The Pavilion At Piketon

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 84.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and individualized interventions to prevent the onset of joint contractures for Resident #38. Actual harm occurred on 01/10/24 when Resident #38, who was admitted to the facility without contractures was assessed to have developed contractures to the third and fourth fingers on the left and right hands which caused pain upon range of motion for the resident due to a lack of interventions to prevent the contractures from occurring. This affected one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 10/12/23 with diagnoses including fracture of lumbar vertebra, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, encephalopathy, osteoarthritis, anemia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of hospital progress notes, review of the facility policy, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was provided adequate and necessary interventions to prevent falls including a fall with injury and failed to ensure post-fall investigations were completed for Resident #69. This affected two residents (Resident #69 and #70) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 84. Actual harm occurred on 11/29/23 when Resident #70, who was moderately cognitively impaired, at risk for falls and care planned to require the use of hipsters (a type of garment worn to help reduce the risk of injuries from a fall, such as hip fractures, through impact-absorbing foam pads over the critical fracture area) sustained a fall with increased pain and subsequent left hip fracture when not wearing the hipsters as care planned. As a result of the fall, the resident was hospitalized and required surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately report an allegation of resident to resident abuse to the proper agencies. This affected one resident (Resident #73) out of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: diabetes mellitis type II, post-traumatic stress disorder, muscle weakness, Bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, altered mental status, dysphagia, lack of coordination, low back pain, alcohol abuse, nicotine dependence, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. This resident is alert and oriented and has minimal cognitive deficits according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/22/25. Review of nursing notes from 4/12/25 at 10:35 A.M. revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurately completed. This affected one resident (#71) out of the six residents reviewed for PASARR during the annual survey. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Record review for Resident #71 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included epilepsy, seizures, mood disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/07/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the residents physicians orders from 06/06/24 through 06/13/24 revealed the resident was ordered Buspar (an anti-anxiety medication) and Sertraline (an anti-depressant medication). Review of the PASARR, signed as completed on 06/13/24, revealed the resident was assessed to have not been ordered any psychotropic medications (anti-anxiety, anti-depressant, anti-psychotic, or mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely podiatry care and services to Resident #3. This affected one (Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 01/17/25 with diagnoses including infection/inflammation reaction due to internal joint prosthesis, osteoarthritis, paint in left knee and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #3 revealed an order received on admission to see podiatry as needed. Review of the Medicare 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance to complete activities of daily living. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #3 revealed no documentation of the condition of Resident #3 toe nails. The progress notes did not indicate Resident #3 had been seen by a podiatrist. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when staff failed to prime an insulin pen for Resident #90. This affected one (Resident #90) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Record review of Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25 with pertinent diagnoses of: sepsis, osteomyelitis, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, acquired absence of right and left lower leg below knee. Review of the 02/06/25 modification of admission and medicare five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is cognitively intact and uses a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of Physician Order dated 02/04/25 revealed Humalog injection solution 100 unit/milliliter (insulin Lispro) inject as per sliding scale if 150-200= 3 units; 201-250= 6 units; 251-300= 9 units; 301-350=12 units; 351-400=15 units; 401+= 18 units notify Nurse Practitioner, subcutaneously before meals and and bedtime for diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, observation, and document review, the facility failed to appropriately clean a blood glucose monitoring machine between patient uses. This affected one (Resident #90) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This had the potential to affect three Residents (Resident #90, #298, and #303) who resided on the E hallway and received blood sugar glucose monitoring. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Record review of Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 02/03/25 with pertinent diagnoses of: sepsis, osteomyelitis, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, acquired absence of right and left lower leg below knee. Review of the 02/06/25 modification of admission and medicare five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the Resident is cognitively intact and uses a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of Physician Order dated 02/04/25 revealed Humalog injection solution 100 unit/milliliter (insulin Lispro) inject as per sliding scale if 150-200= 3 units; 201-250= 6 units; 251-300= 9 units; 301-350=12 units;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure target behaviors were identified and monitored in conjunction with the use of anti-psychotic medications. This affected four (Residents #15, #54, #59, and #76) of 22 facility-identified residents with orders for anti-psychotic medications. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 09/07/23 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, and hallucinations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 12/20/23, revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and received anti-psychotic medication on a routine basis. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #15 revealed an order dated 11/30/23 for Seroquel (an anti-psychotic medication) 300 milligrams (mg) once a day in the evening related to bipolar disorder. Review of the care plan for Resident #15 initiated 09/07/23 revealed the care plan did not include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and functional environment with evidence of poor repair to five rooms that required wall repairs, room heater repairs, and painting. This affected five residents in rooms numbered B-1, B-5, B-8, B-12, and F-64. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Observation on 01/17/24 at 2:30 P.M. of Room B-12 with the Administrator revealed a large hole in the wall between the outside window and the wall heater. Cold air from outside was blowing into the room through the hole. Areas behind both beds had exposed dry wall and other exposed areas from missing paint with large holes in the drywall observed. The vent screen on the heating unit was visibly rusty and unpainted. Observation on 01/17/24 at 2:35 P.M. of Room B-8 with the Administrator revealed there were large, unrepaired holes in the drywall behind both resident beds and holes under the clock and across the room in the middle of the wall. There were some areas of exposed dry wall between the beds. Observation on 01/17/24 at 2:40 P.M. of Room B-5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of significant changes in resident status. This affected one (Resident #78) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an initial admission date of 08/02/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with right-sided hemiplegia, osteoarthritis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, frontal lobe and executive function deficit following CVA, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, migraine, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the plan of care for Resident #78 dated 08/03/23 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired nutritional status related to hypertension, left hip arthroplasty, CVA, gastrostomy without tube feeding, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity and weight loss. Interventions included the following: give medications for hypertension as ordered, monitor vital signs as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of resident assessments. This affected two (Residents #15 and #60) of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 01/19/22 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, acute respiratory failure, aphasia, dysphagia, and severe protein calorie malnutrition Review of the care plan for Resident #60 dated 09/08/23 revealed the resident had an order for hospice care due to terminal diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage. Interventions included the following: allow resident time and the opportunity to discuss his situation as needed, check with resident to see if he/she would like clergy visits, hospice care to be provided by hospice agency of resident's or family's choice, refer family to grieving support groups as needed, resident to be kept comfortable and as pain free as medically possible. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate regarding resident current conditions and diagnoses and were completed when appropriate. This affected two (Residents #25 and #59) of four residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 84. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 08/07/21 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, depression, seizures, hypertension, and anxiety. Further review of the medical record revealed a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis was added for Resident #59 on 05/23/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #59 dated 01/13/23 revealed the resident was severely impaired for cognition. Review of the PASARR document for Resident #59 dated 07/31/21 revealed it did not include any psychiatric diagnoses for the resident. Interview on 01/22/24 at 2:28 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE PAVILION GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH