Heritage At Brandon Place Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 69 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 08/16/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure Resident #2, who had a known history of unsafe smoking did not smoke in their room and catch themselves on fire. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia. Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with second and third degree burns. On 08/16/24 at 11:45 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation related to for Res #2 smoking in their room and catching themselves on fire. On 08/16/24 at 11:47 a.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 08/19/24 at 9:10 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal documented: Plan of Removal (Accident Hazards Related to Smoking Without Supervision) Tag Cited: F-689 (Accident Hazards Related to Smoking Without Supervision) Preparation and/or execution of this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-12-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced pain received treatment for pain for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for pain management. The VP of clinical services identified 46 residents had orders for pain management in the facility. Findings: The Administering Pain Medications policy, revised 10/10, read in part, The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to resident comfort. The policy also read, .Acute pain should be assessed every 30 to 60 minutes after the onset and reassessed as indicated after analgesic relief is obtained .Administer pain medication as ordered .document the following in the resident's medical record: results of the pain assessment; medication; dose; route of administration; and results of the medication. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included pain, dementia, and displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of humerus, left arm, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions and perform hand hygiene to prevent the development of infections for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control.The DON identified 55 residents resided in the facility and 13 residents with enhanced barrier precautions. Findings:On 05/05/26 at 12:40 p.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed providing incontinent care for Resident #1. A sign posted at Resident #1's door read, enhanced barrier precautions, staff must wear gown and gloves for bathing, changing linen, and providing hygiene for the resident. CNA #1 and CNA #2 did not wear a gown when providing care. CNA #1 did not wash or sanitize their hands when changing their gloves and moving from a dirty area to a clean area. On 05/05/26 at 2:25 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to change the wound vac dressing for Resident #1. LPN #1 was not wearing a gown. LPN #1 stated they did not know the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions. LPN #1 placed a new wound vac dressing, removed their gloves, and did not wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and care for a resident with a wound vac for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a wound vac. The DON identified one resident with a wound vac. Findings:On 05/05/26 at 12:00 p.m., Resident #1 was observed lying in a bariatric bed with an air mattress in place watching television. Resident #1 had a wound vac to the abdomen, the dressing was not dated, and the wound vac machine was turned off.An undated admission record showed Resident #1 had diagnoses which included local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, type 2 diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer of contiguous site of back, buttock, and hip stage 2.An undated facility policy titled Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, read in part, Whenever therapy cannot be resumed within two hours, remove the dressing and apply a moist wound dressing. Notify physician for specific orders.A treatment administration record, dated 04/21/26, showed a treatment for a midline abdomen surgical wound. The order showed the staff was to cleanse the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatments to promote healing and prevent infection for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified three residents with pressure ulcers. Findings:On 05/05/26 at 12:42 p.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed to enter Resident #1's room to provide incontinent care. CNA #2 positioned Resident #1 on their side and CNA #1 washed Resident #1's buttock. There was packing in the pressure ulcer, but no dressing covering the wound. Bowel was on the edges and inside edges of the pressure ulcer. When CNA #1 was rolling the soiled linen to discard CNA #1 also caught the packing that was in the pressure ulcer wound bed. CNA #1 removed the packing part of the dressing with the soiled linen. CNA #1 did not tell the nurse about the resident's dressing (packing) being removed.On 5/06/26 at 10:17 a.m., the ADON was observed to complete wound care to the bilateral gluteal folds for Resident #1. There was no dressing covering the pressure ulcer wounds. An undated admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of past State survey results in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to residents, representatives, and the public.The DON identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 01/12/26 at 11:34 a.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. There was no notice informing the public where the past State survey results were posted.On 01/12/26 at 11:40 a.m., the past State survey results were observed in a binder on the administrator's door in a file holder.On 01/12/26 at 11:44 a.m., the administrator stated the there was no notice posted about where to locate the past State survey results. They stated it should have been posted on the bulletin board.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for 3 (#1, 3, and #7) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with ADLs.The DON identified 38 residents required assistance with bathing. Findings: An Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, revised 01/26/25, read in part, Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, and grooming .A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. 1. A facility Bath List schedule, dated 11/07/25, showed Resident #7 was to receive showers three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Resident #7's quarterly resident assessment, dated 11/14/25, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 12. The assessment showed Resident #7 required partial to moderate assistance from staff for showers. A facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' property was not misappropriated for three (#3, 4, and #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated ABUSE, NEGLECT, EXPLOITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY PROHIBITION policy, read in part, The Facility will ensure a safe environment for residents by prohibiting abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property with mechanisms for reporting, investigating, and protecting residents from actual or potential harm. 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. A nursing note, dated 08/03/24 at 1:50 p.m., documented the resident reported someone had moved their card in their wallet. They looked at their online banking and noticed that on 08/01/24 there were two withdrawals. One withdrawal was for $440 and one was for $500. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 08/03/24, documented an allegation of misappropriation of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach of a resident for one (#1) of three sampled residents observed for call lights in reach. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 05/2024, read in part, The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light to allow residents to call for assistance. The policy also read, All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light. The policy also read, Each resident will be evaluated for unique needs and performances to determine any special accommodations that may be needed in order for the resident to utilize the call system. The policy also read, Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included weakness and congestive heart failure. Resident #1's care plan for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated ABUSE, NEGLECT, EXPLOITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY PROHIBITION policy, read in part, The Facility will ensure a safe environment for residents by prohibiting abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property with mechanisms for reporting, investigating, and protecting residents from actual or potential harm. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. A nursing note, dated 08/03/24 at 1:50 p.m., documented the resident reported someone had moved their card in their wallet. They looked at their online banking and noticed that on 08/01/24 there were two withdrawals. One withdrawal was for $440 and one was for $500. An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 08/03/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were not collected without a physician order for one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for lab services. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol policy, revised 09/2012, read in part, The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on diagnostic and monitoring needs. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included chronic peripheral venous insufficiency and nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. A lab report, dated 10/13/24, documented a CBC, CMP, HbA1c and prothrombin time with INR were collected. There was no physician order to collect the labs. On 12/05/24 at 12:43 p.m., the VP of clinical services stated they could not locate a lab order for the labs collected on 10/13/24 for Resident #6. On 12/05/24 at 12:46 p.m., the VP of clinical services stated the facility's process for laboratory services was to receive an order from the provider, contact the lab, verify completion, retrieve results,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident identifiable records were not released to the public. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Rights Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures policy, dated 10/2010, read in part, Staff must have appropriate in-service training on resident rights, including; Confidentiality of protected health information; A HIPAA Training Program policy, dated 04/2007, read in part, All facility personnel, including business associates, are required to attend our facility's HIPAA compliance training program. On 11/27/24 at 3:24 p.m., the previous administrator stated the process for releasing medical records was that once the request form was signed it would go to the corporate office. They stated the corporate office then would decide if there would be a charge and then would send out the records themselves. They stated records were not sent out unless the corporate office stated to do so. They stated the corporate office gave direction to send the records for Resident #1 by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,311 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-12-09
• $26,487 — penalty dated 2024-08-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHWEST LTC — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK