No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumnwood Care Center

670 E Sr 18, Tiffin, OH 44883 · For profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (419) 447-7151 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 447-7151 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0568)3 actual-harm citations$28,340 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,340 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
433 W Market St · (419) 455-8150 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
240 W Market St · (419) 447-0077 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
41 S Sandusky St · (419) 447-4412 · Call to confirm hours
Park
200 Noble St · (419) 448-5408 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms66.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.9%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.701.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.861.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
28.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 28.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.8%CMS range 32.8–58.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge28.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.6–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-22)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors and further failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This resulted in Actual physical harm and emotional distress for one (#10) resident on 04/19/26 at 10:17 A.M. when Resident #10 verbalized being distraught about not receiving her anti-anxiety medication (Ativan) because the facility had run out and she had not received the evening dose (to be administered between 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M.) on 04/18/26 and the early dose (to be administered between 5:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M.) on 04/19/26, and she was observed to be shaking, tearful and in emotional distress requiring staff intervention. Additionally, a second resident (#19) did not receive her physician prescribed anticonvulsant medication (Phenobarbital) for the evening doses on 04/17/26 and 04/18/26 (to be administered between 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M.), and the morning dose (to be administered between 5:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M.) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication order was complete and accurate and further failed to ensure the medication order was transcribed correctly to make certain Resident #10 was administered the correct medication. Actual Harm occurred when an incomplete verbal order for a critically low potassium level (2.7 milliequivalents per liter [mEq/L] with normal potassium blood serum measuring between 3.5 and 5.5 mEq/L) was transcribed and medication administered inaccurately, resulting in Resident #10 receiving a medication to remove potassium from the blood rather than a medication to replace potassium (low potassium could result in cardiac arrhythmia, numbness, tingling, muscle weakness, spasms, and or muscle damage). Resident #10 required hospital treatment, additional laboratory testing and the replacement of potassium with 40 milliequivalents (mEq) administered orally and 10 mEq intravenously. This affected one (#10) of three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, review of the hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure early identification of a change in the resident's condition. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #41, who was taking an anticoagulant medication, experienced a moderate amount of blood in the stool during a bowel movement. A thorough assessment and immediate notification to the physician was not completed. Subsequently, approximately 33 hours later the resident was hospitalized and received three units of packed red blood cells for a critical low hemoglobin level. This affected one (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed for anticoagulant therapy. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic aneurysm without rupture and most currently post hemorrhagic anemia, and gastrointestinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-04-22 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure state survey results were available without having to request them. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure notice of the availability of the state survey results were posted in prominent and accessible areas for the residents/public. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Interview on 04/21/26 at 8:38 A.M. with Resident's #15, #19, #25, and #70 revealed they were not aware where the state survey results could be found.Observation on 04/21/26 at 9:45 A.M. of the front lobby, nurses station between the 100 and 200 halls, both dining rooms, the nurse's station between the 300 and 600 halls, and all resident room hallways in the facility revealed no signage posted regarding the location of the state survey results.Interview on 04/21/26 at 9:50 A.M. with Receptionist #280 verified she was unaware of where the state survey results were located and was unaware of any signage posted in the facility regarding the location of the state survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0641 — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), review of the National Institute of Health website, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded. This affected three residents (#12, #52, and #76) and had the potential to affect six residents (#12, #14, #30, #47, #52, #76) the facility identified as being invasive ventilator dependent. The facility census was 88.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/16/12. Diagnoses included paraplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea, and dependence on respirator.Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required an invasive mechanical ventilator (Section O, question F1 of the assessment).Review of Resident #12's most recent care plan revealed the resident had altered respiratory status, difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards. This had the potential to affected all facility residents. The facility census was 88.Findings include:1. Observation 04/19/26 at 8:22 A.M. of the medication storage cart for the 300-hall revealed an opened 24-ounce bottle of chocolate syrup approximately two-thirds empty, an opened 16-ounce bottle of Geri-Tussin (a liquid cough medicine), lot number F25103, approximately one-half empty, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 05/27, and an opened 16-ounce bottle of Milk of Magnesia, lot number DMR0388, approximately one-half empty, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 05/27 all without an open dates. Additionally, in the medication cart there was one three milliliter (mL) Lantus (a long acting insulin) pen, lot number 6F0555A, labeled for Resident #37, approximately one-half empty, with a manufacturer's expiration date of 09/30/28, the pen was labeled as opened on 03/14/26. Concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of the test tray, and policy review, the facility failed to provide palatable food. This had the potential to affect 87 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#1) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 12:13 P.M. revealed a test tray to be prepared in the kitchen. The test tray included ravioli in a red sauce, green beans, a breadstick, and Jello poke cake per the menu. At 12:14 P.M. the test tray was placed on the Memory Care meal cart. At 12:16 P.M. the Memory Care meal cart left the kitchen. At 12:18 P.M. the meal cart arrived at the Memory Care unit. At 12:19 P.M. two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) began to pass the meal trays to the Memory Care unit residents. At 12:25 P.M. the final tray on the meal tray cart was passed.Observation on 04/19/26 at 12:30 P.M. of the test tray revealed a colorful and appetizing appearance however the ravioli was cold and lacked flavor, the green beans were cold, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents on the Memory Care unit preferences regarding meals were identified and honored. This affected 15 residents (#9, #11, #16, #18, #33, #35, #48, #55, #56, #58, #60, #61, #76, #81, and #83) who resided on the Memory Care unit and received food from the kitchen. The census was 88.Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 11:30 A.M. of meal service and meal tray preparation for the meal trays for the 100, 200, 300 and 400 halls revealed each resident's meal ticket contained the resident's name, diet order, allergies, preferences, dislikes and the alternate food items selected for the meal.Continued observation on 04/19/26 at 12:02 P.M. of meal service and meal tray preparation for the Memory Care unit revealed the Memory Care unit resident meal tray tickets contained the resident's name, diet order, and allergies. The meal ticket did not outline resident preferences, dislikes or alternate food items.Interview on 04/19/26 at 12:04 P.M. with Dietary Manager #181 verified the residents on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure snacks were available and offered to residents. This had the potential to affect 87 residents who were able to receive snacks. The facility identified one resident (#1) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Interview with Resident #31 on 04/19/26 at 9:25 A.M. revealed the resident felt meals were served too close together. Resident #31 stated dinner was served at 4:00 P.M. and no snacks were offered or served in the evening, which left her hungry by breakfast. Interview on 04/21/26 at 8:38 A.M. with Residents #15, #19, #25, and #70 during the Resident Council meeting revealed Resident #15 and Resident #70 had never been offered snacks by the staff. Resident #25 stated if he wanted a snack, he had to ask for it, and the staff would go and get the snack. Resident #19 stated the staff did not offer them evening snacks.Interview on 04/21/26 at 10:01 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #278 verified the CNAs were responsible for the snacks being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food that was open was properly stored. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure eggs that were served undercooked were pasteurized. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents who received food from the kitchen, the facility identified one resident (#1) as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings include:Observation on 04/19/26 at 8:19 A.M. of reach in freezer #1 revealed sausage links, zucchini, two bags of biscuits, hash browns, Tator tots, chicken wings, and garlic bread all to be opened and undated.Interview on 04/19/26 at 8:22 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #181 verified the sausage links, zucchini, two bags of biscuits, hash browns, Tator tots, chicken wings, and garlic bread were open in reach in freezer #1 and were undated.Observation with concurrent interview with DM #181 on 04/19/26 at 8:24 A.M. verified in the walk in refrigerator the eggs used in the facility were not pasteurized. Further observation with concurrent interview with DM #181of the walk in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-04-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the exterminator reports, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure effective pest control. This had the potential to affect 15 residents (#9, #11, #16, #18, #33, #35, #48, #55, #56, #58, #60, #61, #76, #81, and #83) residing on the Memory Care unit. The census was 88.Findings include:Observation on 04/21/26 at 10:11 A.M. of the Memory Care snack cabinet revealed mouse droppings to be on the shelves and at the bottom of the cabinet. Furthermore, a loaf of bread contained in the cabinet had a hole in the bag that appeared to be chewed through and some of the loaf of bread appeared to have small bite marks.Interview on 04/21/26 at 10:21 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #307 verified there were approximately 42 mouse droppings in the Memory Care snack cabinet. LPN #307 was unsure how long the mouse dropping had been in the cabinet and was not aware of when the last time the snacks from the cabinet were given to the residents.Review of the exterminator report dated 03/11/26 revealed the facility had treated for rats/mice in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure a resident who was determined unable to self-administer medications did not self-administer nebulizer treatments. This affected one (#04) of one resident reviewed for medication self-administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include:Review of Resident #04's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/09/25. Diagnoses included acute renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and schizophrenia.Review of Resident #04's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognitive function was intact and that the resident required set up or clean up assistance for eating.Review of Resident #04's most recent care plan revealed the resident suffered from schizophrenia which affected the thought process. Medications were to be administered as ordered.Review of Resident #04's physician order for Ipratropium - Albuterol solution 0.5-2.5 milligrams (mg) per three milligrams solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely physician notification of medication unavailability for two residents (#10 and #19) of three residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 88.Findings include:1. Review Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/25, diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, asthma, suicidal ideations, and unspecified convulsions.Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/09/26 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #10's cognition was intact. Resident #10 did not have any communication issues and was coded as not having displayed any behaviors during the 14 days of the assessment period. Resident #10 received scheduled antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Review of Resident #10's care plans revealed the resident had an active care plan in place for being at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received proper grooming. This affected two (#56, #85) of four residents reviewed for assistance of daily living (ADL) care. The facility identified all residents residing in the facility as being dependent for ADL care. The facility census was 88.Findings include:Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/08/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, suicidal ideations, anxiety, and amaurosis fugax (vision loss).Review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a low cognitive function and required partial to moderate assistance regarding personal hygiene and showering.Review of Resident #56's most recent care plan revealed the resident suffered from an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care and mobility performance deficit related to severe cognitive impairment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide bed hold notice to residents being sent to the hospital. This affected one (#6) of three residents reviewed for bed hold notices. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 04/18/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage III, low back pain, and malignant neoplasm of parotid gland. Review of the census line revealed Resident #6 was private pay.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact.Review of the nursing note dated 07/03/25 at 3:01 P.M. revealed Resident #6 was found on the floor of her bathroom lying on her side in front of the toilet. The resident was screaming out in pain during the transfer. The Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) was notified and a new order received to send the resident to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation.The nursing note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 77 residents in the facility, Resident #52 received no food by mouth and thus received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation on 12/09/24 at 8:35 A.M. of the kitchen found Dietary Staff (DS) #534 was running dishes through the dishwasher. Coinciding interview with DS #534 revealed she was not aware if the dishwasher was a high temperature or chemical machine. Review of the dishwasher found it was labeled as a high temperature machine with the final rinse temperature should be 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observation of the temperature gauge as DS #534 ran the dishwasher found it reached 164 degrees F for the wash and the gauge did not move off the 100 degree mark for the rinse. Observation and coinciding interview on 12/09/24 at 8:37 A.M. with Dietary Director (DD) #601 found when the dishwasher was run again the rinse gauge continued to read 100 degrees and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the manufactures instructions for the dishwasher, review of dishwasher temperature logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine was maintained in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect 77 residents in the facility, Resident #52 received no food by mouth and no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observation on 12/09/24 at 8:35 A.M. of the kitchen found Dietary Staff (DS) #534 was running dishes through the dishwasher. Coinciding interview with DS #534 revealed she was not aware if the dishwasher was a high temperature or chemical machine. Review of the dishwasher found it was labeled as a high temperature machine with a final rinse temperature noted to be 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observation of the temperature gauge as DS #534 ran the dishwasher found it reached 164 degrees F for the wash and the gauge did not move off the 100 degree mark for the rinse. Observation and coinciding interview on 12/09/24 at 8:37 A.M. with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dryers in the facility laundry room were cleaned appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a well-maintained environment. This affected two residents (Resident #24 and Resident #68) of two residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/10/24 at 12:02 P.M. revealed the walk-in vent area behind the facility's three industrial dryers were covered in lint. An interview on 12/10/24 at 12:02 P.M. with Laundry #502 verified these findings. An interview on 12/10/24 at 12:02 P.M. with Laundry #502 revealed Maintenance Supervisor #535 cleans the lint once per year. 2. Observation of Residents #24 and #68 room on 12/09/24 at 9:45 A.M. revealed above Resident #24's bed was a large brown stain on the ceiling. Interview with Residents #24 and #68 on 12/09/24 at 10:35 A.M. verified their ceiling had large brown stain. They stated the stain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure shower preferences were honored. This affected one (#18) of one resident reviewed for showers. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 04/29/19. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, and depressive disorder. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for showers and bathing. Review of the plan of care initiated 08/02/24 revealed the resident's personalized care preferences included a shower three times per week. The resident required physical assistance to total dependence for bathing and shower transfers with two staff with the mechanical lift. Review of the shower schedule revealed Resident #18 was scheduled for showers three times per week…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided quarterly statements for their personal funds. This affected one (#20) of one resident reviewed for personal funds. The facility identified 54 residents with personal funds accounts. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission dated of 09/11/17. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the personal fund authorization form dated 07/09/18 revealed the resident authorized the facility to manage her personal fund account. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation the resident was provided with quarterly statements for personal funds. Interview on 12/09/24 at 9:34 A.M., Resident #20 revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician and resident representative of a resident change in condition. This affected one (Resident #30) of two residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 78. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/05/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, dementia, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of a nurses note dated 11/17/24 at 1:54 P.M. revealed the resident stated this morning she had gotten up in the middle of the night and moved her right ankle wrong. The resident complained of pain to the right ankle and foot. No swelling or bruising noted. The resident had two elastic bandages wrapping the ankle and the nurse removed one and rewrapped one so it was not too tight. The nurse got a leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels in the dining room on the secured unit. This affected one resident (#59) and had the potential to affect the 12 residents who resided on the secured unit. The facility census was 78. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and dementia. Review of Resident #59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating Resident #59 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #59 required maximal assistance with toilet use, dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #59 required moderate assistance with bathing and supervision with eating. Resident #59 displayed rejection of care behaviors one to three days during the review period and wandering behaviors four to six days during the review period. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was complete with current resident condition. This affected one (Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/11/17. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, ataxia, Parkinson's, schizoaffective, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. The resident required maximum assistance for lower body dressing and required oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed a physician's order for [NAME] hose (compression stockings) to be applied in the morning and removed at bedtime. Size regular medium. Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed no goals or interventions in place for the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#20) was provided compression stockings as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident observed for compression stockings. The facility census was 78. Findings included: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/11/17. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, ataxia, Parkinson's, schizoaffective, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. The resident required maximum assistance for lower body dressing and required oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed the resident required diuretic therapy. Interventions included to watch for lower extremity swelling. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed a physician's order for [NAME] hose (compression stockings) to be applied in the morning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had their tube feed running at the ordered rate. This affected one resident (#52) of one resident reviewed. The facility identified one resident who received nutrition via tube feeding in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/31/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dysphagia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, seizures, and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight indicating Resident #52 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #52 required maximal assistance with toilet use, dressing, bathing, and mobility. Resident #52 had a feeding tube and received 51% or more of his total calories through the tube feeding. Resident #52 displayed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, revealed the facility failed to ensure medical staff completed accurate documentation regarding a resident's compression stocking application. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 78. Findings included: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/11/17. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, ataxia, Parkinson's, schizoaffective, and lymphedema. Review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed an intact cognition. The resident required maximum assistance for lower body dressing. Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed the resident required diuretic therapy. Interventions included to watch for lower extremity swelling. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed a physician's order for [NAME] hose (compression stockings) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's catheter collection bags were maintained off the floor and in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected two residents (#56 and #39) of two residents reviewed with indwelling catheters. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected two residents (#56 and #69). The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/07/24. Diagnoses included urethral syndrome, urinary retention, chronic kidney disease, and breast and lung cancer. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed she had intact cognitive function and required an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of Resident #39's most recent care plan revealed the resident required enhanced barrier precautions related to increased risk for multidrug-resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, cardiologist progress notes, policy review, and review of facility corrective action, the facility failed to adequately monitor the placement of a resident's cardiac defibrillator external heart monitor. This affected one (#57) of one resident reviewed for implanted defibrillators. The facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/02/22. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and an implanted defibrillator. Review of Resident #57's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderately impaired cognitive level and required a maximum assist for transfers. Review of Resident #57's most recent care plan revealed he had a cardiac diagnosis which required monitoring, medications, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interview, interview with the Long Term Care Ombudsman, interview with hospital staff, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the required documentation when a resident was initially transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment and the resident was later discharged from the facility. The facility also failed to ensure there was necessary reasons to transfer the resident to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. Resident #76 was transferred to an acute, inpatient, geriatric psychiatric facility on [DATE] on a 72-hour involuntary hold placed by Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #210. Resident #76 was previously hospitalized at the same facility from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on family and staff interview, interview with hospital staff, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident's representative of the appropriate written notice upon discharge. This affected one (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 01/22/22. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. Resident #76 was transferred to an acute, inpatient, geriatric psychiatric facility on 05/24/24 on a 72-hour involuntary hold placed by Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #210. Review of Resident #76's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 discharge return anticipated assessment, dated 05/24/24, revealed the resident was identified with a memory problem and required modified independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of Resident #76's interdisciplinary progress notes revealed a note dated 05/24/24 at 2:48 P.M. which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interview, interview with the Long Term Care Ombudsman, interview with hospital staff, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to allow Resident #76 to return to the facility following a therapeutic leave to an acute, inpatient, geriatric psychiatric facility. This affected one (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. Resident #76 was transferred to an acute, inpatient, geriatric psychiatric facility on [DATE] on a 72-hour involuntary hold placed by Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #210. Resident #76 was previously hospitalized at the same facility from [DATE] to [DATE]. Review of Resident #76's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 discharge return anticipated assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/12/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), osteoarthritis, and muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition and displayed no rejection of care. Review of the Morse Fall Scale (assessment tool that predicts the likelihood that a patient/resident will fall) dated 10/12/23 revealed Resident #11 was at high risk for falls. The Morse Fall Scale dated 10/15/23 revealed Resident #11 was at moderate risk for falls. Review of the care plan updated 11/24/23 revealed Resident #11 was at risk for falls. Interventions included a low bed with a floor mat. Review of a nurse's progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the staff schedules, and review of the facility unit staffing guidelines, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff on the secured memory care unit to provide resident care. This directly affected two residents (#64 and #66) and had the potential to affect all 12 residents (#09, #12, #13, #19, #23, #54, #55, #59, #60, #63, #64 and #66) out of 12 residents residing on the secured memory care unit. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, hypertension, interstitial pulmonary disease, Raynaud's syndrome, spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, and osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods kept in the refrigerator and freezer on the memory care unit were properly stored, labeled, and dated. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (#09, #12, #13, #19, #23, #54, #55, #59, #60, #63, #64 and #66) out of 12 residents residing on the secured memory care unit. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Observation on 09/26/22 at 9:54 A.M. of the kitchen area on the memory care unit revealed a reach in refrigerator and freezer combination. The refrigerator compartment revealed a container of applesauce dated 08/30/22, an undated and unlabeled package of luncheon meat in a plastic bag, an undated and unlabeled half-full pitcher of juice, a red cup with a lid containing an unknown liquid, undated and unlabeled, and a loosely covered bowel of butter with toast crumbs noted on the butter, undated and unlabeled. Additional observations revealed the refrigerator grates had food particles and dirt build-up and a sticky substance was spilled on the inside of the refrigerator.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and common areas were kept in good repair. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents of the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/26/22 at 9:41 A.M. of Resident #64's room revealed an area, approximately two inches in diameter, on the wall near the call light box of exposed, unpainted, drywall; two areas, one on each side of the window, approximately three inches long and a half inch wide of exposed, unpainted drywall; and a quarter size and two dime size areas of exposed, unpainted drywall on the wall near the thermostat. Interview on 09/26/22 at 9:44 A.M., the State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #482 verified the above findings. STNA #482 stated all staff were able to complete work orders for maintenance. STNA #482 was uncertain if a work order had been completed for the damage to Resident #64's room walls. 2 Observation on 09/29/22 at 8:36 A.M. of the sunroom, located on the 200 hall, revealed a ceiling crack, approximately 10 feet long, along with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure notification was made to the physician, dietician, and the resident representative of a significant weight loss. This affected two residents (#04 and #34) out of two residents reviewed for notification of change in status. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, and other intervertebral disc degeneration. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, toilet use, and dressing, required supervision with eating and had weight loss of 5 percent (%) or more in the past month and was not on a prescribed weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy for one resident (#40) out of three reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spastic hemiplegia, epilepsy, falls, and foot drop. Review of the 08/04/22 annual minimum data set (MDS) revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors or refusals of care, required extensive assist with bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene and was dependent for on staff for transfers. Resident #40 was coded as not having a pressure ulcer. Observation of incontinence care provided by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #502 and #503 on 09/28/22 at 10:02 A.M. revealed Resident #40's bed was against the wall and the resident's head of the bed was facing the outside wall where the room window was located. The staff laid the resident in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care to include a resident's pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#64) out of 18 records reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, hypertension, interstitial pulmonary disease, Raynaud's syndrome, spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, and osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), was a risk for pressure ulcers and had one stage II pressure ulcer. Review of a Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk dated 08/19/22 revealed Resident #64 had a score of 20, indicating the Resident was at high risk for developing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed ensure timely revision of the care plan. This affected one resident (#40) out of one reviewed for position/mobility out of 18 care plans reviewed. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spastic hemiplegia, epilepsy, falls, and foot drop. Review of the 08/04/22 annual minimum data set revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors or refusals of care, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for transfers. A splint device was coded as zero days. Review of the care plans revealed Resident #40 had a care plan for his activities of daily living which included an intervention of a splint for the left hand which the resident would refuse to wear. The resident care plan had no documentation for the use of an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) shower documentation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers as scheduled. This affected two residents (#64 and #66) out of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, hypertension, interstitial pulmonary disease, Raynaud's syndrome, spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy, and osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and physical help in bathing. Review of a plan of care focus area initiated 02/25/22 revealed Resident #64 was unable to carry out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure planned fall interventions were implemented. This affected two residents (#04 and #37) out of four resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, long-term use of insulin, obstructive sleep apnea, unspecified psychosis, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #37's fall risk assessments dated 03/22/20, 06/21/20, 09/05/20, 11/30/20, 02/27/21, 05/30/21, 08/29/21, 08/30/21, 11/29/21, 11/30/21, 02/26/22, 05/29/22, 07/16/22, 07/30/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medial record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure weights were monitored per facility policy and failed to track meal intakes as care planned. This affected one (#4) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. In addition, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained per physician order. This affected one (#34) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, and other intervertebral disc degeneration. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, toilet use, and dressing, required supervision with eating and had weight loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was applied per physician order. This affected one resident (#33) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced segmental fracture of shaft of humerus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, Parkinson's disease, depression, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident used oxygen. Review of Resident #33's physician orders for September 2022 identified orders for oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula, every shift, and oxygen at two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely act on pharmacy recommendations. This affected two residents (#28 and #03) out of eight residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus type two. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact, had behaviors directed toward others four to six days of the review period, required extensive assistance with dressing, limited assist with toilet use and bed mobility and supervision with transfers, eating, and personal hygiene. Resident #28 had seven days of injections: insulin, an antipsychotic, an antidepressant, an antianxiety, a diuretic and an opioid medication. The last gradual dose reduction was attempted on 12/28/21 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure access and availability of therapy records in a resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#04) out of one resident reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, and other intervertebral disc degeneration. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with transfers, personal hygiene, toilet use, and dressing, and had one fall with no major injury. Review of the plan of care focus area revised 06/28/22 revealed Resident #04 was at risk for falls related to side effects of medication, unsteady gait, decreased balance and medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,340 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $28,340 — penalty dated 2026-04-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GARDEN SPRINGS HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OHEADS OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/02/2025
RAP 118 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/20/2024
YFR EQUITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 06/20/2024
FRIEDMAN, MATISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/20/2024
MAHILNITSKI, ILYAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF15%since 06/20/2024
STRAUSS, JENNIFERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/20/2024
BARENBAUM, ALYSSAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/20/2024
FRIEDMAN, GITTYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/20/2024
AKERS, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2024
FRANKLIN, NUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 4%Other / private 23%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$317per resident / day
operating cost
$9,636per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365380. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next