Warren Nursing & Rehab
2473 North Rd NE, Warren, OH 44483 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (330) 372-2251 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,137 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 30.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.9% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 31.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.1%CMS range 37.9–71.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.9–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 31.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.4–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.69 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed medical record review, review of the facility water management plan and maintenance logs, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance related to legionella, review of infection control tracking, and interviews with staff and representatives from the Local Health Department (LHD), the facility failed to develop, implement and follow a comprehensive and effective infection control/water management plan and remediation program to prevent the risk of legionella growth and spread in the water supply. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death beginning on [DATE] when Resident #76, who was bed ridden, had chronic lung disease, was dependent on a mechanical ventilator to breath, and had not left the facility for over 14 days prior to hospitalization, became unresponsive and in respiratory distress requiring emergency transfer to the hospital where she was diagnosed with septic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent and/or promote pressure ulcer healing. The facility failed to ensure pressure-relieving equipment was functioning as intended, failed to ensure nutritional interventions were initiated, and failed to ensure treatments were implemented and maintained as ordered to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers for Residents #10, #11, #25, #27, #44, and #58. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 11/19/25 when Resident #10 who was severely cognitively impaired and at high risk for pressure ulcer development with a history of pressure ulcers developed a deep tissue injury (DTI)/unstageable (full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer to the thoracic spine (mid-back) as a result of a malfunctioning low air loss (LAL) mattress. Actual Harm occurred on 12/09/25 when Resident #27 who was severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely care and services to treat Resident #38's urinary tract infection (UTI).Actual harm occurred on 10/13/25 when Resident #38, who had a history of UTI and had been stating she felt like she had UTI symptoms of frequent urination and burning a couple days prior, was ordered a urine analysis (UA) test by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #842 to assess for UTI and that order was not entered into the physician orders until 10/15/25 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #341. On 10/16/25 Resident #16 was hospitalized prior to completion of the UA test, and Resident #38 was diagnosed at the hospital with altered mental status, acute UTI, bacteremia (bacteria in the blood) and acute kidney injury and was treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics for the infection. Resident #38 remained in the hospital for treatment until returning to the facility on [DATE] where IV antibiotics were continued for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess wounds and obtain appropriate treatment orders upon re-admission from the hospital, failed to ensure wound care supplies were available, and/or failed to complete pressure ulcer treatments as ordered by the physician for Residents #60, #7, and #79. Actual Harm occurred on 04/11/24 when Resident #60, who was severely cogntively impaired, dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, at risk for pressure ulcer development and had a history of pressure ulcers, was found per Wound Physician #675 to have an unstageable (full-thickness pressure ulcer in which the base was obscured by slough and/ or eschar (dead skin) pressure ulcer to the left sacrum. The facility failed to ensure systems and interventions were in place to prevent the development of the pressure ulcer and to identify the pressure ulcer prior to it being identified as an unstageable ulcer. In addition, staff failed to consistently assess,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, ensure timely and accurate assessments were completed, ensure treatments were completed as ordered and/or to ensure staff were knowledgeable of care planned interventions for Resident #76 and Resident #82. Actual Harm occurred on 02/22/24 when Resident #82 who required substantial to maximum staff assistance with bed mobility and was totally dependent on staff with transfers and toileting was found per Wound Physician #703 progress note to have an unstageable (full-thickness pressure ulcer in which the base was obscured by slough and/ or eschar (dead skin) pressure ulcer to his right buttock and an unstageable deep tissue pressure ulcer to his left heel (this was the first time these two areas were documented per the medical record) eight days after admission. The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary garbage storage area. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Observation on 12/10/25 at 8:19 A.M. of the dumpsters revealed one large trash bag torn open and on the ground to the left of the dumpsters. There were two large trash bags on the ground between the two dumpsters with trash including used gloves, straws, and plastic silverware lying on the ground.Interview on 12/10/25 at 8:25 A.M. with the Administrator verified the trash bags and trash on the ground around the dumpster area.Review of the facility policy tilted Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, dated October 2022, revealed storage areas would be kept clean at all times and would not constitute a nuisance, and outside dumpsters would be free of surrounding litter.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, review of employee personnel files, and review of facility infection surveillance including infection control logs and maps, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist acquired their Infection Prevention Certificate prior to assuming the role as Infection Preventionist and failed to complete accurate infection control logs and maps. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Review of the Infection Preventionist (IP) Registered Nurse (RN) #431 employee file revealed a hire date of 06/30/25 with roles indicated as the Infection Preventionist and Wound Care Nurse. Review of IP RN #431's Infection Preventionist certificate revealed they received their certificate on 08/30/25. Review of the facility infection control logs and surveillance map dated October 2025 revealed Resident #25's Clostridium Difficile (C-diff) infection dated 10/14/25 was not documented on either the log or map. Review of the facility infection control logs and surveillance map dated November 2025 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents.Findings include:An observation on 11/20/25 at 1:20 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #368 revealed a large ceiling stain near resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on the Aspen unit. Interview with MS #368 at the time of the observation revealed the stain was from a roof leak about a month ago. When asked if water got inside the air duct work he stated yes, and stated the facility had a company come replace the duct work. Continued observation at 1:22 P.M. with MS #368 inside of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a large amount of lint and signs of mold in the ceiling vent. MS #368 verified the findings at the time of the observation. An observation was conducted on 11/20/25 at 1:24 P.M. of the attic on the even room number side of the Aspen unit to inspect the stained area. Observation revealed duct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure complete orientation of 14 newly hired Certified Nursing Assistants. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 72.Findings include:On 12/18/25 at 2:33 P.M. a review of personnel files was conducted with Human Resource Director (HRD) #443.A review of the personnel file for Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #436 revealed a date of hire (DOH) of 09/09/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review of the personnel file for CNA #450 revealed a DOH of 10/23/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review of the personnel file for CNA #440 revealed a DOH of 09/18/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review of the personnel file for CNA #439 revealed a DOH of 09/09/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of maintenance documents and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain adequate room temperatures in the common area/dining room and resident rooms. This affected six residents (#15, #34, #48, #50, #52 and #69), and had the potential to affect 26 residents (#5, #6, #7, #8, #16, #23, #24, #26, #32, #36, #39, #43, #46, #47, #48, #51, #53, #56, #57, #59, #60, #66, #68, #69, #70 and #93) who used the common area/dining room . The facility census was 72.Findings include:Interview on 11/26/25 at 8:10 A.M. with Resident #15 complained the common area was so cold last week he had to stay in his room because his room was warmer.Interview on 11/26/25 at 8:15 A.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #840 stated the building was so cold last week, the residents refused to receive showers.Interview on 11/26/25 at 8:25 A.M. with Resident #48 complained the common area was so cold he had to eat lunch in his room and did not like to feel that cold.Interview on 11/26/25 at 8:26 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #431 verified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional recommendations were implemented in a timely manner for Residents #11, #21, and #25. Additionally, the facility failed to meet estimated energy needs for Resident #2 who was dependent on enteral (tube) feeding for nutrition. Additionally, the facility failed to evaluate Resident #33 (who was identified to be a high nutritional risk) on a monthly basis. The facility identified 15 current residents who required enteral feeding. This affected five residents (#2, #11, #21, #25, and #33) of 13 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/18/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with ventilator dependence, tracheostomy, gastrostomy status, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, anxiety, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic congestive heart failure, enterocolitis, cystitis, hypotension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, review of the dialysis agreement and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain shared communication and collaboration with the dialysis clinic regarding dialysis care and services. This affected six residents (#02, #21, #29, #44, #63, and #67) of eight residents reviewed for dialysis and had the potential to affect six additional residents (#17, #90, #33, #10, #62, #71) identified by the facility as also receiving dialysis. The facility census was 72.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #02 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on a ventilator, dysphagia, pulmonary hypertension, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and gastrostomy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of two out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to remove expired wound and tracheostomy care supplies and enteral feeding formula from storage to prevent usage and failed to securely store medications for Residents #30 and #51. This affected two residents (#30 and #51) and had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:1. Observation on [DATE] at 11:04 A.M. of Resident #51 revealed the resident was lying in bed. On the overbed table was a clear medication administration cup with four tablets of varying size and one capsule. Interview at the time of the observation with Resident #51 revealed she was not sure how long the pills had been there. Interview at the time of the observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #380 verified the pills and capsule inside the medication cup were left on the resident's bedside table. The nurse stated he did not leave the pills at the bedside and believed they were from the previous shift.Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sugar-free condiments were available in accordance with the planned consistent carbohydrate, limited concentrated sweets menu. This had the potential to affect 10 residents (Resident #17, #29, #32, #34, #36, #03, #05, #65, #68, #71) the facility identified as having a physician order for consistent carbohydrate, low concentrated sweets diet of 57 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified 15 residents (Resident #90, #18, #21, #22, #25, #27, #02, #10, #41, #42, #11, #58, #01, #62, #67) who did not eat by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 72.Findings include: An interview on 12/17/25 at 1:30 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #316 revealed LPN #316 had a concern about resident blood sugars with the residents with diabetes. LPN #316 stated diabetic residents used to receive sugar-free condiments but recently did not receive sugar-free syrup or sugar-free jelly any more on the meal trays and instead were being served regular jelly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not serve food in a manner consistent with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 35 residents (#3, #8, #9,#12, #13, #14, #16, #19, #23, #26, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #38, #44, #47, #48, #49, #51, #50, #55, #56, #57, #63, #64, #65, #66, #83, and #84) receiving meals from the second floor kitchenette out of 57 residents who received meals from the facility. The facility identified 15 residents (Resident #90, #18, #21, #22, #25, #27, #02, #10, #41, #42, #11, #58, #01, #62, #67) who did not eat by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 72.Findings include:An observation was conducted on 12/18/25 at 5:00 P.M. of the evening meal service on the second floor and revealed an open to air food transport cart was being pushed off the elevator towards the kitchenette near the common areas dining room. On the cart were three full trays of mini pizza that were not covered during transport. An interview on 12/18/25 at 5:05 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #317 verified the uncovered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident consents or declinations were obtained for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, and the facility failed to document site of administration, lot number, and expiration dates for administered vaccines. This affected five residents (Resident #5, #20, #25, #29, and #38) of seven residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 72.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/20. Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder, hypertension, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease stage III.Review of Resident #5's influenza and pneumococcal vaccination consent form dated 09/17/25 revealed the resident consented to both vaccinations.Review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2025 revealed the resident received her influenza vaccination on 09/23/25 and she received her pneumococcal vaccination on 09/24/25; however, there was no required documentation such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident consent or declinations were obtained for COVID-19 vaccinations. This affected five residents (Resident #5, #20, #25, #29, and #38) of seven residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 72.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/20. Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder, hypertension, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease stage III.Review of Resident #5's COVID-19 vaccination consent form dated 09/17/25 revealed the resident consented to the vaccination.Review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2025 revealed the resident was not administered the COVID-19 vaccination.2. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/27/25. Diagnoses included acute on chronic respiratory failure, end stage renal disease, acute on chronic congestive heart failure, history or sepsis, and COVID-19.Further review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have call lights within reach for Resident #41, #50 and #56. This affected three residents ( #41, #50 and #56) of 72 residents observed for call lights. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 09/22/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and nontraumatic intercerebral hemorrhage. There were no physician orders regarding call lights.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had severe cognitive impairment and impairment bilaterally to the upper and lower extremities. Resident #41 was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL).Review of the care plan dated 12/17/25 revealed Resident #41 had a potential for falls related to limited mobility and post cerebral vascular accident. Interventions included ensure call light was available to resident's unaffected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident advanced directives (code status) were accurate. This affected one resident (#6) of 53 residents reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: major depressive disorder, dementia, intracranial injury, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, occlusion and stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, alcohol dependence and unspecified psychosis. Record review revealed Resident #6 had an advanced directive order dated 05/07/20 for Full Code status (all life sustaining measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest).Review of a care plan dated 03/19/25 revealed the resident was a full code. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #6 Care Conference Note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure they notified the emergency contact of a resident's change in condition. This affected one resident (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/25 and a discharge date to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnosis included acute on chronic respiratory failure, ventilator dependent, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, hypertension, and tracheostomy status.Review of Resident #38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition, required substantial to maximal assistance with eating, and was dependent on staff for all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, incontinence care, dressing, and bed mobility.Review of progress notes dated 12/19/25 at 2:58 P.M. revealed Resident #38 was experiencing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for residents. This affected three residents (#13, #14, and #19) of three residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan implementation. The facility census was 72.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, adult failure to thrive, homelessness, mood disorder, glaucoma, Guillain-Barre syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, and panic disorder. Review of Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 10/26/25 revealed a BIMS score 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS also revealed Resident #19 required set-up/supervision with all Activities of Daily Living and Mobility. The MDS also indicated the resident showed little interest or pleasure in doing things almost daily. Further review of Resident #19's Medical Record revealed on 11/11/25, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living including hair, nail and oral care. This affected three residents (Resident #30, #31 and #51) of 12 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 72.Findings include: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed a date of admission of 08/08/25. Significant diagnoses included urinary tract infection, need for assistance with personal care, and morbid obesity. Review of a care plan dated 08/08/25 revealed Resident #30 had a self-care deficit related to morbid obesity. Interventions included assisting with activities of daily living as needed.Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating intact cognition.Review of bathing documentation revealed no concerns. Staff were using bathing wipes during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) study was completed as ordered for Resident #80. This affected one resident (#80) reviewed for MRI follow-up. Also based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wounds received dressing orders and documented care. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of one resident observed for wound care of a surgical wound. The facility failed to ensure dressings were changed as ordered for one resident (Resident #28). The total census was 72.Finding include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, high cervical region, spinal stenosis, cervical region, anemia, hyperkalemia, obesity, benign neoplasm of right ovary, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, essential (primary) hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to have interventions in place to maintain a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for Resident #31. This affected one resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV) access and had the potential to affect three additional residents (#1, #2, and #25) identified by the facility with IV access. The facility census was 72.Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/12/25. Significant diagnoses included diabetes type two with a foot ulcer, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of unspecified site. Significant orders included de-clotting by thrombolytic agent of vascular access device or catheter dated 09/11/25, flush PICC line with 10 milliliters (ml) of 0.9 percent sodium chloride every day shift (09/06/25), replace PICC line (09/25/25), cathflo activase…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care according to professional standards for Resident #22 and failed to date and/or change oxygen tubing weekly for Residents #29 and #67. This affected three residents (#22, #29 and #67) of eight residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 72.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 07/25/24 and diagnoses including tracheostomy status, ventilator associated pneumonia, and chronic respiratory failure. The resident had a physician order dated 11/17/25 to receive tracheostomy care every shift and as needed. Observation on 12/22/25 at 10:47 A.M. of tracheostomy care for Resident #22 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #341 revealed she used saline-moistened gauze to wipe at and around the tracheostomy tube and plate, then used another piece of gauze to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician as required. This affected one resident (#69) of 15 residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 09/24/24 with diagnosis that include cerebral infarction due to embolism of the left cerebellar artery, idiopathic aseptic necrosis of right humerus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, aphasia, adult failure to thrive, gastrostomy, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia, hypothyroidism, acute kidney failure, hyperkalemia, and dehydration. Review of Resident #69's record revealed the resident was seen on 05/08/25 by Infectious Disease Doctor #809 for a urinary tract infections and on 09/07/25 by Medical Director #812 after resident had a fall. There were no other listed visits from a physician. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of manufacturer instructions and facility policy, the facility failed to timely administer a physician ordered antibiotic for Resident #41 and correctly administer pen injected insulin for Resident #34 utilizing manufacturer instructions. This affected two residents (#34 and #41) out of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified 19 residents ( #1, #3, #5, #6, #17, #19, #21, #33, #34, #36, #44, #48, #50, #53, #57, #62, #63, #65 and #68) who received pen injected insulin. The facility census was 72.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/22/24 and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type two. Physician orders effective December 2025 included an order for Toujeo solo star insulin 330 units (U) per milliliter (ml) solution pen injector, to inject 10 U subcutaneously every morning for diabetes mellitus. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory testing. This affected three residents (#19, #27 and #57) out of three residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 72.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, adult failure to thrive, homelessness, mood disorder, glaucoma, Guillain-Barre syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea and panic disorder. Review of Resident #19's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/31/24 to obtain a Hemoglobin A1C (a blood test that measures the average blood sugar levels over the past two to three months that indicates the percentage of hemoglobin in the blood that is coated with sugar), a thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level (a blood test that is used to check for thyroid gland problems), and Depakote level (measures the concentration of valproic acid in the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and family interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for Resident #6. This affected one resident (#6) of three residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 72.Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/13/19 with diagnosis that include major depressive disorder, dementia, intracranial injury, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder, occlusion and stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, alcohol dependence, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #6's annual dental exam note dated 10/22/24 revealed the resident had an initial examination and was noted to have dentures. The initial exam noted Resident #6 was doing well with current dentures and the resident had no dental concerns. Review of the progress notes for Resident #6 revealed a note dated 12/17/24 authored by Social Service Designee (SSD) #351 which noted at the last care conference (date not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accomodate Resident #27's food preference as requested by the resident. This affected one resident (#27) of two residents reviewed for food choices. The facility census was 72. Findings include:Review of medical records for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/14/25 with significant diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Significant orders included Regular diet with mechanical soft texture, magic cup two times daily with lunch and dinner, and health supplement two times daily.A review of a quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had no cognitive impairment.A review of a care plan dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident #27 had potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to peripheral vascular disease and dysphasia. Interventions included food in separate bowls per resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #80. This affected one resident (#80) of 53 residents reviewed for the annual survey. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, high cervical region, spinal stenosis, cervical region, anemia, hyperkalemia, obesity, benign neoplasm of right ovary, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, essential (primary) hypertension, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, obstructive sleep apnea, metabolic encephalopathy, quadriplegia, iron deficiency anemia, pain in right knee, vitamin D deficiency, muscle weakness, history of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #80 dated 06/25/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #80 received an indwelling urinary catheter upon physician recommendation, failed to ensure appropriate care and services related to indwelling urinary catheters were in place when Resident #80 returned to the facility, failed to ensure Resident #80 was free from complications related to the indwelling urinary catheter, and failed to ensure complications were followed-up on timely and appropriately. This affected one resident (Resident #80) of three residents who were reviewed for appropriate care and services related to urinary catheters and urinary tract infections. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 06/23/20 and a discharge date of 06/30/24. Diagnoses included stage four chronic kidney disease, liver disease, heart failure, neutropenia, pancytopenia, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent (%) when two medication errors occurred during 26 medication administration opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of ten residents who were reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/29/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic embolism and thrombosis, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, stage three chronic kidney disease, acute respiratory failure, and chronic gout. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 09/20/24 revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact with a primary medical condition categorized as debility and cardiorespiratory conditions. Resident #32 was on a scheduled pain regimen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained while tracheostomy, ventilator, and feeding tube related care were performed by multiple staff members. This affected one resident (Resident #73) of three residents who had tracheostomies and who were observed during the administration of medications or procedures. The facility census was 77. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an original admission date of 06/17/24 and a re-entry date of 07/17/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, muscular dystrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anxiety disorder, sepsis, ileus, tracheostomy status, and attention to gastrotomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 09/09/24 revealed Resident #73 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Resident #73 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's representative was notified of changes in condition related to an active infection which required a change in treatment and of positive cultures for multi drug-resistant organisms which required care plan updates. This affected one resident (Resident #27) of three residents (Residents #27, #39, and #79) reviewed. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24 and a re-entry date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses included intractable epilepsy, temporal sclerosis, essential (primary) hypertension, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, gastrostomy status, depression, candidiasis, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, altered mental status, and presence of a neurostimulator. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 04/23/24 revealed Resident #27 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #27 received enteral feedings and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan that addressed the physical, mental, and psychosocial needs of Resident #27. This affected one resident of five residents (Residents #27, #14, #39, #67, and #79) whose care plans were reviewed for appropriate person-centered interventions. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24 and a re-entry date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses included intractable epilepsy, temporal sclerosis, essential (primary) hypertension, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, gastrostomy status, candidiasis, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, altered mental status, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 04/23/24 revealed Resident #27 had severely impaired cognition and a primary medical condition listed as epilepsy. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #27 had bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview, and package insert for Venlafaxine Extended Release (ER) the facility failed to ensure drug irregularities noted by the pharmacist were reported to the attending physician and acted upon timely. This affected one resident (Resident #27) of three residents (Residents #27, #39, and #79) who were reviewed for appropriate medications. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24 and a re-entry date of 03/14/24. Diagnoses included intractable epilepsy, temporal sclerosis, essential (primary) hypertension, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, gastrostomy status, depression, candidiasis, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, altered mental status, and presence of a neurostimulator. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 04/23/24 revealed Resident #27 had severely impaired cognition and a primary medical condition listed as epilepsy. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #27 had bipolar disorder, had been taking an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store tortillas, cheese, salami, and turkey in a manner to prevent food borne illness and contamination. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility who were receiving food from the kitchen. There were 15 residents (#7, #33, #44, #55, #67, #69, #70, #71, #72, #76, #77, #79, #81, #83, and #238) who were identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 86. Findings include: On 03/25/24 at 9:30 A.M. a tour of the dry storage area of the kitchen revealed a 36-count package of tortillas with a use by date of 02/23/24. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #823 verified the use by date at the time of the observation. On 03/25/24 at 10:00 A.M. an inspection of the snack refrigerator located in the kitchen revealed a 160 count, open package of American cheese that was undated. There were also two packages of approximately 20 slices each of American cheese that was wrapped in plastic and undated. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible parties were included in and offered the opportunity to participate in quarterly care plan meetings. This affected five residents (#13, #18, #25, #42, and #56) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/01/20. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and morbid obesity. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 of 15, moderate cognitive impairment, and suffered from inattention, disorganized thinking which fluctuated in severity, and impaired thought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain written authorizations to manage resident funds. This affected three residents (#18, #34, and #291) of eight residents reviewed for facility fund management. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 05/20/23. Significant diagnoses included acute kidney failure, unspecified dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Resident #18 had a court appointed guardian. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had a BIMS score of three of 15, indicating severe cognitive deficit. A review of the resident fund management authorization form dated 08/22/23 revealed it was signed by Resident #18. There was no signature by the guardian. On 03/27/24 at 1:50P.M. an interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #710 who manages resident funds verified there was no signature of the guardian. 2. Review of the medical records for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a clean environment with walls in good repair for Resident #12. The facility did not ensure an environment free of broken window blinds for Residents #48 and #71. The facility did not ensure a room with comfortable temperatures for Residents #54 and #64. This affected five residents (#12, #48, #71, #54 and #64) of 34 residents observed for environment who resided on the Dogwood and Crab Apple units. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 9/17/10. Significant diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, weakness, mood disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, indicating Resident #12 was cognitively intact. On 03/25/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated to reflect the physician's orders. This affected two residents (#42 and #66) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/13/19. Significant diagnoses included congestive heart failure, edema, diabetes mellitus type II and chronic kidney disease. Significant orders included monitor weight monthly, fluid restriction of 2000 milliliters a day broken down as 860 milliliters for day shift, 300 milliliters for night shift and 840 milliliters for dietary. Other orders included Lasix 40 milligrams (mg) (diuretic) two times daily and potassium 20 milliequivalents (mEq) (supplement) daily. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 of 15, indicating Resident #42 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy the facility did not ensure they had an effective antibiotic stewardship program that monitored antibiotic use including reducing the risk of adverse effects of the development of antibiotic resistant organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. This affected 28 residents (#10, #16, #29, #30, #31, #38, #40, #44, #47, #51, #53, #55, #59, #63, #68, #73, #75, #77, #80, #83, #189, #190, #191, #238, #287, #288, #290 and #337) out of 34 residents identified as ordered antibiotics during the months of February 2024 and March 2024. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the form labeled, Date reported to QA/ RM Committee and dated 03/01/24 revealed the facility tracked residents that had received antibiotics for the month of February 2024. The form included the resident name, admission date, onset of infection date, site of infection, pathogen, antibiotic that was ordered, if isolation was ordered, if the infection was healthcare associated, the date the infection resolved, and if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility did not ensure Resident #80 was treated in a dignified, respectful manner after he requested a blanket from staff because he was cold, and the blanket was not provided. This affected one resident (#80) out of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 86. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 01/26/24 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, presence of tracheostomy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia. He was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 02/20/24 revealed Resident #80 had a self-care deficit related to diagnoses of COPD, chronic lung disease, cerebral infarction that affected activities of daily living (ADL) due to shortness of breath, decreased activity tolerance, and weakness. Interventions included assist with ADL as needed and monitor for increased shortness of breath and fatigue. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify two residents (#8 and #34) when their personal funds account balance was within two hundred dollars of the state allowed limit. This affected two residents (#8 and #34) of eight residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 06/01/14. Significant diagnoses included unspecified dementia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #8 had a court appointed guardian. Resident #8 was on Medicaid as a payor source. A review of resident account balances as of 03/27/24 revealed Resident #8 had $2405.63 in a resident fund account. On 03/27/24 at 1:50P.M. an interview with BOM #710 who manages resident funds revealed she makes phone calls to notify residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility did not ensure staff were knowledgeable regarding how to locate baseline care plans and/ or had [NAME]'s (communication tool that identifies care and services residents require) in place to ensure staff were aware what care and services residents were to receive on admission. This affected two residents (#76 and #82) out of two residents reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 02/14/24 with diagnoses including myelodysplastic syndrome (disorder of the blood cell formation in the bone marrow), diabetes, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Admission/ readmission Packet- V2 dated 02/14/24 and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #838 revealed Resident #82 was alert and oriented times three, communicated verbally with clear speech. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk was completed and noted Resident #82…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including hygiene, fingernail care, and oral care were provided with adequate care. This affected three residents (#51, #71, and #82) out of six residents reviewed for ADL care. This had the potential to affect 67 residents (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #14, #15, #19, #21, #22, #23, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #39, #40, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #50, #53, #54, #55, #57, #59, #60, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #77, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #187, #237, #238, #287, #288, #289, and #290) who required assistance with ADL. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including myelodysplastic syndrome (disorder of the blood cell formation in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure Resident #53's concern regarding hearing and/or request for hearing aids were timely met. This affected one resident (#53) out of one resident reviewed for hearing and had the potential to affect six residents (#6, #15, #30, #51, #53, and #69) identified as hard of hearing. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 09/12/22 with diagnoses including diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the care plan dated 09/26/23 revealed Resident #53 had a risk for communication problems related to hearing deficit. Interventions included anticipating and meeting needs, referring to audiology for hearing consult as ordered, allowing adequate time to respond, repeating (if necessary), do not rush, face when speaking, and using simple brief consistent words. Review of the Ear Nose Throat (ENT) Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to change nasal cannula oxygen tubing in a timely manner. This affected two residents (#6 and #289) of 34 residents utilizing oxygen. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 06/30/20. Significant diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure. Significant orders included oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula, nasal cannula ear cushions, and change oxygen tubing weekly. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was moderately impaired cognitively. Review of the care plan dated 12/13/23 revealed Resident #6 was at risk for altered respiratory status and oxygen should be delivered as ordered. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed oxygen tubing was changed 03/06/24, 03/13/24, 03/20/24. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, and review of self-reported incident (SRI) the facility did not ensure Resident #6's behavior plan of care was followed by staff. This affected one resident (#6) out of one resident reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 06/23/20 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, chronic pain, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 09/11/23 revealed Resident #6 had the potential to be verbally aggressive, throw objects, make false allegations due to ineffective coping skills. Interventions included assess understanding of the situation, allow time to express self and feelings towards the situation, and give as many choices as possible about care. The care plan revealed when she becomes agitated intervene before agitation escalates, guide away from source of distress, engage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure Resident #13's lab work was obtained as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#13) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications including lab work. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 05/01/20 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and morbid obesity. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had impaired cognition. She displayed hallucinations and delusions. Review of the March 2023 physician's order revealed Resident #13 had an order dated 05/05/20 to have a glycated hemoglobin test (hbA1c) (a lab to obtain an overall picture of what the average blood sugar level was over the past three months) every three months. She also had an order for Risperdal (antipsychotic medication which can increase the risk of impaired glucose metabolism). Review of the lab work revealed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had received and/or the facility had documented evidence that residents were offered the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. This affected three residents (#39, #61, #80) of the five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 08/01/23 with diagnoses including myotonic muscular dystrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified atrial fibrillation, dependence on respirator status, and tracheostomy status. Review of immunizations in the electronic medical record did not reflect the pneumococcal vaccine had been administered. Review of the consent form for Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines revealed Resident #39 signed the consent requesting the vaccine on 09/20/23. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 donned a safety apron during smoking per his intervention on his care plan and that the designated smoking area was maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. This affected one resident (Resident #16) out of two residents (Resident #16 and #33) reviewed for smoking and had the potential to affect six residents (Resident #8, #12, #16, #50, #316 and #367) who smoke in the designated smoking area off the 600 unit. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/09/17 and diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and nicotine dependence. Review of quarterly smoking safety assessment dated [DATE] and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #811 revealed Resident #16 was a smoker and required supervision when he smoked. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store, label, and dispose of resident medications. This affected one resident (Resident #14) of three residents on the 700 unit who received latanoprost ophthalmic solution (eye drops), one resident (Resident #2) of two residents on the 700 unit who received Lantus (long acting insulin), one resident (Resident #10) of one resident on the 700 unit who received Novolog (short acting insulin), one resident (Resident #57) of one resident on the 700 unit who received trifluridine ophthalmic solution (eye drops), and one resident (Resident #30) of four residents on the 600 unit who received Novolin (short acting insulin). Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/19/22 at 1:56 P.M. on the 700 unit with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #456 during medication storage review revealed Resident #14 had latanoprost ophthalmic solution with an opened date of 03/03/22 with manufacturer's directions to discard after six weeks of opening. Resident #14's latanoprost should have been discarded on 04/14/22. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #165's physician timely of a change in the resident's abdominal incision. This affected one (Resident #165) of two residents reviewed for general skin conditions. Findings include: Review of Resident #165's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma and incisional hernia with obstruction without gangrene. Review of Resident #165's Admission/readmission Packet form dated 04/07/22 indicated the resident had a abdominal midline incision hernia repair. Review of Resident #165's progress note dated 04/14/22 at 2:36 A.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #805 indicated drainage was observed at the incision site in the right upper quadrant. Pus without odor was cleaned with normal saline and a dressing applied. Review of Resident #165's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/16/22 to cleanse the right upper quadrant laproscopic wound site with normal saline and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #37 and #46's comprehensive assessments were completed accurately. This affected two (Residents #37 and #46) of twenty-five residents whose records were reviewed for accurate comprehensive assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 03/17/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, essential hypertension, and acute osteomyelitis. Review of Resident #46's Admission/readmission Packet form dated 03/17/22 revealed she was admitted with a stage four pressure ulcer (deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) to the coccyx. Review of the Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had intact cognition and did not have a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over a bony prominence, or a non-removable dressing/device. Interview on 04/20/22 at 10:46 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #450 verified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's care plan was revised as needed. This affected one resident (Resident #33) out of 25 residents whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 10/18/17 and diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the care plan dated 06/17/20 revealed Resident #33 had self-care deficits noted as she had a right sided hemiplegia. She required assistance with most activities of daily living except she was able to feed herself. She refused to get out of bed most of the time and refused to wear a palm guard. She wore a brace to her right lower leg. Interventions included ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to her right lower extremity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received restorative nursing range of motion and restorative ambulation program per his plan of care. This affected one resident (Resident #16) out of one resident reviewed for restorative nursing programs. The facility identified eight residents (Resident #2, #14, #16, #21, #30, #42, #49, #56) who had a restorative nursing program. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 03/09/17 and diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and nicotine dependence. Review of Physical Therapy Discharge Summary dated 11/02/21 and completed by Physical Therapist #900 revealed Resident #16 received physical therapy from 08/10/21 to 11/01/21 due to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting his left non-dominant side. Discharge recommendations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained timely for Resident #165's wound care to the laproscopic wound on her right upper quadrant. This affected one (Resident #165) of two residents reviewed for general skin conditions. Findings include: Review of Resident #165's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma and incisional hernia with obstruction without gangrene. Review of Resident #165's Admission/readmission Packet form dated 04/07/22 indicated the resident had a abdominal midline incision hernia repair. Review of Resident #165's progress note dated 04/14/22 at 2:36 A.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #805 indicated drainage was observed at the incision site in the right upper quadrant. Pus without odor was cleaned with normal saline and a dressing applied. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #165 did not have a physician order for wound care to her right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-use glucometer was appropriately disinfected and sanitized between resident use to prevent cross contamination. This affected one resident (Resident #13) of nine residents (Resident #11, #13, #14, #18, #25, #37, #40, #46, #167) who received blood glucose testing (BGT) on the 500 unit. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/21 with diagnoses including type two diabetes without complications, acute kidney failure and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #13's physician order dated 03/01/22 indicated to complete a BGT twice daily for glucose monitoring. Observation on 04/18/22 at 9:10 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #452 revealed she obtained Resident #43's BGT by using a multi-use glucometer. RN #452 returned to the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 and Resident #64 had or that facility had documented evidence that they were offered the pneumococcal vaccine. This affected two residents (Resident #30 and #64) out of five residents (Resident #8, #20, #28, #30, #64) reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 07/31/19 and diagnoses including diabetes, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, dementia, and history of COVID-19. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had impaired cognition. The MDS assessment also revealed Resident #30 was not up to date regarding his pneumococcal vaccination as the MDS revealed he was not offered the vaccine. Review of undated facility form labeled, Immunization Audit Report for Resident #30 revealed no documentation Resident #30 received or that he was offered the pneumococcal vaccine. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,137 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $4,095 — penalty dated 2024-04-11
- $16,042 — penalty dated 2024-04-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-27 for 23 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GARDEN SPRINGS HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASTLE ROCK NURSING MEMBER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 41% | since 05/01/2020 |
| MEB IRRV TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 5% | since 05/01/2020 |
| YFR EQUITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 8% | since 01/01/2023 |
| GOTTLIEB, MIKOLS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2023 |
| MAHILNITSKI, ILYA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 01/01/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, MATIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 41% | since 05/01/2020 |
| BARENBAUM, ALYSSA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2020 |
| GEORGE, SHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| MCNABB, BRUCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, RACHELLE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2025 |
| PHILIPSON FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $500K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365539. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.