No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oasis Center For Rehabilitation And Healing

850 East Midlothian Blvd, Youngstown, OH 44507 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (330) 788-3038 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 788-3038 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jun 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
77 E Midlothian Blvd · (330) 788-2487 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.0 mi
540 E Midlothian Blvd · (330) 782-0807 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3122 Market St · (330) 781-7134 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3403 Hudson Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms92.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.1%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.221.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.331.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.3%CMS range 28.4–72.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.2–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting16.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.4–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
44.9%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for Resident #101 to prevent the development of a facility acquired pressure ulcer to the back of the resident's neck. Actual Harm occurred on 02/27/24 when Resident #101, who was cognitively impaired, ventilator dependent, at risk for pressure ulcer development and required total dependence on staff for bed mobility and all activities of daily living, was assessed on 02/27/24 by Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #703 to have a Stage IV (full thickness skin and tissue loss) facility acquired pressure ulcer with correction of the staging completed on 03/05/24 to an unstageable (full thickness loss of tissue completely covered by dead tissue) pressure ulcer to his rear neck found under his tracheostomy ties. The pressure ulcer measured 2.0 centimeters (cm) in width by 1.2 cm in length with no depth noted with the pressure ulcer having 100 percent eschar (dead…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40 was provided with timely care and services following a fall. This finding affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for falls.Findings include:Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, muscle weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of Resident #40's Unwitnessed Fall investigation report dated 02/02/26 at 4:20 P.M. revealed the resident was heard yelling in the hallway by staff and the resident was noted in a sitting position on the floor. The resident was leaning on the wheel of the unlocked wheelchair beside the bed. Resident #40 stated her elbow was hurting and bruising was noted along with swelling to the right elbow. Normal range of motion was noted. Upon going back to room to obtain vitals post fall, the resident told the nurse that her right hip and right upper leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 92.Findings include: On 01/12/26 between 9:45 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. an initial tour of the building was conducted. The following findings were observed:- room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have stained tiles in the room. A buildup of visible dirt and debris was noted behind the entrance door. The tiles in the bathroom were noted to be coming up. Visible dirt and debris were noted within the heating unit. Visible dirt and food were noted on the floor beneath the locked closet. The findings were verified by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #316 at the time of the observation.- room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a buildup of visible dirt and debris behind the entrance door. Room floor tiles were noted to be stained. The bathroom was noted to have chipped floor tile. The bathroom door was noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure safe smoking practices within the facility for Residents #67 and #34. This affected two residents (#67 and #34) out of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 92.Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, disorders of bone density and structure, rheumatoid arthritis, pain in left hip, patient's noncompliance with other medical treatment and regimen due to unspecified reason, mental disorder, major depressive disorder, acquired absence of the right leg below the knee, tobacco use, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of the Smokers List provided by the facility revealed as of 09/05/25, Resident #67 was on the independent smokers list.Review of the psych note dated 09/08/25 revealed the nurse practitioner observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe fashion. This affected one resident (#43) of 92 residents observed for medications at the bedside. The facility census was 92.Findings include:A review of medical records for Resident #43 revealed a date of admission of 10/08/25. Significant diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus type II with hyperglycemia, acute pulmonary edema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, and shortness of breath. Significant orders included, Isosorbide 10 milligrams, 1 tablet by mouth three times a day for hypertension, Atorvastatin 40 milligrams give one tablet by mouth daily for cholesterol, Nifedipine 90 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth one time daily for hypertension, hydrochlorothiazide 25 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth daily for hypertension, Magnesium 400 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth daily as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility to ensure call lights were in reach. This affected two residents (#24 and #41) of 92 residents observed for call lights. The facility census was 92.Findings include:1. A review of the medical records for Resident #24 revealed the date of admission as 12/13/24. Significant diagnosis included unspecified dementia, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, unspecified other amnesia, personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, age-related cognitive decline, and unspecified non traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. There were no significant orders regarding the citation. A care plan dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #24 was at risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, and gate balance problems. Interventions included to be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed.An annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified seven residents (#7, #25, #44, #50, #52, #61, and #85) as receiving nothing by mouth. The census was 92. Findings include: 1.Observation of the kitchen on 09/10/24 from 8:14 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. with Cook/Assistant Dietary Director (DD) #365 and DD #366 revealed the following concerns: In the walk in cooler, there was one half factory bag of shredded mozzarella cheese opened and resealed with plastic wrap with no date; four waffles wrapped in plastic wrap with no date; one hardboiled egg wrapped in plastic wrap with no date; one factory bag with four hardboiled eggs opened and resealed with plastic wrap with no date, and two opened, approximately four inch, stacks of sliced American cheese resealed with plastic wrap with no date. On a metal shelf under the exhaust hood to the left of the ovens revealed an opened bag with an unidentified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policies, facility menu, and job descriptions, the facility administration failed to ensure there was an adequate supply of emergency food and water on hand as required. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the administrator job description revealed the administrator was responsible for establishing systems to enforce the facility policies and procedures and to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations. Review of maintenance supervisor job description revealed the maintenance supervisor would observe all facility policies and procedures and develop and implement maintenance systems to meets residents' needs in compliance with federal, state and local requirements. Review of Food Service Director job description revealed the food service director would implement dietary and food service policies and procedures to meet residents' needs and in compliance with federal, state, and local requirements and a monitoring system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu as written. This affected two residents (#5 and #89) of five residents reviewed for nutrition and had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen excluding seven residents (#7, #25, #44, #50, #52, #61 and #85) who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1.Review of medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/02/23. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity due to excess calories, schizophreniform disorder, anxiety disorder, congestive diastolic heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/12/24, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact and was independent for eating. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #5 had a diet order dated 05/31/24 for CCHO (consistent carbohydrate)/NAS (no added salt) diet, mechanically altered chopped texture, thin liquids consistency. Observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure palatable food was served to all residents. This affected three residents (#36, #39 and #45) of five residents reviewed for nutrition and had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified seven residents (#7, #25, #44, #50, #52, #61, and #85) as not receiving anything by mouth. The census was 92. Findings include: 1.Review of the spread sheet for lunch on 09/10/24 revealed one three ounce chicken breast, one four ounce spoodle or one number eight scoop of parmesan creamed noodles, one four ounce slotted spoodle of French style green beans, one dinner roll, mixed fruit, milk of choice and beverage of choice was to be served. During observation of tray line on 09/10/24 between 11:45 A.M. and 1:15 P.M. revealed the noodles appeared to not have any cream sauce on them. Interview on 09/10/24 at 12:00 P.M. with Dietary [NAME] #362 confirmed there was no cream sauce on the noodles. She stated she had put butter and dried parmesan on the noodles and had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure the memory care unit environment was maintained in a clean, comfortable and homelike manner. This had the potential to affect all 22 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #7, #8, #12, #13, #16, #23, #32, #40, #55, #58, #62, #64, #67, #71, #72, #75, #85, #86, and # 94) living on the memory care unit out of 94 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 05/14/24 at 8:25 A.M. on the memory care unit and revealed upon entering the unit there was a strong, pervasive odor of foul smelling urine present, and the smell carried throughout the entire unit. Interview on 05/14/24 at 8:40 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #703 revealed he confirmed the memory care unit had a strong odor of foul smelling urine. LPN #703 stated housekeeping did clean on the unit, however, they did not spend much time on the memory care unit and did not remove the foul smelling urine odor. Observation was conducted on 05/14/24 at 10:30 A.M. of housekeeping on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the Hydrion Test Strip instructions the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen to prepare food in a manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents (#15, #16, #18, #28 and #31) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Observation on 04/11/24 at 10:05 A.M. during a tour of the kitchen revealed a puree prep station with a buildup of grease and dirt on the bottom shelf. The top shelf of the puree prep station had a buildup of dirt on it. The white tiles around the walls in the kitchen had a buildup of black dirt on them. The microwave was dirty with dried food splatter in it. The three-sink sanitation station had a container of Hydrion strips (test strips to test the chemical levels for proper sanitization) expired 03/15/22. The findings were verified by the Dietary Manager (DM) #675 at the time of the tour. On 04/11/24 an interview with DM #675 during the tour of the kitchen revealed food preparation stations were to be cleaned after each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 04/11/24 at 9:35 A.M. during a tour of the facility revealed the shower room on 300-hall had broken tile around shower drain. The handwashing sink was visibly dirty. The supply cart for shower items had visible dirt on it. The paper towel dispenser had visible dirt on top of it. Hair and dirt were noted on baseboard heating unit. The tub had dirt around the drain (dirty buildup of soap scum), and the area around the tub ledge had a buildup of dirt on it. The floor was dirty. The toilet was full of a bowel movement. There were two broken tiles noted at the bottom of the doorway to that hall. The activity lounge on the 400-hall had visible dirt on the walls and chair rail. The base board heating unit had a buildup of dust on it. The windowsill had a buildup of dust and dirt. All observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure restorative range of motion (ROM) exercises were completed as ordered by the physician. This finding affected two residents (#8 and #76) of three residents reviewed for restorative ROM exercises. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, muscle weakness, and tracheostomy status. Review of Resident #76's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/29/23 for restorative passive ROM exercises to all extremities for at least fifteen minutes a day every shift. Review of Resident #76's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two staff assist for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene as well as total dependence of two staff assist for transfers, eating, and toilet use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Resident #76's medical record. This finding affected one resident (#76) of three residents reviewed for the accuracy of the medical records. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, muscle weakness, and tracheostomy status. Review of Resident #76's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/08/23 to shower/bed bath the resident per the resident's father's preference every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; an order dated 03/29/23 for restorative bilateral hand/wrist splint on for six hours and assess skin prior to application, apply at 12:00 A.M. and remove at 6:00 A.M.; an order dated 06/21/23 to cleanse the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG or G tube which was a thin, flexible tube inserted into the stomach wall for nutrition or fluids) with normal saline,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed as written. This had the potential to affect all residents, with the exception of seven residents (#10, #11, #12, #14, #16, #27 and #73) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the menu for breakfast on 08/01/23 revealed a menu of oatmeal or cold cereal, ham, egg, and cheese breakfast omelet muffin and toast. Observation of breakfast on 08/01/23 at 8:40 A.M. revealed scrambled eggs and toast were served. Observation on 08/01/23 at 8:45 A.M. of the menu substitution log revealed no evidence of a substitution to the breakfast meal. Interview on 08/01/223 at 8:48 A.M. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #204 confirmed no substitutions were made to the meal for breakfast on 08/01/23. He confirmed he was not aware scrambled eggs were served in place of the ham, egg, and cheese breakfast omelet. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00144779.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-01 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a variety of foods were offered and failed to honor resident preferences for meals. This affected five residents (#22, #5, #61, #62, and #78) and had the potential to affect all residents, except for seven residents (#10, #11, #12, #14, #16, #27 and #73) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 12/18/22. Diagnoses included sepsis, diabetes, malnutrition, and kidney failure. Review of the diet orders and preferences provided by the facility revealed Resident #22 requested meat with her meal each morning. Review of the menu for the month of July 2023 revealed scrambled eggs were served 15 of 30 days. Interviews on 07/31/23 at 7:16 A.M. with Residents #5, #61, #62, and #78 revealed the same food was always served, especially eggs at breakfast. They didn't eat when they got tired of the same thing being served. Interview and observation on 07/31/23 at 9:16 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with showers received them based on their preference. This affected two residents (#72 and #78) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 01/08/21. Diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis, morbid obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was cognitively intact. She required total assistance of two people for transfers and toilet use, extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and dressing and extensive assistance of one person for hygiene. It was very important for her to choose between a bed bath, tub bath, and shower. Review of the physician's orders for July 2023 revealed Resident #72 was to receive a shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #78's medical record was updated to reflect his most current care needs. This affected one resident (#78) of three residents reviewed for general care and services. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 12/18/21. Diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, pulmonary fibrosis, respiratory failure, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was severely cognitively impaired. He required extensive assistance of one person for toilet use, limited assistance of one person for transfers, dressing, and hygiene, and supervision of one person for bed mobility. Review of the physician's orders for July 2023 revealed Resident #78 required the use of a Hoyer (mechanical) lift with the assistance of two people for transfers. Interview on 07/31/23 at 9:16 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Hoyer (mechanical) lifts were functioning appropriately. This affected two residents (#72 and #90) of three residents reviewed for accidents and had the potential to affect 23 additional residents (#8, #11, #13, #15, #16, #20, #21, #25, #26, #27, #30, #39, #41, #50, #54, #60, #63, #64, #65, #66, #68, #78, and #80) identified by the facility as requiring the use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 01/08/21. Diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis, morbid obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was cognitively intact. She required total assistance of two people for transfers and toilet use, extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and dressing, and extensive assistance of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was staffed with sufficient, competent support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for resident food production and service. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except four residents (Resident #22, #73, #79 and Resident #80) who did not receive nutrition by mouth. The census was 94 residents. Findings include: Observations on 06/06/23 at 11:53 A.M. of the facility kitchen and puree food process revealed [NAME] #618 pureeing meatloaf and green beans. [NAME] #618 placed two large chunks of meatloaf into the food processor, then added approximately eight ounces of beef broth which [NAME] #618 did not measure prior to adding it to the meat. Observations of the pureed meatloaf at the end of the puree process revealed the meatloaf was watery and looked unpalatable. [NAME] #618 began adding an unmeasured amount of thickening powder three different times to thicken puree. Cook #618 moved on to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage/refuse appropriately. This had the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 06/05/23 at 9:08 A.M. with the Dietary Director (DD) of the kitchen's outside dumpster. Surrounding the dumpster was debris including dirty latex gloves, plastic bottles and bags and cardboard boxes. Interview during the observations, the Dietary Director verified the observations and stated he was still educating the staff on proper disposal of garbage.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30, #35, #237 and #440 were treated in a dignified and respectful manner including covering their indwelling catheter drainage bags. This affected four residents (Resident #30, #35, 237, and Resident #440) of seven residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/05/22. Diagnoses included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder system, and retention of the urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/11/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #30 required an indwelling catheter. Review of physician order dated 06/02/23 revealed staff were to maintain indwelling catheter until follow up with urology to remove catheter in office. Observation on 06/05/23 at 1:51 P.M., Resident #30 was observed sitting in the hallways with other residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain all resident rooms in a clean and comfortable manner. This affected six residents (Resident #12, #21, #187, #27, 50, and Resident #10) of 24 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 94. Findings included: On 06/06/23 at 11:33 A.M. observations revealed discolored and dirty flooring in Residents #12 and #21's room, black marks on the room baseboards, water marks from a dark liquid, and orange food particles on the floor. On 06/06/23 at 11:37 A.M. observations revealed discolored and dirty flooring in Residents #187 and #27's room, black marks on the room baseboards, water marks, and a spilled plastic cup with red liquid in it spilling out onto the floor. On 06/06/23 at 11:40 A.M., observations revealed discolored and dirty flooring in Residents #50 and #10's room, black marks on the room baseboards, and scraps of paper on the floor. Observation of the 400 unit on 06/07/23 at 10:50 A.M. revealed all the same observations in the rooms belonging to Resident #10, #12,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete resident assessments within the required times frame for Resident #439. This affected one resident (#439) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #439 revealed an admission date of 05/13/23. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of the esophagus, and hypertension. Review of Resident #439's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments revealed admission and Medicare five-day assessments were initiated with assessment reference dates (ARD) of 05/20/23 but were not completed as required. Further review of Resident #439's admission MDS revealed sections not completed included sections A, B, G, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, S and V. Sections of Resident #439's Medicare five-day assessment that were not completed included sections A, B, G, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P and S. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #643 on 06/08/23 at 8:26 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to complete in a timely manner a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for Resident #82. This affected one resident (#82) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 03/14/23. Diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of right distal lower extremity, acute embolism and thrombosis of right tibial vein, hypertension, and bipolar disorder. Further review of medical record for Resident #82 revealed a smoking risk form was completed on 03/14/23 and identified Resident #82 to be independent with smoking. Review of Resident #82's care plan dated 03/15/23 revealed Resident #82 actively smoked and use of cigarettes since admission was not added to the comprehensive care plan until 06/05/23. Observation on 06/05/23 at 1:17 P.M. revealed Resident #82 had a box of cigarettes on the bed side table. Interview on 06/05/23 at 1:20 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate and physician ordered care and services to promote wound healing for Resident #57. This affected one resident (Resident #57) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 08/30/22 with diagnoses including idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, type two diabetes mellitus, severe morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spinal stenosis, depression, hypothyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and stage three pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed) to penis/scrotum. Resident #57 had a indwelling urinary catheter due to a neurogenic bladder. Review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated for 04/16/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition, was independent with eating, required physical extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for Resident #19. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/05/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, severe persistent asthma and shortness of breath. Review of Resident #19's physician orders for June 2023 revealed an order for continuous oxygen administration at four liters per minute (LPM). Observation on 06/05/23 at 12:00 P.M. revealed Resident #19 was receiving oxygen continuously at three and a half LPM. Interview on 06/05/23 at 12:01 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #658 confirmed Resident #19 was receiving oxygen continuous at three and a half LPM. Observation on 06/06/23 at 3:07 P.M. revealed Resident #19 was receiving oxygen continuously at three and a half LPM. Interview on 06/06/23 at 3:07 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration and wound care for residents #57, #64, and #443, and failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage bag was off the floor for Resident #440. This affected four residents (#57, #64, #443, and #440) of 24 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 06/06/23 at 7:44 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #614 without performing hand hygiene prepared medications for Resident #443. Following preparation of medications, LPN #614 entered the room without performing hand hygiene. LPN #614 handed Resident #443 the medication cup filled with prepared medications. Resident #443 took all medications and LPN #614 threw the empty medication cup in the trash can and walked out of the room without performing hand hygiene. Interview on 06/06/23 at 7:55 A.M. with LPN #614 confirmed no hand hygiene was performed before or after medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to maintain appropriate pest control to prevent infestation. This affected two (Resident #30, #52) of 24 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 94. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/05/22. Diagnoses included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder system, and retention of the urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/11/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 08/02/19. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/22/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Observations on 06/05/23 at 2:35 P.M. revealed Residents #30 and #52 were lying in their beds. Observations revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Manager #553 met the minimum qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents who received food prepared at facility (Residents #31 and # 58 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: A review of Dietary Manager (DM) #553 personal file revealed a hire date of 6/24/19. There was no evidence DM #553 was a Certified Dietary Manager. Interview on 05/04/21 at 9:18 A.M. with DM #553 revealed he had worked at the facility for about 2 years. DM #553 had started Dietary Manager training but did not take all the module tests or the final test to become certified. Dietary Manager was not a certified dietary manager and did not have an associate degree or higher in food service management. There was also no evidence that he had any certification related to food service management. On 05/04/21 at 12:15 P.M. interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) #604 revealed she was not full time at the facility, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient kitchen staff were available to prepare resident meals and snacks, serve resident meals, and maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen. This affected all 87 residents who received meals prepared in the facility kitchen (Residents #31 and # 58 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Initial tour of the kitchen on 05/03/21 from 9:18 A.M. to 9:39 A.M. revealed the following observations, which were confirmed by Dietary Manager (DM) #553 during the initial tour. : • The refrigerator floor was dirty and needed to be swept and mopped. • The freezer had ice buildup going into freezer and there were bags of ice were place directly on the floor. • The shelf above the stove had accumulated grease and dust. • The stovetop needed to be scrubbed. The oven was dirty, and the oven knobs needed to be cleaned. • There was a soiled serving spoon in the utensil drawer. • The can opener had an accumulation of dried food. • The floors and the lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu and food choice alternates were available for residents to review in order to meet the resident's needs and food preferences. This affected one (Resident #194) of one resident reviewed for food choices and meal service, and had the potential to affect all 87 residents (Residents #31 and #58 received nothing by mouth) who received meals prepared at the facility. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Resident #194 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, colostomy status, and malignant neoplasm of the rectum. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/08/21, revealed Resident #194 had intact cognition. The resident was independent for eating, bed mobility, transfers, walking, locomotion, and personal hygiene. The resident was on a Regular diet with no restrictions. Interview on 05/04/21 at 12:02 P.M. with Resident #194…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon resident council's concerns regarding the provision of snacks. This affected 12 (Residents #11, #13, #25, #32, #38, #47, #51, #61, #79, #80, #81, and #83) residents who attended resident council meetings, and had the potential to affect all 87 residents who received food from the facility (Residents #31 and # 58 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: The Resident Council minutes from 02/22/21 revealed Resident #47 had stated the only options for snacks were tea/milk/juice and chips. The resident wanted to have sandwiches and cookies available in addition to what was offered. The Plan of Correction from Dietary for this meeting did not address snacks. The Resident Council meeting minutes from 03/22/21 revealed Residents #11, #51, #79, #80, and #81 agreed the residents were not receiving snacks in the evening except maybe once a week. And when snacks were passed there was not enough to go around. When the residents asked for a snack or something extra with dinner or an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food under sanitary conditions to prevent contamination and potential food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents (Residents #31 and # 58 received nothing by mouth).who were provided meals prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Initial tour of the kitchen on 05/03/21 from 9:18 A.M. to 9:39 A.M. revealed the following observations, which were confirmed by Dietary Manager (DM) #553 during the initial tour : • The refrigerator floor was dirty and needed to be swept and mopped. • The freezer had ice buildup going into freezer and there were bags of ice were place directly on the floor. • The shelf above the stove had accumulated grease and dust. • The stovetop needed to be scrubbed. The oven was dirty, and the oven knobs needed to be cleaned. • There was a soiled serving spoon in the utensil drawer. • The can opener had an accumulation of dried food. • The floors and the lower area of the walls were dirty. Boxes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure staff competencies necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population were included in the facility assessment. This had the potential to affect all 89 facility residents. Findings include: Record review was conducted of the Facility Assessment Tool, updated 04/06/2021, as provided by the Administrator to the survey team. The persons listed as involved in completing the assessment included the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Governing Body Representative, the Medical Director, a respiratory therapist, and two licensed nurses. Within the section titled Staff training, education and competencies there were no competencies listed for each of the departments providing services to the residents. Interview was conducted on 05/11/2021 at 2:30 P.M. with the Corporate Operations Staff Person (COSP) #609 who said she could verify all the nursing services staff had not been competency trained on ventilators and there were vent dependent residents in the facility. Interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon resident council's concern regarding the provision of snacks. This affected 12 (Residents #11, #13, #25, #32, #38, #47, #51, #61, #79, #80, #81, and #83) residents, and had the potential to affect all 87 residents who received food from the facility (Residents #31 and # 58 received nothing by mouth). The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: The Resident Council minutes from 02/22/21 revealed Resident #47 had stated the only options for snacks were tea, milk, juice, and chips. The resident wanted to have sandwiches and cookies available in addition to what was offered. The Plan of Correction from Dietary did not address snacks. The Resident Council meeting minutes from 03/22/21 revealed Residents #11, #51, #79, #80, and #81 agreed the residents were not receiving snacks in the evening except maybe once a week; and when snacks were passed there was not enough to go around. When the residents asked for a snack or something extra with dinner or an alternate for dinner, they were told the kitchen was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility did not ensure adequate cleaning of the resident rooms or common areas. The facility also failed to ensure laundry was washed and dried in a timely manner. This affected 12 (Residents #11, #13, #25, #32, #38, #47, #51, #61, #79, #80, #82, and #83) of 24 residents reviewed for their living environment. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 02/22/2021, 03/22/2021, and 04/26/2021 revealed there were pervasive complaints regarding trash not being emptied sometimes for days; housekeepers not cleaning under beds and tables and not dusting nightstands or dressers; and mopping of the rooms only occurred once a week if at all. Resident #79 complained and Resident # 51 agreed the trash and linen containers were frequently full, and the lids were either off or falling off making the 400 hallway stink. An initial observation was conducted on 05/03/2021 from 9:40 A.M. to 10:11 A.M. of the 400 unit and general facility environment. The 400 unit was the largest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop care plans relative to ventilator care, dialysis care, and psychotropic drug use. This affected four (Residents #54, #59, #65, and #191) of ten residents reviewed for ventilator and dialysis care needs, and unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89 residents. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), acute and chronic respiratory failure, colostomy status, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, and ventilator dependence. The Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Record review revealed no ventilator care plan had been developed. The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview on 05/11/21 at 3:37 P.M. with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessments were completed in a timely manner for five (Residents #9, #22, #30, #70, and #75 ) of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Record review revealed that Residents #9, #22, #30, #70 and #75, who were all identified in their care plans as being at nutritional risk, did not have a nutritional assessment or a dietary progress note in a reasonable time period. Resident #9 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay for bloody vomit and a torn esophagus. His last Nutritional Assessment was dated 08/27/2020. Resident #22 had a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] and his last nutritional assessment was 08/17/2020. This resident was care planned as at nutritional risk. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and care planned at nutritional risk. His last nutritional assessment was 11/30/2020 and there was no evidence of a dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and test tray evaluation, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods to conserve nutritional value and palatablity. This affected 13 residents, including 10 (Residents #4, #7, #16, #21, #22, #41, #71, #75, #76, and #193) of 10 residents who received a pureed diet, as well as Residents #27, #28, and #194. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: 1. On 05/04/2021 at 11:12 A.M., interview with Resident #28 revealed the hot food was usually served warm, not hot. He had asked for cucumber salad, carrot sticks and dip and other fresh fruits and fresh vegetables but had not received any of these items. He stated the food could be a lot better, as it often lacked flavor. Interview on 05/04/21 at 12:02 P.M. and on 05/06/21 at 9:19 A.M. with Resident #194 revealed the food was horrible. Things were overcooked, undercooked, or just looked bad. On 05/06/21 for breakfast his bacon wasn't cooked enough, and the cream of wheat was watery. Interview was conducted on 05/04/2021 at 12:05 P.M. with Resident #27 who said the food was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and pureed food sampling, the facility failed to puree food to the correct consistency. This affected 10 (Residents #4, #7, #16, #21, #22, #41, #71, #75, #76, and #193) of 10 residents who received a pureed diet at the facility. The facilty census was 89 residents. Findings include: On 05/05/21 at 5:05 P.M., observation and tasting of the pureed meatloaf, which had already been prepared and was on the tray-line to be served, revealed the meatloaf was not adequately pureed. When sampled, the meatloaf was not a smooth texture, and was watery, diluted looking, and tasted diluted. Dietary [NAME] #559 and Dietary Manager (DM) #553 tasted the pureed meatloaf and verified it was not fully broken down or adequately thickened. Dietary [NAME] #559 verified the pureed food items were to be of smooth, even consistency and the texture and thickness of pudding. She did not usually sample the pureed foods for taste or texture. On 05/05/21 at 5:12 P.M., interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #553 verified the pureed meatloaf was not pureed adequately or thickened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's hearing aides were replaced timely. This affected one (Resident #73) of one resident reviewed for missing hearing aides. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/19 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #73's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment revealed resident had severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with bed mobility, locomotion, and activities of daily living. Interview on 05/04/21 at 2:35 P.M. of Family Member (FM) #606 revealed Resident #73's hearing aides were lost two years ago and had not been replaced. Interview on 05/11/21 at 12:12 P.M. with Business Office Manager/Social Worker Delegate (BOM/SWD) #512 revealed the facility Social Worker resigned in October 2020 and she was the Social Worker Delegate. BOM/SWD #512 stated in January 2021 she was looking over resident paperwork and noticed there was an open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nutritional progress note was completed and interventions implemented after one resident had a recurring Stage II pressure ulcer found on the right buttock. This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/19 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, protein calorie malnutrition, and functional quadriplegia. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated , 04/28/21 revealed the resident's cognitive status was not assessed, and the resident had total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, and activities of daily living. Resident #4 was transported to the hospital on [DATE] for evaluation of a pressure ulcer. Review of the pressure ulcer risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was at high risk for the development of pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure all nurses were trained regarding ventilator care and related documentation. This had the potential to affect one (Residents #59) of three residents reviewed for ventilator care. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Interview on 05/10/21 at 10:56 A.M. of Respiratory Therapist (RT) #506 revealed he was the Respiratory Therapist for four facilities. This facility was the only one of the four that accommodated residents requiring mechanical ventilation, but the other facilities had residents who required BiPap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) (non-invasive form of therapy for patients suffering from sleep apnea, and delivered pressurized air through a mask to the patient's airways). RT #506 said he provided an inservice on mechanical ventilation for nurses when they were hired by the facility. The Administrator would let him know a nurse was hired and needed an inservice. RT #506 said after the initial training on mechanical ventilation no additional inservices were conducted because there was only one Respiratory Therapist for four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain its dumpster area in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 89 facility residents. Findings include: Observation of the facility's dumpster area on 05/03/21 at 9:31 A.M. revealed one of the two dumpster lids was not closed. Debris including used disposable gloves, boxes, and other garbage was observed on the ground around the bins. Interview on 05/03/21 at 9:31 A.M. with Dietary Manager #553 verified the findings.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care was provided in a manner to prevent cross contamination and infection. This affected one (Resident #63) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/21 and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia. Review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/05/21 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and activities of daily living. Observation on 5/05/21 at 12:38 P.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #502 walking into Resident #63's room to provide incontinence care. She gathered disposable gloves, disposable cleansing wipes, and a clean incontinence brief. The resident had a urinary catheter attached to a drainage bag which was observed as STNA #502 turned Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide palatable food when gelatine was served in a liquid form. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified five residents (#15, #16, #18, #28 and #31) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Interview on 04/11/24 at 11:30 A.M. with Resident #85 revealed no menus were provided to residents, and the food was not good. On 04/11/24 at 12:05 PM. observation of tray line in kitchen revealed a meal of pork chops, mashed potatoes, sauerkraut, and gelatine with diced pears. A test tray was requested. On 04/11/24 at 12:40 P.M. the food cart arrived to the 400-hall. At 12:50 P.M. the test tray was obtained after last the resident's tray was delivered. The gelatine was in a liquid form with diced pears in it. Interview at the time of the observation with Dietary Manager #675 verified the gelatine was not served as it should have been at the time of the test tray. Interview on 04/12/24 at 10:05 A.M. with Resident #69 revealed the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect at all times due to multiple staff members not wearing name badges while on duty in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Interviews were conducted intermittently beginning on 03/04/24 at 3:24 P.M. and continued on 03/05/24, 03/06/24, 03/09/24 and 03/11/24 with Residents #10, #13, #24, #35, #50, #57, #60, #62, #65, #74, #75, #84, #90, #94, #96, #97, and #99 who all revealed the staff working in the facility did not wear name tags so they did not always know who was providing care for them. Interviews conducted with the Administrator on 03/04/24 at 1:30 P.M. and on 03/05/24 at 11:00 A.M. confirmed all staff were to wear their name tags at all times while at work so residents are able to identify them. The Administrator stated he was aware the majority of his staff did not wear their name tags, and he was just happy they showed up for work so he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-06-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to check all employees against the State Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to or on their first day of work/hire to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered in the NAR concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property as required. This had the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for the Administrator revealed a hire date of 06/28/21. The printed evidence of the Administrator being checked against the NAR was not completed until 05/23/22. Review of the personnel file for Activity Assistant (AA) #695 revealed a hire date of 08/04/21. The printed evidence of AA #695 being checked against the NAR was not completed until 06/08/23. Review of the personnel file for Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) #646 revealed a hire date of 12/08/21. The printed evidence of COTA #646 being checked against the NAR had no date of completion. It was unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-06 for 39 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DAVID OBERLANDER — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
QUARTEX LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF7%since 05/18/2018
SAM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF18%since 05/18/2018
FINK, BORUCHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL20%since 07/02/2018
FRIEDMAN, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER20%since 08/15/2018
OBERLANDER, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER10%since 08/15/2018
OBERLANDER, SHOLEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 08/15/2018
NEGINAH ORCHESTRA LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/15/2018
STEINBERG FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/15/2018
STEINBERG, BERNARDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/18/2018
BYF MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/05/2025
RICH, FRANKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2025
VALIQUETTE, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 11%Other / private 67%

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$326per resident / day
operating cost
$9,906per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$399per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365795. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next