place. Review of care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment in a sanitary manner for one (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for use of nebulizer equipment. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, and heart disease. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the following orders dated 01/26/24 albuterol sulfate 0.083%: three milliliters (ml) via nebulizer every six hours as needed; and also dated 01/26/24 nebusal inhalation nebulization solution 3%: give 3 ml via nebulizer twice a day. Observations on 05/06/24 at 7:55 A.M. revealed the nebulizer mask was not stored in a bag. This was verified by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #145 during the observation. Observations on 05/08/24 at 8:28 A.M. revealed Resident #51's nebulizer mask was sitting on the night stand. The machine was not running. Resident #51 indicated the mask came apart from the tubing the last time he was using the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview with staff and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident # 24, #32 and #68 received their physician ordered adaptive equipment for meals. This affected three residents (Resident #24, #32 and #68) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 71. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hypertension, ischemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had intact cognition. Review of the April 2024 physician's orders revealed Resident #68 had an order for two-handles cups and built-up silverware with all meals dated 03/07/24. Review of the meal ticket dated 04/04/24 revealed Resident #68 was to receive a two-handled cup with a lid and built-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility did not ensure Resident #17, #40 and #48 had safe and appropriate transportation services provided to them to get to their dialysis treatments at a dialysis center outside of the facility. This affected three residents (#17, #40, and #48) of four reviewed for transportation to dialysis. The facility identified four residents (#17, #24, #40 and #48) who required transportation to dialysis. The facility census was 71. Findings included: Observation was conducted on 04/10/24 at 7:30 A.M. of the distance and path of travel between the facility and the dialysis center. The path exited out the front doors of the facility, through the parking lot and up a road approximately 1000 feet from the facility. The road was a sub-road off of a main road between the facility and the dialysis center and was the road traffic needed to travel to get to various medical buildings spread out within the area. The traffic was light at the time of the observation. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and air temperature, the facility failed to ensure the 300 hall central shower room was a comfortable temperature. This affected 17 residents (Residents #2, #7, #12, #16, #25, #28, #33, #36, #39, #46, #49, #51, #53, #57, #59, #63 and #317) on the 300 hall who utilized the shower. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Interview 03/13/23 at 11:32 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed she was cold in the facility. Interview 03/13/23 at 2:44 P.M. with Resident #33 revealed it was cold in the shower room because the heater was broken. Interview 03/15/23 at 9:29 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #145 revealed she began working at the facility since December 2022 and the heater in the 300 hall central shower room had been broken since she started. The control knob was off. Interview 03/15/23 at 9:34 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #95 revealed she did not know anything about the 300 hall central shower room heater being broken but she had been told it was cold in the shower room. LPN #95 included maintenance was very responsive so if they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, interviews with staff and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure aerosol nebulizer masks were properly stored in a protective barrier for Residents #15, #49, #167, #168, and #169 and did not ensure the humidifier bottle was filled and oxygen orders were obtained for Resident #49. This affected five residents (Residents #15 #49, #167, #168, and #169) of five reviewed for respiratory therapy. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had diagnoses including respiratory failure, muscle weakness, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and erythema intertrigo. Review of physician's orders revealed Resident #15 had an order for Formoterol Fumarate Nebulization Solution 20 micrograms (mcg) every 12 hours for shortness of breath dated 12/23/22. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans in the areas of activities and activity of daily living. This affected two residents (Residents #12 and #217) of 17 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a 09/18/20 admission with diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure, acquired absence of left toes, cerebral infarction, anemia, cardiomyopathy, type two diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was moderately impaired for daily decision making, had adequate vision with no glasses, required extensive assist of two for bed mobility, dressing, transfers and toileting, did not walk, was independent for eating, required extensive assist of one for personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on two for bathing, and had two pressure ulcers. Interview 03/13/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the assistance required to keep their fingernails clean and trimmed. This affected two (Residents #2 and #217) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a 11/30/22 admission with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, congestive heart failure, age related physical, and depression. Resident #2 had an admission comprehensive Activity of Daily Living Self Care Performance Deficit plan of care related to weakness, repeated falls, rheumatoid arthritis and age related debility. Interventions included Resident #2 required staff participation with personal hygiene. Review of the 02/10/23 quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #2 was independent for daily decision making, felt tired and down, had trouble falling asleep and little interest in doing things 12-14 days in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing orders were written timely for Resident #8, dressing changes were completed and/or documented as completed for Residents #8, and #12, pressure reducing devices were in place as ordered for Residents #53 and a pressure ulcer dressing was applied after a shower, and ensure Resident #12's air mattress was supported to ensure his feet were not in a dependent position. This affected three (Residents #8, #12 and #53) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a 09/18/20 admission with diagnoses including dementia, stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin that extends to the subcutaneous tissue but does not cross the fascia beneath it) pressure ulcer, stage 4 (full-thickness skin loss extending through the fascia with considerable tissue loss) sacral ulcer, congestive heart failure, acquired absence of left toes, cerebral infarction, anemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure orders where in place for Resident #47's dialysis treatments and ensure the dialysis access site was assessed. This affected one out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified two residents who received dialysis (Residents #47 and #49). The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/03/21. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #47's the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/23, revealed Resident #47 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #47's care plan, dated 03/10/23, revealed Resident #47 required dialysis related to end stage renal disease. Interventions included check and change dressing daily at access site as ordered, encourage resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, monitor bruit and thrill as ordered, monitor for any signs or symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and pharmacy recommendation review the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely for Residents #2 and #47. This affected two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #2, Resident #7, Resident #1, Resident #15, Resident #26). The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/03/21. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and peripheral vascular disease. The record revealed allergies to acetaminophen, meloxicam, and oxycodone. Review of Resident #47's the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/23, revealed Resident #47 had intact cognition. Review of a Pharmacy Recommendation dated 12/07/22 for Resident #47 revealed allergies to acetaminophen (severe), oxycodone (severe-psychosis), and meloxicam (cutaneous-pruritus). The recommendation further indicated Resident #47 was receiving acetaminophen 325…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to blend pureed food to a smooth consistency. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident on a pureed diet. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation of the pureed process 03/14/23 at 4:02 P.M. with [NAME] #122 revealed [NAME] #122 placing one two ounce serving of ham into the robot coup and adding water then blending. After blending [NAME] #122 placed the ham in a bowl. [NAME] #122 said he already pureed a serving of sweet potatoes for Resident #8, the only resident in the facility who received a pureed diet. The sweet potatoes were tasted and found to be lumpy. When [NAME] #122 tasted the pureed sweet potatoes he stated it was stringy. Interview on 03/14/23 at 4:18 P.M. with [NAME] #122 verified the sweet potatoes were stringy and lumpy, not a smooth consistency.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment as required. This affected one (Resident #31) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Medicare-5 day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 required limited assist with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use, was independent with eating, had no behaviors and was continent of bowel. The resident's mood was not assessed. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use, required supervision with eating, behavioral symptoms occurred up to four to six days and the resident was occasionally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete resident comprehensive assessments. This affected three (Residents #31, #37, and #45) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31's mood and influenza vaccination was not assessed/no information. Review of Resident #31's care plans revealed the resident had mood problems. On 05/04/21 at 7:40 A.M., Assistant Administrator #567 verified via electronic mail Resident #31's quarterly MDS assessment was not accurate. 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscular dystrophy, diabetes mellitus, and history of urinary tract infections.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide resident representatives with written baseline care plans. This affected one (Resident #31) of five newly admitted sample residents. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Baseline Care Plan dated 12/15/2020 revealed the resident representative was provided the baseline care plan verbally. Further review of the Baseline Care Plan dated 12/15/2020 revealed no date/time documented as to when and who provided the information to the representative. There was also no evidence the representative was mailed or provided a written copy of the baseline care plan. On 05/04/21 at 11:14 A.M., the Administrator verified via electronic mail there was only verbal review of the baseline care plan on 12/15/2020 with Resident #31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were accurate. This affected two (Residents #31 and #37) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use, required supervision with eating, behavioral symptoms occurred up to four to six days and the resident was occasionally incontinent bowel. Review of the care plan: ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit revised 12/16/2020 revealed no evidence of amount of assist with ADL's decline and/or new interventions to prevent further decline. Review of the care plan: Antipsychotic Medication related to Behavior Management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to assist dependent residents with the removal of unwanted facial hair. This affected one (Resident #42) of two residents sampled for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, atrial fibrillation, and muscle weakness. Review of the ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit dated 12/17/19 revealed the resident required staff assistance with personal hygiene due to activity intolerance, dementia, and fatigue. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was severely impaired for daily decision-making and required extensive assist with personal hygiene. On 04/27/21 at 11:42 A.M., observation revealed inch long, white whiskers observed extending from Resident #42's chin. On 05/03/21 at 12:38 P.M., observation of Resident #42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, operator manual review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure relief interventions were implemented. This affected one (Resident #37) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscular dystrophy, diabetes mellitus, and history of urinary tract infections. As of 04/20/21, Resident #37 weighed 150 pounds. Review of the care plan: Potential for Pressure Ulcer Development dated 09/30/2020 revealed Resident #37 had the potential for pressure ulcer development due to weakness, impaired mobility, friction/shearing, spends the majority of her time in bed, and diagnosis of Muscular Dystrophy. Interventions included to encourage and assist resident to float heels when in bed, pressure relieving device on bed and treatments as ordered. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure positioning boots to prevent contractures were available for use as ordered. This affected one (Resident #37) resident reviewed for positioning. This facility census was 57 residents. Finding include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscular dystrophy, diabetes mellitus, and history of urinary tract infections. Review of the Physical Therapy Evaluation & Plan of Treatment dated 03/04/21 through 03/17/21 revealed staff was educated in lower extremity range of motion (ROM) exercise and application of bilateral ankle braces to prevent contractures, left ankle passive ROM (PROM) to prevent contractures and improve right knee flexion, active assist ROM (AAROM), and left knee flexion AAROM/PROM to enable the resident to position lower extremities to assist with bed mobility tasks. Review of the Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for a resident diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disturbances. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for dementia. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, tremor, and major depressive disorder. On 03/02/21, the resident was diagnosed with anxiety, and on 03/22/21, the resident was diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the care plan: Antipsychotic medication for behavior management dated 03/25/21 revealed the resident recently displayed marked aggression (physical and verbal) towards staff. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered; monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness; monitor/record occurrence of target behavior symptoms: inappropriate response to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to psychotropic drugs administered to residents with dementia. This affected one (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for dementia. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, tremor, and major depressive disorder. On 03/02/21, the resident was diagnosed with anxiety and on 03/22/21, the resident was diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the Medicare-5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was severely impaired for daily decision-making; required limited assist with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use; was independent with eating; had no behaviors, no psychosis, no wandering; and was continent of bowel. The resident's mood was not assessed. Review of the quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, medication guideline review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications without error. This affected two (Resident #50 and #157) of eight residents observed for 26 medication opportunities. The medication error rate was 7.69%. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified anemia. Review of the electronic physician orders dated April 2021 revealed Resident #50 received ferrous sulfate (iron) 325 milligrams (mg) twice a day. On 04/28/21 at 4:10 P.M., observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #515 administered medications including ferrous sulfate 325 mg to Resident #50. LPN #515 crushed the ferrous sulfate tablet, mixed it food and administered it to the resident. On 04/28/21 at 4:59 P.M., interview with LPN #515 verified she crushed ferrous sulfate and administered it to Resident #50. Review of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure multi-dose medications were labeled with date when opened and not outdated. This affected two (Residents #36 and #162) of 11 resident receiving insulin. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: 1. On 05/03/21 at 3:32 P.M. an observation of the 100/200 hall medication cart revealed an opened Tresiba (insulin) Flex pen belonging to Resident #162. The insulin was brought from home and there was no date when insulin was opened. There was also a Humalog (insulin) flex pen belonging to Resident #162, which was bought from home and there was no date indicating when insulin was opened. In addition, the Humalog flex pen belonging to Resident #162 arrived to the facility on [DATE] with a sticker on the packing indicating to refrigerate until ready to use, however, this was being stored in the medication cart and not in the refrigerator. Interview on 05/03/21 at 3:38 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #518 verified insulin is to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain comprehensive and accurate medical records. This affected two (Residents #31 and #37) of 12 residents reviewed. The facility census was 57 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscular dystrophy, diabetes mellitus, and history of urinary tract infections. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact and received oxygen. Review of the care plan: Oxygen Therapy related to Respiratory illness diagnosed COVID dated 06/18/2020 revealed the resident was on continuous humidified oxygen at 6 liters. On 04/26/21 at 2:41 P.M., observation revealed Resident #37 was not wearing oxygen and did not have an oxygen concentrator/equipment in her room. At the time of the observation, Resident #37 stated she has not worn oxygen since recovering from COVID-19 last year. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to maintain acceptable standards of infection control during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #27) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 57 residents Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 02/01/21. Diagnosis including pressure ulcer, adult failure to thrive and surgical amputation. Review of Orders for April 2021 revealed dressing change for right lateral distal knee; cleanse with normal saline (NS); apply puracol ag (collagen wound dressing) to wound bed; cover with foam dressing; and change daily and as needed. Observation on 04/29/21 at 2:30 P.M. of Resident #27's dressing change with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #518 revealed LPN #518 washed her hands and applied two sets of gloves (double gloving), then placed a barrier down on bed and put dressing material on it. LPN #518 proceeded to remove the old dressing dated 04/29/21, and place it on the clean barrier. She then opened a 4x4 gauze and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to DAVID OBERLANDER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYF INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 08/08/2019 |
| SAM INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 08/08/2019 |
| OBERLANDER, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 08/08/2019 |
| OBERLANDER, SHOLEM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 08/08/2019 |
| OASIS NURSING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2019 |
| SCHACHTER, SHAEVY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 08/08/2019 |
| SINCERE CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| JONES, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2019 |
| SCHUPBACH, SONDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365990. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.