Cedar Hill Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 83.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (Resident#1) of 8 residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had adequate supervision on Saturday 07/19/25 for approximately 30 minutes. Resident#1 left out the front door and wheeled himself across 4 lanes (with two lanes that ran in the opposite direction) of traffic across the street to the gas station unsupervised. These failures could place residents' health and safety at risk. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 07/19/25 and ended on 07/31/25 the facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began. Findings included: Record review of Resident#1's face sheet reflected, he was a [AGE] year old male who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and diagnosed with unspecified Dementia ( diagnosis used when a person exhibits symptoms of dementia, but the specific type or cause…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and exploitation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was protected from sexual abuse by Resident #2. Resident #2 was found in Resident #1's bed lying to top of Resident #1, both nude from the waist down and Resident #2 was observed to have his hand on Resident #1's vaginal area as he swayed his hips side to side. On 11/04/24 at 5:00 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 11/05/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of sexually inappropriate behaviors from other residents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored in the facility freezer on 06/30/25. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation on 6/30/25 at 9:48 AM in the facility freezer revealed frozen cinnamon rolls were left uncovered in an open brown box exposing them to frigid air. In an interview 07/01/25 12:44 PM with the Dietary Manager who stated that everyone including cooks, dietary aides and himself were responsible for covering, dating, and labeling all food items in the kitchen. He stated all foods should be appropriately covered and sealed. He stated he tossed away the cinnamon rolls that were left open inside the freezer. He added the risk to residents of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents toileting facilities were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for assistance for 5 Residents (Resident#13, Resident#16, Resident#57, Resident#63, and Resident#87) of 20 residents reviewed for residents' call systems. The facility failed on 06/30/2025 to ensure the call light system was accessible to a resident, lying on the floor in the shared residents' toilets located inside the residents' rooms when the call lights were missing the pull strings, for:. Resident#13. Resident#16 . Resident#57. Resident#63 . Resident#87 This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of being unable to have a means of directly contacting caregivers. Findings included: -Observation on 06/30/25 at 10:48 AM residents' toilet call light pull string was missing for Resident#13 and Resident#16. - -Observation on 06/30/25 at 11:30 AM residents' toilet call light pull string was missing for Resident#57 and Resident#87. -Observation on 06/30/25 at 11:37 AM resident's toilet call light pull string…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to make a comprehensive assessment of each residents' needs, strengths, goals, life history, and preferences within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to accurately complete Resident #31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment on 6/3/25 by not accounting for the falls on 4/18/25, 5/8/25, 5/16/25, 5/17/25, 5/21/25, 5/22/25 which occurred prior to her re-admittance to the facility on 6/2/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 7/2/25 indicated Resident #31 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Resident #31 had the following diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy (condition in which brain dysfunction occurs resulting in altered mental state, confusion and changes in behavior), and Extrapyramidal Movement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 6 residents (Resident#8, and Resident#63) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #8's, and Resident#63's ADLs on the care plan revision dated 04/02/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate treatment and services. The findings included: Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Muscles weakness (generalized). Resident #8 had a BIMS score of 09…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #80) of 12 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed on 06/30/2025 to ensure the following:1. Resident #8 had her fingernails trimmed.2. Resident #80 had fingernails trimmed and cleaned. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Muscles weakness (generalized). Resident #8 had a BIMS score of 09 which indicated Resident #8's cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #8 was dependent on the staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 Resident (Resident #8) of 6 residents reviewed for foot care. The facility failed on 06/30/2025 and did not provide adequate foot care for Resident #8 who was also a diabetic and had a standing order for podiatric services. Resident #8's Toenails were chipped, thick, and long. This failure could put residents at risk for infection, impaired mobility, and poor foot health as well as a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Muscles weakness (generalized). Resident #8 had a BIMS score of 09/15 which indicated Resident #8's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review revealed Resident #8 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 (Resident #41) resident reviewed for infection control. The facility failed on 06/30/2025 when CNA A failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when she went from dirty to clean during incontinence care for Resident #41. This deficient practice could place residents and nursing staff at risk of transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed that Resident #41 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, Cerebrovascular accident, and weakness. Resident #41 had a BIMS score of 09 which indicated Resident #41's cognition was moderately impaired. Further review revealed Resident #41 was always…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three of seven residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for accommodation of needs, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's, and Resident #4's call lights were placed within their reach on 03/05/25. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's call light string was not obstructed by a mechanical lift sling which was placed on top of the call light string preventing Resident #3 to pull the string to activate the call light on 03/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. Findings included: Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's admission Record dated 03/05/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive nervous system disorder, which affects the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) resident reviewed for infection control. CNA A did not perform hand hygiene after providing incontinent care for Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents and nursing staff at risk of transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/5/2025, revealed that Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle mass), and convulsions (seizures). Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 4/23/2024 , revealed that the goal for Resident #1 was to not have any signs and symptoms of infection through the target date of 3/21/2025. In an observation on 3/5/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility freezer and preparation area had use-by date. 2. The facility failed to perform hand hygiene while preparing food for lunch service. 3. The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen that was free of flies. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation on 06/24/24 at 11:59 AM in facility's walk-in freezer revealed 2 packets of frozen broad beans did not had a use by date. Observation on 06/24/24 at 12:22 PM in facility's dining area revealed 6 house flies on resident's food plate and tables during the lunch service. Observation on 6/25/24 at 11:30 AM on facility's kitchen preparation and serving area revealed 2 houseflies sitting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,503 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-08-15
• $13,390 — penalty dated 2024-11-05
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-12 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHWEST LTC — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX