The Pavilion At Stow For Nursing And Rehabilitatio

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 44.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible to residents. This affected three residents (#11, #12, and #36) of six residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/24 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and glaucoma. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/04/24, revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact and required staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation on 11/06/24 at 8:32 A.M. revealed Resident #11 was lying in bed. The call light was on the floor and not within the resident's reach. 2. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/30/24 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and amaurosis fugax (a painless temporary loss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. This affected Resident's #1, #6, #10, #21, #23 and had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/01/21 and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, and a personal history of urinary tract infections. Review of Resident #21's Quarterly Nutrition Evaluation dated 07/17/23 included Resident #21's diet order was low concentrated sweets, no added salt. Resident #21 was at risk for dehydration. Further review revealed to encourage fluids with and between meals for Resident #21, and might need to prompt, remind, cue and, or present fluids to Resident #21 to assure adequate fluid intake and hydration status. Review of Resident #21's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 36 of 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 04/15/24 at 7:05 A.M. of the kitchen with Dietary Director (DD) #131 revealed two large packages of frozen ground meat were placed in a large sink full of cold water. There was no observation of running water used to thaw the frozen meat. DD #131 confirmed the frozen meat was in the sink of cold water and no water was running into the sink where the frozen meat was. Observation on 04/15/24 at 7:10 A.M. with [NAME] #132 of the cooler in the kitchen revealed a metal rack was placed in the middle of the cooler and a tray on the metal rack full of small plastic containers with pears in most of the cups and cottage cheese in a smaller amount of cups revealed none of the small plastic containers had lids or plastic wrap covering them. Further observation revealed the small plastic containers were undated. [NAME] #132 confirmed the food in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #21 and #23 received water timely and per their preference. This affected two residents (Resident #21 and #23) out of three residents reviewed for receiving water timely and had the potential to affect 12 residents (Resident's #1, #2, #3, #6, #8, #13, #17, #21, #23, #26, #27, #30) residing on the 200 nursing unit. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/01/21 and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, and a personal history of urinary tract infections. Review of Resident #21's Quarterly Nutrition Evaluation dated 07/17/23 included Resident #21's diet order was low concentrated sweets, no added salt. Resident #21 was at risk for dehydration. Further review revealed to encourate fluids with and between meals for Resident #21, and might…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #6's room was sanitary. This affected one resident (Resident #6) out of three residents reviewed for sanitary environment. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/10/20 and diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, anxiety disorder, and vascular dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances. Review of Resident #6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #6 was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Resident #6's upper and lower extremities had impairment on both sides, Resident #6 used a wheelchair, and Resident #6 was dependent for toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #6's care plan with a target date of 05/28/24 included Resident #6 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #10's physician ordered diagnostic test was scheduled timely. This affected one resident (Resident #10) out of three residents reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/24/23 and diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, stage four, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. Review of Resident #10's physician orders dated 07/25/23 revealed Resident #10 would have a sleep study done on 07/27/23 at 8:30 P.M. at a sleep study location. Resident #10 needed to have a shower and be free of any lotions, oils, no caffeine or chocolate after 12:00 P.M. on 07/25/23. No OTC (over the counter) medication, no nail polish. Resident #10 could bring a pillow and wear loose, comfortable clothing. Review of Resident #10's progress notes dated 07/28/23 at 5:39 A.M. revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident's #1 and #10 received incontinence care timely. This affected two residents (Resident's #1 and #10) out of three resident's reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/30/18 and diagnoses included dementia without behavioral, psychotic, mood disturbance and anxiety, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #1's care plan with a target date of 07/11/24 included Resident #1 had episodes of bladder and bowel incontinence related to the need for assistance with ADL's (Activity of Daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen stove/oven in a safe operating manner. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #139) who received enteral nutrition. The census was 39. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 08/14/23 at 10:14 A.M. revealed the facility's primary stove/oven was a six burner flat top with all but one temperature control knob for the stove's top burners missing and one of the oven temperature control knobs was missing. There was a rust-like substance on the oven doors and sides of the stove/oven. Interview on 08/14/23 at 10:15 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #108 confirmed the stove /oven control knobs were missing because the oven had malfunctioned and melted most of the oven control knobs off the stove. Kitchen Manager #108 produced one of the stove control handles that was melted on the bottom half. The Kitchen Manager stated the oven had been malfunctioning so the temperature in the oven would randomly shoot up to 500 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean home like environment for 27 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #14, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #33, #34, #35, and #140) of 39 residents who participated in meals and/or activities outside of their rooms. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Observation on 08/14/23 from 9:30 A.M. through 11:30 A.M. revealed there were four halls where residents resided and traveled on throughout the facility. The nursing station was located in the center leading to each hall. All halls were carpeted including surrounding the nursing station. The carpeting in all halls including surrounding the nurses station was embedded with black dirt, grime, food, and red fluid spills. The carpeting was soiled from the beginning of each carpeted area through the end. Many areas on each hall had large black areas that were so embedded with dirt or other substances, that the fibers of the carpet were no longer visible.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided clean, intact linens for their bed. This affected one resident (Resident #30) of one residents reviewed for linens. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Record review for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23. Diagnosis included pneumonia, pleural effusion, retention of urine, muscle weakness, and need for assistants with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. Resident #30 used a wheelchair for mobility, had an indwelling catheter, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Observation and interview on 08/14/23 at 10:01 A.M. with Resident #30 revealed he had been asking for clean linen. Resident #30 stated that sometimes at night his catheter would leak and his sheets and blankets would get wet with urine. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE PAVILION GROUP — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $521K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH