Northwest Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 01/08/23 related to the facility's failure to ensure an elopement assessment was completed on admission and a resident was free from accident hazards for a resident who had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and history of stimulant abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #102 from eloping from the facility which had the potential to result in serious injury or harm. On 09/11/23, the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to protect and prevent accident hazards related to elopement. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 05/09/23 after the facility put measures in place to prevent recurrence. On 01/09/23 staff was in-serviced about the policy and procedure on elopement. The facility performed an elopement community-based drill on 03/20/23 and 03/21/23. The facility completed elopement assessments on all residents by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accident did not occur for a resident during facility transport for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified eight residents used the facility van for transportation. Findings:On 07/17/25 at 10:59 a.m., the maintenance supervisor demonstrated the process of preparing a resident for transport per wheelchair using the facility van. There were four straps to be connected to the wheelchair at all sides. An undated form titled Policy and Procedure Securing a Wheelchair For Van Transport, read in part, Safety is the top priority when transporting wheelchair users in a wheelchair van. Position the wheelchair in the van as close as possible to the safety straps bolted in the floor. Check that the wheelchair's locks are in place and that four straps with hooks are bolted on the floor, as well as the regular seat belt that goes around the person who is in the wheelchair. Put the seat belt across the individual's lap and chest and fasten it. Adjust the seat belt…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0637 — pattern
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment had been completed when hospice services were elected for 2 (#4 and #75) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed.The administrator identified 11 residents on hospice services.Findings: 1. A progress note, dated 03/19/25, showed Resident #75 wanted to switch hospice companies. A physician order, dated 03/21/25, showed Resident #75was ordered to be evaluated by the resident's hospice of choice. A significant change assessment, dated 05/16/25, showed Resident #75 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making, had a life expectancy of less than 6 months, and the sections of the assessment had been completed on 06/02/25. On 07/23/25 at 6:00 p.m., the administrator was asked when Resident #75 had been originally admitted to hospice services. They stated they did not have an order for the first hospice Resident #75 had been admitted to, but they had elected the hospice benefit in February or March 2025 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 3 (#20, 29, and #69) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans.The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An undated policy titled Care Plans, read in part, To assure the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a preliminary care plan will be developed within twenty-four (24) hours of the resident's admission. A policy titled Baseline Care Plan, dated 08/01/24, read in part, The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality .The baseline care plan will .Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission 1.An admission MDS, dated 02/19/25, showed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 3 (#61, 69, and #73) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. An admission assessment, dated 02/20/25, showed Resident #73 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. The care area assessment summary showed visual function, ADL function, urinary incontinence/indwelling catheter, psychosocial well-being, activities, falls, nutritional status, pressure ulcer, psychotropic drug use, pain, and return to the community referral were all triggered care areas from the assessment and care planning decisions had been made. The admission assessment showed the care area assessment summary and care planning decisions had been completed by the VP of reimbursement on 02/28/25. A care plan, reviewed 06/09/25, showed a care plan for falls. The care plan did not show the other triggered areas on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion was provided to residents for 3 (#2, 13, and #61) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for position and mobility.The administrator identified 12 residents had limited range of motion resided in the facility.Findings:1. On 07/15/25 at 11:57 a.m., Resident #2 was in bed and had contracted upper and lower extremities. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 06/16/25, showed Resident #2 had diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and aphasia. The assessment showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The assessment showed the resident had impairment on both upper and lower extremities. The assessment showed no passive or active range of motion was perform in the seven days look back period. The assessment showed the resident was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living. There was no documentation Resident #2 received range of motion services. 2. On 07/15/25 at 12:53 p.m., Resident #13 was observed in bed with right side weakness and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis services were assessed before and after dialysis for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis.Corporate Nurse Consultant #1 identified two residents who required dialysis.Findings: An undated policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, read in part, Residents with end-stage renal disease [ESRD] will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. An annual assessment, dated 04/12/25, showed Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making, had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease, and received dialysis. A July 2025 treatment record showed the fistula for Resident #7 was monitored every shift. A care plan, reviewed 07/14/25, showed Resident #7 required dialysis and was scheduled weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 1:30 p.m. A Dialysis Communication form, dated 07/18/25, showed vital signs had been obtained for Resident #7 by facility staff. The bottom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure anticoagulant monitoring was in place for a high-risk medication for 1 (#69) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The administrator identified 62 residents resided at the facility, and 30 residents received anticoagulant therapy. Findings: An undated policy titled High Risk Medications-Anticoagulants, read in part, This facility recognizes that some medications, including anticoagulants, are associated with greater risks of adverse consequences than other medications. This policy addresses the facility's collaborative, systemic approach to managing anticoagulant therapy for efficacy and safety.The resident's plan of care shall alert staff to monitor for adverse consequences. An undated order summary for Resident #69's showed diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure, and tracheostomy status. A physicians order, dated 03/28/25, showed Apixaban (blood thinner) 5 mg tablet two times a day. This order was discontinued on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual comprehensive assessment was completed within 366 days of the previous annual comprehensive assessment for 1 (#9) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed.The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An annual assessment, dated 11/18/24, showed Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The annual assessment showed it was completed on 12/13/24. An MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 12/13/24, showed the annual assessment for Resident #9, read in part, Assessment Completed Late: An OBRA comprehensive assessment with the Care Area Assessment [Section V] is due every year unless the resident is no longer in the facility. A prior record with an ARD [A2300] within 366 days of the submitted record could not be found. On 07/23/25 at 6:13 p.m., the administrator stated they had not had an MDS coordinator,. They stated they were utilizing the corporate MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion for 1 (#7) of 19 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed.The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A SNF Part A discharge assessment, dated 02/26/25, showed Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making, Part A skilled services had ended on 02/26/25, and the sections of the assessment were completed on 06/02/25. An MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 06/05/25, showed the SNF Part A discharge assessment for Resident #7, read in part, Assessment Completed Late: Z0500B [assessment completion date] is more than 14 days after A2300 [assessment reference date] On 07/23/25 at 6:13 p.m., the administrator stated the corporate MDS coordinator had been completing assessments, but some were late due to the transition of MDS coordinators in the facility.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was accurate for 1 (#20) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments.The administrator identified 62 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A document titled, Transition Plan, dated 11/21/24, showed Resident #20 was discharged from an inpatient behavioral health facility on 11/21/24 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia.A Quarterly MDS, dated 05/22/25, showed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The MDS showed Resident #20 did not receive antipsychotic medications.A review of Resident #20's MAR for February and March 2025 showed Resident #20 received Paliperidone ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24Hour (an atypical antipsychotic) 6 MG tablet one time daily for schizophrenia.A review of Resident #20's MAR for March, April, and May 2025 showed Resident #20 received Zyprexa Oral Tablet 5 MG (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a diagnosis on a PASARR form for a mental health illness for 1 (#20) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for the need of a level II screening.The administrator identified 13 residents with mental illness resided in the facility.Findings:A document titled Transition Plan, dated 11/21/24, showed Resident #20 was discharged from an inpatient behavioral health facility on 11/21/24 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia.An admission MDS, dated 02/19/25, showed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. The MDS showed Resident #20 did not receive antipsychotic medications. The MDS showed Resident #20 was not considered by the state level 2 PASARR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition.A Psychiatric Exam, dated 02/20/25, read in part, Patient is on Paliperidone [an atypical antipsychotic]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,062 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,062 — penalty dated 2023-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHWEST LTC — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $473K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK